Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb 13;33(7):995–1000. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2474-1

Factors associated with regional rheumatic pain disorders in a population of Puerto Ricans with diabetes mellitus

Yvonne M Font 1, Lesliane E Castro-Santana 2, Mariely Nieves-Plaza 3,4, Mirna Maldonado 5, Ángel M Mayor 6,7, Luis M Vilá 8,
PMCID: PMC4302737  NIHMSID: NIHMS656196  PMID: 24522480

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with bursitis/tendonitis disorders in Puerto Ricans with diabetes mellitus (DM). A cross-sectional study was performed in 202 adult Puerto Ricans (100 DM patients and 102 non-diabetic subjects). For each participant, a complete medical history and a musculoskeletal exam were systematically performed. Socio-demographic parameters, health-related behaviors, comorbidities, and pharmacotherapy were determined for all subjects. For DM patients, disease duration, glycemic control, and DM long-term complications were also examined. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the factors associated with bursitis/tendonitis disorders. The mean (SD) age for DM patients and non-diabetic controls were 53.3 (12.9) and 50.0 (13.1) years; 64.0 and 64.7 % of DM patients and controls were females, respectively. Overall, the prevalence of bursitis/tendonitis was higher in DM patients than among non-diabetics (59.0 % vs. 29.4 %, p<0.01). In multivariate analyses, DM patients had 2.47 (95 % CI 1.05, 5.84) the odds of having bursitis/tendonitis as compared to non-diabetics. Specifically, DM patients had a higher frequency of flexor tenosynovitis, De Quervain’s tenosynovitis, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, trochanteric bursitis, and anserine bursitis than non-diabetic subjects (p<0.05). Among DM patients, multivariate analyses showed that those with bursitis/tendonitis were more likely to be female [OR (95 % CI) 4.55 (1.42, 14.55)] and have peripheral vascular disease [OR (95 % CI) 8.48 (1.71, 41.93)]. In conclusion, bursitis/tendonitis disorders were common in this population of Hispanics with DM. Among DM patients, bursitis/tendonitis disorders were more frequent in women and those with long-term complications such as peripheral vascular disease.

Keywords: Bursitis, Diabetes mellitus, Hispanics, Puerto Rico, Regional rheumatic pain disorders, Tendonitis

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease associated with a wide variety of complications including renal disease, peripheral neuropathy, retinopathy, and vascular events. Due to its multi-systemic nature, the development of additional manifestations such as musculoskeletal complications is possible [1, 2]. High glucose levels may affect the connective tissue by the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) [3]. In fact, a high prevalence of rheumatic conditions has been previously reported in patients with DM including adhesive capsulitis, Dupuytren’s contractures, flexor tenosynovitis, and limited joint mobility [1, 2, 4, 5]. Rheumatic disorders in DM have been associated with disease duration, degree of metabolic control, and the presence of end-organ damage [68]. However, data about the association of DM with specific manifestations such as bursitis and tendonitis syndromes are limited. Moreover, most of these studies have focused in a single regional rheumatic pain disorder and have not included control groups [711]. Thus, the aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of regional rheumatic pain disorders in a population of Hispanics with DM patients and non-diabetic subjects and to evaluate their association with socio-demographic parameters, comorbidities, glycemic control, long-term manifestations, and pharmacologic therapy among DM patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed in adult DM patients and non-diabetic subjects from Puerto Rico. DM patients were ≥21 years old and fulfilled the National Diabetes Data Group Classification which defines diabetes as present from any two of the following tests on different days: (1) symptoms of diabetes plus casual plasma glucose concentration≥ 200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L], (2) fasting plasma glucose≥ 126 mg/dL [7.0 mmol/L], or (3) 2-h plasma glucose≥ 200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L] during an oral glucose tolerance test [12]. All study participants were recruited from the outpatient endocrinology clinics at the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus from March 2006 to March 2008. Recruitment of non-diabetic subjects included patients’ friends or neighbors accompanying diabetic patients to their scheduled medical visit. Patients’ relatives were excluded. An informed consent was obtained for all individuals willing to participate. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus.

For each patient, a complete medical and musculoskeletal examination was performed in a standard manner by one of the principal investigators (YMF or LECS). Bursitis/tendonitis disorders were ascertained by physical examination as described in the Appendix. In addition, at study visit, a structured questionnaire was completed for each participant to gather data about socio-demographic features, health-related behaviors, and comorbidities.

Variables

For all study participants socio-demographic parameters, health-related behaviors, and comorbidities were studied. Socio-demographic features included gender, age, level of education, marital status, and annual income. Among health-related behaviors, smoking, alcohol use, exercise, and body mass index (BMI in kilogram per square meter) were evaluated. Comorbidities included rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, gout, osteoarthritis (OA), chronic back pain, fibromyalgia, dyslipidemia (hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia), arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, anxiety, and malignancy.

For DM patients, disease duration, fasting blood glucose, glycemic control, DM long-term complications, and diabetes treatment (use of insulin and/or oral medication) were also examined. Glycemic control was evaluated using an average of the previous three measurements of glycosylated hemoglobin (HgA1c). DM complications including neurologic complications (peripheral neuropathy, gastroparesis, neurogenic bladder, and cerebrovascular accidents), renal disease (microalbuminuria and end-stage renal disease (ESRD)), retinopathy (non-proliferative and proliferative), cataracts, and cardiovascular complications (peripheral vascular disease, myocardial infarction, angina, percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PTCA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and congestive heart failure) were studied. Finally, the use of insulin and oral DM medications was determined.

Statistical analysis

Univariate analysis was done using the mean (standard deviation, SD), median (25th and 75th percentiles) for continuous data, and frequencies and percentages for categorical data. Bivariate analysis was done using the unpaired t test (or Mann-Whitney U test when appropriate) for continuous data and the Pearson chi-square statistics (or Fisher’s exact test) for categorical data.

To evaluate the association of DM status with bursitis/tendonitis as well as with socio-demographic characteristics, health-related behaviors, and clinical covariates, contingency tables were constructed. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were also calculated. An unconditional multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between DM and bursitis/tendonitis after adjustment for covariates with p<0.10 in bivariate analysis. The evaluation of interaction terms between bursitis/tendonitis with covariates associated with diabetes was done, and a significant interaction was observed between bursitis/tendonitis and anxiety (p=0.049); thus, the final model for the association between diabetes and bursitis/tendonitis for the complete study sample was adjusted to account for the interaction.

A sub-analysis was done among DM patients (N=100) to assess the role of study covariates with bursitis/tendonitis using contingency tables, ORs, and 95%CI. Variables with a p value <0.10 in bivariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model, and adjustment was done by age at evaluation and DM duration. Statistical significance for all analyses was set at p<0.05. The statistical software STATA version 11 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to perform the analyses.

Results

A total of 217 subjects were asked to participate in the study; 15 patients declined to participate. The sample consisted of 202 subjects, 100 DM patients and 102 non-diabetic individuals. Table 1 shows the socio-demographic parameters, health-related behaviors, comorbidities, and regional rheumatic pain disorders among diabetic patients and non-diabetic individuals. DM patients had lower level of education and lower income than non-diabetic subjects (p<0.05). In addition, DM patients were more likely (p<0.01) to have hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, dyslipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease and anxiety disorder, and higher BMI than non-diabetics.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic parameters, health-related behaviors, co-morbidities, and regional rheumatic pain disorders among diabetic patients and non-diabetic individuals (N=202)

Feature DM
patients
(n=100)
Non-
diabetics
(n=102)
p value
Socioeconomic-demographic
  Gender, % female 64.0 64.7 0.917
  Age at study visit, mean (SD) years 53.3 (12.9) 50.0 (13.1) 0.069
  Education, mean (SD) years 9.7 (3.9) 12.2 (4.2) <0.001
  Married, % 65.0 61.4 0.595
  Income<US$10,000, % 39.0 25.5 0.040
Health-related behaviors, %
  Smoking 13.0 7.8 0.256
  Alcohol abuse 1.0 3.9 0.369
  Exercise 30.0 28.4 0.806
Body mass index, mean (SD), kg/m2 32.3 (7.3) 28.1 (5.0) <0.001
Comorbid conditions, %
  Rheumatoid arthritis 0.0 0.0
  Systemic lupus erythematosus 2.0 0.0 0.244
  Hypothyroidism 22.0 2.9 <0.001
  Hyperthyroidism 4.0 3.9 0.999
  Gouty arthritis 1.0 0.0 0.999
  Osteoarthritis 49.0 26.5 0.001
  Chronic back pain 41.0 35.3 0.404
  Fibromyalgia 5.0 1.0 0.117
  Dyslipidemia 62.0 18.6 <0.001
  Hypertension 68.0 25.5 <0.001
  Coronary artery disease 29.0 5.9 <0.001
  Obstructive pulmonary disease 4.0 1.0 0.167
  Major depression 25.0 15.7 0.100
  Anxiety disorder 16.0 6.9 0.041
  Malignancy 8.0 5.9 0.554
Bursitis/tendonitis (overall), % 59.0 29.4 <0.001
  Flexor tenosynovitis 17.0 3.9 0.002
  De Quervain’s tenosynovitis 8.0 1.0 0.018
  Lateral epicondylitis 20.0 3.9 <0.001
  Medial epicondylitis 16.0 1.0 <0.001
  Olecranon bursitis 2.0 0.0 0.244
  Rotator cuff tendonitis 10.0 7.8 0.591
  Bicipital tendonitis 9.0 2.9 0.069
  Trochanteric bursitis 25.0 12.8 0.026
  Pre-patellar bursitis 3.0 0.0 0.119
  Anserine bursitis 38.0 16.7 0.001

DM diabetes mellitus, SD standard deviation

Overall, the prevalence of bursitis/tendonitis was significantly higher among DM patients than non-diabetic subjects (59.0 % vs. 29.4 %, p<0.01). Specifically, DM patients were more likely (p<0.05) to have flexor tenosynovitis, De Quervain’s tenosynovitis, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, trochanteric bursitis, and anserine bursitis (Table 1). In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, education level (<12 years), annual income, BMI, hypothyroidism, OA, dyslipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, depression, and anxiety, DM patients had 2.47 (95 % CI 1.05, 5.84) the odds of having bursitis/tendonitis than non-diabetic subjects (data not shown).

Table 2 shows a subanalysis of the association of socio-demographic parameters, health-related behaviors, and co-morbidities with bursitis/tendonitis among the 100 DM patients. DM patients with bursitis/tendonitis were more likely to be female than diabetics without bursitis/tendonitis (p=0.003). In addition, the prevalence of comorbid conditions such as OA, chronic back pain, and major depression was significantly increased among diabetics with bursitis/tendonitis. A marginal tendency of higher prevalence of hypothyroidism (p=0.054) was also observed among diabetics with bursitis/tendonitis.

Table 2.

Socio-demographic parameters, health-related behaviors, and selected comorbidities in diabetic patients with and without bursitis/tendinitis (N=100)

Feature Bursitis/
tendinitis
(n=59)
No bursitis/
tendinitis
(n=41)
p
value
Socio-demographic features
  Gender, % female 76.3 46.3 0.003
  Age at evaluation, mean (SD) years 49.7 (21.1) 41.3 (25.9) 0.862
  Disease duration, mean (SD) years 11.6 (10.0) 10.2 (11.1) 0.510
  Education, mean (SD) years 9.6 (3.8) 9.7 (3.9) 0.861
  Married, % 64.4 65.9 0.999
  Income<$10,000, % 39.0 39.0 0.999
Health-related behaviors, %
  Smoking 11.9 14.6 0.766
  Alcohol abuse 0.0 2.4 0.410
  Exercise 28.8 31.7 0.756
Type 2 diabetes mellitus, % 91.5 78.0 0.056
Body mass index, mean (SD) kg/m2 32.7 (7.3) 31.6 (7.3) 0.471
Comorbid conditions, %
  Rheumatoid arthritis 0.0 0.0
  Systemic lupus erythematosus 3.4 0.0 0.511
  Hypothyroidism 28.8 12.2 0.054
  Hyperthyroidism 1.7 7.3 0.302
  Gouty arthritis 0.0 0.0
  Osteoarthritis 62.7 29.3 0.001
  Chronic back pain 49.2 29.3 0.047
  Fibromyalgia 8.5 0.0 0.076
  Dyslipidemia 62.7 61.0 0.999
  Hypertension 67.8 68.3 0.999
  Obstructive pulmonary disease 5.1 2.4 0.642
  Major depression 33.9 12.2 0.018
  Anxiety disorder 18.6 12.2 0.423
  Malignancy 11.9 2.4 0.136

SD standard deviation

Glycemic control, DM long-term complications, and treatment modalities of DM patients are depicted in Table 3. Patients with bursitis/tendonitis disorders were more likely to have long-term DM complications such as cataracts and peripheral vascular disease (p<0.01). No significant association was found for DM duration, fasting blood glucose, and glycemic control (as measured by mean HgA1c), neurologic involvement, renal involvement, and retinopathy. Both groups were similar in terms of DM pharmacological treatments.

Table 3.

Glycemic control, long-term diabetes complications, and treatment modalities of diabetic patients with and without bursitis/tendonitis (N=100)

Feature (%) Bursitis/
tendinitis
(n=59)
No bursitis/
tendinitis
(n=41)
p
value
DM duration, mean (SD) years 11.6 (10.0) 10.2 (11.1) 0.510
Fasting blood sugar, mean (SD) mg/dl 143.5 (71.7) 171.0 (103.0) 0.357
Glycosylated Hg, mean (SD) % 8.3 (2.0) 8.5 (2.6) 0.959
Neurologic involvement, % 54.2 46.3 0.437
  Peripheral neuropathy 47.5 39.0 0.403
  Gastroparesis 3.4 0.0 0.511
  Neurogenic bladder 10.2 4.9 0.466
  Cerebrovascular accident 6.8 7.3 0.999
Renal involvement, % 42.4 34.2 0.407
  Microalbuminuria 20.3 17.1 0.682
  End-stage renal disease 3.4 2.4 0.999
Retinopathy, % 27.1 17.1 0.240
  Non-proliferative 11.9 9.8 0.999
  Proliferative 16.9 7.3 0.229
Cataracts, % 27.1 4.9 0.007
Cardiovascular complications, % 37.3 26.8 0.274
  Peripheral vascular disease 27.1 4.9 0.004
  Myocardial infarction 11.9 9.8 0.999
  Angina 16.9 19.5 0.743
  PTCA 3.4 0.0 0.511
  CABG 5.1 0.0 0.267
  Congestive heart failure 1.7 2.4 0.999
DM treatments, %
  Insulin alone 23.7 26.8 0.725
  Oral medications alone 33.9 24.4 0.308
  Oral medications + insulin 40.7 48.8 0.422

DM diabetes mellitus, SD standard deviation, Hg hemoglobin, PTCA percutaneous coronary angioplasty, CABG coronary arteries bypass graft

Estimates of the association strength between bursitis/tendonitis and study variables in DM cases are depicted in Table 4. In univariate analyses, increased odds of bursitis/tendonitis were observed among females and in those with OA, major depression, cataracts, and peripheral vascular disease. In multivariate analyses, only female gender [OR (95 % CI) 4.55 (1.42, 14.55)] and peripheral vascular disease [OR (95 % CI) retained significance.

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate models for the presence of bursitis/tendonitis among diabetic patients

Characteristic Univariatea
OR (95 % CI)
Multivariateb
OR (95 % CI)
Female gender 3.72 (1.58– 8.79) 4.55 (1.42– 14.55)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus 3.04 (0.93– 9.86) 2.30 (0.37– 14.05)
Hypothyroidism 2.91 (0.98– 8.69) 2.03 (0.51– 6.49)
Osteoarthritis 4.06 (1.72– 9.56) 2.28 (0.88– 8.11)
Chronic back pain 2.34 (1.00– 5.44) 1.22 (0.42– 3.59)
Major depression 3.69 (1.25– 10.87) 1.86 (0.49– 7.03)
Cataracts 7.26 (2.01– 26.26) 4.08 (0.93– 17.90)
Peripheral vascular disease 7.26 (1.57– 33.59) 8.48 (1.71– 41.93)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

a

Analysis included variables with p<0.10 on the bivariate analysis (Table 3)

b

Adjusted by age, disease duration, and variables with p<0.10 on the bivariate analysis

Discussion

It is known that diabetic patients are at increased risk of serious complications such as vascular, neurologic, and renal complications. Although a high frequency of musculoskeletal disorders has been reported in DM, their impact is usually being disregarded in the clinical setting. The present study was performed in Hispanics from Puerto Rico, an ethnic group with a high prevalence of DM [13]. We found that diabetic patients were more likely to have bursitis and tendonitis disorders than non-diabetic subjects. Specifically, a higher prevalence of flexor tenosynovitis, De Quervain’s tenosynovitis, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, trochanteric bursitis, and anserine bursitis was observed in DM patients. In a multivariate analysis among diabetic patients, tendonitis/bursitis was associated with female gender and peripheral vascular disease. No association was found for glycemic control and other DM complications.

In agreement with other studies, we found that regional rheumatic pain disorders are common in patients with DM [1416]. Higher prevalence of flexor tenosynovitis and anserine bursitis has been reported before for DM patients [15, 16]. In addition, we found De Quervain’s tenosynovitis, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, and trochanteric bursitis to occur more frequently in DM patients than non-diabetic controls.

In the multivariate analysis, we observed that diabetic patients with bursitis/tendonitis were more likely to be female. This association has been previously reported [16, 17]. Cohen et al. found a strong correlation between non-insulin-dependent DM and anserine bursitis especially among women [16]. In agreement with our study, they did not find an association with age, BMI, and glycemic control. Cagliero et al. also showed a correlation between DM and rheumatic disorders, especially among females and those with long-term DM complications [17].

The association of tendonitis/bursitis with peripheral artery disease in our study is interesting because both disorders may share similar pathophysiologic mechanisms. Advanced glycosylation end products accumulate in proteins of DM patients faster than in non-diabetic subjects [18]; this may lead to tendinopathy as well as to vasculopathy. Also, vascular endothelial growth factor, which is associated with DM vascular disease, appears to be involved in the synovial proliferation of the subacromial bursa and shoulder joint contraction in type 2 DM patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy [19]. Finally, Rosenbloom et al. demonstrated an association between limited joint mobility syndrome and microvascular disease, suggesting that alterations in periarticular connective tissue are related to changes occurring in the microvasculature [20].

Contrary to other works, we did not find an association of bursitis/tendonitis with obesity, glycemic control, and long-term DM complications such as neurologic involvement, nephropathy, and retinopathy. Even though our diabetic patients had a significantly higher BMI as compared to non-diabetic subjects, an association between regional rheumatic pain syndromes and BMI was not observed in the subanalysis among DM patients. At present, the role of obesity in rheumatic disorders is still controversial. Earlier works have found a significant higher prevalence of greater trochanteric syndrome among obese subjects although the association was not sustained in multivariate analysis [21]. Among other negative results, our study failed to find and association between bursitis/tendonitis and glycemic control. Nonetheless, glycemic control is an important factor to be considered to reduce not only the burden of micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes [22], but perhaps the occurrence of rheumatic complications as other studies have linked musculoskeletal disorders with long-term glycemic control [23].

This study has some limitations. First, because this work was a cross-sectional study, we could not ascertain if study subjects had prior episodes of bursitis and/or tendinitis. Second, this study was performed in Puerto Ricans evaluated in a university-based center in San Juan, Puerto Rico; thus, the results are not intended to be generalized to the entire population of Puerto Rico or to other ethnic groups. Third, DM status of non-diabetic subjects was self-reported; therefore, the possibility of misclassification bias must be acknowledged; however, the effect of the misclassification would be to underestimate the association of DM and rheumatic pain syndromes, not to overestimate it. Finally, the diagnosis of regional rheumatic pain disorders was based solely on clinical examination and not on imaging studies such as ultrasonography or magnetic resonance. For instance, patients with low back pain and fibromyalgia syndrome may have regional pain and tenderness without having underlying tendinitis/bursitis.

Despite these limitations, the present study has some clinical implications. We found that Puerto Ricans with DM are commonly affected by bursitis and tendonitis disorders, particularly women and those with long-term complications such as peripheral artery disease. Physicians are mainly concerned about cardiovascular, renal, and ocular complications in DM patients because of their impact on the morbidity and mortality. However, our study shows that regional rheumatic pain disorders, which may pose a considerable impairment to their quality of life, are highly prevalent in this population, and therefore, they should not be overlooked by primary care physicians.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) U54 RR 026139-01A1, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) 8U54MD007587, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences TL1TR000145 from the National Institutes of Health, and by unrestricted educational grant from Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

Appendix

Table 5.

Regional rheumatic pain disorders examined

Rheumatic pain disorder Definition
Dupuytren’s contracture Presence of palpable thickening of palmar fascia and flexor deformity of the second, third, fourth, and fifth fingers
Flexor tenosynovitis Palpable nodule or thickening flexor tendon, and/or locking during extension and flexion of any finger
De Quervain’s tenosynovitis Pain and tenderness over radial styloid with a positive Finkelstein maneuver
Olecranon bursitis Pain, tenderness, and swelling at the location of the olecranon bursa
Lateral epicondilytis Pain and tenderness over the medial epicondyle with pain against resistance on wrist extension
Medial epicondilytis Pain and tenderness over the medial epicondyle with pain against resistance on wrist flexion
Rotator’s cuff tendinitis Shoulder pain on active abduction (specially 60° and 120°), tenderness over the greater tuberosity, and positive impingement sign
Bicipital tendinitis Anterior shoulder pain worsened with active flexion, tenderness over the bicipital groove, and positive Yergason’s maneuver and/or Speed’s test
Trochanteric bursitis Pain and tenderness at the location of the trochanteric bursa
Pre-patellar bursitis Pain, tenderness, and swelling at the location of the pre-patellar bursa
Anserine bursitis Pain, tenderness, and swelling at the location of the anserine bursa

Footnotes

Disclosures None.

Contributor Information

Yvonne M. Font, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936-5067, USA

Lesliane E. Castro-Santana, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936-5067, USA

Mariely Nieves-Plaza, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Puerto Rico Clinical & Translational Research Consortium (PRCTRC), University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, USA.

Mirna Maldonado, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, USA.

Ángel M. Mayor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936-5067, USA Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus and the Puerto Rico Clinical & Translational Research Consortium (PRCTRC), San Juan, PR, USA.

Luis M. Vilá, Email: luis.vila2@upr.edu, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936-5067, USA.

References

  • 1.Crispín JC, Alcocer-Varela J. Rheumatologic manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2003;114:753–757. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00140-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenbloom AL. Limited joint mobility in childhood diabetes: discovery, description, and decline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:466–473. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenbloom AL, Silverstein JH. Connective tissue and joint disease in diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996;25:473–483. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70335-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arkkila PE, Kantola IM, Viikari JS, Rönnemaa T. Shoulder capsulitis in type I and II diabetic patients: association with diabetic complications and related diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55:907–914. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.12.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gamstedt A, Holm-Glad J, Ohlson CG, Sundström M. Hand abnormalities are strongly associated with the duration of diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med. 1993;234:189–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burner TW, Rosenthal AK. Diabetes and rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21:50–54. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32831bc0c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balci N, Balci MK, Tüzüner S. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis and shoulder range of motion in type II diabetes mellitus: association with diabetic complications. J Diabetes Complications. 1999;13:135–140. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(99)00037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kameyama M, Funae O, Meguro S, Atsumi Y. HbA1c values determine the outcome of intrasheath injection of triamcinolone for diabetic flexor tenosynovitis. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2512–2514. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arkkila PE, Kantola IM, Viikari JS. Dupuytren’s disease, association with chronic diabetes complications. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:153–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yosipovitch G, Yosipovitch Z, Karp M, Mukamel M. Trigger finger in young adults with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Rheumatol. 1990;17:951–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Umpierrez GE, Stiles RG, Kleinbart J, Krendel DA, Watts NB. Diabetic muscle infarction. Am J Med. 1996;101:245–250. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00156-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:S5–S20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Al-Homood IA. Rheumatic conditions in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:527–533. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2144-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leden I, Scherstén B, Svensson B, Svensson M. Locomotor system disorders in diabetes mellitus. Increased prevalence of flexortenosynovitis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1983;12:260–262. doi: 10.3109/03009748309098546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cohen SE, Mahul O, Meir R, Rubinow A. Anserine bursitis and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:2162–2165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cagliero E, Apruzzese W, Perlmutter GS, Nathan DM. Musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and shoulder in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2002;112:487–490. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abate M, Schiavone C, Salini V, Andia I. Management of limited joint mobility. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:197–207. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S33943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Handa A, Gotoh M, Hamada K, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor 121 and 165 in subacromial bursa are involved in shoulder joint contracture in type II diabetes with rotator cuff disease. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:1138–1144. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rosenbloom AL, Silverstein JH, Lezotte DC, Richardson K, McCallum M. Limited joint mobility in childhood diabetes mellitus indicates increased risk for microvascular disease. New Engl J Med. 1981;305:191–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198107233050403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Segal NA, Felson DT, Torner JC, et al. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: epidemiology and associated features. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:988–992. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ravindran Rajendran S, Bhansali A, Walia R, Dutta P, Bansal V, Shanmugasundar G. Prevalence and pattern of hand soft-tissue changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2011;37:312–317. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vance MC, Tucker JJ, Harness NG. The association of hemoglobin A1c with the prevalence of stenosing flexor tenosynovitis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:1765–1769. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES