Macrophages are among the most abundant immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, where they are known as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Substantial evidence indicates that TAMs generally play protumoral roles in the primary as well as metastatic sites (Noy and Pollard, 2014). TAMs are also known to interfere with several tumor therapeutic modalities, such as chemotherapy, irradiation, and immunotherapy. In general, depletion of M2-like TAMs or reprogramming them into M1-like phenotype enhances the efficacy of these therapies (Rolny et al., 2011; de Palma and Lewis, 2013; Germano et al., 2013).
Chemotherapy has been shown to increase macrophage infiltration in human breast cancer tissues and the ratio of CD68/CD8 expression predicts the patient response to the treatment (DeNardo et al., 2011). TAMs have been known to promote breast cancer progression and increase therapy resistance through mechanisms such as the enhancement of angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation and invasiveness by producing growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and FGF2 (Jiang, 2014). However, improved efficacy of chemotherapy by the means of TAM depletion has been shown to be dependent on the enhanced anti-tumor activity of CD8+ T cells (DeNardo et al., 2011). How TAM suppresses CD8+ T cells was poorly known. Using two mouse breast cancer models, Ruffell et al. (2014) recently demonstrated that chemotherapy-induced macrophage infiltration suppresses dendritic cell (DC) production of IL-12, which in turn inhibits CD8+ T cell activity, and limits the efficacy of the chemotherapy. They first showed that macrophages express the highest levels of IL-10 among tumor infiltrating leukocytes, including Treg cells, which are known to be a major source of IL-10 in other murine tumor models (Stewart et al., 2013). IL-10 signaling blockade with an anti-IL-10R mAb improves the efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin therapies in the mouse mammary tumor virus-polyoma middle T (MMTV-PyMT) luminal B-type and the C3(1)-TAg triple negative breast cancer models, suggesting that IL-10 limiting the chemotherapy efficacy is a generalizable phenomenon in breast cancers. Anti-IL-10R mAb treatment was next shown to increase the number of infiltrated CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment, and depletion of CD8+ T cells ablated the beneficial effect of anti-IL-10R mAb, confirming that the therapeutic efficacy of anti-IL-10R mAb depends on the activity of CD8+ T cells. Ruffell et al. (2014) went on to show that anti-IL-10R mAb treatment does not affect macrophage recruitment as well as its polarization and function following chemotherapy; in addition, anti-IL-10R mAb also does not directly alter the proliferation and function of CD8+ T cells, suggesting that IL-10 may indirectly suppress CD8+ T cell activity by acting on another cell type. Indeed, they found that tumor infiltrating DCs express much high levels of IL-10R than that of CD8+ T cells. They next demonstrated that IL-10 suppresses DC production of IL-12, and blockade of the IL-12/IL-12R pathway abolished the beneficial effect of anti-IL-10R mAb. Because IL-12 is a cytokine known to promote CD8+ T cell proliferation and its effector function (Trinchieri, 2003), a novel mechanism by which macrophage suppresses the chemotherapeutic efficacy was established. This mechanism is that macrophage-produced IL-10 suppresses DC expression of IL-12, which then leads to decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration and activity and increased chemotherapy resistance. Ruffell et al. (2014) further validated some of their preclinical findings in patients. They showed that increased IL-10 expression is common in human breast cancer tissues, and high expression levels of IL-12A are associated with a better pathological complete response to chemotherapy.
In summary, Ruffell et al. (2014) have provided compelling evidence showing that the IL-10/IL-10R and IL-12/IL-12R pathways may play essential roles in the pathological response following breast cancer chemotherapy-induced TAM recruitment, and targeting these pathways may decrease chemotherapy resistance and improve the overall outcome.
References
- 1.de Palma M, Lewis CE. Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(3):277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.DeNardo DG, Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, et al. Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(1):54–67. doi: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-10-0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Germano G, Frapolli R, Belgiovine C, et al. Role of macrophage targeting in the antitumor activity of trabectedin. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(2):249–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jiang X. Harnessing the immune system for the treatment of breast cancer. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2014;15(1):1–15. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Noy R, Pollard JW. Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy. Immunity. 2014;41(1):49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rolny C, Mazzone M, Tugues S, et al. HRG inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by inducing macrophage polarization and vessel normalization through downregulation of PlGF. Cancer Cell. 2011;19(1):31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ruffell B, Chang-Strachan D, Chan V, et al. Macrophage IL-10 blocks CD8+ T cell-dependent responses to chemotherapy by suppressing IL-12 expression in intratumoral dendritic cells. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(5):623–637. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stewart CA, Metheny H, Iida N, et al. Interferon-dependent IL-10 production by Tregs limits tumor Th17 inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(11):4859–4874. doi: 10.1172/JCI65180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(2):133–146. doi: 10.1038/nri1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]