Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1974 Feb;5(2):133–138. doi: 10.1128/aac.5.2.133

Comparative Clinical Study of Tobramycin and Gentamicin

J Klastersky 1, C Hensgens 1, A Henri 1, D Daneau 1
PMCID: PMC428934  PMID: 4599859

Abstract

Gentamicin and tobramycin have been compared in vitro and as single-drug therapy in patients with a serious infection caused by gram-negative rods. In vitro, a slight advantage of tobramycin over gentamicin has been found against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cross-resistance between gentamicin and tobramycin has been observed for gentamicin-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa and Providence but was not always present. The clinical effectiveness of gentamicin and tobramycin was similar: 14 (45.1%) out of the 31 patients in each series responded favorably. The clinical results were much better in urinary tract infections (66% of favorable responses) than in wound infections, pulmonary infections, septicemia, and meningitis (26% of favorable responses). The frequency of adverse reactions encountered in the present series was similar for both drugs.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Crowe C. C., Sanders E. Is there complete cross-resistance of gram-negative bacilli to gentamicin and tobramycin? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Nov;2(5):415–416. doi: 10.1128/aac.2.5.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis W. W., Stout T. R. Disc plate method of microbiological antibiotic assay. II. Novel procedure offering improved accuracy. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Oct;22(4):666–670. doi: 10.1128/am.22.4.666-670.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klastersky J., Cappel R., Daneau D. Clinical significance of in vitro synergism between antibiotics in gram-negative infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Dec;2(6):470–475. doi: 10.1128/aac.2.6.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Klastersky J., Daneau D., de Maertelaer V. Comparative study of tobramycin and gentamicin with special reference to anti-pseudomonas activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1973 Jan-Feb;14(1):104–111. doi: 10.1002/cpt1973141104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Klastersky J., Geuning C., Mouawad E., Daneau D. Endotracheal gentamicin in bronchial infections in patients with tracheostomy. Chest. 1972 Feb;61(2):117–120. doi: 10.1378/chest.61.2.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meyer R. D., Young L. S., Armstrong D. Tobramycin (nebramycin factor 6): in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1147–1151. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1147-1151.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Traub W. H., Raymond E. A. Evaluation of the in vitro activity of tobramycin as compared with that of gentamicin sulfate. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jan;23(1):4–7. doi: 10.1128/am.23.1.4-7.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES