Table 4.
Sample # visit # | Drug resistance mutation | Gene product | Frequency of DR mutation (coverage)* | Mutational load (copies/ml) | Treatment at time point of failure | Stanford resistance profile for major mutations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2v15 | M41L | RT | 13.3%(5316) | 6913 | ZDV, 3TC | H: 3TC, FTC |
M184V | RT | 99.9%(7721) | 51926 | L: ABC, DDI | ||
5v20 | K103N | RT | 100%(5807) | 513564 | ZDV, 3TC, | H: 3TC, FTC, |
M184V | RT | 82.8%(5266) | 425231 | ABC, EFV | EFV, NVP | |
L: ABC | ||||||
PL: DDI | ||||||
6v20 | L90M | PI | 16.2%(3602) | 179820 | TDF, FTC, DRVr, RAL | H: NFV |
I: IDV, SQV | ||||||
L: ATV, LPV, FPV, | ||||||
9v33 | M184V | RT | 99.8%(7493) | 420158 | ZDV, 3TC, ABC, RTV, FTC | H: 3TC, FTC |
L: ABC | ||||||
PL: DDI | ||||||
10v10 | K103N | RT | 100%(5979) | 40200 | EFV, TDF, FTC | H: 3TC, FTC, EFV, NVP |
M184V | RT | 100%(5399) | 40200 | L: ABC | ||
PL: DDI | ||||||
16v11 | E138K | RT | 7.6%(8955) | 27149 | 3TC, RTV, LPV | H: 3TC, FTC |
M184V | RT | 56.6%(8222) | 202190 | I: RPV | ||
S147G | IN | 7.0%(3123) | 25006 | L: ABC | ||
PL: DDI, EFV, ETR, NVP | ||||||
23v17 | K103N | RT | 99.8%(6110) | 16168 | EFV, TDF, FTC | H: 3TC, FTC, EFV, NVP |
M184V | RT | 67.1%(6182) | 10870 | |||
L: ABC | ||||||
PL: DDI | ||||||
27v05 | M46I** | PI | 7.3%(3591) | 1262 | d4T, 3TC, ABC, IDVr | L: NFV |
PL: ATV, FPV, IDVr, LPV (non-emerging DR related to treatment: H: 3TC, L: ABC) |
Boldface: correlation between mutation, treatment and drug resistance profile in each patient sample at the time point of treatment failure. H = high level drug resistance, I = intermediate drug resistance, L = low level drug resistance, PL: potential low level drug resistance. Drug resistance mutations in italics are not associated with any reported drug taken by the patients throughout the course of this study. *Coverage refers to the number of sequencing reads representing a given nucleotide. **Patient 27 virus also harbored I54V, L90M, K103N and M184V at both time points. These mutations did not emerge between treatment success and failure, but likely contributed to overall failure.