Skip to main content
Infection Ecology & Epidemiology logoLink to Infection Ecology & Epidemiology
. 2015 Jan 14;5:10.3402/iee.v5.26055. doi: 10.3402/iee.v5.26055

Do open garbage dumps play a role in canine rabies transmission in Biyem-Assi health district in Cameroon?

Tabue N Raymond 1,2,*, Madgan E Roland 3, Kenfack M M Françoise 1, Zeukeng Francis 2, Esemu F Livo 2, Seumen T H Clovis 2
PMCID: PMC4297275  PMID: 25595689

Abstract

Background

Rabies is a neglected enzootic disease which represents a serious public health problem. In Cameroon, efforts to prevent human deaths caused by rabies are often thwarted by the lack of community awareness. The community knowledge, as well as attitudes and perception on rabies, is therefore important for both prevention of human deaths and control in animals.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate the level of community knowledge as well as the role of open garbage dumps (OGDs) in the epidemiology of human rabies. Overall 420 heads of household were interviewed in the Biyem-Assi health district of Yaoundé. OGDs were identified through a systematic check, and household wastes they contained were characterized.

Results

Although 66.9% of respondents have knowledge on stray dogs, only 35% of respondents knew the role of OGDs in the increase of stray dog population. Overall OGDs consisted of fermentable wastes. Nutrition places for stray dogs were wild garbage dumps (68.1%), markets (18.3%), and houses (13.6%). The feeding behavior of stray dogs correlated significantly with the human rabies transmission (χ 2=154.12, df=4, p<0.05).

Conclusion

Most participants knew that rabies could be transmitted by a dog bite as well as the measures to be taken in this type of situation. Increased knowledge of respondents on rabies showed OGDs and stray dogs as significant risk factors for canine rabies in Biyem-Assi health district.

Keywords: rabies, stray dog, open garbage dumps, Cameroon


Rabies is a viral zoonosis caused by negative-stranded RNA viruses from the Lyssavirus genus. Although rabies can infect and be transmitted by a wide range of mammals, dogs remain the main reservoir (1, 2). The highest rabies burden is attributable to dog-mediated transmission and human rabies cases (>90%) resulting from bites of rabid dogs (3, 4). Nowadays, most human deaths caused by canine rabies occur in Asia and Africa with about 30,000 and 23,800 cases per year, respectively (4). Estimates of rabies burden in Africa have always been uncertain due to a lack of reliable data. Successful rabies control has been observed in many parts of Central and South America through large-scale and synchronized mass dog vaccination campaigns (5). However, few large-scale dog vaccination programs were implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, the incidence of rabies might be underestimated by more than 100-fold because most deaths occur in communities rather than in hospitals (6, 7), and those that occur in hospitals are frequently misdiagnosed as forms of encephalitis (8). Moreover, people are not aware of WHO guidelines on rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) (9). Consequently, in developing countries, dog bite victims fail to receive PEP due to lack of awareness on rabies or because of high treatment cost (4, 7, 10). Most expenditure for PEP is borne by those who can least afford it. As a result, many patients do not complete their treatment.

Most cities in Cameroon are facing increasing populations. This situation coupled with extreme poverty leads to promiscuity and insalubrity in streets and neighborhoods (11). Cameroonian cities produce large quantities of household wastes, and their transport to the collection sites remains problematic. The average production of household wastes in Yaounde increases from 850 g/capita/day in 1998 (12) to 6.5 kg/capita/day in 2007 (13). Out of the 1,023 tonnes of household wastes produce each day, only 70% (about 700 tonnes) could be collected every day by the municipality (1416). The remaining 30% represent household wastes that could not be collected mainly from suburbs with poor road infrastructures. Therefore, it is more likely to find open garbage dumps (OGDs) near residential houses due to the difficulty for the municipality vehicles to drive inside and the distance of houses to the collection points. In suburbs, wastes are dumped directly to OGDs and sometimes into drains leading to flooding during the rainy season. The proximity of these OGDs to households could increase the frequency of man-stray dog contact, thus the risk of rabies transmission. Nonetheless, it is clear that rabies disproportionately affects poor communities and particularly children. The situation is exacerbated because household wastes are mostly transported to dumps by children who present the highest risks for rabies (17). Therefore, the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) burden for rabies is particularly high and a greater number of life years are lost (18, 19).

Various cases of rabies recorded in Yaounde were attributed to dog bites. Between January and September 2013, there were 137 human cases of dog bites which contributed to 19 deaths in Cameroon (20). These animals are kept essentially as pets and for guarding. In Cameroon like in other developing countries, dogs are intimately dependent on humans for food and shelter (21). This association means that dogs’ population can be correlated in size as well as in distribution, with human populations (22, 23). Furthermore, social changes such as urbanization resulted in an increase in human and dog movements (24). In cities, the human population, as well as the dog population, has expanded enormously. Unfortunately, low population income in Cameroonian cities does not always allow dogs owners to properly feed their pets. As a consequence, unrestricted dogs scavenge for food and roam the streets in search of sex mates (2527).

In Cameroon, no data actually exist about the distribution of pet animals in Yaounde. Available statistics are only based on people who brought their animal for vaccination. One of the principal factors contributing to low prioritization of rabies control has been the lack of information on the burden and impact of the disease (28).

To fill the gap and provide baseline data on rabies, a survey was conducted in Biyem-Assi health district of Yaounde to evaluate the level of knowledge and perception of the population on rabies and the role of OGDs in the transmission of this disease. This was carried out in order to contribute to a better understanding of rabies’ epidemiology in Cameroonian cities and to recommend new integrated rabies control methods.

Methods

Ethical considerations

Prior to the study, an administrative authorization was obtained from the Divisional Officer of the Biyem-Assi health district. Participation was strictly voluntary and was dependent on oral consent by the participants. Respondents were informed of the study and the confidentiality of the data to be collected.

Study site

The study was carried out from October 2013 to March 2014 in the Biyem-Assi health district (03°84′N, 11°49′E) which is located in the South West of Yaoundé, the capital of Cameroon (Fig. 1). Its population is estimated at 310,000 (29) and is characterized by increasing numbers of stray dogs in the streets and the large number of wild garbage dumps positioned closely to households.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of Yaounde Health District showing the location of the study sites.

Sampling procedure

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Overall, 420 households were surveyed using a systematic random sampling method. The head of each household or its substitute (>18 years old) was interviewed in French for 10–15 min using a structured questionnaire.

Questionnaire design

The questionnaire designed for this study consisted of closed and a few open-ended questions. It had four parts: anthropometric and socio-demographic information, risk factors of rabies transmission (stray dogs and OGDs), knowledge/attitude/perception of rabies, and its measures of control. The questionnaire was pretested in a neighborhood quarter with the similar socio-demographic characteristic prior to the survey and was modified to improve its clarity and analysis.

Characterization of OGDs

An observational method was considered more appropriate to characterize household wastes in OGDs. Through a systematic check, OGDs were identified and solid wastes were characterized as fermentable, hazardous, or non-hazardous wastes. The approximate distance of each OGD to the nearest house was evaluated and reported.

Statistical analysis

Vaccinated dogs were defined as those that had been immunized (oral or parenteral) 1 year before the survey. Data were analyzed using Epi-Info version 7.0. The Chi-square test was used to set the difference in proportions or frequencies. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

Overall 420 respondents were interviewed in this study. Most respondents were female (66%) and single (51.9%). Respondents’ median age was 35 years and ranged from 18 to 73 years. The main education levels of participants were primary (39.8%) and secondary (34.3%) schools. Slightly under a quarter (22.1%) had attended higher education institutions (Table 1). Approximately 32.14% of respondents had at least one dog and 67% of them had vaccinated dogs.

Table 1.

Demographic and socio-demographic characteristics

Male Female Total
Gender 143 (34.0%) 277 (66.0%) 420 (100%)
Marital status
 Married 59 (14.0%) 143 (34.0%) 202 (48.1%)
 Single 84 (20.0%) 134 (31.9%) 218 (51.9%)
Educational level
 Primary school 43 (10.2%) 124 (29.5%) 167 (39.8%)
 Secondary school 68 (16.2%) 76 (18.1%) 144 (34.3%)
 Higher institution 29 (6.9%) 64 (15.2%) 93 (22.1%)
 Never attended school 3 (0.7%) 13 (3.1%) 16 (3.8%)
Age
 18–29 43 (10.2%) 96 (22.9%) 215 (51.2%)
 30–41 81 (19.3%) 134 (31.9%) 139 (33.1%)
  > 42 19 (4.5%) 47 (11.2%) 66 (15.7%)

OGDs characterization

A total of 134 OGDs were numbered in the Biyem-Assi health district and the average distance between these OGDs and the nearest households ranged from 5 to 15 m with a median distance of 10 m. Some solid wastes including plastic, textile, paper, paperboard, and food wastes were steadily found in every OGD (Table 2).

Table 2.

Solid wastes characterization

Typology of solid household waste Number (N=143) Frequency (%)
Fermentable wastes
 Food waste 143 100
 Plant waste 41 28.67
 Dead animals 26 18.18
Non-hazardous wastes
 Wood waste 68 47.55
 Inert waste (paved, gravel, bricks, tiles) 86 60.14
 Scrap metal (ferrous and non-ferrous metals) 102 71.33
 Paper and paperboard 143 100
 Textile 143 100
 Glass (cups, jars, bottles, jars) 123 86.01
Hazardous wastes
 Waste plastics (water, juice bottles …) 143 100
 Tires 54 37.76
 End of life vehicles 5 3.50
 Batteries and fluorescent tube 8 5.59
 Electrical and electronic waste 79 55.24

Risk factors of rabies transmission

Risks factors associated with OGDs

Questioned about risks of closed dumps to households, 35 and 28.1% of respondents estimated that this predominantly leads to an increase of stray dog density and mosquitoes, respectively. OGDs were considered as the source of unhealthy environment and disease at 21.9 and 15%, respectively. Regarding the definition of stray dog, 66.9% of heads of households knew what a stray dog is while for 14.76% stray dogs are domestic dogs, pet dogs for 8.81%, or guard dogs for 6.90%. Feeding places for stray dogs were wild garbage dumps (68.1%), markets (18.3%), and houses (13.6%). The Chi-square test analysis of feeding behavior of stray dogs as well as risk they incur revealed that 42% of respondents consider the feeding behavior of stray dogs as a potential risk for rabies transmission (Table 3). There was a direct association between feeding behavior of stray dogs and rabies transmission at a significant level (χ 2=154.12, df=4, p<0.05). Only 18% of respondents considered OGDs as a risk factor for rabies.

Table 3.

Stray dogs and risk linked to feeding behavior

Risk factors

Feeding behavior Killing Rabies transmission Pest transmission Total
Open garbage dump 45 (10.71%) 241 (57.38%) 0 286 (68.10%)
House 25 (5.95%) 18 (4.29%) 14 (3.33%) 57 (13.57%)
Market 36 (8.57%) 19 (4.52%) 22 (5.24%) 77 (18.33%)
Total 106 (25.24%) 278 (66.19%) 36 (8.57%) 420 (100%)

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to rabies

All participants involved in the study have full knowledge concerning rabies transmission by dog bites. In contrast, only 32% of respondents attribute rabies transmission to scratching and licking of a rabid dog. Concerning transmission of rabies by bites of animals other than dogs, 21 and 15% of respondents attributed rabies to cats and cows, respectively.

Concerning the perception of rabies symptoms in humans, rabies was characterized by fever (10%), wound infection (51.43%), and diarrhea (6.67%). A total of 31.90% of respondents were unable to state the symptoms of rabies in humans (Fig. 2). Concerning the perception of rabies symptoms in dogs, rabies was characterized by irritability (49%), skin lesions (26.9%), and alopecia (11%). A total of 13.1% of respondents had no idea about the symptoms of rabies in dogs (Fig. 3). As measures to be taken in the case of dog bites, 56% of participants accepted that they would disinfect the wound after washing with water, 35% reported that they would go to hospital, and 9% did not know what to do in this situation (Table 4). Concerning control measures, participants recommended the destruction of OGDs to reduce stray dog population (36%), the regulation of stray dog density in the district (48%), and the vaccination of dogs (16%).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Perception of rabies symptoms in humans.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Perception of rabies symptoms in dogs.

Table 4.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices responds frequency

Questions on knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to rabies Answers (N=240) Frequency (%)
Definition of stray dog
 Domestic dogs 62 14.76
 Roaming dog 281 66.90
 Pet dog 37 8.81
 Guard dogs 29 6.90
 Others 11 2.62
Risks of closed dumps to households
 Source of disease 63 15.0
 Increase of stray dogs density 147 35.0
 Mosquitoes 118 28.1
 Source of unhealthy environment 92 21.9
Rabies transmission mode
 Dog bites 420 100
 Scratching and licking of rabid dogs 135 32.1
 Scratching cats 89 21.2
 Licking of cow 63 15.00
 Others 12 2.86
Perception of human symptoms
 Diarrhea 28 6.67
 Fever 42 10.00
 Wound infection 216 51.43
 Hydrophobia 25 5.95
 No idea 109 25.95
Perception of dogs symptoms
 Irritability 206 49.05
 Loss of fur 46 10.95
 Skin lesions 113 26.90
 No idea 55 13.10
Measures to be taken in case of dog bites
 Disinfect the wound after water washing 235 55.95
 Go to the hospital 147 35.00
 Did not know what to do 37 8.81
 Others 1 0.24
Rabies control measures
 Reduce stray dog population 202 48.10
 Vaccination of dogs 67 15.95
 Destruction of OGDs 151 35.95
 Others 0 0.00

Discussion

Instead of its preventive possibility, rabies remains a public health problem of major concern. The situation is alarming in rural Africa and Asia where canine rabies has been severely neglected (30). Moreover, the periodicity of epidemics leads to only intermittently perceiving rabies as a problem (31). In these rural areas, the disease persistence is due to poverty and the increase of wild carnivore populations (32). Regarding canine rabies in Africa, most studies focus on dog vaccinations while little is known about the origin and factors that favor the free roaming of dogs and human rabies transmission. Thus, transmission and identification of risk factors are the most important processes underlying infectious disease dynamics (33), but it is also the least understood. Therefore, knowledge and attitudes of the population, perception of rabies, and the impact of OGDs on the transmission of rabies were investigated in Biyem-Assi health district of Yaounde through a cross-sectional study. To the best of our knowledge, this study stands as the first conducted to highlight the public health threat of rabies in Cameroon.

Findings of this study indicate that rabies is an important public health problem in the Biyem-Assi health district and that community awareness, knowledge, and perception of rabies were high among the respondents. These data corroborate with those obtained in some endemic countries of South Asia that revealed a high level of knowledge on rabies transmission. In fact, about 98.6% of the population knew that rabies is transmitted by rabid dogs (3436).

This high level of awareness among the respondents may be attributed to their level of education. In fact, 96% of the respondents had attended, at least, primary school (Table 1).

Nevertheless, this study has shown some knowledge gaps among the study population. About 31% of respondents did not know what stray dogs were, 32% of dogs were not vaccinated and 31.90% of respondents did not know the symptoms of rabies in humans. This indicates that there is a need for rabies awareness education in this community. Educating the population on rabies and the risk factors associated with its transmission could fill this knowledge gap. The study also showed that within dogs’ owners, there is a good coverage of vaccination (>67%) and the rabies PEP behaviors in the population are considerable. This was confirmed by the fact that 56% of participants would disinfect their wounds and 35% would go to hospital for treatment after a dog bite. Unfortunately, poor households are facing increasing financial difficulties, resulting in substantial delays in PEP delivery (7).

Moreover, the current results indicate that respondents believe that OGDs are a public health problem in the community and lead to stray dogs proliferation. Most wastes had a household origin and stray dogs were mostly attracted by fermentable wastes from cooking or lapsed foods. This corroborates previous studies conducted on solid waste management in India (37). Participants therefore recommended control programs for both OGDs and dogs populations. These measures should be implemented by the Cameroonian government, which took the initiative to increase the number of veterinary vaccination centers all over the country. This decision is facing some discrepancies as many dogs in this country, like elsewhere in Africa, had no owner. This situation therefore renders parenteral vaccination inaccessible (38). An integrated rabies control measure coupling dog vaccination, elimination of factors that contribute to dog free-roaming and proliferation must be implemented. These integrated measures can lead to rabies elimination for the reason that in Cameroon like elsewhere in Central and West Africa, domestic dogs are the only rabies vectors (39). Studies in other countries have shown that children are more frequently bitten (6). Therefore, awareness education should be planned, targeting children who are usually responsible for the transport of garbage to dumps; that is, they are more likely to meet stray dogs scavenging for food around dumps.

Conclusion

This study reveals that OGDs near residential houses and stray dogs increase the risk factor for canine rabies transmission in Biyem-Assi health district. Therefore, if a sustainable effort to maintain sufficient vaccination coverage in the domestic dog populations is a crucial step towards global elimination of canine rabies (32), an integrated control method including environmental cleaning up through the improvement of solid waste management to avoid the proliferation of OGDs is therefore necessary.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the population and the authorities of Biyem-Assi health district for the frank collaboration.

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.

References

  • 1.Chalmers AW, Scott G. Ecology of rabies. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1969;1:33–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wandeler AI, Bingham J. Dogs and rabies. In: Macpherson CNL, Meslin FX, editors. Dogs, zoonoses and public health. Wallingford: CAB International; 2013. pp. 43–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coetzee P, Nel LH. Emerging epidemic dog rabies in coastal South Africa: a molecular epidemiological analysis. Virus Res. 2007;126:186–95. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Meltzer MI, Miranda ME, et al. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:360–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belotto A, Leanes LF, Schneider MC, Tamayo H, Correa E. Overview of rabies in the Americas. Virus Res. 2005;111:5–12. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2005.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cleaveland S, Fèvre EM, Kaare M, Coleman PG. Estimating human rabies mortality in the United Republic of Tanzania from dog bites injuries. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:304–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hampson K, Dobson A, Kaare M, Dushoff J, Magoto M, Sindoya E. Rabies exposures, post-exposure prophylaxis and deaths in a region of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mallewa M, Fooks AR, Banda D, Chikungwa P, Mankhambo L, Molyneux E, et al. Rabies encephalitis in malaria-endemic area, Malawi, Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:136–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1301.060810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.WHO. WHO position paper on rabies vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010;85:309–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kayali U, Mindekem R, Yémadji N, Vounatsou P, Kaninga Y, Ndoutamia AG, et al. Coverage of pilot parenteral vaccination campaign against canine rabies in N'Djaména, Chad. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:739–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.MINEP. Yaoundé, Cameroun: Ministére de l’Environnement et de la Protection de la Nature; 2008. Stratégie Nationale de Gestion des Déchets au Cameroun (période 2007–2015) pp. 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ngnikam E, Tanawa E. Les villes d'Afrique face à leurs déchets; UTBM, Belfort-Montbéliard; 2007. p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jaza FAJ. The economic costs of illness from the disposal of the Yaoundé household waste at the Nkolfoulou dumping site in Cameroon. J Hum Ecol. 2008;24:7–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ndoumbé NH. Le Compost d'Ordures Ménagères et son Utilisation en Agriculture. In: Seck MA, editor. Proceedings du Séminaire sur la Vulgarisation du Compost, Yaoundé, Cameroun, 17–18 Mai 1994; Yaoundé: Gie Alouch; 1994. pp. 31–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ngnikam E, Wethe J, Vermande P. Une Méthode d’Évaluation de la Production des Déchets dans les Marchés des Villes Africaines: L'exemple de Douala et de Yaoundé au Cameroun. Bull Afr. 1995;5:11–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ngnikam E. Evaluation Environnementale et Economique de Systèmes de Gestion des Déchets Solides Municipaux: Analyse du Cas de Yaoundé au Cameroun; Lyon, France: Institut des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA); 2000. Thèse de Doctorat. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wunner WH, Briggs DJ. Review rabies in the 21 century. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Cleaveland S. Estimating the public health impact of rabies. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:140–2. doi: 10.3201/eid1001.020744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kilic B, Unal B, Semin S, Konakci SK. An important public health problem: rabies suspected bites and post-exposure prophylaxis in a health district in Turkey. Int J Infect Dis. 2006;10:248–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cameroun-Rage:19 morts depuis Janvier dans le pays. Available from: http://www.cameroon-info.net/stories/0,53733,@,cameroun-rage-19-morts-depuis-janvier-dans-le-pays.html [cited 17 May 2014]. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Butler JRA. Harare, Zimbabwe: University of Zimbabwe; The ecology of domestic dogs Canis familiaris in the communal lands of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brooks R. Survey of the dog population of Zimbabwe and its level of rabies vaccination. Vet Rec. 1990;127:592–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Franti CE, Kraus JF, Borhani NO. Pet ownership in suburban-rural area of California, 1970. Public Health Rep. 1974;89:473–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bingham J. Canine rabies ecology in Southern Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1337–42. doi: 10.3201/eid1109.050172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oboegbulem SI, Nwakonobi IE. Population density and ecology of dogs in Nigeria: a pilot study. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 1989;8:733–45. doi: 10.20506/rst.8.3.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tenzin, Dhand NK, Ward MP. Human rabies post exposure prophylaxis in Bhutan, 2005–2008: trends and risk factors. Vaccine. 2011;29:4094–101. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bögel K, Joshi DD. Accessibility of dog populations for rabies control in Kathmandu valley, Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68:611–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Awahndukum J, Tchoumboue J, Tong JC. Canine and human rabies in Cameroon. Trop Vet. 2002;20:162–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gruénais ME. Hamburg, London: LIT Verlag Münster; 2002. Changing a health system: the Cameroon case; p. 124. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rupprecht CE, Hanlon CA, Hemachudha T. Rabies re-examined. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:327–43. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00287-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hampson K, Dushoff J, Bingham J, Bruckner G, Ali YH, Dobson A. Synchronous cycles of domestic dog rabies in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact of control efforts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7717–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609122104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hampson K, Dushoff J, Cleaveland S, Haydon DT, Kaare M, Packer C, et al. Transmission dynamics and prospects for the elimination of canine rabies. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Begon M, Bennett M, Bowers RG, French NP, Hazel SM. A clarification of transmission terms in host-microparasite models: number, densities and areas. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129:147–53. doi: 10.1017/s0950268802007148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Matibag GC, Ditangco RA, Kamigaki T, Wijewardana TG, Kumarasiri PVR, Kalupahana AW, et al. Community-based evaluation of health-seeking behaviour of people with animal bite injuries in a district of Sri Lanka. J Int Health. 2008;23:173–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sharma M. Knowledge and attitude of dog owner's towards the dog anti-rabies vaccination. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2005;3:11–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Singh US, Choudhary SK. Knowledge, attitude, behavior and practice study on dog-bites and its management in the context of prevention of rabies in a rural community of Gujarat. Indian J Community Med. 2005;30:81–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Puri A, Kumar M, Johal E. Solid-waste management in Jalandhar city and its impact on community health. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2008;12:76–81. doi: 10.4103/0019-5278.43265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lembo T, Hampson K, Kaare MT, Ernest E, Knobel D, Kazwala RR, et al. The feasibility of canine rabies elimination in Africa: dispelling doubts with data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.El-Yuguda AD, Baba AA, Baba SSA. Dog population structure and cases of rabies among dog bite victims in urban and rural areas of Borno State, Nigeria. Trop Vet. 2007;25:34–40. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection Ecology & Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES