Skip to main content
Integrative and Comparative Biology logoLink to Integrative and Comparative Biology
. 2014 Jun 12;54(6):1072–1083. doi: 10.1093/icb/icu070

Validation of Hill-Type Muscle Models in Relation to Neuromuscular Recruitment and Force–Velocity Properties: Predicting Patterns of In Vivo Muscle Force

Andrew A Biewener *,1, James M Wakeling , Sabrina S Lee †,‡, Allison S Arnold *
PMCID: PMC4296201  PMID: 24928073

Abstract

We review here the use and reliability of Hill-type muscle models to predict muscle performance under varying conditions, ranging from in situ production of isometric force to in vivo dynamics of muscle length change and force in response to activation. Muscle models are frequently used in musculoskeletal simulations of movement, particularly when applied to studies of human motor performance in which surgically implanted transducers have limited use. Musculoskeletal simulations of different animal species also are being developed to evaluate comparative and evolutionary aspects of locomotor performance. However, such models are rarely validated against direct measures of fascicle strain or recordings of muscle–tendon force. Historically, Hill-type models simplify properties of whole muscle by scaling salient properties of single fibers to whole muscles, typically accounting for a muscle’s architecture and series elasticity. Activation of the model’s single contractile element (assigned the properties of homogenous fibers) is also simplified and is often based on temporal features of myoelectric (EMG) activation recorded from the muscle. Comparison of standard one-element models with a novel two-element model and with in situ and in vivo measures of EMG, fascicle strain, and force recorded from the gastrocnemius muscles of goats shows that a two-element Hill-type model, which allows independent recruitment of slow and fast units, better predicts temporal patterns of in situ and in vivo force. Recruitment patterns of slow/fast units based on wavelet decomposition of EMG activity in frequency–time space are generally correlated with the intensity spectra of the EMG signals, the strain rates of the fascicles, and the muscle–tendon forces measured in vivo, with faster units linked to greater strain rates and to more rapid forces. Using direct measures of muscle performance to further test Hill-type models, whether traditional or more complex, remains critical for establishing their accuracy and essential for verifying their applicability to scientific and clinical studies of musculoskeletal function.


Over the prior three decades, Hill-type muscle models have gained broad use for assessing the functions of muscles across different movements and for analyzing changes that occur, for example, with aging, neuromuscular-related diseases, or rehabilitation from injury (Anderson and Pandy 2003; Thelen 2003; Fox et al. 2009; Hamner et al. 2010; Hall et al. 2011; Peterson et al. 2011). In large part this reflects their use in studies of human motor performance, for which surgically-implanted transducers to assess muscle function are challenging and have limited use. Consequently, despite considerable progress incorporating Hill-type models into simulations of walking, running, and other dynamic movements (Delp et al. 2007), the accuracy of in vivo muscle forces predicted by these models largely remains unknown. Musculoskeletal simulations that rely on Hill-type models are also being developed to evaluate comparative and evolutionary aspects of the locomotor performances of different animal species (Full and Ahn 1995; Kargo et al. 2002; Rankin et al. [2014]) as well as to infer the locomotor capability of fossil taxa (Hutchinson and Garcia 2002). We review here past work that has attempted to validate Hill-type muscle models and the recruitment patterns of slow versus fast motor units derived from wavelet-decomposition techniques (von Tscharner 2000; Wakeling and Syme 2002; Wakeling and Rozitis 2004) in relation to muscle force and work. We also review our own efforts to develop improved Hill-type models validated against forces and fascicle strains measured from the lateral (LG) and medial (MG) gastrocnemius muscles of goats across differing locomotor conditions.

Validation of Hill-type models against in vivo measurements is critical for improving their predictive accuracy and for establishing the reliability of simulations that depend on them for studies relevant to human health and comparative locomotive performance. Hill-type models characterize the force generated by a fiber as a function of its activation and its instantaneous length and velocity. The force–length (F–L) and force–velocity (F–V) properties of the muscle often are based on data combined from studies of different muscles in different animal species. Limited, and largely indirect, data are available for human muscles. In cases for which F–L and F–V data are obtained from ectothermic species (e.g., frog or toad), the properties must be adjusted by estimates of thermal effects on contractile performance of muscles in endothermic species. To represent the whole muscle, the properties of a single fiber are scaled to represent the whole muscle, typically accounting for the muscle’s architecture and series elasticity. Despite these simplifying limitations, Hill-type models are widely adopted for clinical applications due to their computational efficiency and relative simplicity. However, traditional formulations of Hill-type models have limitations that diminish their accuracy, particularly when assessing in vivo motor tasks that involve time-varying, submaximal contractions.

A few previous in situ studies have examined the accuracy of time-varying muscle forces predicted by Hill-type models. For example, Sandercock and Heckman (1997) examined whether a traditional Hill-type model could predict the forces generated by the cat soleus in situ, imposing length changes and near-tetanic stimulation corresponding to slow-speed locomotion. Their model reproduced measurements of in vivo force to within 10% of maximal tension when force was rising but overestimated force by 30% during relaxation. In a related experiment, Perreault et al. (2003) evaluated a Hill-type model of the same muscle via the cross-extension reflex pathway, also imposing length changes corresponding to locomotion. This study revealed root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) in force that were greater than 50% when motor unit firing rates were low (10–20 Hz), the rates most relevant to natural movements. These and other studies, for example, van Ingen Schenau et al. (1988), including our own work (e.g., Wakeling et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2013b), have confirmed that Hill-type models are sensitive to assumptions about activation and the implications of these assumptions. Intrinsic properties, in particular F–V properties, contribute greatly to the errors in force predicted by these models (Perreault et al. 2003).

The work we review here is directed toward improving the accuracy with which a muscle’s force and work output (force × fascicle length change) during movement can be estimated both for clinical applications and for studies directed at understanding the comparative and evolutionary significance of variations in muscle architecture and musculoskeletal organization. Our work tests the hypothesis that a two-element Hill-type model, which allows for independent and time-varying recruitment of slow and fast contractile elements, predicts the time course of force rise, the peak force, and the time course of force relaxation more accurately than traditional one-element models across varying locomotor conditions.

Our work also seeks to evaluate whether the F–V properties of a muscle are affected by submaximal recruitment of either slow-fiber or fast-fiber fractions of the muscle.

Materials and methods

Six African pygmy goats (Capra hircus L; three males, three females; mass 25.85 ± 6.20 kg) were tested at Harvard University’s Concord Field Station. The experimental protocol involved four main steps over a 3-day period: Surgical implantation of transducers, in vivo testing, surgical implantation of nerve cuffs, and in situ testing. Details of these protocols are described elsewhere (Lee et al. 2011, 2013a; Wakeling et al. 2012) and are reviewed here in brief.

Collection of experimental data

Goats were trained to walk, trot, and gallop on a treadmill on level and inclined grades. Varying the speed of the treadmill during level locomotion elicited the most pronounced differences in recruitment (Lee et al. 2013a). Thus, trials in which goats walked, trotted, and galloped on the level grade were used to test the different models. Prior to testing, the MG and LG muscles were each instrumented with three pairs of fine-wire offset twist silver myoelectric (EMG) activation electrodes (California Fine Wire, Inc.) to measure excitation (Lee et al. 2011) and a pair of 2.0 mm sonomicrometry crystals (Sonometrics, Inc.) to measure fascicle length at mid-belly (resolution = 0.3 µm; Gillis et al. 2005). A custom-fabricated “E”-shaped buckle force transducer (Biewener and Baudinette 1995; McGuigan et al. 2009) was used to measure force at the Achilles tendon (post-mortem calibrations yielded r2 > 0.99). Lead wires from all transducers were fed through a subcutaneous tunnel to a connector that was sutured to the skin proximal to the hip. Animals received post-operative analgesia (buprenorphine 0.1–0.5 mg/kg, subcutaneously) during a 24-h recovery period. No animals showed signs of post-operative infection (no antibiotics were administered).

In vivo lateral and medial tendon forces were estimated from the total in vivo tendon force, measured by the single force buckle on the tendon, using the ratio of the maximum lateral and medial forces measured from isolated in situ recordings from two tendon buckles (see below). Tendon forces were normalized by the maximum force, Fmax, recorded during trotting on the incline, consistent with previous analyses (Lee et al. 2013b).

In vivo data were recorded at 5000 Hz while goats walked, trotted, and galloped on the treadmill (Lee et al. 2013b). EMG signals were amplified (gain of 100–1000) and recorded with minimal filtering (bandpass 30–3000 Hz, notch at 60 Hz using P511J amplifiers; Grass Technologies). Between 15 and 20 strides were recorded for each condition. Sufficient rest was given between trials to ensure that the goats could perform steadily at each speed and gait.

Following completion of the in vivo experiments, the goats were deeply anesthetized (isoflurane to effect) and the tibial component of the sciatic nerve exposed and isolated deep to the biceps femoris muscle. Tripolar nerve cuff electrodes (constructed of silver wire and silastic tubing) were then placed on isolated bundles of the tibial nerve innervating the LG and on those innervating the MG. The electrodes were constructed to provide both stimulating and blocking impulses to the nerve (see Wakeling and Syme [2002] and Lee et al. [2011] for further details). The blocking electrode was located distal to the stimulating electrode, and a 1000-Hz blocking stimulus used to preferentially excite slower motor units and to block fast units. The peroneal nerve was cut to prevent reflex feedback. An additional force transducer was surgically attached on the medial portion of the Achilles tendon.

To carry out in situ recordings of the muscles’ forces and lengths under twitch and tetanic conditions, each animal was placed on its right side whereas its left hind limb was secured in a customized stereotactic frame (80/20 Inc.) using stainless steel bone pins inserted into the femur and tibia. The animal and muscles were kept warm with a heating pad and heat lamp, with temperatures recorded by a thermistor and maintained at 33 ± 2°C. In situ recordings were made to measure the muscles’ active and passive force–length relationships using tetanic stimulation (supramaximal: 1.5 × the voltage required to elicit maximal isometric force) for a range of ankle angles. The tibial nerve was stimulated under computer control (Labview 7.1; National Instruments Corp; A320R, World Precision Instruments). A series of different nerve-stimulation protocols were used to elicit twitches from different populations of motor units, thereby enabling identification of the twitch profiles for both slow and fast motor units (see Lee et al. [2011] for details).

EMG analysis of motor recruitment

To extract information about the motor units recruited during walking, trotting, and galloping, the spectral properties of the EMG signals corresponding to signals from slow motor units and from fast motor units were identified using wavelet analysis (von Tscharner 2000; Wakeling and Rozitis 2004; Lee et al. 2011); this technique allowed different frequency bands (101–1857 Hz) represented in the EMG signals to be identified as functions of time. Major features of the EMG intensity spectra associated with recordings from the goats’ LG and MG muscles were identified using principal components (PCs) analysis (Fig. 1). Reconstruction of the spectra from the PC weightings and their loading scores showed that the majority (75–97%) of the EMG signal for any given spectrum could be reconstructed using the first two principal components (I and II). PCI loading scores provide a measure of the total EMG intensity, whereas PCII loading scores relative to PCI loading scores provide a measure of the relative frequency content within the signal (Wakeling 2004; Hodson-Tole and Wakeling 2007).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic showing (A) principal component (I and II) weightings across the frequency spectra of a wavelet-decomposed EMG signal and (B) PCI loading score plotted against PCII loading score. The example vectors show PCI versus PCII loading scores when slow motor units are predominantly recruited (large θ, negative PCII loading) and when fast motor units are primarily recruited (low θ, positive PCII loading). (C) Center frequencies of the optimized wavelets derived from EMG recordings (Lee et al. 2011). (D) Using these optimized wavelets, raw EMG signals recorded from the MG muscles of goats during walking on the incline and galloping on the level, for example, can be decomposed to show that faster motor units are recruited at higher intensities during galloping than during walking. In each plot, the data corresponding to slower and faster motor units are differentiated as rectified signals.

To quantify the contributions of high-frequency versus low-frequency content within the EMG signal, we calculated the angle (θ), formed by plotting the PCI loading score against the PCII loading score (Fig. 1; Wakeling 2004; Wakeling and Rozitis 2004; Hodson-Tole and Wakeling 2007). Small values of θ have a positive PCII contribution and indicate a relatively large high-frequency content, whereas large values of θ have a negative PCII contribution and indicate a relatively large low-frequency content (Fig. 1B). On this basis, we used the angle θ to assess patterns of motor unit recruitment. To identify recruitment patterns directly from the raw EMG signals, optimized wavelets were derived, yielding center frequencies for slow (242.3 Hz) and faster motor units (532.7 Hz) (Wakeling 2004; Hodson-Tole and Wakeling 2008; Lee et al. 2011).

Evaluation of Hill-type muscle models

The muscles’ activations derived from the EMG recordings were used to test the predictive accuracy of a novel, two-element Hill-type model against in vivo measurements (see Fig. 2) of muscle force and fascicle strain (normalized by optimal fascicle length). Three simpler one-element models were also examined: (1) A homogenous model, which estimates muscle force using average properties of the fibers corresponding to slow and fast motor units; (2) a hybrid model, which estimates muscle force using the maximum shortening velocity of the fast motor units and a F–V curvature that is weighted based on the proportion of slow and fast fibers; and (3) an orderly recruitment model, which assumes that the active muscle displays intrinsic properties of progressively faster motor units as activation levels increase. In this model, active fibers are assigned the intrinsic properties of slow fibers at low activation. This model is based on classical studies of orderly recruitment during steady stretch reflexes (Henneman et al. 1974) and follows previous modeling approaches (van Soest and Bobbert 1993; Umberger et al. 2003).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Representative in vivo patterns of total rectified EMG intensity, force, and fascicle strain (normalized by optimal length) for the LG (A–C) and MG (D–F) of goats across different locomotor tasks, normalized over a full stride. Gait and grade are denoted by varying shades of gray, as indicated. These patterns match those recorded previously from goats during in vivo locomotor activities (McGuigan et al. 2009).

The inputs to each model included the time-varying fascicle lengths, which were also used to calculated fiber contractile velocity and pennation angle, and the activations states. To drive the muscle models, the EMG intensities were used as excitations for a series of coupled first-order differential equations, constituting transfer functions (Lee et al. 2011) that enabled estimation of the activation level of each muscle. Activation levels were normalized to the maximum activation during incline trotting, consistent with our procedure for normalizing the measured tendon forces. Transfer functions were derived for the whole muscle, the slower motor units, and the faster motor units using in situ data pooled from the six goats (see Lee et al. 2011). For further details regarding muscle architecture and fascicle strain inputs to the models, and the means by which slow and fast motor units where characterized, see Lee et al. (2013). All simulations were run using Mathematic (Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL, USA).

For the three one-element models (homogenous, hybrid, and orderly), the active component of the muscle fiber force was given by:

graphic file with name icu070m1.jpg (1)

where a(t) is the time-varying level of activation (Lee et al. 2011), normalized to the maximum activation measured during the in vivo experiments (Lee et al. 2013b), and Fa(l) is the active force–length relationship, normalized to a maximum of 1 and determined from in situ tetanic FL measurements. Fiber length (l) and contractile velocity (v) also varied with time (t).

The two-element model incorporated independently-activated slow and fast contractile elements in parallel (Wakeling et al. 2012). The EMG intensities at the low-frequency and high-frequency bands (determined from the EMG signals and optimized wavelets) were used with the transfer functions to estimate the activation levels for the slow and fast elements, aslow(t) and afast(t), respectively. The active component of the total muscle fiber force was thus given by:

graphic file with name icu070m2.jpg (2)

where Ff,slow and Ff,fast are the normalized forces for slow and fast fibers, respectively, as determined from Equation (1) using fiber-specific values of a(t), v0 (the maximum unloaded shortening velocity), and FV curvature (see Lee et al. [2013b] for further details).

For the one-element models, whole muscle force was estimated from the active fiber force as follows:

graphic file with name icu070m3.jpg (3)

where Ff is the active component of the fiber force (Equation (1)) and Fp is the passive component of force as a function of fiber length (l), as measured in situ. Constant c (peak isometric force measured for each muscle) and pennation angle (α) scaled the fiber force to the muscle. By comparison, whole muscle force generated by the two-element model was estimated from the active fiber forces generated by the independently-activated slow and fast contractile elements:

graphic file with name icu070m4.jpg (4)

Pennation angle was calculated at each time step from the resting pennation angle and the fascicle length, assuming that the thickness of the muscle remained constant (Zajac 1989; Millard et al. 2013). The inputs to each model included the time-varying fascicle lengths measured by sonomicrometry, which were also used to calculate the fiber contractile velocity, the pennation angle, and the activation levels.

Because muscle models are generally sensitive to the maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Wakeling et al. 2012), two sets of values for vo were tested: One set used values (2.74 and 3.59 lopt s1 for slower and faster fibers) estimated from in situ measures of activation rates scaled by literature values across a range of species (Lee et al. 2013b); the other set used values (5 and 10 lopt s1 for the slow and fast fibers) based on previous models of larger species (Wakeling et al. 2012). The F–V relationship was characterized by its curvature, k, which depended on fiber type (Otten 1987). In the two-element model, we used curvature values of 0.18 and 0.29 for slow fibers and fast fibers, respectively (Wakeling et al. 2012). In the one-element models, we used an intermediate value of k to represent muscles with mixed fiber types. Values for all parameters in the models are given elsewhere (Lee et al. 2011, 2013b).

Statistics

Simulations were run for the different model formulations (4), goats (6), muscles (2), EMG electrodes (3), gaits (3), assumed fiber-type proportions (2), and sets of v0 values (2) using custom software (Mathematica Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL, USA). Differences between the predicted forces and the measured forces (normalized to the maximum force measured in vivo, for each goat, during trotting on the incline) were characterized by the coefficient of determination (r2) and by the RMSE. To determine whether r2 and RMSE differed among goats, models, LG and MG muscles, type of gait, fiber-type proportion, and v0, we used a general linear model repeated-measures multi-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the following independent variables: goat (random), models, muscles, gait, fiber-type proportion, and v0. Statistical differences were considered significant at the α = 0.05 level. Tukey post-hoc analyses were conducted to identify significant differences between levels within a factor, as appropriate. All statistical tests were conducted using Minitab Statistical Software (Minitab, Inc., State College, PA, USA).

Results

The LG and MG showed similar patterns of EMG activity in relation to measurements of fascicle strain and muscle–tendon force across different gaits, speeds, and grades (Fig. 2). In both muscles, EMG intensity increased significantly with increased speed on the level and was greatest during trotting on the incline (Lee et al. 2013a). LG and MG forces paralleled the changes in EMG intensity, increasing with locomotor speed and grade and indicating a correlated increase in muscle force with increased motor recruitment. LG fascicles and MG fascicles both shortened to produce work for most of limb support during walking, trotting, and galloping. Normalized shortening rates of LG fascicles ranged from an average of −0.98 lopt s1 during level walking to −2.02 lopt s1 during uphill trotting over the concentric phase of muscle force production; shortening rates of MG fascicles similarly ranged from −1.09 lopt s1 during level walking to −1.67 lopt s1 during uphill trotting (Lee et al. 2013a).

Measurements of motor unit recruitment, derived from wavelet decomposition of the EMG recordings in frequency–time space (Fig. 3A), showed that the LG was preferentially recruited at faster speeds on the level surface, particularly at a gallop, whereas MG was recruited more strongly on the inclined surface (Fig. 3B). Additionally, the LG showed greater recruitment of fast units (lower θ) compared with the MG, consistent with its greater percentage of fast versus slow fibers (myosin I: 31.0 ± 2.6%; myosin IIa: 69.0 ± 2.6%) compared with the MG (myosin I: 49.4 ± 4.7%; myosin IIa: 50.6 ± 4.7%; n = 5) (Fig. 4). Neither muscle expressed myosin IIb or IIx fibers (J. A. Carr, M. Miara, and A. A. Biewener, unpublished data). The frequency content of the EMG signals recorded from the LG during locomotion on the level was significantly associated with the fascicle shortening velocity, the rate of force rise, and the rate of force relaxation (Lee et al. 2013b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(A) Principal component (I and II) loading scores obtained from our analysis, following wavelet decomposition, of EMG signals recorded from goats’ LG and MG muscles during locomotion. In combination, PCI and PCII explain about 76% of the EMG signals recorded from the muscles. (B) PCI loading score plotted against PCII loading score for the MG (solid) and LG (dashed) during the stance phase of different locomotor tasks, as indicated by the different symbols. Angle θ quantifies the contribution of low-frequency versus high-frequency content in the EMG signal (smaller values of θ indicate higher-frequency content). Results are from Lee et al. (2013a).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Light micrograph (400× mag.) of portions of the goat LG and MG muscles stained immunohistochemically for type IIa (fast oxidative-glycolytic) myosin-specific antibody. Light fibers express type I (slow-oxidative) myosin. No fibers in either the LG or MG of goats stained for myosin type IIx or type IIb. From J. A. Carr, M. Miara, and A. A. Biewener (unpublished data).

We tested the ability of a novel two-element Hill-type model, which allows independent activation of slow and fast contractile elements over time, to predict the patterns of force rise and relaxation that we measured in vivo. We also tested three traditional one-element models (homogenous, hybrid, and orderly). The three one-element models predicted force magnitudes and rates of rise and relaxation that were not significantly different (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Consequently, the following results focus on a comparison of the one-element orderly recruitment model with the two-element model.

The two-element model and (all of) the one-element models that we tested generally captured the detailed changes in MG and LG forces measured in vivo (Fig. 5) during walking, trotting, and galloping. However, all models exhibited errors that included inaccurate estimates of the peak forces developed by the muscles and, in particular, insufficient rates of force rise and decline. Across all models, the RMSE (as a percentage of the maximum in vivo force measured during trotting on the incline) ranged from 17.0% to 32.2% for the LG and from 9.6% to 15.5% for the MG (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Normalized forces recorded in vivo from goats’ LG and MG across different gaits (walking, trotting, and galloping) compared with those predicted by an orderly recruitment one-element model and by a two-element model. These are representative data with r2 and RMSE values that are similar to the mean r2 and RMSE values of all the simulations. Muscle–tendon forces were normalized relative to those recorded during trotting on a slope. Average changes in force over time are shown. Original data reported by Lee et al. (2013b).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

RMSEs of the LG and MG forces predicted by the one-element and two-element models (expressed as a percentage of the maximum in vivo force measured during trotting on an incline). Values are the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6 goats). The two-element model was assigned vo values of 5 and 10 lopt s−1 for the slow and fast fibers, respectively, and a proportion of 75% fast fibers. The one-element and two-element models showed significant differences (denoted by horizontal bars with the indicated P-value) as determined by post-hoc Tukey tests. Original data reported by Lee et al. (2013b).

Across the different gaits examined, the two-element model generally performed better than the one-element models. In particular, the two-element model predicted time-varying LG forces with statistically higher r2 (better correlation) and lower RMSE (less error) than did the orderly one-element model, both during galloping (r2, P = 0.03; RMSE, P = 0.001; Tukey post-hoc test) and during trotting (RMSE, P < 0.001; Fig. 6). The two-element model also predicted time-varying MG forces with significantly lower RMSE than did the orderly one-element model during trotting and galloping (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01; Fig. 6). No differences were observed in terms of r2 or RMSE for walking.

ANOVA revealed that the accuracy of predicted in vivo force was dependent on the muscle, the gait, and the choice of v0 for the models. The models generally predicted force more accurately for the MG than for the LG, with higher r2 and lower RMSE for walking and galloping (P < 0.001). Adjusting v0 significantly influenced the accuracy of the predicted LG forces (r2, P < 0.001), with the faster values of 5 and 10 lopts1 providing a better fit (mean r2 = 0.37) than the experimentally-determined set of v0 of 2.74 and 3.59 lopts1 (mean r2 = 0.34). The performance of the models also differed significantly across the different gaits (r2, P < 0.001; RMSE, P < 0.001; Fig. 6).

Discussion

The work reviewed here provides the first attempt to validate Hill-type muscle models against directly measured in vivo muscle forces and extends earlier work (Sandercock and Heckman 1997; Perreault et al. 2003) to test Hill-type models using measurements of in situ force. Comparisons of force patterns predicted from the models and measured in vivo show generally good agreement in the overall patterns and magnitudes of goats’ MG and LG forces across different gaits. However, errors in peak force and, in particular, errors in the rates of force rise and decline are apparent in the forces predicted from the models relative to those measured in vivo. Interestingly, the predicted rise in force matches the measured in vivo force more accurately during locomotion at slower speeds (walking), whereas the predicted decline in force matches the in vivo force more accurately during locomotion at faster speeds (e.g., galloping) (Fig. 5). Such inaccuracies in force rise and decline, relative to the length changes of muscle fibers, will affect calculations of work and power produced by a muscle over the course of a stride. Our past work (Wakeling et al. 2012) of testing these models against in situ data also indicates that the accuracy of a Hill-type model's predictions is particularly susceptible to values of shortening velocity used in the model. Inaccurate predictions of force development and relaxation will, therefore, affect the ability of muscle models to predict the time-varying forces required to control prosthetic devices and to develop reliable therapies for gait rehabilitation, as well as to provide reliable inferences regarding the musculoskeletal design and function of extinct animals.

Nevertheless, the generally accurate fit of force magnitude and timing achieved by Hill-type models relative to measured in vivo forces, as demonstrated here for the LG and MG muscles of goats, is encouraging. In cases for which muscle forces and the movements they produce and control cannot be determined directly (as in studies of human muscle function, or studies of proximal limb muscles in animals that do not allow measurements of in vivo muscle force, or paleontological inferences of fossil taxa), muscle models that can be incorporated into musculoskeletal simulations hold considerable potential for assessing the functional attributes of musculoskeletal design. Our results indicate that Hill-type muscle models, whether traditional or more complex, can provide estimates of muscle force that achieve an accuracy with RMSEs, as observed here, ranging from 17.0% to 32.2% for the goat LG and from 9.6% to 15.5% for the goat MG (Fig. 6).

Although the three different one-element models all provide reasonably accurate fits to time-varying force, our two-element model that allows independent activation of slow and fast contractile elements shows an improved fit to time-varying force with RMSEs that were significantly diminished during trotting and galloping (but not during walking) (Fig. 6). Nevertheless, both a two-element model that considers independent recruitment of slow and fast motor units and the more traditional one-element models tested retain significant error in the rates of force development and relaxation that they predict (Fig. 5). Such errors likely can be reduced by refining measurements of the contractile properties (intrinsic shortening velocity, F–V curvature, and history-dependent F–L effects) used in the models. A key limitation of our studies was our reliance on in situ measurements of twitch force rise and relaxation rates, rather than determining F–V properties and vo directly for goat MG and LG muscles. Our past work (Wakeling et al. 2012) indicates that the accuracy of a Hill-type model’s predictions is particularly susceptible to values of vo. When validating our muscle models against in vivo data, we obtained better fits when we used higher values of vo than when we used those values estimated from our in situ twitch data (Lee et al. 2013b).

Additionally, in recent studies that analyzed the effects of differential, submaximal recruitment of slow versus fast motor units of the rat plantaris muscle in situ (Holt et al. 2014), we found that the muscle’s F–V properties were most strongly affected by the fraction of motor units activated, rather than by whether the activated fraction of the muscle was comprised of mainly slow or mainly fast motor units. The maximum shortening velocity of the muscle as well as its F–V curvature was greatest when the entire muscle was activated; these attributes were reduced significantly when either the muscle’s faster motor units or slower motor units were activated alone. Force rise time also was significantly longer when the whole muscle was activated than when only the slow fraction or the fast fraction was activated. These results indicate that significant inertial, viscous, and elastic effects operate, in addition to motor unit recruitment, and influence the output of the whole muscle. Recent studies of frog and turkey muscles also show important interactions between the contractile and series elastic elements of a muscle–tendon unit (Azizi et al. 2008; Azizi and Roberts 2010) that affect the operating length, velocity, and net power output of the muscle’s fibers.

A more rapid rate of force development but slower rate of muscle shortening, as evidenced by our studies of the rat plantaris when fractional portions of the muscle (whether slow or fast) are recruited (Holt et al. 2014), suggests that such effects likely underlie the limitations of our models of goat muscles to predict accurately in vivo force rise and relaxation rates. Under most in vivo conditions, muscles are submaximally activated. Thus, although inertial, viscous, and elastic effects are challenging to assess, such effects in addition to time-varying recruitment patterns of slow versus fast motor units will need to be incorporated into future phenomenological Hill-type muscle models. Additionally, more accurate and realistic architectural features of muscles, particularly those that allow for muscle bulging and that account for muscle gearing (Azizi et al. 2008; Wakeling et al. 2011), will need to be incorporated, as these features will help to model the contractile behavior of whole muscle based on scaled properties of slow and fast muscle fibers. Finally, further validation of muscle models against direct measures of muscle performance in vivo will remain critical for evaluating their accuracy and their reliability for application to studies of musculoskeletal function.

Differences in architecture, fiber composition, and intrinsic motor unit properties of the LG and MG muscles (Maganaris et al. 1998; Wakeling et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2013a, 2013b) may explain why the models, on average, predicted force more accurately for the MG than for the LG. The MG and LG are thought to have different motor unit twitch profiles (Vandervoort and McComas 1983; Lee et al. 2011), and these differences also may explain why the two-element model predicted force more accurately for the MG than for the LG.

This review summarizes the main findings from a multifaceted and integrated set of studies involving in vivo and in situ experiments. Each of the different facets is subject to specific assumptions and limitations that should be considered when evaluating the global accuracy, validity, and usefulness of these findings. The models presented here are driven in a forward-dynamics manner using the EMG signals to drive the activation levels of the muscles. The PC analysis for the EMG explained 76% of the signal for PCI and PCII. In a companion in situ and isometric study using the same animals and EMG placements, PCI and PCII explained 87% of the signal (Lee et al. 2011): The unexplained component of signal would have included signal noise, and the fact that the spectral components of each motor unit action potential for indwelling EMG studies are very dependent on the location and orientation of the electrodes relative to the active motor units. The additional 11% of the signal unexplained in the in vivo data reported here likely contained movement artifacts, and contributions from the muscle length, temperature, and fatigue that fluctuate during each recording session (Wakeling et al. 2001). However, the advantage of the use of PC analysis to decode the EMG signals is that it extracts major components of the signal and effectively filters out these lower-order effects (Wakeling 2009), which are not accommodated by the models under evaluation. The activation levels of the muscles, as calculated from the EMG intensities, used to drive the models (whether the total intensity, or the fast- or slow-components) are all derived from the same raw signals and, thus, would be expected to show similar onset and offset times with similar time-courses for the predicted forces. However, where the EMG intensities largely differ is in their relative magnitude, and this is the important feature that drives the differences in the modelS’ performances.

The reviewed studies show that two-element models are more effective at predicting muscle forces when they are driven by the EMG signal-derived active states. What is remaining to uncover is how such models would respond, or even be implemented, in inverse-dynamics simulations of muscle force. Simulations can be used to predict the muscle excitations based on driving forces and dynamics (Crowninshield and Brand 1981; Thelen et al. 2003; Delp et al. 2007). However, the introduction of multi-element muscles results in the possibility that each muscle is under-determined with no unique set of fast- and slow-activations for the contractile elements. Predicted activations would thus need to be determined by optimization; however, the appropriate physiological cost functions that determine motor-unit recruitment patterns may be multi-factorial and have yet to be fully established (Hodson-Tole and Wakeling 2009). This is clearly an area for future research, to establish an appropriate framework to evaluate multi-element muscle models within inverse-dynamic simulations.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Drs. Jennifer Carr, Maria Miara, and Natalie Holt for their expert assistance with the experiments that were carried out at Harvard University and Pedro Ramirez for care of the animals.

Funding

Support for participation in this symposium was provided by the Company of Biologists, and the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (Divisions of Vertebrate Morphology, Comparative Biomechanics, Neurobiology, and Animal Behavior), in addition to NIH grant R01AR055648, which funded the work reviewed here.

References

  1. Anderson FC, Pandy MG. Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking. Gait Posture. 2003;17:159–69. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00073-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azizi E, Brainerd EL, Roberts TJ. Variable gearing in pennate muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1745–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709212105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azizi E, Roberts TJ. Muscle performance during frog jumping: influence of elasticity on muscle operating lengths. Proc R Sci B Biol Sci. 2010;277:1523–30. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biewener AA, Baudinette RV. In vivo muscle force and elastic energy storage during steady-speed hopping of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) J Exp Biol. 1995;198:1829–41. doi: 10.1242/jeb.198.9.1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech. 1981;14:793–801. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(81)90035-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelan DG. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:1940–50. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox MD, Reinbolt JA, Ounpuu S, Delp SL. Mechanisms of improved knee flexion after rectus femoris transfer surgery. J Biomech. 2009;42:614–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Full RJ, Ahn AN. Static forces and moments generated in the insect leg: comparison of a three-dimensional musculo-skeletal computer model with experimental measurements. J Exp Biol. 1995;198:1285–98. doi: 10.1242/jeb.198.6.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillis GB, Flynn JP, McGuigan P, Biewener AA. Patterns of strain and activation in the thigh muscles of goats across gaits during level locomotion. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:4599–611. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall AL, Peterson CL, Kautz SA, Neptune RR. Relationships between muscle contributions to walking subtasks and functional walking status in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Biomech. 2011;26:509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamner SR, Seth A, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running. J Biomech. 2010;43:2709–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henneman E, Clamann HP, Gillies JD, Skinner RD. Rank order of motorneurons within a pool, law of combination. J Neurophysiol. 1974;37:1338–49. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.6.1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hodson-Tole EF, Wakeling JM. Variations in motor unit recruitment patterns occur within and between muscles in the running rat (Rattus norvegicus) J Exp Biol. 2007;210:2333–45. doi: 10.1242/jeb.004457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hodson-Tole EF, Wakeling JM. Motor unit recruitment patterns 2: the influence of myoelectric intensity and muscle fascicle strain rate. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:1893–902. doi: 10.1242/jeb.014415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodson-Tole EF, Wakeling JM. Motor unit recruitment for dynamic tasks: current understanding and future directions. J Comp Physiol B. 2009;179:57–66. doi: 10.1007/s00360-008-0289-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Holt NC, Wakeling JM, Biewener AA. The effect of fast and slow motor unit activation on whole muscle mechanical performance: the size principle may not pose a mechanical paradox. Proc R Sci B Biol Sci. 2014;281:20140002. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hutchinson JR, Garcia M. Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner. Nature. 2002;415:1018–21. doi: 10.1038/4151018a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kargo WJ, Nelson FE, Rome LC. Jumping in frogs: assessing the design of the skeletal system by anatomically realistic modeling and forward dynamic simulation. J Exp Biol. 2002;205:1683–702. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.12.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee SS, de Boef Miara M, Arnold AS, Biewener AA, Wakeling JM. EMG analysis tuned for determining the timing and level of activation in different motor units. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21:557–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee SS, de Boef Miara M, Arnold AS, Biewener AA, Wakeling JM. Recruitment of faster motor units is associated with greater rates of fascicle strain and rapid changes in muscle force during locomotion. J Exp Biol. 2013a;216:198–207. doi: 10.1242/jeb.072637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee SS, de Boef Miara M, Arnold AS, Biewener AA, Wakeling JM. Accuracy of gastrocnemius forces in walking and running goats predicted by one-element and two-element Hill-type models. J Biomech. 2013b;43:2288–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sargeatnt AJ. In vivo measurements of the triceps sure complex architecture in man: implications for muscle function. J Physiol. 1998;513:603–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.603be.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McGuigan MP, Yoo E, Lee DV, Biewener AA. Dynamics of goat distal hind limb muscle–tendon function in response to locomotor grade. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:2092–104. doi: 10.1242/jeb.028076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Millard M, Uchida T, Seth A, Delp SL. 2013. Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. ASME J Biomech Eng; 135:021005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Otten EA. Myocybernetic model of the jaw system of the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1987;21:287–302. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(87)90123-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Perreault EJ, Heckman CJ, Sandercock TG. Hill muscle model errors during movement are greatest within the physiologically relevant range of motor unit firing rates. J Biomech. 2003;36:211–8. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00332-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peterson CL, Kautz SA, Neptune RR. Muscle work is increased in pre-swing during hemiparetic walking. Clin Biomech. 2011;26:859–66. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rankin JW, Paxton H, Hutchinson JR. Integrating experimental and computer simulation methods to reconstruct the evolution of avian bipedalism. Soc Int Comp Biol. 2014 S5.3-1. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sandercock TG, Heckman CJ. Force from cat soleus muscle during imposed locomotor-like movements: experimental data versus Hill-type model predictions. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:1538–52. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thelen DG. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125:70–7. doi: 10.1115/1.1531112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thelen DG, Anderson F, Delp S. Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J Biomech. 2003;36:321–8. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00432-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Umberger BR, Gerritsen KGM, Martin PE. A model of human muscle energy expenditure. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2003;6:99–111. doi: 10.1080/1025584031000091678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Ingen Schenau GJ, Bobbert MF, Ettema GJ, de Graaf JB, Huijing PA. A simulation of rat EDL force output based on intrinsic muscle properties. J Biomech. 1988;21:815–24. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vandervoort AA, McComas AJ. A comparison of the contractile proeprties of the human gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;15:435–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00429079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van Soest AJ, Bobbert MF. The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements. Biol Cybern. 1993;69:195–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00198959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. von Tscharner VI. Intensity analysis in time–frequency space of surface myoelectric signals by wavelets of specified resolution. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:433–45. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00030-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wakeling JM. Motor units are recruited in a task dependent fashion during locomotion. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3883–90. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wakeling JM. Patterns of motor recruitment can be determined using surface EMG. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wakeling JM, Blake OM, Wong I, Rana M, Lee SSM. Movement mechanics as a determinate of muscle structure, recruitment and coordination. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2011;366:1554–64. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wakeling JM, Lee SS, Arnold AS, de Boef Miara M, Biewener AA. A muscle’s force depends on the recruitment patterns of its fibers. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40:1708–20. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0531-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wakeling JM, Pascual SA, Nigg BM, von Tscharner V. Surface EMG shows distinct populations of muscle activity when measured during sustained sub-maximal exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;86:40–7. doi: 10.1007/s004210100508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wakeling JM, Rozitis AI. Spectral properties of myoelectric signals from different motor units in the leg extensor muscles. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:2519–28. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wakeling JM, Syme DA. Wave properties of action potentials from fast and slow motor units of rats. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26:659–68. doi: 10.1002/mus.10263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and applications to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Engng. 1989;17:359–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Integrative and Comparative Biology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES