Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1975 Apr;7(4):466–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.4.466

Laboratory Evaluation of a Rapid, Automated Susceptibility Testing System: Report of a Collaborative Study

Clyde Thornsberry *, T L Gavan †,‡,§,¶,#,, J C Sherris †,‡,§,¶,#,, Albert Balows †,‡,§,¶,#,, J M Matsen †,‡,§,¶,#,♠,1, L D Sabath †,‡,§,¶,#,♠,2, Fritz Schoenknecht †,‡,§,¶,#,, L D Thrupp †,‡,§,¶,#,, J A Washington II †,‡,§,¶,#,
PMCID: PMC429164  PMID: 1147582

Abstract

Seven laboratories participated in a collaborative study to evaluate the Autobac 1 system. Results obtained with this assay system were compared to those obtained by the standardized Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion test, and each of these two methods was compared to the agar dilution technique. Comparison of the Autobac 1 and the disk diffusion results from the seven laboratories showed an overall average of 91.5% interpretive agreement with the 17 antimicrobial agents tested. The distribution in the levels of Autobac 1/disk diffusion agreement was such that with 13 antimicrobial drugs agreement was 90% or higher; with three, between 85 and 90%; and with one, 77% (nitrofurantoin). Comparison of the Autobac 1 and disk diffusion tests with the International Collaborative Study agar dilution test showed that both methods gave levels of agreement with the International Collaborative Study agar dilution technique that were generally high and equivalent. The average overall agreement between the agar dilution test and each of the other two methods was approximately 90%. Disagreements that did occur tended to involve organisms that were drug susceptible by the Autobac 1 system but intermediate or resistant by the other two methods. This was in part due to the narrow intermediate interpretive zone of the Autobac 1 test. In reproducibility studies with the Autobac 1 and disk diffusion methods, no significant differences were observed between the interpretive reproducibility of the two methods.

Full text

PDF
466

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ericsson H. M., Sherris J. C. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217(Suppl):1+–1+. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Isenberg H. D., Reichler A., Wiseman D. Prototype of a fully automated device for determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in the clinical laboratory. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):980–986. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.980-986.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES