Table 4.
Scan | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 3 | Reader 4 | Reader 5 | Reader 6 | Reader 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
3 | 2b | 0 | 1 | 2a | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 2b | 0 | 0 | 2b | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 2a | 0 | 0 | 2b | 0 | 2a | 2b |
6 | 3 | 2b | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2b | 0 | 0 | 1 |
8 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
10 | 2a | 1 | 4 | 2b | 0 | 3 | 1 |
11 | 2b | 0 | 1 | 2b | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14 | 2b | 1 | 2b | 2b | 0 | 0 | 2a |
15 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
K-alpha for this inter-observer analysis (315 pairs of readings) is 0.60 (95 % CI = 0.53–0.66). 0 = No patency, 1 = contrast penetrates obstruction but minimal enters the distal artery, 2a = luminal patency of <50 % with partial filling (<half) of major branches, 2b = luminal patency of <50 % with partial filling (>half) of major branches, 3 = patency of >50 % of lumen and filling of most branches and 4 = complete patency