Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1976 Jun;73(6):2151–2155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.2151

Fusion of bacterial protoplasts.

P Schaeffer, B Cami, R D Hotchkiss
PMCID: PMC430468  PMID: 819934

Abstract

Prototrophic Bacillus subtilis cells can be formed in the presence of DNase as a result of cell fusion occurring in mixed populations of protoplasts derived from two parental strains which are both nutritionally-complementing and polyauxotrophic. No prototrophs ever appear from mixed nonprotoplasted bacteria, or from the auxotrophic parental protoplasts plated separately. The frequency of prototroph formation, which is appreciable only when the mixed protoplasts are exposed to polyethylene glycol treatment, may exceed 1 X 10(-4) of the total protoplast population initially present, which is 1 to 4 X 10(-3) of those protoplasts which reverted to the bacillary form. It is strongly dependent on the number and chromosomal location of the markers used in the selection of the prototrophs, and it is unaffected when either one of the parental strains bears the phage phi105 in the inducible prophage state. No auxotrophic bacteria, parental or otherwise, were found as segregants from repeatedly isolated protrotrophic clones growing in a nonselective medium. Unselected markers segregate among the selected recombinants. It is concluded that the observed formation of prototropic bacteria is due to protoplast fusion, a process which does not induce prophage development, and that the only stable products of the resulting diploid state are haploid recombinants.

Full text

PDF
2151

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahkong Q. F., Fisher D., Tampion W., Lucy J. A. Mechanisms of cell fusion. Nature. 1975 Jan 17;253(5488):194–195. doi: 10.1038/253194a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahkong Q. F., Howell J. I., Lucy J. A., Safwat F., Davey M. R., Cocking E. C. Fusion of hen erythrocytes with yeast protoplasts induced by polyethylene glycol. Nature. 1975 May 1;255(5503):66–67. doi: 10.1038/255066a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anagnostopoulos C., Spizizen J. REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFORMATION IN BACILLUS SUBTILIS. J Bacteriol. 1961 May;81(5):741–746. doi: 10.1128/jb.81.5.741-746.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BARSKI G., SORIEUL S., CORNEFERT F. [Production of cells of a "hybrid" nature in culturs in vitro of 2 cellular strains in combination]. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1960 Oct 24;251:1825–1827. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlson P. S., Smith H. H., Dearing R. D. Parasexual interspecific plant hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Aug;69(8):2292–2294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.8.2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ephrussi B., Weiss M. C. Hybrid somatic cells. Sci Am. 1969 Apr;220(4):26–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fodor K., Alföldi L. Fusion of protoplasts of Bacillus megaterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):2147–2150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEDERBERG J., ST CLAIR J. Protoplasts and L-type growth of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1958 Feb;75(2):143–160. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.2.143-160.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Landman O. E., Forman A. Gelatin-induced reversion of protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis to the bacillary form: biosynthesis of macromolecules and wall during successive steps. J Bacteriol. 1969 Aug;99(2):576–589. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.2.576-589.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Power J. B., Cummins S. E., Cocking E. C. Fusion of isolated plant protoplasts. Nature. 1970 Mar 14;225(5237):1016–1018. doi: 10.1038/2251016a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ruddle F. H., Kucherlapati R. S. Hybrid cells and human genes. Sci Am. 1974 Jul;231(1):36–44. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0774-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rutberg L., Hoch J. A., Spizizen J. Mechanism of transfection with deoxyribonucleic acid from the temperate Bacillus bacteriophage phi-105. J Virol. 1969 Jul;4(1):50–57. doi: 10.1128/jvi.4.1.50-57.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schaeffer P., Millet J., Aubert J. P. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Sep;54(3):704–711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.3.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sonenshein A. L., Cami B., Brevet J., Cote R. Isolation and characterization of rifampin-resistant and streptolydigin-resistant mutants of Bacillus subtilis with altered sporulation properties. J Bacteriol. 1974 Oct;120(1):253–265. doi: 10.1128/jb.120.1.253-265.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vasil I. K., Giles K. L. Induced transfer of higher plant chloroplasts into fungal protoplasts. Science. 1975 Nov 14;190(4215):680–680. doi: 10.1126/science.127380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wyrick P. B., Rogers H. J. Isolation and characterization of cell wall-defective variants of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis. J Bacteriol. 1973 Oct;116(1):456–465. doi: 10.1128/jb.116.1.456-465.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. YOSHIKAWA H., SUEOKA N. Sequential replication of Bacillus subtilis chromosome. I. Comparison of marker frequencies in exponential and stationary growth phases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Apr;49:559–566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.49.4.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES