Summary
The Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) protein was discovered in Drosophila as a tumor suppressor in both neural stem cells (neuroblasts) and epithelia. In neuroblasts, Lgl relocalizes to the cytoplasm at mitosis, an event attributed to phosphorylation by mitotically activated aPKC kinase and thought to promote asymmetric cell division. Here we show that Lgl also relocalizes to the cytoplasm at mitosis in epithelial cells, which divide symmetrically. The Aurora A and B kinases directly phosphorylate Lgl to promote its mitotic relocalization, whereas aPKC kinase activity is required only for polarization of Lgl. A form of Lgl that is a substrate for aPKC, but not Aurora kinases, can restore cell polarity in lgl mutants but reveals defects in mitotic spindle orientation in epithelia. We propose that removal of Lgl from the plasma membrane at mitosis allows Pins/LGN to bind Dlg and thus orient the spindle in the plane of the epithelium. Our findings suggest a revised model for Lgl regulation and function in both symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions.
Highlights
-
•
Aurora kinases directly phosphorylate Lgl during mitosis
-
•
Aurora phosphorylation of Lgl drives relocalization to the cytoplasm at mitosis
-
•
Relocalization of Lgl promotes mitotic spindle orientation in epithelia
-
•
Removal of Lgl from the plasma membrane may promote Pins-Dlg interactions
Bell et al. describe a new role for the Lgl tumor suppressor in mitotic spindle orientation. They show that Aurora kinases phosphorylate Lgl to drive a dramatic relocalization of the protein during mitosis that is necessary for normal orientation of mitotic spindles in epithelial cells.
Introduction
The Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) protein was first discovered as a tumor suppressor in the fruit fly Drosophila [1–3]. Mutants in lgl produce tumors in Drosophila epithelial tissues and in the brain [1]. The Lgl protein was later shown to function in cell polarity, which is disrupted in lgl mutant tumors [4–6]. In both epithelial cells and neuroblasts (neural stem cells), Lgl acts to restrict the localization of apical polarity determinants to the apical membrane domain [4–7]. These apical determinants include the atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), Par6, Cdc42, and Bazooka/Par3 [8–10]. Thus, Lgl is thought to have a common function in epithelia and neuroblasts.
Despite these commonalities between epithelial polarity and neuroblast polarity, recent results suggested that Lgl may be regulated differently in the two cell types. In epithelial cells, which are constitutively polarized and divide symmetrically, Lgl localizes to the basolateral membrane because it is excluded from the apical membrane upon phosphorylation by aPKC [11–13]. In neuroblasts, which only polarize at mitosis and divide asymmetrically, Lgl is initially removed apically but is then removed from the entire plasma membrane so that it relocalizes to the cytoplasm during mitosis [11, 14]. This relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm was proposed to be dependent on its phosphorylation by aPKC and to be important for asymmetric cell division because it would allow aPKC to act upon cell-fate determinants such as Miranda and Numb [11, 14]. Such a model is plausible in neuroblasts because removal of Lgl from the membrane requires three putative aPKC phosphorylation sites and because aPKC becomes activated and polarized specifically in mitosis, after activation of the mitotic Aurora A kinase, just before Lgl is removed from the plasma membrane [11, 14].
Here, we show that Lgl also relocalizes to the cytoplasm during mitosis in both the Drosophila wing disc and follicle cell epithelia. Since aPKC is thought to be constitutively active at the apical domain of epithelial cells, it is not clear how aPKC could account for the sudden mitotic relocalization of Lgl. Instead, we show that mitotic kinases Aurora A and B directly phosphorylate Lgl to mediate its relocalization during mitosis. We then construct a mutant form of Lgl that can be phosphorylated by aPKC, but not by Aurora kinases, and investigate its localization and function in vivo. Our findings suggest a revised model of Lgl regulation and function in both epithelia and neuroblasts. Note that similar findings were recently reported by Carvalho et al. [15].
Results and Discussion
Lgl Becomes Cytoplasmic during Mitosis in the Drosophila Wing Epithelium
The localization of polarity determinants during mitosis has been well characterized in asymmetrically dividing neuroblasts of Drosophila. In contrast, how polarity determinants are localized in epithelial cells during mitosis remains poorly understood. We therefore live imaged several fluorescently tagged apical and basolateral polarity determinants during epithelial mitosis in the Drosophila larval wing imaginal disc. We find that most GFP-tagged polarity determinants—including Crb, Par6, Baz, Dlg, and Scrib—retain their polarized localization through mitosis, whereas Lgl-GFP relocalizes to the cytoplasm (Figures 1A–1F). The relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm is complete because no Lgl-GFP can be detected on the plasma membrane in mitotic cells at the edge of a clone expressing Lgl-GFP (Figures 1G and 1H; Movies S1 and S2 available online). Similar observations of Lgl-GFP were previously noticed in the Drosophila embryonic epithelium [16]. Quantification is provided in Figure S3.
Mitotic Relocalization of Lgl Does Not Depend on aPKC Kinase Activity
Since the aPKC kinase was proposed to be responsible for mitotic relocalization of Lgl in neuroblasts, we tested whether aPKC kinase activity was required for this event in epithelial cells. We find that clones of aPKC417 kinase-dead mutant cells can still relocalize Lgl-GFP to the cytoplasm at mitosis in the wing imaginal disc, and similar results were obtained with other kinase-dead alleles (Figure 1I; Movie S3). We further find that an anti-phospho-Lgl antibody strongly stains both wild-type and aPKC-null mutant mitotic cells (Figure S1). In contrast, mutation of the three potential aPKC phosphorylation sites in Lgl (Lgl3A-GFP) completely prevents relocalization to the cytoplasm (Figure 1J) [11, 12, 14]. These results show that mitotic relocalization of Lgl does not depend on phosphorylation of Lgl by aPKC and suggest that a different kinase must phosphorylate Lgl on at least one of the three key serine residues that control its association to the plasma membrane.
Aurora Kinases Directly Control Relocalization of Lgl at Mitosis in the Wing Epithelium
The mitotic Aurora A and B kinases are strong candidates to phosphorylate Lgl in mitosis, since they are well known to be activated specifically in mitosis and to have a consensus motif (RX[S/T]) that is found within the Lgl tripartite phosphorylation sequence [17]. Aurora A and B are thought to have some distinct targets because the aurA gene is required for timely entry into mitosis whereas the aurB gene is required for cytokinesis [17]. However, these kinases are also highly similar to one another and can have common targets, such as the centromere protein CENP-A, suggesting that they may have some redundant functions [18, 19]. Compared to wild-type wing epithelia expressing Lgl-GFP, the mitotic relocalization of Lgl-GFP is dramatically delayed in aurA mutant clones (Figure 1K; Movie S3). We used the VX-680 compound, which can inhibit the kinase activity of both Auroras, to test redundancy of the Auroras. Acute treatment of wing epithelia in culture with VX-680 leads to a complete blockage of Lgl-GFP relocalization, even in cells that have already rounded up in preparation for mitosis (Figures 1L and 1M; Movie S3). Phosphorylation of Lgl as determined by western blotting with the p-Lgl antibody also reveals that inhibition of Auroras with VX-680 strongly reduces Lgl phosphorylation (Figure 1N). To test whether Aurora A and B can directly phosphorylate Lgl, rather than acting through another kinase, we performed in vitro kinase assays with purified Aurora A and B kinases. We find that both Aurora kinases can directly phosphorylate the key Lgl tripartite phosphorylation motif, but not when the three serines are mutated to alanine (Lgl3A; Figure 1O). These results show that Aurora A and B kinases can directly phosphorylate Lgl and suggest that this phosphorylation event is required for relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm during mitosis.
Generation of an Aurora-Insensitive Form of Lgl
Our findings raise the question of which of the three serines is in fact phosphorylated by Aurora kinases. Only the first and third serines match the RX[S/T] consensus motif for Auroras, suggesting that the middle site may be an exclusive site for aPKC (Figure 2A). Consistently, mutation of only the first and third serines (LglASA) abolishes Aurora A phosphorylation, whereas mutation of the middle serine (LglSAS) does not affect Aurora A phosphorylation in vitro (Figure 2B). When expressed in wing or follicle cell epithelia, the Aurora-insensitive LglASA-GFP completely fails to relocalize to the cytoplasm during mitosis (Figures 2C and 2D). However, LglASA-GFP is still polarized normally during interphase, unlike Lgl3A-GFP (Figures 2E–2G). Together, the above results indicate that regulation of Lgl during cell polarization and mitosis is mediated by distinct kinases: aPKC and Aurora A/B, respectively (Figure 2H).
Aurora Kinases Phosphorylate Lgl to Trigger Mitotic Spindle Orientation in Wing Disc Epithelia
We next sought to establish the relative functional importance of Aurora kinase phosphorylation of Lgl in vivo. To do so, we performed rescue experiments in lgl mutant clones with wild-type Lgl-GFP, with Aurora-insensitive LglASA-GFP, or with a membrane-tethered myristylated Lgl-GFP (myrLgl-GFP) that cannot be removed from the plasma membrane by either aPKC or Auroras. We find that Lgl-GFP rescues cell polarity in lgl mutant wing discs, as expected (Figure 2I). In contrast, both LglASA-GFP and myrLgl-GFP rescue cell polarity (Figures 2J–2M) but reveal mitotic spindle orientation defects (Figures 2N and 2O). The degree of spindle orientation failure is comparable to that of pins or mud mutants, being slightly stronger than the pins phenotype but slightly weaker than the mud phenotype (Figure 2O). These results indicate that phosphorylation of Lgl by Aurora kinases is required for normal mitotic spindle orientation in the wing epithelium. We also observe an additional role for Lgl in promoting spindle formation and clonal growth in this tissue (Figure S2).
Aurora Kinases Phosphorylate Lgl to Trigger Mitotic Spindle Orientation in the Follicle Cell Epithelium
To confirm our findings in another epithelial tissue, we examined the follicle cell epithelium that surrounds the developing egg chamber. We find that Lgl-GFP relocalizes to the cytoplasm during mitosis in follicle cells (Figures 3A and 3G). Relocalization is not affected in aPKC kinase-dead or null mutant clones (Figures 3B and 3C, G). However, Lgl3A-GFP, myrLgl-GFP, and LglASA-GFP all fail to relocalize to the cytoplasm during mitosis, indicating that phosphorylation by Aurora A/B kinases is required to relocalize Lgl to the cytoplasm (Figures 3D–3G and S3). Like wild-type Lgl-GFP, both the myrLgl-GFP and LglASA-GFP constructs rescue cell polarity in lgl mutant follicle cell clones (Figures 3H–3K). However, unlike wild-type Lgl-GFP, neither the myrLgl-GFP nor the LglASA-GFP construct was able to restore normal mitotic spindle orientation in lgl mutant clones in the follicle cell epithelium (Figures 3L–3T). Together, these results indicate that relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm upon phosphorylation by Aurora kinases is necessary for mitotic spindle orientation in the follicle cell epithelium.
Aurora-Mediated Phosphorylation of Lgl Is Dispensable in Neuroblasts
Since the original proposal that aPKC phosphorylates Lgl to relocalize it to the cytoplasm was based on results in neuroblasts [11, 14], we decided to re-examine regulation of Lgl in this system (Figure 4A). In larval brain neuroblasts, we find that Lgl-GFP behaves as previously described [11, 14], being removed from the entire plasma membrane during mitosis (Figure 4B). Aurora-insensitive LglASA-GFP behaves differently, being removed apically but remaining localized at the basal plasma membrane during mitosis (Figure 4C). Finally, myrLgl-GFP remains localized to the entire plasma membrane during mitosis and recruits aPKC along with it (Figure 4D). These results indicate that aPKC kinase activity is normally responsible for removing Lgl from the apical domain, whereas activation of Aurora A/B kinases removes Lgl from the entire plasma membrane during mitosis—as in epithelial cells.
We next examined the ability of our different Lgl constructs to rescue lgl mutant clones in neuroblasts. Compared to wild-type neuroblasts, loss of lgl in clones leads to ectopic activation of aPKC, which then causes relocalization of Miranda to the cytoplasm and symmetric cell division (Figures 4E and 4F). Expression of Lgl-GFP or LglASA-GFP in lgl mutant clones was able to rescue polarization of Miranda and asymmetric cell division, as well as spindle orientation (Figures 4G and 4H). Thus, Aurora-mediated relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm at mitosis is not essential for asymmetric cell division because Lgl remains polarized at the plasma membrane due to the action of aPKC, which is then sufficient to allow polarization of other substrates such as Miranda. When polarization of Lgl was completely prevented by expression of myrLgl-GFP in lgl mutant clones, it resulted in an inhibition of aPKC activity, as revealed by spreading of Miranda around the entire plasma membrane (Figure 4I). Finally, we find that mitotic spindle orientation is normal in lgl mutant neuroblasts rescued by expression of Lgl-GFP, LglASA-GFP, or myrLgl-GFP (Figure 4J). These results indicate that Aurora-mediated relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm at mitosis is dispensable for asymmetric cell division and spindle orientation in neuroblasts.
Our results suggest a revised model for Lgl regulation and function in both symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions. In the case of asymmetric cell divisions, our findings revise the prevailing notion that mitotic activation of aPKC is solely responsible for displacing Lgl into the cytoplasm [11, 14]. Instead, aPKC phosphorylation of Lgl can only remove Lgl from the apical domain of these cells. Aurora A/B kinases are then directly responsible for phosphorylating Lgl during mitosis to mediate its removal from the entire plasma membrane and relocalization into the cytoplasm (Figure 4K). This distinction between the action of aPKC and Aurora kinases on Lgl was not originally obvious because they are almost simultaneously activated during asymmetric cell division [11, 14]. Furthermore, the possibility that Aurora directly phosphorylates Lgl was tested using an anti-phospho-Lgl antibody that only recognizes the second serine in the tripartite motif, which is not an Aurora site [14]. Nevertheless, all other elements of the current model of asymmetric division from remain valid (Figure 4K).
Notably, relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm is dispensable for spindle orientation in neuroblasts, presumably due to the neuroblast-specific expression of Inscuteable (Insc), an apical protein that can bind to Pins/LGN and orient the spindle [20, 21] (Figure 4K). After apical recruitment by Insc, Pins/LGN forms a complex with Gαi and Mud/NUMA to orient the spindle in the apical-basal axis [21–24] (Figure 4K). Thus, Pins/LGN does not strictly depend on forming a complex with Dlg for apical-basal spindle orientation in neuroblasts, even though this complex has an essential role in epithelia and other systems [20, 25–27]. In support of this view, ectopic expression of Insc in epithelial cells is sufficient to override the endogenous planar spindle orientation and to re-orient the spindle in the apical-basal axis [28].
In the case of symmetrically dividing epithelial cells, a similar mechanism operates to regulate Lgl localization, which is then essential for spindle orientation in the plane of the epithelium (Figure 4L). aPKC phosphorylation is once again responsible only for polarization of Lgl, while Aurora A/B phosphorylation is responsible only for mitotic relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm. This distinction is much more obvious in epithelial cells, because Lgl is constitutively polarized by aPKC activity, whereas Aurora A/B kinases are only activated during mitosis. Relocalization of Lgl has a key role in promoting mitotic spindle orientation in epithelial cells, which are known to depend upon Dlg, Pins/LGN, and Mud/NUMA to orient the spindle in the plane of the epithelium [21, 22, 24–26, 29]. Removal of Lgl from the plasma membrane is presumably necessary for Pins/LGN to bind Dlg and to initiate spindle orientation. Lgl is able to bind directly to the Dlg GUK domain after Lgl has been phosphorylated by aPKC [30]. Efficient binding of Pins/LGN to the Dlg GUK domain would therefore require removal of Lgl from the membrane. In addition, Aurora A phosphorylation of Ser436 of Pins/LGN was proposed to be essential for it to interact with the Dlg GUK domain and to orient the mitotic spindle [27]. Thus, these data indicate that Aurora kinases control the onset of spindle orientation by phosphorylating both Lgl and Pins/LGN to disrupt any Lgl-Dlg binding and to induce the Pins/LGN-Dlg interaction in epithelial cells (Figure 4M). Notably, the pins mutant phenotype is weaker in imaginal discs than follicle cells, which suggests the existence of another Dlg-binding protein that may act in parallel with Pins in this tissue.
In conclusion, the Lgl tumor suppressor is regulated by similar mechanisms in both symmetric and asymmetric divisions. The aPKC kinase controls polarization of Lgl, whereas the Aurora A and B kinases control mitotic relocalization of Lgl to the cytoplasm in both epithelia and neuroblasts. Mitotic relocalization of Lgl is essential to promote mitotic spindle orientation in epithelia, but not in neuroblasts. Future work on Lgl and its role as a tumor suppressor should consider not only its function at the cell cortex but also its role in regulating the mitotic spindle. Finally, Aurora kinases are known to be overexpressed in many human cancers, and the Lgl protein may be an important target for Auroras in promoting tumor formation and progression.
Experimental Procedures
Drosophila Genetics
The following strains were used: FRT42B aPKCpsu141, FRT42B aPKCpsu417, FRT42B aPKCpsu265 [31]; FRT82B aurA14641 [6]; Crb-GFP [32]; UAS-Baz-mCherry [33]; UAS-Lgl-GFP, UAS-Lgl3A-GFP [34]; UAS-Dlg-GFP [35]; UAS-Par6-GFP [36]; Scrib-GFP [37]; UAS-AurA-GFP [38]; FRT40A lgl4, aurA87Ac-3, lgl334, FRT42B aPKCK06403, Df(3R)Exel6163, dlg1, dlgM52 (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Centre); and UAS-AurB-RNAi (KK library). UAS-myrLgl-GFP, UAS-LglASA, and UAS-LglASA-GFP constructs were generated for this study. Additional methods are described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Cancer Research UK and by a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award to B.J.T.
Footnotes
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Supplemental Information
References
- 1.Bryant P.J., Schubiger G. Giant and duplicated imaginal discs in a new lethal mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 1971;24:233–263. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(71)90097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mechler B.M., McGinnis W., Gehring W.J. Molecular cloning of lethal(2)giant larvae, a recessive oncogene of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1985;4:1551–1557. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03816.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jacob L., Opper M., Metzroth B., Phannavong B., Mechler B.M. Structure of the l(2)gl gene of Drosophila and delimitation of its tumor suppressor domain. Cell. 1987;50:215–225. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90217-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lützelschwab R., Klämbt C., Rossa R., Schmidt O. A protein product of the Drosophila recessive tumor gene, l (2) giant gl, potentially has cell adhesion properties. EMBO J. 1987;6:1791–1797. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bilder D., Li M., Perrimon N. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science. 2000;289:113–116. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee C.Y., Andersen R.O., Cabernard C., Manning L., Tran K.D., Lanskey M.J., Bashirullah A., Doe C.Q. Drosophila Aurora-A kinase inhibits neuroblast self-renewal by regulating aPKC/Numb cortical polarity and spindle orientation. Genes Dev. 2006;20:3464–3474. doi: 10.1101/gad.1489406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee C.Y., Robinson K.J., Doe C.Q. Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation. Nature. 2006;439:594–598. doi: 10.1038/nature04299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tepass U. The apical polarity protein network in Drosophila epithelial cells: regulation of polarity, junctions, morphogenesis, cell growth, and survival. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012;28:655–685. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.St Johnston D., Ahringer J. Cell polarity in eggs and epithelia: parallels and diversity. Cell. 2010;141:757–774. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thompson B.J. Cell polarity: models and mechanisms from yeast, worms and flies. Development. 2013;140:13–21. doi: 10.1242/dev.083634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Betschinger J., Mechtler K., Knoblich J.A. The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl. Nature. 2003;422:326–330. doi: 10.1038/nature01486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hutterer A., Betschinger J., Petronczki M., Knoblich J.A. Sequential roles of Cdc42, Par-6, aPKC, and Lgl in the establishment of epithelial polarity during Drosophila embryogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2004;6:845–854. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Betschinger J., Eisenhaber F., Knoblich J.A. Phosphorylation-induced autoinhibition regulates the cytoskeletal protein Lethal (2) giant larvae. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wirtz-Peitz F., Nishimura T., Knoblich J.A. Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: Aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization. Cell. 2008;135:161–173. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Carvalho C.A., Moreira S., Ventura G., Sunkel C.E., Morais-de-Sá E. Aurora A triggers Lgl cortical release during symmetric division to control planar spindle orientation. Curr. Biol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.053. Published online December 4, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang J., Zhou W., Dong W., Watson A.M., Hong Y. From the cover: directed, efficient, and versatile modifications of the Drosophila genome by genomic engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:8284–8289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900641106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carmena M., Ruchaud S., Earnshaw W.C. Making the Auroras glow: regulation of Aurora A and B kinase function by interacting proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009;21:796–805. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zeitlin S.G., Barber C.M., Allis C.D., Sullivan K.F. Differential regulation of CENP-A and histone H3 phosphorylation in G2/M. J. Cell Sci. 2001;114:653–661. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.4.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kunitoku N., Sasayama T., Marumoto T., Zhang D., Honda S., Kobayashi O., Hatakeyama K., Ushio Y., Saya H., Hirota T. CENP-A phosphorylation by Aurora-A in prophase is required for enrichment of Aurora-B at inner centromeres and for kinetochore function. Dev. Cell. 2003;5:853–864. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00364-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Siegrist S.E., Doe C.Q. Microtubule-induced Pins/Galphai cortical polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts. Cell. 2005;123:1323–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Siller K.H., Doe C.Q. Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009;11:365–374. doi: 10.1038/ncb0409-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gonzalez C. Spindle orientation, asymmetric division and tumour suppression in Drosophila stem cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007;8:462–472. doi: 10.1038/nrg2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mapelli M., Gonzalez C. On the inscrutable role of Inscuteable: structural basis and functional implications for the competitive binding of NuMA and Inscuteable to LGN. Open Biol. 2012;2:120102. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bergstralh D.T., Haack T., St Johnston D. Epithelial polarity and spindle orientation: intersecting pathways. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2013;368:20130291. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bergstralh D.T., Lovegrove H.E., St Johnston D. Discs large links spindle orientation to apical-basal polarity in Drosophila epithelia. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:1707–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bellaïche Y., Radovic A., Woods D.F., Hough C.D., Parmentier M.L., O’Kane C.J., Bryant P.J., Schweisguth F. The Partner of Inscuteable/Discs-large complex is required to establish planar polarity during asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Cell. 2001;106:355–366. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00444-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Johnston C.A., Hirono K., Prehoda K.E., Doe C.Q. Identification of an Aurora-A/PinsLINKER/Dlg spindle orientation pathway using induced cell polarity in S2 cells. Cell. 2009;138:1150–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Egger B., Boone J.Q., Stevens N.R., Brand A.H., Doe C.Q. Regulation of spindle orientation and neural stem cell fate in the Drosophila optic lobe. Neural Dev. 2007;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-2-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nakajima Y., Meyer E.J., Kroesen A., McKinney S.A., Gibson M.C. Epithelial junctions maintain tissue architecture by directing planar spindle orientation. Nature. 2013;500:359–362. doi: 10.1038/nature12335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhu J., Shang Y., Wan Q., Xia Y., Chen J., Du Q., Zhang M. Phosphorylation-dependent interaction between tumor suppressors Dlg and Lgl. Cell Res. 2014;24:451–463. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim S., Gailite I., Moussian B., Luschnig S., Goette M., Fricke K., Honemann-Capito M., Grubmüller H., Wodarz A. Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:3759–3771. doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang J., Zhou W., Dong W., Hong Y. Targeted engineering of the Drosophila genome. Fly (Austin) 2009;3:274–277. doi: 10.4161/fly.9978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pope K.L., Harris T.J. Control of cell flattening and junctional remodeling during squamous epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2008;135:2227–2238. doi: 10.1242/dev.019802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tian A.G., Deng W.M. Lgl and its phosphorylation by aPKC regulate oocyte polarity formation in Drosophila. Development. 2008;135:463–471. doi: 10.1242/dev.016253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Koh Y.H., Popova E., Thomas U., Griffith L.C., Budnik V. Regulation of DLG localization at synapses by CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation. Cell. 1999;98:353–363. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81964-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.David D.J., Tishkina A., Harris T.J. The PAR complex regulates pulsed actomyosin contractions during amnioserosa apical constriction in Drosophila. Development. 2010;137:1645–1655. doi: 10.1242/dev.044107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Venken K.J., Schulze K.L., Haelterman N.A., Pan H., He Y., Evans-Holm M., Carlson J.W., Levis R.W., Spradling A.C., Hoskins R.A., Bellen H.J. MiMIC: a highly versatile transposon insertion resource for engineering Drosophila melanogaster genes. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:737–743. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Berdnik D., Knoblich J.A. Drosophila Aurora-A is required for centrosome maturation and actin-dependent asymmetric protein localization during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:640–647. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00766-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.