Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine the functional biocompatibility of low-concentration SDS-decellularized porcine aortic roots in vivo. A previously developed process was modified for 9- and 15-mm-diameter aortic roots to facilitate implantation into the porcine abdominal aorta (n=3) and juvenile sheep right ventricular outflow tract (n=7), respectively. Native allogeneic aortic roots were used as controls. Acellular porcine roots explanted from pigs at weeks were largely repopulated with stromal cells of appropriate phenotype, and there was evidence that macrophages were involved in the regenerative process. Native allogeneic roots were subject to a classic allograft rejection response. Acellular porcine roots explanted from sheep at 6 months showed evidence of appropriate cellular repopulation, again with evidence of a role for macrophages in the regenerative process. There was some degree of calcification of two of the explanted acellular roots, likely due to incomplete removal of DNA before implantation. Native allogeneic ovine roots were subject to a classic allograft rejection response involving T cells, which resulted in overtly calcified and damaged tissues. The study highlighted (1) the importance of removal of DNA from acellular porcine valved roots to avoid calcification and (2) a role for macrophages in the regeneration of low-concentration SDS-decellularized aortic roots, as has been reported for other acellular biological extracellular matrix scaffolds.
Introduction
The most critical and most prone to failure of the four heart valves is the aortic valve. Current aortic valve replacements all have limitations.1,2 Cryopreserved aortic valve allografts have satisfactory clinical outcomes in selected patients,3 however, they suffer structural deterioration and have a limited lifespan in pediatric cases, associated with the generation of antibodies to donor histocompatibility antigens.4,5 The pulmonary autograft switch operation (Ross procedure) is the only clinical procedure that provides a living functional aortic valve. The cryopreserved allograft used to replace the pulmonary valve will, however, suffer stenosis over time.6,7
The lack of an ideal valve replacement, together with an understanding that the immune response is a significant component of allograft valve degeneration,8 has led to the development and clinical use of acellular allogeneic heart valves. Elkins et al.9 were the first to report early clinical results of pulmonary allografts treated by the SynerGraft™ process (CryoLife).10,11 The CryoValve SG™ pulmonary valve has been reported to perform well clinically in the short- to midterm.12–17 There has been one report on good results at 1 year for CryoValve SG aortic valves18 in a small group of adults. Acellular allografts produced using different processes have also been used clinically,19–21,22 with good results for both pulmonary valves21 at 4 years and aortic valves at 19 months,22 for valves decellularized using low-concentration SDS.
Despite these advances, acellular allografts still suffer from limitations of availability, particularly in sizes suitable for children. An ideal solution would be aortic valves, or pulmonary valves for the Ross procedure, available off the shelf in a range of sizes. Hence, several groups have pursued research and development of acellular porcine valves. CryoLife applied the SynerGraft process to porcine pulmonary valves and preclinical results in sheep were encouraging.10,23 Commercially available SynerGraft valves, however, failed catastrophically in children due to a severe inflammatory reaction.24 Subsequent identification of whole cells, DNA, and the α-Gal epitope in the walls of SynerGraft porcine valves indicated incomplete decellularization as the likely cause.25 AutoTissue GmbH later commercialized acellular porcine pulmonary valves; Matrix P® (2004) and Matrix PPlus® (2005) produced using a proprietary process based on 1% sodium deoxycholate. Again, laboratory studies, preclinical studies in sheep, and early clinical studies showed considerable promise.26–28 Later reports on the performance of these valves were, however, variable.29–31 Cicha et al.32 reported on four adolescent patients implanted with Matrix P valves, who were reoperated due to early to midterm graft failure (12–15 months). The explanted valves showed massive inflammatory and fibrotic responses at the distal region, lumen narrowing, and low recolonization of the decellularized matrix. Analyses of preimplant control valves revealed incomplete decellularization.
The evidence indicates that incomplete decellularization of porcine valves is associated with graft failure. Considerable caution will be needed before the introduction of porcine valves decellularized using alternative processes in the future. We have developed processes for the decellularization of porcine aortic roots, which have shown effective cell removal, excellent biocompatibility, and preservation of biomechanical function.33–36 In this study, we report on early preclinical studies of the low-concentration SDS-decellularized porcine aortic valves in the descending aorta of pigs and the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) of sheep. The studies revealed an intriguing involvement of macrophages in the remodeling of the acellular tissue.
Materials and Methods
Porcine aortic roots
Aortic roots were harvested from 7 kg (9 mm diameter) and 25 kg (15 mm diameter), large, white female pigs sourced from the UK Home Office Approved farms. Following humane killing, hearts were aseptically harvested and placed into sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; ICN Biomedical) plus 10 KIU.mL−1 aprotinin (Bayer), 100 U.mL−1 penicillin (Invitrogen), and 100 μg.mL−1 streptomycin (Invitrogen). Aortic roots were dissected, trimmed of excess tissue, rinsed in supplemented PBS, and stored dry on moist filter paper at −40°C.
Ovine aortic roots
Eight 25 kg Suffolk sheep were sourced from “Fazenda Experimental Gralha Azul PUCPR,” Brazil. The sheep were humanely sacrificed and the aortic roots were dissected as above.
Decellularization of porcine aortic roots
This technique has been described previously.33–35 A total of 16 porcine aortic roots (15 mm diameter) were decellularized. The adventitial and intimal surfaces of the aortic wall were treated with 0.5% (w/v) agarose gel containing 1.25% (w/v) trypsin (type II-S from porcine pancreas, 1800 BAEE U.mg−1; Sigma) sparing the leaflets, in a humidified container for 4 h at 37°C. Unless stated otherwise, all subsequent washes were at ambient temperature with agitation. Roots were washed (3×30 min) in PBS containing 0.1% (w/v) EDTA (Sigma), 45 μg.mL−1 trypsin inhibitor (Sigma), and 10 KIU.mL−1 aprotinin, before they were immersed in a hypotonic Tris buffer (HTB; 10 mM tris, pH 8.0 containing 0.1% [w/v] EDTA plus 10 KIU.mL−1 aprotinin) and incubated for 16 h at 4°C. The roots were washed in PBS plus protease inhibitors and incubated in 0.1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; Calbiochem) in HTB for 24 h before they were washed overnight (∼16 h) in PBS containing aprotinin (10 KIU.mL−1) and incubated in a nuclease solution (RNase, 1 U.mL−1 and DNase 50 U.mL−1 in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 50 mg.mL−1 bovine serum albumin; pH 7.5; all Sigma) for 4 h at 37°C. The roots were then washed in PBS for 3 days at 37°C, immersed in peracetic acid (0.1% w/v; Sigma) for 3 h before the final washes, and stored in PBS before analysis or cryopreservation. Two roots were processed for histological analysis, six were utilized for biomechanical testing, and eight were cryopreserved for shipping to Brazil for implantation in juvenile sheep.
Three 9-mm-diameter porcine aortic roots were decellularized, as described above, with the exception that trypsin treatment was not used. The roots were dry frozen before implantation in pigs.
Cryopreservation of 15 mm acellular porcine and native ovine aortic roots
Each root was cryopreserved in 100 mL cryopreservation solution (82.5 mL Hanks balanced salt solution with 2.5 mL 1 M HEPES buffer and 15 mL 16% (w/w) dimethyl sulfoxide; Pharmacy Manufacturing Unit; Ipswich NHS Hospital, UK). Frozen porcine roots were shipped on dry ice to the University Veterinary Hospital “Hospital Veterinário Para Animais De Companhia” PUCPR São José Dos Pinhais, Brazil, where they were stored at −80°C until implanted.
Biomechanical tests
Root dilation tests were performed as described by Korossis et al.36 The roots were pressurized from 0 to 120 mmHg in 20 mmHg intervals. At each increment, an image of the root was recorded using a video camera. The images were calibrated and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus™ (Media Cybernetics). The dilation of each root at a given pressure was recorded as the external root diameter half way between two reference points. Uniaxial tensile testing to failure was carried out on circumferential and axial aortic wall strips (5×20 mm) using a Howden tensile testing machine according to Korossis et al.34 Specimens were preloaded to 0.01 N and loaded to failure using a positive ramp function at 10 mm.min−1 at 20°C. Failure was taken at the first decrease in load during extension. Load and extension data were acquired at a rate of 20 Hz and converted to stress–strain. Data acquisition was performed using the MTT.exe software. The stress–strain behavior of the specimens was analyzed by means of the elastin (EI-E)-phase and collagen (Coll-E)-phase moduli, transition stress (σT) and strain (ɛT), ultimate tensile strength (σUTS), and failure strain (ɛUTS).
Implantation of acellular allogeneic and fresh allogeneic 9-mm-diameter porcine aortic roots in the abdominal aorta of pigs
Operative procedure
Three fresh and three acellular porcine aortic roots were implanted in 25 kg, large, white female pigs. All procedures were conducted under appropriate UK Home Office Project and Personal Licences. The animals received prophylactic amoxicillin 15 mg.kg−1 and were premedicated, anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and monitored throughout the procedure.
The abdomen was opened through a midline incision and the infrarenal aorta was exposed. The aorta was clamped and divided without removing any aortic tissue. The valve was anastomosed proximally and distally using a 6/0 nonabsorbable, monofilament, and continuous stitch. The aorta was declamped and hemostasis secured. The abdominal wall was then closed in layers. Pigs received a 20 mg subcutaneous dose of a low-molecular-weight heparin (Clexane; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer) for 6 days postoperatively and were sacrificed at 6 weeks (pentobarbital; 20% w/v; 1 mL.kg−1). A laparotomy was performed and the aortic root explanted.
Implantation of acellular xenogeneic porcine and native allogeneic ovine 15 mm aortic roots in the RVOT of juvenile sheep
Seven acellular 15 mm porcine aortic roots and seven native ovine aortic roots were implanted in the RVOT of juvenile sheep (3–4 month old; 19–22 kg) at the Hospital Veterinário Para Animais De Companhia PUCPR in accordance with the institutional guidelines for animal care. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Researches PUC-PR. The cryopreserved roots were gently thawed at 37°C, washed aseptically in 0.9% (w/v) saline solution, trimmed, and kept moist until implanted.
Operative procedure
The animals received prophylactic gentamicin 4 mg.kg−1 and cephalosporin 2 mg.kg−1. The operations were performed through a left thoracotomy through the third intercostal space using normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, as described previously.26 A segment of the pulmonary artery was resected and the pulmonary valve leaflets were removed. The grafts were interposed in the orthotopic position and anastomosed using 5/0 prolene continuous suture proximally and distally.
Monitoring
All of the animals were weighed at 10, 30, and 60 days. At 6 months, the grafts were retrieved under general anesthesia and the animals were sacrificed (KCl 19.1% iv).
Analysis of explanted roots
All explanted roots were surveyed macroscopically and photographed. The explanted 15 mm aortic roots were cryopreserved and shipped back to the University of Leeds, UK, for analysis. Three explanted decellularized porcine (EDP 1,3,7) and three explanted sheep controls (ES 1,3,7) were dissected longitudinally to obtain blocks for histological and immunohistochemical investigations. The remaining portions of these three roots were used for calcium analysis. Four explanted roots from each group (EDP 2,4,5,6 and ES 2,4,5,6) were utilized for biomechanical testing and calcium analysis.
Histological analysis
Tissue specimens were fixed (10% [v/v] neutral buffered formalin), dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin wax. Ten serial sections of 5 μm were taken longitudinally at six levels, 150 μm apart. One section at each level was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Van Gieson, Miller's elastin, and Von Kossa. Sections were dehydrated and mounted in DPX, and images were captured using an Olympus microscope (OL BX51, Olympus) and digital camera (Evolution MP color).
Immunocytochemical analysis
The primary antibodies, dilutions, antigen retrieval methods, and control tissues used are listed in Table 1. Isotype control antibodies and omission of the primary antibodies were used to verify antibody specificity and as negative controls. Immunolabeling using the avidin–biotin complex (ABC) immunoperoxidase system (pig explants) was carried out at room temperature, and Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) was used as the diluent and wash buffer. Sections were incubated in 3% (v/v) H2O2 before antigen retrieval and blocked with avidin–biotin blocking reagents (Vector Labs) and 20% (v/v) rabbit serum (Vector Labs). Sections were incubated with 50 μL of primary antibody for 1 h (overnight at 4°C for MAC 387), 50 μL of secondary antibody (biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse Ig F[ab']2 fragments; Dako) for 30 min, and 50 μL of horseradish peroxidase streptavidin (Vector Labs) for 30 min with three washes between each step. The bound antibody was visualized using Sigma Fast 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Sections were counterstained in hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted in DPX (VWR).
Table 1.
Pig explants | Sheep explants | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antibody | Supplier | Dilution | Antigen retrieval method | Control | Detection | Control | Detection |
Von Willebrand factor/factor VIII complex Rabbit anti-human |
Dako A0082 |
1:500 | Citrate microwave | Porcine tonsil | IP | MaxArray™ Sheep tissue (Zymed) | Anti-rabbit/mouse envision Dako K 5007 |
α-Smooth muscle actin Mouse anti-human |
Dako M0851 clone A4 |
1:500 | Citrate microwave | Porcine colon | IP | MaxArray Sheep tissue (Zymed) | Anti-rabbit/mouse envision Dako K 5007 |
CD3 Mouse anti-human |
Vision Biosystems NCL-CD3-365 |
1:50 | Heat induced | Porcine spleen | IP | MaxArray Sheep tissue (Zymed) | Anti-rabbit/mouse envision Dako K 5007 |
Macrophage Mouse anti-human |
Serotec MCA874G Clone MAC387 |
1:50 | Trypsin | Porcine spleen | IP | MaxArray Sheep tissue (Zymed) | Anti-rabbit/mouse envision Dako K 5007 |
Ki67 Mouse anti-human |
Dako M7240 Clone MIB-1 |
1:50 | Citrate microwave | Porcine skin | IP | MaxArray Sheep tissue (Zymed) | Anti-rabbit/mouse envision Dako K 5007 |
Vimentin | Vision Biosystems NCL-L-VIM-V9 Clone V9 |
1:400 | Citrate microwave | Porcine aorta | IP | MaxArray Sheep tissue (Zymed) | Anti-rabbit/mouse envision Dako K 5007 |
Citric acid buffer consisted of 10 mM citric acid pH 6.0, sections were microwaved on full power for 10 min. Trypsin antigen retrieval was carried out by incubating in 0.1% (w/v) trypsin in 0.1% (w/v) CaCl2 at a pH of 7.8 for 10 min at 37°C. EDTA heat-induced epitope retrieval was carried out in 10 mM Tris buffer 1 mM EDTA, pH 9.0, sections were microwaved on full power for 10 min.
IP, immunoperoxidase.
Immunolabeling with the Dako EnVision System-HRP (sheep explants) involved blocking the sections with peroxidase block (Dako), incubation with the primary antibody for 30 min, and incubation in peroxidase labeled polymer (Envision solution; DAKO EnVision™ +System, HRP). The bound antibody was visualized by incubation in DAB for 5–10 min, and sections were counterstained, dehydrated, and mounted as above.
Quantitative calcium analysis by inductively coupled plasma—mass spectrometry (ICPMS)
Tissue samples (n=3–7; 2–4 mm2) were freeze-dried to constant weight, digested in 0.25 mL of nitric acid and 0.25 mL of hydrogen peroxide (both Romil-SpA, Super Purity Acids & Reagents), and heated to 90°C for 2 h. Calcium analyses were performed on an Elan 6100 ICP-MS (Perkin-Elmer SCIEX) calibrated using Ca ICPMS ARISTAR single element standard (Merck BDH).
Data analysis
Quantitative data are expressed as the mean±95% confidence interval. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by calculation of the minimum significant difference (MSD; p<0.05) between group means using the T method.
Results
Histology of decellularized porcine aortic roots
Representative images of H&E-stained sections of the native and decellularized 15 mm roots are shown in Figure 1 and showed no evidence of cells or cell remnants in the acellular tissues.
In vivo assessment of decellularized porcine aortic roots in the descending aorta of pigs
One pig from the acellular group developed signs of abdominal discomfort 2 days postoperatively and was humanely killed. A postmortem examination revealed a small bowel obstruction. A gross examination of the acellular and native control roots explanted at 6 weeks revealed major differences. The explanted acellular roots had lost their leaflets and their walls were soft and pliable with no overt signs of calcifications, thrombi, or vegetations. The explanted native porcine roots had retracted thickened leaflets and their walls were overtly calcified and hard.
A neointima had formed on the luminal surface of native control tissues (Fig. 2A) with a confluent layer of endothelial cells (Fig. 2B). The medial layer of the native control tissues was severely damaged (Fig. 2A, B) and heavily calcified (Fig. 2C). The calcified areas were heavily infiltrated by CD3+ T cells (Fig. 2D). There were few MAC-positive cells, indicating a paucity of macrophages. The cells in the neointima and adventia were vimentin positive. The cells in the neointima and blood vessels in the adventia were α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) positive.
H&E-stained sections of the explanted acellular roots revealed a demarcation between the implanted tissue and neointima (Fig. 2E). The medial layer showed no evidence of damage and calcification except at the suture points (Fig. 2F). Interstitial cells positive for α-SMA and vimentin were present in the media (Fig. 2G, H). There was no evidence of CD3+ T cells in the acellular explants, with the exception of a few CD3+ cells at the suture points. The most striking observation for the acellular root tissue was the presence of macrophages (MAC-positive cells) in a strongly demarcated line below the neointima of the explanted tissue from both implants (Fig. 2I, J).
In vivo assessment of decellularized porcine aortic roots in the RVOT of juvenile sheep
The animals were weighed at 0, 10, 30, and 60 days and steadily increased in weight over the period. Roots were explanted at 6 months.
The explanted seven sheep aortic control roots were all (explanted sheep; ES1-7) hard, rigid, and heavily calcified at explantation. The root walls and leaflets were retracted. Five of the explanted decellularized porcine roots (explanted decellularized porcine; EDP1 and 4–7) were soft with no evidence of thrombus, vegetation, pannus, or stenosis. The leaflets were undamaged, and calcification was only evident at the suture points. EDP2 and EDP3 had no thrombus or vegetation, however, there was some pannus formation and stenosis and they were rubbery/firm to touch. The leaflets of these two explants were thickened and retracted. Example macroscopic images are shown in Figures 3.
Histology of explanted ovine roots ES1, 3, and 7 showed extensive damage. The damaged walls had a thickened neointima and a developed adventitia. The leaflets were retracted and thickened (Fig. 4A, B). The tissues were heavily calcified (Fig. 4C, D). CD3+ cells were present around the damaged areas of the wall (Fig. 4E, F) and in the leaflets. The CD3+ cells were of a proliferative phenotype, as revealed by Ki-67 labeling (Fig. 4G). There was a notable paucity of macrophages associated with the immunological rejection response (Fig. 4H).
An overview of the histology of the explanted decellularized porcine roots EDP 1, 3, and 7 is presented in Figure 5. Roots EDP1 and EDPD7 were integrated with remodeling of the acellular tissue, with formation of a neointima and well-formed adventitia. Minimal calcification was observed, limited to the suture points (Fig. 5D, F). Root EDP3 also showed integration and remodeling, however, there was a line of calcification in the central region of the aortic wall (Fig. 5E).
There was a central acellular wall area in these explants surrounded by a cellular area (Fig. 6A), highlighted by immunostaining for vimentin (Fig. 6B). The leaflets of the decellularized aortic roots retained their trilaminar structure. They were recellularized with stromal cells and covered in a layer of Von Willebrand Factor-positive cells (Fig. 6C, D). Immunostaining for α-SMA showed that cells in the medial area of the aortic wall were of the smooth muscle cell phenotype and also highlighted the presence of blood vessels in the adventitia (Fig. 6E). In the leaflets, the cells were largely α-SMA negative with the exception of the cells at the surface (Fig. 6F). As observed in the pig study, the most striking feature was the presence of MAC-positive cells demarking the interface between the acellular portion of the aortic wall and the recellularized areas. This was evident in all three of the explanted aortic roots (Fig. 6G, I, J). Macrophages were not evident in the leaflets of any of the aortic roots nor were CD3+ cells. T cells were only found in EDP3 associated with the calcified area of the aortic wall (Fig. 6H).
Quantitative calcium analysis
The native and decellularized porcine tissue had very low calcium content, as did the explanted decellularized porcine and ovine aortic valve leaflets (Fig. 7). The explanted ovine aortic wall tissue contained 43,485 to 472,728 μg calcium per gram of tissue. The explanted decellularized porcine aortic wall tissue also showed a highly variable calcium content ranging from 925 to 69,191 μg.g−1.
Biomechanical studies of native, decellularized, and explanted aortic roots
There was no significant difference in the dilation of the fresh and decellularized roots up to 120 mmHg. There was also no difference in the mechanical properties of the preimplant native and decellularized aortic wall tissue (Table 2). However, there was a small but significant reduction in the thickness of the tissue following decellularization (p<0.05).
Table 2.
EI-E(MPa) | Coll-E (MPa) | σT (MPa) | ɛT (%) | σUTS (MPa) | ɛUTS (%) | Thickness (mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Axial | |||||||
FP | 0.11±0.02 | 1.83±0.70 | 0.19±0.08 | 62.7±11.43 | 0.74±0.30 | 108.2±13.8 | 1.73±0.32 |
DP | 0.10±0.04 | 2.04±1.42 | 0.18±0.11 | 62.2±13.8 | 0.70±0.35 | 127.9±14.1 | 1.29±0.27 |
EDP | 0.13±0.07 | 1.53±0.49 | 0.05±0.02 | 21.0±10.6 | 0.49±0.09 | 55.8±7.2 | 2.0±1.14 |
p<0.05 vs. FP,DP | p<0.05 vs. FP,DP | ||||||
ES | 0.28±0.24 | 4.3±2.19 | 0.10±0.04 | 20.00±6.63 | 0.87±0.42 | 47.20±12.9 | 1.50±0.34 |
p<0.05 vs. FP, EDP | p<0.05 vs. FP,DP | p<0.05 vs. FP,DP | |||||
Circumferential | |||||||
FP | 0.15±0.03 | 4.95±0.78 | 0.44±0.01 | 72.1±8.47 | 1.96±0.12 | 112.6±16.9 | 2.02±0.1 |
DP | 0.11±0.06 | 4.18±1.84 | 0.45±0.22 | 65.9±13.3 | 1.85±0.86 | 112.5±20 | 1.46±0.13 |
p<0.05 vs. F | |||||||
EDP | 0.12±0.08 | 4.13±3.57 | 0.10±0.06 | 23.7±12.25 | 0.72±0.15 | 49.9±21.4 | 1.69±0.11 |
p<0.05 vs. F, DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP | ||||
ES | 0.40±0.20 | 3.42±0.93 | 0.08±0.03 | 14.0±4.66 | 0.75±0.22 | 39.90±7.0 | 1.72±0.34 |
p<0.05 vs. DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP | p<0.05 vs. F, DP |
Uniaxial tensile tests of the aortic wall tissue (n=4–6) were carried out in the axial and circumferential directions. Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by calculation of the MSD between group means (p<0.05) using the T method.
FP, fresh porcine; DP, decellularized porcine; EDP, explanted decellularized porcine; ES, explanted sheep; EI-E, elastin phase slope; Coll-E, collagen phase slope; σT, transition stress; ɛT, transition strain; σUTS, ultimate tensile strength; ɛUTS, failure strain.
For the explanted decellularized porcine compared to the preimplant aortic wall tissue, there was no significant difference in the thickness, elastin phase modulus, or collagen phase modulus in the axial or circumferential directions (Table 2). In the axial direction, there was no significant difference in the transition stress or the ultimate tensile stress. In the circumferential direction, the transition stress and ultimate tensile stress were reduced (p<0.05). The transition and failure strains were reduced in both directions, indicating a less extensible or permanently extended tissue (Table 2).
For the explanted native ovine valves, there was no preimplant sheep valve data for comparison. The properties were compared to the native and decellularized porcine tissue, although it is recognized that this is not a direct comparison. The elastin phase modulus was higher in the circumferential direction and the collagen phase modulus was higher in the axial direction (p<0.05), indicating a stiffer tissue. The transition stress and ultimate tensile stress were lower in the circumferential direction (p<0.05). The transition and ultimate failure strains were also lower (p<0.05) in the explanted ovine wall tissue in both directions, indicating a less extensible or permanently extended tissue.
Discussion
The aims of this study were to determine the functional biocompatibility of low-concentration SDS-decellularized porcine aortic roots in vivo. A previously developed process33–36 was modified for 9- and 15-mm-diameter aortic roots to facilitate implantation into growing animals. Limited evaluation of the decellularized tissue showed a lack of cells, and biomechanical tests (15 mm roots) showed that the decellularized roots were not significantly affected by the process.
Acellular roots (9 mm) were initially implanted into the descending aorta of pigs in a limited study to assess biocompatibility in the hemodynamic environment. Upon explantation at 6 weeks, the acellular roots were not calcified, but had lost their leaflets, most likely due to the more continuous blood flow in the abdominal aorta, which would have kept the leaflets permanently open, causing resorption. In contrast, the explanted native control roots were overtly calcified and the leaflets were present, although retracted. Early calcification of the native allografts may have maintained the rigidity of the leaflets. Although this model had limitations, it revealed some interesting findings. The acellular root walls had largely been regenerated with cells, with a neointima and a luminal surface with a layer of von Willebrand factor-positive cells. There was no calcification of the decellularized roots or the presence of T cells. This was in marked contrast to the native allograft roots, which were overtly calcified, infiltrated with T cells, and severely disrupted, demonstrating the intensity of the immune response to the cellular allografts.
Of particular interest was the presence and pattern of distribution of macrophages in the explanted acellular roots. High-intensity staining for MAC-positive cells was found in a well-demarcated line between the implant and the neointima. Recent knowledge of the plasticity of macrophages favors the idea that the host macrophage response is an essential component of the acellular biological scaffold remodeling process.37,38 The presence of macrophages at the boundary of the implanted root wall tissue with concomitant stromal cell infiltration in the absence of T cells, tissue damage, and fibrosis was highly suggestive that the acellular tissue was undergoing a remodeling process, orchestrated by the macrophages.
It is now recognized that macrophages may adopt heterogeneous phenotypes forming a spectrum from proinflammatory classically activated macrophages (often referred to as M1) to anti-inflammatory, wound healing inflammation-resolving phenotypes involved in homeostasis (referred to as M237–39). Studies conducted by the Badylak group have characterized the macrophage response to a range of acellular extracellular matrix scaffolds (reviewed in Brown et al.37), and they have suggested that a macrophage response is an essential component of the remodeling process of biological extracellular matrix scaffolds.38 It is interesting to note that work published after the completion of the present study on the performance of acellular porcine aortic valves in the RVOT of pigs also demonstrated self-regeneration potential after 15 months and that macrophages with a reparative M2 phenotype were present in high numbers in the repopulated valves.40
The sheep is the most widely used model for evaluation of cardiac valves10,23,26,27 and as an accelerated calcification model most closely modeling human physiology. The acellular porcine roots were implanted into the RVOT to avoid undue suffering of the animals in the event of failure. It should be noted that there were two major differences in the preparation of the acellular porcine aortic roots for the studies in sheep compared to the studies in the pig model.
The larger 15 mm acellular aortic roots were treated with trypsin (to the outer portion of the aortic wall) and cryopreserved before implantation. Upon explantation of the acellular porcine roots, it was evident that two (EDP2 and EDP3) of the seven roots had undergone mild calcification. Explanted acellular porcine roots (EDP1, EDP3, and EDP7) showed regeneration. The leaflets of all three valves were devoid of calcification and were endothelialized. The matrix of the leaflets retained the characteristic trilaminar structure and was populated by α-SMA-negative and vimentin-positive cells, indicating a fibroblastic and not myofibroblastic phenotype. Similar repopulation of decellularized porcine pulmonary valve leaflets in sheep has been reported previously.26–28
The wall of the three acellular explants revealed incomplete recellularization. A neointima had formed on the luminal surface and there was a well-established vasa vasorum. Approximately two-thirds of the wall of all three acellular explants was populated by smooth muscle cells. Interestingly, there was a line of macrophages demarking the nonrepopulated portion in all three acellular explants, again suggesting that the macrophages were orchestrating the repopulation of the acellular tissue as had been observed in the pigs. This feature of the regeneration of acellular porcine cardiac valves in the sheep has not been reported previously, although Erdbrugger et al. noted the presence of some monocytes in the explanted decellularized pulmonary root wall.28 Of note, Leyh et al.41 used immunohistochemical staining for CD11b (Mac-1) in their study of trypsin/EDTA decellularized porcine pulmonary valve repopulation in sheep and found no evidence of positive cells. These differences could be due to a different host response to tissues decellularized using different processes.
There were no T cells present in explanted roots, EDP1 and EDP7. However, a mild infiltrate of CD3+ T cells was associated with a band of calcification in the central portion of the wall of root EDP3. The explanted native allogeneic roots showed extensive calcification of the root walls and a predominant role of T cells in the allogeneic rejection response. Quantitative calcium analysis of all the explanted root tissues supported the histological findings. It is difficult to interpret the calcium data for the decellularized root wall explants since Von Kossa staining revealed calcification at the suture points. Chronic inflammation42 and calcification43 in response to polypropylene sutures in blood vessel walls have been reported previously. Given the gross observation of explanted root EDP2, it was likely that this also had some calcification in the wall. The presence of areas of calcification in the explanted decellularized root tissue also makes interpretation of the biomechanical data difficult. The finding of less extensible tissue following implantation would be in keeping with some degree of calcification of the tissue in situ. Since both axial and circumferential tissue strips were cut from the explanted root wall distal to the leaflets, they would not have avoided the calcification around the suture points. No previous studies of decellularized porcine cardiac valves in sheep have investigated the biomechanical properties of the tissues.10,23,26–28,41
Overall, these studies demonstrated the regenerative potential of low-concentration SDS-decellularized aortic roots in the sheep model and also revealed that the decellularization process was not complete for all of the implanted roots. Additionally, three 15 mm porcine aortic roots were therefore decellularized and analyzed for evidence of residual cells. A close examination of the H&E-stained sections (Fig. 8) revealed residual nuclear material in the central portion of the tissue, confirming incomplete decellularization. It was noteworthy that the area of incomplete decellularization was in the same area of the root wall that was calcified in the explanted decellularized root EDP3, indicating that calcification was most likely associated with residual DNA in the tissue and highlighting the role of DNA as a nidus for calcification. Subsequent studies have focused upon reoptimization of the decellularization process.
Despite obvious limitations, the studies have highlighted (1) the importance of complete decellularization of porcine cardiac valved roots to avoid calcification and (2) the need for further studies of the phenotype of macrophages responding to decellularized porcine cardiac root tissues in large animal models with a view to determining whether they are of the proinflammatory phenotype or express markers indicative of anti-inflammatory, wound healing, inflammation resolving, or fibrolytic phenotypes.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Children`s Heart Surgery Fund, EPSRC, and through WELMEC, a Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC, under grant number WT 088908/Z/09/Z.
Disclosure Statement
E.I. and J.F. are consultants and shareholders in Tissue Regenix Group plc. SK is a shareholder in Tissue Regenix Group plc. Helen Berry–nee Wilcox is now an employee of Tissue Regenix Group plc.
References
- 1.Senthilnathan V., Treasure T., Grunkemeier G., and Starr A.Heart valves: which is the best choice? Cardiovasc Surg 7,393, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gao G., Wu Y., Grunkemeier G.L., Furnary A.P., and Starr A.Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 44,384, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.O'Brien M.F., Harrocks S., Stafford E.G., Gardner M.A., Pohlner P.G., and Tesar P.J.The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements. J Heart Valve Dis 10,334, 2001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dignan R., O'Brien M., Hogan P., Thornton A., Fowler K., Byrne D., Stephens F., and Harrocks S.Aortic valve allograft structural deterioration is associated with a subset of antibodies to human leukocyte antigens. J Heart Valve Dis 12,382, 2003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baskett R.J., Nanton M.A., Warren A.E., and Ross D.B.Human leucocyte antigen-DR and ABO mismatch are associated with accelerated homograft failure in children: implications for therapeutic interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126,232, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryan W.H., Herbert M.A., Dewey T.M., Agarwal S., Ryan A.L., Prince S.L., and Mack M.J.The occurence of postoperative pulmonary homograft stenosis in adult patients undergoing the Ross procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 15,108, 2006 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carr-White G.S., Kilner P.J., Hon J.K.F., Rutledge T., Edwards S., Burman E.D., Pennel D.J., and Yacoub M.H.Incidence, location, pathology and significance of pulmonary homograft stenosis after the Ross operation. Circulation 104Suppl 1,16—20, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hogan P.G., and O'Brien M.F.Improving the allograft valve: does the immune response matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126,1251, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Elkins R.C., Lane M.M., Cappa S.B., McCue C., and Dawson P.E.Humoral immune responds to allograft valve tissue pretreated with an antigen reduction process. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13,82, 2001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O'Brien M.F., Goldstein S., Walsh S., Black K.S., Elkins R., and Clarke D.The SynerGraft valve: a new acellular (non-gluteraldehyde-fixed) tissue heart valve for autologous recellularisation; first experimental studies before clinical implantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11Suppl 1,194, 1999 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Elkins R.C., Dawson P.E., Goldstein S., Walsh S.P., and Black K.S.Decellularised human valve allografts. Ann Thorac Surg 71,S428, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hawkins J.A., Hillman N.D., Lambert L.M., Jones J., Di Russo G.B., Profaizer T., Fuller T.C., Minich L.L., Williams R.V., and Shaddy R.E.Immunogenicity of decellularized cryopreserved allografts in pediatric cardiac surgery: comparison with standard cryopreserved allografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126,247, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bechtel J.F., Gellissen J., Erasmi A.W., Petersen M., Hiob A., Stierle U., and Sievers H.H.Mid-term findings on echocardiography and computed tomography after RVOT-reconstruction: comparison of decellularized (SynerGraft) and conventional allografts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27,410, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tavakkol Z., Gelehrter S., Goldberg C.S., Bove E.L., Devaney E.J., and Ohye R.G.Superior durability of SynerGraft pulmonary allografts compared with standard cryopreserved allografts. Ann Thorac Surg 80,1610, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brown J.W., Elkins R.C., Clarke R.C., Tweddell J.S., Huddleston C.B., Doty J.R., Fehrenbacher J.W., and Takkenberg J.J.M.Performance of the CryoValveSG human decellularised pulmonary valve in 342 patients relative to conventional CryoValve at a mean follow-up of four years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139,339, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burch P.T., Aditya K.K., Lambert L.M., Houbkov R., Shaddy R.E., and Hawkins J.A.Clinical performance of decellularised cryopreserved valved allografts compared with standard allografts in the right ventricular outflow tract. Ann Thorac Surg 90,1301, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ruzmetov M., Shah J.J., Geiss D.M., and Fortuna R.S.Decellularised versus standard valve allografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: A single institution comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143,543, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zehr K.J., Yagubyan M., Connolly H.M., Nelson S.M., and Schaff H.V.Aortic root replacement with a novel decellularized cryopreserved aortic homograft: postoperative immunoreactivity and early results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130,1010, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cebotari S., Tudorache I., Ciubotaru A., Boethig D., Sarikouch S., Goerler A., Lichtenberg A., Cheptanaru E., Barnaciuc S., Cazacu A., Maliga O., Repin O., Maniuc L., Breymann T., and Haverich A.Use of fresh decellularised allografts for pulmonary valve replacement may reduce the reoperation rate in children and young adults: early report. Circulation 124,S115, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.daCosta F.D.A., Dohmen P.M., Duarte D., von Glenn C., Lopes S.V., Filho H.H., da Costa M.B.A., and Konertz W.Immunological and echocardiographic evaluation of decellularised versus cryopreserved allografts during the Ross operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27,572, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.daCosta F.D., Santos L.R., Collatusso C., Matsuda C.N., Lopes S.A., Cauduro S., Roderjan J.G., and Ingham E.Thirteen years experience with the Ross operation. J Heart Valve Dis 18,84, 2009 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.da Costa F.D.A., Costa A.C.B.A., Prestes R., Domanski A.C., Balbi E.M., Ferreira A.D.A., and Lopes S.V.The early and midterm function of decellularised aortic valve allografts. Ann Thorac Surg 90,1854, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldstein S., Clarke D.R., Walsh S.P., Black K.S., and O'Brien M.F.Transpecies heart valve transplant: advanced studies of a bio-engineered xeno-autograft. Ann Thorac Surg 70,1962, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Simon P., Kasimir M.T., Seebacher G., Weigel G., Ullrich R., Salzer-Muhar U., Rieder E., and Wolner E.Early failure of the tissue engineered porcine heart valve SYNERGRAFT™ in pediatric patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23,1002, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kasimir M.T., Rieder E., Seebacher G., Wolner E., Weigel G., and Simon P.Presence and elimination of the xenoantigen Gal (a1,3) Gal in tissue engineered heart valves. Tissue Eng 11,1274, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.dCosta F.D.A., Dohmen P.M., Lopes S.V., Lacerda G., Pohl F., Vilani R., da Costa M.B.A., Vieira E.D., Yoschi S., Konertz W., and da Costa I.A.Comparison of cryopreserved homografts and decellularised porcine heterografts implanted in sheep. Artif Organs 28,366, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dohmen P.M., da Costa F., Yoshi S., Lopes S.V., da Souza F.P., Vilani R., Wouk A.F., da Costa M., and Konertz W.Histological evaluation of tissue engineered heart valves implanted in the juvenile sheep model: is there a need for in vitro seeding? J Heart Valve Dis 15,823, 2006 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Erdbrugger W., Konertz W., Dohmen P.M., Posner S., Ellerbrok H., Brodde O-T., Robenek H., Modersohn D., Pruss A., Holinski S., Stein-Konertz M., and Pauli G.Decellularised xenogeneic heart valves reveal remodeling and growth potential in vivo. Tissue Eng 12,2059, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hiemann N.E., Mani M., Hubler M., Meyer R., Hetzer R., Thieme R., and Bethge C.Complete destruction of a tissue-engineered porcine xenograft in pulmonary valve position after Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139,e67, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Konertz W., Angeli E., Tarusinov G., Christ T., Kroll J., Dohmen P.M., Krogmann O., Franzbach B., Napoleone C.P., and Gargiulo G.Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with decellularised porcine xenografts in patients with congenital heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis 20,341, 2011 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Perri G., Polito A., Esposito C., Albanese S.B., Francalanci P., Pongiglione G., and Carotti A.Early and late failure of tissue engineered pulmonary valve conduits used for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in patients with congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41,1320, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cicha I., Ruffer A., Cesnjevar R., Glockler M., Agaimy A., Daniel W.G., Garlichs C.D., and Dittrich S.Early obstruction of decellularised xenogenic valves in pediatric patients: involvement of inflammatory and fibroproliferative processes. Cardiovasc Pathol 20,222, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Booth C., Korossis S., Wilcox H.E., Watterson K.G., Kearney J.N., Fisher J., and Ingham E.Tissue engineering a cardiac valve prosthesis I: development and histological characterisation of an acellular porcine scaffold. J Heart Valve Dis 11,457, 2002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Korossis S., Booth C., Wilcox H.E., Ingham E.Kearney, J.N., Watterson, K.G., and Fisher, J. Tissue engineering a cardiac valve prosthesis II: biomechanical characterisation of decellularised porcine heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 11,463, 2002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wilcox H.E., Korossis S.A., Booth C., Watterson K.G., Kearney J.N., Fisher J., and Ingham E.Biocompatibility and recellularization potential of an acellular porcine heart valve matrix. J Heart Valve Dis 14,228, 2005 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Korossis S.A., Wilcox H.E., Watterson K.G., Kearney J.N., Ingham E., and Fisher J.In vitro assessment of the functional performance of the decellularised intact porcine aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis 14,408, 2005 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brown B.N., Ratner B.D., Goodman S.B., Amar S., and Badylak S.F.Macrophage polarisation: An opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 33,3792, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brown B.N., and Badylak S.F.Expanded applications, shifting paradigms and an improved understanding of host-biomaterial interactions. Acta Biomater 9,4948, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lech M., and Anders H.-J.Macrophages and fibrosis: how resident and infiltrating mononuclear phagocytes orchestrate all phases of tissue injury and repair. Biochim Biophys Acta 1832,989, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Iop L., Bonetti A., Naso F., Rizzo S., Cagnin S., Bianco R., Lin C.D., Martini P., Poser H., Franci P., Lanfranchi G., Busetto R., Spina M., Basso C., Marchini M., Ganaglia A., Ortolani F., and Gerosa G.Decellularized allogeneic heart valves demonstrate self-regeneration potential after a long-term preclinical evaluation. PLoS One 9,e99593, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leyh R.G., Wilhelmi M., Rebe P., Fischer S., Kofidis T., Haverich A., and Mertsching H.In vivo repopulation of xenogeneic and allogeneic acellular valve matrix conduits in the pulmonary circulation. Ann Thorac Surg 75,1457, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Aarnio P., Harjula A., Lehtola A., Sariola H., and Mattila S.Polydioxanone and polypropylene suture material in free internal mammary artery graft anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 96,741, 1988 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gersak B.Presence of calcium in the vessel walls after end-to-end arterial anastomoses with polydioxanone and polypropylene sutures in growing dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106,587, 1993 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]