Skip to main content
BioImpacts : BI logoLink to BioImpacts : BI
. 2014 Nov 22;4(4):205–215. doi: 10.15171/bi.2014.015

Nanoscaled aptasensors for multi-analyte sensing

Mehdi Saberian-Borujeni 1,, Mohammad Johari-Ahar 1,, Hossein Hamzeiy 1, Jaleh Barar 1, Yadollah Omidi 1,*
PMCID: PMC4298712  PMID: 25671177

Abstract

graphic file with name BI-4-205-g008.jpg

Introduction: Nanoscaled aptamers (Aps), as short single-stranded DNA or RNA oligonucleotides, are able to bind to their specific targets with high affinity, upon which they are considered as powerful diagnostic and analytical sensing tools (the so-called "aptasensors"). Aptamers are selected from a random pool of oligonucleotides through a procedure known as "systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment".

Methods: In this work, the most recent studies in the field of aptasensors are reviewed and discussed with a main focus on the potential of aptasensors for the multianalyte detection(s).

Results: Due to the specific folding capability of aptamers in the presence of analyte, aptasensors have substantially successfully been exploited for the detection of a wide range of small and large molecules (e.g., drugs and their metabolites, toxins, and associated biomarkers in various diseases) at very low concentrations in the biological fluids/samples even in presence of interfering species.

Conclusion: Biological samples are generally considered as complexes in the real biological media. Hence, the development of aptasensors with capability to determine various targets simultaneously within a biological matrix seems to be our main challenge. To this end, integration of various key scientific dominions such as bioengineering and systems biology with biomedical researches are inevitable.

Keywords: Aptamer, Aptasensor, Biosensor, Multi-analyte detection, SELEX

Introduction

Aptamers (Aps) are short single-stranded sequences of RNA or DNA, which have the capability of specific binding to given target(s) through electrostatic interactions, Van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, or combination of these interaction phenomena by forming a spatial structure.1,2 Because of the specific three-dimensional (3D) architecture, aptamers display unique folded states with high affinity and specificity to a wide range of biotargets such as drugs,3 toxins,4 peptides,5 proteins,6 , 7 organic compounds8,9 or even complete cells.10 Aps have several advantages over the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Because of being smaller than mAbs, aptamers can be immobilized on the surface of electrodes in a denser pattern. Also, the physicochemical and biological stability of DNA Aps (but not the unmodified RNA Aps) are greater than that of mAbs. Further, the SELEX process on which Aps are selected is more cost-effective than the process used for the selection of mAbs.11 Such unique properties make aptamers very attractive targeting entities that can be used for the sensitive detection of molecular markers involved in various diseases.12-24

Further, it has been reported that Aps are able to inhibit different kinds of functional proteins through competitive or non-competitive mechanisms or by hindering their regulatory regions. Aps, in addition to being candidates for therapeutic aims,25 can be considered as suitable elements for the analysis of functional proteins as well as the validation of biotargets.26 Nowadays, Aps have been used not only as homing devices for efficient delivery of therapeutics27-29 and clear-cut sensing,30 but also as therapeutic agents.31-34

This review provides an overview upon the sensing potential of aptamers towards simultaneous detection of multiple biotargets.

SELEX

As a powerful technique for the selection of specific aptamer(s) against a given target, SELEX exploits potential of chemically synthesized nucleic acid library (with approximately 1014–1015 different random DNA or RNA sequences). This technology has widely been used for the selection of therapeutic Aps. It should be noted that the SELEX technology is a complex process with several iterative cycles consisting of (a) absorption of DNA or RNA sequences, (b) recovery of bound DNA or RNA, and (c) amplification of selected sequences via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Taken all, methodologically, the incubation of a designated library with an immobilized or free target in several rounds can result in the isolation of a number of oligomer sequences with high affinity and specificity to a given target.35 Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of in vitro SELEX process (panel A) and an aptasensor application (panel B) .

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representaion of SELEX process and aptasensor. A) Selection of aptamer against a target using systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). B) Sensing of a given target by aptasensor. Note: not drawn to scale.

Aptasensors

Chemical sensors are defined as devices that are able to transform analogue data produced from the sensing of a specific chemical target into measurable digital signals. Technically, a chemical sensor includes a receptor and a transducer as the main components, in which the first part recognizes a particular analyte while the second receives information from the receptor and translates it into detectable signal(s). According to such description, biosensors epitomize the sensors that use biomolecules such as mAbs, Ab fragments, nucleic acids (DNA/RNA Aps), or other biological compartments as recognition probe to transform finally into electrical signals.36 Among them, DNA/RNA aptasensors have attracted great deal of attention because of their ability to interact with a broad range of small molecules and macromolecules as well as higher stability, sensitivity and specificity. Aptasensors can sense the presence of a designated target analyte through the measurement of changes in mass, electrical, optical or electrochemical properties of the recognition unit monitored by means of detectors.37,38 It seems that optical and electrochemical aptasensors are much more common than those used for the analytical purposes, even though the development of electrical and mass based sensing tools will continue to grow. The emergence of aptamers in 1990 as novel and valuable sensing probes led to development of the first aptasensor which was engineered based on an optical method in 199637 Photon transmission phenomenon and production of a detectable signal based on the complexation of Ap with its target is the central mechanism of optical aptasensors. While some aptasensors need to be labeled with chromophores, some approaches, e.g. surface plasmon resonance (SPR), do not require any label for the detection of target(s).39,40 Further, Ap beacons, which have substantially been implemented as biomolecular recognition tools in biological studies, epitomize the labeled aptasensors. An aptamer beacon consists of an Ap sequence with an attached fluorophore at one end and a quencher at the other end. The nature of such beacons structure keeps the fluorophore and the quencher close to each other, and this proximity of fluorophore and quencher prevents the fluorescence signal to be created. However, the presence of target, which imposes a structural change in the 3D conformation of aptamer, increases the distance between the fluorophore and the quencher and causes a fluorescence signal. A large variety of Ap beacons have been designed for analytical applications, including double strand beacons, immobilized Ap beacons on a support, and signal off beacons developed based on the reduction in final intensity of fluorescence signals in the presence of target analyte.41-50 As mentioned previously, SPR-based biosensors are powerful optical sensing tools that have successfully been used for the detection of a wide array of biotargets. Moreover, a number of aptasensors have been developed based on SPR including aptasensors designed for the detection of avian influenza virus H5N1,51 human immunoglobulin E,52 interferon-gamma53, and mammalian eukaryotic initiation factor 4A.54

The application of optical aptasensors, which has been proposed since 1996, was introduced earlier than those of the electrochemical aptasensors that have been reported more recently in 2004. The electrochemical aptasensors are mainly classified into (a) amperometry, (b) potentiometry, (c) voltammetry, and (d) coulometry sensing techniques. Because of the simplicity of engineering together with high stability, the electrochemical aptasensors have been in the center of attention in the recent years.55,56

Classically, the electrochemical oxidation or reduction of the chemical electroactive species produces a measurable current that has been delineated as the basis of the amperometry technique. It has widely been used for the sensing of biological processes such as exocytotic events,57,58 the status of metabolism and biophysical flux in the tissue and cellular or molecular domains,59 and for the analysis of drugs.60 The potentiometry technique as another electrochemical method is based on the measurement of potential difference between working and reference electrodes when no significant current flows between them. It can be exploited for the analysis of a vast variety of target molecules because it offers a cost-effective portable platform with capability to measure continuously, even though its inability to detect small amount of analyte in some conditions is the major limitation of this method.61,62 Further, the potentiometry sensing approach as a good paradigm of biosensing has been used for the detection of genomic targets. For example, the hybridization of probe DNA and target DNA can be monitored through the recording of potential changes during the reaction process and a significant light addressable potentiometric sensor (LAPS) signal, which is able to even detect trivial amount of target DNA.63

Moreover, the field-effect transistors (FETs), as a powerful subset means for the electrochemical method, have successfully been used for the development of biosensors for the detection of molecular markers such as lysozyme and thrombin.64 Of these, the silicon nanowire FETs are deemed to provide a promising tool for label-free biosensing, in part due to their real-time detection capabilities with their ultrasensitivity and selectivity.

Multi-analyte detection by aptamers

Despite substantial progresses in development of aptasensors in the last decade, most of them have been shown to be capable of detecting single analyte in pure samples. However, the world of real samples deviates largely from the simplicity of the experimental conditions, and approximately all real samples are complex systems mixed with impurities that may interfere with the detection of single analyte. For example, in the biological body fluids (blood, serum or urine), biomarkers are found in complex fluidic system. Therefore, designing and engineering aptasensors with ability to target a particular analyte are of vital importance. This would be much more pivotal for the simultaneous detection of several biomarkers within the complex biological fluids. Taken all, improvement of methods for the detection of multi-analyte could save time and cost and also provide much more detailed information on array of biotargets. Unfortunately, up until now, few multi-analyte aptasensors have been introduced though there is a common consensus upon the impacts of highly sensitive, selective and easy to use biosensing methods for the concurrent detection of several biotargets. To the best of our knowledge, among the designed multi-analyte aptasensors, detection via optical and electrochemical methods appear to provide much faster and easier means as the next generation biosensing systems that are able to disclose the main pattern of the candidate biotargets in different diseases or even for biodefense purposes. Thus, we will discuss some important aspects of these methods.

Optical multi-analyte detection strategies

Among biosensing methods, great devotion has been given to the fabrication of multi-analyte aptasensors by means of optical detection devices. For example, in 2003, McCauley et al.65 have developed a fluorescence-based aptasensor-chip for the simultaneous detection of thrombin, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in complex samples. In this study, all of the Aps were modified by a biotin group via a 12-carbon spacer at the 5ˊ position for immobilization on a streptavidin-glass surface and a fluorescein group at the 3’ end as detecting element. It should be pinpointed that the main detection method for Ap-analyte binding assay was based on the fluorescence polarization change upon the binding of targets to the corresponding Aps. This phenomenon occurs because of an alteration in the rotation of Aps upon the formation of Ap-target complex, and hence the resultant fluorescent polarization could be measured as an indicative to the concentration of analyte in the samples. In the multi-analyte format, since the different aptamers were immobilized on specific position of chips, the analyte of interest could be detected via calculation of the exact position of the response signal on the surface of chips.

In another strategy, fluorescence Ap-based array was designed by the labeling of target(s) instead of the labeling of Aps, and successfully applied for the detection of lysozyme and ricin by RNA Aps and IgE and thrombin by DNA Aps.66 In this sensor, the Aps were modified by biotin to be immobilized on the determined part of an avidin-coated glass slide, and then exposed to the related targets in pure/mixed solution. In both conditions, the aptasensor showed great ability towards detection of the analytes, while the concentration of target was measured through the intensity of fluorescence. Using this method, lysozyme was detected in picomolar concentration range, while ricin, IgE and thrombin were detected in nanomolar range. In fact, simplicity, sensitivity and time-saving and cost-effectiveness of the method make it very attractive strategy for the detection of multiple analytes. In a similar study, a bead-based aptasensor was devised for the detection of ricin and lysozyme using a single chip.67 First, biotinylated Aps were immobilized on the streptavidin agarose beads, and then the beads were loaded into the wells of a chip ( Fig. 2A). Labeled targets were added to the wells and the Aps-target complexation was detected via fluorescent labels ( Fig. 2B). This method seems to be able to detect the targets specifically, and could be reactivated after exposure to the targets.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of agarose bead aptasensors. A) The biotinylated aptemers are immobilized on streptavidin agarose beads, and loaded on a determined location of the chip. B) Presence of fluorescently labeled targets that can be detected upon aptamer-target complexation. For detailed information, reader is referred to the study performed by Ellington and coworkers.67 Note: not drawn to scale.

Since semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) as nonomaterials (NMs) with unique fluorescence properties have been able to emit different fluorescence wavelengths based on their sizes, they have attracted a lot of interest in medical and biological studies.68 This unique optical feature makes them appropriate NMs to design nanobiosensors, in particular optical multi-analyte biosensors.69-72 Having capitalized on the unique optical properties of QDs, Liu et al. have designed an aptasensor for the simultaneous detection of cocaine and adenosine.73 In their study, thiolated DNA sequences were used as anchor part, while Aps specific to adenosine and cocaine were immobilized on the surface of gold nanoparticls (AuNPs). Similarly, some biotinylated DNA sequences fixed on the surface of streptavidin-coated QDs were used as anchor for attaching QDs to the Aps ( Fig. 3A). In the absence of the target molecules, the DNA anchors form double stranded DNA structures that cause aggregation of AuNPs with QDs, and lead to quenching the luminescence of QDs. In the presence of the target molecules, the spatial structures of Aps change, resulting in disassembly of the AuNPs-QDs complex ( Fig. 3B). This phenomenon appears to intensify the emission that could simply be detected by the optical methods. The emission intensity is related to the target concentration, and since different QDs with different emission wavelengths were used in fabrication of this device, different types of analytes could be detected even in mixed samples. In this method, to design a double analyte biosensor, cocaine and adenosine aptasensors were prepared separately and mixed by 2:1 ratio for adenosine and cocaine, respectively. Such design makes the emission of two different QDs to be approximately the same in intensity. It has been claimed that even 10 distinct analytes could be detected simultaneously by this method, which could be used for either qualitative or quantitative detections.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic representation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and quantum dots (QDs) matrix. There are immobilized complementary strands on both surfaces of AuNPs and QDs. A) In the absence of target, complementary strands are coupled and form a matrix, resulting in the quenching of the QDs emission. B) Addition of target to the matrix-based biosensor induces the destruction of the matrix, leading to removal of the quenching effect and hence QDs emission. For detailed information, reader is referred to the study conducted by Yi Lu and coworkers.73 Note: not drawn to scale.

Since developing specific Aps for different binding site of some targets is feasible (especially for proteins), it is possible to develop the sandwich arrays by capitalizing on the Aps alone or in combination with mAbs.67,74 In fact, the Aps immobilized on beads can be introduced into micromachine chips on the electronic tongue sensor array, which can be utilized for the quantitative sensing of proteins in both capture and sandwich assay formats with possibility of multiple stripping and reusing steps. Hence, as a useful screening tool, sandwich Aps-based array can be exploited for a number of purposes. For example, Corn and coworkers have developed a methodology for the detection of protein biomarkers at picomolar concentrations using RNA Aps microarrays by means of the SPR imaging (SPRI) technique.74 To fabricate such systems, a DNA anchor was immobilized on the gold-coated surface via its 3’ thiolated terminal, and RNA Aps specific to thrombin and VEGF were then attached onto the immobilized anchors. When introduced to the target, thrombin attached not only to its specific Ap but also to its corresponding Ab that was added to the environment subsequently ( Fig. 4A). Because of being tagged with the horseradish peroxidase (HRP), these attachments lead to Ap-Ab-HRP complex formation that makes a localized surface precipitation after addition of the HRP substrate (i.e., 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine, TMB) into the environment. This surface precipitation could be detected by SPR method. In the presence of VEGF, the biosensor with a biotinylated VEGF Ab and an HRP-tagged anti-biotin Ab ( Fig. 4A) resulted in the complexation of anti-VEGF Ap, VEGF, biotinylated VEGF Ab and HRP-tagged anti-biotin Ab. Such complexation was able to elicit a localized surface precipitation reaction in presence of TMB. The main advantage of this method seems to be the obtaining a very sharp signal with high sensitivity as compared to the common SPR signals.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Schematic representation of biosensing based on sandwich aptamer-based array system. A) Sandwich aptamer-based array system. Localized horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) precipitation (A2) occurs because of the formation of array. The HRP-TMB precipitation is detected by SPR technique. B) Parallel detection of cocaine and AMP by spectrophotometric method. The DNAzyme sequence (B1) is inactivated by ATP and cocain aptamers. In the presence of targets, the DNAzyme sequence can be activated (B2), in which presence of hemin elecits oxidative catalytic activity resulting in alteration of ABTS2- to its colored form ABTS•- (B3) that can be then detected by spectrophotometric method. For detailed information, reader is referred to a study accomplished by Willner and Corn research groups.74,75 Note: not drawn to scale.

An article, which describes bifunctional spectrophotometric-based aptasensor, was published in 2008 reporting the parallel detection of cocaine and adenosine 5’-monophosphate (AMP).75 In this study, the specific Aps of AMP and cocaine were put in a unique sequence one after another, and hybridized with its complementary strand ( Fig. 4B). The complementary strand consisted of complementary sequences of AMP, cocaine Aps and an additional sequence with DNAzyme capability. In the presence of both AMP and cocaine, upon the Ap-target complexation, the stability of hybridized double strands appeared to be reduced resulting in the dissociation of the double strand structure. In this situation, the DNAzyme sequence can show HRP-mimicking activity in the presence of appropriate cofactor (hemin) in the environment ( Fig. 4B). This event can catalyze the oxidation of 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS2-), a substrate for peroxidase, to its colored form (ABTS•-), mediated by H2O2. Since ABTS•- production is related to DNAzyme function, the amount of ABTS•- can be considered as an indicative of the concentration of targets detectable by the spectrophotometric methods. For the confirmation of the results, an electrochemical measurement and faradic impedance spectroscopy were performed similarly by immobilizing the complementary sequences on the surface of a gold electrode. Then, the obtained data from electrochemical analyses confirmed the optical results.

Electrochemical multi-analyte detection strategies

Simplicity, high sensitivity, low cost, and high stability are some of the main advantages of electrochemical methods that make them versatile tools for the development of multi-analyte biosensing systems. In 2008, Erkang Wang and coworkers engineered an aptasensor specific to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and α-thrombin detection by utilizing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV).76 In the fabrication of this aptasensor, a thiolated DNA sequence was attached on the surface of a gold electrode as an anchor ( Fig. 5A). The main element of sensor (i.e., recognition sequence as a DNA sequence) consisted of three parts: (a) a short complementary sequence for hybridization with anchor sequence, (b) a DNA Ap sequence for ATP, and (c) a DNA Ap sequence for α-thrombin. Since some nucleotides in the ATP Ap and anchor sequence are complementary to each other, in the presence of ATP, the ATP Ap is affected by its corresponding target; hence the recognition sequence can be separated from the anchor part ( Fig. 5A). This phenomenon causes a reduction in the negative charge of the electrode surface due to the scattering of recognition sequence from the electrode surface. The created distance between the recognition sequence and the electrode surface can reduce the EIS signal depending on the concentration of ATP in the samples. In another approach, in the presence of α-thrombin, the recognition sequence remained hybridized with the anchor, while the α-thrombin-Ap complex formation resulted in an increase in the EIS signal owing to the blockage of the electrode surface by α-thrombin volume ( Fig. 5A). When the concentration of α-thrombin increases, the electron transfer resistance proportionally increases in part due to the accumulation of negative charges resulting from α-thrombin, hence the obtained EIS signals can be enhanced. It is worth to note that an excellent recovery of this biosensor is the outstanding characteristic of the established method.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Schematic representation of an electrochemical-based aptasensor. A) Anti-thrombin aptasensor as an anchor sequence immobilized on a gold electrode and a recognition sequence hybridized (A1). In the presence of ATP, the recognition sequence separates and the EIS signal reduces (A2). In contrast, in the presence of thrombin, the recognition sequence remains attached to the anchor and the thrombin causes an increase in EIS signal because of blocking the surface of electrode (A3). In the presence of both targets, aptasensor behaves differently (A4). B) A QD-based sandwich array. Aptamers specific to thrombin and lysozyme are immobilized on the electrode surface and conjugated by QD-tagged thrombin and lysozyme, respectively (B1). In the presence of naked targets, QD-tagged targets are released to the environment (B2) and can be measured via electrochemical methods (B3). For detailed information, reader is referred to a study conducted by Wang and coworkers.76 Note: not drawn to scale.

As highlighted previously, given that QDs possess remarkable optical features that make them powerful tool for electrochemical sensing, a large number of researchers have used these NMs to engineer applicable biosensors. Wang and coworkers introduced an interesting QD-based aptasensor for the detection of thrombin and lysozyme.77 In this study, cadmium and lead sulfide were successfully used as QD-tag for the detection of thrombin and lysozyme, respectively. The fabricated aptasensor was able to detect thrombin and lysozyme simultaneously in subpicomolar concentrations by means of the electrochemical method. Although this technique was devised based on a sandwich immunoassay technique, the method appeared to require only one step in comparison to the currently used sandwich assay methods which usually utilize two steps of analyses. This sensor showed high sensitivity and selectivity to thrombin and lysozyme in both single-pure and mixed samples. For the fabrication of this biosensor, thiolated Aps were immobilized on a gold electrode and conjugated with QD-tagged thrombin and lysozyme ( Fig. 5B). In the presence of naked targets (i.e., thrombin or lysozyme), the QD-tagged targets were separated from their corresponding folded Aps and easily released into the environment due to their lower affinity compared to that of the naked targets ( Fig. 5B). Therefore, the replaced amount can be straightforwardly measured using square-wave striping voltammetric method. The position of peaks on the voltammograms refers to the type of analyte while the height of the corresponding peak(s) is related to the concentration of each analyte ( Fig. 5B). The developed sensor could simultaneously recognize two different types of analyte even in the mixed media with high sensitivity. Similarly, Zhang and coworkers set up an Ap-based sensor for the parallel detection of adenosine and thrombin via anodic striping voltammetry (ASV) using cadmium and lead sulfide as recognition elements.78 The main part of this sensor (the so-called DNA linker sequence) was composed of (a) a complementary sequence for hybridization with DNA anchors sequences, (b) a specific Ap sequence for thrombin or adenosine, and (c) a sequence for DNA reporter sequences hybridization. In the basic form of biosensor, two different DNA sequences were immobilized on the surface of a gold electrode via their 3’ thiolated end as an anchor, and hybridized with linker sequences subsequently. Then, the DNA reporters (i.e., sequences attached to QD-tagged AuNPs) were hybridized with DNA linker sequences ( Fig. 6A). In the presence of targets, by changing in the structure of Aps ( Fig. 6A), the reporter sequences seemed to be released into the environment, which could be detected by ASV method ( Fig. 6A). This biosensing approach was reported to be a method with very low limit of detection (LOD) of adenosine in comparison with other studies.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Schematic representation of aptasensor conjugated with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and quantum dot (QDs). A) QD-based electrochemical aptasensor. The basic scheme of aptasensor includes anchor and reporter sequences (A1). Aptamer-target complex formation causes the QD-tagged AuNPs to be released into the environment that can be detected by ASV method subsequently (A2, A3, A4). B) Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based array format. Tile shape arranged aptamers on a support (B1). Line cross-section analysis of AFM images of unbound aptamers shows typical band for free aptamer (B2). Change in spatial structure of aptamers occurs in the presence of targets (B3). Line cross-section analysis of AFM images upon aptamer-target complex formation shows typical band for bound aptamer (B4). For detailed information, reader is referred to a study conducted by Zhang and Yan research groups.78,79 Note: not drawn to scale.

Miscellaneous strategies for multi-analyte detection

Although optical and electrochemical methods are more common in designing biosensors, there exist few multi-analyte sensing strategies that use other methods. The DNA nanoarray device for α-thrombin and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) is an interesting example.79

Chhabra et al. engineered a specific Ap-based sensing system for the detection of α-thrombin and PDGF using a support in a tile shape ( Fig. 6B). In the presence of targets, on account of the formation of Ap-target complex, the primary shape of Aps changes which can be detected by atomic force microscopy (AFM). This biosensor was shown to determine the presence of α-thrombin and PDGF either in pure or in mixed samples showing no/little interference with each other in an array format.

In 2003, Ellington and coworkers introduced a method which was able to detect different kinds of analytes concurrently through ribozyme ligases.80 In this study, specific Aps for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), theophylline, and three other analytes were appended to a radiolabeled ribozyme ligase, engineering a biosensing system the so-called aptazyme ( Fig. 7A). In this interesting system, the aptameric part acted as an effector for the aptazyme, which was able to cause a biotinylated substrate to ligate in the presence of the related target. The ligated biotinylated aptazymes were immobilized subsequently on a streptavidine-coated support. After thorough washing steps, the unbound aptazymes were eliminated from the environment and the radioactivity of the labeled aptazymes was detected. It should be noted that in this method, the location of aptazymes on the plate refers to a specific analyte and the intensity of radiation is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. Detection of different kinds of analytes even small molecules with low LOD seems to be the main advantage of this method.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Schematic representation of aptazyme array sensing system. A) An aptazyme ligase array. Radio-labeled aptazymes and biotinylated substrates are present in the environment separately (A1). In the presence of target, upon target-aptamer complexation, the biotinylated substrates can be ligated to the aptazymes and immobilized on the support via biotin-streptavidin attachment subsequently (A2). The radioactivity of immobilized aptazymes can be detected after appropriate washing steps. B) Molecular Barcode method. Capture sequences are immobilized on the streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, and in the presence of targets can form the sandwich complex as capture sequence-target-sensing sequence (B1). By performing appropriate washing steps, the unbound sensing sequences are eliminated from the environment (B2). The sensing sequences within the sandwich complex are separated and amplified by PCR method (B3). The PCR products can be run into an electrophoresis gel and the spots on the gel represent the specific sensing sequences because of their different length (B4). For detailed information, reader is referred to a study conducted by Ellington and Walton research groups.80,81 Note: not drawn to scale.

Combination of molecular barcodes and double aptamer sandwich assay is another strategy used by Walton for simultaneous detection of thrombin and platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB).81 This study was undertaken using (a) an Ap in capture sequence structure and (b) an Ap in sensing sequence structure. The capture sequences were comprised of an Ap specific for thrombin or PDGF-BB as well as a biotinylated sequence for immobilization on the streptavidin-coated magnetic beads ( Fig. 7B). The sensing sequence, which also functioned as a detector element, was composed of three sequences (a) a sequence for PCR, (b) a sequence as molecular barcode, and (c) an Ap sequence specific for thrombin or PDGF-BB. In the presence of targets, every target can attach to its own capture Ap via its primary binding site and the sensing Ap can attach to the secondary binding site of the target. After sandwich complex formation, thorough washing is performed to eliminate the unbound sensing sequences from the environment. The attached sensing sequences can be then separated from the targets and amplified via PCR subsequently ( Fig. 7B). The electrophoresis analysis showed different spots on the gel for thrombin or PDGF-BB sensing sequences in part due to different sizes of sensing sequences ( Fig. 7B). Considering all these features, the method seems to be a suitable biosensing paradigm for simultaneous detection of different analytes even in the mixed samples.

Aptamer-based multi-analyte detection challenges

So far, development of sensors with ability to simultaneously detect several analytes in the complex biological media has attracted lots of interests. Nonetheless, it seems that this scientific frontier needs to be reshaped towards multi-analyte aptamer array systems for concurrent detection of life and/or disease signals. Despite fascinating methods currently implemented for bioconjugation, hybridization and immobilization of oligonucleotides on the related surfaces (gold, glass, carbon, and other solid surfaces and supports), the dominion of biosensing demands miniaturized automated spotting robots for the development of seamless lab-on-chip systems. It seems we also need to improve the bioconjugation process which happens to be the main pitfall for the engineering of biosensors. In fact, robust concurrent and/or successive immobilization of different aptamers on a single support such as chip surfaces can significantly improve the multi-analyte detection strategies. The binding condition of aptamers could be affected by pH, temperature, and ionic changes, which may influence the binding efficacy of the aptamers to the surface.82 It should be stated that although some methods introduce several procedures that are able to withstand the pH and ionic changes in experimental conditions, further developments for efficient immobilization seem to be inevitable. Difference in the length of aptamers’ sequences, which have been immobilized on single supports, is another problem in the fabrication of multi-aptamer array chip systems. Since every aptamer has its own sequence and length, considerable difference in aptamers length may lead to interaction between adjacent immobilized Aps. This phenomenon may occur via excluding the aptamer-analyte complex formation of adjacent Aps by preventing spatial structure formation (e.g., through the electrical charge of the aptamers). The size of Aps could influence their attachment capability on surface, and accordingly long aptamers may be separated easily from the surface of the support than Aps with shorter length.83

It is note worthy that single chips with capability of multi-analyte detection appear to be (a) quicker in detection, (b) easier to use, and (c) cheaper to prepare in comparison with single-analyte chips.84 The RNA-based aptasensors have an important problem, that is, they are highly sensitive to be degraded by the ribonuclease. Therefore, the RNA-based aptasensors are not re-generable in biological samples that contain endogenous ribonuclease. Hence, these biosensors are used solely for the single-use detection. This problem clearly influences cost-benefit of chips which contain RNA-aptamer sequences. However, in some cases, modified RNA aptamers could solve this problem.65 Commonly, every aptamer needs its special environment and condition for the optimum action and target-aptamer complex formation, thus changes in pH and ionic concentration can affect the complex.82

It should be pinpointed that the aptamer-target complex formation is related to the affinity of Aps and biotargets, in which each aptamer-target complex has its own KD that determines the affinity of this complex.81 Therefore, in designing multiple analyte biosensors, the affinity factor must be taken into account while the density of each Ap on chips seem to be proportional to its KD.

Of note, in the fabrication of multi-aptamer electrodes and chips, it is necessary to use Aps that work in the same condition (e.g., pH, temperature, ionic strength, etc.). Besides, they should also have similar sustainable washing and drying steps. This would be somehow problematic because each Ap per se needs to be separately optimized towards its best operational condition. Unlike multi-analyte aptasensors, handling the readout is less problematic in single-analyte biosensors. Depending on the sensing methodology, readout in multi-analyte systems need a careful design in terms of both hardware and software, since such system must process different detectable signals at the same time. Technologies involved in microarray or next generation sequencing may provide an important medium for devising biosensing arrays.

Final remarks and future prospects of aptasensors

Currently used hardwares in biosensing process seem to be bulky and sophisticated equipments, while biosensing systems need to be improved towards daily-used portable life-supporting devices. It could be imaginable that, in the future, our mobile phone may be equipped with a sensing system to monitor key biofunctions with capabilities to analyze the raw readouts, to normalize the resultant data and to report the endpoint outcomes. This results in real-time monitoring of the health or disease condition for each individual – an approach the so-called personalized life-monitoring system. This may sound “fiction” rather than “science”. Nevertheless, personalized cell therapy has already been put in practice as reported for sipuleucel-T (APC8015/Provenge™) developed by Dendreon Corporation (Seattle, USA) as a cell-based cancer immunotherapy through customized programming of dendritic cells of prostate cancer patients.85 Recently, Liu et al. introduced a promising method for the production of Ap-based dipsticks for sensing cocaine and lead.86,87

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Dr. Saeed Ghasemi (Tabriz University of Medical Sciences), Dr. Fatemeh Ahmadi (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) and Dr. Daryoush Abedi (Isfahan University of Medical Sciences) for their valuable comments.

Ethical issues

No ethical issues to be declared.

Competing interests

There is none to be disclosed.

Review Highlights

What is current knowledge?

  • √ Nanoscaled aptamers are short single-stranded DNA/RNA oligonucleotides capable of specific affinity to bind to a wide range of biotargets.

  • √ Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) is the main approach for the selection of aptamers.

  • √ Aptamers have been used as diagnostic and analytical sensing tools known as “aptasensors”.

  • √ Multi-analyte detection of drugs, metabolites, toxins, microorganisms and biomarkers can be conducted by aptasensors.

What is new here?

  • √ DNA aptamers are stable probes to engineer biosensors.

  • √ Aptasensors can simultaneously determine various targets for the detection of biomarkers in complex biological samples.

  • √ Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic oriented aptasensors display a versatile method with low limit of detection.

References

  • 1.Ellington AD, Szostak JW. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature. 1990;346:818–22. doi: 10.1038/346818a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ellington AD, Szostak JW. Selection in vitro of single-stranded DNA molecules that fold into specific ligand-binding structures. Nature. 1992;355:850–2. doi: 10.1038/355850a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ebrahimi M, Hamzeiy H, Barar J, Barzegari A, Omidi Y. Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment Selection of Specific Aptamer for Sensing of Methamphetamine. Sensor Letters. 2013;11:566–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tang J, Yu T, Guo L, Xie J, Shao N, He Z. In vitro selection of DNA aptamer against abrin toxin and aptamer-based abrin direct detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2007;22:2456–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ylera F, Lurz R, Erdmann VA, Furste JP. Selection of RNA aptamers to the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid peptide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290:1583–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beier R, Pahlke C, Quenzel P, Henseleit A, Boschke E, Cuniberti G. et al. Selection of a DNA aptamer against norovirus capsid protein VP1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;351:162–9. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cox JC, Ellington AD. Automated selection of anti-protein aptamers. Bioorg Med Chem. 2001;9:2525–31. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(01)00028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang X, Bing T, Mei H, Fang C, Cao Z, Shangguan D. Characterization and application of a DNA aptamer binding to L-tryptophan. Analyst. 2011;136:577–85. doi: 10.1039/c0an00550a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kato T, Takemura T, Yano K, Ikebukuro K, Karube I. In vitro selection of DNA aptamers which bind to cholic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1493:12–8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xiao Z, Shangguan D, Cao Z, Fang X, Tan W. Cell-specific internalization study of an aptamer from whole cell selection. Chemistry. 2008;14:1769–75. doi: 10.1002/chem.200701330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee JO, So HM, Jeon EK, Chang H, Won K, Kim YH. Aptamers as molecular recognition elements for electrical nanobiosensors. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390:1023–32. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1643-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang X, Hu Y, Kong W, Chu X, Yang M, Zhao M. et al. Ultra-fast liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry determination of ochratoxin A in traditional Chinese medicines based on vortex-assisted solid-liquid microextraction and aptamer-affinity column clean-up. J Sep Sci. 2014;37:3052–9. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201400635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han B, Zhao C, Yin J, Wang H. High performance aptamer affinity chromatography for single-step selective extraction and screening of basic protein lysozyme. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012;903:112–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ruta J, Perrier S, Ravelet C, Roy B, Perigaud C, Peyrin E. Aptamer-modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography for the enantioseparation of nucleotides. Anal Chem. 2009;81:1169–76. doi: 10.1021/ac802443j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao Q, Li XF, Le XC. Aptamer-modified monolithic capillary chromatography for protein separation and detection. Anal Chem. 2008;80:3915–20. doi: 10.1021/ac702567x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deng Q, Watson CJ, Kennedy RT. Aptamer affinity chromatography for rapid assay of adenosine in microdialysis samples collected in vivo. J Chromatogr A. 2003;1005:123–30. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(03)00812-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bridonneau P, Bunch S, Tengler R, Hill K, Carter J, Pieken W. et al. Purification of a highly modified RNA-aptamer Effect of complete denaturation during chromatography on product recovery and specific activity. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999;726:237–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu Y, Liu Y, Zhou M, Huang K, Cao J, Wang H. et al. Chemiluminescence detection of protein in capillary electrophoresis using aptamer-functionalized gold nanoparticles as biosensing platform. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1340:128–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bao J, Krylova SM, Reinstein O, Johnson PE, Krylov SN. Label-free solution-based kinetic study of aptamer-small molecule interactions by kinetic capillary electrophoresis with UV detection revealing how kinetics control equilibrium. Anal Chem. 2011;83:8387–90. doi: 10.1021/ac2026699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen R, Guo L, Zhang Z, Meng Q, Xie J. Highly sensitive determination of recombinant human erythropoietin-alpha in aptamer-based affinity probe capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:5635–41. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.06.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang H, Li XF, Le XC. Tunable aptamer capillary electrophoresis and its application to protein analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:34–5. doi: 10.1021/ja0778747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ruta J, Ravelet C, Baussane I, Fize J, Decout JL, Peyrin E. Competitive affinity capillary electrophoresis assay based on a “hybrid” pre-incubation/on-capillary mixing format using an enantioselective aptamer as affinity ligand. J Sep Sci. 2008;31:2239–43. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200700633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li T, Li B, Dong S. Aptamer-based label-free method for hemin recognition and DNA assay by capillary electrophoresis with chemiluminescence detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;389:887–93. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1487-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berezovski M, Nutiu R, Li Y, Krylov SN. Affinity analysis of a protein-aptamer complex using nonequilibrium capillary electrophoresis of equilibrium mixtures. Anal Chem. 2003;75:1382–6. doi: 10.1021/ac026214b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Majumder P, Gomes KN, Ulrich H. Aptamers: from bench side research towards patented molecules with therapeutic applications. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2009;19:1603–13. doi: 10.1517/13543770903313746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Missailidis S, Hardy A. Aptamers as inhibitors of target proteins. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2009;19:1073–82. doi: 10.1517/13543770903042337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Charoenphol P, Bermudez H. Aptamer-targeted DNA nanostructures for therapeutic delivery. Mol Pharm. 2014;11:1721–5. doi: 10.1021/mp500047b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhou J, Rossi JJ. Cell-type-specific, Aptamer-functionalized Agents for Targeted Disease Therapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3:e169. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2014.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhu H, Li J, Zhang XB, Ye M, Tan W. Nucleic Acid Aptamer-Mediated Drug Delivery for Targeted Cancer Therapy. ChemMedChem. 2014 doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201402312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Viraka Nellore BP, Pramanik A, Chavva SR, Sinha SS, Robinson C, Fan Z. et al. Aptamer-conjugated theranostic hybrid graphene oxide with highly selective biosensing and combined therapy capability. Faraday Discuss. 2014 doi: 10.1039/c4fd00074a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gilbert JC, DeFeo-Fraulini T, Hutabarat RM, Horvath CJ, Merlino PG, Marsh HN. et al. First-in-human evaluation of anti von Willebrand factor therapeutic aptamer ARC1779 in healthy volunteers. Circulation. 2007;116:2678–86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reyes-Reyes EM, Teng Y, Bates PJ. A new paradigm for aptamer therapeutic AS1411 action: uptake by macropinocytosis and its stimulation by a nucleolin-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8617–29. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ishiguro A, Akiyama T, Adachi H, Inoue J, Nakamura Y. Therapeutic potential of anti-interleukin-17A aptamer: suppression of interleukin-17A signaling and attenuation of autoimmunity in two mouse models. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:455–66. doi: 10.1002/art.30108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Y, Wu H, Niu Y, Hu Y, Li Q, Cao C. et al. Development of RNA aptamer-based therapeutic agents. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20:3655–63. doi: 10.2174/0929867311320290011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mairal T, Ozalp VC, Lozano Sanchez P, Mir M, Katakis I, O’Sullivan CK. Aptamers: molecular tools for analytical applications. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390:989–1007. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1346-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thevenot DR, Toth K, Durst RA, Wilson GS. Electrochemical biosensors: recommended definitions and classification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2001;16:121–31. doi: 10.1016/s0956-5663(01)00115-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.O’Sullivan CK. Aptasensors--the future of biosensing? Anal Bioanal Chem. 2002;372:44–8. doi: 10.1007/s00216-001-1189-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lim YC, Kouzani AZ, Duan W. Aptasensors: a review. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2010;6:93–105. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2010.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jalit Y, Gutierrez FA, Dubacheva G, Goyer C, Coche-Guerente L, Defrancq E. et al. Characterization of a modified gold platform for the development of a label-free anti-thrombin aptasensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;41:424–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.08.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vasilescu A, Gaspar S, Mihai I, Tache A, Litescu SC. Development of a label-free aptasensor for monitoring the self-association of lysozyme. Analyst. 2013;138:3530–7. doi: 10.1039/c3an00229b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hamaguchi N, Ellington A, Stanton M. Aptamer beacons for the direct detection of proteins. Anal Biochem. 2001;294:126–31. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li JJ, Fang X, Tan W. Molecular aptamer beacons for real-time protein recognition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;292:31–40. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Levy M, Cater SF, Ellington AD. Quantum-dot aptamer beacons for the detection of proteins. Chembiochem. 2005;6:2163–6. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200500218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rajendran M, Ellington AD. Selection of fluorescent aptamer beacons that light up in the presence of zinc. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390:1067–75. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1735-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tuleuova N, Revzin A. Micropatterning of Aptamer Beacons to Create Cytokine-Sensing Surfaces. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2010;3:337–44. doi: 10.1007/s12195-010-0148-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bruno JG, Zuniga MA, Carrillo MP, Phillips T. Development of naturally selected and molecularly engineered intrachain and competitive FRET-aptamers and aptamer beacons. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2011;14:622–30. doi: 10.2174/138620711796367175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liang Y, Zhang Z, Wei H, Hu Q, Deng J, Guo D. et al. Aptamer beacons for visualization of endogenous protein HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in living cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;28:270–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jun BH, Kim JE, Rho C, Byun JW, Kim YH, Kang H. et al. Immobilization of aptamer-based molecular beacons onto optically-encoded micro-sized beads. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11:6249–52. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2011.4501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bruno JG, Carrillo MP. Development of aptamer beacons for rapid presumptive detection of Bacillus spores. J Fluoresc. 2012;22:915–24. doi: 10.1007/s10895-011-1030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Trevino SG, Levy M. High-throughput bead-based identification of structure-switching aptamer beacons. Chembiochem. 2014;15:1877–81. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bai H, Wang R, Hargis B, Lu H, Li Y. A SPR aptasensor for detection of avian influenza virus H5N1. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12:12506–18. doi: 10.3390/s120912506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Feng K, Kong R, Wang H, Zhang S, Qu F. A universal amplified strategy for aptasensors: enhancing sensitivity through allostery-triggered enzymatic recycling amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;38:121–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chuang TL, Chang CC, Chu-Su Y, Wei SC, Zhao XH, Hsueh PR. et al. Disposable surface plasmon resonance aptasensor with membrane-based sample handling design for quantitative interferon-gamma detection. Lab Chip. 2014;14:2968–77. doi: 10.1039/c4lc00249k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Oguro A, Ohtsu T, Nakamura Y. An aptamer-based biosensor for mammalian initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4A. Anal Biochem. 2009;388:102–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hianik T, Wang J. Electrochemical aptasensors–recent achievements and perspectives. Electroanalysis. 2009;21:1223–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sassolas A, Blum LJ, Leca‐Bouvier BD. Electrochemical aptasensors. Electroanalysis. 2009;21:1237–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mosharov EV, Sulzer D. Analysis of exocytotic events recorded by amperometry. Nat Methods. 2005;2:651–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Westerink RH. Exocytosis: using amperometry to study presynaptic mechanisms of neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology. 2004;25:461–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Porterfield DM. Measuring metabolism and biophysical flux in the tissue, cellular and sub-cellular domains: recent developments in self-referencing amperometry for physiological sensing. Biosens Bioelectron. 2007;22:1186–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Felix FS, Angnes L. Fast and accurate analysis of drugs using amperometry associated with flow injection analysis. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99:4784–804. doi: 10.1002/jps.22192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bakker E, Pretsch E. Modern potentiometry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46:5660–8. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bakker E, Pretsch E. Nanoscale potentiometry. Trends Analyt Chem. 2008;27:612–8. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2008.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zong XL, Wu CS, Wu XL, Lu YF, Wang P. A non-labeled DNA biosensor based on light addressable potentiometric sensor modified with TiO2 thin film. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10:860–6. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0920090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Goda T, Miyahara Y. Label-free and reagent-less protein biosensing using aptamer-modified extended-gate field-effect transistors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;45:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.01.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McCauley TG, Hamaguchi N, Stanton M. Aptamer-based biosensor arrays for detection and quantification of biological macromolecules. Anal Biochem. 2003;319:244–50. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(03)00297-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cho EJ, Collett JR, Szafranska AE, Ellington AD. Optimization of aptamer microarray technology for multiple protein targets. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;564:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kirby R, Cho EJ, Gehrke B, Bayer T, Park YS, Neikirk DP. et al. Aptamer-based sensor arrays for the detection and quantitation of proteins. Anal Chem. 2004;76:4066–75. doi: 10.1021/ac049858n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mashinchian O, Johari-Ahar M, Ghaemi B, Rashidi M, Barar J, Omidi Y. Impacts of quantum dots in molecular detection and bioimaging of cancer. Bioimpacts. 2014;4:149–66. doi: 10.15171/bi.2014.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhang Y, Zeng Q, Sun Y, Liu X, Tu L, Kong X. et al. Multi-targeting single fiber-optic biosensor based on evanescent wave and quantum dots. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;26:149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang H, Jiang B, Xiang Y, Zhang Y, Chai Y, Yuan R. Aptamer/quantum dot-based simultaneous electrochemical detection of multiple small molecules. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;688:99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tian J, Zhou L, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Peng Y, Zhao S. Multiplexed detection of tumor markers with multicolor quantum dots based on fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Talanta. 2012;92:72–7. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Anfossi L, Calza P, Sordello F, Giovannoli C, Di Nardo F, Passini C. et al. Multi-analyte homogenous immunoassay based on quenching of quantum dots by functionalized graphene. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:4841–9. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-7885-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Liu J, Lee JH, Lu Y. Quantum dot encoding of aptamer-linked nanostructures for one-pot simultaneous detection of multiple analytes. Anal Chem. 2007;79:4120–5. doi: 10.1021/ac070055k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li Y, Lee HJ, Corn RM. Detection of protein biomarkers using RNA aptamer microarrays and enzymatically amplified surface plasmon resonance imaging. Anal Chem. 2007;79:1082–8. doi: 10.1021/ac061849m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Elbaz J, Shlyahovsky B, Li D, Willner I. Parallel analysis of two analytes in solutions or on surfaces by using a bifunctional aptamer: applications for biosensing and logic gate operations. Chembiochem. 2008;9:232–9. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Du Y, Li B, Wei H, Wang Y, Wang E. Multifunctional label-free electrochemical biosensor based on an integrated aptamer. Anal Chem. 2008;80:5110–7. doi: 10.1021/ac800303c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hansen JA, Wang J, Kawde AN, Xiang Y, Gothelf KV, Collins G. Quantum-dot/aptamer-based ultrasensitive multi-analyte electrochemical biosensor. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2228–9. doi: 10.1021/ja060005h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Li X, Xia J, Li W, Zhang S. Multianalyte electrochemical biosensor based on aptamer- and nanoparticle-integrated bio-barcode amplification. Chem Asian J. 2010;5:294–300. doi: 10.1002/asia.200900217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chhabra R, Sharma J, Ke Y, Liu Y, Rinker S, Lindsay S. et al. Spatially addressable multiprotein nanoarrays templated by aptamer-tagged DNA nanoarchitectures. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:10304–5. doi: 10.1021/ja072410u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hesselberth JR, Robertson MP, Knudsen SM, Ellington AD. Simultaneous detection of diverse analytes with an aptazyme ligase array. Anal Biochem. 2003;312:106–12. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(02)00441-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Xie S, Walton SP. Development of a dual-aptamer-based multiplex protein biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25:2663–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hianik T, Ostatna V, Sonlajtnerova M, Grman I. Influence of ionic strength, pH and aptamer configuration for binding affinity to thrombin. Bioelectrochemistry. 2007;70:127–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2006.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Steel AB, Levicky RL, Herne TM, Tarlov MJ. Immobilization of nucleic acids at solid surfaces: effect of oligonucleotide length on layer assembly. Biophys J. 2000;79:975–81. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76351-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Liao W, Randall BA, Alba NA, Cui XT. Conducting polymer-based impedimetric aptamer biosensor for in situ detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;392:861–4. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2354-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Barar J, Omidi Y. Translational Approaches towards Cancer Gene Therapy: Hurdles and Hopes. Bioimpacts. 2012;2:127–43. doi: 10.5681/bi.2012.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Liu J, Mazumdar D, Lu Y. A simple and sensitive “dipstick” test in serum based on lateral flow separation of aptamer-linked nanostructures. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006;45:7955–9. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mazumdar D, Liu J, Lu G, Zhou J, Lu Y. Easy-to-use dipstick tests for detection of lead in paints using non-cross-linked gold nanoparticle-DNAzyme conjugates. Chem Commun (Camb) 2010;46:1416–8. doi: 10.1039/b917772h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioImpacts : BI are provided here courtesy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES