Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Feb;135(2):333–334. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.458

On the role of the endogenous opioid system in regulating epidermal homeostasis

Andrzej Slominski 1,*
PMCID: PMC4293046  NIHMSID: NIHMS636180  PMID: 25573044

Abstract

The presence of functional opioid receptors on epidermal keratinocytes, with attendant regulation of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, indicate their novel role in maintaining epidermal homeostasis. Expression of proenkephalin precursors and neuropeptide products in the same compartment opens an opportunity to study the role of this endogenous opioid circuitry, with its regulators, in modulating epidermal barrier function.

Keywords: skin, opioids, opioid receptors, homeostasis, pathology

Expression of functional δ-opioid receptors (DOR) in the epidermis

In this issue of JID, Dr. Bigliardi’s team presents evidence that DORs are expressed in the suprabasal layers of the epidermis and that they are phenotypically active (Neumann et al., 2014). Specifically, ligand activation of DORs can stimulate the ERK 1/2 MAPK pathway with attendant effects on keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation programs. The authors conclude that DORs activity in human keratinocytes can profoundly affect epidermal morphogenesis and homeostasis with implications in skin physiology and pathology.

An endogenous opioid signaling system in the epidermis

Interestingly, DORs are expressed predominantly in the suprabasal differentiated layers of human epidermis, with expression patterns that are almost identical to those of proenkephalin (PENK) and Met- and Leu-enkephalin antigens (Slominski et al., 2011). Because enkephalins serve as ligands for DORs, both findings (Neumann et al., 2014; Slominski et al., 2011) identify a novel opioid system composed of endogenously produced enkephalins that would act in para- or autocrine fashion to regulate epidermal homeostasis.

Because the epidermis, serving as a physical and biological barrier (Feingold and Elias, 2014), senses and reacts to environmental factors to regulate epidermal and skin homeostasis (Slominski and Wortsman, 2000; Slominski et al., 2012), the local endogenous opioidogenic system should also be regulated by environmental factors in order to play a significant role in the regulation of local homeostasis. In agreement with this concept, expression of PENK and PENK-derived neuropeptides is regulated by TLR4 (LPS) and TLR2 (PAM3CSK4) agonists as well as by ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation (Slominski et al., 2011), indicating that production of PENK-derived neuropeptides can be stimulated by biological and physical insults. However, it still remains to be determined whether similar biological and physical insults regulate DOR expression in a fashion similar to the regulation of melanocortin receptors, which are widely expressed in human skin (Bohm et al., 2006; Slominski et al., 2012). In addition, the proposed role of DORs in wound healing (Neumann et al., 2014) would require determining whether physical disruption of the skin barrier also enhances the expression of PENK as a part of skin wound healing processes; this could be similar to the mechanisms of skin responses to stress that rely on complex neuropeptides action (McLaughlin and Zagon, 2012; Slominski et al., 2000; Slominski et al., 2013).

Potential functions of the cutaneous opioid system

As indicated by Neumann et al. (Neumann et al., 2014), in conjunction with regulated production of PENK-derive peptides (Slominski et al., 2011) and the complex role of opioids in regulating cell proliferation and the function of epithelia (McLaughlin and Zagon, 2012), the local opioid system would include opioid growth factor (OGF) – OGF receptors (OGFr) axis, acting as a homeostatic regulator of the epidermis as proposed by (McLaughlin and Zagon, 2012).

Additional functions of local opioid activity would be secondary to a well-documented immunomodulatory role of PENK-derived peptides that include stimulation of innate immunity, which is conserved across many species (Metz-Boutigue et al., 2003; Tasiemski et al., 2000). These functions were discussed previously in the context of regulating local skin immunity and antimicrobial activities (Slominski et al., 2011). The stimulation of the innate immune activity by opioids could be crucial in regulating wound healing and restoration of epidermal integrity, in particular when the latter is disrupted by UVB radiation (Slominski et al., 2012; Slominski et al., 2011).

Consistent with the above is deregulated expression of PENK antigens in pathological skin, including psoriasis, inflammatory dermatoses and neoplastic processes (Slominski et al., 2011). The above pattern of PENK expression nicely complements the hypothesis that DOR’s activity is spatially and temporally controlled in human skin, affecting skin physiology and pathology (Neumann et al., 2014), with implications in dermatopharmacology, as also proposed by (McLaughlin and Zagon, 2012; Slominski et al., 2012; Slominski et al., 2011)

Integration of local opioid activity with the skin neuroendocrine system

It must be noted that skin cells and cutaneous nerve endings also express: 1) other opioid receptors, including μ -and κ-OR (McLaughlin and Zagon, 2012; Neumann et al., 2014; Slominski et al., 2012), 2) proopiomelanocortin (POMC) together with a molecular system regulating its processing towards β- endorphins, 3) melanocortin peptides that include PC1 and PC2 convertases, and 4) a CRH signalling system regulating POMC processing in a context dependent manner (Slominski et al., 2000; Slominski et al., 2013). PC1 and PC2 convertases process both PENK and POMC precursors towards final regulatory neuropeptides in a regulated fashion. Thus, the extended local opioid system (McLaughlin and Zagon, 2012; Neumann et al., 2014; Slominski et al., 2000; Slominski et al., 2011) can be integrated into the function of the broader skin neuroendocrine system regulating homeostasis on local and systemic levels, including sending signals to the brain (Slominski and Wortsman, 2000; Slominski et al., 2012).

In this context, the extended opioid cutaneous system is highly organized, encoding mediators and receptors coupled differentially to signal transduction systems and endowed with stress-neutralizing activities. This system helps to maintain skin integrity and to restrict stress-dependent disruptions of internal homeostasis. From the evolutionary point of view, such a system could develop in the integument, as proposed for the HPA axis (Slominski, 2007), in order to protect the integrity of the integument. During evolution the DOR system would adapt as an efficient regulator of central and systemic homeostasis. Thus, the paper by Neumann et al. (Neumann et al., 2014) opens new areas of dermatological exploration.

Acknowledgement

Writing of this commentary was supported in part by NIH grant R01AR052190 and R21 AR066505-01A1 to AS. The critical reading of this commentary by Dr Postlethwaite is greatly appreciated.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The author states no conflict.

References

  1. Bohm M, Luger TA, Tobin DJ, et al. Melanocortin receptor ligands: new horizons for skin biology and clinical dermatology. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1966–75. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Feingold KR, Elias PM. Role of lipids in the formation and maintenance of the cutaneous permeability barrier. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1841:280–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McLaughlin PJ, Zagon IS. The opioid growth factor-opioid growth factor receptor axis: homeostatic regulator of cell proliferation and its implications for health and disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:746–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Metz-Boutigue MH, Kieffer AE, Goumon Y, et al. Innate immunity: involvement of new neuropeptides. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:585–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neumann C, Bigliardi-Qi M, Widmann C, et al. The [delta]-Opioid Receptor Affects Epidermal Homeostasis via ERK-Dependent Inhibition of Transcription Factor POU2F3. J Invest Dermatol. 2014 doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.370. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Slominski A. A nervous breakdown in the skin: stress and the epidermal barrier. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:316–69. doi: 10.1172/JCI33508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Slominski A, Wortsman J. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:457–87. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.5.0410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Slominski A, Wortsman J, Luger T, et al. Corticotropin releasing hormone and proopiomelanocortin involvement in the cutaneous response to stress. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:979–1020. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA, Skobowiat C, et al. Sensing the environment: regulation of local and global homeostasis by the skin’s neuroendocrine system. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2012;212(v, vii):1–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19683-6_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA, Zbytek B, et al. Regulated proenkephalin expression in human skin and cultured skin cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:613–22. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA, Zbytek B, et al. Key Role of CRF in the Skin Stress Response System. Endocr Rev. 2013;34:827–84. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tasiemski A, Verger-Bocquet M, Cadet M, et al. Proenkephalin A-derived peptides in invertebrate innate immune processes. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2000;76:237–52. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES