Skip to main content
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences
. 2013 Summer;4(3):140–146.

Micromorphological Evaluation of Dentin Treated with Different Desensitizing Agents

Deise Osmari 1, Ana Carolina de Oliveira Ferreira 1, Mariana de Carlo Bello 1, Alexandre Henrique Susin 2, Ana Cecília Correa Aranha 3, Marcela Marquezan 1, Bruno Lopes da Silveira 2
PMCID: PMC4295356  PMID: 25606322

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of a desensitizing agent is a permanent coating or filling of dentin surface. Morphological analysis in vitro of this treated surface is essential to understand the interaction between desensitizing agent and hypersensitive dentin. The aim was to evaluate the morphology of four dentin surface treated with desensitizing agents.

Methods: This was an in vitro laboratory study, where fifteen specimens from extracted human premolars were obtained. The enamel was removed to expose the dentin surface, polished with silicon carbide abrasive papers and etched with 6% citric acid for 2 min.The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups: G1 - without treatment (control) (C), G2 - fluoride varnish (FV), G3 - potassium oxalate (PO), G4 - 2-step self-etching adhesive system (AS), G5 - diode laser (DL). The specimens were cleaved in the lingual buccaldirection, prepared for analysis by Scanning Electron Microscope and the surface and interior of the dentinal tubules were observed at 1500× magnification.

Results: In the control group, the dentin etching promoted smear layer removal and exposure of dentinal tubules. In the group of fluoride varnish, a film was observed on the surface, with plugs of varnish into tubules. In the group of oxalate, partial obliteration of the tubular entrances was observed. In the group of the adhesive system, the tubules were obstructed through the formation of hybrid layer and a physical barrier on the surface. In the group of the diode laser, dentin melting and solidification with partial occlusion of dentinal tubules were observed.

Conclusions: All desensitizing agents evaluated demonstrated ability to modify the surface of dentin, with partial or total occlusion of dentinal tubules. Thus, it is suggested to do more clinical studies to verify the effectiveness of the findings.

Keywords: agents, dentin desensitizing, dentin, diode lasers

Introduction

The essential processes for the development of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) are concentrated in the exposure of dentin due to loss of enamel or cement, resulting in dentinal tubules being opened to their full extent1 , 2.

The action of desensitizing agents recommended for the treatment of DH takes into consideration the hydrodynamic theory3 that is based on the movement of fluid inside the dentinal tubules in response to iatrogenic or environmental trauma4.

Thus, the treatment possibilities are concentrated on changing or blocking the pulp nerve response and interruption of transmission of the stimulus, thereby reducing dentinal fluid movement by narrowing or occluding the dentinal tubules5 , 6. This occlusion, both mechanical and chemical leads to a reduction in dentin permeability7. This is possible by filling the tubules or by the combination of dentinal tubule elements and the precipitation of proteins.

Covering the surface is also one of the treatments for reducing DH, and can be performed by sealing the dentin with composites, glass ionomer cement, varnishes and dental adhesives. Other alternatives are surgery for coverage with gingival tissue, use of lasers or homeopathic medication, such as propolis, for example5 , 6.

The literature describes a large quantity of products, technique and equipment for the treatment of DH; however, there is still no consensus about the best form of treatment and management of this condition that appears so frequently in daily clinical practice.

Among the possible treatments for DH, the purpose of the present study was to verify, by means of scanning electron microscopy, the action of different desensitizing agents, such as fluoridated varnish, potassium oxalate, a self-etching adhesive system and high power diode laser on the surface morphology of dentin, to reach a greater understanding of the mechanisms of action with regard to their clinical application.

The hypothesis of the study was that all the therapies cause morphological alterations in dentin, capable of causing complete or partial occlusion of the dentinal tubules.

Methods

The research protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Brazil (CAAE: 0171. 0.243.000-10).

Fifteen specimens obtained from extracted human premolars provided by the UFSM Tooth Bank were used, the eligibility criteria being that they should be healthy. Teeth with defects, fractures and restorations were excluded.

The teeth were washed, cleaned and polished with a Robinson brush and pumice stone, stored in a 0.5% Thymol solution at room temperature to be disinfect, until they were used in the study.

Afterwards, enamel/dentin blocks were obtained from the cervical third on the vestibular face of the teeth, using a double-faced diamond disc (KG Sorensen, São Paulo, Brazil) fitted to a straight handpiece at low speed, under constant cooling. The enamel from the cervical region of each fragment was removed to expose the dentin, using a cutting machine (Labcut 1010, Extec Co, Enfield, USA) and polished with silicon carbide abrasive papers for 20s, of 400, 600, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2500 grit (3M do Brasil Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) to standardize the smear layer. The cuts were made in order to obtain blocks measuring 4 mm long x 4 mm wide, and a channel was made in the lingual region of specimens to guide their cleavage. The specimens were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath for 12 min8 and stored in deionized water up to the time of dentinal surface treatment.

All specimens were etched with 6% citric acid (Dermapelle Farmácia de Manipulação, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) for 2 min and washed with deionized water to remove the smear layer, in order to promote opening of the dentinal tubules.

The specimens were randomly distributed into five groups (n=3), and each specimen received a single application of the product. The studied groups were as follows: G1 – without treatment (control) (C); G2 – fluoridated varnish (FV); G3 - potassium oxalate (PO); G4 – 2-step self-etching adhesive system (AS); G5 – diode laser (DL). The composition, commercial brand and application modes are given in detail in Table 1.

Table 1. Composition and application mode of products and equipment used.

Material Chemical composition Application mode
Duraphat®‏ Colgate-Palmolive Company‏
(New York, USA)
5% Sodium fluoride, Colophonia, ethyl‏ alcohol, lacquer-gum, mastic gum,‏ saccharine, aroma, white beeswax Applied on the surface to be treated using a paint brush, and‏ allowed to harden with saliva.
Oxa-Gel‏ Kota Indústria e Comércio‏
Ltda (São Paulo, Brazil)
Monohydrated Potassium Oxalate,‏ carboxymethylcellulose, distilled‏ water, chlorhexidine, fluoride Applied on the dentin surface using a paint brush, allowed to‏ rest 10,11 for 2 minutes, and excess gel was removed.
ClearfilTM SE Bond‏ Kuraray‏ (Osaka, Japan) Primer: 10-MDP, HEMA, hydrophilic‏ dimethacrylate, water, catalyzer‏ Bond: 10-MDP, HEMA, microparticle‏ dimethacrylate monomer, catalyzer Primer applied with a paint brush for 20 seconds; dried with light‏ jet of air, Bond applied, excess removed and a delicate jet of air‏ applied; light polymerized for 10 seconds.
Thera Lase Surgery‏ DMC Equipamentos Ltda‏ (São Carlos, SP, Brazil)
Light Emitting Diode Laser;‏ Wavelength: 810 – 830 nm; Power‏ between 0.5 – 4.5W, delivery system‏ by fiber optic with diameter of (300‏ μm).
Irradiation was performed in non contact mode, at a distance‏ of 1mm from the dentin surface, with horizontal scanning‏ movements, for 20s. The protocol used was as follows: Power of‏ 1 W, continuous mode, energy 20J, generating an approximate‏ energy density of 100J/cm2 (calculated by the formula‏ D = J / π x r2; that is, 20J / 0.2cm2= 100J/cm2).

After the treatments, the specimens were cleaved with a sharp blade (dental chisel) perpendicularly to the vestibular surface, in the lingual-vestibular direction, in order to enable analysis of the surface and interior of the dentinal tubules.

The cleaved specimens were dried in an oven at 37°C for 12h99. After this the specimens were sputter coated with gold alloy in a Desk II Denton Vacuum sputter coater (Moorestown, NJ, USA) and observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Model Jeol A110- Jeol Inc. Tec. – Tokyo, Japan) at 1500× magnification. Photomicrographs were obtained for comparative morphological evaluation of the specimens in two directions: on the dentin surface and perpendicular to it (obtained by the method of specimen cleavage).

The images were qualitatively evaluated, considering the dentin surface characteristics, presence of deposits and condition of the dentinal tubules.

Results

The photomicrographs of the control group and groups treated with desensitizing agents are shown in Figures 1 to 5.

Figure 1.

Photomicrographs with reference to Group 1. Note the disoccluded dentinal tubules (1500×).

a.

a

b.

b

Figure 5.

Photomicrographs with reference to Group 5. Dentinal tubules were observed with partially occluded tubule entrances and irregular areas in the intertubular dentin (arrow) (5A). Dentin surface irregularities were also observed (arrow) (5B) (1500×).

a.

a

b.

b

In the control group that received only dentin etching with 6% citric acid for 2 min, it is possible to observe the exposed, dis-occluded dentinal tubules, without the presence of smear layer and smear plugs (Figures 1a and 1b).

In the 5% fluoridated varnish group, in the vestibular view, it is not possible to visualize the dentinal tubules, due to the presence of a film of varnish covering the entire surface (Figure 2a). When figure 2b was analyzed, infiltration of this film into some of the tubules is perceived, forming plugs of varnish.

Figure 2.

Photomicrographs with reference to Group 2. Note the varnish covering the entire dentin surface (2A) and some tubules with plugs of varnish (arrow) (2B) (1500×).

a.

a

b.

b

The potassium oxalate group presented a deposit of material partially occluding the entrances of dentinal tubules, when the surface was analyzed, and no continuous film was observed on the surface (Figure 3a). In Figure 3b, the presence of crystals of various diameters was perceived inside the tubules, formed in a band close to the dentinal surface.

Figure 3.

Photomicrographs with reference to Group 3. Note the partially occluded dentinal tubules (3A) and presence of crystals in the tubule (arrow) (3B) (1500×)

a.

a

b.

b

As regards the application of the two-sept selfetching adhesive system, a continuous and uniform film was seen on the dentinal surface, and it was not possible to find visible tubules (Figure 4a). When Figure 4b was analyzed, the formation of an resindentin interdiffusion zone (hybrid layer) was observed, as well as the presence of adhesive on the dentin, forming an approximately 15 μm thick film.

Figure 4.

Photomicrographs with reference to Group 4. The dentinal surface was observed to be completely covered by the adhesive (4A), with the formation of a hybrid layer (arrow) and adhesive film (a) (4B) (1500×).

a.

a

b.

b

The high power diode laser presented interaction with the dentinal substrate, with slight fusion and resolidification of the surface, with dentinal tubules with less defined margins and partially obliterated (Figure 5a). When Figure 5b was analyzed, dentin surface irregularity was perceived.

Discussion

Considering the greater prevalence of DH in the cervical regions of premolars 12 , 13, micromorphological evaluation of this region is fundamental for the understanding of the mechanism of action of desensitizing agents at their clinical application site, taking into account the trajectory of dentinal tubules. Morphological analysis from observation of the occlusion of the tubules is directly related to their permeability14.

In the present study, for the group in which no desensitizing therapy was applied, it was possible to perceive the removal of the smear layer and smear plugs, according to the pattern expected by etching the dentin with 6% citric acid for 2 min15 , 16. By simulating the opening of dentinal tubules in teeth with DH, the desensitizing action was verified under conditions similar to those found clinically1, since the presence of the smear layer over the dentinal tubules may contribute significantly to the reduction in DH17.

As regards the fluoridated varnish, the presence of a regular film over the dentin provides the site with an additional barrier18. Nevertheless, this film may easily be removed or displaced by washing the surface, leading to partial occlusion of the tubules and formation of an irregular layer, which may reflect a treatment without any effect in the long term 9. The mechanism of action expected from fluoridated compounds is explained by the chemical reaction of calcium fluoride with calcium ions from the dentinal fluid, enabling the formation of calcium fluoride crystals, thereby gradually diminishing the flow of fluid due to the reduction in tubule diameter19. The crystals may be presented with small diameters inside the tubule, and may not have a significant occlusive effect20, therefore clinical analysis of these compounds is necessary.

No crystal formation was observed in the specimens of the present study, which were evaluated immediately after application of the product. Thus, the presence of a film of varnish may play an important role in the reduction of pain, with plugs of the material being capable of penetrating into the tubule.

Potassium oxalate is characterized by the formation of crystals resulting from the combination of calcium ions from the dentinal fluid with oxalate10. The result of this chemical reaction is the precipitation of calcium oxalate crystals, which are insoluble in the face of acid challenge, at the tubule entrance and within it16 , 20. Arrais, Chan and Giannini8when performing SEM analysis of a specimen fractured in the lingualvestibular direction, observed that potassium oxalate promoted occlusion within the tubule, with the formation of some crystals with the same diameter as that of the dentinal tubule. In this study, there was no formation of a uniform film capable of sealing the dentin surface, as the excess superficial gel is removed on conclusion of the application time9. In addition to this occlusive effect, in vitro studies have shown that the presence of intratubular potassium ions may be related to desensitization of the intradental nerve, by inactivating the generation of the action potential, however, this effect is still inconclusive21.

The adhesive system used presented a superficial mechanical barrier capable of sealing the dentinal tubule orifices21 , 22. As regards the use of self-etching adhesive systems that do not remove the smear layer, and produce a smaller opening of dentinal tubules, one expects a reduction in dentin permeability23. The hybrid layer formed by these adhesives, as verified in the present study, has been shown to be thin, and due to the fact that the monomers penetrate into the tissue simultaneously to its demineralization, it favors a reduction in demineralized spaces not filled with adhesives24, which may generate discomfort and sensitivity.

Whereas fluoridated varnish, potassium oxalate and the adhesive system are, in some ways, deposited on the surface and within the tubules, the high power diode laser interacts with the dentinal substrate changing its morphology. This laser has been shown to be highly absorbed by pigmented tissues, it has shown weak interaction with mineralized structures, and is not capable of causing considerable morphological alterations, due to the coefficient of water absorption being low25 , 26. However, in the surfaces irradiated with the parameters proposed in this study, characteristics of fusion and resolidification of dentin were observed, and may contribute to a reduction in permeability in clinical application.

Haypek et al.27, when irradiating root surfaces with a power of 1.4 W, using the fiber optic in contact mode, found a modified smear layer, showing a surface with a smoother appearance, corresponding to fusion and resolidification, without the presence of open dentinal tubules, and with a temperature increase corresponding to safe limits. Whereas Kreisler et al.28 verified the morphological alterations with the fiber optic in contact mode, at angles of 90° and 10°, with irradiation time intervals of 10, 20 or 30 s for each specimen, and found no negative effects on the root surface with the use of powers of 0.5 and 1 W.

A morphological analysis comparing the effects of different high power lasers on the occlusion of dentinal tubules was performed by Gholami et al.25. The results of mean dentinal tubule diameter after irradiation with Er,Cr:YSGG; diode at 810 nm; CO2 and Nd:YAG were, 1.73; 3.27; 2.10 and 1.64 μm, respectively, in comparison with 3.52 μm before laser irradiation. The reduction in tubular diameter with the irradiation of all the lasers was considered statistically significant (p<0.05), and with the use of diode laser, slight fusion and peritubular and intertubular dentin irregularity was observed. However, it is known that the light-dentin interaction may be influenced by the physical and chemical properties of dentin, which vary from tooth to tooth, and therefore, cannot be controlled experimentally29.

Therefore, the in vitro morphological evaluation of the dentin surface treated with desensitizing agents is the first stage in the understanding of the interaction of these agents with dentin. Further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the behavior of these materials in the face of the challenges of dietary and toothbrushing habits, to verify their effectiveness over the course of time.

Conclusions

All the desensitizing agents used in this study were shown to be effective in occluding the dentinal tubules, with different mechanisms of action.

Please cite this article as follows:

Osmari D, de Oliveira Ferreira AC, de Carlo Bello M, Susin AH, Correa Aranha AC, Marquezan M, da Silveira BL. Micromorphological Evaluation of Dentin Treated with Different Desensitizing Agents: J Lasers Med Sci 2013; 4(3):140-6

References

  • 1.Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivityA study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:280–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1987.tb01533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity. Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity . J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(4):221–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:990–8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod. 1986;12(10):453–7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Al-Sabbagh M, Brown A, Thomas MV. In-Office Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am. 2009;53:47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(3):212–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dowell P, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity – a review Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10:341–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1983.tb01283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arrais CAG, Chan DCN, Giannini M. Effects of desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(2):144–8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000200012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oda M, Matos AB, Liberti EA. Morfologia da dentina tratada com substâncias dessensibilizantes: avaliação através da microscopia eletrônica de Varredura. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1999;13:337–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aranha ACC, Pimenta LAF, Marchi GM. Clinical evaluation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(3):333–9. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000300018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Assis JS, Rodrigues LKA, Fonteles CSR, Colares RCR, Souza AMB, Santiago SL. Dentin Hypersensitivity After Treatment With Desensitizing Agents: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Mouth Clinical Trial. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):157–61. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kehua Q, Yingying F, Hong S, Menghong W, Deyu H, Xu F. A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China. Int Dent J. 2009;59(6):376–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rees JS, Addy M. A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:997–1003. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fu B, Shen Y, Wang H, Hannig M. Sealing Ability of Dentin Adhesives/Desensitizer. Oper Dent. 2007;32(5):496–503. doi: 10.2341/06-143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mordan NJ, Barber PM, Gillam DG. The dentine discA review of its applicability as a model for the in vitro testing of dentine hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:148–56. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.d01-260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pereira JC, Martineli ACBF, Tung MS. Replica of Human Dentin Treated With Different Desensitizing Agents: A Methodological SEM Study In Vitro. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):75–85. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402002000200001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chidchuangchai W, Vongsavan N, Matthews B. Sensory transduction mechanisms responsible for pain caused by cold stimulation of dentine in man. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52:154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ritter AV, Dias WL, Miguez P, Caplan DJ, Swift Jr EJ. Treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish A randomized clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1013–20. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar NG, Mehta DS. Short-Term Assessment of the Nd:YAG Laser With and Without Sodium Fluoride Varnish in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity – A Clinical and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. J Periodontol. 2005;76(7):1140–7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG. Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments – an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2005;21(2):129–38. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Orchardson R, Gillam DG. The Efficacy of Potassium Salts as Agents for Treating Dentin Hypersensitivity. J Orofac Pain. 2000;14(1):9–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Kilic I, Yucel T, Ozel S. The efficacy of three desensitizing agents used to treat dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:285–96. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Hybridization quality in cervical cementum and superficial dentin using current adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24(5):584–93. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Arrais CAG, Giannini M. Morphology and thickness of the diffusion of resin through demineralized or unconditioned dentinal matrix. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2002;16(2):115–20. doi: 10.1590/s1517-74912002000200004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gholami GA, Fekrazad R, Esmaiel-Nejad A, Kalhori KAM. An Evaluation of the Occluding Effects of Er;Cr:YSGG, Nd:YAG, CO2 and Diode Lasers on Dentinal Tubules: A Scanning Electron Microscope In Vitro Study . Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29(2):115–21. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Theodoro LH, Haypek P, Bachmann L, Garcia VG, Sampaio JE, Zezell DM. et al. Effect of Er:YAG and Diode Laser Irradiation on the Root Surface: Morphological and Thermal Analysis. J Periodontol. 2003;74(6):838–43. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.6.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haypek P, Zezell DM, Bachmann L, Marques MM. Interaction Between High-power Diode Laser and Dental Root SurfaceThermal, Morphological and Biocompatibility Analysis. J Oral Laser Appl. 2006;6:101–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kreisler M, Al Haj H, Daubländer M, Götz H, Duschner H, Willershausen B. et al. Effect of Diode Laser Irradiation on Root Surfaces in Vitro. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002;20(2):63–9. doi: 10.1089/104454702753768034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zapletalová Z, Perina J Jr, Novotny R, Chmelícková H. Suitable Conditions for Sealing of Open Dentinal Tubules Using a Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(6):495–9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES