Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2015 Jan 23;53(2):713–715. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02349-14

First Case Report of Fatal Sepsis Due to Campylobacter upsaliensis

Itaru Nakamura a, Nami Omori b, Ayaka Umeda b, Kiyofumi Ohkusu c,, Tetsuya Matsumoto c
Editor: P Bourbeau
PMCID: PMC4298521  PMID: 25411172

Abstract

We encountered a rare case of severe fatal infection in a 70-year-old woman due to Campylobacter upsaliensis, identified by PCR amplification and sequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA gene using DNA extracted from the isolates. To our knowledge, fatal sepsis due to this organism has never been described to date.

CASE REPORT

A 70-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department complaining of loss of consciousness. On admission, her vital signs showed lethargy, hypothermia (35.1°C), hypotension (systolic blood pressure of 80 mm Hg), and tachycardia (pulse rate of 160 per minute). She did not have any recent episodes of diarrhea or enterocolitis, as assessed at her periodic visits to our hospital. Prolonged hypoglycemia with treatment resistance was also observed, and glucose was administered more than once. She had a history of left ureteral cancer, thyroid cancer, ectopic Cushing's syndrome, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Laboratory examination showed a normal white blood cell count, thrombocytopenia, a high serum transaminase level, and acute kidney injury (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15.4 ml/min/liter). Severe metabolic acidosis and lactic acidosis were also observed. Enhanced computed tomography imaging led to a diagnosis of Stanford type A dissecting aortic aneurysm with cardiac tamponade. Enteritis and abscesses were not observed. Although pericardiocentesis was performed for the cardiac tamponade caused by the dissecting aortic aneurysm, the patient chose not to have artificial blood vessel replacement performed. Large amounts of vasopressors (noradrenaline and dopamine) and glucose were administered while the patient was in the intensive care unit. Cefazolin (2 g per day) was administered to prevent surgical site infection following pericardiocentesis rather than as a treatment for the original infection. However, severe hypotension, hypoglycemia, and liver failure worsened without improvement. The patient died due to multiorgan failure 2 days after admission.

Bacterial isolates from the blood of the patient, which was taken at admission for the evaluation of hypertension, were positive in Bactec aerobic bottles alone (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Subculture of the positive blood culture bottle yielded growth after 72 h of microaerobic incubation at 37°C (2 days after the patient's death). Bacterial identification using API Campy (Sysmex-bioMérieux, Tokyo, Japan) did not yield a definitive identification. Therefore, PCR amplification and sequencing were performed to analyze the 16S rRNA gene using DNA extracted from the isolates. Genomic DNA from all strains grown were extracted by physical extraction using zirconia beads (Mora extraction kit; AMR Co., Gifu, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The universal primers 8UA (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1485B (5′-ACGGGCGGTGTGTRC-3′) were used as described previously (1). We performed sequencing analysis using a GenBank BLAST search and EzTaxon (http://www.ezbiocloud.net/eztaxon/). The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene (GenBank accession no. AB980278) was 99.1% identical (1,437 bp over the entire 1,450 bp fragment) with that of Campylobacter upsaliensis strain DSM5365 (accession number L14628). Based on the sequencing results, we identified the isolate as C. upsaliensis. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli (2). The MICs of the antibiotic agents were determined by the broth microdilution method using MicroScan (Siemens, Tokyo, Japan), except for azithromycin (AZM), for which Etest (bioMérieux, France) was used. The MICs of antibiotics against the C. upsaliensis strain are shown in Table 1. Antibiotic agents like penicillins, cephalosporins, and macrolides, including AZM, showed low MICs, consistent with previous reports (35). On the other hand, the MIC of fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin) was >8 μg/ml, indicating resistance to fluoroquinolone, as seen in a previous report (4).

TABLE 1.

MICs of antibiotics against C. upsaliensis isolated from the patient's blood culture

Antimicrobial agent MIC (μg/ml)a
Penicillin G 0.5
Ampicillin ≤0.06
Ampicillin-sulbactam ≤0.25/0.125
Cefotiam 1.0
Ceftriaxone 1.0
Meropenem ≤0.12
Erythromycin ≤0.12
Azithromycin 1.25
Levofloxacin >8
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim ≤0.5/9.5
a

The MIC of each antibiotic was determined by broth microdilution performed according to the CLSI standards, except for azithromycin, whose MIC was determined using Etest.

C. upsaliensis is known as a catalase-negative or weakly positive thermotolerant Campylobacter species (3). This organism's characteristics include the absence of H2S production on triple sugar iron agar and susceptibility to nalidixic acid and cephalosporin. Therefore, C. upsaliensis was reported as being intolerant to the culture conditions optimized for C. jejuni and C. coli (6). Because routine laboratory procedures also overlooked this organism in our case, cases of C. upsaliensis infection might still be underdiagnosed.

C. upsaliensis has been reported mainly as an organism causing diarrhea not only in dogs (7) but in humans (8). The presumed transmission of this organism from dogs and cats to humans has been reported (7, 9). Water or food contaminated with the feces of pets, such as dogs or cats, might be routes of transmission. On the other hand, the majority of human-infecting strains are genetically separate from the canine-infecting strains, indicating that dogs may not be the main source of human infection (10). In addition, there is only 1 report to date on human-to-human transmission (11). Although C. upsaliensis is an emerging diarrhea-causing pathogen that is thought to be transmitted from household pets (7, 9), the patient had no history of owning pets. She also did not have contact with any other person with diarrhea or colitis; therefore, her infection route is unclear.

C. upsaliensis has most frequently been reported as the causative organism in cases of enteritis and bacteremia (Table 2). In addition, C. upsaliensis was also isolated from patients with extraintestinal infections. These previous reports are summarized in Table 2. However, to our knowledge, a severe fatal case due to this organism has never been described to date, and the clinical spectrum of this organism in humans is not fully understood.

TABLE 2.

Thirty-four cases of C. upsaliensis infection from previous reportsa

Age (yrs or as indicated) Sex Underlying disease Clinical presentation Reference
Hemolytic uremic syndrome 16
4 Guillain-Barré syndrome 17
64 M Guillain-Barré syndrome 18
83 M CHF, CRF, COPD Bacteremia 14
10 (mo) M None Bacteremia 14
20 M None Enteritis 14
72 M CRF Peritonitis 14
35 F AML Enteritis 14
6 (mo) M None URI, erythematous tympanic membranes 14
38 M AIDS Bacteremia 14
1 M URI Enteritis 14
80 F Glioblastoma Bacteremia 14
25 F REP Bacteremia 14
64 M LC Bacteremia 14
11 F None Enteritis 12
36 M Alcohol syndrome Pneumonia 12
30 F None Burn 12
4 F None Enteritis 12
6 M Anorexia Enteritis 12
9 M Kwashiorkor Bacteremia 12
13 F None Enteritis 12
9 M Anemia Pneumonia 12
7 F Myocarditis Bacteremia 12
6 M None Enteritis 12
18 M Kwashiorkor Bacteremia 12
27 M Kwashiorkor Enteritis 12
10 F Underweight for age Enteritis 12
12 M None Enteritis 12
2 F Kwashiorkor Enteritis 12
18 F Kwashiorkor Bacteremia 12
46 F None Breast abscess 19
26 F None Abortion 9
24 M Knee arthroplasty Prosthetic knee infection 15
83 M IBS Persistent bloody diarrhea 5
70 M UC, TC, CS Severe sepsis This report
a

—: unknown; M, male; F, female; CHF, congestive heart failure; CRF, chronic renal insufficiency; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; URI, upper respiratory illness; REP, ruptured ectopic pregnancy; LC, liver cirrhosis; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; UC, ureteral cancer; TC, thyroid cancer; CS, Cushing's syndrome.

We concluded that the patient's severe hypotension, severe acute liver failure, acute kidney injury, lactic acidosis, and hypoglycemia were all caused by the sepsis, because no other cause of these symptoms could be identified. In addition, enteritis was not observed in the patient. Infections due to C. upsaliensis have been reported to be associated with an underlying disease or immunocompromised state, including human immunodeficiency virus infection (1214). This patient also had a history of cancer and endocrine disease.

To our knowledge, a severe fatal case of C. upsaliensis infection resulting in multiorgan failure, such as this case, has never been reported to date. Dissecting aortic aneurysms are usually induced by aortic sclerosis. The causal association between C. upsaliensis bacteremia and the aneurysm in this case is unclear, because an infected aneurysm is usually of the saccular type, and C. upsaliensis was detected only in the blood culture (the patient's aortic tissue was not obtained).

In previous reports, erythromycin resistance of C. upsaliensis infections ranged from 10% to 15% (6, 14), and ciprofloxacin resistance was approximately 5% (4). C. upsaliensis isolated from our patient showed a high MIC only for fluoroquinolone, in addition to macrolides, similar to a previous report (15). For the selection of antibiotic treatments, further data on the antibiograms of C. upsaliensis strains from different countries are required. In addition, there was a significant time lag until the identification of this organism in our case. Because C. upsaliensis infection is rare in clinical settings, if a patient has underlying disease, as in our case, treatment assuming C. upsaliensis infection is unlikely to be performed.

This case report is thought to be valuable since it highlights a severe and rare case due to C. upsaliensis, an emerging pathogen. It is important to clarify the conditions and medium required to culture this organism. The clinical spectrum of C. upsaliensis infection remains unclear, and further studies are required to establish appropriate treatments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are indebted to the medical editors of the Department of International Medical Communications of Tokyo Medical University for the editorial review of the English manuscript.

We declare no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Funato M, Kaneko H, Ohkusu K, Sasai H, Kubota K, Ohnishi H, Kato Z, Fukao T, Kondo N. 2011. Refractory chronic pleurisy caused by Helicobacter equorum-like bacterium in a patient with X-linked agammaglobulinemia. J Clin Microbiol 49:3432–3435. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00478-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CLSI. 2010. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline, 2nd ed. CLSI document M45-A2 CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bourke B, Chan VL, Sherman P. 1998. Campylobacter upsaliensis: waiting in the wings. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:440–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vandenberg O, Houf K, Douat N, Vlaes L, Retore P, Butzler JP, Dediste A. 2006. Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of non-jejuni/coli campylobacters and arcobacters from Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:908–913. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Couturier BA, Hale DC, Couturier MR. 2012. Association of Campylobacter upsaliensis with persistent bloody diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 50:3792–3794. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01807-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goossens H, Pot B, Vlaes L, Van den Borre C, Van den Abbeele R, Van Naelten C, Levy J, Cogniau H, Marbehant P, Verhoef J. 1990. Characterization and description of “Campylobacter upsaliensis” isolated from human feces. J Clin Microbiol 28:1039–1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goossens H, Vlaes L, Butzler JP, Adnet A, Hanicq P, N′Jufom S, Massart D, de Schrijver G, Blomme W. 1991. Campylobacter upsaliensis enteritis associated with canine infections. Lancet 337:1486–1487. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93182-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Man SM. 2011. The clinical importance of emerging Campylobacter species. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:669–685. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gurgan T, Diker KS. 1994. Abortion associated with Campylobacter upsaliensis. J Clin Microbiol 32:3093–3094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Damborg P, Guardabassi L, Pedersen K, Kokotovic B. 2008. Comparative analysis of human and canine Campylobacter upsaliensis isolates by amplified fragment length polymorphism. J Clin Microbiol 46:1504–1506. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00079-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goossens H, Giesendorf BA, Vandamme P, Vlaes L, Van den Borre C, Koeken A, Quint WG, Blomme W, Hanicq P, Koster DS, Hofstra H, Butzler J-P, Van der Plas J. 1995. Investigation of an outbreak of Campylobacter upsaliensis in day care centers in Brussels: analysis of relationships among isolates by phenotypic and genotypic typing methods. J Infect Dis 172:1298–1305. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.5.1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lastovica AJ, Le Roux E, Penner JL. 1989. “Campylobacter upsaliensis” isolated from blood cultures of pediatric patients. J Clin Microbiol 27:657–659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jenkin GA, Tee W. 1998. Campylobacter upsaliensis-associated diarrhea in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis 27:816–821. doi: 10.1086/514957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Patton CM, Shaffer N, Edmonds P, Barrett TJ, Lambert MA, Baker C, Perlman DM, Brenner DJ. 1989. Human disease associated with “Campylobacter upsaliensis” (catalase-negative or weakly positive Campylobacter species) in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 27:66–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Issartel B, Pariset C, Roure C, Boibieux A, Peyramond D. 2002. Successful treatment of prosthetic knee infection due to Campylobacter upsaliensis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 21:234–235. doi: 10.1007/s10096-001-0693-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carter JE, Cimolai N. 1996. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome associated with acute Campylobacter upsaliensis gastroenteritis. Nephron 74:489. doi: 10.1159/000189403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goddard EA, Lastovica AJ, Argent AC. 1997. Campylobacter 0:41 isolation in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Arch Dis Child 76:526–528. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.6.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ho TW, Hsieh ST, Nachamkin I, Willison HJ, Sheikh K, Kiehlbauch J, Flanigan K, McArthur JC, Cornblath DR, McKhann GM, Griffin JW. 1997. Motor nerve terminal degeneration provides a potential mechanism for rapid recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy after Campylobacter infection. Neurology 48:717–724. doi: 10.1212/WNL.48.3.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gaudreau C, Lamothe F. 1992. Campylobacter upsaliensis isolated from a breast abscess. J Clin Microbiol 30:1354–1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES