Abstract
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolate-769, human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) protease (PDB ID: 1TW7), was shown to exhibit wide-open flaps and an expanded active site cavity, causing loss of contacts with protease inhibitors. In the current study, the expanded active site cavity of MDR769 HIV-1 protease was screened with a series of peptide-inhibitors that were designed to mimic the natural substrate cleavage site, capsid/p2. Scanning Ala/Phe chemical mutagenesis approach was incorporated into the design of the peptide series to mimic the substrate co-evolution. Among the peptides synthesized and evaluated, a lead peptide (6a) with potent activity (IC50: 4.4 nM) was identified against the MDR769 HIV-1 protease. Isothermal titration calorimetric analysis showed favorable binding profile for 6a against both wild type and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of 15N-labeled MDR769 HIV-1 protease in complex with 6a showed perturbations in chemical shifts, indicating the peptide-induced conformational changes in protease. Modeling analysis revealed multiple contacts between 6a and MDR769 HIV-1 protease. The lead peptide-inhibitor, 6a, with high potency and good binding profile can be used as the basis for developing potent small molecule inhibitors against MDR variants of HIV.
Keywords: HIV/AIDS, HIV-1 protease, protease inhibitors, multidrug-resistance, CA/p2-analogs, chemical mutagenesis
1. Introduction
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), caused by the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection, claims millions of lives each year (www.unaids.org). Currently there are six different classes of FDA-approved drugs available for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, among which, protease inhibitors (PI) have been very successful [1]. HIV-1 protease is a homodimeric aspartyl protease [2] with two catalytic aspartic acid residues, Asp25 and Asp125. Due to the critical requirement of the protease in the life cycle of HIV-1, inhibition of HIV-1 protease for therapeutic intervention, has been evaluated using different strategies [3] – conventional competitive substrate mimics [4], protease dimerization inhibitors [5], allosteric inhibitors [6] and irreversible inhibitors [7] – of which, the conventional approach has been clinically the most successful to date. In fact, all the FDA approved PIs that are currently in clinical use were designed using the conventional approach and incorporate a unique hydroxyl group that mimics the tetrahedral reaction intermediate formed during substrate hydrolysis, resulting in enhanced affinity [8].
Rapid [9] and error-prone replication of HIV-1 incorporates multiple mutations [10] in the viral proteins including the protease. Drug-resistant mutations that are selected under the clinical pressure make the virus, replication-competent in the presence of PIs due to loss of binding affinity of the PI and compensatory mutations in the substrate that restore substrate binding affinity to the mutant/drug-resistant protease (substrate co-evolution) [11]. Accumulation of mutations in the protease leads to loss of induced-fit against both substrate and PIs but the substrate co-evolution restores the lost induced-fit for the substrate against protease helping the viral replication to continue in the presence of PIs. Crystal structures of multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolate-769 [12] human immunodeficiency type-1 (HIV-1) protease variants show an expanded active site cavity with wide-open conformation of flaps [13, 14]. Due to the expanded active site cavity, PIs show loss of contacts [15, 16] resulting in loss of potency. In order to restore the potency of PIs, one should understand the organization of the binding pockets by scanning and probing the expanded active site.
In the current study, a series of natural substrate cleavage site, capsid/p2 (CA/p2) (Figure 1) analog peptide-inhibitors was designed and synthesized using a scanning Ala/Phe chemical mutagenesis approach. The rationale for this approach was to mimic the substrate co-evolution that would yield a lead peptide-inhibitor with best fit (enhanced binding and inhibitory profiles) against the MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants that show expanded active site cavity. Enzyme inhibition assays were performed to identify lead peptide-inhibitor (6a). Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and molecular modeling were performed to understand the binding of 6a to the MDR769 HIV-1 protease.
Figure 1.

Structures of CA/p2 and lead peptide-inhibitor, 6a Top panel shows the structure of CA/p2 substrate cleavage site mimic, peptide, spanning from P3 to P4'. Bottom panel shows the lead peptide-inhibitor, 6a, with modifications highlighted in red at P1' and P4'. The labile peptide bond between P1 and P1' in CA/p2 is replaced with a reduced peptide bond (-CH2-NH-) in 6a (indicated by the red arrow).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Synthesis of peptide-inhibitors
Details of the synthetic procedures including synthetic schemes are given in the supplementary information associated with this article.
2.2. Enzyme inhibition assay
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based enzyme inhibition assays were performed as described previously [16] using fluorogenic HIV-1 substrate (purchased from Molecular Probes – California, USA). The wild type (NL4-3) HIV-1 protease was purchased from Bachem at a concentration of 0.3 mg/ml. Active MDR769 HIV-1 protease was expressed and purified as described previously [17]. The final purified active MDR769 HIV-1 protease was at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml. The final IC50 values are the average of three independent experiments.
2.3. Expression and purification of 15N-labeled MDR769 HIV-1 protease
Expression and purification of 15N-labeled MDR769 HIV-1 protease was performed using a modified protocol described previously [17]. Briefly, the BL21-DE3 (pLysE) E.coli cells were transformed with pRSET-B plasmid harboring the MDR769 (D25N+A82T) HIV-1 protease gene cloned in frame with an Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) inducible T7 promoter. The D25N mutation was to prevent protease auto-proteolysis and the A82T mutation was to perform a direct comparison between the NMR and crystal structure in future. Crystallization trials of MDR769 (D25N+A82T) in complex with 6a are currently in progress. A82T mutation was found to enhance the crystallizability of MDR769 HIV-1 protease (example PDB IDs: 3R0W, 3R0Y, 4EYR). The transformed E.coli cells were grown in 20 ml of Luria Bertani (LB) medium to OD600 of 1.0. The cells were harvested as a pellet and the pellet was resuspended in 500 ml of 1× M9, minimal medium. Cells were cultured in the M9 medium until OD600 of 0.8. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and the cell pellet was used to inoculate 2 L of 15N-labeled M9 medium containing 15N-NH4Cl. The cells were cultured up to an OD600 of 0.4. Protease expression was induced with 1mM IPTG. Cultures were grown for 6 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 30 min. and were lysed using a French press. Inclusion bodies were harvested from the cell extracts and were dissolved in 6M urea. Denatured protease was purified using ion-exchange chromatography and was refolded by dialysis. Refolded protease was further concentrated using Amicon filters.
2.4. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry
ITC measurements were performed on a VP-ITC microcalorimeter (MicroCal, Inc., Northampton, USA). Samples of MDR769 (D25N+A82T protease were prepared at concentrations in the range of 20-120 μM. Peptide concentrations were kept constant at either 2 or 3 mM. Temperature was either 25, 30 or 37 °C. After the initial 1 μL injection there were 19 or 29 additional injections of 15 or 10 μL, respectively. Spacing between injections was kept at either 210 or 180 s. The protease and the different peptides were all in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at or around pH 7.0. The best result (isotherm shown in Figure 2) was collected on 6a peptide at 30 °C with MDR769 (D25N+A82T) HIV-1 protease concentration of 70-118 μM, peptide concentration of 2 mM, 29 injections, and 180 s. time between injections. Similar conditions were used for NL4-3 to obtain the binding isotherm for 6a. Other instrument parameters used: 500 rpm injector stirring speed. Data analysis was performed using the Origin 5.0 software supplied by MicroCal Inc. The software uses a nonlinear least-square curve-fitting algorithm to calculate the dissociation constant, stoichiometric ratio and change in enthalpy of the reaction. All the final values were average obtained from two independent experiments. ΔG values were calculated using the equation ΔG = ΔH − TΔS.
Figure 2.

Isothermal titration calorimetric (ITC) analysis of 6a. Panels a and b show the ITC evaluation of 6a against wild type (NL4-3) and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants, respectively. In each panel, the raw data is shown on the top and the binding isotherm is shown at the bottom. The red line in the raw ITC data indicates base line while the red line in binding isotherm indicates the curve fit to the data points. 6a shows favorable binding profiles against both NL4-3 and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants.
2.5. NMR spectroscopy of 15N-labeled MDR769 HIV-1 protease
NMR experiments were performed on a Varian INOVA 600 MHz spectrometer (located at the Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI) equipped with a triple-resonance 1H/13C/15N cold probe with z-axis pulsed field gradients. Samples of protease were prepared at 100 μM in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.0 and experiments were run at 22 °C. 1H/15N-HSQC were collected with a 1H sweep width of 10000 Hz, 2048 points and 32 transients, and with 15N sweep width of 3000 Hz, and 512 increments. The same sample was rerun with the same parameters after the addition of 6a at 20-fold excess. Spectra were referenced using an external 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS) control sample [18]. Data were transformed using NMRPipe [19]. Peak identifications were done partially based on previously published chemical shifts for the wild type protease [20] and labeled using Sparky [21].
2.6. Docking analysis of 6a against MDR769 HIV-1 protease
All the docking experiments were performed using AutoDock Vina [22] as described previously [16]. Briefly, PDB IDs: 1TW7 (MDR769 HIV-1 protease with wide-open flaps) and 3SO9 (MDR769 HIV-1 protease with closed flaps) were used as receptors, which were prepared before docking, using AutoDock tools [23] (ADT)-GUI (Graphic User Interface). All the molecular graphics in this article were prepared using the open source PyMol (Ver. 0.99rc6) program (www.pymol.org).
3. Results
3.1. Design of the peptide-inhibitor library
As shown in Table 1, a series of nine peptides (6a-6g), including two short peptides (7a and 7b), was designed. The labile peptide bond (-CO-NH-) in peptides 6a-6g was replaced with a reduced peptide bond [24] (-CH2-NH-) to avoid cleavage by the protease in the enzyme assays. Peptides 6a-6g span from P3-Arg to P4'-Nle while the two short peptides, 7a and 7b represent P1'-P2'-P3'-P4' and P3-P2-P1 groups, respectively from the CA/p2 peptide. The Met residue at P4' was replaced by isosteric Nle for synthetic convenience. Previously it has been shown that replacement of Ala at P1' with derivatives of Phe enhanced binding of CA/p2 peptide to HIV-1 protease [25]. Moreover, all the FDA approved PIs that are currently in use consist of at least one phenyl group either at P1 or at P1'. In the current study, all the peptides consist of Phe at P1' position to enhance the overall binding of the peptide to the MDR769 HIV-1 protease.
Table 1.
IC50 (nM) values of peptide-inhibitors against wild type (NL4-3) and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants.
| Compound | Sequence | IC50a ± SDb | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| P3-P2-P1 - rc - P1'-P2'-P3'-P4' | Wild type | MDR769 | |
| 6a | Arg-Val-Leu-r-PHE-Glu-Ala-Nle | 2.60 ± 0.4 | 4.40 ± 0.7 |
| 6b | Arg-ALA-Leu-r-Phe-Glu-Ala-Nle | 78.20 ± 11.7 | 74.10 ± 10.4 |
| 6c | Arg-PHE-Leu-r-Phe-Glu-Ala-Nle | >1000 | 770.00 ± 62.9 |
| 6d | Arg-Val-ALA-r-Phe-Glu-Ala-Nle | >1000 | >1000 |
| 6e | Arg-Val-PHE-r-Phe-Glu-Ala-Nle | 31.00 ±14.6 | 142.00 ± 4.0 |
| 6f | Arg-Val-Leu-r-Phe-ALA-Ala-Nle | 232.00 ± 30.0 | 234 ± 3.21 |
| 6g | Arg-Val-Leu-r-Phe-PHE-Ala-Nle | >1000 | >1000 |
| 7a | Phe-Glu-Ala-Nle | >1000 | >1000 |
| 7b | Arg-Val-Leu | >1000 | >1000 |
IC50-half maximal inhibitory concentration.
SD-standard deviation.
Reduced peptide bond (-r-) to avoid cleavage by protease.
3.2. Lead peptide (6a) shows >16- to >220-fold higher potency
A highly potent lead peptide, 6a, (Figure 1) was identified against the MDR769 HIV-1 protease in the enzyme inhibition assays (Table 1). This is the first report of a highly potent substrate-analog peptide-inhibitor against MDR769 HIV-1 protease. The lead peptide, 6a, showed > 16-fold higher potency than that of 6b against MDR769 HIV-1 protease (Table 1). Similarly, 6a showed >30- and >50-fold higher potency over the peptides 6e and 6f respectively. 6a showed >170- to >220-fold higher potency compared to 6c and other peptides respectively, in the series screened against the expanded active site cavity of MDR769 HIV-1 protease (Table 1). The two short peptides (7a and 7b) were evaluated individually and also as a combined mixture. The potency of 7a and 7b, either individually or together, was weaker compared to that of 6a, against MDR769 HIV-1 protease. While 6a and 6b showed similar potency against both wild type (NL4-3) and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants, 6e showed good potency against NL4-3 than the MDR769. Based on the higher potency, the binding profile of 6a with MDR769 HIV-1 protease was further evaluated using ITC and NMR spectroscopy.
3.3. 6a shows favorable binding isotherms against NL4-3 and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants
ITC analysis showed favorable binding profiles for 6a against both NL4-3 and MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants. The binding isotherms including raw data for 6a are shown in Figure 2. The Kd values for 6a against NL4-3 and MDR769 were 86 μM and 68 μM respectively. Analysis of thermodynamic parameters revealed favorable binding affinities (Gibb's free energy), for 6a against both NL4-3 (ΔG: -5.60 ± 0.04 kcal/mol.) and MDR769 (ΔG: -5.82 ± 0.09 kcal/mol.) HIV-1 protease variants. Among the peptide series, 6a showed the best binding profile against MDR769 HIV-1 protease. In order to further investigate the poor binding profiles of the peptides in the series other than 6a, an effort to optimize the ITC analysis will need to be performed in the future.
3.4. Peptide-induced perturbations in the 15N-HSQC spectra
In order to confirm the binding of 6a to MDR769 HIV-1 protease, the 15N-HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled MDR769 HIV-1 protease in the presence and absence of 6a were obtained and analyzed. Analysis of the 15N-HSQC spectra of MDR769 HIV-1 protease in the presence and absence of lead peptide (6a) showed perturbations in the chemical shifts (either 1H or 15N or both). As shown in Figure S1, the overlay of the two spectra exhibits well-distributed peaks confirming the folded form of the protease in both cases. As shown in Figure 3, perturbations were seen both in and around the active site cavity. Peak splitting, peak shifting (examples shown in Figure 3) were seen in more than 50% of the peaks, indicating peptide induced conformational changes in the MDR769 HIV-1 protease. The peaks in the overlay of the spectra, as shown in Figure S1, show similar distribution to the peaks of MDR769 HIV-1 protease 15N-HSQC spectrum that was recently published by another group [26]. Based on the analysis of assigned peaks, Thr4, Trp6, Gln7, Ile10, Val11, Thr12, Gly16, Leu19, Lys20, Ala22, Leu23, Thr26, Gly27, Ala28, Asp29, Asp30, Val32, Asn37, Leu38, Trp42, Ile47, Gly48, Gly51, Lys55, Val56, Gln58, Tyr59, Glu65, Ile66, Lys70, Thr74, Val75, Leu76, Val77, Thr82, Asn83, Arg87, Asn88, Thr91, Gln92, Ile93, Gly94 and Cys95 were identified as the residues that showed major perturbations. Residues, Arg8, Gly17, Gln18, Glu34, Val36, Arg57, Asp60, Gln61, Val62, Gly68, His69, Met90 and Leu97 showed minor perturbations. Very small to negligible perturbations were seen for residues Gly2, Ile3, Ile13, Ile15, Leu24, Leu33, Gly40, Arg41, Lys43, Leu46, Phe53, Ile72, Gly73, Thr80, Val84, Asn98, Phe99. Among the 43 residues that showed perturbations, 15 residues were identified to be from the expanded active site cavity that contribute to the ligand binding. These residues are mapped as red spheres in Figure 3. Similarly, among the residues that showed negligible perturbations, Leu24, Thr80 and Val84 were identified to be from the expanded active site cavity. In order to further understand the binding-interactions, docking analysis of 6a was performed.
Figure 3.

Mapping the residues from the perturbations in NMR 15N-HSQC spectra. Panel a shows MDR769 HIV-1 protease dimer (yellow color) with residues labeled from 1-99 and 101-199 for monomers 1 and 2, respectively. Domains that show perturbations upon addition of 6a are shown in red. Active site residues that showed major perturbations and are critical in ligand binding are highlighted as red spheres. Panel b shows selected peaks that show perturbations (peak shifting and peak splitting) upon addition of 6a. Blue and red peaks indicate before and after the addition of 6a, respectively, to the protease. The horizontal and vertical axes represent 1H (ppm) and 15N (ppm), respectively.
3.5. Docking models revealed multiple interactions between 6a and MDR769 HIV-1 protease
Molecular model of 6a was docked against two docking receptors, PDB IDs: 1TW7 (MDR769 HIV-1 protease with wide-open conformation of the flaps) and 3SO9 (MDR769 HIV-1 protease with closed conformation of the flaps). These docking models of 6a helped in mapping new binding sites in the expanded active site of the MDR769 HIV-1 protease that may be targeted in designing future potent PIs. As shown in Figure 4, 6a shows multiple polar and hydrophobic contacts with MDR769 HIV-1 protease docking receptor – 3SO9. The total number of polar contacts made by 6a with 1TW7 and 3SO9 were 3 and 7, respectively. Similarly, the total number of hydrophobic contacts made by 6a with 1TW7 and 3SO9 were 28 and 37, respectively. This indicates enhanced binding profile of 6a to the protease with closed flap conformation. Additionally, when 3SO9 was used as docking receptor, the binding profile of 6a was similar to that of substrate (CA/p2) peptide (PDB ID: 1DAZ).
Figure 4.

Docking model of 6a showing contacts. Docking model of 6a is shown as white stick model in the active site of MDR769 HIV-1 protease with closed flaps (PDB ID: 3SO9). Protease residues involved in polar and hydrophobic contacts with 6a are highlighted as green stick models. Polar contacts are shown as black dashed-lines. The catalytic Asp25 and Asp125 are shown as red stick models. Protease residues are labeled 1-99 and 101-199 for monomers 1 and 2, respectively.
4. Discussion
4.1. 6a shows favorable inhibition and binding profiles against MDR769 HIV-1 protease
The current study shows that by using the scanning Ala/Phe chemical mutagenesis approach to mimic the natural substrate co-evolution process, one can identify a lead peptide-inhibitor with restored induced-fit against the MDR769 HIV-1 protease with expanded active site cavity and wide-open flaps. Comparative analysis of the potencies of peptide-inhibitors 6a-g revealed that replacement of Val (P2), Leu (P1) or Glu (P2') with Ala (less bulky side chain) resulted in 17-, >227- or 53-fold loss in potency, respectively, against MDR769 HIV-1 protease. Similarly, replacement of Val (P2), Leu (P1) or Glu (P2') with Phe (bulky side chain) resulted in 175-, 32-or >227-fold loss of potency, respectively, against MDR769 HIV-1 protease. Thus, Val at P2, Leu at P1 and Glu at P2' positions are critical and required for the potency of 6a against MDR769 HIV-1 protease. The peptide-inhibitors, 6f and 6g reconfirmed the importance of Glu at P2' position as reported previously [27]. Further, addition of a hydroxyl group between P1 and P1' residues of 6a might increase its potency by enhancing the binding affinity. Considering the higher potency of 6a (Table 1), in combination with favorable binding profile (ΔG: -5.82 ± 0.09 kcal/mol.) against MDR769 HIV-1 protease, which exhibits expanded active site cavity and wide-open flaps, 6a can be used as a lead peptide to design future potent small molecule PIs.
4.2. Binding of 6a to MDR769 HIV-1 protease may induce partial if not complete flap closure
The perturbations observed in the 15N-HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled MDR769 HIV-1 protease in the presence and absence of 6a confirmed its binding in the expanded active site cavity of MDR769 HIV-1 protease. Among the residues with major perturbations, 17 were identified from flap region that contribute to the protease flap open/close mechanism and 15 were from the expanded active site cavity suggesting major ligand-induced conformational changes in the wide-open flaps and may imply that 6a induces complete flap closure in MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants yielding nanomolar potency. Docking analysis of 6a against MDR769 HIV-1 protease receptor revealed multiple polar and hydrophobic contacts with 25 residues among which, 14 residues showed major perturbations in the NMR spectrum confirming the ligand binding. Residues Thr80, Pro81 and Val84 showed contacts in the docking models but did not show significant perturbations suggesting that these residues may be involved in tighter binding with 6a without major conformational changes. Of note, 6a showed a conserved polar contact with Thr80 in both receptors, 1TW7 and 3SO9. Thr80 is an amino acid that rarely undergoes mutation in the HIV-1 protease gene and the conserved polar contact with Thr80 might in part explain the higher potency of 6a against MDR769 HIV-1 protease.
4.3. Closed flap docking receptor shows enhanced contacts with 6a
MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants (PDB IDs; 1TW7, 3OQ7, 3OQA, 3OQD and 3PJ6) are known to show wide-open conformation of the flaps due to accumulation of multiple mutations. In order to understand the binding profile of 6a in the active site cavity of such wide-open flaps containing receptor, 1TW7 was used as receptor. This method (using 1TW7 as docking receptor) showed the adaptation of peptide conformation in the expanded active site cavity. On the other hand, the docking method using 3SO9 as receptor depicts the peptide induced complete flap closure of the MDR protease. Due to closed flap conformation of the receptor (3SO9), 6a showed enhanced polar contacts (increased from a total of 3 polar contacts to a total of 7 polar contacts) as well as hydrophobic contacts (increased from a total of 28 hydrophobic contacts to a total of 37 hydrophobic contacts) compared to that of 1TW7. Enhanced binding profile with more contacts in the active site cavity of receptor 3SO9 suggests that 6a may induce complete flap closure in MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants yielding nanomolar potency.
Taken together, the current structure-activity studies confirmed the hypothesis that the scanning Ala/Phe chemical mutagenesis approach mimicking the substrate co-evolution would yield a better induced-fit. Considering the higher potency, 6a can be used as a lead peptide to design future potent small molecule PIs against MDR variants of HIV-1 protease that exhibit expanded active site cavity and wide-open flaps. However, 6a may not be used as a therapeutic as is, due to its peptidic nature, which may cause poor cell penetration properties.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Inhibitors against MDR HIV-1 protease were designed, synthesized and evaluated.
Lead peptide (6a) showed potent inhibition (IC50: 4.4 nM) of MDR HIV-1 protease.
6a showed favorable binding isotherms against NL4-3 and MDR proteases.
6a induced perturbations in the 15N-HSQC spectrum of MDR HIV-1 protease.
Molecular modeling suggested that 6a may induce total flap closure in MDR protease.
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institutes of Health for funding to LCK (grant#AI65294) and IMSD/MBRS fellowship to JMM (NIH-R25GM058905).
Abbreviations
- PI
Protease inhibitors
- FDA
Food and drug administration
- CA/p2
Capsid/short peptide
- HSQC
Heteronuclear single quantum coherence
- FRET
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer
Footnotes
Supporting Information. The overlay of 15N-HSQC spectra of MDR769 HIV-1 protease and synthesis, HPLC/ESI-MS analysis of peptide-inhibitors are available as supporting information.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Ghosh AK, Chapsal BD, Weber IT, Mitsuya H. Design of HIV protease inhibitors targeting protein backbone: an effective strategy for combating drug resistance. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:78–86. doi: 10.1021/ar7001232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meek TD, Dayton BD, Metcalf BW, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease expressed in Escherichia coli behaves as a dimeric aspartic protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:1841–1845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lebon F, Ledecq M. Approaches to the design of effective HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2000;7:455–477. doi: 10.2174/0929867003375146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Debouck C. The HIV-1 protease as a therapeutic target for AIDS. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1992;8:153–164. doi: 10.1089/aid.1992.8.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shultz MD, Ham YW, Lee SG, et al. Small-molecule dimerization inhibitors of wild-type and mutant HIV protease: a focused library approach. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:9886–9887. doi: 10.1021/ja048139n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Perryman AL, Zhang Q, Soutter HH, et al. Fragment-based screen against HIV protease. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2010;75:257–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00943.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.DeVoss JJ, Sui Z, DeCamp DL, et al. Haloperidol-based irreversible inhibitors of the HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteases. J Med Chem. 1994;37:665–673. doi: 10.1021/jm00031a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mimoto T, Imai J, Tanaka S, et al. Rational design and synthesis of a novel class of active site-targeted HIV protease inhibitors containing a hydroxymethylcarbonyl isostere. Use of phenylnorstatine or allophynylnorstatine as a transition-state mimic. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1991;39:2465–2467. doi: 10.1248/cpb.39.2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Perelson AS, Newmann AU, Markowitz M, et al. HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: virion clearance rate, infected cell life-span, and viral generation time. Science. 1996;271:1582–1586. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5255.1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Preston BD, Dougherty JP. Mechanisms of retroviral mutation. Trends Microbiol. 1996;4:16–21. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(96)81500-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Doyon L, Croteau G, Thibeault D, et al. Second locus involved in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to protease inhibitors. J Virol. 1996;70:3763–3769. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.6.3763-3769.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Palmer S, Shafer RW, Merigan TC. Highly drug-resistant HIV-1 clinical isolates are cross-resistant to many antiretroviral compounds in current clinical development. AIDS. 1999;13:661–667. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199904160-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martin P, Vickrey JF, Proteasa G, et al. “Wide-open” 1.3 Å structure of a multidrug-resistant HIV-1 protease as a drug target. Structure. 2005;13:1887–1895. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yedidi RS, Proteasa G, Martinez JL, et al. Contribution of the 80's loop of HIV-1 protease to the multidrug-resistance mechanism: crystallographic study of MDR769 HIV-1 protease variants. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67:524–532. doi: 10.1107/S0907444911011541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Logsdon BC, Vickrey JF, Martin P, et al. Crystal structures of a multi drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease reveal an expanded active-site cavity. J Virol. 2004;78:3123–3132. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.6.3123-3132.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yedidi RS, Liu Z, Wang Y, et al. Crystal structures of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 protease in complex with two potent anti-malarial compounds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;421:413–417. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.03.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vickrey JF, Logsdon BC, Proteasa G, et al. HIV-1 protease variants from 100-fold drug resistant clinical isolates: expression, purification, and crystallization. Protein Expr Purif. 2003;28:165–172. doi: 10.1016/s1046-5928(02)00650-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wishart DS, Bigam CG, Yao J, et al. 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shift referencing in biomolecular NMR. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:135–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00211777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Katoh E, Louis JM, Yamazaki T, et al. A solution NMR study of the binding kinetics and the internal dynamics of an HIV-1 protease-substrate complex. Protein Sci. 2003;12:1376–1385. doi: 10.1110/ps.0300703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Goddard TD, Kneller DG. SPARKY 3.0. University of California; San Francisco: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanner MF. Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J Mol Graph Model. 1999;17:57–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Urban J, Konvalinka J, Stehlikova J, et al. Reduced-bond tight-binding inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Fine tuning of the enzyme subsite specificity. FEBS Lett. 1992;298:9–13. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80010-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Richards AD, Phylip LH, Farmerie WG, et al. Sensitive, soluble chromogenic substrates for HIV-1 proteinase. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:7733–7736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang X, deVera IMS, Veloro AM, et al. Backbone 1H, 13C, and 15N chemical shift assignments for HIV-1 protease subtypes and multi-drug resistant variant MDR 769. Biomol NMR Assign. 2012:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s12104-012-9409-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weber IT, Wu J, Adomat J, et al. Crystallographic Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 Protease with an Analog of the Conserved CA-p2 Substrate—interactions with frequently occurring glutamic acid residue at P2' position of substrates. Eur J Biochem. 1997;249:523–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
