Skip to main content
Annals of Family Medicine logoLink to Annals of Family Medicine
. 2015 Jan;13(1):23–26. doi: 10.1370/afm.1735

Geographic and Specialty Distribution of US Physicians Trained to Treat Opioid Use Disorder

Roger A Rosenblatt 1,, C Holly A Andrilla 1,, Mary Catlin 1,2, Eric H Larson 1
PMCID: PMC4291261  PMID: 25583888

Abstract

PURPOSE

The United States is experiencing an epidemic of opioid-related deaths driven by excessive prescribing of opioids, misuse of prescription drugs, and increased use of heroin. Buprenorphine-naloxone is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder and can be provided in office-based settings, but this treatment is unavailable to many patients who could benefit. We sought to describe the geographic distribution and specialties of physicians obtaining waivers from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to prescribe buprenorphine-naloxone to treat opioid use disorder and to identify potential shortages of physicians.

METHODS

We linked physicians authorized to prescribe buprenorphine on the July 2012 DEA Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) Waived Physician List to the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile to determine their age, specialty, rural-urban status, and location. We then mapped the location of these physicians and determined their supply for all US counties.

RESULTS

Sixteen percent of psychiatrists had received a DEA DATA waiver (41.6% of all physicians with waivers) but practiced primarily in urban areas. Only 3.0% of primary care physicians, the largest group of physicians in rural America, had received waivers. Most US counties therefore had no physicians who had obtained waivers to prescribe buprenorphine-naloxone, resulting in more than 30 million persons who were living in counties without access to buprenorphine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States opioid use and related unintentional lethal overdoses continue to rise, particularly in rural areas. Increasing access to office-based treatment of opioid use disorder—particularly in rural America—is a promising strategy to address rising rates of opioid use disorder and unintentional lethal overdoses.

Keywords: buprenorphine, opiate substitution treatment, rural health, primary health care, opiate addiction, opioid treatment programs

INTRODUCTION

Of the 30 leading diseases and injuries in the United States, drug-use disorders have accounted for the greatest increase in deaths and years of life lost between 1990 and 2010.1 The largest portion of these deaths results from the ingestion of prescription and illicit opioids,2,3 exceeding the number of people dying in car accidents.4

Addressing this epidemic will require a new approach to the treatment of problems related to opioid use. To expand treatment options beyond opioid treatment programs, the US Congress passed the Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA 2000).5 This expansion of harm-reduction treatment allows office-based physicians who complete training to obtain a waiver that permits prescribing buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder. This study examines the extent to which the population in the United States has local access to physicians who received a waiver and can provide effective harm-reduction treatment for opioid use disorder.

METHODS

This research used multiple data sources: The American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Masterfile (2012), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) DATA Waived Physician List (July 2012), and the US Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) 2004 Economic Research Service County Typology data.6

AMA and DEA data were linked using the physician’s DEA number. The physician’s practice ZIP code was used to identify the practice county. The county’s USDA Urban Influence Code was used to assign all physicians to 1 of 4 geographic categories.

We excluded physicians who had an inactive practice status or were older than 80 years, whose addresses were outside the United States, or who were medical residents not in their final training year. The resulting file included 829,044 physicians of whom 18,225 (2.2%) had waivers on the July 2012 DEA DATA list. Physicians on the DATA Waived Physician List who did not match to the AMA Masterfile were included in the map showing the location of the physicians with waivers.

The University of Washington’s Institutional Review Board determined this study to be exempt from human subjects research requirements on November 11, 2012.

RESULTS

Specialty Distribution of Physicians With Waivers

Of the 2.2% of US physicians who had obtained waivers to prescribe buprenorphine on the DEA DATA list, 41.6% were psychiatrists, and slightly more than one-third (36.7%) practiced in the primary care specialties of family or internal medicine. Nationally, the 5 specialties with the highest rates of physicians with waivers were psychiatry (16.2%), pain management (15.2%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (5.3%), family medicine (3.6%), and internal medicine (2.1%) (Supplemental Appendix).

Age and Sex

Physicians aged younger than 35 years, excluding residents, represented 7.8% of the workforce, but only 2.6% of the buprenorphine prescribers, and they were significantly less likely than older physicians to have obtained a waiver (P <.001). Physicians are eligible to obtain a waiver after 2 years of residency, but only 0.7% of this cohort had obtained a waiver compared with 2.3% of physicians aged 35 or older. Almost 3% of physicians aged 55 to 64 years received waivers, the highest proportion of any age-group. Overall, significantly more men than women had received a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine (2.4% vs 1.8%, respectively, P<.001).

County and Rural-Urban Status: Geographic Maldistribution of Physicians With Waivers

Only 46.6% of US counties (1,465 of 3,143) had a physician who could prescribe buprenorphine (Table 1); 90.3% of the US population resided in these counties. Thirty million people, or 9.7% of the US population, were living in counties that had no physician with a waiver, 21.2 million of them in rural counties and 8.8 million in metropolitan counties. Of the counties that had no physicians who could prescribe buprenorphine, 82.1% were in rural areas.

Table 1.

Supply of Physicians With DEA DATA Waivers in US Counties, by Rural-Urban Status

Metropolitana Adjacent to Metropolitanb Micropolitan, Not Adjacent to Metropolitanc Small and Remote Rural Countiesd

Characteristic UIC 1–2 UIC 3–7 UIC 8 UIC 9–12 Total
US population, No. (%) 260,479,400 (83.6) 33,691,096 (10.8) 9,677,339 (3.1) 7,744,082 (2.4) 311,591,917 (100.0)
Counties with ≥1 physicians with waivers, No. (%) 789 (72.4) 419 (39.6) 132 (46.8) 125 (17.5) 1,465 (46.6)
Counties with no physician with a waiver, No. (%) 301 (27.6) 639 (60.4) 150 (53.2) 588 (82.5) 1,678 (53.4)
Total counties, No. (%) 1,090 (34.7) 1,058 (33.7) 282 (9.0) 713 (22.7) 3,143 (100.0)
Physicians with waivers per 100,000 residents, No. 6.3 3.3 4.2 3.1 5.8
Physicians with waivers, % 90.4 6.1 2.3 1.3 100.0

DATA = Drug Addiction Treatment Act; DEA = Drug Enforcement Administration; UIC = Urban Influence Code.

Note: counties were classified as urban or into 1 of 3 categories of rural using the US Department of Agriculture UIC.

a

Counties with an urban core with a population of at least 50,000.

b

Counties that are geographically adjacent to a metropolitan area whose largest town/urban cluster has 10,000–49,999 residents.

c

Counties that are not adjacent to a metropolitan area and whose largest town/urban cluster has 10,000–49,999 residents.

d

Counties whose largest town has fewer than 10,000 residents regardless of proximity to a micropolitan county.

Rural counties, especially more isolated ones, had a substantially lower supply of physicians with waivers per 100,000 residents. Most, 83.6%, of the US population were living in urban counties, where 91.3% of American physicians and 90.4% of physicians with waivers practiced. In contrast, 2.4% of the US population were living in the smallest and most remote counties, where only 0.9% of American physicians and 1.3% of the physicians with waivers practiced.

The regional distribution of physicians who can prescribe buprenorphine is striking. Figure 1 shows that physicians with waivers are concentrated on the east and west coasts, leaving wide swaths of contiguous counties in the middle of the country without any such physicians. Residents of these counties must travel long distances to receive outpatient buprenorphine treatment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

US counties with physicians with waivers to prescribe buprenorphine.

Note: data source: Drug Enforcement Administration, July 2012. Map date: September 2013.

The percentage of physicians with waivers varied widely by state, from 0.6% in Nebraska to 6.8% in Vermont. The ratio of these physicians to 100,000 population varied 15-fold by state (data available on request).

DISCUSSION

Despite the availability of office-based therapy for the treatment for opioid use disorder—and despite efforts to expand its availability—only 2.2% of American physicians have obtained the waivers required to prescribe buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorders. We found that 90.4% of these physicians were practicing in urban counties, leaving the majority of US counties (53.4%)—most of them rural—with no physician with a DEA DATA waiver.

The relative paucity of these physicians in rural areas is a major barrier to office-based outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder. The per capita supply of physicians with waivers in the most rural counties is one-half the supply in urban settings. Although primary care physicians are the predominant providers of health care in rural America, very low percentages of family physicians and general internists (3.0%) have obtained a DEA DATA waiver. Psychiatrists, who comprise more than 40% of the physicians with waivers, are rare or nonexistent in rural America.7

Additionally, obtaining a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine does not ensure that physicians will incorporate this modality into their treatment of opioid use disorder. The presence of a physician who has obtained a waiver does not necessarily mean that buprenorphine treatment is available.810 In the only national study of this issue, the average physician with a waiver was currently treating 26 patients (mean) with buprenorphine,11 and 25% of the physicians had not treated any patients since obtaining their waiver. Other studies found that those physicians actually prescribing buprenorphine were treating a relatively small number of patients.12,13

The low rate of young physicians with waivers suggests that they are not being trained during residency in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Obtaining a waiver for buprenorphine and mastering some of the nuances of treatment during residency could increase the likelihood that these future practitioners would identify and treat opioid use disorder.

The complexity and stigma surrounding office-based treatment of patients with opioid use disorder dissuade many physicians from adopting buprenorphine as a treatment option.14 Barriers to providing buprenorphine therapy include a lack of institutional support, inadequate support from nursing and office staff, a lack of mental health practitioners, payment issues, and opposition from practice partners.12,14 Coordinated efforts to train and support teams of clinicians in specific rural practices, including mental health clinicians comfortable with on-site harm-reduction therapies, and reimbursing this care at a reasonable amount would be promising first steps to addressing these barriers.

This study is limited by several factors. First, although we had access to information about the amount of opioids prescribed in all 50 states, there were no data on the number of patients who would meet the criteria for addiction or benefit from buprenorphine therapy. Thus it is possible that some counties that had one or more physicians with waivers may have a greater need for additional buprenorphine-prescribing physicians than counties with physicians with no waivers at all. Second, it was not possible using the DEA DATA Waived Physician List to determine whether buprenorphine treatment was available for patients with opioid use disorder in the county where they live, as obtaining a waiver does not guarantee that the physicians will add this treatment option to their practices.

The distribution of physicians with DEA DATA waivers across US counties leaves rural counties with little or no access to office-based opioid use disorder treatment. Rural counties, especially more isolated ones, have a substantially lower supply of buprenorphine-prescribing physicians per 100,000 residents. Office-based treatment of opioid use disorder with buprenorphine has been effective in expanding the options available to patients and physicians. Increasing the number of physicians with DEA DATA waivers could improve access to treatment for patients—particularly in rural America—and is a promising strategy to address the rising rates of opioid use disorder and lethal unintentional overdoses.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: Catlin reports consultancies for University Research Co, LLC.

Funding support: This study was supported by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services (grant #U1CRH03712); and by the Life Sciences Discovery Fund (LSDF) of the State of Washington.

Prior presentations: Northwest Regional Rural Health Conference, March 18–20, 2014, Spokane, Washington.

Supplementary materials: Available at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/13/1/23/suppl/DC1/.

References


Articles from Annals of Family Medicine are provided here courtesy of Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

RESOURCES