Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2014 Mar;9(1):129–133.

Still and Moving Image Evidences for Mating of Echinococcus granulosus Reared in Culture Media

Tahereh MOHAMMADZADEH 1, Seyed Mahmoud SADJJADI 1,*, Hamidreza RAHIMI 1
PMCID: PMC4289871  PMID: 25642270

Abstract

Background

Echinococcus granulosus cultivation is very important for improvement of different aspect of medical and veterinary researches. Despite many advances in this case, there is a missing link for in vitro life cycle of adult worms and it is fertilization. Regarding the researchers’ observations, self-fertilization can be done in worms living in dog intestine, but despite all sorts of experimental techniques, this phenomenon has never been observed in reared worms in culture media. Furthermore, cross fertilization has not been observed in vitro and even in parasites with dog intestinal origin; although it theoretically is possible. During a follow-up of cultivated adult worms, evidences of behaviors similar to self-mating (Type 2) and cross-mating were observed in our lab which will be presented here.

Methods

Protoscoleces were aseptically removed from sheep hydatid cysts, washed twice with PBS and then cultivated in S.10E.H culture medium. The stages of parasite growth were observed using an inverted microscope for two months and all stages and behaviors were microscopically photographed. Different movies have also been made from these behavioral features.

Results

After around 55 days post cultivation, some evidences of behaviors similar to self-mating (Type 2) and cross-mating were observed in some of the mature adult worms. However, fertile eggs in these parasites have never been observed.

Conclusion

Regarding the above observations, these parasites show tendency to unsuccessful self-mating/fertilization (type 2) which failure could be due to anatomical position and physiological maturation. Also lack of suitable conditions for self-fertilization causes the worms try to do unsuccessful cross- mating/fertilization in culture media

Keywords: Echinococcus granulosus, Self-mating/fertilization, Cross-mating/fertilization, Culture media

Introduction

Echinococcus granulosus causative agent of cystic echinococcosis is an important zoonotic worm with global distribution, hygiene and economic importance. The relative disease is prevalent in Middle East and many part of our country, Iran (1-4).

Cultivation of this parasite is very valuable for improvement of different branches of medico-veterinary researches. Although many advances have been done with cultivation methods, fertilization is a missing link for in vitro life cycle of E. granulosus (5-7). Regarding previous observations, self-fertilization is considered to be a normal way for sperm transfer in natural intestinal worms but despite several experimental techniques, it has never been seen in cultivated worms (6, 8). In addition, cross-fertilization has never seen even in intestinal parasite, although theoretically it is possible (8, 9) and rarely has been suggested by molecular studies (10, 11). During daily follow up of cultivated worms (12), we succeeded to detect some evidences of behavior similar to self-mating (type 2) and cross-mating which can be very important to further understanding of the biology and speciation of the parasite and subsequent researches. Here we will discuss our observations.

Materials and Methods

Hydatid cysts with more than 80% fertile protoscoleces (PSC) were collected from infected sheep at Shiraz abattoirs, cut opened under aseptic conditions, passed through two layers sterile gauze, washed three times with sterile PBS and then cultured in S10E.H culture media using the same procedures described before with some modifications (6, 12, 13). All stages of parasite growth were observed during a long term assay (about two months) from the first day of growth to adult forms, using an inverted microscope. Photos as well as movies were made during this follow up.

Results

After around 55 days post cultivation, 50-60% of initially PSCs were developed to adult worms with at least 3 proglottids in culture flasks. In addition, most of them had at least a mature segment. Active proglottids with protruded cirrus have frequently observed in mature adult worms. Genital pore also was opened and closed rhythmically special in latest segment of some of them. During daily control of the culture flasks we succeeded to detect some behavior similar to mating in reared E. granulosus. In a survey second segment of an individual worm connected to third one of another worm (Fig 1: A & B; Movie: 1). It was considered that the connection has occurred between cirrus of a worm and genital pore of another one. Furthermore, in another observation an individual worm has attempted to close its third segment to the first segment of the same worm (Fig 1: C & D; Movie.2). Although these observations did not cause that we find mature eggs in culture flasks but these evidences may confirm positive potential of the E.granulosus to cross-mating/fertilization.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A and B- Connection between two different worms; C and D- Connection between first and third segment of an individual worm

Discussion

Initial efforts were carried out since 1926 and 1928 by Dévé to grow PSCs in cyst fluid (14, 15). Smyth succeeded to introduce in vitro cultivation of different larval stages of this parasite (16). He also cultivated sexually mature strobilate of this parasite from PSC (5). Despite within several years many advances have been done with cultivation method but fertilization is missing link for in vitro life cycle of E. granulosus (5-7; 12-19; 21). E. granulosus is a hermaphroditic parasite. Presence of male and female reproductive systems and common genital pore shows the parasite has potential for both cross and self-fertilization (9). Probably self-fertilization is an advantage for this small worm that it might be difficult to find another worm particularly in light infections (22). This phenomenon has been observed in E. granulosus collected from naturally and experimentally infected definitive host (8, 9). In sections derived of dog worms, the cirrus was inserted into the vagina and morphologically has been proved seminal receptacle of intestinal worms filled with spermatozoa (8). (Self-fertilization has also confirmed by some molecular studies in dog worms(10, 11, 23). Although cross-fertilization has not been observed in sections obtained of dog intestine (8) some researchers have suggested that aggregative behavior observed in intestinal worms are probably as a result of attraction between individual worms (24). Limited molecular reports have suggested probability of this phenomenon (10, 11) while others have rejected it (23). The major difference between sexually mature cultured and dog worms, was the failure of insemination to occur in the reared worms in culture media (25). In the well-developed genitalia of the mature reared adult worm many spermatozoa were seen in testes, but uterus filled with immature ova and empty seminal receptacle has always been observed (6).

In present study, we have frequently observed active proglottids with protruded cirrus. Genital pore was also opened and closed rhythmically special in latest segment, the situation that has also observed in previous investigations (6, 13).We also succeeded to detect some behavior similar to mating between the same and different worms although mature eggs did not find. Our finding may be confirming positive potential for cross-fertilization as it was confirm with detection early stages of the development of a shelled egg in the uterus cavity of a monozoic/ vesicular worm cultured in vitro (20).

According to the movie number 1(Movie 1), we speculate some cultivated parasites show tendency to “cross-mating” in culture which could be due to lack of suitable conditions for self-fertilization. Especially the large number of the parasite in culture media may be an advantage in which the small worms can find others. Another our finding is confirmed this theory that insemination between different proglottids of the same strobila is highly unlikely to occur (9). According to movie number 2(Movie 2), we believe the worms have tendency to unsuccessful mating between their individual proglottids. Kumaratilake et al, have believed the type (2) of self-fertilization is unsuccessful because no two proglottids of the same strobila are ever at the same stage of maturation (9). In addition to Kumaratilake’s opinion, we are believed that short stature and low number of the segment are important reasons of failure in connection and then mating/fertilization between two strobila segments of an individual worm.

Conclusion

We have observed some possible evidences of unsuccessful mating/fertilization in reared worms. Extremely complexity of requirements for fertilization may cause this physiologic function cannot dissolve production of fertile egg. Regarding the above observations, these parasites show tendency to unsuccessful self-mating/fertilization (type 2) which failure could be due to anatomical position and physiological maturation. Also lack of suitable conditions for self-fertilization causes the worms try to do unsuccessful cross-mating/fertilization in culture media. More study is necessary to improve our knowledge in this manner.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Bahador Sarkari (Shahriari-Rad), Mr Shahab Shams, Mrs. Sakineh Kazemian and Mr Amir Mutabi Alavi. The authors acknowledge Mrs Haiedeh Deisi and Mr Seyed Abbass Sadjadi for their help in editing the movies. This study is a part of Ph.D. thesis of T.M. at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences(SUMS) and has been supported by SUMS, Grant No. 4953. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Budke CM, Deplazes P, Torgerson PR. Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(2):296–303. doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sadjjadi SM. Present situation of echinococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa. Parasitol Int. 2006;55(Suppl):S197–S202. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2005.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rokni MB. Echinococcosis / hydatidosis in Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2009;4(2):1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fasihi Harandi M, Budke CM, Rostami S. The monetary burden of cystic echinococcosis in Iran. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11):e1915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smyth JD. Studies on tapeworm physiology. XI. In vitro cultivation of Echinococcus granulosus from the protoscolex to the strobilate stage. Parasitology. 1967;57(1):111–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smyth JD, Davies Z. In vitro culture of the strobilar stage of Echinococcus granulosus (sheep strain): A review of basic problems and results. Int J Parasitol. 1974;4:631–644. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(74)90028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smyth JD. Echinococcus granulosus and E. multilocularis: in vitro culture of the strobilar stages from protoscoleces. Angew Parasitol. 1979;20(3):137–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smyth JD, Smyth MM. Self-insemination in E. granulosus in vivo. J Helminthol. 1969;43:383–388. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x00004946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kumaratilake LM, Thompson RC, Eckert J, D’Alessandro A. Sperm transfer in Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae) Z Parasitenkd. 1986;72(2):265–269. doi: 10.1007/BF00931153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lymbery AJ, Thompson RC. Electrophoretic analysis of genetic variation in Echinococcus granulosus from domestic hosts in Australia. Int J Parasitol. 1988;18(6):803–811. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(88)90122-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haag KL, Araújo AM, Gottstein B, Siles-Lucas M, Thompson RC, Zaha A. Breeding systems in Echinococcus granulosus (Cestoda; Taeniidae): selfing or outcrossing? Parasitology. 1999;118(Pt 1):63–71. doi: 10.1017/s0031182098003485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mohammadzadeh T, Sadjjadi SM, Rahimi HR, Shams S. Establishment of a modified in vitro cultivation of protoscoleces to adult Echinococcus granulosus; an important way for new investigations on hydatidosis. Iran J Parasitol. 2012;7(1):55–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smyth JD. In vitro cultivation of parasitic helminths. CRC press. 1990:123–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dévé F. Evolution vesicular du scolex echinococcique obtenue in vitro. La culture artificielle de kyste hydatique. Comptes Rendus de la Société Biologique. 1926;94:440–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dévé F. Scoliciculture hydatique en sac de collodion et in vitro. Comptes Rendus de la Société Biologique. 1928;98:1176–1177. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Smyth JD. Studies on tapeworm physiology, X. Axenic cultivation of the hydatid organism. Echinococcus granulosus; establishment of a basic technique. Parasitology. 1962;52(3-4):441–457. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smyth JD, Howkins AB. An in vitro technique for the production of eggs of Echinococcus granulosus by maturation of partly developed strobila. Parasitology. 1966;56(4):763–766. doi: 10.1017/s003118200007178x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smyth JD, Barrett NJ. Procedures for testing the viability of human hydatid cysts following surgical removal, especially after chemotherapy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1980;74(5):649–652. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(80)90157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Macpherson CN, Smyth JD. In vitro culture of the strobilar stage of Echinococcus granulosus from protoscoleces of human, camel, cattle, sheep and goat origin from Kenya and buffalo origin from India. In J Parasitol. 1985;15(2):137–140. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(85)90078-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hijjawi NS, Abdel-Hafez SK, Kamhawi SA. Echinococcus granulosus: possible formation of a shelled egg in vitro. 1992;22(1):117–118. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(92)90088-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bölükbaş Cs, Doğanay A. Echinococcus granulosus’un in vitro Kültürü. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi. 2008;32(4):360–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thompson RCA. Biology and systematics of Echinococcus. In: Thompson RCA, Lymbery AJ, editors. Echinococcus and hydatid disease. Wallingford: CAB International; 1995. pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maillard S, Benchikh-Elfegoun MC, Kohil K, Gottstein B, Piarroux R. Failure to observe cross-fertilization between the Echinococcus granulosus G1 and G6 strains after an experimental mixed infection of the definitive host. Vet Parasitol. 2011;175(1-2):80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lymbery AJ, Hobbs RP, Thompson RC. The dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus in the intestine of dogs. J Parasitol. 1989;75(4):562–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Howell MJ, Smyth JD. Maintenance and cultivation of Echinicoccus species in vivo and in vitro. In: Thompson RCA, Lymbery AJ, editors. Echinococcus and hydatid disease. Wallingford: CAB International; 1995. pp. 201–232. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES