Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol. 2006 Mar 6;253(6):707–713. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0091-5

The post-syrinx syndrome: stable central myelopathy and collapsed or absent syrinx

E I Bogdanov 1,, John D Heiss 2, E G Mendelevich 3
PMCID: PMC4294185  NIHMSID: NIHMS651051  PMID: 16511636

Abstract

Among 168 cases with neurologic findings of cervicothoracic syringomyelia and MRI findings of Chiari 1 malformation and/or underdevelopment of the posterior cranial fossa, 15 patients (9.1%) had collapsed, flat syrinxes and 14 patients (8.3%) did not have syrinxes. Both groups of patients had clinical findings of central myelopathy that had been stable for at least 3 years. Magnetic resonance imaging detected atrophy of the cervical spinal cord in both groups and spontaneous communications between the syrinx and the subarachnoid space in 3 patients of the group with collapsed syrinxes. Analysis of these results and review of the literature suggest that patients with clinical signs of syringomyelia and Chiari 1 malformation or underdeveloped posterior fossa, but with small or absent syringomyelitic cavities, have the “postsyrinx” state as a result of spontaneous collapse of distended syrinxes.

Keywords: syringomyelia, Arnold-Chiari malformation, skull base, spinal cord diseases

Introduction

Syringomyelia associated with CM1 presents clinically as a slowly progressive central cervical myelopathy distinct from other myelopathies and polyneuropathies. MRI of the spine confirms the diagnosis of syringomyelia. However, MRI does not confirm the presence of a syrinx or of other syringomyelia-like diseases in some patients with CM1, despite neurologic findings that suggest syringomyelia. For example, Elster et al.[11] did not find syrinxes in 2 of 25 patients with CM1 and central myelopathy, Tanghe [53] in 4 of 19, and Milhorat et al. [37] in 83 of 126. The segmental signs and symptoms of central cord syndrome in these patients were unlike the signs and symptoms produced by long tract lesions at the cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) level. In addition, the central cord syndrome was not a product of the “presyrinx” state, because swelling and edema of the spinal cord were not present on MRI studies [13, 28]. To elucidate the causes and mechanisms of central cord syndrome in patients without syrinxes, we compared clinical and MRI evaluations of patients with CM1 without syringomyelia to those of patients with CM1 with collapsed syrinxes.

Patients and methods

From 1997 to 2001, 168 patients were examined in our hospital with clinical signs and symptoms of syringomyelia associated with CM1 and/or underdevelopment of the PF; other diseases with similar manifestations were excluded. Specifically, at examination we excluded diseases that mimic syringomyelia: 1) adult form of occult spinal dysraphism and tethered cord syndrome, 2) cervical spinal canal stenosis, 3) spondylosis and cervical disc herniations, 4) post-traumatic central cord syndrome, 5) Tangier disease and 6) other myelo- and polyneuropathies. All examined patients were rural tenants of the Republic of Tatarstan in the Russian Federation where syringomyelia is very common, 130:100,000 inhabitants [8, 49]. Syringomyelia predominates in males and in those from isolated areas [8, 18, 47, 49].

Patients underwent one or more MRI scans of the brain and the cervical and thoracic spinal cord. Imaging was performed on the 1.0-T General Electric Signa Horison or the 0.28-T Bruker with SGI workstation. Standard T1 and T2 weighted images were taken in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. The ‘hydrography’ technique of long-echo RARE sequence was also used to show syrinx cavities in three planes. The widest anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord at the C4 and C7 cervical levels was measured [48]. Measurements of CSF spaces, bony structures, and angles at CVJ and PF levels were performed in accordance with previous recommendations [16,37,40] and are listed in the Table.

Table.

Clinical and MRI findings in patients with CM1 and clinical signs and symptoms of cervico-thoracic syringomyelia. On recent MRI studies, Group A patients do not have syrinxes and Group B patients have narrow syrinx cavities

Group
Patient number
A
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Age 55 48 27 61 37 43 42 52 45 51 45 57 19 47 50 64 64 75 42 47 41 47 45 45 48 63 46 46 60
Age at symptom onset 47 28 20 48 30 22 12 32 12 29 10 20 11 17 21 24 44 30 12 31 37 17 11 17 21 16 14 18 39
Segmental signs:
 dysesthetic pain + + + + + + + + + + + + + p < 0.017
 sensory loss + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 trophic disturbance + + + + + + + + + + + +
 muscular atrophy + + + + + + + + + +
 weakness + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Long tracts signs
 pyramidal signs + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + p < 0.036
 impaired position sense + + + + + + +
FM level signs
 suboccipital headache + +
 nystagmus + + + + + + +
 ataxia + + + + + + + + +
 dizziness/vertigo + + + + + + + +
 impaired CN IX, X + + + + +
Scoliosis/kyphosis + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MRI features
 cerebellar cisterns
  obliterated + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
  small + + + + +
 tonsillar herniation (mm) 5
 basilar invagination + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 Cervicomedullary kinking + + + + +
 short supraocciput + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 short clivus + + + + + + + + +
 Boogard’s angle increased + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + p < 0.001
 platybasia + + + + + + + + + + +
 Obliterated CSF space
  Ventral Foramen magnum + + + + + + + + + + + p < 0.014
  Dorsal Foramen magnum + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + p < 0.016
 Spinal cord AP diameter (mm) 6.5 11 12 10 11 9 6 8.5 10 6 11 8.5 7 10 8.5 6 6 7.5 7 9.5 6.5 8 10 9.5 9 8 7.5 9.5 15
 Syrinx AP diameter (mm) 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 4 1 3 2 4 1 3
 Spontaneous syrinx drainage + + +

Fourteen patients (8.3%) with CM1 did not have syrinxes on their MRI scans and formed Group A. Group A consisted of 2 females and 12 males, age 19 to 61 (mean 44.9) years, who had symptomatic clinical syringomyelia associated with CM1 or underdeveloped PF for 8 to 35 years (mean 21.8) (Table, Fig. B, C, E, G). Fifteen patients (8.9%) with CM1 had flat, spontaneously-collapsed syringomyelitic cavities and formed Group B. Group B was comprised of 5 females and 10 males, age 42 to 75 (mean 52.2) years, with symptomatic syringomyelia for 4 to 47 (mean 28.7) years, who had clear MRI signs of flat, spontaneously-collapsed syringomyelitic cavities [5] (Fig. F, H–K). Syrinxes had cervical or cervico-thoracic localization, were 3–10 spinal segments in length, but did not communicate with the fourth ventricle. Three patients of Group B had spontaneous syringo-subarachnoidal communications visible on MRI images in the axial plane [4]. Patients in both groups had normal or slightly limited functional activity and had no history of disease progression for at least the previous three years. Spinal cord atrophy was defined as an AP diameter of the spinal cord of less than 8 mm (Table, Fig. G–K) [48]. Fisher exact test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Fig.

Fig

In patients with clinical signs of syringomyelia, midsagittal and axial MR images of the cervical spinal cord demonstrated some patients without radiographic evidence of syringomyelia (B, C, E, F, G), (Group A) and some with small, collapsed syrinxes (H–N), (Group B). Patient A-7 (F, G) has spinal cord atrophy and a small central canal. Patient A-13 had a large syrinx (A, D) and tonsillar ectopia (D), which extended below the C1 level on an initial scan; 8 years later the syrinx had resolved (B, C, E) and the cerebellar tonsils (B, E) had ascended. Patients B-2 (H–K) and B-5 (N) have spinal cord atrophy and collapsed syrinxes

Results

Results are presented in the Table and Figure. Patients in groups A and B did not differ significantly in terms of mean age and duration of the symptomatic stage of disease. Males predominated in both groups. Patients in both groups had clinical findings typical for syringomyelia associated with CM1 and/or underdeveloped PF, with neurological deficits generally being more severe in patients of group B (Table). Segmental and long tract lesions at the cervical spinal cord level, trophic disturbances, and kyphoscoliosis were frequent clinical findings. MRI features were those of CM1 and/or under-development of the PF (Table). Dysesthetic pain, pyramidal signs, increased Boogard’s angle, and narrow anterior and posterior CSF spaces at the FM level were more frequent in patients of group B (Table). The mean anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord did not differ significantly between groups. 4 patients of group A [1,7,10,13] and 6 patients of group B [25,7,13] had cervical spinal cord atrophy (Table, Fig. F–K) [48]. A common factor in both groups was a narrow or obliterated cerebellomedullary cistern. MRI scans separated by an 8 year period in Patient A-13 indicated that in this interval a large diameter syrinx (Fig. D) resolved (Fig. C, E) and the cerebellar ectopia (Fig. A) lessened (Fig. B).

Discussion

Syringomyelia is a polyetiologic disorder characterized by intramedullary tubular cyst formation and progression. One current classification distinguishes four types of syringomyelia [38]. In most cases, syringomyelia is a secondary event affecting the spinal cord due to a distant cause [10]. The most frequent cause of syringomyelia development is the Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) [14]. Primary CM1 is created when an underdeveloped posterior cranial fossa (PF) with decreased volume cannot accommodate the normally developed hindbrain [3, 37, 40]. It is characterized by compression of cerebellar cisterns, herniation of the cerebellar tonsils, decreased PF volume, and varying degrees of dysplasia of the posterior aspect of the skull base [37]. Because patients with a small posterior fossa, but without herniation of the cerebellar tonsils, can present with syringomyelia identical to that seen in patients with CM1, it has been suggested that this state be denoted as the Chiari 0 malformation (CM0) [55]. Other skull base abnormalities (basilar invagination, platybasia, and short clivus) are also associated with a small posterior fossa [24, 50]. Familial aggregation of CM1 and CM0 cases suggests that there is a genetic predisposition for developing the malformation [37, 50]. It is hypothesized that a gene(s) mutation prevents normal growth of the bones of the skull base and reduces the volume of the posterior fossa enough to compress the cerebellum and displace the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum [50]. The likelihood of syringomyelia is related to the severity of the morphological abnormalities expressed in patients with CM1 or CM0. External factors also contribute to the development of syringomyelia. For example, syringomyelia is more prevalent in those with occupations that require strenuous physical exertion [8,18,47,49]. In fact, as the number of workers engaged in occupations that required heavy labor decreased in Western European countries between 1940 and 1980, the incidence of syringomyelia decreased proportionally [18, 47].

Although the pathogenesis of CM1-associated syringomyelia is not completely understood, abnormal CSF flow at the foramen magnum (FM) and upper cervical spinal canal appears to influence the creation and progression of syrinxes [9, 16, 20, 43, 45]. Several patho-physiological factors are proposed to promote syringomyelia development: 1) reduction of subarachnoid compliance and accentuated pulse pressure in the cervical portion of the spinal subarachnoid space [16, 43], 2) increased intrasyrinx pressure [36], 3) pressure gradients within the intramedullary extracellular fluid [23], 4) intrasyrinx fluid pulsation [9], 5) pulsation of the intramedullary arteries [51], and 6) patency of the central canal of the spinal cord [33]. However, because communication between the syrinx and fourth ventricle is usually not found in radiographic or post-mortem studies, it cannot play a role in pathogenesis of most cases of syringomyelia [34, 43, 45].

According to Oldfield et al. [43], the movement of the herniated cerebellar tonsils acts as a piston to create enlarged systolic CSF pressure waves that act on the surface of the spinal cord and propel the passage of CSF into the spinal cord through the perivascular spaces. The same mechanism of syrinx formation and development is proposed for syringomyelia associated with CM0 [55]. Before the syrinx is visible on MR images, longitudinal intramedullary edema and swelling associated with clinical manifestations of syringomyelia denote the “presyrinx” state in CM1 patients [13, 28]. In general, neurologic deficits progress rapidly in the initial period of spinal cord “presyrinx” edema and syrinx formation. We previously compared the rate of disease progression in 21 patients with distended syrinxes (mean diameter 8.8 mm) with that in 50 patients with smaller syrinxes (mean diameter 4.7 mm). Disease progression was more rapid in patients with larger syrinxes [5]. However, neurologic function stabilizes later in about one-third to one-half of patients with syringomyelia for 10 or more years [1, 6, 7, 17, 29] and shrinkage of cavities may be encountered [5]. Despite these general rules, the prognosis for progression of myelopathy is uncertain in individual patients. The dimensions of the syrinx and remaining spinal cord are not strongly related to clinical findings [30] and some patients with large, distended cavities are asymptomatic for many years [42]. However, once myelopathy develops it is largely irreversible and it improves modestly, if at all, even if the syrinx is eliminated [25, 43, 54]. Factors other than syrinx diameter, such as intra- and extrasyrinx fluid pressures [16, 36] and gliosis around the cavity, may play a role in the development of myelopathy.

There are several reports of cases in which syringomyelia symptoms resolve spontaneously or fail to progress [1, 6, 7, 17, 29]. In a nationwide epidemiological survey in Japan [39], among 1,243 patients with syringomyelia, one-half of them with CM1, 39 patients (2.3%) had spontaneous resolution of symptoms and 202 patients (16.2%) had a stable course of disease. Our retrospective analysis of 103 unoperated cases of syringomyelia associated with CM1 and/or underdeveloped PF, with duration of disease from 1 to 46 years, revealed that syrinx diameter decreases at a late stage in the disease [5]. In the literature there are descriptions of 39 single cases [27] in which spontaneous radiological resolution of syringomyelia occurred in children and adults, with or without clinical restoration [2, 25, 26, 44, 46, 52, 54]. In some of these cases the collapse of the syrinx was associated with spontaneous upward displacement of the cerebellar tonsils [2, 25, 26, 44, 46, 52]. With time, the syrinx may become smaller [2,54] or disappear completely [22, 26, 54], and may be accompanied by spinal cord atrophy, as in the case of an 84-year-old patient with CM1 who was left with spinal cord atrophy and a narrow syrinx cavity after spontaneous resolution of holocord syringomyelia [12].

Spontaneous resolution of the syrinx has also been seen in the pediatric age group. Clinical and MRI examinations were performed serially over many years in 27 children and adolescents with scoliosis and syringomyelia; the syrinx resolved spontaneously and completely in 9 and was reduced in size in another 5 of them [54]. The authors attributed this phenomenon to growth of the PF bones and normalization of CSF dynamics at the FM level [54]. That report supports earlier work that showed that with increasing age the volume of the PF volume increases [3] and the cerebellar tonsils ascend [32], as occurred in Patient A-13 (Fig. A, B). Spontaneous syrinx collapse can also result from spontaneous rupture of an arachnoid membrane at the foramen magnum, which opens the CSF pathways, or from spontaneous syringo-subarachnoid drainage [4]. The neurologic improvement or stabilization that follows spontaneous collapse of the syrinx is similar to that seen after surgical procedures that collapse the syrinx [19, 21].

The reports in the literature of children and adults who have had complete resolution of their syringomyelitic cavities support our contention that patients in group A had syringomyelia in the past. The time course of the disease (Table) and the radiographic findings (Fig. B, C, E, F, G) in group A also suggests that this is the case. In patients with scoliosis and kyphosis, syringomyelia probably arose in childhood (for example, patients A-7, A-9, A-13 in the Table). In patients in other series who undergo surgical treatment, the prognosis for improvement decreases as the duration of syringomyelia before surgery increases [41]. Irreversible injury to the spinal cord from chronically increased intra- and extramedullary pressure [16, 36] and from gliosis around the syrinx cavities [34] prevents clinical restoration when the syrinx collapses spontaneously or from surgery. It is unknown if gliosis can progress after resolution of the syrinx filling mechanism and collapse of the syrinx cavity.

Clinical findings in patients without syrinxes (Group A) were identical to those in patients with spontaneously collapsed cavities (Group B, Table) and were typical for syringomyelia associated with CM1 and/or underdeveloped PF. The persistence of dysesthetic pain (especially in group B) was characteristic for patients with collapse of their syrinxes [35]. Patients of both groups had similar bony and CSF space abnormalities at the CVJ and PF (Table) [16, 43, 45]. Syrinxes in some patients of group B were very narrow (Fig. F, H–K) and complete obliteration of these cavities might be observed in future MR scans. Some patients in both groups had prominent atrophy of the cervical spinal cord (Table, Fig. F–K), which resulted from loss of spinal cord substance before the syrinx cavity collapsed.

CSF flow disturbances at the CVJ and PF that promote the development of syringomyelia can spontaneously revert to a normal state that resolves the syrinx, such as in Case A-13, in which a syrinx that was seen 8 years before by MRI resolved spontaneously and completely on follow-up examination (Fig. A–E). Incomplete disappearance of the syrinx in patients of group B may have resulted because the ventral and dorsal CSF spaces at the FM level were smaller in this group than in group A (Table).

On magnetic resonance imaging, an eccentric part of a syrinx may appear to approach or communicate with the spinal subarachnoid space [4] (Fig. L, M). Postmortem examination of the spinal cord of patients with syringomyelia associated with CM1 often demonstrates fissures in the spinal cord that connect the subarachnoid space with syrinx cavities that extend into the dorsolateral part of the spinal cord [34]. Syrinx fluid can drain into the subarachnoid space through these channels.

The symptoms of clinical syringomyelia in patients of group A are best explained by residual central myelopathy that persists after spontaneous resolution of syringomyelia. Other mechanisms were considered that did not require a syrinx as an intermediate condition for central cervical myelopathy. Specifically, cervical spinal stenosis was excluded. In addition, the “presyrinx” state, which may result in signs and symptoms that mimic syringomyelia, was not present because there were no MRI features of intramedullary edema and swelling, the disease was of long duration, and symptoms were stable for many years [13, 28]. Non-cystic myelopathy did not result from the chronic effect of pulsatile traction on the spinal cord [20] because this mechanism is applicable primarily to type II CM, tethered cord, and spina bifida [31]. In addition, focal traction on the spinal cord is unlikely to produce stable central spinal cord syndrome with widespread segmental signs. A final potential mechanism, that the myelopathy arose from basilar impression alone (Table), is not in keeping with previous observations that basilar impression 1) is not manifested by segmental lesions, 2) has distinctive clinical characteristics [15], and 3) does not cause syringomyelia unless it is associated with CM1. These mechanisms can certainly be excluded in patient A-13.

Our present and previous [4, 5] studies and review of the literature lead us to conclude that clinical signs and symptoms of syringomyelia in patients with visualized CM1 and/or underdeveloped PF, but without visible syringomyelitic cavities, result from syrinxes that have resolved spontaneously after spontaneous normalization of CSF dynamics at the CVJ level or drainage of the syrinx through syringosubarachnoid communications. This state can be denoted as the “post-syrinx” state and is one possible course in the natural history of syringomyelia associated with CM1 and/or underdeveloped PF. The post-syrinx state is characterized by 1) stable symptoms and signs of central myelopathy, 2) MRI evidence of Chiari I or Chiari 0 malformation and absent or collapsed syrinx, and 3) absence of other diseases that mimic syringomyelia. We hope that elaboration of this syndrome will be helpful in the clinical management of these patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Pauline Monro for reviewing the manuscript carefully and medical student Shamil Bogdanov for technical assistance.

Contributor Information

E. I. Bogdanov, Email: enver_bogdanov@mail.ru, Dept. of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Kazan State Medical University, Butlerov str. 49, Kazan, Russia 420012, Tel.: +7-8432/353308, Fax: +7-8432/360693.

John D. Heiss, Email: heissj@ninds.nih.gov, Surgical Neurology Branchk, National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1414, USA, Tel.: +1-301/594-8112, Fax: +1-301/402-0380.

E. G. Mendelevich, Dept. of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Kazan State Medical University, Butlerov str. 49, Kazan, Russia 420012, Tel.: +7-8432/353308, Fax: +7-8432/360693.

References

  • 1.Anderson NE, Willoughby EW, Wrightson P. The natural history of syringomyelia. Clin Exp Neurol. 1986;22:71–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Avellino AM, Britz GW, McDowell JR, Shaw DW, Ellenbogen RG, Roberts TS. Spontaneous resolution of a cervicothoracic syrinx in a child. Case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;30:43–46. doi: 10.1159/000028760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Badie B, Mendoza D, Batzdorf U. Posterior fossa volume and response to suboccipital decompression in patients with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:214–218. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199508000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bogdanov EI, Ibatullin MM, Mendelevich EG. Spontaneous drainage in syringomyelia: magnetic resonance imaging findings. Neuroradiology. 2000;42:676–678. doi: 10.1007/s002340000358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bogdanov EI, Mendelevich EG. Syrinx size and duration of symptoms predict the pace of progressive myelopathy: retrospective analysis of 103 unoperated cases with craniocervical junction malformations and syringomyelia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2002;104:90–97. doi: 10.1016/s0303-8467(01)00189-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boiardi A, Munari L, Silvani A, Porta E, Scuratti A, Lodrini S. Natural history and postsurgical outcome of syringomyelia. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1991;12:575–579. doi: 10.1007/BF02336954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boman K, Iivanainen M. Prognosis of syringomyelia. Acta Neurol Scand. 1967;43:61–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1967.tb05718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Borisova NA, Valikova IV, Kutchaeva GA. Syringomyelia (in Russian) Meditcina; Moscow: 1989. pp. 5–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brugieres P, Idy-Peretti I, Iffenecker C, Parker F, Jolivet O, Hurth M, Gaston A, Bittoun J. CSF flow measurement in syringomyelia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1785–1792. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Catala M. Neuroembryologic considerations on the so-called malformative syringomyelia. Neurochirurgie. 1999;45(Suppl 1):9–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Elster AD, Chen MY. Chiari I malformations: clinical and radiologic reappraisal. Radiology. 1992;183:347–353. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.2.1561334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Finsterer J, Lubec D, Samec P. Generalised spinal cord atrophy, Chiari-I malformation, and syringomyelia. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:184–188. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fischbein NJ, Dillon WP, Cobbs C, Weinstein PR. The “presyrinx” state: a reversible myelopathic condition that may precede syringomyelia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:7–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gardner WJ, Angel J. The mechanism of syringomyelia and its surgical correction. Clin Neurosurg. 1959;6:131–140. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/6.cn_suppl_1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goel A, Bhatjiwale M, Desai K. Basilar invagination: a study based on 190 surgically treated patients. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:962–968. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.0962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heiss JD, Patronas N, DeVroom HL, Shawker T, Ennis R, Kammerer W, Eidsath A, Talbot T, Morris J, Eskioglu E, Oldfield EH. Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:553–562. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.4.0553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hertel G, Kramer S, Placzek E. Syringomyelia, Clinical follow-up studies in 323 patients. Nervenarzt. 1973;44:1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hertel G, Ricker K. A geomedical study on the distribution of syringomyelia in Germany. In: den Hartog Jager WA, editor. Neurology. Vol. 434. Excerpta Medica; Amsterdam: 1978. pp. 353–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hida K, Iwasaki Y. Syringosub-arachoid shunt for syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;11:Article 7. doi: 10.3171/foc.2001.11.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hofmann E, Warmuth-Metz M, Bendszus M, Solymosi L. Phase-contrast MR imaging of the cervical CSF and spinal cord: volumetric motion analysis in patients with Chiari I malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:151–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iskandar BJ, Hedlund GL, Grabb PA, Oakes WJ. The resolution of syringohydromyelia without hindbrain herniation after posterior fossa decompression. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:212–216. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jack CR, Jr, Kokmen E, Onofrio BM. Spontaneous decompression of syringomyelia: magnetic resonance imaging findings. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1991;74:283–286. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.74.2.0283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Josephson A, Greitz D, Klason T, Olson L, Spenger C. A spinal thecal sac constriction model supports the theory that induced pressure gradients in the cord cause edema and cyst formation. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:636–645. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00039. discussion 645–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Karagoz F, Izgi N, Kapijcijoglu Sencer S. Morphometric measurements of the cranium in patients with Chiari type I malformation and comparison with the normal population. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:165–171. doi: 10.1007/s007010200020. discussion 171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kastrup A, Nagele T, Topka H. Spontaneous resolution of idiopathic syringomyelia. Neurology. 2001;57:1519–1520. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1519-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klekamp J, Iaconetta G, Samii M. Spontaneous resolution of Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:664–667. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kyoshima K, Bogdanov EI. Spontaneous resolution of syringomyelia: report of two cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:762–768. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000079629.05048.a2. discussion 768–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levy EI, Heiss JD, Kent MS, Riedel CJ, Oldfield EH. Spinal cord swelling preceding syrinx development. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2000;92:93–97. doi: 10.3171/spi.2000.92.1.0093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mariani C, Cislaghi MG, Barbieri S, Filizzolo F, Di Palma F, Farina E, D’Aliberti G, Scarlato G. The natural history and results of surgery in 50 cases of syringomyelia. J Neurol. 1991;238:433–438. doi: 10.1007/BF00314649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Masur H, Oberwittler C, Reuther G, Heyen P. Cerebellar herniation in syringomyelia: relation between tonsillar herniation and the dimensions of the syrinx and the remaining spinal cord. A quantitative MRI study. Eur Neurol. 1995;35:162–167. doi: 10.1159/000117114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meadows J, Guarnieri M, Haroun R, Kraut M, Carson B. Type I Chiari malformation: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Quart. 2001;11:220–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mikulis DJ, Diaz O, Egglin TK, Sanchez R. Variance of the position of the cerebellar tonsils with age: preliminary report. Radiology. 1992;183:725–728. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Milhorat TH, Nobandegani F, Miller JI, Rao C. Noncommunicating syringomyelia following occlusion of central canal in rats. Experimental model and histological findings. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:274–279. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Milhorat TH, Capocelli AL, Jr, Anzil AP, Kotzen RM, Milhorat RH. Pathological basis of spinal cord cavitation in syringomyelia: analysis of 105 autopsy cases. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:802–812. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Milhorat TH, Kotzen RM, Mu HT, Capocelli AL, Jr, Milhorat RH. Dysesthetic pain in patients with syringomyelia. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:940–946. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00017. discussion 946–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Milhorat TH, Capocelli AL, Jr, Kotzen RM, Bolognese P, Heger IM, Cottrell JE. Intramedullary pressure in syringomyelia: clinical and pathophysiological correlates of syrinx distension. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:1102–1110. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199711000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM, Kula RW, Mandell M, Wolpert C, Speer MC. Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:1005–1017. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199905000-00042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Milhorat TH. Classification of syringomyelia. Neurosurg Focus. 2000;8:Article 1. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.3.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Moriwaka F, Tashiro K, Tachibana S, Yada K. Epidemiology of syringomyelia in Japan–the nationwide survey. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1995;35:1395–1397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nishikawa M, Sakamoto H, Hakuba A, Nakanishi N, Inoue Y. Pathogenesis of Chiari malformation: a morphometric study of the posterior cranial fossa. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:40–47. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nishikawa M, Sakamoto H, Kitano S, Hakuba A, Nakanishi N. A clinical study on long-term outcome in patients with syringomyelia associated with Chiari malformation. No To Shinkei. 1999;51:318–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nishizawa S, Yokoyama T, Yokota N, Tokuyama T, Ohta S. Incidentally identified syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformations: is early interventional surgery necessary? Neurosurgery. 2001;49:637–640. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200109000-00018. discussion 640–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oldfield EH, Muraszko K, Shawker TH, Patronas NJ. Pathophysiology of syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation of the cerebellar tonsils. Implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:3–15. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pierallini A, Ferone E, Colonnese C. Magnetic resonance imaging of a case of spontaneous resolution of syringomyelia associated with type I Chiari malformation. Radiol Med (Torino) 1997;93:621–622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pinna G, Alessandrini F, Alfieri A, Rossi M, Bricolo A. Cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics study in Chiari I malformation: implication for syrinx formation. Neurosurg Focus. 2000;8:Article 3. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.3.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Santoro A, Delfini R, Innocenzi G, Di Biasi C, Transimeni G, Gualdi G. Spontaneous drainage of syringomyelia. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1993;79:132–134. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.79.1.0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schergna E, Armani M. Catamnestic findings in syringomyelia in the province of Padua. Minerva Med. 1985;76:1699–1704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sherman JL, Nassaux PY, Citrin CM. Measurements of the normal cervical spinal cord on MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11:369–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sirotkin VM. Regional peculiarities of syringomyelia (in Russian) Genetica. 1970;6:166–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Speer MC, George TM, Enterline DS, Franklin A, Wolpert CM, Milhorat TH. A genetic hypothesis for Chiari I malformation with or without syringomyelia. Neurosurg Focus. 2000;8:Article 12. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.3.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stoodley MA, Jones NR, Yang L, Brown CJ. Mechanisms underlying the formation and enlargement of non-communicating syringomyelia: experimental studies. Neurosurg Focus. 2000;8:Article 2. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.3.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sudo K, Tashiro K, Miyasaka K. Features of spontaneous improvement in syringomyelia with low-situated cerebellar tonsils. Acta Neurol Belg. 1998;98:342–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tanghe HL. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in syringomyelia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;134:93–99. doi: 10.1007/BF01428512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tokunaga M, Minami S, Isobe K, Moriya H, Kitahara H, Nakata Y. Natural history of scoliosis in children with syringomyelia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:371–376. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.11021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tubbs RS, Elton S, Grabb P, Dockery SE, Bartolucci AA, Oakes WJ. Analysis of the posterior fossa in children with the Chiari 0 malformation. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:1050–1054. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200105000-00016. discussion 1054–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES