Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Carcinog Mutagen. 2013 Aug 5;Suppl 7:4. doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.S7-004

Signaling Networks of Activated Oncogenic and Altered Tumor Suppressor Genes in Head and Neck Cancer

Bin Yan 1, Robert Vander Broek 2,3, Anthony D Saleh 2, Arpita Mehta 2, Carter Van Waes 2, Zhong Chen 2,*
PMCID: PMC4289631  NIHMSID: NIHMS624968  PMID: 25587491

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) arises from the upper aerodigestive tract and is the six most common cancers worldwide. HNSCC is associated with high morbidity and mortality, as standard surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy can cause significant disfigurement and only provide 5-year survival rates of ~50–60%. The heterogeneity of HNSCC subsets with different potentials for recurrence and metastasis challenges the traditional pathological classification system, thereby increasing demand for the development of new diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools based on global molecular signatures of HNSCC. Historically, using classical biological techniques, it has been extremely difficult and time-consuming to survey hundreds or thousands of genes in a given disease. However, the development of high throughput technologies and high-powered computation throughout the last two decades has enabled us to investigate hundreds or thousands of genes simultaneously. Using high throughput technologies, our laboratory has identified the gene signatures and protein networks, which significantly affect HNSCC malignant phenotypes, including TP53/p63/p73 family members, IL-1/TNF-β/NF-κB, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, IL-6/IL-6R/JAK/STAT3, EGFR/MAPK/AP1, HGF/cMET/EGR1, and TGFβ/TGFβR/TAK1/SMAD pathways. This review summarizes the results from high-throughput technological assays conducted on HNSCC samples, including microarray, DNA methylation, miRNA profiling, and protein array, using primarily experimental data and conclusions generated in our own laboratory. The use of bioinformatics and integrated analyses of data sets from different platforms, as well as meta-analysis of large datasets pulled from multiple publicly available studies, provided significantly higher statistical power to extract biologically relevant information. The data suggested that the heterogeneity of HNSCC genotype and phenotype are much more complex than we previously thought. Understanding of global molecular signatures and disease classification for specific subsets of HNSCC will be essential to provide accurate diagnoses for targeted therapy and personalized treatment, which is an important effort toward improving patient outcomes.

Keywords: Oncogenes, Tumor suppressor genes, Gene profiling, miRNAs, Genetic alterations, DNA methylation

Introduction

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common cancer that arises from epithelia of the upper aerodigestive tract, which includes the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx [1]. There is an annual incidence of over 500,000 new cases of HNSCC worldwide, including 40,000 in the U.S. [1]. HNSCC of the oropharynx is associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection in ~25% of cases, while the remaining 75% are predominantly associated with tobacco use [1]. Standard therapies, which include surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, provide 5-year survival rates of ~50–60% in U.S., making HNSCC one of the most difficult cancers to treat and a common cause of cancer related deaths [1]. Because of the heterogeneity of HNSCC subsets with different potentials for recurrence and metastasis, the traditional pathological classification of HNSCC exhibits limitations in clinical diagnosis and prognosis. As such, there is a tremendous demand for the development of new diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools based on the molecular signatures of HNSCC.

Cancer is a complex genetic disease driven by the accumulation of genetic alterations and functional defects in multiple pathways. Gene signatures that define malignant phenotypes are usually under the regulation of a few transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) and tumor protein p53 (TP53). Previously, our laboratory discovered that the transcription factor NF-κB is aberrantly activated in HNSCC and serves to dysregulate a diverse repertoire of genes that promote cell proliferation, survival, inflammation, angiogenesis, tumorigenesis, and therapeutic resistance [2,3]. Our early studies have shown that constitutive activation of the NF-κB pathway through IL-1/TNF-α/IKK signaling and their downstream molecules contributes to tumorigenesis and metastasis in a murine Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) model [4,5], which is consistent with observations in human HNSCC cell lines, patient serum and tumor specimens [613]. NF-κB regulated gene signatures are associated with the recurrent and metastatic human HNSCC genetic subtypes [14]. Tobacco and HPV, which are known etiologic factors of importance in HNSCC, have subsequently been implicated in the activation of NF-κB [15,16]. Using high throughput technologies of gene profiling, protein array and tissue array, we have identified the gene signatures and protein networks responsible for reciprocal crosstalk between NF-κB and TP53, two key factors which significantly affect HNSCC malignant phenotypes [1720]. Further, we found that alternatively transcribed TP53 family members, such as ΔNp63 or TAp73 protein, orchestrate malignant phenotypes by forming protein or DNA binding complexes with NF-κB family members cREL and/or RELA. These complexes function as either repressors or synergistic agonists of TP53 and NF- κB activity [2123]. Concurrently, using both classical biological and high throughput approaches, we and collaborators have characterized multiple additional signaling pathways that cross-talk with NF-κB and TP53 family members, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR [24,25], IL-6/IL-6R/JAK/STAT3 [2628], EGFR/MAPK/AP1 [24,29,30], HGF/cMET/EGR1 [3133], and TGFβ/TGFβR/TAK1/SMAD [3437] pathways. Together, these pathways all contribute to the survival, migratory and angiogenic mechanisms which are important in the malignant phenotype of HNSCC.

In the past, the major challenge of identifying molecular signatures of HNSCC has been in overcoming the difficulties associated with surveying hundreds or thousands of genes or molecules, which is extremely time-consuming using classical biological techniques. However, in the last two decades, the advancement of high throughput technology and high-powered computation has enabled us to investigate hundreds or thousands of genes simultaneously. Consequently, we are now in a technological era with the potential for the explosive dissemination of knowledge and information.

Microarray and Gene Expression Profiling of Tumor Lines

Alteration in expression profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppresser genes is fundamental to the classification of tumor phenotypes by stage, aggressiveness, heterogenic subsets, potential for recurrence and metastasis, and drug resistance [38]. Investigations of distinct gene profiling signatures reveal characteristics of tumor phenotypes in different cancer sub-populations, which leads to the identification of potential molecular biomarkers that are clinically useful for predicting prognosis and therapeutic efficacy [39,40]. Among the first groups to investigate molecular signatures of HNSCC, we pioneered the first generation of microarrays in relevant animal models and human cell lines.

Previously, we established a syngeneic and multiple-step murine SCC model in which the parental Pam 212 line exhibited low metastatic potential, while two cell lines derived from lymph node metastases, exhibited aggressive metastasis when reinoculated in vivo [41]. In this animal model, we found that the metastatic cell lines LY-2 and LY-8 displayed an increase in constitutive NF-κB activation and TNF-α inducible expression of proinflammatory cytokines, when compared with parental Pam 212 cells. The aberrant activation of NF-κB contributes to increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines during metastatic tumor progression [5]. These findings led us to identify changes in a broad gene expression profile of transformation and metastasis. mRNA differential display and cDNA array profiles enriched for cancer-associated genes were utilized to detect global expression differences among primary keratinocytes, parental Pam 212 cells and metastatic LY-2 cells [42]. We identified distinct malignant and metastatic gene signatures involved in growth and cell cycle (p21, p27, and cyclin D1), resistance and apoptosis (glutathione-S-transferase, cIAP-1/BIRC2, PEA-15, and Fas ligand), inflammation and angiogenesis [chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 (also called KC, human IL-8 homolog)], and signal transduction [c-Met, yes-associated protein (YAP), and syk]. Strikingly, 10 of 22 genes in the cluster expressed in metastases have been associated with activation of the NF-κB signal pathway. Subsequently, we showed that NF-κB-inducible cytokine Gro-1 was able to promote tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis in vivo [43]. Many of these candidates have been validated as important oncogenic and tumor suppressor genes which contribute to HNSCC malignant and metastatic phenotype.

Next, we performed a cDNA microarray in a panel of HNSCC lines and showed that gene expression signatures of tumor subsets were related to NF-κB activation and/or deficient or mutated TP53. Bioinformatic analysis of the promoters and ontogeny of these clustered genes revealed two groups of HNSCC exhibiting distinct gene signatures: one set enriched for a higher prevalence of TP53 promoter binding motifs, and a second set enriched for injury response genes with NF-κB regulatory motifs. The results were confirmed with immunohistochemical staining, ChIP assays assessing promoter binding of NF-κB, and functional assays with siRNA mediated gene knockdown [18,20]. We concluded that NF-κB promotes cell survival and expression of a novel gene signature in HNSCC with deficient wildtype TP53, a subset previously associated with greater resistance to chemo-radio-therapy and worse prognosis. Thus, our early work using microarray profiling in murine tumor models and HNSCC cell lines revealed novel gene expression signatures that distinguished cancer cell subsets associated with NF-κB and/or TP53 activation status.

Meta-Analysis of Gene Profiling in HNSCC Tissue Specimens

Genome-wide microarray technology has been in place for more than a decade. Over this period of time, massive microarray datasets have become available from a broad sample of HNSCC patient specimens representative of varying pathological conditions, including pre-malignant lesions, and primary, metastatic, and recurrent tumors [44,45]. A systemic study collected 63 published microarray datasets of HNSCC tissues and performed meta-analysis of gene sets [45]. These microarray studies cover hundreds of HNSCC tumor samples derived from a variety of anatomic sites such as oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. Forty one of the 63 microarray datasets in this study analyzed primary tumor tissues vs. normal mucosa. Meta-analysis of these datasets has generated lists of gene sets that exhibit statistically significant differences between tumor and normal. For example, a list of 25 genes differentially expressed in primary tumors was identified in at least 9 of the 41 studies. These 25 genes are primarily involved in the biological processes of collagen metabolism, cell adhesion and migration, extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interactions, and inflammation. The strongest gene signature revealed 16 genes, which were consistently observed in more than 10 microarray datasets of HNSCC. Ten genes were overexpressed in the primary tumors compared to normal mucosal tissues, including COL1A2, FN1, IFI6, ITGA6, MMP1, PLAU, POSTN, SPP1, SPARC and TNC. Conversely, decreased expression of 6 genes, ECM1, EMP1, KRT4, KRT13, MAL, and TGM3 was consistently observed in tumor specimens. In another analysis of 23 HNSCC gene expression profile studies, a panel of nine genes including FN1, MMP1, PLAU, SPARC, IL1RN, KRT4, KRT13, MAL and TGM3, was identified as a set of molecular markers with potential clinical diagnostic value [46]. These nine genes overlapped with the 16-gene panel from the previous meta-analysis, and were validated in tumors and matched normal mucosa using qRT-PCR. Each genes’ individual clinical relevance was subsequently evaluated according to statistical significance [46]. Notable among the genes in that panel, MMP1 was consistently over-expressed in 13 of 41 microarray studies of tumor tissues from the meta-analysis [45], as well as in 9 of 23 microarrays in the second study, which was validated in 51 saliva samples from head and neck cancer patients [46]. Although these genes were identified in primary tumors, their functions are highly related to processes involved in metastasis, such as cell adhesion, motility and migration [4749]. Consequently, these gene signatures could be tested in future clinical studies as candidate biomarkers in the primary tumor for predicting metastatic potential.

Similarly, a meta-analysis of 507 HNSCC tissue samples with different metastatic statuses was conducted on 20 published microarray studies [45]. A panel of 25 genes was identified to be differentially expressed in 3 or more studies of metastatic tumor tissues compared with non-metastatic tumor tissues. Importantly, in at least 4 studies, 5 genes upregulated in metastatic tissues are overlapped with genes observed to be upregulated in primary tumors. The overlapped panel of up-regulated genes includes FN1, MMP1, PLAU, POSTN, and TNC. Additionally, down-regulated TGM3 was consistently found in 4 metastatic microarray studies [45]. These data further suggest that this gene signature in HNSCC primary tumors could serve as a predictor for metastatic disease. Several other studies utilized gene expression profiling to predict the clinical outcomes of HNSCC, such as the risk of recurrence and patient survival [5054]. Overexpressed MMP1 and POSTN were identified in both lymph node positive and recurrent tumors, revealing their roles in predicting HNSCC recurrence [54]. Extracellular matrix proteins PLAU, SERPINE1 and SPARC were validated as prognostic markers for predicting overall survival of HNSCC patients [55]. In addition, Chung et al. defined a 75-gene list for determining disease recurrence in 60 HNSCC patients, and suggested the list as a prognostic biomarker of recurrence and molecular predictor of epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition [53]. Consistent with our findings in murine tumor metastasis models and human HNSCC cell line models, Chung found a strong gene signature associated with NF-κB activation that may serve as a target for novel therapies for patients at high risk of standard-of-care treatment failure.

However, there are certain limitations to our interpretations of microarray studies which are caused by differing sample sizes and divergent sources, differing technologies or platforms employed, and differing data analysis methods with varying resolutions. This can lead to low consistency among multiple reports. These limitations can be addressed by integrating large numbers of datasets from multiple independent but related microarray studies. Meta-analysis of multiple large sample-sized microarrays of HNSCC tissues can enhance reliability and generalizability of the genome-wide expression profiles, which generates more precise and clinically useful biomarkers for HNSCC.

DNA Methylation in HNSCC

One important regulatory mechanism of profoundly altered gene expression in cancer is through DNA methylation. As a type of epigenetic modification in the human genome, methylation is able to govern gene expression by modifying DNA without altering the sequence. It is commonly known that DNA methylation and its interplay with other epigenetic events in human cancer, such as histone modification, is crucial to the regulation of genome function through changing chromatin architecture [56]. For example, inactivation of certain tumor-suppressor genes occurs as a consequence of hypermethylation within the promoter regions. Recent advances using high throughput technologies make it possible to efficiently analyze epigenetic effects of DNA methylation on gene expression in human cancer [5759], demonstrating a broad range of methylated genes in different cancer types [57,58,60,61]. The altered DNA methylation patterns in cancer have been proposed as candidates for the development of epigenetic biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic efficacy [57,61,62]. Experimentally, several methodologies have been developed to profile DNA methylation genome-wide, such as the use of methylation-specific endonucleases, bisulfite modification of unmethylated cytosines, and immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA fragments [63,64].

Silencing of tumor suppressor genes caused by the hypermethylation in HNSCC was proposed as an epigenetic mechanism that plays an important role in tumor initiation and progression [6366]. Several represented genes, TIMP3, p16 (CDKN2A), p14, MGMT, CDH1, RASSF1A and DAPK, are highly sensitive to methylation-induced repression in HNSCC tumor and saliva samples, and are directly associated with tumor development [6770]. In addition, a set of 15 candidate genes was tested for methylation status in HNSCC patients, of which CDH1, p16, DAPK, hMLH1, MGMT, MST1, RARβ, RASSF2, RASSF5 were more significantly hypermethylated on the promoters in tumors than matched normal mucosal tissues [71]. Furthermore, in contrast to hypermethylation, global hypomethylation is also an aberrant epigenetic modification in cancer, which induces genomic instability and contributes to cell transformation [56,63,65].

Multiple groups performed genome-wide methylation profiling experiments covering four hundred HNSCC patient samples, and found that DNA methylation patterns are characterized by promoter hypermethylation and global hypomethylation [7281]. We have summarized these 10 DNA methylation profile studies and have extracted the more frequently methylated genes in HNSCC patient samples [7281]. Among those affected genes, HOXA9 (homeobox A9) is the most frequently methylated, repeatedly showing promoter hypermethylation in 5 of the 10 HNSCC methylation profiling studies. The second most frequent site of promoter hypermethylation is on EYA4, which has been observed in 4 of the 10 methylation studies. In addition, we found 11 genes, EPHA5, HS3ST2, SOX17, ADCYAP1, AIM2, CALCA, DCC, EMR3, HOXA11, HTR1B and MME, were methylated in at least three HNSCC studies. Silencing of these genes was consistently observed in primary HNSCC when compared with normal mucosa, indicating the significance of epigenetic alterations in HNSCC pathogenesis. Together, these genes provide important clues for decoding HNSCC epigenomics and serve as potential targets for the discovery of diagnostic epigenetic biomarkers in HNSCC.

Identification of Genetic Alterations through Large-Scale Exome Sequencing

Large-scale, massively parallel sequencing has provided great insight into signaling pathways, which accelerates our understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying HNSCC and how to better tailor treatment for patients. High-powered, high-throughput analyses of tumor DNA copy number variations and mutations through massively parallel sequencing have provided powerful information that can be used to better identify genetic drivers of HNSCC development and progression. In one recent study of the mutational landscape in HNSCC, matched tumor and whole blood samples from 92 HNSCC patients were subjected to whole-exome sequencing and hybrid capture analysis [82]. In addition to validating previously reported genetic alterations in HNSCC, such as CCND1, MYC, EGFR, ERBB2, and CCNE1 amplifications, CDKN2A deletions, and TP53, CDKN2A, HRAS, PTEN, and PIK3CA mutations [38], this study implicated many genes which were previously unrecognized to be important players in HNSCC. Most notably, genes which regulate epidermal development and squamous differentiation, (e.g. NOTCH1, NOTCH2, NOTCH3, IRF6, and TP63), were observed to be mutated in over 30% of the samples. Other genes which mediate calcium-sensing (RIMS2 and PCLO) and nuclear polarity (SYNE1 and SYNE2), processes critical to squamous epithelial differentiation, also harbored mutations in subsets of 10–20% of the HNSCC samples studied. Besides the findings relevant to squamous differentiation, genes involved in apoptosis (CASP8 and DDX3X) and regulation of gene expression (PRDM9 and EZH2) were disrupted in 5–10% of cases.

In a second large-scale sequencing study conducted around the same time period, copy number analysis on 42 matched HNSCC tumor/normal pairs and sequencing of tumors from 32 patients was performed [83]. The findings complement the results of the study of 92 patient samples, in that NOTCH1 was one of the most frequently mutated genes. Interestingly, nearly 40% of the mutations in NOTCH1 were inactivating, which suggests that it may be acting as a tumor suppressor rather than an oncogene in HNSCC. The prevalence of mutations observed in an F-box protein family member, FBXW7, which targets NOTCH1 for degradation, were also speculated to play a role in modulating the NOTCH pathway in HNSCC.

Both of the previously mentioned studies substantiated many of the genes which were already understood to be critical and representative of HNSCC. Taken together, these studies also indicate the importance of the dysregulation of terminal epithelial differentiation in HNSCC, a finding which had not been fully appreciated previously. Finally, in non-HPV-associated HNSCC, it became apparent that more than four times as many mutations occur in tumor suppressor pathways compared to oncogenes [83]. This is an important consideration in the development of novel targeted therapies for HNSCC, as most are currently directed at oncogenes.

miRNA Profiling and Experimental Validation in HNSCC

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) comprise a highly conserved class of small RNA molecules (18–24 bp) that primarily bind to the 3′ UTR of mRNA molecules and either block translation or promote mRNA degradation. Alteration of miRNA gene expression due to genetic defects, such as DNA copy number variations or deregulation of miRNA expression, has been shown to contribute to carcinogenesis, including HNSCC. Several studies have reported global miRNA expression changes in HNSCC, using various samples sizes, anatomical sites, and profiling methodologies [8487]. The most consistently overexpressed miRNA in HNSCC is miR-21, which has been reported to be transcriptionally activated by NF-κB and STAT3 [8890]. Increased miR-21 has been reported to alter HNSCC cell survival, invasion, metastasis and resistance to chemotherapeutics [91]. The most frequently repressed miRNAs in HNSCC are the miRNA family members miR-99a, miR-100 [84], and miR-375 [9295]. All three of these miRNAs have been shown to target IGF-1R in HNSCC [84,96], which is frequently overexpressed in many cancers [97]. Three other repressed microRNAs in HNSCC have also been reported to target mRNAs that we have identified as increased in our meta-analysis. miR-29c has been linked to p53 expression [98,99], and has been reported to be reduced in nasopharyngeal SCC [100,101] and oral SCC [102]. miR-29 has been shown to target COL1A2, COL3A1, COL4A1, and SPARC [100,103] in nasopharyngeal SCC. miR-204 has been reported to be decreased in hypopharyngeal SCC [104,105] and targets IL-8 [106]. Finally miR-199b has been reported to be decreased in HNSCC [102,105,107] and targets LAMC2 [108]. These observations suggest a significant role for miRNAs in regulation of pro-metastatic and inflammatory pathways in HNSCC, and further investigation into miRNA regulation of aberrantly expressed mRNAs will undoubtedly help illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of HNSCC pathology.

Protein Arrays in HNSCC

Because separate patient tumors rely differently on individual cellular signaling pathways, protein signaling has become an important research focus. A better understanding of aberrations within these pathways will provide predictive and prognostic information and may also identify drug targets. In order to capture the signaling activity in these networks, the activated, phosphorylated state of a protein can be quantified through Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA). This technique generates snapshots of a patient’s cellular signaling network and, unlike gene expression analysis, will provide direct insight into post-translationally modified protein expression [109,110]. RPPAs are created by spotting denatured cellular lysate directly onto a nitrocellulose slide through a dilution curve. Plating multiple other samples and controls through RPPA allows a high throughput to be analyzed simultaneously with extremely sensitive analyte detection [109]. Validation is performed through Western blot and immunohistochemistry.

Studies investigating signaling pathways in HNSCC have enhanced our understanding of potential biomarkers and targeted therapies. Frederick et al. used RPPAs to examine 60 protein endpoints within previously untreated 23 HNSCC biopsy specimens and found 17 proteins decreased and 18 proteins elevated. The most significant protein elevations in tumor were checkpoint kinase p-Chk 1 (Ser 345), p-Chk (Ser33/35), eukarytotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 p-4E-BP1 (Ser65), protein kinase C p-PKC zeta/iota (Thr410/T412), p-LKB1 (Ser334), inhibitor of kappaB alpha p-IkB-α (Ser32), eukaryotic translation initiation factor4E p-eIF4E (Ser209), p-Smad2 (Ser465/67), insulin receptor substrate 1 p-IRS-1 (Ser612), p-MEK1/2 (Ser217/221), and total PKC iota [111]. Specifically, PKC iota protein plays a major role in upregulating the NF-κB pathway and provides new information for potential treatment. Its increased activity and expression is also seen in 70% of primary and squamous subtype non-small cell lung cancers [111]. However, the tissue in this study was surgically resected HNSCC tumor specimens and matched adjacent nonmalignant tissue, which raises some concern about the effects of field cancerization in the adjacent “normal” tissue.

Similarly, Wheeler et al. applied RPPA to assess the prognostic value of EGFR Y992 and Y1068 within 67 HNSCC fresh frozen tumors from patients prospectively enrolled in surgery without an EGFR targeted agent [112]. The study used IHC to evaluate 154 patients in this cohort as well as 39 patients treated with chemoradiation involving EGFR targeted antibody cetuximab [112]. Elevated expression of total EGFR and phosphorylated EGFR PY1068 were independently significantly associated with reduced survival in the surgery cohort. STAT3 signaling downstream of EGFR PY1068 may be significant, and EGFR PY1068 had prognostic value in the HPV-negative cohort [112]. Tumor EGFR levels by IHC were associated with survival while EGFR levels by RPPA were not, which is speculated to be due to inherent differences in antibody and assay performance [112,113].

In our laboratory, Pernas et al. used RPPAs to investigate the effects of a drug targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), gefitinib, in HNSCC signaling pathways [30]. We tested p-EGFR (Tyr1068), p-AKT (Ser473), p-ERK(Thr202/204), p-RelA/p65(Ser536), p-STAT3(Tyr703), and each respective phospho-protein’s total protein level by RPPA in two HNSCC cell lines treated with EGF and gefitinib. We then validated the results obtained by RPPA with results previously obtained using Western blot and ELISA, observing similar trends in EGF activation or gefitinib inhibition of EGFR and downstream molecules. In addition, we performed RPPA on tumor lysates procured from 10 patients prior to gefitinib therapy, and 7 days after gefitinib treatment. Consistent with immunohistochemistry data, a broad decrease in RPPA staining of EGFR and downstream signaling molecules (10 of 13 biomarkers) was observed in a responder patient after gefitinib treatment, including the molecules involved in the AKT, ERK, STAT3, and NF-κB pathways. In addition, increased staining in cleaved caspase 3 was observed only in the specimen from the gefitinib responder, consistent with the increase in apoptosis detected by TUNEL assay in the same tumor specimen. In contrast, in a molecular non-responder patient, increased p-MEK, STAT3, p-STAT3, and p-NF-κB, were observed without increase in cleaved caspase 3. We concluded that the activation status of signaling components of downstream pathways of EGFR such as AKT, ERK, STAT3, and NF-κB contributed to the sensitivity and could serve as potential biomarkers of gefitinib in HNSCC patients [30].

Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Analyses

The availability of massive datasets from large-scaled high throughput technologies creates the challenge of how to effectively analyze, integrate and interpret the data to reveal biological significance. Development of more sophisticated bioinformatics tools has become an effective approach to dissecting the complexity in biological functions behind the data generated from high throughput analyses. Gene expression is not a random event, but rather regulated by a coordinated operation of transcriptional and epigenetic factors in specific ways (activation or inhibition). Uncovering the combinatorial regulation among these factors is critical to understanding molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development and progression. Systems biology modeling of multi-dimensional resources and reconstruction of gene regulatory networks provides a solution to the complexity of information created with new technologies [114116]. Previously, we employed a combined computational and experimental approach to determine two distinct gene signatures associated with TP53 mutation status and NF-κB regulatory activity [18]. The analysis revealed that transcription factors TP53, NF-κB, and AP1 are important determinants of the heterogeneous pattern of gene expression in HNSCC, while STAT3 and EGR1 may broadly enhance gene expression levels in HNSCC cells. Furthermore, we have experimentally validated these transcription factors, NF-κB, TP53, AP1, STAT3 and EGR1, in modulation of gene expression in HNSCC cells [17,26,33,117,118]. Following this study, we applied a statistical method called COGRIM (based on Bayesian hierarchical model with Gibbs sampling) that was able to integrate heterogeneous data to capture transcription factor-gene associations [19]. We identified three sets of NF-κB regulons consisting of 748 target genes and the distinct signaling pathways of HNSCC cell subgroups associated with different TP53 mutational status [19]. The predicted NF-κB target genes were experimentally validated by modulation with TNF-α or siRNA for RelA and NFκB1, and by demonstration of binding activity of the two NF-κB subunits to the promoter oligonucleotides [19].

To unravel NF-κB, AP1, p53, STAT3 and EGR1 regulatory interactions, we developed a integrative model that utilizes matrix decomposition under constraints of sparseness, which combines gene expression profiling and binding data of multiple regulators (transcription factors and miRNAs) for inferring gene regulatory networks [119]. Using this method, two transcriptional regulatory programs of seven key transcription factors (NF-κB, AP1, CEBPB, EGR1, TP53, SP1 and STAT3) were defined in two types of HNSCC cell lines (wild type and mutant TP53 status). Ten target genes (CDKN1A, CSF2, ELF3, FBXL11, IGFBP3, IL6, NDRG1, PTGS2, SERPINE1 and TOB1) were shared by the networks of both wild type and mutant TP53 cell lines [119]. Furthermore, it is known that two miRNAs, oncogenic miR-21 and tumor suppressor miR-34 family are aberrantly expressed in HNSCC [84,85,87] and that they target p53 or NF-κB pathways [120123]. We performed the newly developed bioinformatics model to infer gene networks co-regulated by NF-κB, p53, miR-21 and miR-34ac in HNSCC cell lines [119]. Interestingly, several genes in the network are related to metastatic processes, such as angiogenesis (IL8), cell adhesion (SPP1 and TNC), and proteolysis (MMP1 and PLAU). They are in accordance with the meta-analysis of microarray data of HNSCC tissues [45]. We further constructed similar transcription factor-miRNA networks by analyzing gene expression microarray data from metastatic and non-metastatic tissues in hypopharyngeal [124] and oral cancers [125]. As shown in Table 1, 21 genes from metastatic hypopharyngeal cancer and 41 genes from metastatic oral cavity cancer, including 9 shared, were identified as the targets of NF-κB, TP53 and the two miRNAs [119]. Among those genes, 11 from hypopharyngeal and 13 from oral cavity are overlapped with genes identified in the networks of HNSCC cell lines [119]. There are 4 genes, MMP1, PLAU, SPP1 and TNC, identified in the microarray meta-analyses of both primary tumor and metastasis [45], supporting their biological significance, as well as the consistence of studies between cell lines and patient tissues. These computational and bioinformatics pipelines have provided important tools for showing the cross-regulation among NF-κB, TP53, and miRNAs, which may provide insights into the complex regulatory mechanisms underlying HNSCC development.

Table 1.

NF-κB, p53, miR-21 and miR-34ac targeted gene programs of HNSCC tissues.

Cancer location Genes in the network
Hypopharyngeal ALOX12B, CCL4, CD48, IGFBP3, IRF4, LAMB3, LDHA, PCBP1, S100A2, SFN, SPP1, TMEM109
Oral cavity ARHGAP1, ASS1, BCL2, BHMT, BMP4, CEP57, COL1A2, CPEB3, CR2, CSF1, CXCR5, DNAJC16, FAS, GNLY, GPR64, GZMB, HNRNPK, IER3, IFNB1, MMP9, NFKB2, NOD2, PERP, PLA2G4A, PLAU, PSMA2, SEMA4C, SERPINE1, SERPINF1, STAT4, TGFBI, TNC
Both locations ALDOA, IL1B, IL6, IL8, MMP1, PTX3, SELE, TP63, TPM1,

The target genes of transcription factors and miRNAs were predicted using the matrix decomposition-based method, based on microarray datasets of hypopharyngeal [124] and oral [125] metastatic vs. non-metastatic tumor tissues. Genes are presented as uniquely identified in hypopharyngeal cancer or oral cancer, or as appearing in both locations. Genes in bold are consistent with those genes differentially expressed and predicted to be under the regulation of NF-κB and TP53 in HNSCC cell lines with different TP53 mutation status [18,19].

Conclusion

The accumulation of genetic alterations and functional defects in multiple pathways leads to cancer development. Recent high throughput sequencing data further confirm that HNSCC is among the cancer types with the highest genomic variation [126]. Given this information, it is unlikely that durable responses can be achieved in most HNSCC patients using any single “magic bullet” therapy, as is the case for chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving BCR-ABL inhibitors [127]. However, in order to overcome the complexity of the HNSCC genetic landscape, the use of high throughput technologies to generate unbiased global analysis of genetic and phenotypic defects, as well as bioinformatics to integrate information from large datasets derived from multiple sources, can help to expedite and streamline our ability to deepen the understanding about this disease process. The Cancer Genome Atlas project (http://cancergenome.nih.gov) focusing on HNSCC is such a collective effort, which has recently completed high throughput sequencing with different platforms and protein arrays of more than 300 HNSCC specimens. This project will provide more precise and unbiased genome-wide analysis of genetic and phenotypic variations of HNSCC. Currently, we are in an era capable of dissecting cancer genotypes and phenotypes in a more global and comprehensive way. Together with previously validated experimental results, these large sets of data provide a unique opportunity and challenge to translate genetic information into clinically useful interventions to benefit HNSCC patients.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by intramural projects ZIA-DC-000073, ZIA-DC-000074 (ADS, RVB, CVW, ZC).

References

  • 1.Abraham J, Gulley JL, Allegra CJ. Bethesda handbook of clinical oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. xix.p. 662. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Waes C. Nuclear factor-kappaB in development, prevention, and therapy of cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1076–1082. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen Z, Yan B, Van Waes C. The Role of the NF-kappaB Transcriptome and Proteome as Biomarkers in Human Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Biomark Med. 2008;2:409–426. doi: 10.2217/17520363.2.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith CW, Chen Z, Dong G, Loukinova E, Pegram MY, et al. The host environment promotes the development of primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas that constitutively express proinflammatory cytokines IL-1alpha, IL-6, GM-CSF, and KC. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1998;16:655–664. doi: 10.1023/a:1006559811429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dong G, Chen Z, Kato T, Van Waes C. The host environment promotes the constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappaB and proinflammatory cytokine expression during metastatic tumor progression of murine squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3495–3504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen Z, Colon I, Ortiz N, Callister M, Dong G, et al. Effects of interleukin-1alpha, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, and neutralizing antibody on proinflammatory cytokine expression by human squamous cell carcinoma lines. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3668–3676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wolf JS, Chen Z, Dong G, Sunwoo JB, Bancroft CC, et al. IL (interleukin)-1alpha promotes nuclear factor-kappaB and AP-1-induced IL-8 expression, cell survival, and proliferation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1812–1820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duffey DC, Chen Z, Dong G, Ondrey FG, Wolf JS, et al. Expression of a dominant-negative mutant inhibitor-kappaBalpha of nuclear factor-kappaB in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma inhibits survival, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3468–3474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen Z, Malhotra PS, Thomas GR, Ondrey FG, Duffey DC, et al. Expression of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:1369–1379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Allen C, Duffy S, Teknos T, Islam M, Chen Z, et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB- related serum factors as longitudinal biomarkers of response and survival in advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3182–3190. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Duffy SA, Taylor JM, Terrell JE, Islam M, Li Y, et al. Interleukin-6 predicts recurrence and survival among head and neck cancer patients. Cancer. 2008;113:750–757. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van Tubergen E, Vander Broek R, Lee J, Wolf G, Carey T, et al. Tristetraprolin regulates interleukin-6, which is correlated with tumor progression in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:2677–2689. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Van Tubergen EA, Banerjee R, Liu M, Vander Broek R, Light E, et al. Inactivation or loss of TTP promotes invasion in head and neck cancer via transcript stabilization and secretion of MMP9, MMP2, and IL-6. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1169–1179. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chung CH, Parker JS, Ely K, Carter J, Yi Y, et al. Gene expression profiles identify epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and activation of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling as characteristics of a high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8210–8218. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rohrer J, Wuertz BR, Ondrey F. Cigarette smoke condensate induces nuclear factor kappa-b activity and proangiogenic growth factors in aerodigestive cells. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1609–1613. doi: 10.1002/lary.20972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.James MA, Lee JH, Klingelhutz AJ. Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 activates NF-kappaB, induces cIAP-2 expression, and protects against apoptosis in a PDZ binding motif-dependent manner. J Virol. 2006;80:5301–5307. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01942-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Friedman J, Nottingham L, Duggal P, Pernas FG, Yan B, et al. Deficient TP53 expression, function, and cisplatin sensitivity are restored by quinacrine in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6568–6578. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yan B, Yang X, Lee TL, Friedman J, Tang J, et al. Genome-wide identification of novel expression signatures reveal distinct patterns and prevalence of binding motifs for p53, nuclear factor-kappaB and other signal transcription factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R78. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yan B, Chen G, Saigal K, Yang X, Jensen ST, et al. Systems biology-defined NF-kappaB regulons, interacting signal pathways and networks are implicated in the malignant phenotype of head and neck cancer cell lines differing in p53 status. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R53. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee TL, Yang XP, Yan B, Friedman J, Duggal P, et al. A novel nuclear factor-kappaB gene signature is differentially expressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in association with TP53 status. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5680–5691. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.King KE, Ponnamperuma RM, Allen C, Lu H, Duggal P, et al. The p53 homologue DeltaNp63alpha interacts with the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway to modulate epithelial cell growth. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5122–5131. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang X, Lu H, Yan B, Romano RA, Bian Y, et al. ΔNp63 versatilely regulates a Broad NF-κB gene program and promotes squamous epithelial proliferation, migration, and inflammation. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3688–3700. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lu HYX, Chen Z, Van Waes C. TNF-a induced c-REL interacts with Np63, displacing TAp73 to inhibit growth arrest and apoptosis in head and neck cancers. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bancroft CC, Chen Z, Yeh J, Sunwoo JB, Yeh NT, et al. Effects of pharmacologic antagonists of epidermal growth factor receptor, PI3K and MEK signal kinases on NF-kappaB and AP-1 activation and IL-8 and VEGF expression in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma lines. Int J Cancer. 2002;99:538–548. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Herzog A, Bian Y, Vander Broek R, Hall B, Coupar J, et al. PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor PF-04691502 Antitumor Activity Is Enhanced with Induction of Wild-Type TP53 in Human Xenograft and Murine Knockout Models of Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:3808–3819. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lee TL, Yeh J, Friedman J, Yan B, Yang X, et al. A signal network involving coactivated NF-kappaB and STAT3 and altered p53 modulates BAX/BCL-XL expression and promotes cell survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1987–1998. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hong SH, Ondrey FG, Avis IM, Chen Z, Loukinova E, et al. Cyclooxygenase regulates human oropharyngeal carcinomas via the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6: a general role for inflammation? FASEB J. 2000;14:1499–1507. doi: 10.1096/fj.14.11.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee TL, Yeh J, Van Waes C, Chen Z. Epigenetic modification of SOCS-1 differentially regulates STAT3 activation in response to interleukin-6 receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling through JAK and/or MEK in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:8–19. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bancroft CC, Chen Z, Dong G, Sunwoo JB, Yeh N, et al. Coexpression of proangiogenic factors IL-8 and VEGF by human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involves coactivation by MEK-MAPK and IKK-NF-kappaB signal pathways. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:435–442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pernas FG, Allen CT, Winters ME, Yan B, Friedman J, et al. Proteomic signatures of epidermal growth factor receptor and survival signal pathways correspond to gefitinib sensitivity in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2361–2372. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dong G, Chen Z, Li ZY, Yeh NT, Bancroft CC, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-induced activation of MEK and PI3K signal pathways contributes to expression of proangiogenic cytokines interleukin-8 and vascular endothelial growth factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5911–5918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dong G, Lee TL, Yeh NT, Geoghegan J, Van Waes C, et al. Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma cells that overexpress c-Met exhibit enhanced angiogenesis factor expression, scattering and metastasis in response to hepatocyte growth factor. Oncogene. 2004;23:6199–6208. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Worden B, Yang XP, Lee TL, Bagain L, Yeh NT, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor differentially regulates expression of proangiogenic factors through Egr-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7071–7080. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Loukinova E, Chen Z, Van Waes C, Dong G. Expression of proangiogenic chemokine Gro 1 in low and high metastatic variants of Pam murine squamous cell carcinoma is differentially regulated by IL-1alpha, EGF and TGF-beta1 through NF-kappaB dependent and independent mechanisms. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:637–644. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cohen J, Chen Z, Lu SL, Yang XP, Arun P, et al. Attenuated transforming growth factor beta signaling promotes nuclear factor-kappaB activation in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3415–3424. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bian Y, Terse A, Du J, Hall B, Molinolo A, et al. Progressive tumor formation in mice with conditional deletion of TGF-beta signaling in head and neck epithelia is associated with activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5918–5926. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Freudlsperger C, Bian Y, Contag Wise S, Burnett J, Coupar J, et al. TGF-β and NF-κB signal pathway cross-talk is mediated through TAK1 and SMAD7 in a subset of head and neck cancers. Oncogene. 2013;32:1549–1559. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van ‘t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–536. doi: 10.1038/415530a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, et al. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:262–272. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen Z, Smith CW, Kiel D, Van Waes C. Metastatic variants derived following in vivo tumor progression of an in vitro transformed squamous cell carcinoma line acquire a differential growth advantage requiring tumor-host interaction. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1997;15:527–537. doi: 10.1023/a:1018474910432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dong G, Loukinova E, Chen Z, Gangi L, Chanturita TI, et al. Molecular profiling of transformed and metastatic murine squamous carcinoma cells by differential display and cDNA microarray reveals altered expression of multiple genes related to growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and the NF-kappaB signal pathway. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4797–4808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Loukinova E, Dong G, Enamorado-Ayalya I, Thomas GR, Chen Z, et al. Growth regulated oncogene-alpha expression by murine squamous cell carcinoma promotes tumor growth, metastasis, leukocyte infiltration and angiogenesis by a host CXC receptor-2 dependent mechanism. Oncogene. 2000;19:3477–3486. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu X, Kolokythas A, Wang J, Huang H, Zhou X. Gene Expression Signatures of Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral Cancer: Molecular Characteristics and Clinical Significances. Curr Cancer Ther Rev. 2010;6:294–307. doi: 10.2174/157339410793358066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yu YH, Kuo HK, Chang KW. The evolving transcriptome of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lallemant B, Evrard A, Combescure C, Chapuis H, Chambon G, et al. Clinical relevance of nine transcriptional molecular markers for the diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in tissue and saliva rinse. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:370. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen ZG. Exploration of metastasis-related proteins as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2007;7:613–622. doi: 10.2174/156800907782418301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lee DH, Kim MJ, Roh JL, Kim SB, Choi SH, et al. Distant metastases and survival prediction in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147:870–875. doi: 10.1177/0194599812447048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011;147:275–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reis PP, Waldron L, Perez-Ordonez B, Pintilie M, Galloni NN, et al. A gene signature in histologically normal surgical margins is predictive of oral carcinoma recurrence. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:437. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Saintigny P, Zhang L, Fan YH, El-Naggar AK, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts the development of oral cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:218–229. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Belbin TJ, Singh B, Barber I, Socci N, Wenig B, et al. Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using cDNA microarrays. Cancer Res. 2002;62:1184–1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chung CH, Parker JS, Ely K, Carter J, Yi Y, et al. Gene expression profiles identify epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and activation of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling as characteristics of a high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8210–8218. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Coló AE, Simoes AC, Carvalho AL, Melo CM, Fahham L, et al. Functional microarray analysis suggests repressed cell-cell signaling and cell survival-related modules inhibit progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Med Genomics. 2011;4:33. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chin D, Boyle GM, Williams RM, Ferguson K, Pandeya N, et al. Novel markers for poor prognosis in head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:789–797. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kulis M, Esteller M. DNA methylation and cancer. Adv Genet. 2010;70:27–56. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380866-0.60002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Heyn H, Esteller M. DNA methylation profiling in the clinic: applications and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:679–692. doi: 10.1038/nrg3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watanabe Y, Maekawa M. Methylation of DNA in cancer. Adv Clin Chem. 2010;52:145–167. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2423(10)52006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Glazer CA, Chang SS, Ha PK, Califano JA. Applying the molecular biology and epigenetics of head and neck cancer in everyday clinical practice. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:440–446. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Goel A, Boland CR. Epigenetics of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:1442–1460. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mikeska T, Bock C, Do H, Dobrovic A. DNA methylation biomarkers in cancer: progress towards clinical implementation. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012;12:473–487. doi: 10.1586/erm.12.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ren J, Singh BN, Huang Q, Li Z, Gao Y, et al. DNA hypermethylation as a chemotherapy target. Cell Signal. 2011;23:1082–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Demokan S, Dalay N. Role of DNA methylation in head and neck cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2011;2:123–150. doi: 10.1007/s13148-011-0045-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.González-Ramírez I, García-Cuellar C, Sánchez-Pérez Y, Granados-García M. DNA methylation in oral squamous cell carcinoma: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Oral Dis. 2011;17:771–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01833.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mascolo M, Siano M, Ilardi G, Russo D, Merolla F, et al. Epigenetic disregulation in oral cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:2331–2353. doi: 10.3390/ijms13022331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stephen JK, Chen KM, Havard S, Harris G, Worsham MJ. Promoter methylation in head and neck tumorigenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;863:187–206. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-612-8_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Righini CA, de Fraipont F, Timsit JF, Faure C, Brambilla E, et al. Tumor-specific methylation in saliva: a promising biomarker for early detection of head and neck cancer recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1179–1185. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hasegawa M, Nelson HH, Peters E, Ringstrom E, Posner M, et al. Patterns of gene promoter methylation in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Oncogene. 2002;21:4231–4236. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rosas SL, Koch W, da Costa Carvalho MG, Wu L, Califano J, et al. Promoter hypermethylation patterns of p16, O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase, and death-associated protein kinase in tumors and saliva of head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001;61:939–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sanchez-Cespedes M, Esteller M, Wu L, Nawroz-Danish H, Yoo GH, et al. Gene promoter hypermethylation in tumors and serum of head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2000;60:892–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Steinmann K, Sandner A, Schagdarsurengin U, Dammann RH. Frequent promoter hypermethylation of tumor-related genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2009;22:1519–1526. doi: 10.3892/or_00000596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chaisaingmongkol J, Popanda O, Warta R, Dyckhoff G, Herpel E, et al. Epigenetic screen of human DNA repair genes identifies aberrant promoter methylation of NEIL1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2012;31:5108–5116. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Guerrero-Preston R, Soudry E, Acero J, Orera M, Moreno-López L, et al. NID2 and HOXA9 promoter hypermethylation as biomarkers for prevention and early detection in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma tissues and saliva. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:1061–1072. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jithesh PV, Risk JM, Schache AG, Dhanda J, Lane B, et al. The epigenetic landscape of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:370–379. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Poage GM, Christensen BC, Houseman EA, McClean MD, Wiencke JK, et al. Genetic and epigenetic somatic alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are globally coordinated but not locally targeted. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hennessey PT, Ochs MF, Mydlarz WW, Hsueh W, Cope L, et al. Promoter methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines is significantly different than methylation in primary tumors and xenografts. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fernandez AF, Assenov Y, Martin-Subero JI, Balint B, Siebert R, et al. A DNA methylation fingerprint of 1628 human samples. Genome Res. 2012;22:407–419. doi: 10.1101/gr.119867.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Poage GM, Houseman EA, Christensen BC, Butler RA, Avissar-Whiting M, et al. Global hypomethylation identifies Loci targeted for hypermethylation in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3579–3589. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Marsit CJ, Christensen BC, Houseman EA, Karagas MR, Wrensch MR, et al. Epigenetic profiling reveals etiologically distinct patterns of DNA methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:416–422. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Langevin SM, Koestler DC, Christensen BC, Butler RA, Wiencke JK, et al. Peripheral blood DNA methylation profiles are indicative of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an epigenome-wide association study. Epigenetics. 2012;7:291–299. doi: 10.4161/epi.7.3.19134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Viet CT, Schmidt BL. Methylation array analysis of preoperative and postoperative saliva DNA in oral cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3603–3611. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Stransky N, Egloff AM, Tward AD, Kostic AD, Cibulskis K, et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333:1157–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.1208130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Agrawal N, Frederick MJ, Pickering CR, Bettegowda C, Chang K, et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333:1154–1157. doi: 10.1126/science.1206923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen Z, Jin Y, Yu D, Wang A, Mahjabeen I, et al. Down-regulation of the microRNA-99 family members in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nohata N, Hanazawa T, Kinoshita T, Okamoto Y, Seki N. MicroRNAs function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes: aberrant expression of microRNAs in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013;40:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tran N, O’Brien CJ, Clark J, Rose B. Potential role of micro-RNAs in head and neck tumorigenesis. Head Neck. 2010;32:1099–1111. doi: 10.1002/hed.21356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wu BH, Xiong XP, Jia J, Zhang WF. MicroRNAs: new actors in the oral cancer scene. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:314–319. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhou R, Hu G, Liu J, Gong AY, Drescher KM, et al. NF-kappaB p65-dependent transactivation of miRNA genes following Cryptosporidium parvum infection stimulates epithelial cell immune responses. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000681. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Shin VY, Jin H, Ng EK, Cheng AS, Chong WW, et al. NF-κB targets miR-16 and miR-21 in gastric cancer: involvement of prostaglandin E receptors. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:240–245. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Iliopoulos D, Jaeger SA, Hirsch HA, Bulyk ML, Struhl K. STAT3 activation of miR-21 and miR-181b-1 via PTEN and CYLD are part of the epigenetic switch linking inflammation to cancer. Mol Cell. 2010;39:493–506. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bourguignon LY, Earle C, Wong G, Spevak CC, Krueger K. Stem cell marker (Nanog) and Stat-3 signaling promote MicroRNA-21 expression and chemoresistance in hyaluronan/CD44-activated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2012;31:149–160. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Harris T, Jimenez L, Kawachi N, Fan JB, Chen J, et al. Low-level expression of miR-375 correlates with poor outcome and metastasis while altering the invasive properties of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:917–928. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kinoshita T, Hanazawa T, Nohata N, Okamoto Y, Seki N. The functional significance of microRNA-375 in human squamous cell carcinoma: aberrant expression and effects on cancer pathways. J Hum Genet. 2012;57:556–563. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2012.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kinoshita T, Nohata N, Yoshino H, Hanazawa T, Kikkawa N, et al. Tumor suppressive microRNA-375 regulates lactate dehydrogenase B in maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2012;40:185–193. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Nohata N, Hanazawa T, Kikkawa N, Mutallip M, Sakurai D, et al. Tumor suppressive microRNA-375 regulates oncogene AEG-1/MTDH in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) J Hum Genet. 2011;56:595–601. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2011.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kong KL, Kwong DL, Chan TH, Law SY, Chen L, et al. MicroRNA-375 inhibits tumour growth and metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma through repressing insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Gut. 2012;61:33–42. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Xue M, Cao X, Zhong Y, Kuang D, Liu X, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy: advances and perspectives. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:2901–2913. doi: 10.2174/138161212800672723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Park SY, Lee JH, Ha M, Nam JW, Kim VN. miR-29 miRNAs activate p53 by targeting p85 alpha and CDC42. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:23–29. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ugalde AP, Ramsay AJ, de la Rosa J, Varela I, Mariño G, et al. Aging and chronic DNA damage response activate a regulatory pathway involving miR-29 and p53. EMBO J. 2011;30:2219–2232. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sengupta S, den Boon JA, Chen IH, Newton MA, Stanhope SA, et al. MicroRNA 29c is down-regulated in nasopharyngeal carcinomas, upregulating mRNAs encoding extracellular matrix proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:5874–5878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801130105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zeng X, Xiang J, Wu M, Xiong W, Tang H, et al. Circulating miR-17, miR-20a, miR-29c, and miR-223 combined as non-invasive biomarkers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Yu T, Wang XY, Gong RG, Li A, Yang S, et al. The expression profile of microRNAs in a model of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthrance-induced oral carcinogenesis in Syrian hamster. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:64. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Russ AC, Sander S, Luck SC, Lang KM, Bauer M, et al. Integrative nucleophosmin mutation-associated microRNA and gene expression pattern analysis identifies novel microRNA - target gene interactions in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2011;96:1783–1791. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.046888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Liu CJ, Tsai MM, Hung PS, Kao SY, Liu TY, et al. miR-31 ablates expression of the HIF regulatory factor FIH to activate the HIF pathway in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1635–1644. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kikkawa N, Hanazawa T, Fujimura L, Nohata N, Suzuki H, et al. miR-489 is a tumour-suppressive miRNA target PTPN11 in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC) Br J Cancer. 2010;103:877–884. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li G, Luna C, Qiu J, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Role of miR-204 in the regulation of apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress response, and inflammation in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2999–3007. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hui AB, Lenarduzzi M, Krushel T, Waldron L, Pintilie M, et al. Comprehensive MicroRNA profiling for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1129–1139. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kiriakidou M, Nelson PT, Kouranov A, Fitziev P, Bouyioukos C, et al. A combined computational-experimental approach predicts human microRNA targets. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1165–1178. doi: 10.1101/gad.1184704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Pierobon M, Belluco C, Liotta LA, Petricoin EF., 3rd Reverse phase protein microarrays for clinical applications. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;785:3–12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-286-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Anderson L, Seilhamer J. A comparison of selected mRNA and protein abundances in human liver. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:533–537. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150180333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Frederick MJ, VanMeter AJ, Gadhikar MA, Henderson YC, Yao H, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling pathways in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient samples. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:548–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.10.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wheeler S, Siwak DR, Chai R, LaValle C, Seethala RR, et al. Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFR PY1068 are independent prognostic indicators for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2278–2289. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sahu N, Grandis JR. New advances in molecular approaches to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2011;22:656–664. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32834249ba. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Navlakha S, Bar-Joseph Z. Algorithms in nature: the convergence of systems biology and computational thinking. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:546. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ghosh S, Matsuoka Y, Asai Y, Hsin KY, Kitano H. Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:821–832. doi: 10.1038/nrg3096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cloutier M, Wang E. Dynamic modeling and analysis of cancer cellular network motifs. Integr Biol (Camb) 2011;3:724–732. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00145g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ondrey FG, Dong G, Sunwoo J, Chen Z, Wolf JS, et al. Constitutive activation of transcription factors NF-(kappa)B, AP-1, and NF-IL6 in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines that express proinflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokines. Mol Carcinog. 1999;26:119–129. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199910)26:2<119::aid-mc6>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lu H, Yang X, Duggal P, Allen CT, Yan B, et al. TNF-α promotes c-REL/ΔNp63α interaction and TAp73 dissociation from key genes that mediate growth arrest and apoptosis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6867–6877. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Yan B, Li H, Chen Z, Shao J, Zhan M. Integrative modeling of transcriptional regulatory networks in head and neck cancer. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Bioinformatics & Computational Biology; 2012. pp. 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Papagiannakopoulos T, Shapiro A, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 targets a network of key tumor-suppressive pathways in glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8164–8172. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Boldin MP, Baltimore D. MicroRNAs, new effectors and regulators of NF-κB. Immunol Rev. 2012;246:205–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hermeking H. The miR-34 family in cancer and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2009 doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wong MY, Yu Y, Walsh WR, Yang JL. microRNA-34 family and treatment of cancers with mutant or wild-type p53 (Review) Int J Oncol. 2011;38:1189–1195. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Cromer A, Carles A, Millon R, Ganguli G, Chalmel F, et al. Identification of genes associated with tumorigenesis and metastatic potential of hypopharyngeal cancer by microarray analysis. Oncogene. 2004;23:2484–2498. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.O’Donnell RK, Kupferman M, Wei SJ, Singhal S, Weber R, et al. Gene expression signature predicts lymphatic metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oncogene. 2005;24:1244–1251. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA, Jr, et al. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013;339:1546–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.1235122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2408–2417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES