Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2014 Nov 19;18(6):508. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0508-y

Dynamic gene expressions of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preliminary study

Xiaodan Wu 1,#, Xiaoru Sun 2,#, Chengshui Chen 2,, Chunxue Bai 3, Xiangdong Wang 2,3,
PMCID: PMC4305227  PMID: 25407108

Abstract

Introduction

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a serious event that is responsible for the progress of the disease, increases in medical costs and high mortality.

Methods

The aim of the present study was to identify AECOPD-specific biomarkers by evaluating the dynamic gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AECOPD on days 1, 3 and 10 after hospital admission and to compare the derived data with data from healthy controls or patients with stable COPD.

Results

We found that 14 genes were co–differentially upregulated and 2 downregulated greater than 10-fold in patients with COPD or AECOPD compared with the healthy individuals. Eight co–differentially upregulated genes and six downregulated genes were identified as a panel of AECOPD-specific genes. Downregulation of TCF7 in PBMCs was found to be associated with the severity of COPD. Dynamic changes of Aminolevulinate-delta-synthase 2 and carbonic anhydrase I had similar patterns of Digital Evaluation Score System scores and may serve as potential genes of interest during the course of AECOPD.

Conclusion

Thus, our findings indicate a panel of altered gene expression patterns in PBMCs that can be used as AECOPD-specific dynamic biomarkers to monitor the course of AECOPD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0508-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammation-based syndrome characterized by progressive deterioration of pulmonary function and increasing airway obstruction [1]. COPD is a major and growing public health burden, ranking as the fourth leading cause of death in the world [2]. In China, it is the fourth leading cause of mortality in urban areas and the third leading cause in rural areas [3]. Patients with COPD often experience a sudden deterioration, termed acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), along with a progressive decline in lung function; AECOPD becomes more frequent and severe when the severity of disease increases [4,5]. There is a great need for early and sensitive diagnosis and novel therapeutic targets for the disease, especially for patients with AECOPD in whom COPD is diagnosed in the late phase of disease, when they have significant or irreversible impairment [6].

The progress of COPD is accelerated by the occurrence of the exacerbation induced by multiple factors, including infection. AECOPD is a serious event that is related to decreased health status, increased medical and social costs and increased mortality [7]. Inflammatory cells (for example, lymphocytes, monocytes or macrophages, and their products) could interact with each other or with structural cells in the airways and the lung parenchymal and pulmonary vasculature, leading to the worsening of COPD [8]. Increased numbers of CD8+ lymphocytes were suggested as one of COPD’s characteristics, being present only in smokers who develop the disease [9]. Increased pulmonary inflammatory mediators in patients with COPD could attract inflammatory cells from the circulation, amplify the inflammatory process and induce structural changes [9].

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) act as a critical component in the immune system to fight infection and adapt to intruders and play an important role in the development of AECOPD. Gene expression profiles of PBMCs were found to be disease-specific and associated with severity [10]. PBMC samples were suggested as easy to gather and important to the discovery of biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic management of COPD [11,12], although gene expression changes in lung tissues were noted to be associated with COPD [13-15]. The aim of the present study was to determine AECOPD-specific biomarkers of PBMCs using the concept of clinical bioinformatics and integrating genomics, bioinformatics, clinical informatics and systems biology [16-18]. We translated all clinical measures, including patient complaints, history, therapies, clinical symptoms and signs, physician’s examinations, biochemical analyses, imaging profiles, pathologies and other measurements, into digital format using a digital evaluation scoring system. PBMCs were isolated from healthy volunteers and patients with stable COPD or AECOPD, and we investigated the disease specificity that we inferred from clinical informatics analysis to search for COPD- or AECOPD-specific genes and dynamic biomarkers for AECOPD.

Material and methods

Patient population

The present study was approved by the Ethical Evaluation Committee of Zhongshan Hospital and designed using a case–control approach. From among 220 candidates comprising blood donors (60 healthy controls), inpatients (80 patients with AECOPD) and outpatients (80 patients with stable COPD) in Zhongshan Hospital, patients with AECOPD, patients with stable COPD and healthy controls matched for age and sex were recruited into the study between October 2011 and March 2012. The inclusion criteria for patients with COPD were as follows: (1) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <80% of predicted value adjusted for age, weight and height, and (2) an improvement in FEV1 following bronchodilator inhalation <12% of baseline FEV1. Patients with asthma who had a persistent airflow obstruction were excluded. Stable COPD was defined according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society consensus criteria as no requirement for increased treatment above maintenance therapy, other than bronchodilators, for 30 days [1]. AECOPD was the reason for hospital admission and was characterized as a worsening of the patient’s respiratory symptoms that was beyond normal day-to-day variations and led to a change in medication [4,19]. Healthy controls enrolled were blood donors at Zhongshan Hospital. Subjects with respiratory diseases, or any family history of lung disease, were excluded. PBMCs were harvested once from healthy controls and patients with stable COPD, as well as from patients with AECOPD, on the admission day and 3 and 10 days after the admission. Informed consent was given by the subjects themselves before they underwent lung function tests, high-resolution computed tomography and blood collection. The time points used in the present study were selected on the basis of our previous study for collecting plasma samples from healthy controls and from patients with stable COPD or AECOPD. The details of the study design are explained in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Details of the study design. Healthy volunteers and patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (sCOPD) or acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) at day 1 (D1), day 3 (D3) or day 10 (D10) of hospital admission of hospital were recruited into the present study according to the criteria stated in the text. All clinical information was collected and transferred into the clinical informatics database using the Digital Evaluation Score System. mRNAs of peripheral blood monocytes were harvested, and gene expression profiles were measured by human gene expression array and subjected to bioinformatics analysis. AECOPD-specific biomarkers were selected by integrating gene functional networks and profiles with clinical informatics data.

Digital evaluation score system

The Digital Evaluation Score System (DESS) is a score index used to translate clinical descriptions and information into clinical informatics, as described previously [20]. Using this instrument, we took into account patient symptoms and signs, biochemical analyses and clinical imaging for patients with stable COPD or AECOPD. Briefly, for the assessment of severity, each component was assigned a score of 0, 1, 2 or 4. The score of 4 as the maximum value indicates far above normal range or much severer condition, and 0 as the minimum value indicates within normal physiological range. After compiling patient data, we added the points for each variable. The DESS scores ranged from 0 to 256 points, with a higher score indicating a severer condition. Patients were scored on the day when their blood samples were collected.

Isolation of PBMC RNA

PBMCs were isolated by using BD Vacutainer CPT cell preparation tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 4 ml of whole blood was collected from each subject. Following centrifugation, cells were lysed for RNA isolation. DNase-free total RNA preparation was performed using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. RNA concentrations were determined by using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA quality was assessed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and samples with an RNA integrity number >6.0 were used.

Microarray analysis

The Human 12×135K Gene Expression Array (Roche NimbleGen Systems, Madison, WI, USA), with about 45,000+ human genes and transcripts represented with public domain annotations, was applied for this study. Sample labeling and array hybridization were performed according to the one-color microarray-based gene expression analysis protocol (Roche NimbleGen Systems). Double-stranded cDNA (ds-cDNA) was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA using an Invitrogen SuperScript reverse transcriptase ds-cDNA synthesis kit (Life Technologies) in the presence of 100 pmol oligo(dT) primers. ds-cDNA was cleaned and labeled in accordance with the NimbleGen gene expression analysis protocol. Briefly, ds-cDNA was incubated with 4 μg of RNase A at 37°C for 10 minutes and cleaned using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol, followed by ice-cold absolute ethanol precipitation. The purified cDNA was quantified using the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer. For Cy3 labeling of cDNA, the NimbleGen one-color DNA labeling kit was used according to the manufacturer’s guidelines as detailed in its gene expression analysis protocol. One microgram of ds-cDNA was incubated for 10 minutes at 98°C with 1 optical density of Cy3-9mer primer. Next, 100 pmol of deoxynucleoside triphosphates and 100 U of the Klenow fragment (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) were added, and the mix was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.1 vol of 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and the labeled ds-cDNA was purified by isopropanol/ethanol precipitation. Microarrays were hybridized at 42°C for 16 to 20 hours with 4 μg of Cy3-labeled ds-cDNA in NimbleGen hybridization buffer/hybridization component A in a hybridization chamber. Following hybridization, washing was performed using the NimbleGen wash buffer kit. After being washed in an ozone-free environment, the slides were scanned using an Axon GenePix 4000B microarray scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Data analysis

For clinical data, all values were expressed as mean ± SE. Analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS 18.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). For microarray analysis, slides were scanned at 5 μm/pixel resolution using the Axon GenePix 4000B microarray scanner piloted by GenePix Pro 6.0 software (Molecular Devices). Scanned images (in TIFF file format) were then imported into NimbleScan software (version 2.5) files for grid alignment and expression data analysis. Expression data were normalized through quantile normalization and the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) algorithm included in the NimbleScan software. The probe-level (*_norm_RMA.pair) files and gene-level (*_RMA.calls) files were generated after normalization. All gene-level files were imported into GeneSpring GX software (version 11.5.1; Agilent Technologies) for further analysis. Differentially expressed genes between two samples were identified by fold change filtering. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the GeneSpring GX software. Gene Ontology (GO) database analysis and pathway analysis were performed using the standard enrichment computation method. The GO database covers three domains: biological process, cellular component and molecular function. Fisher’s exact test was used to find more overlaps between the descriptive list and the GO annotation list than would be expected by chance. The P-value denoted the significance of GO term enrichment in the descriptive genes. The gene expression data are publicly available in the Gene Expression Omnibus database [GEO:GSE60399] [21].

Results

Clinical informatics analysis

Clinical phenotypes are described in Table 1, including age, sex, smoking status, lung function test results and emphysema scores of the subjects. Control subjects were nonsmokers, and patients with stable COPD or AECOPD were ex-smokers. Because of the severity of disease, lung function tests were not performed at the onset of AECOPD; however, the baseline FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC%) and FEV1/predicted percentage of patients with AECOPD were similar to those of patients with stable COPD. In addition, there was no significant difference in the extent of emphysema between patients with stable COPD and those with AECOPD (P = 0.47). DESS scores of subjects from each group are shown in Additional file 1. DESS values of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD were significantly higher than those of control subjects (P < 0.01), as shown in Table 2. DESS scores represented the severity of COPD and declined as the patient’s condition improved. DESS values of patients with AECOPD on day 1 of hospital admission (AE-1) were significantly higher than those on day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) (Table 2).

Table 1.

Clinical phenotypes of healthy controls, patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease a

Groups Subject no. Age (yr) Smoking status FEV 1 /FVC% FEV 1 /pred% Goddard emphysema score
Control 1 56 Nonsmoker 75 85 0
2 53 Nonsmoker 80 87 0
3 62 Nonsmoker 77 91 0
4 68 Nonsmoker 81 83 0
5 58 Nonsmoker 79 81 0
6 67 Nonsmoker 76 90 0
Mean ± SE 60.7 ± 2.5 78.0 ± 1.0 86.2 ± 1.6 0.0 ± 0.0
Stable COPD 1 71 Ex-smoker 57 47 10
2 75 Ex-smoker 46 66 6
3 61 Ex-smoker 46 47 8
4 57 Ex-smoker 38 29 12
5 59 Ex-smoker 67 66 7
6 53 Ex-smoker 29 36 11
Mean ± SE 62.7 ± 3.5 47.2 ± 5.5 48.5 ± 6.2 9.0 ± 1.0
AECOPD 1 77 Ex-smoker 40 42 10
2 72 Ex-smoker 36 27 11
3 65 Ex-smoker 28 33 16
4 56 Ex-smoker 48 61 6
5 61 Ex-smoker 69 55 4
6 67 Ex-smoker 56 60 8
Mean ± SE 66.3 ± 3.1 46.2 ± 6.0 46.3 ± 5.9 9.2 ± 1.7

aAECOPD, Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, Forced vital capacity; pred, Prediction. Data represent information gathered on days 1, 3 and 10 of hospital admission.

Table 2.

Digital evaluation score system scores a

DESS scores
Patient no. Control Stable COPD AE-1 AE-3 AE-10
1 0 30 100 78 43
2 4 27 81 66 46
3 8 35 86 76 36
4 4 55 70 51 30
5 3 38 80 71 35
6 0 47 97 81 30
Mean ± SE 3.2 ± 1.2 38.7 ± 4.3 85.7 ± 4.6 70.5 ± 4.5 36.7 ± 2.7

aAE-1, Day 1 of hospital admission; AE-3, Day 3 of hospital admission; AE-10, Day 10 of hospital admission; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DESS, Digital evaluation score system.

Gene expression profiles

The quality of the genetic data obtained after filtering and the distribution of data sets were assessed and visualized by creating box plots, which showed that there were no significant differences in the distributions of log2 ratios among the groups (see Additional file 2: Figure S1). The variation or reproducibility of gene expression between arrays of different groups was visualized and assessed by creating scatterplots, which are shown in Figure 2. There was a significant variation in gene arrays between healthy controls and patients with stable COPD or AECOPD (Figures 2A to 2D) and between patients with stable COPD and AECOPD (Figures 2E to 2G). The variation in gene array data at AE-1 and AE-3 was significantly different from that at AE-10 (Figures 2I and 2J), whereas there was no difference between AE-1 and AE-3 (Figure 2H). The results of hierarchical clustering showed gene expression profiles similar to those revealed by the scatterplots shown in Figure S2 of Additional file 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Scatterplots showing variations in gene expression profiles. Scatterplots of peripheral blood monocytes between patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable COPD) (A), acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at day 1 of hospital admission (AECOPD-D1) (B), AECOPD at day 3 of hospital admission (AECOPD-D3) (C) or AECOPD at day 10 of hospital admission (AECOPD-D10) (D) compared with healthy controls. Scatterplots also illustrate variations between AECOPD-D1 (E), AECOPD-D3 (F) or AECOPD-D10 (G) and stable COPD; between AECOPD-D3 (H) or AECOPD-D10 (I) with AECOPD-D1; and between AECOPD-D3 and AECOPD-D10 (J).

To identify differentially expressed genes, a fold change filtering between each group pair was performed with a threshold fold change ≥2.0. There were ten comparison pairs with information for fold changes and regulation (that is, SEQ-ID, log fold change, log or absolute fold change, or regulation), normalized intensities or annotations (that is, GENE_NAME, synonyms, description, NCBI_GENE_ID, chromosome, GO, UniGene ID, The Institute of Genomic Research Database-TDB (TIGRID) or Ensembl ID), as shown in Additional file 3. Table 3 shows the number of genes overexpressed more than twofold, (for example, 4,508, 3,899, 4,167 and 3,488 genes of stable, AE-1, AE-3 and AE-10, respectively, above controls; 4,067, 5,063 or 5,451 genes of AE-1, AE-3 and AE-10, respectively, above stable COPD; 586 genes of AE-3 above AE-1; and 1,735 and 1,706 genes of AE-10, respectively, above AE-1 and AE-3). Tables 4, 5 and 6, respectively, list the genes overexpressed (above controls) in PBMCs from patients with stable COPD, AE-1, AE-3 or AE-10 by more than 30-fold (Table 4), between 20- and 30-fold (Table 5) and between 15- and 20-fold (Table 6). Tables 7, 8 and 9 list the genes overexpressed (above patients with stable COPD) in PBMCs from patients with AE-1, AE-3 or AE-10 by more than 30-fold (Table 7), between 20- and 30-fold (Table 8) and between 15- and 20-fold. Table 10 presents upregulated genes in PBMCs of patients at AE-1, AE-3 or AE-10.

Table 3.

Genes upregulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells a

Fold changes in upregulated genes ( n )
Comparisons >2 >5 >8 >10 >15 >20 >30 >50 >100
Stable vs Con 4,508 671 217 145 49 27 9 1 0
AE-1 vs Con 3,899 734 334 221 136 86 40 18 3
AE-3 vs Con 4,167 742 358 259 149 97 51 17 5
AE-10 vs Con 3,488 677 331 238 116 74 35 10 1
AE-1 vs Stable 4,067 389 135 80 36 21 9 3 1
AE-3 vs Stable 5,063 620 221 146 56 24 10 1 0
AE-10 vs Stable 5,451 534 178 117 56 33 14 1 0
AE-3 vs AE-1 586 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
AE-10 vs AE-1 1,735 164 55 26 10 4 1 0 0
AE-10 vs AE-3 1,706 156 49 29 2 2 1 0 0

aData are number of upregulated genes expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy controls (Con) or of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on hospital admission day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10).

Table 4.

Genes upregulated >30-fold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells a

Stable vs control AE-1 vs control AE-3 vs control AE-10 vs control
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
31.7 REXO1L2P 30.3 HP 30.1 FOS 30.8 EMP2
33.0 DEFA1 30.5 LOC152573 30.6 BPIL1 31.0 SEPP1
33.3 DUB3 31.2 INHBA 31.0 ARG1 31.0 FOLR1
37.2 LOC402207 31.4 COL6A3 31.6 N/A 31.1 GPX3
37.3 DUB3 32.4 MPO 31.9 LOC152573 31.2 SFTPB
40.5 LOC402110 32.6 ELF3 32.5 COL6A3 31.4 S100A14
43.1 LOC653600 34.4 CLDN4 32.9 TIMP3 33.1 FOLR1
43.5 N/A 34.9 DCN 33.5 FOS 33.4 CDH5
50.7 MGC45438 35.7 CTGF 34.4 KRT19 34.9 CAV1
35.7 MMP2 34.7 INHBA 35.4 DLC1
36.2 MFAP4 35.2 HP 35.6 FOSB
37.1 EPB42 35.6 CD177 36.1 KRT19
37.2 H19 36.5 LCN2 36.4 SUSD2
37.3 ATP1B1 36.9 CTGF 36.9 FN1
37.5 INHBA 37.9 MMP8 37.2 ADH1C
38.0 AZU1 38.3 ORM1 37.2 RNASE1
38.5 LCN2 38.8 ELF3 37.3 IL1RL1
39.6 CEACAM8 38.9 DCN 41.1 FOLR1
40.3 CALCA 39.0 CTSG 41.3 DHCR24
41.4 LOC387763 39.1 CLDN4 41.3 LOC387763
42.2 CEACAM3 39.3 CALCA 42.0 ADH1B
45.9 UNQ473 40.0 DCN 43.6 LAMA3
54.0 BPIL1 40.1 FOSB 45.0 GPX3
56.2 FN1 41.1 ATP1B1 47.9 DCN
56.7 CEACAM5 41.6 MFAP4 49.1 EPAS1
58.4 MMP8 41.8 FN1 50.9 CNN3
65.0 CALCA 42.0 MMP2 51.5 DCN
66.3 BPI 42.0 GPR97 54.5 LOC653509
68.7 DEFA1 42.2 INHBA 56.2 CXCL2
72.3 COL1A2 45.5 AZU1 58.2 MGC45438
77.2 CA1 46.0 BPI 58.5 CYP4B1
80.2 PLUNC 46.4 LOC387763 59.3 CTGF
83.0 CEACAM1 46.6 MPO 75.8 GPRC5A
83.9 DEFA4 50.0 HP 88.9 TIMP3
85.0 COL3A1 50.7 ORM2 149.5 MFAP4
96.1 DEFA1 53.1 UNQ473
99.4 CEACAM5 57.8 AQP9
101.2 CEACAM1 59.6 CEACAM5
115.8 LOC653600 59.6 BPIL1
140.3 DEFA4 61.0 CEACAM1
62.8 DEFA1
66.5 CEACAM1
72.6 DEFA4
82.5 PLUNC
86.7 DEFA1
92.9 COL1A2
100.8 CEACAM5
101.1 CALCA
109.4 LOC653600
111.5 COL3A1
165.7 DEFA4

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls.

Table 5.

Genes upregulated between 20- and 30-fold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD compared with healthy control subjects a

Stable vs control AE-1 vs control AE-3 vs control AE-10 vs control
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Gene Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
20.1 P8 20.3 PLAU 20.0 ALPL 20.3 SCNN1A
20.1 REXO1L5P 21.0 COL6A3 20.1 MUC1 20.4 MGC45438
20.2 UNQ473 21.1 SLC25A37 20.2 SPDEF 20.7 FBLN1
20.2 DEFA1 21.1 HIG2 20.3 HIG2 20.7 CLDN4
20.5 LOC440015 21.2 GPRC5A 20.4 KLK11 20.9 SFTPA2
21.1 LOC391749 21.2 CFB 20.4 MGP 21.0 FKBP9
21.3 MGC45438 21.3 LTF 20.4 GPR109A 21.1 FAM107A
21.7 RP11-146D12.2 21.4 VSIG4 21.0 LOC653342 21.3 N/A
22.0 LOC399839 21.7 FOSB 21.1 CFB 21.4 C10orf10
22.9 SPDEF 21.9 SLC25A37 21.3 P8 21.5 SELENBP1
23.0 CLDN4 22.0 ARG1 21.8 PBEF1 21.6 ANXA3
24.7 LOC349196 22.0 SPDEF 21.9 S100P 21.6 IFI27
25.3 STAC2 22.2 LTF 21.9 MS4A3 21.8 C1QC
25.8 REXO1L3P 22.3 FOS 22.4 COL6A3 21.9 SEPP1
26.3 SCGB3A1 22.6 FAM46C 23.1 MANSC1 22.0 KLK11
26.9 RNASE1 22.6 ISLR 23.2 COL1A2 22.1 P8
27.0 AZGP1 22.6 COL1A2 23.2 GCA 22.1 LOC653723
29.5 H19 22.8 ATP1B1 23.3 LTBP2 22.5 LOC391359
23.8 SCNN1A 23.9 CHI3L1 22.7 LAMB2
23.8 SERPINE1 24.0 TMC5 22.8 AQP1
23.8 EPB42 24.2 CD24 24.0 C9orf61
23.8 C1QC 24.2 HP 24.1 C4BPA
23.9 RGS1 24.3 ISLR 24.2 LTBP2
23.9 ORM2 24.3 SIX1 24.3 UNQ473
24.1 COL5A1 24.5 APOE 24.5 TMEM139
24.5 MS4A3 24.6 COL3A1 24.6 N/A
25.6 CD177 24.6 LOC646309 25.7 OLFML3
25.6 APOE 24.7 CEACAM3 25.9 SNF1LK
26.4 C20orf114 24.9 AATK 25.9 A2M
26.6 BPIL1 25.3 LTF 26.4 FXYD3
27.1 CTSG 25.4 ALPL 27.0 HP
27.4 FOS 25.6 ACSL1 27.1 N/A
27.6 ALAS2 26.2 CEACAM6 27.4 LOC653509
28.0 INHBA 26.3 COL5A1 28.0 LDB2
28.0 TIMP3 26.4 KLK11 28.0 OLFML3
28.1 COL3A1 26.7 PRTN3 28.5 SFTPA1
28.1 SLC4A1 26.9 RGS1 28.6 MUC1
28.2 KLK11 27.3 KCNJ15 29.6 HSPA12B
28.2 LOC653492 27.4 CAMP 29.8 MFAP4
28.5 LOC203510 27.6 PLAU
28.7 CEACAM3 27.8 LTF
28.8 DCN 27.9 ANXA3
28.9 CEACAM1 28.0 H19
29.0 CEACAM6 28.0 SERPINE1
29.3 SELENBP1 28.1 LTF
29.7 KRT19 28.3 INHBA

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls.

Table 6.

Genes upregulated between 15- and 20-fold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD compared with healthy control subjects a

Stable vs control AE-1 vs control AE-3 vs control AE-10 vs control
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
15.2 LOC645558 15.0 CNN3 15.0 GPR109B 15.0 USP54
15.7 N/A 15.0 GPT2 15.0 LOC653492 15.0 MGC45438
15.9 LOC653455 15.1 ORM1 15.2 RNASE1 15.2 SLCO2A1
15.9 DUX4 15.1 LOC402110 15.3 FN1 15.3 AGER
16.1 LOC653768 15.1 MDK 15.5 ACSL1 15.3 FLJ11259
16.5 RAB17 15.2 ELF3 15.5 CDH5 15.5 CLEC3B
16.6 LOC653541 15.2 PSG8 15.6 FOLR3 15.8 ADCY4
16.6 LOC391763 15.3 SLC25A37 15.8 PVRL2 16.0 FN1
16.7 LOC642286 15.4 FKBP9 15.9 KRT19 16.1 HP
16.7 S100A14 15.5 C1QB 15.9 MDK 16.1 CKB
16.7 NBPF9 15.6 BPGM 16.0 APOC1 16.1 CYP4B1
16.9 PSG8 15.7 AQP9 16.3 NOL3 16.2 RARRES2
17.0 REXO1L6P 15.7 LOC402207 16.3 ATP1B1 16.3 TSPAN1
17.0 MLPH 15.7 PSG11 16.4 TMC4 16.6 SDC4
17.1 FAM90A7 16.0 KLK11 16.4 VEGF 16.7 ERG
17.4 LOC401650 16.2 KIAA0703 16.6 SPAG4 16.8 LOC653107
17.8 DUB3 16.2 IGFBP5 16.8 LIF 17.2 RAB25
17.9 MGC45438 16.2 IGFBP3 16.8 CCDC80 17.2 COL1A2
18.9 COL3A1 16.2 N/A 16.9 CEACAM3 17.3 DCN
19.1 LOC645732 16.2 SLC25A37 16.9 IGFBP3 17.5 TSPAN13
19.8 LOC392188 16.3 SIX1 17.1 CXCL2 17.6 HSD17B6
20.0 MUC1 16.3 LOC645009 17.2 FKBP9 17.8 RHOB
16.4 C1QA 17.2 CEACAM1 17.9 KRT19
16.5 UBD 17.7 ELF3 18.0 AQP9
16.6 LOC653342 17.7 CNN3 18.2 FOLR1
17.0 GPR97 17.8 PGLYRP1 18.2 IL1RL1
17.1 COL1A1 17.9 KRT23 18.2 SERPING1
17.3 ALPL 18.1 SLC44A4 18.3 MGC35295
17.4 FBLN1 18.1 SCNN1A 18.4 FLJ43663
17.5 HIG2 18.4 FBLN1 18.6 TGM2
17.7 COL8A1 18.5 HPR 18.6 ADH1C
17.9 TMC5 18.6 SYT7 18.7 KIAA1026
18.1 LTBP2 18.6 CEACAM8 19.1 DKFZP686A01247
18.4 SLC25A37 18.8 C1R 19.2 CCDC48
18.7 CEACAM3 18.8 COL1A1 19.2 ANKRD25
18.9 MPO 18.9 COL8A1 19.3 DMBT1
19.0 CD24 18.9 C1QC 19.4 MALL
19.0 CHI3L1 18.9 SFRP2 19.5 ANXA8
19.0 DCN 19.0 HIG2 19.5 SPRY4
19.1 P8 19.2 C1QB 19.7 ELF3
19.1 CEACAM6 19.2 GPRC5A 19.9 EHD2
19.1 ACSL1 19.3 MMP25 20.0 DCN
19.5 PRTN3 19.3 UBD
19.5 LIF 19.3 GADD45A
19.6 LTF 19.4 ISLR
19.7 ANXA3 19.5 ORM1
19.7 C1R 19.5 C20orf114
19.7 MUC1 19.5 LOC203510
19.8 PSG4 19.6 DCN
19.9 HP 19.7 FN1
19.8 DAAM2
19.9 FOLR3

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls.

Table 7.

Genes upregulated >30-fold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD compared to patients with stable COPD a

AE-1 vs stable AE-3 vs stable AE-10 vs stable
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
37.3 MMP8 33.2 LOC646309 30.0 CCDC48
37.6 CEACAM5 34.7 SERPINE1 31.9 LOC653509
38.6 PLUNC 34.9 FOS 32.0 EPAS1
39.4 BPIL1 37.6 CYR61 32.2 CDH5
40.3 CYR61 39.5 CEACAM5 34.4 CLDN5
45.4 CEACAM5 39.6 PLUNC 36.3 SEPP1
55.2 CALCA 40.1 ARG1 38.7 CAV1
56.0 VSIG4 43.5 BPIL1 39.2 CYR61
103.9 CA1 46.0 CEACAM5 42.1 ADH1B
85.9 CALCA 44.2 CTGF
44.9 CAV1
45.1 GPRC5A
49.8 SEPP1
81.4 GPX3

aData are from patients with patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission, as compared to patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable).

Table 8.

Genes upregulated between 20- and 30-fold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD compared to patients with stable COPD a

AE-1 vs stable AE-3 vs stable AE-10 vs stable
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
20.1 MS4A3 20.5 GPR97 20.3 TIMP3
21.0 CEACAM6 20.6 ALPL 20.3 SLC6A4
21.1 SLC25A37 20.7 MTHFS 20.4 SFTPA2
21.2 DCN 21.0 FLJ32028 20.6 AKAP2
22.4 SPP1 21.4 ADM 20.7 DST
24.0 TCN1 23.3 ACSL1 21.2 TCF21
24.7 BPIL1 23.3 DCN 21.5 ADH1C
26.4 SLC25A37 24.3 MMP8 21.6 SLIT3
26.6 CTGF 24.5 TCN1 21.7 C9orf61
28.5 ARG1 25.3 FOS 22.5 FOSB
28.6 FOS 25.3 FOSB 25.5 MFAP4
29.5 SERPINE1 27.5 CTGF 26.0 GPX3
28.3 BPIL1 26.5 DCN
28.4 VSIG4 26.9 SFTPB
27.6 FBLN5
28.1 LOC653509
28.5 ADH1C
28.7 SFTPA1
28.7 TIMP3

aData are from patients with patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission, as compared to patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable).

Table 9.

Genes upregulated between 15- and 20-fold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD compared to patients with stable COPD a

AE-1 vs stable AE-3 vs stable AE-10 vs stable
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
15.6 ADM 15.2 LOC387763 15.0 VSIG4
15.8 DEFA4 15.2 MMP25 15.6 IL1RL1
16.2 DEFA4 15.3 USP15 15.8 PZP
16.2 C1R 15.5 C1R 16.0 LDB2
16.9 GPNMB 15.8 KCNJ15 16.2 FLJ43663
17.2 DCN 15.9 GADD45A 16.5 N/A
17.3 FAM46C 15.9 LRRC4 16.6 CD55
17.6 ALAS2 16.3 GLT1D1 16.8 CXCL2
17.6 CALCA 16.4 CD55 16.9 IL1RL1
17.9 GPNMB 16.5 CEACAM6 17.0 RHOB
18.2 DUSP1 16.6 SPP1 17.1 DLC1
18.2 CEACAM6 16.7 SLC25A37 17.2 VIPR1
18.2 SLC25A37 17.1 ORM1 17.2 CRYAB
18.7 FOS 17.2 CALCA 17.8 CNN3
18.9 SLC25A37 17.3 DUSP1 18.1 DCN
17.5 CD177 18.1 IFI27
17.6 GPNMB 18.2 SLIT2
17.7 MS4A3 18.3 RASIP1
17.8 DCN 18.8 MFAP4
17.8 GPR109A 19.0 CAMK2N1
17.9 BASP1 19.0 CD55
17.9 IL8RB 19.5 AGER
18.4 AQP9 19.9 DKFZP686A01247
18.7 DEFA4
18.8 QPCT
19.0 PBEF1
19.0 BASP1
19.0 CEACAM6
19.2 GNG10
19.7 GPNMB
19.7 GCA
20.0 RNASE3

aData are from patients with patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission, as compared to patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable).

Table 10.

Genes upregulated more than fivefold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD a

AE-3 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-3
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
5.1 TMEM50A 10.3 SUSD2 10.1 SLCO2A1
5.2 BCL2A1 10.6 TCF21 10.1 OAS3
5.3 C6orf32 10.6 FOLR1 10.1 C4BPA
6.0 PI3 10.7 C9orf61 10.2 DMBT1
7.0 KCNJ15 10.9 LOC653107 10.4 VSIG2
7.6 CISH 11.3 AGER 10.4 LOC653107
10.4 CISH 12.0 SLIT2 10.5 ITLN2
10.7 CISH 12.7 ITLN2 10.7 CX3CR1
12.9 FLRT3 10.7 MSLN
13.1 VIPR1 10.8 SOCS2
13.2 SOCS2 10.9 LOC653107
13.3 IL1RL1 11.7 FOLR1
13.4 LOC653107 11.7 GPX3
13.8 C4BPA 11.8 CLIC5
14.4 CYP4B1 11.8 SLIT2
14.4 LAMA3 11.9 LOC653107
15.1 CYP4B1 12.1 AQP1
15.2 ADH1C 12.6 LOC653509
15.7 MGC35295 12.6 ADH1C
15.8 GPX3 12.7 ADH1C
17.0 IL1RL1 12.8 ADH1B
17.9 MSLN 12.9 LAMA3
20.0 ADH1C 13.6 IL1RL1
22.4 ADH1B 13.6 CYP4B1
24.5 SLC6A4 13.9 FAM107A
35.3 FOLR1 14.2 LOC653107
14.9 CYP4B1
22.0 MGC35295
31.2 SLC6A4

aData are from day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission.

Table 11 lists the number of genes downregulated more than twofold, including 4,516, 2,975, 3,426 and 2,798 genes of PBMCs from patients with stable COPD on AE-1, AE-3 and AE-10, respectively, below controls; 3,207, 4,510 and 5288 genes on AE-1, AE-3 and AE-10, respectively, below stable COPD; 598 genes from AE-3 below AE-1; and 2,162 and 1,918 genes from AE-10 below those from AE-1 and AE-3, respectively. Downregulated genes of PBMCs from patients with stable COPD, AE-1, AE-3 or AE-10 greater than tenfold, between 10- and 8-fold or between 8- and 6-fold below healthy control subjects are listed in Tables 12, 13 and 14, respectively. Downregulated genes of PBMCs from patients at AE-1, AE-3 or AE-10 compared to stable COPD, or among patients with AECOPD, are shown in Tables 15 and 16.

Table 11.

Number of downregulated genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy control subjects, patients with stable COPD and patients with AECOPD a

Fold changes in upregulated genes ( n )
Compared pairs >2 >5 >6 >8 >10 >15 >20 >30 >50 >100
Stable vs Con 4,516 135 55 9 4 2 1 0 0 0
AE-1 vs Con 2,975 182 107 47 22 7 4 1 0 0
AE-3 vs Con 3,426 225 149 65 35 11 5 2 0 0
AE-10 vs Con 2,798 124 73 31 16 2 1 1 0 0
AE-1 vs Stable 3,207 33 16 4 4 2 0 0 0 0
AE-3 vs Stable 4,510 125 71 21 8 3 1 0 0 0
AE-10 vs Stable 5,288 445 236 97 49 20 8 3 0 0
AE-3 vs AE-1 598 32 23 17 5 3 2 0 0 0
AE-10 vs AE-1 2,162 261 168 82 43 21 14 10 5 1
AE-10 vs AE-3 1,918 192 130 66 36 15 9 6 4 0

aData are from controls (Con) or patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of the hospital admission.

Table 12.

Genes downregulated more than tenfold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD compared to healthy control subjects a

Stable vs Con AE-1 vs Con AE-3 vs Con AE-10 vs Con
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
10.7 EIF3S6 10.3 HAND1 10.2 GZMK 10.0 C21orf7
10.7 YLPM1 10.3 CD8B 10.5 CXCR3 10.0 NELL2
16.1 TFCP2L1 10.4 UBASH3A 10.6 AK5 10.4 C21orf7
21.0 SCP2 10.8 TRA@ 10.7 TRA@ 10.4 GFI1B
10.9 TRBV3-1 10.7 IL24 10.5 LOC129293
11.2 CD8B 10.9 CD6 10.5 LOC123876
11.4 MAL 10.9 N/A 10.7 HIST1H3H
11.4 LOC643514 11.2 KIAA0748 11.1 IL24
11.5 NELL2 11.4 LCK 11.4 GFI1B
11.7 TTC24 11.5 CD8B 11.9 CRTAC1
12.7 CD8B 12.3 APBB1 11.9 OR10A4
13.1 LEF1 12.3 IL12RB1 11.9 SAA3P
13.8 TCF7 12.5 TTC24 12.7 TTC24
14.2 LOC129293 12.5 GFI1B 14.9 TFCP2L1
14.5 LOC129293 12.5 CRTAC1 18.6 SCP2
15.6 TCF7 12.6 TRBV3-1 32.3 UNQ470
16.1 TCF7 12.6 ATG9B
16.8 CD8B 12.9 ABLIM1
21.8 TFCP2L1 12.9 LOC129293
25.4 CRTAC1 13.0 CD8B
27.9 SCP2 13.1 CD28
44.1 UNQ470 13.1 GRAP2
14.3 UBASH3A
14.4 CCR7
15.0 LOC129293
16.0 CD8B
18.1 UNQ470
18.7 SCP2
18.8 LEF1
19.3 LEF1
23.5 CD8B
24.3 TCF7
25.1 TCF7
30.4 TCF7
32.0 TFCP2L1

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of the hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls (Con).

Table 13.

Genes downregulated between eight- and tenfold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD compared to healthy control subjects a

Stable vs Con AE-1 vs Con AE-3 vs Con AE-10 vs Con
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
8.2 AK5 8.1 CD3G 8.0 TRBV19 8.1 HFE2
8.6 TRA@ 8.2 LY9 8.0 OTOA 8.2 TRA@
9.1 ZC3HAV1 8.2 AK5 8.1 CD7 8.6 UNQ470
9.3 MAL 8.2 C21orf7 8.1 GRAP2 8.6 CD248
9.7 TMEM50B 8.2 TRBC1 8.1 TNFRSF25 8.6 XG
8.3 ANKDD1A 8.2 C21orf7 8.7 ATG9B
8.4 CD6 8.2 EPHA6 8.8 LOC339778
8.4 RPS6KB1 8.2 GIMAP5 8.9 TCF7
8.5 TMEM50B 8.3 1-Sep 8.9 CCR7
8.7 YLPM1 8.3 UBASH3A 9.2 LOC644663
8.7 TRBV19 8.4 GIMAP7 9.4 LOC129293
8.8 FLT3LG 8.5 MGC23244 9.5 MGC39606
8.9 N/A 8.6 LOC645852 9.7 GZMK
9.1 LEF1 8.7 SCAP1 9.9 AK5
9.1 GZMK 9.0 HIST1H3H 9.9 TCF7
9.1 KIAA0748 9.0 HFE2
9.2 ABLIM1 9.2 GFI1B
9.5 C21orf7 9.2 TMEM50B
9.5 ATG9B 9.5 N/A
9.6 LCK 9.5 C21orf7
9.6 LOC647353 9.6 GATA3
9.8 CCR7 9.7 C21orf7
9.8 UNQ470 9.7 CD247
9.9 OR10A4 9.8 LCK
9.9 IL12RB1 9.8 KSP37
9.9 FAIM3
9.9 SPOCK2
9.9 TRA@
9.9 SH2D1B
10.0 GRAP2

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of the hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls (Con).

Table 14.

Genes downregulated between six- and eightfold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD compared to healthy control subjects a

Stable vs Con AE-1 vs Con AE-3 vs Con AE-10 vs Con
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
6.0 NDUFV3 6.0 MAL 6.0 IL7R 6.0 HKDC1
6.0 C17orf45 6.0 ARHGAP12 6.0 CD28 6.1 TANC2
6.1 MAL 6.0 TRAPPC4 6.0 KIR2DS1 6.1 FAM5B
6.1 CXCR6 6.0 GNLY 6.0 FLJ20647 6.2 KIAA0748
6.1 SUCLA2 6.0 N/A 6.1 N/A 6.3 CD40LG
6.1 C21orf7 6.0 LOC642376 6.1 CLDN1 6.3 PCDH10
6.2 TNPO1 6.0 MYOZ3 6.1 TRBV5-4 6.3 LOC644273
6.2 LOC643514 6.1 FLJ20647 6.1 CARD11 6.3 CD96
6.2 ALS2CR13 6.1 CD96 6.1 LOC441320 6.3 TRA@
6.2 CREB1 6.2 MAL 6.1 ACADSB 6.3 TRBV3-1
6.2 C17orf45 6.2 GIMAP5 6.1 NXPH4 6.4 TRA@
6.3 NELL2 6.2 CLDN1 6.2 SCNN1D 6.4 LOC642483
6.3 C6orf32 6.2 CD3D 6.2 MTMR1 6.5 ANKDD1A
6.3 LOC642455 6.2 LY9 6.2 MAL 6.5 N/A
6.4 GMDS 6.3 LOC123876 6.2 ZAP70 6.5 N/A
6.4 ABHD6 6.3 TNFRSF25 6.3 MAL 6.5 LY9
6.4 DAPP1 6.3 C21orf7 6.3 IL2RB 6.6 CD8B
6.4 SH3BGRL 6.3 LOC645885 6.3 EDG8 6.6 MGC26597
6.5 IL7R 6.3 BLOC1S3 6.3 HKDC1 6.7 TRBV19
6.6 LOC441601 6.3 LOC644727 6.3 SCAP1 6.7 LOC145783
6.6 GPR18 6.4 CCDC45 6.3 LOC440455 6.8 CD8B
6.7 P2RX5 6.4 C21orf7 6.3 CD300E 6.9 C21orf7
6.7 LY9 6.5 CD28 6.4 LY9 6.9 UBASH3A
6.8 GGPS1 6.5 LOC440455 6.4 KIR2DS2 7.0 LOC400768
6.8 EIF3S6 6.5 IL24 6.4 SLAMF6 7.1 CD8B
6.8 ARHGAP15 6.5 GHRL 6.4 SAA3P 7.1 HAND1
6.8 SF3B1 6.5 FAM113B 6.4 SF3A2 7.2 LOC126075
6.8 GPR89A 6.5 LOC644663 6.5 UNQ470 7.2 TNFRSF7
6.9 LOC129293 6.5 C15orf37 6.5 C6orf21 7.3 LEF1
6.9 CPNE3 6.5 MAL 6.6 CD96 7.3 HLA-DOA
6.9 LY9 6.5 LOC644445 6.6 CD244 7.4 LOC646279
7.0 PIP3-E 6.6 LOC126075 6.6 N/A 7.4 YLPM1
7.0 TAF9 6.6 1-Sep 6.6 KLRK1 7.4 LOC643514
7.0 N/A 6.6 UBASH3A 6.6 C16orf5 7.5 MTMR1
7.0 KIAA0748 6.7 SAA3P 6.6 TRBC1 7.6 NOG
7.1 CD55 6.8 CD6 6.6 LOC339778 7.7 TCF7
7.2 EIF3S6 6.8 TRBV5-4 6.7 GNLY 7.7 KIAA0748
7.2 PGRMC2 6.9 1-Sep 6.7 LDLRAP1 7.7 C21orf7
7.3 C21orf7 6.9 LOC129293 6.8 HAND1 7.7 PRDM9
7.4 PSMD6 7.0 SCNN1D 6.8 CD3D 7.7 FCER2
7.5 ABLIM1 7.0 SIT1 6.8 FLJ45825 7.9 CD8B
7.6 STAG2 7.1 GATA3 6.8 SF3A2 8.0 LEF1
7.8 CCDC45 7.1 CD7 6.8 CXCR3
7.8 UNQ470 7.1 CDKN3 6.8 KIR3DL3
7.9 LY9 7.2 SCAP1 6.8 LAT
8.0 CD40LG 7.3 TRA@ 6.9 CD52
7.3 LY9 6.9 TNFRSF7
7.3 DDAH1 6.9 LOC442726
7.3 TRA@ 6.9 3-Sep
7.5 TNFRSF7 6.9 KIAA0748
7.5 KIAA0748 6.9 XG
7.6 ITM2A 6.9 KIAA1549
7.6 CD5 7.0 RNF157
7.6 D4S234E 7.0 SIT1
7.6 CD300E 7.0 CD1C
7.7 APBB1 7.0 SLC16A10
7.8 CD3D 7.0 CD3G
7.8 LCK 7.1 CD6
7.8 UBASH3A 7.1 LY9
7.9 XG 7.1 FLT3LG
7.1 LOC647353
7.2 LOC123876
7.2 CX3CR1
7.2 LOC126075
7.3 NELL2
7.4 LY9
7.4 MAL
7.4 KIR2DS2
7.4 CHIA
7.4 BIN1
7.5 CCDC78
7.5 MAL
7.5 C21orf7
7.5 KIR2DL4
7.6 CD6
7.6 CD3D
7.7 1-Sep
7.7 LCK
7.8 ITM2A
7.8 TRA@
7.9 SIT1
7.9 CD5
8.0 CD8A
8.0 LOC129293

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) after the hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls (Con).

Table 15.

Genes downregulated more than fivefold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD compared to patients with stable COPD a

AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Stable
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
5.0 PRODH 10.2 KSP37 10.1 LOC646781
5.1 MT1F 10.3 DUB3 10.1 LOC389634
5.1 OR2A7 10.6 DUB3 10.1 LOC441056
5.3 CD8B 10.8 TCF7 10.1 LOC340243
5.4 CGI-38 11.2 CX3CR1 10.2 C1QL2
5.4 DMBT1 17.6 MGC35295 10.2 LOC653541
5.4 N/A 19.9 STAC2 10.2 LOC158318
5.4 GNLY 25.0 AZGP1 10.3 N/A
5.5 LCK 10.4 LOC644373
5.5 DZIP1 10.6 SPDEF
5.6 TCF7 10.7 DUX1
5.6 MGC45438 10.9 LOC643001
5.6 UNQ470 11.1 LOC391767
5.8 MGLL 11.2 LOC645509
5.8 B4GALNT3 11.7 FLJ36131
5.9 CGI-38 11.8 LOC441323
5.9 CGI-38 11.9 LOC440015
6.1 LOC388886 11.9 LOC441812
6.1 GNLY 12.0 TCEB3C
6.2 N/A 12.1 SPDEF
6.4 CD8B 12.3 DUX4
6.4 AEBP2 12.5 LOC285697
6.4 EDG8 12.9 LOC646066
6.5 PRDM16 13.3 LOC441873
6.8 CX3CR1 13.6 LOC645402
7.0 MGC45438 13.7 LOC285563
7.3 MST1 13.9 LOC391763
7.4 LOC644088 14.4 DUB3
7.5 EDG8 14.7 LOC391766
10.1 MGC45438 15.0 LOC392197
12.6 MGC35295 15.0 REXO1L2P
15.5 STAC2 15.2 DUB3
19.1 AZGP1 15.2 LOC402199
15.7 LOC653442
15.8 LOC653455
16.0 LOC402207
16.5 LOC391745
16.7 LOC392188
18.1 REXO1L6P
19.1 LOC391764
19.4 DUB3
20.6 LOC645836
21.0 LOC391749
23.8 LOC402110
24.2 REXO1L7P
29.6 REXO1L1
30.0 STAC2
33.5 REXO1L3P
39.7 REXO1L5P

aData are from patients acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) after the hospital admission, as compared to patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Stable).

Table 16.

Genes downregulated more than fivefold in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD a

AE-3 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-3
Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes Fold changes Genes
5.0 ITGB3 10.2 MPO 10.3 MOXD1
5.1 CGI-69 10.4 LOC653492 10.3 LOC152573
5.2 SPTB 10.5 SPP1 10.7 SPDEF
5.2 BCL2L1 10.6 ANK1 10.8 CCDC80
5.2 GATA1 11.0 DEFA4 11.0 CTSG
5.3 FBXO7 11.0 MOXD1 11.0 CAMP
5.6 SELENBP1 11.0 HIG2 11.3 PLA2G2D
5.8 OSBP2 11.1 OSBP2 11.4 SPP1
5.9 LOC643855 11.2 REXO1L3P 11.6 S100P
6.1 ERAF 11.6 SPDEF 11.7 SLC4A11
6.2 EPB49 12.0 COL1A1 11.8 COL3A1
6.2 MYH9 12.2 BPI 11.8 SPAG4
6.4 ALAS2 12.3 SNCA 12.5 THBS2
7.4 LOC644462 12.3 SLC4A11 12.7 MPO
7.8 GMPR 12.5 COL1A1 13.0 PRTN3
8.1 ANK1 12.6 AZU1 13.2 COL1A1
8.9 BPGM 12.6 ARG1 13.3 ELA2
9.1 FAM46C 13.2 GREM1 14.3 LIF
9.2 LOC643497 13.5 DEFA4 14.4 CEACAM5
9.4 TRIM58 13.5 ELA2 14.6 RNF183
9.4 MBNL3 14.2 CEACAM5 14.9 B3Gn-T6
9.5 EPB49 14.5 ITGA11 15.1 AZU1
9.6 EPB49 15.0 CEACAM8 15.4 ITGA11
9.6 EPB42 15.3 SPTB 15.9 DEFA4
9.7 EPB41 15.6 CEACAM5 16.4 CEACAM5
9.7 SLC14A1 16.6 LIF 17.5 MS4A3
9.9 EPB42 17.1 TRIM58 17.8 ARG1
10.1 SNCA 19.2 THY1 20.4 THY1
13.5 TRIM58 19.5 MS4A3 21.1 MS4A3
19.7 SLC4A1 23.1 TRIM58 22.5 SPP1
20.7 EPB41 24.1 MS4A3 34.4 SFRP2
21.6 CA1 27.1 SFRP2 49.9 PLUNC
29.9 EPB42 57.1 CALCA
30.4 SPP1 68.9 CALCA
41.9 ALAS2 80.4 BPIL1
43.8 EPB42 93.1 BPIL1
44.2 CALCA
48.5 PLUNC
55.5 SLC4A1
58.6 CALCA
70.0 BPIL1
84.3 BPIL1
109.9 CA1

aData are from patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) after the hospital admission.

COPD-specific genes

To search for COPD-specific genes, co–differentially expressed genes of PBMCs from patients with stable COPD or AECOPD were compared with those from control subjects (listed in Additional file 4). There were five groups and four comparison pairs with information regarding fold changes and regulation (that is, SEQ-ID, fold change, log or absolute fold change, or regulation), normalized intensities or annotations (that is, GENE_NAME, synonyms, description, NCBI_GENE_ID, chromosome, GO, UniGene ID, TIGRID or Ensembl ID). Seventy-nine genes were upregulated and 23 genes downregulated in PBMCs from patients with COPD, including both stable COPD and AECOPD, as compared to the healthy control subjects, as shown in Table 17. Of them, 14 genes were upregulated and 2 were downregulated more than tenfold, as compared to control subjects, including carcinoembryonic antigen–related cell adhesion molecule 1, collagen type VIα3(VI), collagen type I(α)2(I), nucleolar protein 3 (apoptosis repressor with CARD domain), melanophilin, cell surface–associated mucin 1, nuclear protein 1, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 17, claudin 4, ribonuclease 1, imprinted maternally expressed transcript, defensin α1, transcription factor CP2-like 1 and sterol carrier protein 2 (SCP2).

Table 17.

Number and details of co–differentially up- or downregulated genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable COPD or AECOPD compared to healthy control subjects a

Fold change >5 >10
Upregulated 79 14
Downregulated 23 2
Unexpressed genes (>10)
SEQ-ID Gene name Full name of gene Stable vs Con AE-1 vs Con AE-3 vs Con AE-10 vs Con
D12502 CEACAM1 Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 10.1 83.0 66.5 10.5
NM_004369 COL6A3 Collagen, type VI, α3 10.4 21.0 22.4 10.8
AF064599 NOL3 Nucleolar protein 3 (apoptosis repressor with CARD domain) 12.1 13.6 16.3 11.5
BC042586 COL1A2 Collagen, type I, α2 13.1 72.3 92.9 17.2
BC014473 CEACAM1 Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 14.7 101.2 61.0 11.8
AY358857 MLPH Melanophilin 17.0 10.3 12.8 12.2
AF348143 MUC1 Mucin 1, cell surface-associated 20.0 19.7 20.1 28.6
NM_012385 P8 p8 protein (candidate of metastasis 1) 20.1 19.1 21.3 22.1
BC093946 UNQ473 DMC 20.2 45.9 53.1 24.3
NM_001305 CLDN4 Claudin 4 23.0 34.4 39.1 20.7
NM_002933 RNASE1 Ribonuclease, RNase A family, 1 (pancreatic) 26.9 12.5 15.2 37.2
BC053636 H19 H19, imprinted maternally expressed untranslated mRNA 29.5 37.2 28.0 11.8
BC069423 DEFA1 Defensin, α1 33.0 96.1 86.7 10.2
XM_928349 LOC653600 Similar to neutrophil defensin 1 precursor (HNP-1) (HP-1) (HP1) (defensin, α1) 43.1 115.8 109.4 12.8
Downregulated genes (>5)
SEQ-ID Gene name Full name of genes Stable vs Con AE-1 vs Con AE-3 vs Con AE-10 vs Con
M38056 HLA-DOA Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DOα 5.3 5.9 5.6 7.3
AY209188 SAA3P Serum amyloid A3 pseudogene 5.3 6.7 6.4 11.9
BC069511 UBASH3A Ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing, A 5.5 10.4 14.3 6.9
AJ421515 CRTAC1 Cartilage acidic protein 1 5.6 25.4 12.5 11.9
AL133666 EPHA6 EPH receptor A6 5.6 5.8 8.2 5.3
NM_020152 C21orf7 Chromosome 21 open reading frame 7 5.7 8.2 9.7 10.4
XM_089384 TTC24 Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 24 5.8 11.7 12.5 12.7
NM_006850 IL24 Interleukin 24 6.0 6.5 10.7 11.1
AL713701 C21orf7 Chromosome 21 open reading frame 7 6.1 9.5 9.5 10.0
XM_931594 LOC643514 Hypothetical protein LOC643514 6.2 11.4 5.7 7.4
NM_006159 NELL2 NEL-like 2 (chicken) 6.3 11.5 7.3 10.0
NM_002348 LY9 Lymphocyte antigen 9 6.7 8.2 7.4 6.5
XM_934852 LOC129293 Hypothetical protein LOC129293 6.9 14.5 12.9 9.4
BC062589 LY9 Lymphocyte antigen 9 6.9 7.3 7.1 5.5
XM_934149 KIAA0748 KIAA0748 7.0 7.5 11.2 6.2
BC008567 C21orf7 Chromosome 21 open reading frame 7 7.3 6.3 7.5 7.7
NM_138363 CCDC45 Coiled-coil domain containing 45 7.8 6.4 5.9 5.2
BC022101 UNQ470 GAAI470 7.8 44.1 18.1 32.3
BC027920 LY9 Lymphocyte antigen 9 7.9 6.2 5.8 5.3
BC033896 AK5 Adenylate kinase 5 8.2 8.2 10.6 9.9
XM_085151 YLPM1 YLP motif containing 1 10.7 8.7 5.1 7.4
NM_014553 TFCP2L1 Transcription factor CP2-like 1 16.1 21.8 32.0 14.9
NM_001007098 SCP2 Sterol carrier protein 2 21.0 27.9 18.7 18.6

aData are from patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (stable) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of the hospital admission, as compared to healthy controls (Con).

AECOPD-specific genes

To search for AECOPD-specific genes, co–differentially expressed genes of PBMCs from patients with AECOPD on days 1, 3 and 10 were compared to those from either patients with stable COPD or healthy control subjects (listed in Additional file 4). There were five groups and six comparison pairs with information regarding fold changes and regulation (that is, SEQ-ID, fold change, log or absolute fold change, or regulation), normalized intensities or annotations (that is, GENE_NAME, synonyms, description, NCBI_GENE_ID, chromosome, GO, UniGene ID, TIGRID or Ensembl ID). As compared with both patients with stable COPD and healthy control subjects, 58 genes were upregulated more than fivefold and 238 downregulated more than twofold in patients with AECOPD. Of them, eight upregulated (more than tenfold) and eight downregulated (more than threefold) genes are listed in Table 18. These genes include FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homologue (FOS); interferon α-inducible protein 27 (IFI27); cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member A (GPRC5A); FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homologue B (FOSB); decorin (DCN); hypothetical LOC387763 (LOC387763); killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor, two domains, short cytoplasmic tail, 2 (KIR2DS2); SH2 domain containing 1B (SH2D1B); CD8b molecule (CD8B); olfactory receptor family 2, subfamily W, member 5 (OR2W5); fibroblast growth factor binding protein 2 (FGF2); and transcription factor 7 (TCF7).

Table 18.

Number of co–differentially up- or downregulated genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD compared to patients with stable COPD and healthy control subjects a

Fold change >5 >10
Upregulated 58 8
Fold change >2 >3
Downregulated 238 8
Selected co–differentially upregulated genes (>10-fold)
SEQ_ID Gene name AE-1 AE-3 AE-10
AE-1 vs Con AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Con AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Con AE-10 vs Stable
BC004490 FOS 27.4 28.6 33.5 34.9 13.2 13.7
BC015492 IFI27 12.3 10.3 13.1 11.0 21.6 18.1
NM_001554 CYR61 12.0 40.3 11.2 37.6 11.7 39.2
NM_001901 CTGF 35.7 26.6 36.9 27.5 59.3 44.2
NM_003979 GPRC5A 21.2 12.6 19.2 11.4 75.8 45.1
NM_006732 FOSB 21.7 13.7 40.1 25.3 35.6 22.5
NM_133504 DCN 19.0 17.2 19.6 17.8 20.0 18.1
XM_373497 LOC387763 41.4 13.5 46.4 15.2 41.3 13.5
Selected co–differentially downregulated genes (>3-fold)
SEQ_ID Gene names AE-1 AE-3 AE-10
AE-1 vs Con AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Con AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Con AE-10 vs Stable
AJ002102 KIR2DS2 3.7 3.8 7.4 7.6 4.2 4.4
BC022407 SH2D1B 3.0 3.7 4.8 5.9 3.1 3.8
BC066595 SH2D1B 3.6 3.2 9.9 8.9 3.6 3.2
BC100911 CD8B 11.2 4.4 16.0 6.3 7.9 3.1
NM_001004698 OR2W5 3.7 3.1 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.1
NM_004931 CD8B 10.3 5.3 11.5 5.9 6.6 3.4
NM_031950 KSP37 4.8 5.0 9.8 10.2 3.0 3.1
NM_201633 TCF7 15.6 5.6 30.4 10.8 8.9 3.2

aData are from acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of the hospital admission, as compared to patients with stable COPD (Stable) or healthy controls (Con).

Dynamic change in gene expression in patients with AECOPD

Dynamic changes (down–down, down–up, up–down and up–up) of co–differentially expressed genes of PBMCs from patients with AECOPD are listed in Additional file 4, including fold changes and regulation (that is, SEQ-ID, fold change, log or absolute fold change, or regulation), normalized intensities or annotations (that is, GENE_NAME, synonyms, description, NCBI_GENE_ID, chromosome, GO, UniGene ID, TIGRID or Ensembl ID). Table 19 shows the dynamic changes in the patterns of down–down (52 genes), down–up (131 genes), up–down (238 genes) and up–up (8 genes) more than twofold, as compared with the gene expression on the previous day. The major genes of PBMCs from patients with AECOPD were aminolevulinate, delta-, synthase 2 (ALAS2), erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.2 (EPB42) and carbonic anhydrase I (CA1) in a down–down pattern; selenium-binding protein 1 (SELENBP1) and myosin heavy chain 9, non-muscle (MYH9), in a down–up pattern; HLA complex group 27 (HCG27), BCL2-related protein A1 (BCL2A1), G protein–coupled receptors 109A and 109B (GPR109A and GPR109B) in an up–down pattern; and zeta protein kinase C (PRKCZ), ATP-binding cassette, subfamily A, member 8 (ABCA8), and folate receptor 1 (adult) (FOLR1) in an up–up pattern (Table 19). Levels of genes from patients with AECOPD were also compared with those from patients with stable COPD, as shown in Figure 3, where positive or negative values indicate up- or downregulation as compared with those from patients with stable COPD. When correlated with DESS, ALAS2 and CA1 had similar patterns of change with DESS.

Table 19.

Number of genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AECOPD a

Down–down Down–up Up–down Up–up
Total 353 784 1,005 127
>2-fold 52 131 238 8
>4-fold 3 3 7 0
>5-fold 2 0 0 0
Selected co–differentially expressed genes at the down–down pattern (>4-fold)
SEQ-ID Gene name Full name of gene AE-3 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-3
NM_000032 ALAS2 Aminolevulinate, delta-, synthase 2 6.4 6.5
BC099627 EPB42 Erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.2 9.9 4.4
BC027890 CA1 Carbonic anhydrase I 21.6 5.1
Selected co–differentially expressed genes at the down–up pattern (>4-fold)
SEQ-ID Gene name Full name of gene AE-3 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-3
AK127453 N/A Homo sapiens cDNA FLJ45545 fis, clone BRTHA2034281. 4.7 5.7
NM_003944 SELENBP1 Selenium-binding protein 1 5.6 4.1
BC090921 MYH9 Myosin, heavy chain 9, non-muscle 6.2 4.1
Selected co–differentially expressed genes at the up–down pattern (>4-fold)
SEQ-ID Gene name Full name of gene AE-3 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-3
NM_181717 HCG27 HLA complex group 27 4.1 7.3
NM_177551 GPR109A G protein-coupled receptor 109A 4.3 7.5
NM_006018 GPR109B G protein-coupled receptor 109B 4.4 5.1
AF249277 MTHFS 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate synthetase (5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase) 4.6 5.3
AY234180 BCL2A1 BCL2-related protein A1 5.2 4.0
BC010952 PI3 Peptidase inhibitor 3, skin-derived (SKALP) 6.0 4.4
NM_002243 KCNJ15 Potassium inwardly rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15 7.0 4.8
Selected co–differentially expressed genes at the up–up pattern (>2-fold)
SEQ-ID Gene name Full name of gene AE-3 vs AE-1 AE-10 vs AE-3
Z15108 PRKCZ Protein kinase C, zeta 2.0 2.8
BC037798 CGI-38 Brain-specific protein 2.0 2.4
NM_001033581 PRKCZ Protein kinase C, zeta 2.1 2.8
NM_007168 ABCA8 ATP-binding cassette, subfamily A, member 8 2.1 4.0
AK022468 SORBS1 Sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1 2.3 3.5
NM_006403 NEDD9 Neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally downregulated 9 2.3 2.2
NM_023037 FRY Furry homologue (Drosophila) 2.3 2.1
NM_016730 FOLR1 Folate receptor 1 (adult) 3.0 11.7
Down–down GENE_NAME SEQ_ID AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Stable
ALAS2 NM_000032 17.64 2.76 −2.37
EPB42 BC099627 10.02 1.01 −4.37
CA1 BC027890 103.93 4.81 −1.06
Down–up GENE_NAME SEQ_ID AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Stable
N/A AK127453 −1.69 −7.90 −1.38
SELENBP1 NM_003944 3.97 −1.41 2.92
MYH9 BC090921 −1.36 −8.40 −2.04
Up–down GENE_NAME SEQ_ID AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Stable
HCG27 NM_181717 1.09 4.47 −1.63
GPR109A NM_177551 4.12 17.79 2.36
GPR109B NM_006018 2.64 11.64 2.28
MTHFS AF249277 4.51 20.75 3.95
BCL2A1 AY234180 2.38 12.45 3.11
PI3 BC010952 1.03 6.20 1.42
KCNJ15 NM_002243 2.25 15.78 3.26
Up–up GENE_NAME SEQ_ID AE-1 vs Stable AE-3 vs Stable AE-10 vs Stable
PRKCZ Z15108 −1.25 1.61 4.46
CGI-38 BC037798 −5.87 −2.86 −1.18
PRKCZ NM_001033581 −1.61 1.30 3.64
ABCA8 NM_007168 −1.27 1.68 6.69
SORBS1 AK022468 1.28 2.92 10.30
NEDD9 NM_006403 2.43 5.57 12.15
FRY NM_023037 −1.11 2.08 4.34
FOLR1 NM_016730 −4.20 −1.39 8.39

aData are from acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of the hospital admission. Comparisons are between AE-1 and AE-3 or between AE-3 and AE-10.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dynamic patterns of changes of gene expression of peripheral blood monocytes. Consistent decrease (A) or consistent increase (B), followed by a decrease (C), or a decrease followed by a recovery (D), in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) at day 1 (AE-1), day 3 (AE-3) and day 10 (AE-10) of hospital admission as compared with changes seen in patients with stable COPD.

Gene ontology analysis and pathway analysis

Within ten comparison pairs, up- or downregulated genes mainly involved in the biological process are shown in Figures S3 and S4 of Additional file 2, those in cellular components are shown in Figures S5 and S6 of Additional file 2 and those in molecular functions are shown in Figures S7 and S8 of Additional file 2. Additional file 5 lists gene numbers for ten comparison pairs with certain GO terms and different ranges of enrichment scores.

In the biological process, COPD-specific upregulated genes were involved mainly in peptide cross-linking, blood vessel development, biological adhesion or cell adhesion (Figure 4A). COPD-specific downregulated genes were involved mainly in T cell receptor signaling pathways, antigen receptor–mediated signaling pathways, immune response–activating cell surface receptor signaling pathways or steroid biosynthetic process (Figure 4B). AECOPD-specific genes upregulated in response to organic substance, response to wounding, multicellular organismal process or response to chemical stimulus are shown in Figure 4C. AECOPD-specific downregulated genes were involved mainly in the regulation of immune response and the immune system process or in the immune response and immune system process themselves (Figure 4D). In the cellular component, COPD-specific upregulated genes were involved mainly in the extracellular region, the extracellular matrix part, the proteinaceous extracellular matrix or the extracellular matrix (Figure 5A). COPD-specific downregulated genes were involved mainly in the major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) protein complex, microbody lumen, peroxisomal matrix or MHC II protein complex (Figure 5B). AECOPD-specific upregulated genes were involved mainly in the extracellular region part, the extracellular matrix, the extracellular space or the extracellular region (Figure 5C). AECOPD-specific downregulated genes were involved mainly in the cell periphery and the plasma membrane and were integral to the plasma membrane and intrinsic to the plasma membrane (Figure 5D). In molecular function, COPD-specific upregulated genes participated mainly in extracellular matrix structural constituent, platelet-derived growth factor binding, serine-type endopeptidase activity and protein binding (Figure 6A). COPD-specific downregulated genes were involved mainly in nucleoside kinase activity, MHC class II receptor activity, C-acyltransferase activity and ephrin receptor activity (Figure 6B). AECOPD-specific upregulated genes were involved mainly in protein binding, growth factor binding, calcium ion binding and polysaccharide binding (Figure 6C). AECOPD-specific downregulated genes were involved mainly in receptor activity, signaling receptor activity, molecular transducer activity and signal transducer activity (Figure 6D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Gene expression profile comparisons regarding the biological process. Graphs describe co–differentially upregulated genes (A) and downregulated genes (B) in the biological process of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including those with stable COPD and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), as compared to healthy control subjects. Also shown are co–differentially expressed upregulated genes (C) and downregulated genes (D) from patients with AECOPD, as compared to patients with stable COPD and healthy control subjects.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Gene expression profile comparisons regarding the cellular component. Graphs describe co–differentially upregulated genes (A) or downregulated genes (B) in the cellular component of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including stable COPD and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), as compared to healthy control subjects. Also shown are co–differentially expressed upregulated genes (C) or downregulated genes (D) from patients with AECOPD, as compared to both patients with stable COPD and healthy control subjects. MHC, Major histocompatibility complex.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Gene expression profile comparisons regarding molecular function. Graphs describe co–differentially upregulated genes (A) or downregulated genes (B) in the molecular function of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including stable COPD and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), as compared to healthy control subjects. Also shown are co–differentially expressed upregulated genes (C) or downregulated genes (D) from patients with AECOPD, as compared to both patients with stable COPD and healthy control subjects. MHC, Major histocompatibility complex.

COPD-specific upregulated genes also participated in extracellular matrix receptor interaction, protein digestion and absorption, focal adhesion and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt signaling pathway (Figure 7A). AECOPD-specific upregulated genes participated in Chagas disease, complement and coagulation cascades, pertussis and Staphylococcus aureus infection (Figure 7B). AECOPD-specific downregulated genes participated in antigen processing and presentation, natural killer cell–mediated cytotoxicity, graft-versus-host disease and thyroid cancer (Figure 7C).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Gene expression profile comparisons regarding signaling pathways. Graphs describe co–differentially upregulated genes (A) in different pathways of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including patients with stable COPD and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), as compared to healthy control subjects. Also shown are co–differentially expressed upregulated genes (B) or downregulated genes (C) from patients with AECOPD, as compared to patients with stable COPD and healthy control subjects. ECM, Extracellular matrix; MHC, Major histocompatibility complex; Pi3K, Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.

Discussion

PBMCs play a critical and important role in the occurrence of AECOPD, owing to less capacity for balancing the proinflammatory immune response caused by infection and for secreting adequate amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokines [22]. The fact that patients with COPD are more susceptible to acute exacerbation has been suggested to be associated with PBMC dysfunction and failure of adaptation to infection, stimuli or hypoxia, although there have been not yet studies on the phenotypes of PBMCs in AECOPD. For example, PBMCs from patients with COPD could not induce hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor, owing to a reduction in histone deacetylase 7 under hypoxic condition [23]. It was suggested that overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines (CXCL6 and interleukin 6 (IL-6)) from human PBMCs could be stimulated by the infection through activation of Toll-like receptor 4, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and nuclear factor κB [24], at least as partial mechanisms by which PBMCs may be involved in the occurrence of AECOPD. The present study provides initial evidence that dynamic alterations of PBMC genetic phenotypes occurred in patients with AECOPD after their hospital admission and during their hospital stay.

Gene expression profiles of PBMCs were investigated in patients with COPD, compared with healthy controls and correlated with lung function measurement [12]. Differential expression of 45 known genes was identified, of which 16 markers had significant correlation with quantitative traits and differential expression between cases and controls and 2 genes, RP9 and NAPE-PLD, were identified as decreased in patients with COPD, as compared to controls, in both lung tissue and blood. Gene expression profiles of PBMCs were recently identified and validated in smokers with and without COPD and corrected with clinical phenotypes such as sex, age, body mass index, family history, smoking status and pack-years of smoking [25]. Of them, 16 candidate genes were found to be associated with airflow obstruction and secondary clinical phenotypes, 12 with emphysema, 13 with gas trapping and 8 with distance walked. Both previous studies demonstrated the gene expression profiles of PBMCs from patients with stable COPD and addressed the potential significance of smoking. In the present study, we selected healthy control subjects and patients who were not current smokers and demonstrated gene expression profiles of PBMCs from patients with COPD, including stable COPD and AECOPD. We addressed COPD-specific gene expression profiles that should appear in both stable COPD and COPD exacerbation conditions and found COPD-specific 79 genes were upregulated and 23 genes down-regulated more than fivefold as compared with gene expression in controls. In the present study, we selected consistent up- or downregulated gene expression on days 1, 3 and 10 of AECOPD-specific as compared with gene expression in both healthy controls and patients with stable COPD, as AECOPD-specific gene expression profiles. We found that 58 AECOPD-specific genes were upregulated more than fivefold and 238 genes were downregulated more than twofold, as compared to both control subjects and patients with stable COPD.

Variation of gene expression profiles is dependent upon multiple uncontrollable factors, such as study population, age, history, genetic background and treatment. In addition, gene expression profiles vary between harvested sample types, such as sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, blood or lung tissues. For example, 102 genes were identified to distinguish between non- or mild emphysema and severe emphysema in lung tissue [15] and to distinguish 70 microRNAs and 2,667 mRNAs between smoking patients with or without COPD [26]. In the present study, we investigated gene expression profiles of PBMCs from control subjects, patients with stable COPD, and patients with AECOPD on day 1, day 3 and day 10 of hospital admission, and we found about 3,000 overexpressed genes and 2,000 downregulated genes in patients with stable COPD or AECOPD, as compared with control subjects. These findings indicate that those COPD-specific genes exist in the stable COPD condition and during acute exacerbations of COPD.

Of the COPD-specific genes we studied, CEACAM1, COL6A3, NOL3, COL1A2, MLPH, MUC1, P8, UNQ473, CLDN4, RNASE1, H19, DEFA1 and LOC653600 were upregulated more than tenfold, mainly related to nuclear proteins, collagens or molecular structure. We noted that transcription factor CP2 (TFCP2L1) and SCP2 were downregulated more than tenfold. In previous studies, these genes, including CEACAM1, TFCP2L1 and SCP2, were not found to be associated with COPD. The SCP2 gene is located within chromosome 1 and encodes the nonspecific lipid transfer protein SCP2, which is involved in organellar fatty acid metabolism [27,28] and the translocation of cytoplasmic free cholesterol to the mitochondria [29]. Our results indicate that PBMCs from patients with stable COPD or AECOPD had downregulated SCP2, which might point to severe metabolic disorder and thus that SCP2 downregulation might contribute to one of the common comorbidities of COPD [30]. TFCP2 is a member of a family of transcription factors that regulate genes involved in events from early development to terminal differentiation [31]. PBMCs with downregulated TFCP2 of patients with COPD might have less capacity of the transcriptional switch of globin gene promoters, many other cellular and viral gene promoters, or interaction with certain inflammatory response factors, although the exact mechanism and pathological role remain unclear.

AECOPD-specific gene expression profiles were selected by comparing them with both healthy control subjects and patients with stable COPD, including 647 upregulated genes and 238 downregulated genes (greater than twofold upregulation). Of them, FOS, IFI27, CYR61, CTGF, GPRC5A, FOSB, DCN and LOC387763 were upregulated more than tenfold and KIR2DS2, SH2D1B, CD8B, OR2W5, KSP37 and TCF7 were downregulated more than threefold.

We noticed that some genes, such as FOS, CYR61 and CTGF, were upregulated in PBMCs from patients with either stable COPD or AECOPD, consistent with the lung tissue gene expression profiles of patients with COPD or smokers, in whom the genes were expressed mainly in alveolar epithelial cells, airway epithelial cells and stromal and inflammatory cells [14]. Other genes, including GPRC5A, LOC387763 and KIR2DS2, were not found to be associated with AECOPD in previous publications. CTGF is a cysteine-rich peptide implicated in several biological processes, such as cell proliferation, survival and migration, and involved in pulmonary vascular remodeling and hypertension in COPD. It was evidenced by the experimental finding that CTGF short-hairpin RNA could significantly prevent CTGF and cyclin D1 expression, arrest cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase, suppress cell proliferation in smoking-exposed pulmonary smooth muscle cells and ameliorate pulmonary vascular remodeling [32]. Another study demonstrated that some inflammatory genes (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, CCL2 and CCL8) were upregulated, whereas some growth factor receptor genes (BMPR2, CTGF, FGF1, KDR and TEK) were downregulated in lung tissue samples from patients who were current smokers or had moderate COPD [33].

Downregulation of TCF7 was found in PBMCs of patients with COPD and current smoking and was correlated with some clinical phenotypes, such as emphysema, gas trapping and distance walked [25]. In the present study, we also found that TCF7 was downregulated in ex-smokers with COPD by about an absolute threefold compared with control subjects, and, in patients with AECOPD, TCF7 was downregulated by about an absolute tenfold compared with both control subjects and patients with stable COPD. These findings indicate that TCF7 not only is a COPD-specific gene but also is associated with the severity of the disease. TCF7 is a member of a family of HMG box containing factors associated with β-catenin to mediate Wnt signaling, controls the switch between cell self-renewal and differentiation and plays a role in B cell and T cell development. TCF7 was found to be the most downregulated transcription factor when CD34+ cells switched into CD34− cells through a coordinated regulation of the binding between TCF7 and the short isoforms of RUNX1 [34]. It is possible the downregulation of TCF7 and associated regulation may be one part of molecular mechanism of PBMC incapacity during AECOPD.

Dynamic alterations of gene expression profiles in patients with AECOPD were evaluated with dynamic DESS scores. ALAS2, EPB42 and CA1 were co–differentially expressed with a down–down type in patients with AECOPD. Among these three genes, the CA1 gene encodes a protein which is important in respiratory function, fluid secretion and maintenance of cellular acid–base homeostasis [35]. The genes with a down–up type included SELENBP1, MYH9 and an unnamed gene in chromosome 19, both of which are associated with psychotic disorders [36,37]. One limitation of the present study is the small sample size, which detracts from the generalizability of the results presented.

Conclusions

Dynamic alterations of PBMC gene expression profiles were initially investigated in patients with AECOPD, as compared with healthy control subjects or patients with stable COPD. A panel of genes, including eight that were upregulated and eight that were downregulated, were recommended as AECOPD-specific dynamic biomarkers. AECOPD-specific up- or downregulated genes in the biological process, cellular components or molecular function were defined and participated in complement and coagulation cascades, infection, antigen processing and presentation, natural killer cell–mediated cytotoxicity, and/or cancer-causing potential. The integration of dynamic bioinformatics with clinical phenotypes helped us to identify and validate AECOPD-specific biomarkers to help define the severity, duration and response of the disease to therapies.

Key messages

  • Circulating dynamic biomarkers were identified for the specificity and severity of AECOPD.

  • A panel of 16 genes were selected as AECOPD-specific biomarkers.

  • This is an initial study designed to examine gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and identify dynamic changes of AECOPD-specific biomarkers.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (project B115), Zhongshan Distinguished Professor Grant (to XDW), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (91230204, 81270099, 81320108001, 81270131, 81300010), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (12JC1402200, 12431900207, 11410708600), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Z2080988), the Zhejiang Provincial Science Technology Department Foundation (2010C14011) and the Ministry of Education, Academic Special Science and Research Foundation for PhD Education (20130071110043).

Abbreviations

AE-1

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 1

AE-3

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 3

AE-10

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on day 10

AECOPD

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ALAS2

Aminolevulinate, delta-, synthase 2

CA1

Carbonic anhydrase I

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CXCL8

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 8

DESS

Digital evaluation score system

EPB42

Erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.2

FEV1

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second

FVC

Forced vital capacity

GO

Gene Ontology

IL

Interleukin

MHC

Major histocompatibility complex

MYH9

Myosin, heavy polypeptide 9, non-muscle

PBMC

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

SCP2

Sterol carrier protein 2

SELENBP1

Selenium-binding protein 1

TCF7

Transcription factor 7

TFCP2L1

Transcription factor CP2-like 1

Additional files

Additional file 1: (44KB, doc)

DESS scores. This file lists Digital Evaluation Score System (DESS) scores of subjects from each group.

Additional file 2: (602.6KB, pdf)

Eight supplemental figures. Figure S1. A box plot showing distributions of log2 ratios among groups. They reflect our assessment of the quality of genetic data after the filtering and distribution of data sets. Figure S2. Hierarchical clustering shows distinguishable gene expression profiles and relationships between different groups. Figure S3. Co–differentially upregulated genes within 10 comparison pairs mainly involved in the biological process. Stable vs Con (A); AE-1 vs Con (B); AE-3 vs Con (C); AE-10 vs Con (D); AE-1 vs Stable (E); AE-3 vs Stable (F); AE-10 vs Stable (G); AE-3 vs AE-1 (H); AE-10 vs AE-1 (I); AE-10 vs AE-3 (J). Figure S4. Co–differentially downregulated genes within 10 comparison pairs mainly involved in the biological process. Figure S5. Co–differentially upregulated genes within 10 comparison pairs mainly involved in the cellular component. Figure S6. Co–differentially downregulated genes within 10 comparison pairs mainly involved in the cellular component. Figure S7. Co–differentially upregulated genes within 10 comparison pairs mainly involved in the molecular function. Figure S8. Co–differentially downregulated genes within 10 comparison pairs mainly involved in the molecular function.

Additional file 3: (104.1KB, pdf)

Differentially expressed genes. This file lists 10 comparison pairs with information of fold changes and regulation, normalized intensities or annotations.

Additional file 4: (263.6KB, pdf)

Co–differentially expressed genes. This file lists COPD-specific and AECOPD-specific genes, as well as dynamically changed genes, in patients with AECOPD.

Additional file 5: (422.5KB, xls)

Gene Ontology database. This file lists gene numbers for 10 comparison pairs with certain GO (Gene Ontology) terms and different enrichment score ranges.

Footnotes

Xiaodan Wu and Xiaoru Sun contributed equally.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

XW carried out the study, participated in the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. XRS participated in the data mining and analysis. CSC and CXB participated in the study design and data analysis and helped to revise the manuscript. XDW conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Xiaodan Wu, Email: physicianwuxd@126.com.

Xiaoru Sun, Email: sunxiaoru@outlook.com.

Chengshui Chen, Email: chenchengshui@gmail.com.

Chunxue Bai, Email: bai.chunxue@zs-hospital.sh.cn.

Xiangdong Wang, Email: xiangdong.wang@clintransmed.org.

References

  • 1.Celli BR, MacNee W, Agusti A, Anzueto A, Berg B, Buist AS, Calverley PMA, Chavannes N, Dillard T, Fahy B, Fein A, Heffner J, Lareau S, Meek P, Martinez F, McNicholas W, Muris J, Austegard E, Pauwels R, Rennard S, Rossi A, Siafakas N, Tiep B, Vestbo J, Wouters E, ZuWallack R. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:932–946. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00014304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pauwels RA, Rabe KF. Burden and clinical features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Lancet. 2004;364:613–620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16855-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fang X, Wang X, Bai C. COPD in China: the burden and importance of proper management. Chest. 2011;139:920–929. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Celli BR, Barnes PJ. Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:1224–1238. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00109906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Donaldson GC, Seemungal TA, Patel IS, Lloyd-Owen SJ, Wilkinson TM, Wedzicha JA. Longitudinal changes in the nature, severity and frequency of COPD exacerbations. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:931–936. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00038303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murtagh E, Heaney L, Gingles J, Shepherd R, Kee F, Patterson C, MacMahon J. Prevalence of obstructive lung disease in a general population sample: the NICECOPD study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:443–453. doi: 10.1007/s10654-005-1248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seemungal TA, Donaldson GC, Bhowmik A, Jeffries DJ, Wedzicha JA. Time course and recovery of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1608–1613. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9908022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, Elliott WM, Buzatu L, Cherniack RM, Rogers RM, Sciurba FC, Coxson HO, Paré PD. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2645–2653. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barnes PJ, Shapiro SD, Pauwels RA. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:672–688. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00040703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Melguizo C, Prados J, Luque R, Ortiz R, Rama AR, Caba O, Rodríguez-Serrano F, Álvarez PJ, Aránega A. Modulation of multidrug resistance gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of lung cancer patients and evaluation of their clinical significance. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:537–541. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pinto-Plata V, Toso J, Lee K, Park D, Bilello J, Mullerova H, De Souza MM, Vessey R, Celli B. Profiling serum biomarkers in patients with COPD: associations with clinical parameters. Thorax. 2007;62:595–601. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.064428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bhattacharya S, Tyagi S, Srisuma S, Demeo DL, Shapiro SD, Bueno R, Silverman EK, Reilly JJ, Mariani TJ. Peripheral blood gene expression profiles in COPD subjects. J Clin Bioinforma. 2011;1:12. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Golpon HA, Coldren CD, Zamora MR, Cosgrove GP, Moore MD, Tuder RM, Geraci MW, Voelkel NF. Emphysema lung tissue gene expression profiling. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;31:595–600. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0008OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ning W, Li CJ, Kaminski N, Feghali-Bostwick CA, Alber SM, Di YP, Otterbein SL, Song R, Hayashi S, Zhou Z, Pinsky DJ, Watkins SC, Pilewski JM, Sciurba FC, Peters DG, Hogg JC, Choi AM. Comprehensive gene expression profiles reveal pathways related to the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:14895–14900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401168101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Spira A, Beane J, Pinto-Plata V, Kadar A, Liu G, Shah V, Celli B, Brody JS. Gene expression profiling of human lung tissue from smokers with severe emphysema. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;31:601–610. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0273OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang X, Liotta L. Clinical bioinformatics: a new emerging science. J Clin Bioinforma. 2011;1:1. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang X. Role of clinical bioinformatics in the development of network-based Biomarkers. J Clin Bioinforma. 2011;1:28. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen H, Wang X. Significance of bioinformatics in research of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Bioinforma. 2011;1:35. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rodriguez-Roisin R. Toward a consensus definition for COPD exacerbations. Chest. 2000;117(5 Suppl 2):398S–401S. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.5_suppl_2.398S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen H, Song Z, Qian M, Bai C, Wang X. Selection of disease-specific biomarkers by integrating inflammatory mediators with clinical informatics in AECOPD patients: a preliminary study. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:1286–1297. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01416.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang X, Wu X: Expression analysis of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE60399] (published 14 August 2014).
  • 22.Rupp J, Kothe H, Mueller A, Maass M, Dalhoff K. Imbalanced secretion of IL-1β and IL-1RA in Chlamydia pneumoniae-infected mononuclear cells from COPD patients. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:274–279. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00007303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.To M, Yamamura S, Akashi K, Charron CE, Barnes PJ, Ito K. Defect of adaptation to hypoxia in patients with COPD due to reduction of histone deacetylase 7. Chest. 2012;141:1233–1242. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ngkelo A, Meja K, Yeadon M, Adcock I, Kirkham PA: LPS induced inflammatory responses in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells is mediated through NOX4 and Giα dependent PI-3kinase signalling.J Inflamm (Lond) 2012, 9:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Bahr TM, Hughes GJ, Armstrong M, Reisdorph R, Coldren CD, Edwards MG, Schnell C, Kedl R, LaFlamme DJ, Reisdorph N, Kechris KJ, Bowler RP. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013;49:316–323. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0230OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ezzie ME, Crawford M, Cho JH, Orellana R, Zhang S, Gelinas R, Batte K, Yu L, Nuovo G, Galas D, Diaz P, Wang K, Nana-Sinkam SP. Gene expression networks in COPD: microRNA and mRNA regulation. Thorax. 2012;67:122–131. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Szulakowski P, Crowther AJ, Jiménez LA, Donaldson K, Mayer R, Leonard TB, MacNee W, Drost EM. The effect of smoking on the transcriptional regulation of lung inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:41–50. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-725OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morris HR, Larsen BS, Billheimer JT: A mass spectrometric study of the structure of sterol carrier protein SCP2from rat liver.Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1988, 154:476–482. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Yanase T, Hara T, Sakai Y, Takayanagi R, Nawata H. Expression of sterol carrier protein 2 (SCP2) in human adrenocortical tissue. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996;134:501–507. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1340501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mannino DM, Thorn D, Swensen A, Holguin F. Prevalence and outcomes of diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:962–969. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swendeman SL, Spielholz C, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Sheffery M. Characterization of the genomic structure, chromosomal location, promoter, and development expression of the α-globin transcription factor CP2. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:11663–11671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang R, Xu YJ, Liu XS, Zeng DX, Xiang M. Knockdown of connective tissue growth factor by plasmid-based short hairpin RNA prevented pulmonary vascular remodeling in cigarette smoke-exposed rats. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2011;508:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Llinàs L, Peinado VI, Goñi JR, Rabinovich R, Pizarro S, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Barberà JA, Bastos R. Similar gene expression profiles in smokers and patients with moderate COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2011;24:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu JQ, Seay M, Schulz VP, Hariharan M, Tuck D, Lian J, Du J, Shi M, Ye Z, Gerstein M, Snyder MP, Weissman S. Tcf7 is an important regulator of the switch of self-renewal and differentiation in a multipotential hematopoietic cell line. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Davis MB, West LF, Barlow JH, Butterworth PH, Lloyd JC, Edwards YH. Regional localization of carbonic anhydrase genes CA1 and CA3 on human chromosome 8. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1987;13:173–178. doi: 10.1007/BF01534697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Amar S, Ovadia O, Maier W, Ebstein R, Belmaker RH, Mishmar D, Agam G. Copy number variation of the SELENBP1 gene in schizophrenia. Behav Brain Funct. 2010;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-6-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kanazawa T, Chana G, Glatt SJ, Mizuno H, Masliah E, Yoneda H, Tsuang MT, Everall IP. The utility of SELENBP1 gene expression as a biomarker for major psychotic disorders: replication in schizophrenia and extension to bipolar disorder with psychosis. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008;147B:686–689. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES