Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy of clotrimazole, miconazole and fluconazole in empirical treatment of otomycosis in our tertiary care hospital and to appraise possible better outcome in otomycosis. Two hundred and ninety five patients who presented with clinical otomycosis at our Melmaruvathur Adiparasakthi Institute of medical sciences were incorporated in this study. Two hundred and fourteen patients who satisfied our criteria were recognized and they were randomly alienated into three groups A, B, C. Group A patients were advised to instill clotrimazole ear drops by themselves. Miconazole cream instillation were done by our trained personal in group B patients. Group C patients were advised to use fluconazole ear drops. Patients were educated to keep ear dry and instructed to come for evaluation in first and second week after initial visit. A randomized double blinded prospective study. In the first week, clotrimazole had a good response than miconazole and fluconazole in our patients and in the second week, our patients showed a drastic response in patients instilling flucanozole ear drops compared to those using micanozole and clotrimazole. This better outcome doesn’t show statistical significance since p value is 0.882. Clotrimazole drops, miconazole cream and Fluconazole drops showed almost same therapeutic efficacy in Otomycosis
Keywords: Otomycosis, Topical antifungals, Miconazole, Topical azoles, Fungal otitis externa
Introduction
Otomycosis is the term coined to denote fungal infection of the external auditory canal. Nowadays it is one of the common clinical conditions seen in otorhinolaryngology department due to widespread usage of broad spectrum antibiotics, steroids and antibiotic ear drops [1]. Prevalence of otomycosis depends on geographical area (well seen in tropical and subtropical humid climates) and environmental factors like temperature, humidity and time of the year. Naturally cerumen has a protective role against the growth of fungi and bacteria due to its contents [2], but Raymanundo Munguia accused cerumen as a supporting element for fungal growth [3]. Aspergillus and candida are the common organisms found in otomycosis. Aspergillus Niger is found to be predominant organism [4, 5].
Controversy exists in between the authors regarding the selection of treatment in otomycosis. Some authors believe that treatment of otomycosis depends on the identification of species and its suspectibility [6, 7]. Another set of authors suggested that treatment depends on the drug’s efficacy regardless of the causative agent [8, 9]. Pertaining to treatment of otomycosis, various topical antifungal agents are available in markets. Many authors conducted both in vivo and in vitro studies for otomycosis. Nystatin, azole group, ciclopiroxolame, tolnaftate, mercurochrome, aluminium acetate drops [10], cresylate drops [10], boric acid [11] were used in vivo studies. Aqueous garlic extract [12], concentrated garlic oil [12], amphotericin, itraconazole, voriconazole [13], terbinafine [14] were tried in vitro studies. We were very interested to conduct a study in otomycosis and compare the clinical outcome of three easily available topical azoles i.e. clotrimazole drops, miconazole cream and fluconazole drops.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted in our hospital from September 2012 to April 2013. 295 patients of age (10–74) years who presented with clinical otomycosis were enrolled in this study. The criterion of clinical otomycosis was distinctive findings on otoscopic examination. The classical appearance was either grayish white mass similar to wet blotting paper or blackish spores in the external auditory canal. Patients with chronic suppurative otitis media, those who underwent surgery for chronic discharging ear and patients with bilateral disease were excluded from our study.
Detailed history were taken from two hundred and fourteen patients who fulfilled our criteria. Then samples were collected and sent to microbiological department for fungal identification and culture inoculation. Aural toileting were done in all the patients with suction in the OP department itself. To ensure double blindness and proper administration of medication, a trained nursing assistant, who was not involved in evaluating the patients was utilized. She grouped the patients randomly, applied the first dose of ear medication and instructed the patients to avoid water entering into their ears. Group A (72) patients were advised to instil clotrimazole 1 % ear drops, 3–5 drops three times a day. Group B (71) patients were treated with two application of miconazole cream, once during initial visit and second application during first week review for persistent disease. Miconazole was applied in the external auditory canal by loading in a 2 cc syringe attached with a regular 18 gauge suction tip. The viscosity of micanozole cream and the shape of the external auditory canal were considered to play a vital role in holding micanozole. Group C (71) patients were instructed to use fluconazole drops, 3–5 drops three times a day in affected ear. All of them were followed up in the end of first and second week. The patients and investigators remained blinded throughout the study.
Response to the treatment in three groups are tabulated as follows
Good response: External auditory canal is dry.
Moderate response: External auditory canal is filled with minimal secretion.
No response: External auditory canal is filled with full secretion.
Results
Out of 214 patients in our study, 128 (59 %) patients were female and 86 (41 %) patients were male. Right ear (67 %) involvement is more than left ear. The presenting complaints of otomycosis in the descending order are as follows: ear pain (49 %), ear block (28 %), ear itching (15 %) and ear discharge (8 %). All the 214 patients were randomly divided into three groups i.e. A, B, C (Fig. 1) and they were instructed to come for follow up in first week (Table 1).
Fig. 1.
Distribution of patients in three groups
Table 1.
Attendance of patients in first week review
Follow up | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|
Absent | 37 | 17.3 |
Reviewed | 177 | 82.7 |
Total | 214 | 100.0 |
Reports of all those in three groups i.e. microbiological confirmation of fungal growth either in smear identification or culture growth were collected (Table 2). Out of 214 patients, 116 (54.2 %) patients had aspergillus niger, Candida albicans in 53 (24.7 %), Aspergillus flavus in 9 (4.2 %), Aspergillus fumigatus in 6 (2.8 %), but 30 patients (14 %) had no fungal elements.
Table 2.
Microbiolgical results in total subjects
Microbiological confirmation of fungus | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Positive | 184 | 85.99 |
Negative | 30 | 14.01 |
Total | 214 | 100.0 |
One hundred and seventy seven patients who attended our OP department in the first week, 19 patients came with negative report in microbiological analysis of fungus (Table 3) and remaining 158 patients were advised for second week review (Table 4).
Table 3.
Microbiolgical results in combination with first week attendance
Follow up | Positive frequency | Percent | Negative | Percentage | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absent | 26 | 70.27 | 11 | 29.73 | 37 |
Reviewed | 158 | 89.27 | 19 | 10.73 | 177 |
Total | 184 | 85.98 | 30 | 14.02 | 214 |
Table 4.
Attendance in second week review
Follow up | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|
Absent | 13 | 8.23 |
Reviewed | 145 | 91.77 |
Total | 158 | 100.00 |
The treatment response in in the first and second week visits were properly collected (Table 5). In the first week follow up, Group A (Clotrimazole) has a good response than Group B (miconazole) which is followed by Group C (fluconazole). Surprisingly in the second week, Group C (flucanozole) had a good response than Group A (Clotrimazole) which is followed by Group B (miconazole).
Table 5.
Treatment response in three groups
First week | Total | By using Friedman test P value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No response | Moderate response | Good response | ||||||||
Count | % | Count | % | Count | % | Count | Total % of the study population | |||
First week | ||||||||||
A | Clotrimazole | 13 | 25.49 | 15 | 29.41 | 23 | 45.10 | 51 | 32.28 | 0.371 |
B | Miconazole | 16 | 29.09 | 17 | 30.91 | 22 | 35.42 | 55 | 34.81 | |
C | Fluconazole | 17 | 32.69 | 21 | 40.38 | 14 | 28.89 | 52 | 32.91 | |
Total | 46 | 29.11 | 53 | 33.54 | 59 | 37.34 | 158 | 100 | ||
Second week | ||||||||||
A | Clotrimazole | 4 | 8.70 | 5 | 6.82 | 37 | 83.00 | 46 | 31.72 | |
B | Miconazole | 3 | 6.00 | 4 | 12.77 | 43 | 81.60 | 50 | 34.48 | 0.882 |
C | Fluconazole | 2 | 4.08 | 4 | 6.98 | 43 | 84.30 | 49 | 33.79 | |
Total | 9 | 6.21 | 13 | 8.97 | 123 | 84.83 | 145 | 100 |
Discussion
We conducted this study because otomycosis is a very common condition in our OP department. This disease is well prevalent in people coming from rural area surrounding our institution. There is a female predominance (59 %) in our study, which well correlates with the studies by Jia X [15] and Yehia MM [16]. The most common presenting complaint in our study is ear pain, which is same in Tang Ho study [10], but Kurshid Anwar coded hearing loss as the most common presentation in otomycosis [17]. Right ear involvement is appreciated more in our study which may be because of ear manipulation with unsterile objects to alleviate ear itching in right handed individuals. Sathish also described right ear predominance in the involvement of otomycosis [18]. We got histories of oil instillation, scratching with sharp instruments like keys, hairpins in the ear canal, turban usage while working in agricultural fields in our patients. This triggered us to evaluate predisposing factors in detail and local practices to clean the ear. The major predisposing factors in 184 microbiological positive cases were ear trauma (63.6 %), eardrops and oil instillation (51.6 %), turban usage (34.7 %) and swimming (16.8 %). Ashish kumar expressed concomitant dermatomycosis as the commonest predisposing factor and swimming as the least predisposing factor [19]. In our study, we have not seen even one single case of associated dermatomycosis.
All the patients with clinical otomycosis were routinely treated with antifungal topical medication even without sending to microbiological examination. We were surprised to view the negative microbiological results in 14 % of clinical diagnosed otomycosis, which is also documented by Ahmad Yaganeh moghadam [20] in his study.
Solubility, viscosity, tonicity, surfactant and preservatives were usually considered in the preparation of topical ear medications. Viscosity is very important in keeping the medication to work in the ear canal. Thin medication will easily drain out of the ear canal whereas thick medication won’t reach inner recess of the ear. There is always many merits and demerits in using various types of topical medications. Cream is roughly a mixture of half water and hair oil. Cream formulation will spreads easily, it will be well absorbed and less sticky compared to ointments. So it is very useful in treating oozing and “wet” skin conditions like otomycosis. Ointments has 80 % oil and 20 % water content which helps in treating “dry” conditions in skin. We selected miconazole in cream base for our study because of well absorption. While using Clotrimazole drops (oil base), Fluconazole (water base), we advised our patients to maintain head position for 5 min after instillation of ear drops.
In the first week of follow up, we elicited best results with clotrimazole among the three groups. Sufian Alnawaiseh found a good response with micanozole cream than clotrimazole drops in the whole of the 2 week study [21]. we were surprised to see good response with fluconazole than others in the second week, which very well correlates with Sathish study [18]. Though Fluconazole exhibited good response in our study comparing with miconazole cream and clotrimazole, this difference doesn’t show statistical significance since p value is 0.882. This insignificant statistical response may be because of small scale study and patient’s noncompliance in review. Our comparison of three azole antifungal groups in three different forms (water base, oil base, cream base) shows almost the same therapeutic effects in otomycosis. Though we are discussing more about the topical antifungals, there may be need of aggressive systemic antifungal therapy in immunocompromised patients because of possibility of invasive otomycosis
Conclusion
Clotrimazole drops, miconazole cream and Fluconazole drops had same therapeutic efficacy in our study. So we have a liberty to choose any one of topical azoles in otomycosis and also they are considered to be safe since they had no ototoxic property which was already proved by many authors.
Contributor Information
Nagendran Navaneethan, Email: naugendran@yahoo.com.
Raj Prakash Dharmapuri YaadhavaKrishnan, Email: dyrajprakash@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Chander J, Maini S, Subrahmanyan S, et al. Otomycosis—a clinic-mycological study and efficacy of mercurochrome in its treatment. Mycopathologia. 1996;135:9–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00436569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pando J. Estudio epidemiologico de la otitis externa en la provincial de Badajoz. ORL Dips. 1989;5:270–273. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Munguia Raymanundo, Sam J. Ototopical antifungals and otomycosis: A review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gutierrez P, Alvarez J, Sanudo E, et al. Presumed diagnosis: Otomycosis. A study of 451 patients. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2005;56:181–186. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6519(05)78597-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoshino T, Matsumoto M. Otomycosis: Subdermal growth in calcified mass. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:875–878. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bassiouny A, Kamel T, Moawad MK, Hindawy DS. Broad spectrum antifungal agents in otomycosis. J Laryngol Otol. 1986;100:867–873. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100100246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arthur RR, Drew RH, Perfect JR. Novel modes of antifungal drug administration. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2004;13:903–932. doi: 10.1517/13543784.13.8.903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Araiza J, Canseco P, Bonifaz A. Otomycosis: clinical and mycological study of 97 cases. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol(Bord) 2006;127:251–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blyth CC, Palasanthiran P, O’Brien TA. Antifungal therapy in children with invasive fungal infections: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2007;119:772–784. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tang Ho MD, Jeffery VT Rabec MD, Donald Yoo BS, Newton J coker MD (2006) Otolarnyngol Head and Neck surgery, 135(5): 787–791 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Del Palacio A, Cuétara MS, López-Suso MJ, Amor E, Garau M. Randomized prospective comparative study: short-term treatment with ciclopiroxolamine (cream and solution) versus boric acid in the treatment of otomycosis. Mycoses. 2002;45:317–328. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2002.00737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pai ST, Platt MW. Antifungal effects of Allium sativum (garlic) extract against the Aspergillus species involved in otomycosis. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995;20:14–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb00397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaya AD, Kiraz N. In vitro susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. causing otomycosis to amphotericin B, voriconazole and itraconazole. Mycoses. 2007;50:447–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karaarslan A, Arikan S, Ozcan M, Ozcan KM. In vitro activity of terbinafine and itraconazole against Aspergillus species isolated from otomycosis. Mycoses. 2004;47:284–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.00988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jia X, Liang Q, Chi F, Cao W. Otomycosis in Shanghai: aetiology, clinical features and therapy. Mycoses. 2012;55(5):404–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yehia MM, al-Habib HM, Shehab NM. Otomycosis: a common problem in north Iraq. J Laryngol Otol. 1990;104(5):387–389. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100158529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anwar K, Gohar MS. Otomycosis; clinical features, predisposing factors and treatment implications. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(3):564–567. doi: 10.12669/pjms.303.4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sathish HS, Vishwanatha B, Manjuladevi M. IOSR J Dent Med sci. 2013;5(2):57–62. doi: 10.9790/0853-0525762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kumar A. Fungal spectrum in otomycosis patients. JK Sci. 2005;7(3):152–155. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yaganeh MA, Asadi M, Dehghani R, Zarei MA, Rayegan F, Hossein H, Khorshidi A. Evaluating the effects of mixture of alcohol and acetic acid for otomycosis therapy. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010;3(2):66–70. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alnawaiseh S, Almomani O, Alassaf S, Elessis A, Shawakfeh N, Altubeshi K, Akaileh R. Treatment of otomycosis: a comparative study using miconozole cream with clotrimazole otic drops. JRMS. 2011;18(3):34–37. [Google Scholar]