Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1976 Oct;10(4):727–732. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.727

Aerobically Incubated Thioglycolate Broth Disk Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobes

Terrence A Kurzynski 1, John W Yrios 1, Arlan G Helstad 1, Charles R Field 1
PMCID: PMC429821  PMID: 984807

Abstract

The anaerobic broth disk (AnBD) method of Wilkins and Thiel and a new modification, designated the thioglycolate broth disk method, were compared with an agar dilution technique. The thioglycolate broth disk method was incubated aerobically (AeTBD) or anaerobically (AnTBD). One hundred anaerobic bacteria representing 15 species were tested with clindamycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, penicillin, and tetracycline. Agreement of results by the two methods with minimal inhibitory concentration determinations were: AnBD, 95.2%; AnTBD, 91.5%; AeTBD, 94.5%. With clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and penicillin, the agreement of the AeTBD and agar dilution results was 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. Using the AeTBD method, only 1.1% of all tests gave false susceptible readings, whereas 4.4% gave false resistant readings. All susceptibility testing errors occurred with tetracycline, erythromycin, and, to a lesser extent, penicillin. For each method, the changes in designation of bacteria as being susceptible or resistant to an antibiotic between trials primarily involved strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations which were ± one dilution of the respective breakpoint value. The same situation was true for most bacteria that yielded false resistant readings within each trial. False resistant readings with tetracycline were determined to be unrelated to excess cation content of test media. These results reaffirm the reliability of the AnBD method and indicate that the AeTBD modification is equally reliable. The greater convenience and lower cost of the AeTBD method should make possible more widespread performance of susceptibility testing for anaerobic bacteria in hospital laboratories.

Full text

PDF
727

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALVAREZ J. P. A simplified sensitivity procedure for anaerobic micro-organisms. Am J Med Technol. 1955 Sep-Oct;21(5):249–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blazevic D. J. Evaluation of the modified broth-disk method for determining antibiotic susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Jun;7(6):721–723. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.6.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hauser K. J., Johnston J. A., Zabransky R. J. Economical agar dilution technique for susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 May;7(5):712–714. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.5.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ingham H. R., Selkon J. B., Codd A. A., Hale J. H. The effect of carbon dioxide on the sensitivity of Bacteroides fragilis to certain antibiotics in vitro. J Clin Pathol. 1970 Apr;23(3):254–258. doi: 10.1136/jcp.23.3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacLowry J. D., Jaqua M. J., Selepak S. T. Detailed methodology and implementation of a semiautomated serial dilution microtechnique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Jul;20(1):46–53. doi: 10.1128/am.20.1.46-53.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin W. J., Gardner M., Washington J. A., 2nd In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Feb;1(2):148–158. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stalons D. R., Thornsberry C. Broth-dilution method for determining the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Jan;7(1):15–21. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Staneck J. L., Washington J. A., 2nd Antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria: recent clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Sep;6(3):311–315. doi: 10.1128/aac.6.3.311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sutter V. L., Kwok Y. Y., Finegold S. M. Standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. I. Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to tetracycline. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb;23(2):268–275. doi: 10.1128/am.23.2.268-275.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wikins T. D., Holdeman L. V., Abramson I. J., Moore W. E. Standardized single-disc method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Jun;1(6):451–459. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.6.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilkins T. D., Thiel T. Modified broth-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):350–356. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.3.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES