Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1994 Jan 18;91(2):699–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.2.699

Crucial role for DNA supercoiling in Mu transposition: a kinetic study.

Z Wang 1, R M Harshey 1
PMCID: PMC43016  PMID: 8290584

Abstract

DNA supercoiling plays an indispensable role in an early step of bacteriophage Mu transposition. This step involves formation of a nucleoprotein complex in which the Mu ends synapse and undergo two concerted single-strand cleavages. We describe a kinetic analysis of the role of supercoiling in the Mu-end synapsis reaction as measured by the cleavage assay. We observe a dependence of the reaction rate on superhelical density as well as on the length of Mu donor plasmid DNA. The reaction has a high activation enthalpy (approximately 67 kcal/mol). These results imply that the free energy of supercoiling is used directly to lower the activation barrier of the rate-limiting step of the reaction. Only the free energy of supercoiling associated with DNA outside the Mu ends appears to be utilized, implying that the Mu ends come together before the supercoiling energy is used. Our results suggest an essential function for the bacterial sequences attached to the ends of Mu virion DNA.

Full text

PDF
699

Images in this article

701Fig. 2
on p.701
701Fig. 3
on p.701
702Fig. 4
on p.702

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauer W. R. Structure and reactions of closed duplex DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benham C. J. Theoretical analysis of conformational equilibria in superhelical DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1985;14:23–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Courey A. J., Wang J. C. Cruciform formation in a negatively supercoiled DNA may be kinetically forbidden under physiological conditions. Cell. 1983 Jul;33(3):817–829. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craigie R., Arndt-Jovin D. J., Mizuuchi K. A defined system for the DNA strand-transfer reaction at the initiation of bacteriophage Mu transposition: protein and DNA substrate requirements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(22):7570–7574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.22.7570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):793–800. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90554-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):493–501. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90645-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craigie R., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):387–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson N. Effect of DNA length on the free energy of binding of an unwinding ligand to a supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1972 May 14;66(2):307–309. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90482-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Depew D. E., Wang J. C. Conformational fluctuations of DNA helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4275–4279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hagerman P. J. Flexibility of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:265–286. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hagerman P. J. Investigation of the flexibility of DNA using transient electric birefringence. Biopolymers. 1981 Jul;20(7):1503–1535. doi: 10.1002/bip.1981.360200710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harshey R. M., Bukhari A. I. Infecting bacteriophage mu DNA forms a circular DNA-protein complex. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jun 25;167(2):427–441. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80343-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuo C. F., Zou A. H., Jayaram M., Getzoff E., Harshey R. DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1585–1591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07679.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lavoie B. D., Chan B. S., Allison R. G., Chaconas G. Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3051–3059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leung P. C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature. 1989 Apr 20;338(6217):656–658. doi: 10.1038/338656a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mizuuchi K. Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1011–1051. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mizuuchi M., Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):303–311. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90104-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nakayama C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Structural domains in phage Mu transposase: identification of the site-specific DNA-binding domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1809–1813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peck L. J., Nordheim A., Rich A., Wang J. C. Flipping of cloned d(pCpG)n.d(pCpG)n DNA sequences from right- to left-handed helical structure by salt, Co(III), or negative supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4560–4564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pulleyblank D. E., Shure M., Tang D., Vinograd J., Vosberg H. P. Action of nicking-closing enzyme on supercoiled and nonsupercoiled closed circular DNA: formation of a Boltzmann distribution of topological isomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4280–4284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shimizu M., Hanvey J. C., Wells R. D. Intramolecular DNA triplexes in supercoiled plasmids. I. Effect of loop size on formation and stability. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 5;264(10):5944–5949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shure M., Vinograd J. The number of superhelical turns in native virion SV40 DNA and minicol DNA determined by the band counting method. Cell. 1976 Jun;8(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Surette M. G., Buch S. J., Chaconas G. Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Surette M. G., Chaconas G. A protein factor which reduces the negative supercoiling requirement in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is Escherichia coli integration host factor. J Biol Chem. 1989 Feb 15;264(5):3028–3034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Surette M. G., Chaconas G. The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage. Cell. 1992 Mar 20;68(6):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90081-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vologodskii A. V., Levene S. D., Klenin K. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M., Cozzarelli N. R. Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1992 Oct 20;227(4):1224–1243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90533-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang J. C. DNA supercoiling and its effects on the structure of DNA. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1984;1:21–29. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1984.supplement_1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang J. C., Giaever G. N. Action at a distance along a DNA. Science. 1988 Apr 15;240(4850):300–304. doi: 10.1126/science.3281259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wasserman S. A., Cozzarelli N. R. Biochemical topology: applications to DNA recombination and replication. Science. 1986 May 23;232(4753):951–960. doi: 10.1126/science.3010458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zechiedrich E. L., Osheroff N. Eukaryotic topoisomerases recognize nucleic acid topology by preferentially interacting with DNA crossovers. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4555–4562. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07908.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zou A. H., Leung P. C., Harshey R. M. Transposase contacts with mu DNA ends. J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 25;266(30):20476–20482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES