Background: Cholesterol is ubiquitous on earth. Little is known about anoxic cholesterol catabolism.
Results: We proposed a model for cholesterol uptake and subcellular compartmentation during cholesterol catabolism by a Gram-negative bacterium.
Conclusion: The enzymes located in the periplasm are critical for cholesterol catabolism, especially during the steps of substrate activation.
Significance: This study may have potential applications in the biotechnological production of steroid drugs.
Keywords: Bacterial Metabolism, Cholesterol, Cholesterol Metabolism, Gram-negative Bacteria, Metabolomics, Steroid Hormone, Subcellular Fractionation
Abstract
Cholesterol catabolism by actinobacteria has been extensively studied. In contrast, the uptake and catabolism of cholesterol by Gram-negative species are poorly understood. Here, we investigated microbial cholesterol catabolism at the subcellular level. 13C metabolomic analysis revealed that anaerobically grown Sterolibacterium denitrificans, a β-proteobacterium, adopts an oxygenase-independent pathway to degrade cholesterol. S. denitrificans cells did not produce biosurfactants upon growth on cholesterol and exhibited high cell surface hydrophobicity. Moreover, S. denitrificans did not produce extracellular catabolic enzymes to transform cholesterol. Accordingly, S. denitrificans accessed cholesterol by direction adhesion. Cholesterol is imported through the outer membrane via a putative FadL-like transport system, which is induced by neutral sterols. The outer membrane steroid transporter is able to selectively import various C27 sterols into the periplasm. S. denitrificans spheroplasts exhibited a significantly higher efficiency in cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid uptake than in cholesterol uptake. We separated S. denitrificans proteins into four fractions, namely the outer membrane, periplasm, inner membrane, and cytoplasm, and we observed the individual catabolic reactions within them. Our data indicated that, in the periplasm, various periplasmic and peripheral membrane enzymes transform cholesterol into cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid. The C27 acidic steroid is then transported into the cytoplasm, in which side-chain degradation and the subsequent sterane cleavage occur. This study sheds light into microbial cholesterol metabolism under anoxic conditions.
Introduction
Cholesterol is an essential structural component of eukaryotic membranes that maintains membrane permeability and fluidity. In addition to free membrane-embedded molecules, cholesterol is converted by animals to a storage form by esterification with long-chain fatty acids (1). Because of the ubiquity of cholesterol in eukaryotes, various pathogenic bacteria have evolved to produce and excrete cholesterol-dependent cytolysins to avoid phagocytosis by immune cells during infection (2) or to evade eukaryotic predation (3). In addition, an increasing number of reports have indicated that microbial steroid catabolism can modulate or interfere with eukaryotic signaling (4). Cholesterol is a feasible carbon and energy source for many aerobic bacteria. Cholesterol and related sterols (e.g. phytosterols and ergosterol) are released in large quantities by eukaryotic excretion and decomposition, and their complete degradation is relevant to the global carbon cycle (5). Cholesterol-degrading microorganisms have been used for biotechnological purposes such as the industrial production of steroid drugs from inexpensive cholesterol (6, 7). Ongoing research is focused on discovering new pharmaceutically useful steroids.
Bacteria have developed numerous mechanisms for importing, transforming, and degrading cholesterol (8–10). Most current knowledge on cholesterol catabolism is based on studies of Gram-positive actinobacteria (8, 11). Identification of a large regulon of cholesterol catabolic genes suggested that the utilization of host sterols is crucial for infection and persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages (12). Recent progress in the investigation of the cholesterol catabolic reactions of M. tuberculosis indicated that cholesterol catabolism can be used as a therapeutic target in this human pathogen (13). Researchers have explored the cholesterol uptake of M. tuberculosis within the host cell extensively and identified an ATP-binding cassette-like cholesterol transport system, mce4, in M. tuberculosis (11, 14, 15). Moreover, analyses of genome sequences have indicated that diverse actinobacteria, including pathogens and free-living species, harbor mce loci (15, 16).
By contrast, steroid uptake systems adopted by Gram-negative bacteria (mainly proteobacteria) remain poorly understood. The additional presence of an outer membrane (OM)4 and periplasmic space complicates steroid uptake and catabolism in proteobacteria. The lipopolysaccharide leaflet on the outer surface of OM impedes steroids from passively diffusing through the OM bilayer (17). In addition, the void of ATP in the periplasmic space (18) excludes the possibility that a mce4-similar transporter functions in the proteobacteria OM. Over the previous 2 decades, microbiologists have gradually gained a greater understanding of how hydrophobic molecules pass through the OM of Gram-negative bacteria (19–23). In addition to general porins, two families of substrate-specific OM transporters, TonB-dependent outer membrane receptors (TBDRs) and long-chain fatty acid transporters (FadL family), have been examined in detail (23–25).
The subcellular localization of individual steroid catabolic enzymes in Gram-negative bacteria is poorly understood. The periplasm constitutes up to 40% of the total cell volume in Gram-negative species (26). However, with the exception of a few studies (27, 28), past research has overlooked the periplasmic proteins involved in hydrocarbon metabolism. Some cholesterol-transforming enzymes (e.g. FAD-containing cholesterol oxidase) are extracellular (29), implying that cholesterol can be transformed into other steroids before being imported by bacterial cells.
Sterolibacterium denitrificans DSMZ 13999 can degrade cholesterol under both oxic and anoxic conditions (30, 31). Recently, we examined the cholesterol catabolic pathway in aerobically grown S. denitrificans (10). In this study, we demonstrated that an oxygenase-independent pathway functions in the denitrifying S. denitrificans cells. In addition, we investigated biosurfactant production and cell surface hydrophobicity to understand the substrate uptake mechanism. The import of cholesterol and its catabolic intermediates across the outer and cytoplasmic membranes of S. denitrificans were addressed. We then studied the subcellular localization of cholesterol catabolic enzymes. Based on these data, for the first time, we delineated the subcellular compartmentation of anoxic cholesterol catabolism in a Gram-negative bacterium. Considering that this anoxic cholesterol catabolic pathway involves novel steroid intermediates and uncharacterized enzymes, our study may have potential applications in the biotechnological production of steroid drugs.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Chemicals and Bacterial Strains
25-Hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one, 1-testosterone, androst-1-en-3,17-dione, 17-hydroxy-1-oxo-2,3-seco-androstan-3-oic acid (2,3-SAOA), and 1,17-dioxo-2,3-seco-androstan-3-oic acid were produced according to previously determined methods (10, 32, 33). 26-Hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one (also named 27-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, 99%) and cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid (also named 3-oxo-4-cholestenoic acid, 99%) were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids, and cholest-4-en-3-one-24-oic acid (also named 4-cholenic acid-3-one) and pregn-4-en-3-one-20-carboxylic acid (also named 4-pregnen-3-one-20β-carboxylic acid) were purchased from Steraloids. Cholesterol, [4C-13C]cholesterol (99 atom % 13C), cholest-4-en-3-one, cholesta-1,4-diene-3-one, androst-4-en-3,17-dione (AD), and androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione (ADD) were obtained from Sigma. S. denitrificans Chol-1ST (DSMZ 13999) was purchased from the Deutsche Sammlung für Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig, Germany). Agrobacterium tumefaciens ATCC 33970, Escherichia coli ATCC 23815, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA).
Denitrifying Growth of S. denitrificans with [4C-13C]Cholesterol
A denitrifying S. denitrificans culture (500 ml) was grown with 2 mm unlabeled cholesterol in a procedure described in a previous report (33). The residual cholesterol in the culture was quantified using the o-phthalaldehyde method (34). After the consumption of cholesterol, 20 ml of the log phase culture was transferred to a sterile 25-ml glass bottle sealed with a rubber stopper. The S. denitrificans cells were subsequently fed with 1 mm [4C-13C]cholesterol and anaerobically incubated at 28 °C with stirring (120 rpm). Samples (0.5 ml) were withdrawn every 2 h (0–24 h). The culture samples were acidified to pH <2 and extracted three times using the same volume of ethyl acetate to recover 13C-labeled intermediates. The ethyl acetate fractions were combined; the solvent was evaporated, and the residue was re-dissolved in 100 μl of 2-propanol. The catabolic intermediates were identified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS).
Measurement of Surface Activity
The denitrifying S. denitrificans cells were grown on cholesterol. Culture samples were retrieved during exponential growth to detect biosurfactant production in the culture broth and the cell-free culture supernatant. The cell-free supernatant was obtained by performing centrifugation twice (room temperature, 10,000 × g for 10 min). Culture samples were tested using the oil displacement and emulsification index (with kerosene) assays described in previous research (35, 36). Surface tension was measured using a Kruss K100MK3 tensiometer (Kruss, Germany) equipped with a platinum plate by applying the Wilhelmy plate method. The instrument was calibrated by adjusting the measurement so that the surface tension of water was 72 millinewtons/m at room temperature. The experiment was repeated three times and the results are presented as means ± S.E.
Bacterial Adhesion to Hydrocarbons Assay
The surface hydrophobicity of the S. denitrificans and P. aeruginosa cells was tested using the bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons assay (BATH) described in a previous report (37). S. denitrificans (100 ml) was anaerobically grown with 2.5 mm cholesterol or 4 mm palmitate, and P. aeruginosa was aerobically grown in rich medium (100 ml) containing 15 g/liter tryptone, 5 g/liter soytone, and 5 g/liter NaCl (pH 7.3). Exponentially growing cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed twice with 0.1 m K+-phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 5 mm MgCl2. The washed cell pellets were resuspended in the same buffer, and the cell suspensions were adjusted to an absorbance at 600 nm (A600) of 1.0 (optical path 1 cm). Aliquots (2 ml) of the cell suspensions were mixed with 0.5 ml of n-hexadecane. The mixtures were vortexed for 2 min and set aside to rest for 20 min to allow for phase separation. The surface hydrophobicity of the bacterial cells was calculated as the percentage of the cells that adhered to the hexadecane phase (37).
Detection of Cholesterol Dehydrogenase Activity in the Crude Cell Extract and Cell-free Medium
In a fed-batch culture (1 liter), S. denitrificans was anaerobically grown with 2.5 mm cholesterol. After the bacterial cells consumed 2.2 mm cholesterol, they were harvested by centrifugation. The remaining cells were removed from the medium using filtration (0.22 μm nitrocellulose membrane, 47 mm diameter, Millipore). Cell pellets (2.4 g) were resuspended in 20 ml of 50 mm MOPS-K+ buffer (pH 7.5), and a French pressure cell (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to break the bacterial cells. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (4 °C, 20,000 × g for 30 min). Eventually, 21.2 ml of crude cell extract was obtained. The cell-free supernatant (996 ml) was concentrated to 20 ml by ultrafiltration (10-kDa cutoff membrane), and 1 ml of MOPS-K+ buffer (1 m, pH 7.5) was added to the extracellular protein fraction. The assay mixtures (1 ml) contained extracellular or cellular protein fractions (0.95 ml), 2.5 mm NAD+, and 0.25 mm cholesterol (from 10 mm stock dissolved in 2-propanol). After anaerobic incubation at 30 °C for 2 h, the assay mixtures were extracted using ethyl acetate. The extracts were separated on a TLC plate (Silica Gel 60 F254; thickness, 0.2 mm; 20 × 20 cm (Merck)). An n-hexane-ethyl acetate (65:35, v/v) solvent system was used. The steroid compounds were visualized by spraying the TLC plates with 30% (v/v) H2SO4.
Detection of the Extracellular Steroids in the Denitrifying S. denitrificans Culture
After ultrafiltration (10-kDa cutoff membrane), the filtered cell-free medium (976 ml) was extracted with ethyl acetate. The steroids in the cell-free medium were identified using HPLC.
Steroid Uptake Assay Using Bacterial Cells
S. denitrificans (1 liter) was anaerobically grown with 2.5 mm cholesterol. After S. denitrificans cells completely consumed the substrate, these cells were harvested by centrifugation at room temperature. A. tumefaciens, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa cells were aerobically grown in rich medium (1 liter) containing tryptone, soytone, and NaCl and incubated at 37 °C by shaking (180 rpm) overnight. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellets were washed twice with wash buffer (100 ml of MOPS-K+ buffer (25 mm, pH 7) containing 5% (v/v) 2-propanol and 5 mm MgCl2) to remove substrates remaining on the cell surface. After centrifugation, the washed cell pellets were resuspended in uptake buffer containing 25 mm MOPS-K+ buffer (pH 7) and 5 mm MgCl2, and the cell density was adjusted to an A600 of 1.0. After that, 25 μm cholesterol (stock concentration = 10 mm in 2-propanol) and 25 μm 17β-estradiol (stock concentration = 10 mm in dimethyl sulfoxide) were added to the cell suspensions (1 ml). The assay mixtures were incubated at 30 °C and stirred at 120 rpm. After 10 min of incubation, the bacterial cells were recovered by filtering the assay mixtures through a 0.22-μm Durapore® membrane filter (PVDF, hydrophilic, 47 mm diameter; Millipore), and the membranes were subsequently washed with 10 ml of 25 mm MOPS-K+ buffer (pH 7) containing 1% (v/v) Tween 20 and 50 ml of MOPS-K+ buffer containing 5% (v/v) 2-propanol. After vacuum filtration, the membrane filters were extracted using ethyl acetate (10 ml) three times, and the recovered cholesterol and 17β-estradiol were quantified.
In another experiment, S. denitrificans was anaerobically grown with 2.5 mm cholesterol, cholest-4-en-3-one, AD, or 4 mm palmitate. After the complete consumption of the substrate, the resting cell suspensions (A600 = 1.0) were tested for their cholesterol uptake ability. 25 μm cholesterol and 25 μm 17β-estradiol (for a comparison) were added to the cell suspensions (1 ml).
To investigate the substrate preference of the cholesterol-induced OM transporter, cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells were resuspended in the uptake buffer, and the resulting cell suspensions were incubated with 25 μm of individual catabolic intermediates (from 10 mm stocks dissolved in 2-propanol) at 30 °C for 10 min. Ten catabolic steroids, including C27 sterols, acidic steroids, and C19 androgens, were tested for their uptake efficiency. Where indicated, 60 mm sodium azide (inhibitor of the respiratory chain (38)), 10 mm KCN (inhibitor of protonmotive force (39)), 10 mm sodium orthovanadate (ATPase inhibitor (38)), or 10 mm EDTA (outer membrane permeabilizer (17)) was added to cell suspensions 10 min prior to the addition of cholesterol.
Preparation of Spheroplasts of Different Proteobacteria
S. denitrificans (1 liter) was anaerobically grown with cholesterol (2.5 mm), and A. tumefaciens, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa were aerobically grown in rich medium. Bacterial spheroplasts were prepared according to the procedure described in a previous report (27) with slight modifications. In brief, freshly harvested bacterial cells (0.8 g, wet mass) were resuspended in 64 ml of lysis buffer containing 30 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8), 30% sucrose, 9 mm EDTA, and lysozyme (2.6 × 106 units). The cell suspensions were incubated on ice for 120 min, and the resulting spheroplasts were harvested by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 4 °C, for 20 min).
Steroid Uptake Assay Using Bacterial Spheroplasts
The spheroplasts were gently washed with wash buffer containing MOPS-K+ buffer (25 mm, pH 7), 5% (v/v) 2-propanol, 5 mm MgCl2, and 30% sucrose (w/v). After centrifugation, the pellets were resuspended in uptake buffer containing 25 mm MOPS-K+ buffer (pH 7), 5 mm MgCl2, and 30% sucrose, and the spheroplast density was adjusted to A600 of 1. A 10 mm cholesterol solution (2.5 μl; in 2-propanol) and 2.5 μl of the second steroid (cholest-4-en-3-one, 25-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one, 26-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one, cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid, AD, or ADD; from 10 mm stock dissolved in 2-propanol) were added to the spheroplast suspensions (1 ml). The steroid uptake assays were incubated at 30 °C and stirred gently (80 rpm) for 10 min. The uptake assay mixtures containing 30% sucrose were unable to pass through a 0.22-μm Durapore® membrane filter within 30 min. Therefore, the spheroplasts were recovered by centrifugation. The assays were quenched by adding 9 ml of ice-cold wash buffer containing 30% sucrose and then centrifuged at 16,000 × g and 4 °C for 20 min. The spheroplast pellets were gently washed with a wash buffer (10 ml) again. After centrifugation, the pellets were extracted with ethyl acetate to recover the steroids.
In the competitive experiment, S. denitrificans spheroplasts were incubated with cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid (25 μm) and palmitate (0∼100 μm) at 30 °C for 10 min. After centrifugation, the acidic steroid imported into spheroplasts was quantified using HPLC.
Separation of Subcellular Compartments and the Steroid Transformation Assays Using Fractionated S. denitrificans Proteins
Subcellular fractions were prepared at 4 °C under anoxic conditions. Exponentially growing S. denitrificans cells (2 liters) were harvested by centrifugation, yielding a total of 4.1 g of bacterial cells (wet weight). Cell pellets (2 g; wet weight) were used to prepare the OM and the cytoplasmic membrane. The remaining 2 g of cell pellets was used to prepare periplasmic and cytoplasmic fractions.
Sucrose Gradient Separation of S. denitrificans Membranes
S. denitrificans membrane proteins were separated from soluble proteins as described previously (33). To separate the cytoplasmic membrane from the OM, sucrose gradient centrifugation was performed according to a previously described procedure (40) with some modifications. The membrane pellets were resuspended in 0.5 ml of basal buffer containing 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mm EDTA, and 0.2 mm dithiothreitol. The resulting membrane suspension was layered on a sucrose bed consisting of 20% (w/v; 2 ml), 40% (3 ml), and 50% (1.5 ml) sucrose in the basal buffer. The membrane sample was centrifuged at 4 °C, 120,000 × g for 16 h. The membrane fractions (0.5 ml per fraction) were carefully collected from the top of the gradient. The fractions containing the OM and cytoplasmic membrane were identified based on the distributions of NADH oxidase activity (specific marker of cytoplasmic membrane) and the OM-specific lipopolysaccharide 2-keto-3-deoxyoxtonate (KDO). Both the cytoplasmic and OM fractions were diluted to 10 ml by using 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5).
Isolation of Periplasmic and Cytoplasmic Proteins from S. denitrificans Cells
The S. denitrificans spheroplasts were prepared using the EDTA/lysozyme treatment described above. The spheroplasts were harvested by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 4 °C for 20 min), and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 4 °C and 120,000 × g for 1.5 h to remove insoluble membrane debris. The resulting periplasmic protein fraction was concentrated to 10 ml by using an Amicon ultracentrifugal filter unit (Ultracel-10K, Millipore). The periplasmic proteins were passed through a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) to remove the sucrose, and 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) was used to elute the proteins. The spheroplast pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of Tris-HCl (10 mm, pH 7.5) and broken using a French pressure cell. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 120,000 × g for 1.5 h to separate cytoplasmic proteins from insoluble membranes.
Assays for Subcellular Markers
NADH oxidase activity was measured as described in a previous report (40), and malate dehydrogenase (a specific cytoplasmic marker) was assayed as described in another report (41). KDO was quantified by performing the thiobarbituric acid assay after the membrane fractions were precipitated using 13% trichloroacetic acid (42). Cytochrome c content (periplasmic marker) in subcellular fractions was analyzed and calculated as described (43).
In Vitro Steroid Biotransformation Assays
The assay mixtures contained fractionated S. denitrificans proteins (0.25 ml), 0.65 ml of Tris-HCl buffer (10 mm, pH 7.5), 0.2 mm steroid substrate (from 10 mm stock dissolved in 2-propanol), 1 mm electron accepter or electron donor (from 100 mm stock dissolved in water), and 100 mg of (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin. The reactions were initiated by the addition of the steroid substrate, and the mixtures were shaken at 200 rpm. After 2 h of anaerobic incubation at 30 °C, the steroids were extracted with ethyl acetate. The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was redissolved in 100 μl of acetonitrile for HPLC analysis. The cholesterol dehydrogenase (AcmA) activity was assayed using cholesterol as the substrate and NAD+ as the electron acceptor. Cholest-4-en-3-one-Δ1-dehydrogenase (AcmB) activity was assayed using 25-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one and K3(Fe(CN)6) as the substrate and electron acceptor, respectively. Steroid C25 dehydrogenase (S25DH) contained cholesta-1,4-diene-3-one and K3(Fe(CN)6). The reduction activity of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase was assayed by using estrone as the substrate and NADH as the electron donor. The reduction activity of steroid Δ4-dehydrogenase was assayed using 1-dehydrotestosterone as the substrate and NADH as the electron donor, as well as 2 mm KCN to inhibit the subsequent catabolic enzyme, 1-testosterone hydratase. The 1-testosterone hydratase activity assay contained 1-testosterone and 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol. 1,3-Ketosteroid hydrolase activity was assayed using androstan-1,3,17-triol as the substrate, and no electron acceptor was added. The enzyme activities of AcmA, AcmB, S25DH, steroid Δ4-dehydrogenase, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and 1,3-ketosteroid hydrolase were analyzed by performing HPLC quantification of the steroid products (cholest-4-en-3-one, 25-hydroxycholesta-1,4-diene-3-one, 25-hydroxycholesta-1,4-diene-3-one, 1-testosterone, 17β-estradiol, and 2,3-SAOA, respectively). The 1-testosterone hydratase activity was analyzed by quantifying the residual substrate (1-testosterone) in the assay mixtures.
Dissociation of Cholest-4-en-3-one-Δ1-dehydrogenase from the Cytoplasmic Membranes of S. denitrificans
In a preliminary experiment, the total proteins (23 mg/ml) extracted from the denitrifying S. denitrificans cells were anaerobically incubated with 0.2% (w/v) Tween 20 at room temperature for 10 min. Soluble proteins were then separated from membrane proteins by centrifugation. The enzyme assays (1 ml) contained 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), various S. denitrificans protein fractions (5 mg), 25-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one (0.2 mm), and 1 mm K3(Fe(CN)6). After anaerobic incubation for 2 h, the steroids in the assays were separated using TLC and were observed under UV light at 254 nm.
Freshly harvested S. denitrificans cells (0.8 g) were resuspended in 64 ml of lysis buffer, and the cell suspensions were anaerobically incubated on ice for 2 h. 16 ml of 1% (w/v) Tween 20 was then slowly added to the resulting spheroplast suspension, and the Tween 20-treated spheroplasts were incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The periplasmic and dissociated membrane proteins (formerly located on the outer surface of the cytoplasmic membrane) were separated from the spheroplasts by centrifugation. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 4 °C and 120,000 × g for 1.5 h to remove insoluble membrane debris and then concentrated to 10 ml through ultrafiltration. The proteins were passed through a PD-10 desalting column to remove the sucrose, and 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) was used to elute the proteins. The spheroplast pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). After passing through a French pressure cell, the cell lysate was treated with 0.2% (w/v) Tween 20. After 10 min of anaerobic incubation at room temperature, the cytoplasmic and dissociated membrane proteins (formerly located on the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane) were separated from the membranes by centrifugation. The AcmB activity of the resulting “peripheral-periplasmic” and “peripheral-cytoplasmic” fractions containing dissociated membranes proteins was tested, and the enzyme activity was analyzed by performing HPLC quantification of the steroid product, 25-hydroxycholesta-1,4-diene-3-one.
Quantification of Proteins and Steroids
The protein content was determined using the PierceTM BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer's instructions, and bovine serum albumin was used as the standard. The steroids (excluding cholesterol) were quantified using HPLC as described in a previous report (10). Cholesterol did not exhibit apparent UV absorption (with a HPLC-UV detection limit above 5 μg). Thus, the cholesterol was quantified using the o-phthalaldehyde method (34), which features a detection limit of 500 ng.
UPLC-HRMS
The ethyl acetate-extractable samples were analyzed using UPLC-APCI-HRMS as described previously (10).
Statistical Analysis
One-way analysis of variance (Tukey test with a 95% confidence interval) was performed using the JMP statistical software (Version 10.0.2, SAS Corp., Chicago).
RESULTS
Identification of the Cholesterol Catabolic Intermediates in the Denitrifying S. denitrificans Culture
To investigate the intermediates involved in anoxic cholesterol catabolism, denitrifying S. denitrificans cells were grown with [4C-13C]cholesterol. We used UPLC-APCI-HRMS to identify the 13C-labeled intermediates (Table 1); a total of 11 were identified, including the characteristic 2,3-SAOA. With the exception of two intermediates, cholest-4-en-26-al-3-one and androstan-1,3,17-trione, the UPLC and HRMS behaviors of the detected intermediates were identical to those of authentic standards. Our results exclude the possibility of detecting structural isomers, which may be observed in chemical analyses relying only on mass spectrometry. In this study, we clearly revealed that 26-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one and cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid are crucial intermediates involved in the anoxic cholesterol catabolism of S. denitrificans.
TABLE 1.
Detection of 13C-labeled cholesterol and its catabolic intermediates in an anaerobically [4C-13C]cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans culture using UPLC-APCI-HRMS
Compound ID | UPLC behavior (RT,a min) | Molecular formula/predicted molecular massb | Most dominant ion peak/predicted elemental composition | Identification of product ion |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cholesterolc | 11.78 | C27H46O | 370.3555 | [M − H2O + 1 + H] + |
386.3537 | 12C2613CH45 | |||
Cholest-4-en-3-onec | 11.48 | C27H44O | 386.3504 | [M + 1 + H] + |
384.3381 | 12C2613CH45O | |||
25-Hydroxycholest-4-en-3-oned | 8.04 | C27H44O2 | 402.3453 | [M + 1 + H] + |
400.3330 | 12C2613CH45O2 | |||
26-Hydroxycholest-4-en-3-onec | 8.37 | C27H44O2 | 402.3430 | [M + 1 + H] + |
400.3330 | 12C2613CH45O2 | |||
Cholest-4-en-26-al-3-one | 8.53 | C27H42O2 | 400.3295 | [M + 1 + H] + |
398.3174 | 12C2613CH43O2 | |||
Cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acidc | 8.24 | C27H42O3 | 416.3246 | [M + 1 + H] + |
414.3123 | 12C2613CH43O3 | |||
Cholest-4-en-3-one-24-oic acidc | 5.81 | C24H36O3 | 374.2768 | [M + 1 + H] + |
372.2655 | 12C2313CH37O3 | |||
Pregn-4-en-3-one-20-carboxylic acidc | 5.10 | C22H32O3 | 346.2463 | [M + 1 + H] + |
344.2343 | 12C2113CH33O3 | |||
ADc | 3.62 | C19H26O2 | 288.2052 | [M + 1 + H] + |
286.1926 | 12C1813CH27O2 | |||
ADDc | 3.21 | C19H24O2 | 286.1896 | [M + 1 + H] + |
284.1770 | 12C1813CH25O2 | |||
Androstan-1,3,17-trione | 2.40 | C19H26O3 | 304.1994 | [M + 1 + H] + |
302.1875 | 12C1813CH27O3 | |||
2,3-SAOAd | 2.76 | C19H30O4 | 306.2150 | [M − H2O + 1 + H] + |
322.2136 | 12C1813CH29O3 |
a RT means retention time.
b The predicated molecular mass was calculated using the atomic mass of 12C (12.0000), 16O (15.9949), and 1H (1.0078).
c Compounds exhibited identical UPLC-HRMS behavior with steroid standards purchased from Sigma, Avanti Polar Lipids, or Steraloids.
d Compounds exhibited identical UPLC-HRMS behavior with NMR-confirmed steroids produced in our laboratory.
Biosurfactant Production by S. denitrificans
Several assays were performed to test biosurfactant production by denitrifying S. denitrificans. Cultures grown on cholesterol under anoxic conditions did not foam. In addition, no significant differences (p > 0.5) in the oil displacement activity of cell-free culture supernatants and uninoculated medium existed. Moreover, no significant surface tension reduction (p > 0.5) was detected in the cell suspension or cell-free culture supernatant compared with the uninoculated medium (Fig. 1A). Washed cell suspension emulsified kerosene with an emulsification index (E24) of 48% (p < 0.0001). No emulsions were produced when kerosene was incubated with cell-free culture supernatant or uninoculated medium (Fig. 1A).
FIGURE 1.
A, emulsification index (E24) and surface tension (ST) measurements in the S. denitrificans culture anaerobically grown on cholesterol. B, fraction of bacterial cells partitioned to the hydrocarbon phase measured using the BATH assay. The data shown are the means ± S.E. of three experimental measurements.
Hydrophobicity of the S. denitrificans Cell Surface
The surface hydrophobicity of S. denitrificans and P. aeruginosa cells was tested using the BATH assay, in which n-hexadecane served as the organic phase. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was widely used in surface hydrophobicity studies (44, 45) and showed hexadecane adherence of 11.5 ± 0.2% (Fig. 1B). Regardless of growth substrate, the cell surface of S. denitrificans exhibited hydrophobic characteristics. The fraction of cholesterol-grown cells adhering to the hydrocarbon phase (37.9 ± 0.6%) was higher than that of palmitate-grown S. denitrificans cells (29.7 ± 0.3%) (Fig. 1B).
Cholesterol Catabolic Enzymes Were Not Detected in the Extracellular Medium
The crude cell extract of S. denitrificans transformed most of the cholesterol to cholest-4-en-3-one and the ensuing intermediates (Fig. 2A, lane 4). Note that only residual cholesterol, but not cholest-4-en-3-one, was detected in the concentrated extracellular protein fraction (Fig. 2A, lane 5). Cholesterol remained after 2 h of incubation with extracellular proteins (Fig. 2A, lane 6), indicating that these proteins did not exhibit cholesterol dehydrogenase activity. In addition, the extracellular steroid profile of the denitrifying S. denitrificans culture indicated that cholesterol was the only steroid present in the extracellular medium (Fig. 2B).
FIGURE 2.
A, thin layer chromatograms showing that cholesterol dehydrogenase activity was not detected in the cell-free medium. Lane 1, authentic steroid standards; lane 2, negative control (steroid substrate only, without the addition of S. denitrificans proteins); lane 3, negative control (crude cell extract only, without the addition of a steroid substrate); lane 4, crude cell extract incubated with cholesterol; lane 5, negative control (extracellular proteins only, without the addition of a steroid substrate); lane 6, extracellular proteins incubated with cholesterol. B, extracellular steroid profile extracted from the denitrifying cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans culture. Three steroid standards (10–100 μg) are shown in the upper HPLC.
Steroid Uptake by Whole Bacterial Cells
The steroid uptake abilities of cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans (β-proteobacterium), P. aeruginosa (γ-proteobacterium), A. tumefaciens (α-proteobacterium), and E. coli (γ-proteobacterium) were tested. Cholesterol and 17β-estradiol (a comparison) were added to cell suspensions in a 1:1 molar ratio. It is worth mentioning that 17β-estradiol was unable to serve as the carbon and energy source for all tested bacterial strains, and the non-Sterolibacterium species cannot utilize cholesterol. As shown in Fig. 3A, small amounts of 17β-estradiol were detected in the cells of all tested bacterial strains. Three non-Sterolibacterium proteobacteria imported comparable amounts of cholesterol and 17β-estradiol and exhibited steroid uptake rates of less than 0.5 nmol/min/mg protein. S. denitrificans exhibited significantly greater cholesterol uptake ability (p < 0.0001) than the non-cholesterol-degrading proteobacteria (Fig. 3A). After residual cholesterol remaining in bacterial cells was excluded, the cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells imported 20.3 ± 3.2 nmol of cholesterol/mg of protein after 10 min of incubation. The 17β-estradiol uptake rate was lower than that of cholesterol in the S. denitrificans cell suspension (p < 0.0001). Moreover, no significant differences in the 17β-estradiol uptake rate existed among the tested cell suspensions (p > 0.05).
FIGURE 3.
A, steroid uptake by whole cells of various proteobacteria. Cholesterol (25 μm) and 17β-estradiol (25 μm) were added to the whole cell assays, which were incubated for 10 min. B, cell suspensions of S. denitrificans anaerobically grown with different substrates (cholesterol, cholest-4-en-3-one, AD, or palmitate) were tested for their cholesterol uptake ability. The data shown are the means ± S.E. of three experimental measurements.
Our model organism can only utilize a few hydrophobic compounds as the carbon source (30). Here, S. denitrificans cells grown on different substrates were tested for their cholesterol uptake ability (Fig. 3B). Regardless of the carbon source, the S. denitrificans cells imported more cholesterol than 17β-estradiol (presumably imported via passive diffusion). However, sterol-grown S. denitrificans cells exhibited greater (2-fold) cholesterol uptake rate (p < 0.0001) than that of the cells grown on AD or palmitate. The result indicates that C27 sterols can induce the production of the cholesterol OM transporter, although this transporter seems to be produced at a basal level with other substrates.
We then tested the substrate preference of the OM cholesterol transporter system. As shown in Fig. 4A, its uptake efficiencies for cholesterol and cholest-4-en-3-one were significantly higher than those of C19 androgens (p < 0.0001). This was in accordance with the observation that AD-grown S. denitrificans cells cannot efficiently import cholesterol (Fig. 3B). The OM steroid transporter prefers 4-en-3-one structures over 1,4-diene-3-one compounds. It appears that cholesterol, cholest-4-en-3-one, and cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid are the most favorable substrates for this OM steroid transporter (Fig. 4A).
FIGURE 4.
A, specific uptake rates of different steroids by cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells. B, effects of the respiratory inhibitor (60 mm sodium azide), protonmotive force inhibitor (10 mm KCN), ATPase inhibitor (10 mm sodium orthovanadate), and OM permeabilizer (10 mm EDTA) on the cholesterol uptake of S. denitrificans. The data shown are the means ± S.E. of three experimental measurements.
Cholesterol uptake activity was not abolished by preincubation of cells with the respiratory inhibitor (60 mm sodium azide) or the inhibitor of protonmotive force (10 mm KCN) (Fig. 4B), suggesting that a TonB-dependent transporter system (24, 25, 39) is not involved in cholesterol uptake of S. denitrificans. In addition, the ATPase inhibitor (10 mm vanadate) did not reduce the cholesterol uptake activity (Fig. 4B), indicating that the steroid uptake is ATP-independent. Our data thus exclude the possibility that an Mce-type steroid transporter works in cholesterol uptake of S. denitrificans (15, 16). It is known that the cation chelator EDTA is able to improve the membrane permeability of Gram-negative bacteria by chelating the divalent cations that cross-bridge the lipopolysaccharide covering the cell surface (17). EDTA (10 mm) did not enhance the cholesterol uptake of S. denitrificans cells (Fig. 4B), indicating that this hydrophobic substrate is not mainly absorbed via passive diffusion. The EDTA-induced decrease in cholesterol uptake (39%) may have resulted from the damage or disintegration of the OM and the OM-located cholesterol transporter system.
Steroid Uptake by the Bacterial Spheroplasts
Spheroplasts were first prepared from anaerobically cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells by using lysozyme/EDTA treatment. The steroid uptake efficiency of the S. denitrificans spheroplasts was tested. Fig. 5A shows the individual steroid uptake rates (nanomoles/min/mg of protein) divided by that of the cholesterol. The uptake efficiency for cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid and 26-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one was significantly higher than that of the other tested steroids (p < 0.0001). It appears that cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid is the most favorable substrate for S. denitrificans spheroplasts. Interestingly, the uptake efficiency of the two C27 hydroxysteroid isomers was apparently different (p < 0.0001). S. denitrificans spheroplasts seemed to prefer the 26-hydroxysteroid to the 25-hydroxyl isomer. The C19 androgens, AD and ADD, were poorly imported by S. denitrificans spheroplasts (Fig. 5A).
FIGURE 5.
Steroid uptake by the spheroplasts of S. denitrificans anaerobically grown with cholesterol. A, relative steroid uptake efficiency of S. denitrificans spheroplasts. The uptake efficiency of cholesterol (the internal control) in each assay was set at one, and the uptake rate of the second steroid substrate is shown relative to that of cholesterol. B, effect of palmitate (0–100 μm) on the cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid uptake by S. denitrificans spheroplasts. The data shown are the means ± S.E. of three experimental measurements.
In another experiment, the steroid uptake abilities of various proteobacteria spheroplasts were tested (Fig. 6A). Regardless of the bacterial species, >80% of the malate dehydrogenase activity remained in spheroplasts (Fig. 6B), indicating that the bacterial spheroplasts were properly prepared. Significant differences were observed between the uptake efficiencies of cholesterol and cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid (p < 0.0001), and all spheroplasts preferentially took up cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid (Fig. 6A). Surprisingly, spheroplasts in all tested strains, including three non-cholesterol degraders, imported comparable amounts of cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid after 10 min of incubation.
FIGURE 6.
A, steroid uptake by the spheroplasts of various proteobacteria. S. denitrificans was anaerobically grown on cholesterol, and the other proteobacteria were aerobically grown in rich medium. B, subcellular distribution of malate dehydrogenase (a cytoplasmic marker protein) in the periplasm and cytoplasm of four tested proteobacteria.
Because (i) the cytoplasmic transporter responsible for cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid seems to be ubiquitous in proteobacteria, and (ii) S. denitrificans can also utilize fatty acids, one can envisage that S. denitrificans may use cytoplasmic membrane-located fatty acid transporter to import fatty acids and the acidic steroid intermediate. We incubated S. denitrificans spheroplasts with cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid (25 μm) and palmitate (0–100 μm), and we tested the effects of palmitate on the uptake efficiency of this acidic steroid. Regardless of the concentration of palmitate, S. denitrificans spheroplasts showed no significant difference in the cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid uptake rate (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5B). Our result suggests that S. denitrificans does not adopt the same cytoplasmic transporter to import palmitate and cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid.
Subcellular Localization of Cholesterol Catabolic Enzymes in S. denitrificans
To identify the subcellular locations where individual cholesterol catabolic reactions occurred, we separated S. denitrificans cells into four subcellular fractions by using lysozyme/EDTA treatment of whole cells to isolate the periplasmic and cytoplasmic fractions and density gradient centrifugation to separate the OM and cytoplasmic membrane. The periplasmic marker cytochrome c was largely released to the supernatant (87%) after the lysozyme/EDTA treatment of bacterial cells, whereas 79% of the cytoplasmic marker malate dehydrogenase was retained in the spheroplasts (Fig. 7A). The protein distribution pattern of the sucrose gradient fractions indicated two major peaks (Fig. 7B). The distribution of the OM marker (KDO) and the cytoplasmic membrane marker (NADH oxidase) suggested that the two membrane fractions were efficiently resolved.
FIGURE 7.
Subcellular fractionation of S. denitrificans proteins. A, distribution of malate dehydrogenase (DH) and cytochrome c (periplasmic marker) in the periplasmic, cytoplasmic, and membrane fractions. B, membrane fractions separated using sucrose density gradient centrifugation were collected from the top of the gradient (left of the figure). The fractions containing the cytoplasmic membrane and OM were identified based on NADH oxidase activity and KDO content, respectively.
We then tested the cholesterol catabolic activities of the four resulting protein fractions by using HPLC-based assays. No cholesterol catabolic activity was majorly distributed in the outer membrane fraction (Fig. 8), indicating that OM-bound proteins are not critical for cholesterol catabolism. AcmA activity was mainly detected in the periplasmic fraction (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 8A). Conversely, cytoplasmic membranes exhibited the greatest AcmB and S25DH activities (p < 0.0001). However, the two enzymes were also detected in the periplasmic and cytoplasmic fractions (Fig. 8, B and C). The cytoplasmic fraction exhibited significantly greater androgen transformation activities (Fig. 8, D–G), suggesting that C1 hydroxylation and A-ring cleavage of C19 intermediates occurred in the cytoplasm of S. denitrificans.
FIGURE 8.
Steroid transformation activities detected in various protein fractions. Proteins of anaerobically cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells were separated into OM (0.4 mg/ml), periplasmic (1.5 mg/liter), cytoplasmic membrane (IM; 0.7 mg/ml), and cytoplasmic fractions (3.3 mg/liter). Four protein fractions were all adjusted to 10 ml, and 0.25 ml of the fractionated S. denitrificans proteins was added to individual steroid transformation assay mixtures. The data shown are the means ± S.E. of three experimental measurements.
The subcellular localization of AcmB was further investigated. We first showed the dissociation of AcmB from membranes (containing outer and cytoplasmic membranes) by a 0.2% (w/v) Tween 20 treatment for 10 min (Fig. 9A). We then incubated S. denitrificans spheroplasts with 0.2% Tween 20 for various amounts of time (0–40 min), during which most malate dehydrogenase activity remained in the cytoplasm (Fig. 9B). These results indicated that a 10-min treatment with 0.2% Tween 20 solubilized membrane-bound AcmB but did not apparently lyse S. denitrificans spheroplasts. We then used 0.2% Tween 20 to solubilize the peripheral proteins located on the periplasmic and cytoplasmic sides of the cytoplasmic membrane, and we tested the AcmB activity of the resulting peripheral-periplasmic and peripheral-cytoplasmic protein fractions. Most enzyme activity was detected in the peripheral-cytoplasmic protein fraction (Fig. 9C), indicating that AcmB was located on the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane.
FIGURE 9.
Subcellular localization of AcmB. A, dissociation of membrane-bound AcmB induced by a 0.2% Tween 20 treatment. A, lane 1, total proteins (without a Tween 20 treatment); lane 2, membrane-bound proteins (without a Tween 20 treatment); lane 3, soluble proteins (without a Tween 20 treatment); lane 4, membrane-bound proteins (with a Tween 20 treatment); and lane 5, soluble proteins (with a Tween 20 treatment). B, malate dehydrogenase activity detected in peripheral-periplasmic and peripheral-cytoplasmic protein fractions of the Tween 20-treated S. denitrificans spheroplasts. C, AcmB activity detected in the peripheral-periplasmic and peripheral-cytoplasmic protein fractions of the Tween 20-treated S. denitrificans spheroplasts.
DISCUSSION
We previously proposed an oxygenase-independent cholesterol catabolic pathway for the aerobically grown S. denitrificans cells (10). In this study, we applied a 13C metabolomic approach to demonstrate that the denitrifying S. denitrificans adopts a highly similar strategy to degrade cholesterol. The highly similar protein patterns of the anaerobically and aerobically grown cells (31) suggest that S. denitrificans may use the same catabolic enzymes to degrade cholesterol regardless of oxygen availability. It is worth mentioning that the denitrifying S. denitrificans cells produce mainly 17-hydroxyl catabolic intermediates (Fig. 10), whereas aerobically grown cells accumulate 17-ketosteroids (10).
FIGURE 10.
Proposed model of substrate uptake and subcellular compartmentation of anoxic cholesterol catabolism by S. denitrificans cells. IM, inner membrane.
These results provided clues to the potential cholesterol uptake mechanism adopted by S. denitrificans. The microbial degradation of hydrophobic substrates, like cholesterol, is usually hampered by their low solubility in water (poor bioavailability). Some hydrocarbon degraders overcome this problem by producing solubilizing/emulsifying agents such as biosurfactants, which enhance the aqueous solubility and therefore the bioavailability of the hydrophobic substrates (46). S. denitrificans does not seem to belong to this group of microbes. The lack of foaming, surface tension reduction, and emulsification activity in the cell-free culture medium excludes the possibility that S. denitrificans produces and excretes biosurfactants into the extracellular medium. Accordingly, S. denitrificans cells possibly interact directly with insoluble cholesterol by adhesion to facilitate the uptake process. This is another known hydrocarbon uptake mechanism by which bacteria circumvent the poor bioavailability of the hydrocarbon substrates (47). These bacteria are characterized by a hydrophobic cell surface enabling efficient adhesion to hydrocarbons (48). The emulsification of kerosene with washed S. denitrificans cells indicates the ability of the cells to adhere to hydrocarbons via a hydrophobic surface. This was corroborated by the results of the cell surface hydrophobicity assay, which clearly showed that S. denitrificans cells possess a hydrophobic surface. We discuss further evidence for the proposed adhesion-mediated cholesterol uptake later in the context of the uptake experiments.
Accumulating evidence indicates that the OM of Gram-negative bacteria serves as a selective permeability barrier, because its asymmetric structure with lipopolysaccharides results in an unusually slow influx of hydrophobic compounds such as steroids (49). Previous investigations have revealed that the diffusion of steroids across the OM of nonsteroid-degrading Gram-negative bacteria was approximately 2 orders of magnitude slower than diffusion through a cytoplasmic membrane containing phospholipid bilayers (17, 49). Although steroids could passively diffuse through the OM bilayer of S. denitrificans, our current data disproved the crucial role of passive diffusion in the cholesterol uptake of S. denitrificans because of the following: (i) the cholesterol uptake efficiency of cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells was significantly higher than that of palmitate-grown S. denitrificans cells and other tested proteobacterial species; (ii) the steroid uptake pattern of cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cells exhibited high substrate selectivity; and (iii) the cholesterol uptake of S. denitrificans is not enhanced by preincubation with EDTA. It is well documented that the OM of Gram-negative bacteria contains proteins that form channels for the facilitated diffusion of small molecules (20). Three types of OM channel have been observed as follows: the porins, the FadL family, and the TBDRs (19–25). Our current data implied that the OM channel of S. denitrificans is critical in cholesterol uptake, and the inducible transporter system appears to selectively import cholesterol across the OM. Unfortunately, the cholesterol transport system of S. denitrificans is not currently studied at molecular levels. Nevertheless, it appears that the induced cholesterol transporter is neither a porin nor a TBDR-similar protein because of the following: (i) the porins are not substrate-specific and show no apparent differences in the uptake of different steroids; (ii) the OM cholesterol transporter is not sensitive to the respiratory inhibitor (azide) or the inhibitor of protonmotive force (cyanide); and (iii) TBDRs, the active transporters, mediate the uptake of large (>600 Da) hydrophilic molecules such as vitamin B12 and iron siderophores (24, 25). Moreover, in the absence of carrier molecules (e.g. (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin), S. denitrificans cannot import cholesterol at concentrations below 1 μm. Relevant literature demonstrated that, with the aid of active transporter system of TBDRs, bacteria are able to salvage vitamin B12 from the environment, even below 50 nm (50). A study on the OM channels responsible for the uptake of monoaromatic hydrocarbons indicated that the OM proteins (TbuX and TodX) are highly substrate-specific (20). Both TbuX and TodX (which belong to the FadL family) cannot transport long-chain fatty acids, although their primary structures are similar to that of the FadL in E. coli. The OM steroid transporter of S. denitrificans also exhibited high substrate specificity that efficiently imports various C27 sterols but not C19 androgens. In addition, these hydrophobic channels contain covalent-bound detergent molecules located on the extracellular surface, corresponding to the observation of high surface hydrophobicity and the lack of biosurfactants in the cell-free medium of cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cultures.
As mentioned previously, bacteria cannot easily access cholesterol because of its extremely low aqueous solubility. One may envisage that bacteria have to activate and solubilize this substrate by secreting extracellular enzymes. Our data clearly showed that S. denitrificans does not produce any extracellular cholesterol catabolic enzymes. Furthermore, no catabolic intermediates were detected in the cell-free media of the cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cultures. These results contradict those of previous studies that showed that some microorganisms produce extracellular enzymes (e.g. cholesterol oxidase) to transform cholesterol (29). In addition, during oxic degradation of bile acids by the Gram-negative Pseudomonas sp. strain Chol1, catabolic intermediates are exported to the media (4, 51). Similar extracellular accumulation of metabolites has been observed in aerobically cholate-grown Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 (52). It is appealing to postulate that, in case of S. denitrificans, cholesterol uptake precedes catabolic reactions.
In a previous investigation, AcmA was identified as an NAD+-dependent enzyme belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family (31). Here, we showed that AcmA is a periplasmic protein. The existence of free NAD(P)+ in the periplasm seems unlikely for various reasons (53), although there is no direct experimental evidence regarding this matter. The primary structure of AcmA is highly similar to that of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isolated from various bacteria, including Comamonas testosteroni (31). The 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase of C. testosteroni (formerly named Pseudomonas testosteroni (54)) was also reported to be a periplasmic protein (55). In the past decades, various NAD(P)+-dependent enzymes, including glucose-fructose oxidoreductase from Zymomonas mobilis (53) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Aeromonas hydrophila (56), were also identified as periplasmic proteins. These periplasmic enzymes contain tightly associated NAD(P)+, which is not released during the catalytic cycle.
In a recent study, the S25DH of S. denitrificans was isolated and characterized (28) and was suggested to be associated with the periplasmic side of the cytoplasmic membrane. In the oxic cholesterol catabolism of M. tuberculosis, cholest-4-en-3-one is oxidized to cholest-4-en-3-one-27-oic acid by the bifunctional steroid C27 monooxygenase (CYP125A1), with 27-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one serving as the intermediate (57). This oxygenase cannot function in anoxic cholesterol catabolism, and S. denitrificans adopts an alternative strategy to activate the acyl side chain of cholesterol. The S. denitrificans enzymes catalyzing the oxidation of 25-hydroxycholest-4-en-3-one to cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid have yet to be studied. The pyrroloquinolone quinone-dependent and FAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases located on the periplasmic side of the Gram-negative bacterium cytoplasmic membranes have been thoroughly examined (58). However, these enzymes have not been reported to play a role in steroid metabolism.
Aerobic actinobacteria (7) and anaerobic S. denitrificans (this study) have been proposed to degrade the side chain of cholesterol by β-oxidation-like reactions. These data suggested that side-chain degradation occurs in the S. denitrificans cytoplasm as follows: (i) the C19 androgens did not efficiently pass through the cytoplasmic membrane of S. denitrificans, and we detected no C19 intermediates in the periplasm of S. denitrificans; and (ii) the fatty acid degradation by β-oxidation is a cytoplasmic process due to the ATP void in the periplasm (59). Although C27-C22 acidic intermediates were detected in the aerobically (10) and anaerobically (this study) cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cultures, the proposed CoA-thioesters of the acidic steroid intermediates have never been observed. Therefore, the side-chain degradation mechanism awaits further investigations.
A previous study (60) suggested cholest-4-en-3-one to be the native substrate of AcmB; however, the enzymatic assays indicated that this FAD-dependent enzyme also catalyzes the oxidation of various steroid intermediates, including progesterone (C21) and AD (C19). Interestingly, AcmB appeared to prefer the C21 and C19 steroids over cholest-4-en-3-one (60). Our current results indicated that AcmB exists on the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane of S. denitrificans. In the cholesterol catabolism of S. denitrificans, cholest-4-en-3-one is not the native substrate for AcmB, because its product, cholesta-1,4-diene-3-one, was never detected in the cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cultures. By contrast, ADD, the 1,4-diene structure of AD, has been detected in aerobically (10) and anaerobically grown S. denitrificans cells. According to our results from subcellular localization and the substrate preference of AcmB, as well as the metabolomic investigations of cholesterol-grown S. denitrificans cultures, we suggest that AD is the physiological substrate of AcmB.
Summary
Here, we studied anoxic cholesterol catabolism at the subcellular level. Based on the presented results, we propose a model for cholesterol uptake and subcellular compartmentation during cholesterol catabolism by a Gram-negative bacterium (Fig. 10). The cells of S. denitrificans access cholesterol via direct adhesion followed by outer membrane transport. The facilitated diffusion might be mediated by a member of the FadL family. In the periplasm, initial catabolic reactions, including oxidation of the 3-hydroxy group, double bond isomerization, and a series of side-chain activation reactions, occur. These reactions result in the transformation of cholesterol to cholest-4-en-3-one-26-oic acid, which then crosses the cytoplasmic membrane. In the cytoplasm, the side-chain degradation occurs by reactions similar to β-oxidation, followed by sterane cleavage and further catabolism. The bacterial cytoplasm was considered the major compartment in which hydrocarbon catabolism occurs. However, in this study, we showed that the enzymes located in the periplasmic space are critical for cholesterol catabolism, especially during the steps of substrate activation.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Small Molecule Metabolomics Core Facility sponsored by the Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, for providing UPLC-HRMS analyses. Special thanks are due to Yi-Chun Lin of the Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, for the graphic design.
This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan Grant 103-2311-B-001-013.
- OM
- outer membrane
- AcmA
- cholesterol dehydrogenase
- AcmB
- cholest-4-en-3-one-Δ1-dehydrogenase
- AD
- androst-4-en-3,17-dione
- ADD
- androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione
- HRMS
- high resolution mass spectrometry
- 2,3-SAOA
- 17-hydroxy-1-oxo-2,3-seco-androstan-3-oic acid
- S25DH
- steroid C25 dehydrogenase
- UPLC
- ultra-performance liquid chromatography
- TBDR
- TonB-dependent outer membrane receptor
- BATH
- bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons assay
- KDO
- 2-keto-3-deoxyoxtonate
- APCI
- atmospheric pressure chemical ionization.
REFERENCES
- 1. Chang T. Y., Chang C. C., Ohgami N., Yamauchi Y. (2006) Cholesterol sensing, trafficking, and esterification. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 129–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. O'Brien D. K., Melville S. B. (2004) Effects of Clostridium perfringens α-toxin (PLC) and perfringolysin O (PFO) on cytotoxicity to macrophages, on escape from the phagosomes of macrophages, and on persistence of C. perfringens in host tissues. Infect. Immun. 72, 5204–5215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hotze E. M., Le H. M., Sieber J. R., Bruxvoort C., McInerney M. J., Tweten R. K. (2013) Identification and characterization of the first cholesterol-dependent cytolysins from Gram-negative bacteria. Infect. Immun. 81, 216–225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Philipp B. (2011) Bacterial degradation of bile salts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 89, 903–915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mackenzie A. S., Brassell S. C., Eglinton G., Maxwell J. R. (1982) Chemical fossils: the geological fate of steroids. Science 217, 491–504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fernandes P., Cruz A., Angelova B., Pinheiro H. M., Cabral J. M. S. (2003) Microbial conversion of steroid compounds: recent developments. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 32, 688–705 [Google Scholar]
- 7. Donova M. V. (2007) Transformation of steroids by actinobacteria: a review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 43, 1–14 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. García J. L., Uhía I., Galán B. (2012) Catabolism and biotechnological applications of cholesterol degrading bacteria. Microb. Biotechnol. 5, 679–699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ismail W., Chiang Y. R. (2011) Oxic and anoxic metabolism of steroids by bacteria. J. Bioremed. Biodegrad. 10.4172/2155-6199 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wang P. H., Lee T. H., Ismail W., Tsai C. Y., Lin C. W., Tsai Y. W., Chiang Y. R. (2013) An oxygenase-independent cholesterol catabolic pathway operates under oxic conditions. PLoS One 8, e66675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pandey A. K., Sassetti C. M. (2008) Mycobacterial persistence requires the utilization of host cholesterol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4376–4380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Van der Geize R, Yam K., Heuser T., Wilbrink M. H., Hara H., Anderton M. C., Sim E., Dijkhuizen L., Davies J. E., Mohn W. W., Eltis L. D. (2007) A gene cluster encoding cholesterol catabolism in a soil actinomycete provides insight into Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 1947–1952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ouellet H., Johnston J. B., de Montellano P. R. (2011) Cholesterol catabolism as a therapeutic target in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol. 19, 530–539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chitale S., Ehrt S., Kawamura I., Fujimura T., Shimono N., Anand N., Lu S., Cohen-Gould L., Riley L. W. (2001) Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein associated with mammalian cell entry. Cell. Microbiol. 3, 247–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Casali N., Riley L. W. (2007) A phylogenetic analysis of the actinomycetales mce operons. BMC Genomics 8, 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. McLeod M. P., Warren R. L., Hsiao W. W., Araki N., Myhre M., Fernandes C., Miyazawa D., Wong W., Lillquist A. L., Wang D., Dosanjh M., Hara H., Petrescu A., Morin R. D., Yang G., Stott J. M., Schein J. E., Shin H., Smailus D., Siddiqui A. S., Marra M. A., Jones S. J., Holt R., Brinkman F. S., Miyauchi K., Fukuda M., Davies J. E., Mohn W. W., Eltis L. D. (2006) The complete genome of Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 provides insights into a catabolic powerhouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 15582–15587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Plésiat P., Nikaido H. (1992) Outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria are permeable to steroid probes. Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1323–1333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wülfing C., Plückthun A. (1994) Correctly folded T-cell receptor fragments in the periplasm of Escherichia coli. Influence of folding catalysts. J. Mol. Biol. 242, 655–669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wiener M. C., Horanyi P. S. (2011) How hydrophobic molecules traverse the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 10929–10930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hearn E. M., Patel D. R., van den Berg B. (2008) Outer-membrane transport of aromatic hydrocarbons as a first step in biodegradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 8601–8606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hearn E. M., Patel D. R., Lepore B. W., Indic M., van den Berg B. (2009) Transmembrane passage of hydrophobic compounds through a protein channel wall. Nature 458, 367–370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lepore B. W., Indic M., Pham H., Hearn E. M., Patel D. R., van den Berg B. (2011) Ligand-gated diffusion across the bacterial outer membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 10121–10126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Abumrad N., Harmon C., Ibrahimi A. (1998) Membrane transport of long-chain fatty acids: evidence for a facilitated process. J. Lipid Res. 39, 2309–2318 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wiener M. (2005) TonB-dependent outer membrane transport: going for Baroque? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 394–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Noinaj N., Guillier M., Barnard T. J., Buchanan S. K. (2010) TonB-dependent transporters: regulation, structure, and function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 43–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Stock J. B., Rauch B., Roseman S. (1977) Periplasmic space in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 7850–7861 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kniemeyer O., Heider J. (2001) Ethylbenzene dehydrogenase: a novel hydrocarbon-oxidizing molybdenum/iron-sulfur/heme enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21381–21386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Dermer J., Fuchs G. (2012) Molybdoenzyme that catalyzes the anaerobic hydroxylation of a tertiary carbon atom in the side-chain of cholesterol. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 36905–36916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kreit J., Sampson N. S. (2009) Cholesterol oxidase: physiological functions. FEBS J. 276, 6844–6856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tarlera S., Denner E. B. (2003) Sterolibacterium denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel cholesterol-oxidizing, denitrifying member of the β-Proteobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53, 1085–1091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chiang Y. R., Ismail W., Heintz D., Schaeffer C., Van Dorsselaer A., Fuchs G. (2008) Study of anoxic and oxic cholesterol metabolism by Sterolibacterium denitrificans. J. Bacteriol. 190, 905–914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Leu Y. L., Wang P. H., Shiao M. S., Ismail W., Chiang Y. R. (2011) A novel testosterone catabolic pathway in bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4447–4455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chiang Y. R., Ismail W., Müller M., Fuchs G. (2007) Initial steps in the anoxic metabolism of cholesterol by the denitrifying Sterolibacterium denitrificans. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 13240–13249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rudel L. L., Morris M. D. (1973) Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. J. Lipid Res. 14, 364–366 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Morikawa M., Daido H., Takao T., Murata S., Shimonishi Y., Imanaka T. (1993) A new lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by Arthrobacter sp. strain MIS38. J. Bacteriol. 175, 6459–6466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Walter V., Syldatk C., Hausmann R. (2010) Screening concepts for the isolation of biosurfactant producing microorganisms. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 672, 1–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rosenberg M., Gutnick D., Rosenberg E. (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 9, 29–33 [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mohn W. W., van der Geize R., Stewart G. R., Okamoto S., Liu J., Dijkhuizen L. (2008) The actinobacerial mce4 locus encodes a steroid transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35368–35374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chatfield C. H., Mulhern B. J., Burnside D. M., Cianciotto N. P. (2011) Legionella pneumophila LbtU acts as a novel, TonB-independent receptor for the legiobactin siderophore. J. Bacteriol. 193, 1563–1575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Osborn M. J., Gander J. E., Parisi E., Carson J. (1972) Mechanism of assembly of the outer membrane of Salmonella typhimurium: isolation and characterization of cytoplasmic and outer membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 3962–3972 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. de Maagd R. A., Lugtenberg B. (1986) Fractionation of Rhizobium leguminosarum cells into outer membrane, cytoplasmic membrane, periplasmic, and cytoplasmic components. J. Bacteriol. l67, 1083–1085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Keleti G., Lederer W. H. (eds) (1974) Handbook of Micromethods for the Biological Sciences. pp. 74–75, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York [Google Scholar]
- 43. Myers J. D., Kelly D. J. (2005) A sulphite respiration system in the chemoheterotrophic human pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology 151, 233–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Al-Tahhan R. A., Sandrin T. R., Bodour A. A., Maier R. M. (2000) Rhamnolipid-induced removal of lipopolysaccharide from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: effect on cell surface properties and interaction with hydrophobic substrates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3262–3268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zoueki C. W., Tufenkji N., Ghoshal S. (2010) A modified adhesion to hydrocarbons assay to account for the presence of hydrocarbon droplets. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 344, 492–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Mnif S., Chamkha M., Labat M., Sayadi S. (2011) Simultaneous hydrocarbon biodegradation and biosurfactant production by oilfield-selected bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 111, 525–536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Obuekwe C. O., Al-Jadi Z. K., Al-Saleh E. S. (2009) Hydrocarbon degradation in relation to cell-surface hydrophobicity among bacterial hydrocarbon degraders from petroleum-contaminated Kuwait desert environment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 63, 273–279 [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kaczorek E., Sałek K., Guzik U., Dudzińska-Bajorek B. (2013) Cell surface properties and fatty acids composition of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia under the influence of hydrophobic compounds and surfactants. N. Biotechnol. 30, 173–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Plesiat P., Aires J. R., Godard C., Köhler T. (1997) Use of steroids to monitor alternations in the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 179, 7004–7010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Yi S., Seth E. C., Men Y. J., Stabler S. P., Allen R. H., Alvarez-Cohen L., Taga M. E. (2012) Versatility in corrinoid salvaging and remodeling pathways supports corrinoid-dependent metabolism in Dehalococcoides mccartyi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 7745–7752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Birkenmaier A., Holert J., Erdbrink H., Moeller H. M., Friemel A., Schoenenberger R., Suter M. J., Klebensberger J., Philipp B. (2007) Biochemical and genetic investigation of initial reactions in aerobic degradation of the bile acid cholate in Pseudomonas sp. strain Chol1. J. Bacteriol. 189, 7165–7173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Swain K., Casabon I., Eltis L. D., Mohn W. W. (2012) Two transporters essential for reassimilation of novel cholate metabolites by Rhodococcus jostii RHA1. J. Bacteriol. 194, 6720–6727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kingston R. L., Scopes R. K., Baker E. N. (1996) The structure of glucose-fructose oxidoreductase from Zymomonas mobilis: an osmoprotective periplasmic enzyme containing non-dissociable NADP. Structure 4, 1413–1428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Tamaoka J., Ha D. M., Komagata K. (1987) Reclassification of Pseudomonas acidovorans den Dooren de Jong 1926 and Pseudomonas testosteroni Marcus and Talalay 1956 as Comamonas acidovorans comb. nov., and Comamonas testostersni comb. nov., with an emended description of the genus Comamonas. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 37, 52–59 [Google Scholar]
- 55. Watanabe M., Watanabe H. (1974) Periplasmic steroid-binding proteins and steroid transforming enzymes of Pseudomonas testosteroni. J. Steroid Biochem. 5, 439–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Villamón E., Villalba V., Nogueras M. M., Tomás J. M., Gozalbo D., Gil M. L. (2003) Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, a glycolytic enzyme present in the periplasm of Aeromonas hydrophila. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 84, 31–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ouellet H., Guan S., Johnston J. B., Chow E. D., Kells P. M., Burlingame A. L., Cox J. S., Podust L. M., de Montellano P. R. (2010) Mycobacterium tuberculosis CYP125A1, a steroid C27 monooxygenase that detoxifies intracellularly generated cholest-4-en-3-one. Mol. Microbiol. 77, 730–742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Adachi O., Ano Y., Toyama H., Matsushita K. (2007) in Modern Biooxidation, Enzymes, Reactions and Applications (Schmid R. D., Urlacher V. B., eds) pp. 1–41, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kunau W. H., Dommes V., Schulz H. (1995) β-Oxidation of fatty acids in mitochondria, peroxisomes, and bacteria: a century of continued progress. Prog. Lipid Res. 34, 267–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Chiang Y. R., Ismail W., Gallien S., Heintz D., Van Dorsselaer A., Fuchs G. (2008) Cholest-4-en-3-one-Δ1-dehydrogenase: a flavoprotein catalyzing the second step in anoxic cholesterol metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 107–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]