Abstract
The chimeric human/mouse anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody (mAb) 2E2 and its further humanized variant h2E2 have been reported to sequester a significant portion of cocaine in plasma and decrease cocaine concentrations in the brain in mice and rats. However, many cocaine users co-abuse alcohol, leading to the formation of the centrally active metabolite cocaethylene. This potentially compromises the efficacy of a cocaine-specific immunotherapy. Because h2E2 has high affinity for cocaethylene as well as cocaine, the ability of h2E2 to prevent cocaethylene entry into the brain was investigated. Mice were infused with h2E2 (1.6 µmol/kg i.v.) or vehicle and after one hour were injected with cocaethylene fumarate (1.2 µmol/kg i.v.). At times from 45 seconds to 60 minutes, brain and plasma were collected and cocaethylene concentrations were measured using GC/MS. In control mice, a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model generated values for cocaethylene distribution and terminal elimination half-lives of 0.5 and 8.1 min respectively. Initial plasma cocaethylene concentrations increased 13-fold from controls in the presence of h2E2. In brain, h2E2 produced a 92% decrease in the area under the time-concentration curve for cocaethylene. The pharmacokinetics of h2E2 were also characterized in detail. A three-compartment model resolved an initial distribution half-life of 4.4 minutes and a second distribution half-life of 4.2 hours, and a terminal elimination half-life of 7.8 days. The ability of h2E2 to protect the brain from both cocaine and cocaethylene predicts that the clinical efficacy of h2E2 will be retained in cocaine users who co-abuse alcohol.
Keywords: cocaethylene, human monoclonal antibodies, cocaine addiction, passive immunotherapy, alcohol abuse, pharmacokinetics
1. Introduction
Active immunization using cocaine vaccines in clinical trials was able to induce the in vivo production of anti-cocaine antibodies that decreased the use of cocaine in some individuals in which the vaccine elicited a strong immune response [1, 2]. This provides proof of concept for the efficacy of immunotherapy for the treatment of cocaine addiction. However, there is considerable variation in the efficacy of the vaccine, as the time it takes to develop an immune response, the amount of antibody elicited, and the affinity and specificity of the antibodies raised varies between individuals [1, 2]. The polyclonal antibodies elicited by cocaine vaccines decrease the concentration of cocaine in the brain of immunized mice and rats, which likely accounts for their clinical efficacy. A chimeric/mixed chain IgG1 anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody (mAb) that has a fully human heavy chain and a murine light chain also prevents cocaine entry into the brain in mice [3], and a recombinant version of this mAb with a humanized light chain inhibits cocaine entry into the brain in rats [4], which predicts efficacy as a passive immunotherapy for cocaine abuse. This reengineered mAb, with the preclinical designation h2E2, has 95% sequence homology with human IgG1 and the recombinant protein is produced in gram quantities in a stably transfected mammalian cell line [4]. This passive immunotherapy could provide a more predictable therapeutic response and could also be used as an adjunct to the active immunization approach using cocaine vaccines.
Many cocaine users concurrently use ethanol [5]. When both ethanol and cocaine are present in the liver, the enzyme carboxylesterase-2 catalyzes a transesterification of the methyl ester moiety to an ethyl ester to produce the psychoactive metabolite cocaethylene [6]. In humans who ingest alcohol, between 18% and 34% of cocaine is metabolized to cocaethylene [7]. Like cocaine, cocaethylene has been shown to rapidly enter the brain where it blocks the dopamine transporter and prevents dopamine reuptake. This leads to elevated post-synaptic dopamine levels, causing a centrally mediated pharmacodynamic response analogous to cocaine [8]. For this reason, a decrease in cocaethylene brain concentrations may predict that efficacy of this passive immunotherapy will be maintained in cocaine users who co-abuse alcohol. The effects of h2E2, or any other immunotherapy, on the disposition of cocaethylene in vivo have not been investigated. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine whether h2E2 antagonizes the in vivo distribution of cocaethylene into the brain.
2. Methods
2.1 Animals
Jugular vein catheterized adult male Swiss Webster mice (25–30g) were purchased from Taconic Farms (Hudson, NY). Free access to food and water was provided. All studies were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, 1996) and under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Cincinnati.
2.2 h2E2 pharmacokinetics
Mice were infused with h2E2 (120 mg/kg i.v over 2 min) and 10 µl blood samples were collected from a small incision at the tip of the tail for up to 4 weeks after injection. The h2E2 concentrations in blood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) described previously [9]. The amount of h2E2 in varying dilutions of blood samples was compared with a standard curve generated using known concentrations of purified recombinant h2E2.
2.3 The effect of h2E2 on cocaethylene pharmacokinetics
A separate set of mice were infused i.v. with either vehicle (phosphate buffered saline) or h2E2 (120 mg/kg, 1.6 µmol/kg ligand binding sites over 2 minutes). One hour later cocaethylene fumarate (1.2 µmol/kg i.v.) was rapidly injected. Sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg i.p.) was injected to anesthetize the mice 3 minutes prior to decapitation. At 0.75, 1.5, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 minutes after cocaethylene injection, mice were decapitated and trunk blood was collected in sodium fluoride (16 mg/0.8 mL of blood) to inhibit enzymatic degradation of cocaethylene and heparin (11 units/0.8 mL blood) to prevent blood coagulation. Blood was centrifuged at 5000 g for 3 min to separate plasma from red blood cells, and the plasma was removed. A separate sample of whole blood (at least 5 µL) was also preserved to measure hemoglobin content. Whole brain was removed and all samples were placed immediately on dry ice then stored at −20° C.
Cocaethylene was extracted from brain and plasma samples, then derivatized, and measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) using procedures modified from Norman et al (2007) [3]. Deuterated cocaethylene served as an internal standard and unlabeled cocaethylene with a certified standard concentration were used to generate a standard curve for quantification.
As reported previously for cocaine [3], to correct for the cocaethylene present in blood in the brain, hemoglobin concentrations were determined in plasma and brain samples using spectrophotometric analysis according to the method reported by Choudhri et al. [10] and from a protocol provided by Pointe Scientific, Inc. (Canton, MI).
2.4 Data analysis
All pharmacokinetic data, including cocaethylene and h2E2 pharmacokinetics, was analyzed using Phoenix® WinNonlin® (by Pharsight, a Certara™ company, St. Louis, MO). All plasma data were initially fit using a single compartment model with a bolus injection and a first order elimination. When the latter method provided a poor fit, a two-compartment model was applied with first order distribution between the first and second compartment with clearance only from the first compartment. When this failed to provide a good fit, a three-compartment model with first-order distribution between all compartments was applied. The primary calculated parameters were the distribution half-lives, the terminal elimination half-life, and the volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss).
Cocaethylene concentrations in the brain over time were also analyzed using WinNonlin. A single-compartment model with first-order input with a lag time and first-order elimination was applied. If this failed to provide a good fit, a two-compartment model with first-order input with a lag time and first-order distribution between the compartments and first-order elimination was applied. The primary calculated parameters from the concentration values as a function of time was area under the time-concentration curve (AUC).
All graphs were generated in SigmaPlot (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA).
3. Materials
Cocaethylene fumarate was provided by the Research Triangle Institute (Chapel Hill, NC) under the National Institute on Drug Abuse Drug Supply Program. Deuterated cocaethylene-D3 (0.1 mg/ml in acetonitrile), used as an internal standard, the certified unlabeled cocaethylene (1 mg/ml in acetonitrile), used to generate a standard curve, and the derivatizing reagent N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane were purchased from Cerilliant (Round Rock, TX). Recombinant h2E2 was produced from stably transfected CHO-cell lines by Catalent Pharmasolutions (Madison WI) using their proprietary GPEx technology [11]. The human hemoglobin standards and control standards were obtained from Pointe Scientific, Inc. All of the other chemicals and immunoreagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Pierce Chemicals (Rockford IL).
4. Results
4.1 mAb h2E2 pharmacokinetics
The detailed study of the time course of decline in h2E2 concentration in mouse plasma resolved three distinct phases. There was an initial rapid first-order decline in concentration with a half-life of 4.4 minutes (Fig. 1A). This was followed by a longer distribution phase with a half-life of 4.2 hours (Fig.1A/B). The terminal elimination phase had a half-life of 7.8 days (Fig. 1B) and the model generated a value for the Vdss of h2E2 of 0.3 L/kg (Fig 1A/B). Graphs generated by SigmaPlot curve-fitting analysis, also using an exponential decay model with three phases, provided a visually better fit for the data over the first 24 hours than did WinNonlin. This model generated a rapid distribution phase of 12.0 minutes, a longer distribution half-life of 6.0 hours, and a terminal elimination half-life of 7.8 days. Between 60 and 120 minutes after the infusion of h2E2, when the cocaethylene pharmacokinetic studies were completed, the concentration of h2E2 declined by less than 8%.
Fig. 1.
h2E2 concentrations in mouse blood as a function of time. The data is described by a three-compartment model, which estimates an initial distribution half-life of 4.4 minutes, a second distribution half-life of 4.2 hours, and an elimination half-life of 7.8 days, and a Vdss of 0.3 L/kg. Solid lines represent a model generated in WinNolin, and dashed lines represent a model generated in SigmaPlot. n=5
4.2 Plasma pharmacokinetics of cocaethylene
In control animals, cocaethylene concentrations over time were fit using a two-compartment model. This model generated a distribution half-life of 0.5 min, a terminal elimination half-life of 8.1 min and a Vdss of 2.5 L/kg (Fig. 2A). In the presence of h2E2, the initial peak concentration of cocaethylene was 13-fold higher (2940 ng/mL) than in the vehicle-treated group (235 ng/mL). No initial distribution phase was observed so a one-compartment model was applied. This model generated values for the elimination half-life of 11.1 min, and for the Vdss 0.1 L/kg (Fig. 2A). Over 60 minutes, plasma concentrations in control animals declined by approximately 99%, and by 94% in the presence of h2E2.
Fig. 2.
Plasma (A) and brain (B) concentrations of cocaethylene in mice in the presence and absence of h2E2. The regression line through the vehicle data set represents a two-compartment model while the regression line through the h2E2 data set represents a one-compartment model. In h2E2 treated animals an elimination half-life of 11.1 minutes was estimated. In control animals, a distribution half-life of 0.5 minutes and an elimination half-life of 8.1 minutes were calculated. Panel B: AUC of cocaethylene in the presence of h2E2 was 556 min∙ng/g and in control was 7162 min∙ng/g. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM from 3 mice.
4.2 Brain pharmacokinetics of cocaethylene
The increase in plasma concentrations observed in the presence of h2E2 (Fig 2A) were accompanied by a concomitant decrease in brain concentrations (Fig 2B). Brain cocaethylene concentrations in control animals were fit by a two-compartment model, while a one-compartment model provided an adequate fit in the presence of h2E2 (Fig 2B). In the presence of h2E2, the mean peak brain concentration was 179 ng/g compared with 696 ng/g in control animals and the AUC decreased from 7162 min·ng/g to 556 min·ng/g (92% decrease) in the presence of the antibody.
Discussion
This study represents one of the highest resolution pharmacokinetic analyses of a humanized monoclonal antibody in rodents and was able to resolve three distinct phases for the distribution and elimination of h2E2. Initial plasma concentrations of antibody were lower than would be expected based on the dose injected, indicating a rapid equilibration into extravascular spaces, such as the spleen, liver, and lungs. The initial rapid decline in plasma h2E2 concentrations likely represents distribution into some interstitial space fluid. This phase is completed within the first 15–30 minutes. This is followed by a slower distribution, likely representing distribution into interstitial fluid in poorly perfused tissues such as muscle etc., as is seen with many other monoclonal antibodies [12, 13]. The subsequent long terminal elimination phase was consistent with other human antibodies in rodents [14] and similar to what was previously seen with 2E2 in mice and rats [3] demonstrating that the humanization procedure did not alter the long elimination half-life seen with the mAb 2E2. This suggests that h2E2 will have long lasting effects in vivo. During the time course of the cocaethylene pharmacokinetic study, antibody concentrations declined modestly, compared with an almost complete loss of cocaethylene. This indicates that the observed decreases in cocaethylene concentrations were not due to distribution of h2E2.
The plasma pharmacokinetics of cocaethylene were dramatically altered by the antibody. It has been previously shown that infusion of human IgG had no effect on cocaine pharmacokinetics in the same strain of mice used for these studies [3]. Therefore, this control was not repeated. In the presence of h2E2 the initial rapid distribution of cocaethylene to the brain was not observed. For this reason, a one-compartment model was applied. However, cocaethylene concentrations were much lower than would be expected based on the amount injected. This indicates that substantial first pass redistribution to other tissues occurred, though clearly only a small portion distributed to the brain. It is likely that binding of cocaethylene to the antibody occurred in this extravascular interstitial fluid. Additionally, h2E2 caused a delay in the peak brain concentration of cocaethylene. This indicates an almost immediate binding of most of the cocaethylene by the antibody, which is characteristic of high affinity antibody-ligand interactions. The value for Vdss of cocaethylene in plasma was less than that of the antibody, indicating that cocaethylene was restricted to the same volume as the antibody. This is consistent with the inhibition of cocaine distribution to the brain produced by h2E2 in rats [4]. However, this model implies that the antibody did not slow the elimination of cocaethylene. This is not consistent with the reported inhibition of the elimination of nicotine in the presence of an anti-nicotine mAb [15]. It is possible that the elimination of cocaethylene is inhibited by h2E2, in which case the decline in the plasma concentration observed over the time course of this study could represent a combination of both slowed distribution and elimination. Additional studies that include a longer time course and the measurement of cocaethylene metabolites will be required to resolve these issues.
Historically, most treatments for cocaine addiction have targeted its pharmacodynamic sites of action [16]. In these cases, it was unnecessary to test for efficacy in the presence of cocaethylene, since cocaine and cocaethylene have the same site of action. However, new approaches (including enzymes, vaccines, and mAbs) target cocaine itself to alter its pharmacokinetics. Therefore it may be useful to determine whether other cocaine specific therapies, such as vaccines and other enzymes also target cocaethylene. Indeed, a bacterial cocaine esterase has been shown to target cocaethylene as well as cocaine [17]. Importantly the present report is the first study of the effectiveness of an anti-cocaine antibody on preventing the entry of cocaethylene into the brain. The ability of h2E2 to antagonize cocaethylene’s entry into the brain in mice supports its selection as a lead candidate for development as a passive immunotherapy for cocaine abusers, including those that co-abuse alcohol.
Highlights.
-
-
The anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody h2E2 sequestered cocaethylene in the plasma and prevented its entry into the brain.
-
-
This study predicts that h2E2 will retain clinical efficacy in patients who co-abuse both cocaine and alcohol.
-
-
A detailed pharmacokinetic study of the humanized anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody resolved multiple distribution phases and measured its long terminal elimination half-life.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Alexander Vinks and Dr. Tomoyuki Mizuno at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center for assistance with the pharmacokinetic analysis, Dr. Ernie Chaffin, Dr. Robert Topmiller, and Katie Gabbard from the Hamilton County Coroner’s Office, Cincinnati, OH for conducting the analytical quantification of cocaethylene concentrations. We also thank Erin Bartley and Purabi Dey for technical assistance and Felicia Gooden for technical assistance and helpful discussion. We also thank Catalent, Inc. for manufacturing the recombinant h2E2. These studies were supported by a National Institute on Drug Abuse Translational Avant-Garde Award DP1DA031386 (ABN), and a Dalton-Zannoni Undergraduate Research Fellowship from the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (HNW).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Kosten TR, Domingo CB, Shorter D, Orson F, Green C, Somoza E, et al. Vaccine for cocaine dependence: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled efficacy trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;140:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martell BA, Orson FM, Poling J, Mitchell E, Rossen RD, Gardner T, et al. Cocaine vaccine for the treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone-maintained patients: a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(10):1116–1123. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Norman AB, Tabet MR, Norman MK, Buesing WR, Pesce AJ, Ball WJ. A chimeric human/murine anticocaine monoclonal antibody inhibits the distribution of cocaine to the brain in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;320(1):145–153. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.111781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Norman AB, Gooden FCT, Tabet MR, Ball WJ. A Recombinant Humanized Anti-Cocaine Monoclonal Antibody Inhibits the Distribution of Cocaine to the Brain in Rats. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 2014;42(7):1125–1131. doi: 10.1124/dmd.114.057034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCance EF, Price LH, Kosten TR, Jatlow PI. Cocaethylene: pharmacology, physiology and behavioral effects in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274(1):215–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dean RA, Christian CD, Sample RH, Bosron WF. Human liver cocaine esterases: ethanol-mediated formation of ethylcocaine. FASEB J. 1991;5(12):2735–2739. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.5.12.1916095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Herbst ED, Harris DS, Everhart ET, Mendelson J, Jacob P, Jones RT. Cocaethylene formation following ethanol and cocaine administration by different routes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;19(2):95–104. doi: 10.1037/a0022950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jatlow P. Cocaethylene: pharmacologic activity and clinical significance. Ther Drug Monit. 1993;15(6):533–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paula S, Tabet MR, Farr CD, Norman AB, Ball WJ. Three-dimensional quantitative structureactivity relationship modeling of cocaine binding by a novel human monoclonal antibody. J Med Chem. 2004;47(1):133–142. doi: 10.1021/jm030351z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choudhri TF, Hoh BL, Solomon RA, Connolly ES, Pinsky DJ. Use of a spectrophotometric hemoglobin assay to objectively quantify intracerebral hemorrhage in mice. Stroke. 1997;28(11):2296–2302. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.11.2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bleck GT. Consistent production of genetically stable mammalian cel llines. Biopharm International. 2012;25:56–59. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang W, Wang EQ, Balthasar JP. Monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(5):548–558. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lobo ED, Hansen RJ, Balthasar JP. Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(11):2645–2668. doi: 10.1002/jps.20178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bazin-Redureau MI, Renard CB, Scherrmann JM. Pharmacokinetics of heterologous and homologous immunoglobulin G, F(ab')2 and Fab after intravenous administration in the rat. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1997;49(3):277–281. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1997.tb06795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Keyler DE, Roiko SA, Benlhabib E, LeSage MG, St Peter JV, Stewart S, et al. Monoclonal nicotinespecific antibodies reduce nicotine distribution to brain in rats: dose- and affinity-response relationships. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005;33(7):1056–1061. doi: 10.1124/dmd.105.004234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vocci F, Ling W. Medications development: successes and challenges. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;108(1):94–108. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brim RL, Noon KR, Collins GT, Nichols J, Narasimhan D, Sunahara RK, et al. The ability of bacterial cocaine esterase to hydrolyze cocaine metabolites and their simultaneous quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;80(6):1119–1127. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.074534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


