Abstract
Oriental theileriosis is an emerging, tick-borne disease of bovines in the Asia-Pacific region and is caused by one or more genotypes of the Theileria orientalis complex. This study aimed to establish and validate a multiplexed tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay using three distinct markers (major piroplasm surface protein, 23-kDa piroplasm membrane protein, and the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear DNA), for the simultaneous detection and semiquantification of four genotypes (Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5) of the T. orientalis complex. Analytical specificity, analytical sensitivity, and repeatability of the established MT-PCR assay were assessed in a series of experiments. Subsequently, the assay was evaluated using 200 genomic DNA samples collected from cattle from farms on which oriental theileriosis outbreaks had occurred, and 110 samples from a region where no outbreaks had been reported. The results showed the MT-PCR assay specifically and reproducibly detected the expected genotypes (i.e., genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5) of the T. orientalis complex, reliably differentiated them, and was able to detect as little as 1 fg of genomic DNA from each genotype. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the MT-PCR were estimated at 94.0% and 98.8%, respectively. The MT-PCR assay established here is a practical and effective diagnostic tool for the four main genotypes of T. orientalis complex in Australia and should assist studies of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of oriental theileriosis in the Asia-Pacific region.
INTRODUCTION
Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) pose a major threat to livestock production worldwide and can have a significant impact on farming communities due to economic losses (1). Theileriosis is one of the important TBDs of cattle, sheep, and/or other ruminants, mainly in tropical and subtropical regions of the world (2). In cattle, East Coast fever (ECF) and Mediterranean/tropical theileriosis are due to Theileria parva and Theileria annulata, respectively, whereas oriental theileriosis is caused by Theileria orientalis. The prevalence of various forms of theileriosis in different parts of the world is dependent on the occurrence of suitable tick vectors for their transmission (3).
Oriental theileriosis is caused by one or more genotypes of the T. orientalis complex and is transmitted by ixodid ticks, primarily Haemaphysalis spp. (4–6). Presently, 11 genotypes of T. orientalis complex (designated Chitose or type 1, Ikeda or type 2, Buffeli or type 3, types 4 to 8, and N-1 to N-3) have been identified using a number of molecular markers, including major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP) (7, 8), 23-kDa piroplasm membrane protein (p23) (9–11, 60), small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene (8, 12, 13), and/or the first and second internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS-1 and ITS-2, respectively) (12, 14). Of these genotypes, Ikeda and Chitose are recognized to be associated with clinical outbreaks of oriental theileriosis, mainly in the Asia-Pacific region (15–21). The major clinical signs of this disease include fever, anemia, jaundice, lethargy, weakness, abortion, and/or mortality (16–18), with significant production losses in dairy cattle (22). Thus far, four genotypes (Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5) of T. orientalis have been reported in Australia (13, 18, 20–23).
Currently, the diagnosis of oriental theileriosis is usually based on the observation of clinical signs, the detection of piroplasms of T. orientalis in blood smears (19, 24, 25), and/or the use of serological (26) or conventional molecular techniques (7, 27, 28). Each of these approaches has limitations. For example, clinical diagnosis is subjective and usually requires further laboratory investigations to confirm the presence of infection/disease. Microscopy is commonly used and involves the detection of T. orientalis piroplasms in blood smears. Although microscopy might be used to quantify the level of parasitemia (28), it is relatively time-consuming and inaccurate and does not provide any genetic information on the parasite. Serological tests can detect anti-T. orientalis antibodies early in an infection (29), but there are issues with immunological cross-reactivity among genotypes of T. orientalis (G. J. Eamens, personal communication), and it is not possible to unequivocally differentiate among exposure, current infection, and past infection by Theileria spp. (30). Conventional PCR techniques can be more sensitive than the aforementioned methods; however, their diagnostic performance can be affected by blood constituents (e.g., hemoglobin and lactoferrin) that are inhibitory to PCR, and they do not allow the quantitation of parasites (21, 31–33). Some of these issues can be overcome using real-time PCR assays, which allow the relative or absolute quantification of the parasites present in blood (34). Such assays have been developed for Theileria sergenti (35), T. parva (36, 37), and T. equi (38, 39) but have not yet been established for members of the T. orientalis complex.
A real-time PCR method that shows major promise is multiplexed tandem PCR (MT-PCR) (40). This technique can use multiple primer pairs for the detection of multiple pathogens. It consists of two amplifications: (i) multiplexed amplification (primary target enrichment), which involves a small number of PCR cycles and multiplexed or outer primer sets, and (ii) a subsequent quantification amplification which utilizes a diluted product from the primary amplification as a template and specific, nested, or inner primers (40). Although MT-PCR was originally developed to quantify gene transcription (40), MT-PCR has been applied to the sensitive and simultaneous detection of some fungi, such as Candida spp. (41, 42), enteric pathogens of humans (43, 44), gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep (45), and toxigenic cyanobacteria (46). As two genotypes of the T. orientalis complex (i.e., Chitose and Ikeda) are presently recognized to relate to clinical disease, there is a need to identify and differentiate each of them from nonpathogenic genotypes (i.e., Buffeli and type 5) of T. orientalis known to occur in southeast Australia (21). MT-PCR could offer a useful means of achieving such differential diagnosis as well as estimating the infection intensities of individual T. orientalis genotypes in bovines.
The aim of the present study was to establish and evaluate an MT-PCR assay for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of the four distinct genotypes, Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5, representing the T. orientalis complex known to occur in Australasia as well as for the semiquantitation of DNA of each of these genotypes in blood samples from cattle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Blood and genomic DNA samples.
Blood samples were available from 200 cattle (group 1; symptomatic or asymptomatic animals) from a previous study from 19 farms on which clinical outbreaks of oriental theileriosis were recorded (Table 1) (21). These blood samples had already been characterized using a conventional PCR-based approach (i.e., 170 test-positive samples, 20 samples showing PCR inhibition [using 2 μl of template], and 10 previously test-negative samples). In addition, blood samples were collected from 110 cattle (group 2) from the coccygeal vein (using an 18-gauge needle) into EDTA tubes by registered, practicing veterinarians (see Acknowledgments) from the Western District in Victoria, a region in which no outbreaks of oriental theileriosis and/or T. orientalis infections have been reported to date (Table 1). Genomic DNAs were extracted from individual blood samples (200 μl) using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (catalog no. 69506; Qiagen, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol, and eluted in 100 μl. In addition, genomic DNAs of other common blood parasites of cattle, including T. parva, T. annulata, Babesia bovis, and Anaplasma centrale, were available from colleagues (see Acknowledgments).
TABLE 1.
Demographic and characteristics of cattle farms selected for this study from various locations in Victoria
| Farm condition and no. | Location | Geographical coordinates | Farm enterprise |
Cattle breed(s) | Sample collection date (day/mo/yr) | No. of individuals tested | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beef | Dairy | Mixed | ||||||
| With oriental theileriosis outbreaks | ||||||||
| 1 | Bairnsdale | 37°82′ S, 147°62′ E | − | − | + | Mixed beef and dairy breeds | 3/14/2012 | 11 |
| 2 | Balmattum | 36°65′ S, 145°64′ E | + | − | − | Mixed beef breeds, including Brangus | 3/26/2012 | 8 |
| 3 | Bena farm 1 | 38° 41′ S, 145° 76′ E | − | + | − | Friesian | 3/14/2012 | 9 |
| 4 | Bena farm 2 | 38 41′ S, 145°76′ E | − | + | − | Friesian | 3/14/2012 | 18 |
| 5 | Bena farm 3 | 38° 41′ S, 145° 76′ E | − | + | − | Friesian | 3/4/2012 | 4 |
| 6 | Benallab | 36°55′ S, 145°98′E | Angus | 7/1/2012 | 3 | |||
| 7 | Bete Bolong | 37°69′ S, 148°39′ E | − | + | − | Friesian | 3/6/2012 | 21 |
| 8 | Bethanga | 36°12′ S, 147°09′ E | + | − | − | Angus | 3/8/2012 | 10 |
| 9 | Bunyip | 38°09′ S, 145°72′ E | + | − | − | Angus × Belgian blue | 3/20/2012 | 16 |
| 10 | Corryong | 36°19′ S, 147°91′ E | + | − | − | Angus | 4/3/2012 | 10 |
| 11 | East Gippsland | 37° 45′ S, 148° 18′E | + | − | − | Angus | 3/8/2012 | 9 |
| 12 | Freeburgh | 36°76′ S, 147°03′ E | + | − | − | Angus | 3/20/2012 | 3 |
| 13 | Girgarre | 36°40′ S, 144°98′E | − | + | − | Illawarra Shothorn | 3/28/2012 | 3 |
| 14 | Katandra | 36°24′ S, 145°63′ E | − | + | − | Holstein | 4/10/2012 | 12 |
| 15 | Orbost | 37° 71′ S, 148° 45′ E | − | − | + | Angus | 3/6/2012 | 9 |
| 16 | Pranjip | 36°76′ S, 145°39′ E | + | − | − | Hereford | 3/28/2012 | 20 |
| 17 | Staghorn | 36°24′ S, 146°93′ E | + | − | − | Hereford | 3/5/2012 | 7 |
| 18 | Tallangatta | 36°28′ S, 147°43′ E | + | − | − | Simmental | 5/3/2012 | 18 |
| 19 | Warragul | 38°16′ S, 145°93′ E | + | − | − | Angus | 6/3/2012 | 9 |
| With no history of oriental theileriosisa | ||||||||
| 20 | Curdievale | 38°51′ S, 142°88′E | − | + | − | Friesian and Holstein | 11/21/2013 | 21 |
| 21 | Jancourt East | 38°41′ S, 143°13′ E | − | + | − | Friesian and Holstein | 2/4/2014 | 27 |
| 22 | Princetown | 38° 64′ S, 143° 21′ E | − | + | − | Holstein | 2/4/2014 | 29 |
| 23 | Timboon West | 38°56′ S, 142°92′ E | − | + | − | Holstein and Jersey | 11/21/2013 | 33 |
Western District of Victoria.
Epidemiological data for this farm could not be collected.
MT-PCR.
The Easy-Plex platform (AusDiagnostics Pty., Ltd., Australia) was used, which includes a Rotor-Gene 6000 real-time PCR thermocycler (Qiagen, Germany) and a Gene-Plex CAS1212 liquid handling robot (AusDiagnostics). The primary amplification (target enrichment) was conducted using primer pairs designed to the sequences of the ITS-1 and the p23 gene of T. orientalis for genotypes Ikeda and Buffeli, respectively, and to the MPSP gene for both Chitose and type 5. Current information on the T. orientalis genome (Japanese Ikeda strain) indicates that it has two copies of ITS-1 and one copy each of the p23 and MPSP genes (47). The secondary amplification for semiquantification used nested primer pairs to internal regions of these loci (catalog no. 4023; AusDiagnostics); these internal primer pairs amplify a region of 107 bp from ITS-1 (genotype Ikeda), a region of 115 bp from the p23 gene, and regions of 70 to 112 bp from the MPSP gene (Chitose and type 5). In addition, an independent primer pair is included in each reaction mixture as a reference for quantitation and to assess the efficiency of amplification from 10,000 copies of a synthetic oligonucleotide template (internal spike control).
The final protocol was as follows: for primary amplification (15 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 20 s at 60°C, and 20 s at 72°C), 5 μl of genomic DNA representing each test sample or 5 μl of water (negative control) was dispensed into 0.2-ml PCR strips and placed into a 24-well thermocycling block within the Gene-Plex robotic platform. Following the dispensing of each sample and the initiation of the assay, the following setup process and analysis were executed by the program Easy-Plex Assay Setup (AusDiagnostics), with the secondary amplification in MT-PCR and the melting curve analysis being semiautomated (44, 48). A sample was recorded as test positive using the auto-call function of the Easy-Plex software (AusDiagnostics) if the amplicon produced a single melting curve which was within 1.5°C of the expected melting temperature, the height of the peak was higher than 0.2 dF/dT (where dF/dT is the derivative of fluorescence over temperature), and the peak width was ≤3.5°C. Cycle threshold (CT) values were recorded for each test-positive sample, and the DNA copy number for each genotype in each sample was determined by comparison with CT data determined for an internal spike control (40) for each sample tested. In instances (n = 9) where the internal spike control did not reach the expected DNA copy number of 10,000, the genomic DNA sample was diluted to 1:10 or 1:100 and retested, and the DNA copy number was calculated for the undiluted sample. Using this protocol, a minimum of 2.5 DNA copies (1 fg) could be detected. Finally, genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5 were assigned according to their mean (± standard deviation) expected peak melting temperatures of 83.6 ± 1.5°C, 82.1 ± 1.5°C, 87.4 ± 1.5°C, and 81.6 ± 1.5°C, respectively. The DNA copy number determined can be used as a measurement of the intensity of infection for each genotype. The relative intensities of infection by genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, and type 5 were estimated as the DNA copy number recorded for individual genotypes, while relative intensity of infection by genotype Ikeda was estimated by dividing the DNA copy number recorded by 2. In order to verify the specificity of MT-PCR as well as to assess nucleotide variation among amplicons in relation to peak melting temperature, selected samples (n = 100) were subjected to single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP) and sequenced (n = 10) using an established cloning-based protocol (49).
Statistical analyses.
To assess repeatability of the MT-PCR assay, the coefficient of variation (CV) was estimated using the program Microsoft Excel (2010). Owing to a positive skew, copy number data were log transformed and are presented as medians and geometric means (the back-transformed mean of the log-transformed copy number estimates) according to the following equation:
where n is the sample size, j is 1, …, n, and xj is the jth data value.
Pairwise comparisons of the relative intensity of each genotype in mixed genotypic infections were conducted (using Ikeda as the reference). For samples in which two genotypes were present (e.g., Buffeli and Ikeda), pairwise comparisons were conducted with paired-sample t tests of the geometric mean copy numbers, whereas for infections of more than two genotypes (e.g., Buffeli, Chitose, and Ikeda), linear mixed models were used to estimate the difference in geometric means using the program Stata (release 13; StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) by incorporating a random effect term to account for nonindependent observations (i.e., multiple genotypes in each individual). Models were of the following form: log10(gene copy number) = β0 + β1 · Chitose + β2 · Buffeli + β3 · type 5 + Individualj + ε, where β0 is an intercept which can be interpreted as the expected geometric mean copy number for the reference category (Ikeda), and β1, β2, and β3 are regression coefficients for categorical variables and may be interpreted as the difference in geometric mean copy number between genotype Ikeda and the genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, and type 5, respectively. We assumed that Individualj, which is the random effect term for the jth of N individual cows (where N is the total sample size of the study), was normally distributed, along with the residual error (ε), with a standard deviation of Sindividual according to the following: Individualj ∼ Normal(0, Sindividual), for j = 1, …, N.
The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the MT-PCR were estimated following the recommended Bayesian latent class modeling approach (50, 51) for two conditionally dependent tests on two populations (groups 1 and 2) in the absence of a gold standard (i.e., reference samples of known disease status). Conventional PCR cannot be considered a gold standard because it has been shown that the analytical sensitivity of the MT-PCR assay was 1,000 times higher than that of conventional PCR. Conventional PCR is a suitable diagnostic technique to detect T. orientalis. However, in MT-PCR, depending on the selected cutoff DNA copy number, a higher diagnostic sensitivity or higher diagnostic specificity than that of conventional PCR can be achieved. The Bayesian latent class modeling approach makes no assumptions about the status of animals from the two populations (groups 1 and 2). Prevalence was assumed to be distinct in each population, and diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were assumed to be constant across the two populations. The tests were assumed to be dependent (conditional on infection status) because they had the same biological basis, that is, the detection of nucleic acids of genotypes of T. orientalis. Prior information about the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the MT-PCR assay was modeled using independent and informative beta distributions elicited from a technical expert (R. B. Gasser) with knowledge of the populations and test performance yet not involved in the sample collection or testing (52). The most likely (modal) value and the (α − 100)th percentile of the corresponding beta distribution were elicited by asking the expert to specify that he was (100 − α)% sure that the diagnostic sensitivity of the MT-PCR was >X, and the most likely value for this parameter was Y (51). Prior information was similarly elicited for the prevalence in each population, while diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the conventional PCR assay were specified as diffuse priors based on elicited modal values only, following Branscum et al. (51). Dependence parameters were specified as uninformed independent uniform distributions, and Bayesian inferences were based on the joint posterior distribution, numerically approximated using the program WinBUGS (53), running 110,000 model iterations, discarding the first 10,000 iterations as burn-in, and thinning by 10 to minimize auto-correlation. Agreement statistics (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa [PABAK]) (54) were directly calculated as model outputs. Final inferences were presented as the 50%, 2.5%, and 97.5% quantiles of the marginal posterior distributions for each of the parameters, corresponding to a posterior median point estimate and 95% probability interval (PI), respectively.
Analyses were repeated by applying different DNA copy number cutoff values for dichotomizing the MT-PCR results as test positive, which enabled estimations of the two-way receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) curve and optimal cutoff. Sensitivity analyses were performed as recommended previously (50, 52) to test for the influence of elicited priors on the final results, inputting vague (flat) priors, and comparing all model outputs.
RESULTS
Establishment of the MT-PCR assay.
In setting up the MT-PCR assay, a series of experiments was conducted to establish the optimum cycling protocol, the specificity and sensitivity of the MT-PCR, and the repeatability of results. The analytical specificities of individual primer sets (genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5 of the T. orientalis complex) were assessed using well-defined genomic DNA samples representing each of the four genotypes (positive controls; n = 4) (from Perera et al. [21]) as well as from T. annulata, T. parva, A. centrale, and B. bovis (negative controls; n = 4). Each of the four primer sets designed and tested amplified products exclusively from the expected genotypes (Fig. 1A and B). The identity of individual products was confirmed by SSCP analysis and sequencing, and no products were amplified from T. annulata, T. parva, A. centrale, or B. bovis DNA. Using the same, well-defined samples, repeatability of the copy number was greater within a run (CV of 12%) than among runs (CV of 26%), and genotypes were always correctly assigned (CV of 0%) for samples with ≥30 DNA copies.
FIG 1.
Detection of various genotypes of the Theileria orientalis complex using the MT-PCR assay. Cycling (A) and melting (B) curves for the genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5 of T. orientalis are shown. (C) Cycling curves of a blood DNA sample showing partial inhibition/delayed amplification of the spike control. (D and E) Cycling curves using undiluted template and showing no inhibition when the template was diluted at 1:10 (D) and 1:100 (E).
Validation of the MT-PCR assay.
Two hundred DNA samples representing cattle from 19 farms on which oriental theileriosis outbreaks had occurred (group 1) and 110 samples representing cattle farms where no outbreaks had occurred in Victoria (group 2) were tested in MT-PCR. Of the 200 samples from cattle in group 1, all genomic DNA samples that tested positive in a previous conventional PCR study (21) also tested positive (>0 DNA copies) by MT-PCR (n = 170). In addition, 17 of the samples that showed PCR inhibition (using 2 μl of template) in conventional PCR (n = 20) (21) did not inhibit MT-PCR. Of 10 samples that were previously negative by conventional PCR (21), eight samples tested positive by MT-PCR, with all eight positive samples containing 4 to 15 DNA copies. In addition, of 110 samples from group 2, 2 tested positive for T. orientalis by both MT-PCR and conventional PCR, and a further 6 samples tested positive by MT-PCR only. Of all 200 samples from group 1, 9 samples showed inhibition using 5 μl of template but did not when the original template was diluted to 1:10 or 1:100 and retested (Fig. 1C to E). SSCP analysis of 100 amplicons representing all four genotypes (Buffeli, n = 30; Chitose, n = 25; Ikeda, n = 30; type 5, n = 15) of T. orientalis revealed four main profiles (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material); minor SSCP profile variation was repeatedly observed within genotypes Buffeli and Chitose, which was reflected in differences in the peak melting temperatures (0.9 to 1.0°C). DNA sequencing of amplicons revealed that nucleotide variation of 1.4 to 1.7% was associated with these differences (data not shown).
Of 200 blood samples collected from group 1, 198 tested positive in MT-PCR (applying a cutoff >0 DNA copy number detected). In this group, the prevalences of individual genotypes (i.e., Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5) of the T. orientalis complex in cattle included in these outbreaks were 92.9% (184/198), 57.1% (113/198), 95.5% (189/198), and 32.3% (64/198), respectively. The prevalence of T. orientalis infections with single or mixed genotypes detected is shown in Fig. 2. The number of infections with mixed genotypes was higher (93.43%; 185/198) than those with single genotypes (6.57%; 13/198). There was a high prevalence (38.9%) of mixed infections with genotypes Buffeli and Ikeda, followed by infection with all four genotypes (31.3%) and with genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, and Ikeda (21.2%) (Fig. 2). Most of the oriental theileriosis outbreaks (31.6%; 6/19) had a high prevalence of genotype Ikeda, followed by infection with genotype Buffeli (Table 2). Ten of 19 farms had a prevalence of 100% for genotype Ikeda. Type 5 showed the lowest prevalence among the four genotypes (Table 2). Compared with other regions, a comparatively high average relative intensity of infection by genotype Ikeda was recorded in Bairnsdale, Balmattum, Benalla, Bena farm 1, Bethanga, Bunyip, Corryong, Katandra, and Tallangatta, where deaths and/or abortions were reported (Table 2).
FIG 2.
Prevalence of genotypes of the Theileria orientalis complex detected by the MT-PCR assay. Letters C, B, I, and T denote single infections by genotypes Chitose, Buffeli, Ikeda, and type 5, respectively. Various combinations of letters with the plus sign denote mixed infections with two or more genotypes.
TABLE 2.
Numbers of cows that died or aborted and average relative intensity of infection by genotypes of Theileria orientalis in each outbreak at each location (farm)
| Farm no. | Location (n)a | No. of cows that died due to theileriosis | No. of cows that aborted due to theileriosis | Prevalence of genotype (%) |
Avg intensity of infection by genotype (DNA copies) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ikeda | Chitose | Buffeli | Type 5 | Ikeda | Chitose | Buffeli | Type 5 | ||||
| 1 | Bairnsdale (11) | 1 | 0 | 100 | 36.4 | 100 | 9.1 | 165,636 | 14,797 | 110,165 | 9 |
| 2 | Balmattum (8) | 1 | 2 | 87.5 | 37.5 | 100 | 37.5 | 120,177 | 107,017 | 102,661 | 4,355 |
| 3 | Bena farm 1 (9) | 16 | 6 | 77.8 | 0 | 88.9 | 11.1 | 65,023 | 0 | 21,800 | 1,000 |
| 4 | Bena farm 2 (18) | 1 | 0 | 94.4 | 88.9 | 94.4 | 55.6 | 238,319 | 270,6797 | 106,535 | 16 |
| 5 | Bena farm 3 (4) | 0 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 38,514 | 0 | 15,145 | 0 |
| 6 | Benalla (3)b | 33.3 | 100 | 33.3 | 0 | 20,689 | 9 | 10,750 | 0 | ||
| 7 | Bete Bolong (21) | 7 | 0 | 100 | 90.5 | 100 | 42.9 | 59,959 | 22,843 | 137,234 | 33,42 |
| 8 | Bethanga (10) | 4 | 4 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 195,658 | 15 | 72,115 | 0 |
| 9 | Bunyip (16) | 5 | 0 | 100 | 6.3 | 100 | 12.5 | 150,092 | 6,033 | 106,745 | 1,602 |
| 10 | Corryong (10) | 4 | 0 | 100 | 20 | 90 | 10 | 50,331 | 6,305 | 16,673 | 9 |
| 11 | East Gippsland (9) | 22 | 12 | 88.9 | 88.9 | 88.9 | 55.6 | 166,249 | 221,099 | 505,150 | 2,163 |
| 12 | Freeburgh (3) | 0 | 1 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Girgarre (3) | 0 | 3 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 0 | 84,918 | 108,368 | 302,627 | 0 |
| 14 | Katandra (12) | 6 | 0 | 100 | 58.3 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 110,907 | 97,482 | 47,436 | 20 |
| 15 | Orbost (9) | 1 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 24,857 | 156,553 | 338,766 | 44,072 |
| 16 | Pranjip (20) | 0 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 111,315 | 186,715 | 115,938 | 8,403 |
| 17 | Staghorn (7) | 2 | 1 | 100 | 14.3 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 3,268 | 108,368 | 40,302 | 16,847 |
| 18 | Tallangatta (18) | 1 | 1 | 94.4 | 50 | 94.4 | 5.6 | 191,611 | 147,184 | 120,811 | 201 |
| 19 | Warragul (9) | 0 | 0 | 88.9 | 77.8 | 88.9 | 0 | 24,587 | 770 | 27,561 | 0 |
n, number of cows.
Epidemiological data for this farm could not be collected.
Although all four genotypes were detected in cattle experiencing clinical oriental theileriosis, the relative intensity of infection by each of these genotypes showed that genotypes Ikeda and Buffeli dominated the other two genotypes (Chitose and type 5) (Table 3). For the most prevalent, mixed infections (i.e., with genotypes Buffeli and Ikeda), the genotype Ikeda showed a significantly higher relative intensity of infection than the genotype Buffeli (P < 0.001) (Table 3; Fig. 3). Genotype Ikeda was significantly more dominant (P < 0.001) than genotype Chitose in mixed infections with genotypes Buffeli, Chitose, and Ikeda. Of 110 DNA samples from group 2, eight samples tested positive in MT-PCR; four had single infections with genotype Buffeli (copy number range, 11 to 26), and four had mixed infections with genotypes Buffeli (copy number range, 5 to 30,019) and Ikeda (copy number range, 3 to 90,547).
TABLE 3.
Relative intensity of infection (DNA copies) by genotypes of Theileria orientalis in regions where outbreaks occurred
| Type of mixed infection (n)a | Genotype | Category | Median DNA copy no. (min, max)b | Geometric mean DNA copy no. | Difference of geometric mean DNA copy no. (95% CI)c | P valued |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ikeda + Chitose (3) | Ikeda | 0 | 8 (8, 2,500) | |||
| Chitose | 1 | 19 (8, 9,000) | ||||
| Ikeda + Buffeli (77) | Ikeda | 0 | 22,061 (3, 706,132) | 11,599 | −6,744 (−8,063, −4,933) | <0.001 |
| Buffeli | 1 | 10,000 (4, 792,570) | 4,855 | |||
| Ikeda + Chitose + Buffeli (42) | Ikeda | 0 | 28,577 (6, 621,062) | 16,604 | 0 | |
| Chitose | 1 | 207 (10, 266,168) | 460 | −16,144 (−16,450, −15,233) | <0.001 | |
| Buffeli | 2 | 24,812 (11, 1,324,465) | 21,510 | 4,906 (−9,389, 47,519) | 0.642 | |
| Ikeda + Buffeli + type 5 (1) | Ikeda | 0 | 8,424 | |||
| Buffeli | 1 | 21,778 | ||||
| Type 5 | 2 | 3,175 | ||||
| Ikeda + Chitose + Buffeli + type 5 (62) | Ikeda | 0 | 40,958 (6, 7,06,132) | 38,004 | 0 | |
| Chitose | 1 | 76,866 (8, 1,412,263) | 38,815 | 811 (−19,553, 43,651) | 0.97 | |
| Buffeli | 2 | 89,387 (9, 1,412,263) | 67,702 | 29,698 (−5,821, 104,419) | 0.13 | |
| Type 5 | 3 | 35 (5, 249,621) | 217 | −37,787 (−37,900, −37,548) | <0.001 |
n, number of animals.
min, minimum; max, maximum.
CI, confidence interval.
P values were obtained by comparing each category with the reference group (i.e., category 0). For three mixed infections, data were analyzed by pair-wise comparisons using genotype Ikeda as the reference category. Statistical analysis for two mixed infections was not performed as the sample size was low. Results were estimated using linear mixed models, adjusting for variability among samples. Significant values are in boldface.
FIG 3.
Box plot diagrams showing the number of DNA copies of genotypes in mixed infections as indicated on each panel. The DNA copy number recorded for genotype Ikeda was divided by 2 to determine the DNA copy numbers shown in the figure.
The diagnostic specificity of the MT-PCR (94.0%; 95% PI, 90.1 to 96.8%) was lower than that of the conventional PCR (96.8%; 95% PI, 93.0 to 98.8%); the diagnostic sensitivity of the MT-PCR was 98.8% (95% PI, 96.7 to 99.7%) if test positivity was defined based on a cutoff of >0 DNA copies, compared with 95.1% (95% PI, 91.6 to 97.5%) for the conventional PCR. When the MT-PCR was interpreted using the test-positive cutoff of >20 DNA copies (Fig. 4), diagnostic performance was equivalent to that of the conventional PCR (see Fig. S2 and Table S1 in the supplemental material). There was excellent agreement between the two diagnostic tests in both groups of samples (posterior median PABAK of >0.864 in all iterations), and the prevalence estimates in the two populations were relatively stable (group 1, >95.1%; group 2, 1.3%) even as the MT-PCR cutoff was altered. Changes in inference were negligible when the Bayesian latent class model was populated with flat (uninformative) priors.
FIG 4.

Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the MT-PCR at different cutoff points.
DISCUSSION
The present study established and validated an MT-PCR assay for the detection, differentiation, and semiquantitation of four genotypes (i.e., Buffeli, Chitose, Ikeda, and type 5) of the T. orientalis complex in Australia in blood samples from cattle. Bayesian latent class analysis estimated that 95% of 200 cattle specifically selected from infected farms and only 1.3% of 110 cattle from farms from an area in Victoria (Western District) where theileriosis cases have not been reported tested positive for one or more of the four genotypes. Moreover, the levels of parasite DNA in blood were substantially higher (30 times) in most cattle in the region of endemicity (group 1) than in the eight cattle from the Western District of Victoria (group 2) that tested positive in the MT-PCR (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). It is possible that these test-positive cattle were recently introduced into this district as cattle transport from regions of endemicity to regions where the parasite is not endemic within Victoria as well as from New South Wales is common (Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales Government [www.dpi.nsw.gov.au]). Conventional PCR (21) detected DNA of T. orientalis in only two of the eight cattle with the highest intensity of infection inferred from the MT-PCR.
Electrophoretic mutation scanning analysis and targeted sequencing demonstrated specificity for all four sets of primers, all of the amplicons produced, and the conditions of MT-PCR. In addition, the DNA samples from four heterologous blood pathogens (T. annulata, T. parva, A. centrale, and B. bovis) tested were, as expected, all negative. Nonetheless, future studies should reevaluate the specificity of the MT-PCR assay in regions where other blood-borne bovine pathogens are endemic (including viruses and bacteria). Although intended for genotypic detection/differentiation and semiquantitation, the present MT-PCR assay might also be useful as a mutation scanning tool to detect genetic variability within individual genotypes of T. orientalis because SSCP-coupled sequencing was able to show that subtle variation (∼0.9°C) in peak melting temperature linked to sequence difference of 1.4 to 1.7% (one or two nucleotide alterations) in loci for the Buffeli and Chitose types was readily detectable.
The minimum amount of DNA detectable (i.e., 1 fg or 2.5 DNA copies) by MT-PCR was comparable to that of previous studies using the same platform (44, 46), and the test was approximately 1,000 times more sensitive than conventional PCR (21). Given the ability of the MT-PCR to detect ≥1 fg of T. orientalis DNA, the present study has shown that most infections are multigenotypic, in contrast to previous results achieved by conventional (one-step) PCRs. The performance of MT-PCR is comparable to or better than that reported for some real-time TaqMan PCRs established for T. equi and T. sergenti (35–39). In our MT-PCR, the DNA copy number estimate for each genotype and sample relative to the internal spike control (i.e., 10,000 DNA copies of a synthetic oligonucleotide template amplified by specific primers) is likely to be more accurate and repeatable than for other assays used previously. The DNA copy number determined can be used as a measurement of the intensity of infection for each genotype. Given that high DNA copy numbers of pathogenic genotypes (Chitose and Ikeda) of T. orientalis in cattle might relate to disease (our unpublished data), the ability to estimate intensity could be useful to predict the risk of an outbreak, but this proposal warrants testing.
Coinfections with multiple T. orientalis genotypes were commonly detected by MT-PCR, consistent with previous studies in Australia (13, 20, 21, 23). However, here, Ikeda was the most common genotype, followed by the Buffeli, Chitose, and type 5 genotypes, in contrast to previous evidence showing that Chitose was the second most prevalent genotype (21–23). This difference in prevalence is likely due to the ability of the present MT-PCR to detect tiny amounts (≥1 fg) of parasite DNA compared with conventional PCRs (21–23). The sensitivity of the MT-PCR assay also explains why the prevalence of the Buffeli type was higher than recorded in previous studies (20, 21) and also provides additional support for the proposal that the Buffeli genotype is endemic in Australia (55, 56); however, a large-scale nation-wide survey would be needed to establish the geographical distribution of different genotypes of the T. orientalis complex. Currently, the MT-PCR assay has been designed for the four genotypes of T. orientalis known to occur in Australia (20, 21, 23). The assay could be readily modified to include loci or gene regions for genotypes not included in the present assay, provided that the markers to be used have been prevalidated for specificity to detect additional genotypes prior to their inclusion in the assay.
In conclusion, the semiautomated MT-PCR assay established here is a cost-effective, time-efficient, and practical diagnostic tool. It provides a major advance because it allows a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of four distinct genotypes of T. orientalis at once. Currently, the estimated cost per sample is Aus$19, which is approximately half that of our conventional PCR-based testing (21, 23), and the time required from sample preparation to test result is about one-fifth (about 1 day) of that using the conventional approach. In our opinion, the MT-PCR assay has broad applicability and can now be utilized to support investigations into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and transmission of oriental theileriosis. For example, the assay could be readily used to explore the temporal changes in genotypes that occur within individual cattle (proposed by Perera et al. [22]), population dynamics suggested to occur during transmission from cattle to ticks and vice versa (57), and/or to test the hypothesis that definitive and intermediate hosts other than cattle and Haemaphysalis, respectively, are involved in disease spread (58, 59). For instance, it would be interesting to explore whether water buffaloes or deer might act as reservoir hosts. Importantly, the present MT-PCR assay will be useful for the surveillance and monitoring of oriental theileriosis in Australasia and should be readily applicable in other countries in the Asia-Pacific region where this disease significantly impacts livestock health, welfare, and production.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was partially supported by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Dairy Australia, a Collaborative Research grant (the University of Melbourne) (A.J.), and the Australian Research Council (R.B.G.). P.K.P. is a grateful recipient of the International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and Australian Postgraduate Award through The University of Melbourne. We thank Aaron R. Jex for granting us permission to use the Easy-Plex platform (AusDiagnostics Pty. Ltd., Australia), which was bought under project 1043, funded by Water Quality Research Australia and contributions from the Melbourne Water Corporation.
We gratefully acknowledge DNA/blood samples donated by Graeme J. Eamens from the Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Australia, by Philip Carter from the Tick Fever Centre, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, Australia, by Nicola E. Collins from University of Pretoria, South Africa, and by Naoaki Yokoyama from Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido, Japan. We also thank Peter Younis and his colleagues from The Vet Group, Timboon, Australia, for the collection of blood samples from cattle from Western District of Victoria.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02536-14.
REFERENCES
- 1.Minjauw B, McLeod A. 2003. Tick-borne diseases and poverty: the impact of ticks and tick-borne diseases on the livelihoods of small-scale and marginal livestock owners in India and eastern and southern Africa. Department for International Development, Animal Health Programme, Centre of Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom: http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/RLAHTickBorn_Book.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Uilenberg G. 1995. International collaborative research: significance of tick-borne hemoparasitic diseases to world animal health. Vet Parasitol 57:19–41. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)03107-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dobbelaere DAE, Mckeever DJ. 2002. Theileria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Uilenberg G, Mpangala C, McGregor W, Callow LL. 1977. Biological differences between African Theileria mutans (Theiler 1906) and two benign species of Theileria of cattle in Australia and Britain. Aust Vet J 53:271–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1977.tb00214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Uilenberg G. 1981. Theilerial species of domestic livestock, p 4–37. In Irvin AD, Cunninham MP, Young AS (ed), Advances in the control of theileriosis. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jongejan F, Musisi FL, Moorhouse PD, Snacken M, Uilenberg G. 1986. Theileria taurotragi in Zambia. Vet Q 8:261–263. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1986.9694051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kakuda T, Shiki M, Kubota S, Sugimoto C, Brown WC, Kosum C, Nopporn S, Onuma M. 1998. Phylogeny of benign Theileria species from cattle in Thailand, China and the U.S.A. based on the major piroplasm surface protein and small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. Int J Parasitol 28:1261–1267. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00113-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gubbels MJ, Hong Y, van der Weide M, Qi B, Nijman IJ, Guangyuan L, Jongejan F. 2000. Molecular characterisation of the Theileria buffeli/orientalis group. Int J Parasitol 30:943–952. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sako Y, Asada M, Kubota S, Sugimoto C, Onuma M. 1999. Molecular cloning and characterisation of 23-kDa piroplasm surface proteins of Theileria sergenti and Theileria buffeli. Int J Parasitol 29:593–599. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yokoyama N, Ueno A, Mizuno D, Kuboki N, Khukhuu A, Igarashi I, Miyahara T, Shiraishi T, Kudo R, Oshiro M, Zakimi S, Sugimoto C, Matsumoto K, Inokuma H. 2011. Genotype diversity of Theileria orientalis detected from cattle grazing in Kumamoto and Okinawa prefectures of Japan. J Vet Med Sci 73:305–312. doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ota N, Mizuno D, Kuboki N, Igarashi I, Nakamura Y, Yamashina H, Hanzaike T, Fujii K, Onoe S, Hata H, Kondo S, Matsui S, Koga M, Matsumoto K, Inokuma H, Yokoyama N. 2009. Epidemiological survey of Theileria orientalis infection in grazing cattle in the eastern part of Hokkaido, Japan. J Vet Med Sci 71:937–944. doi: 10.1292/jvms.71.937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aktas M, Altay K, Dumanli N. 2006. A molecular survey of bovine Theileria parasites among apparently healthy cattle and with a note on the distribution of ticks in eastern Turkey. Vet Parasitol 138:179–185. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kamau J, de Vos AJ, Playford M, Salim B, Kinyanjui P, Sugimoto C. 2011. Emergence of new types of Theileria orientalis in Australian cattle and possible cause of theileriosis outbreaks. Parasit Vectors 4:22. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamau J, Salim B, Yokoyama N, Kinyanjui P, Sugimoto C. 2011. Rapid discrimination and quantification of Theileria orientalis types using ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers. Infect Genet Evol 11:407–414. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sugimoto C, Fujisaki K. 2002. Non-transforming Theileria parasites of ruminants, p 93–106. In Dobbelaere DAE, McKeever DJ (ed), Theileria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Izzo MM, Poe I, Horadagoda N, De Vos AJ, House JK. 2010. Haemolytic anaemia in cattle in NSW associated with Theileria infections. Aust Vet J 88:45–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2009.00540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aparna M, Ravindran R, Vimalkumar MB, Lakshmanan B, Rameshkumar P, Kumar KG, Promod K, Ajithkumar S, Ravishankar C, Devada K, Subramanian H, George AJ, Ghosh S. 2011. Molecular characterization of Theileria orientalis causing fatal infection in crossbred adult bovines of South India. Parasitol Int 60:524–529. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Islam MK, Jabbar A, Campbell BE, Cantacessi C, Gasser RB. 2011. Bovine theileriosis–an emerging problem in south-eastern Australia? Infect Genet. Evol 11:2095–2097. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McFadden AM, Rawdon TG, Meyer J, Makin J, Morley CM, Clough RR, Tham K, Mullner P, Geysen D. 2011. An outbreak of haemolytic anaemia associated with infection of Theileria orientalis in naive cattle. N Z Vet J 59:79–85. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.552857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eamens GJ, Bailey G, Jenkins C, Gonsalves JR. 2013. Significance of Theileria orientalis types in individual affected beef herds in New South Wales based on clinical, smear and PCR findings. Vet Parasitol 196:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Perera PK, Gasser RB, Anderson GA, Jeffers M, Bell CM, Jabbar A. 2013. Epidemiological survey following oriental theileriosis outbreaks in Victoria, Australia, on selcted cattle farms. Vet Parasitol 197:509–521. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Perera PK, Gasser RB, Firestome SM, Anderson GA, Malmo J, Davis G, Beggs DS, Jabbar A. 2014. Oriental theileriosis in dairy cows causes a significant milk production loss. Parasit Vectors 7:73. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cufos N, Jabbar A, de Carvalho LM, Gasser RB. 2012. Mutation scanning-based analysis of Theileria orientalis populations in cattle following an outbreak. Electrophoresis 33:2036–2040. doi: 10.1002/elps.201200082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Becerra VM, Eggen AAS, Rooy RC, Uilenberg G. 1983. Theileria orientalis in cattle in Ethiopia. Res Vet Sci 34:362–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Altay K, Aydin MF, Dumanli N, Aktas M. 2008. Molecular detection of Theileria and Babesia infections in cattle. Vet Parasitol 158:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jeong W, Kweon CH, Kim JM, Jang H, Paik SG. 2005. Serological investigation of Theileria sergenti using latex agglutination test in South Korea. J Parasitol 91:164–169. doi: 10.1645/GE-3294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kawazu S, Sugimoto C, Kamio T, Fujisaki K. 1992. Antigenic differences between Japanese Theileria sergenti and other benign Theileria species of cattle from Australia (T. buffeli) and Britain (T. orientalis). Parasitol Res 78:130–135. doi: 10.1007/BF00931654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tanaka M, Onoe S, Matsuba T, Katayama S, Yamanaka M, Yonemichi H, Hiramatsu K, Baek BK, Sugimoto C, Onuma M. 1993. Detection of Theileria sergenti infection in cattle by polymerase chain reaction amplification of parasite-specific DNA. J Clin Microbiol 31:2565–2569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kajiwara N, Kirisawa R, Onuma M, Kawakami Y. 1990. Specific DNA probe for the detection of Theileria sergenti infection in cattle. Jpn J Vet Sci 52:1199–1204. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.52.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bishop R, Sohanpal B, Kariuki DP, Young AS, Nene V, Baylis H, Allsopp BA, Spooner PR, Dolan TT, Morzaria SP. 1992. Detection of a carrier state in Theileria parva-infected cattle by the polymerase chain reaction. Parasitology 104:215–232. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000061655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Panaccio M, Lew A. 1991. PCR based diagnosis in the presence of 8% (v/v) blood. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1151. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.5.1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wilson IG. 1997. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3741–3751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hoorfar J, Malorny B, Abdulmawjood A, Cook N, Wagner M, Fach P. 2004. Practical considerations in design of internal amplification controls for diagnostic PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol 42:1863–1868. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1863-1868.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bell AS, Ranford-Cartwright LC. 2002. Real-time quantitative PCR in parasitology. Trends Parasitol 18:337–342. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02331-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jeong W, Kweon CH, Kang SW, Paik SG. 2003. Diagnosis and quantification of Theileria sergenti using TaqMan PCR. Vet Parasitol 111:287–295. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00388-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sibeko KP, Oosthuizen MC, Collins NE, Geysen D, Rambritch NE, Latif AA, Groeneveld HT, Potgieter FT, Coetzer JAW. 2008. Development and evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test for the detection of Theileria parva infections in Cape buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and cattle. Vet Parasitol 155:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Papli N, Landt O, Fleischer C, Koekemoer JO, Mans BJ, Pienaar R, Josemans A, Zweygarth E, Potgieter F, Latif AA. 2011. Evaluation of a TaqMan real-time PCR for the detection of Theileria parva in buffalo and cattle. Vet Parasitol 175:356–359. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim C, Blanco LBC, Alhassan A, Iseki H, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Igarashi I. 2008. Diagnostic real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Theileria equi from equine blood samples. Vet Parasitol 151:158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bhoora R, Quan M, Franssen L, Butler CM, Van der Kolk JH, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Jongejan F, Collins NE. 2010. Development and evaluation of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses from South Africa. Vet Parasitol 168:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stanley KK, Szewczuk E. 2005. Multiplexed tandem PCR: gene profiling from small amounts of RNA using SYBR Green detection. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e180. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lau A, Sorrell TC, Chen S, Stanley K, Iredell J, Halliday C. 2008. Multiplex tandem PCR: a novel platform for rapid detection and identification of fungal pathogens from blood culture specimens. J Clin Microbiol 46:3021–3027. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00689-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lau A, Halliday C, Chen SCA, Playford EG, Stanley K, Sorrell TC. 2010. Comparison of whole blood, serum, and plasma for early detection of candidemia by multiplex-tandem PCR. J Clin Microbiol 48:811–816. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01650-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stark D, Al-Qussab SE, Barratt JLN, Stanley K, Roberts T, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis JT. 2011. Evaluation of multiplex tandem real-time PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in clinical stool samples. J Clin Microbiol 49:257–262. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01796-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jex AR, Stanley KK, Lo W, Littman R, Verweij JV, Campbell BE, Nolan MJ, Pangasa A, Stevens MA, Haydon S, Gasser RB. 2012. Detection of diarrhoeal pathogens in human faeces using an automated, robotic platform. Mol Cell Probes 26:11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Roeber F, Jex AR, Campbell AJD, Nielsen R, Anderson GA, Stanley KK, Gasser RB. 2012. Establishment of a robotic, high-throughput platform for the specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep. Int J Parasitol 42:1151–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Baker L, Sendall BC, Gasser RB, Menjivar T, Neilan BA, Jex AR. 2013. Rapid, multiplex-tandem PCR assay for automated detection and differentiation of toxigenic cyanobacterial blooms. Mol Cell Probes 27:208–214. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hayashida K, Hara Y, Abe T, Yamasaki C, Toyoda A, Kosuge T, Suzuki Y, Sato Y, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Wakaguri H, Inoue N, Homma K, Tada-Umezaki M, Yagi Y, Fujii Y, Habara T, Kanehisa M, Watanabe H, Ito K, Gojonori T, Sugawara H, Imanishi T, Weir W, Gardner M, Pain A, Shiels B, Hattori M, Nene V, Sugimoto C. 2012. Comparative genome analysis of three eukaryotic parasites with differing abilities to transform leukocytes reveals key mediators of Theileria-induced leukocyte transformation. mBio 3(5):e00204–12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00204-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Szewczuk E, Thapa K, Anninos T, McPhie K, Higgins G, Dwyer DE, Stanley KK, Iredell JR. 2010. Rapid semi-automated quantitative multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assays for the differential diagnosis of influenza-like illness. BMC Infect Dis 10:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Abeywardena H, Jex AR, Firestone SM, McPhee S, Driessen N, Koehler AV, Haydon SR, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Stevens MA, Gasser RB. 2013. Assessing calves as carriers of Cryptosporidium and Giardia with zoonotic potential on dairy and beef farms within a water catchment area by mutation scanning. Electrophoresis 34:2259–2267. doi: 10.1002/elps.201300146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). 2014. Principles and methods of validation of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases, chapter 1.1.5. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, 7th ed. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France: http://www.oie.int/international-standard-setting/terrestrial-manual/access-online/. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Branscum A, Gardner I, Johnson W. 2005. Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling. Prev Vet Med 68:145–163. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Christensen R, Johnson WO, Branscum AJ, Hanson TE. 2011. Bayesian ideas and data analysis: an introduction for scientists and statisticians. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. 2000. WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325–337. doi: 10.1023/A:1008929526011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. 1993. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 46:423–429. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Callow LL. 1984. Protozoal and rickettsial diseases, p 264 Animal health in Australia, vol 5 Australian Bureau of Animal Health/Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stewart NP, Uilenberg G, de Vos AJ. 1996. Review of Australian species of Theileria, with special reference to Theileria buffeli of cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 28:81–90. doi: 10.1007/BF02250731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kubota S, Sugimoto C, Kakuda T, Onuma M. 1996. Analysis of immunodominant piroplasm surface antigen alleles in mixed populations of Theileria sergenti and T. buffeli. Int J Parasitol 26:741–747. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(96)00047-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Altangerel K, Battsetseg B, Battur B, Sivakumar T, Batmagnai E, Javkhlan G, Tuvshintulga B, Igarashi I, Matsumoto K, Inokuma H, Yokoyama N. 2011. The first survey of Theileria orientalis infection in Mongolian cattle. Vet Parasitol 182:343–348. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sivakumar T, Tattiyapong M, Fukushi S, Hayashida K, Kothalawala H, Silva SSP, Vimalakumar SC, Kanagaratnam R, Meewewa AS, Suthaharan K, Puvirajan T, de Silva WK, Igarashi I, Yokoyama N. 2014. Genetic characterization of Babesia and Theileria parasites in water buffaloes in Sri Lanka. Vet Parasitol 200:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Perera PK, Gasser RB, Jabbar A. Assessment of sequence variability in a p23 gene region within and among genotypes of the Theileria orientalis complex from Australia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



