Abstract
AIM: To study the incidence of ulcerative colitis UC in the prefecture of Trikala, Central Greece.
METHODS: A prospective and population based epidemiological study of UC from 1990 to the end of 1994 was conducted. Trikala is a semirural prefecture of Central Greece with a population of 138946 (census 1991). Three gastroenterologists (one hospital based, two private doctors) of the prefecture participated in this study.
RESULTS: During the study period, 66 new histologically verified cases of UC were recorded. The mean annual incidence of the disease in 1990-1994 was 11.2 per 105 inhabitants (95%CI: 8.7-14.3). There was no difference between men and women (annual incidence: 10.5 and 12.0 per 105 inhabitants respectively), either among urban, semirural or rural populations (annual incidence: 11.7, 17.1 and 9.9 per 105 inhabitants respectively). The majority (56%) of the patients never smoked and a quarter were ex-smokers. About a half of all cases had proctitis.
CONCLUSION: UC is common in Central Greece and its incidence is similar to that in North-Western European countries.
Keywords: Ulcerative colitis, Histology
INTRODUCTION
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. During recent years, many epidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of UC varies within different geographic areas. Northern developed countries in Europe, especially United Kingdom and Scandinavia, have a higher rate than in southern countries[1-3]. This geographic variation suggests the hypothesis that some environmental factor(s) and life style may be responsible for the etiology of the disease[3]. Two epidemiological studies showed a different incidence of UC in Greece[4,5].
The aim of our study was to obtain an estimation of the incidence of the disease in Central Greece and to compare our data with those of other parts of Greece and other European countries. The present prospective epidemiological study concerned the prefecture of Trikala, a semirural area of Central Greece.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population and area
Trikala is one of the four prefectures of Thessalia county, which is a semirural area of Central Greece. The total population, according to the 1991 census (National Statistic Organisation) is 138946 residents, but the study population was 117395, as UC is uncommon before the age of 10 years[6]. The study population was stable and racially homogenous and had a wide range of age, social status, occupation and level of education. Table 1 shows the age distribution of study population by sex according to the 1991 census. According to current epidemiologic guidelines, it could be argued that the size of the study population was small. However, as the population was homogenous, well balanced and dispersed over a small geographical area, the results could likely provide accurate baseline estimates of the incidence of UC for the study area.
Table 1.
Age (yr) group | Males | Females | Total |
10-19 | 11036 | 9938 | 20974 |
20-29 | 7997 | 7930 | 15927 |
30-39 | 9097 | 8521 | 17618 |
40-49 | 9141 | 8375 | 17516 |
50-59 | 9896 | 10030 | 19926 |
60-69 | 7477 | 8259 | 15736 |
>70 | 4289 | 5409 | 9698 |
Total | 58933 | 58462 | 117395 |
The patients were separated according to their residence into three groups. The first group included residents of urban regions, the second of semi-rural and the last one of rural. Any patient who resided within cities with a population over 10000 inhabitants was regarded as belonging to an urban population, in large villages (2000-9999 inhabitants) as a semirural population and in the country as a rural population (small villages, below 1 999 inhabitants). The population distribution is given in Table 2.
Table 2.
Males | Females | Total | |
Urban | 20378 | 20700 | 41078 |
Semi-rural | 5776 | 5944 | 11720 |
Rural | 32779 | 31818 | 64597 |
Case ascertainment
The health care system is of mixed type, including a National Health Service and a private sector. The National Health Service consists of three health centers and a General Hospital. There is only one gastroenterology department in the General Hospital, with one specialist. In the private sector there are no hospitals and two gastroenterologists working in the area. There is no established general health information system yet and hence no record linkage was possible. All three gastroenterologists of the prefecture participated in this study, which started on January 1 1990. Patients who had been residents in the defined study area at the time of diagnosis were included. The study group held regular meetings during the study period to review the data.
All patients included in the study underwent a complete laboratory examination including several stool examinations for parasites, stool cultures and appropriate serologic examinations for exclusion of gastrointestinal infections. Intestinal ischaemia, drug-induced enteritis and colitis, in addition to other known causes of intestinal inflammation were excluded as far as possible. All patients underwent a complete colonoscopic examination with biopsies from various parts of the large bowel. All histological findings were discussed by a panel of pathologists interested in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Standard criteria were taken into account to establish the final diagnosis[7].
Statistical methods
Annual and average UC incidences were calculated as the total number of patients first diagnosed as having UC per 105 inhabitants in the study area. For the aggregated data (1990-1994), age-standardized incidences were calculated using standard European population. Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the exact binomial variance.
RESULTS
During the five-year period (1 January 1990-31 December 1994), 66 new cases of definite UC were seen in the area of Trikala (31 males, 35 females). Table 3 shows the incidence of UC by the year of diagnosis and sex. The mean annual incidence of UC over the five years was 11.2/105 inhabitants per year (95%CI: 8.7-14.3). The annual incidence of 5.1/105 in 1990 increased to 17.9/105 in 1994. There were fluctuations in the incidence rates with the highest of 18.7/105 in males in 1994 and the lowest of 5.1/105 in men and women in 1990.
Table 3.
Year |
Males |
Females |
Total |
|||
n | Incidence per 105 | n | Incidence per 105 | n | Incidence per 105 | |
1990 | 3 | 5.1 (1.1-14.9) | 3 | 5.1 (1.1-15.0) | 5.1 (1.9-11.1) | |
1991 | 5 | 8.5 (2.8-19.8) | 5 | 8.6 (2.8-20.0) | 6 | 8.5 (4.1-15.7) |
1992 | 8 | 13.6 (5.9-26.8) | 8 | 13.7 (5.9-27.0) | 10 | 13.6 (7.8-22.1) |
1993 | 4 | 6.8 (1.9-17.4) | 9 | 15.4 (7.0-29.2) | 16 | 11.1 (5.9-18.9) |
1994 | 11 | 18.7 (9.3-33.4) | 10 | 17.1 (8.2-31.5) | 13 | 17.9 (11.1-27.3) |
Apr-90 | 31 | 10.5 (7.2-14.9) | 35 | 12.0 (8.3-16.7) | 21 | 11.2 (8.7-14.3) |
ASI | 9.3 (4.2-17.1) | 11.4 (5.6-19.8) | 66 | 10.2 (5.0-18.6) |
The male/female ratio was 1:0.9. The 95%CI in Table 3 showed the difference in incidence rates between males and females. Table 4 shows the age distribution at the time of diagnosis for all the patients as well as age specific incidence rates. The highest age specific incidence rate was 22.7/105 inhabitants for patients between 30-39 years of age.
Table 4.
Age (yr)groups |
Males |
Females |
Total |
|||
n | Incidence per 105 | n | Incidence per 105 | n | Incidence per 105 | |
10-19 | 6 | 10.9 (4.0-23.7) | 2 | 4.0 (0.5-14.5) | 8 | 7.6 (3.3-15.0) |
20-29 | 8 | 20.0 (8.6-39.4) | 7 | 17.7 (7.1-36.4) | 15 | 18.8 (10.5-31.1) |
30-39 | 8 | 17.6 (7.6-34.7) | 12 | 28.2 (14.6-49.2) | 20 | 22.7 (13.9-35.1) |
8 | 40-49 | 36.6 (1.4-19.2) | 10 | 23.9 (11.5-43.9) | 13 | 14.8 (7.9-25.4) |
50-59 | 1 | 2.0 (0.05-11.3) | 3 | 6.0 (1.2-17.5) | 4 | 4.0 (1.1-10.3) |
60-69 | 4 | 10.7 (2.9-27.4) | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5.1 (1.4-13.0) |
>70 | 1 | 4.7 (0.1-26.0) | 1 | 3.7 (0.09-20.6) | 2 | 4.1 (0.5-14.9) |
Total | 31 | 35 | 66 |
Looking at the incidence of UC by sex and place of residence (Table 5), the urban population had an incidence of 11.7/105, the semi-rural 17.1/105 and the rural 9.9/105. The average annual incidence of females living in rural area was the lowest (8.8/105) among women, whereas males living in urban area had the lowest average annual incidence among men (6.9/105).
Table 5.
Place of residence |
Males |
Females |
Total |
|||
n | Incidence per 105 | n | Incidence per 105 | n | Incidence per 105 | |
Urban | 7 | 6.9 (2.8-14.2) | 17 | 16.4 (9.6-26.3) | 24 | 11.7 (7.4-17.4) |
Semi-rural | 6 | 20.8 (7.6-45.2) | 4 | 13.5 (3.7-34.5) | 10 | 17.1 (8.2-31.4) |
Rural | 18 | 11.0 (6.5-17.4) | 14 | 8.8 (4.8-14.8) | 32 | 9.9 (6.8-14.0) |
Total | 31 | 35 | 66 |
In relation to smoking, 13 of the 66 patients (19.7%) smoked, 16 (24.3%) were ex-smokers and 37 (56%) non-smokers.
As far as family history of IBD was concerned, in 3 of the 66 patients (4.5%) either UC or Crohn’s disease was present in a first degree relative.
In relation to clinical features, 5 patients (7.5%) had pancolitis, 29 (44%) proctosigmoiditis and 32 (48.5%) proctitis. During the follow up period, in 36 of the patients (54.5%) at least one relapse per year was observed. Hospitalization was required by 8 patients (12.1%) at different times after the day of diagnosis.
DISCUSSION
Epidemiological studies have found that the incidence of UC varies within geographic areas and within populations of different race.
According to our findings, a UC incidence of 11.2/105 (95%CI: 8.7-14.3) was higher than that reported from other southern European countries[8,9] and within the range of findings in northern Europe[10-12]. In Greece, a retrospective study from north-west Greece [4] showed an incidence of 4.0/105 (95%CI: 3.0-5.0) and a prospective study from Crete[5] showed an incidence of 8.9/105 (95%CI: 7.2-10.4).
The incidence of UC in Trikala prefecture showed an increase during the five years of the study, from 5.1/105 in 1990 to 17.9/105 in 1994. This increase may be attributed to informing programs about the disease, raising the likelihood of people being referred to specialists. Moreover, the application of modern investigative techniques in diagnostic evaluation is likely to explain the increase, although a true raise of the incidence can not be excluded.
The incidence regarding sex was slightly higher for females (12.0/105) compared to males (10.5/105). This finding was remarkable especially in the incidence of 1993, without a special reason to explain it. Another two Greek studies[4,5] did not show this difference. The age-specific incidences, either in males or in females, showed a peak in the age group of 30-39 years. This peak incidence has also been observed by others [4,5,13].
The incidence between urban and rural population was similar, whereas the incidence in semi-rural populations was slightly increased. The average incidence among women living in rural areas (8.8/105) was lower than that among women living in urban areas (16.4/105) and also lower than that among men living in rural areas (11.0/105). This finding has been reported in the study of Crete[5], but it is unclear if it shows true incidence differences or reflects difficulties in access to hospital care and the social shyness of women living in Greek villages.
Regarding smoking, our findings are similar to those reported by others[14,15]. UC was more common between non-smokers and ex-smokers compared with smokers.
According to the anatomical distribution of UC, pancolitis showed a slightly lower proportion compared with other studies[4,5,10,16], but the proportion for proctitis was similar.
Although epidemiological studies presented special problems, we believe that our results represent the true incidence of UC in the prefecture of Trikala. The population of Trikala is relatively stable and with only three specialists and one hospital, it was easy to carry out the study.
In conclusion, the incidence of UC in Central Greece is comparable to that reported from other European countries. The increasing incidence of UC during the five years of the study may be explained by the tendency in Greece to adopt a life-style similar to other European countries. This increase may suggest that environmental determinants, diets and life-styles are probably related to UC.
References
- 1.Mayberry JF, Probest CSJ, Jayanthi V, Shivananda S. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: A European prospective. In: Anagnostides AA, Hodgson HJF, Kirsten JB, eds , editors. Inflammatory Bowel Disease. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. pp. 163–178. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mendeloff A. The epidemiology of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. In: Jarnerot G, Lennard-Jones J, Truevole S, eds , editors. Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Malmo: Corona/Astra; 1992. pp. 15–33. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sandler RS. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. In: Targan SR, Shanahan F, eds , editors. Inflammatory Bowel Disease from Bench to Bedside. Baltimore: Williams Wilkins; 1994. pp. 5–30. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsianos EV, Masalas CN, Merkouropoulos M, Dalekos GN, Logan RF. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in north west Greece: rarity of Crohn's disease in an area where ulcerative colitis is common. Gut. 1994;35:369–372. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.3.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Manousos ON, Giannadaki E, Mouzas IA, Tzardi M, Koutroubakis I, Skordilis P, Vassilakis S, Kouroumalis E, Vlachonikolis IG. Ulcerative colitis is as common in Crete as in northern Europe: a 5-year prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8:893–898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rhodes JM, Ryder SD, Tsai HH. Clinical Features of Ulcerative Colitis. In: Misiewicz JJ, Pounder RE & Venables CW, eds , editors. Diseases of the Gut and Pancreas. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994. pp. 677–697. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lennard-Jones JE. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1989;170:2–6; discussion 16-19. doi: 10.3109/00365528909091339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tragnone A, Hanau C, Bazzocchi G, Lanfranchi GA. Epidemiological characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease in Bologna, Italy--incidence and risk factors. Digestion. 1993;54:183–188. doi: 10.1159/000201036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vucelić B, Korać B, Sentić M, Milicić D, Hadzić N, Juresa V, Bozikov J, Rotkvić I, Buljevac M, Kovacević I. Ulcerative colitis in Zagreb, Yugoslavia: incidence and prevalence 1980-1989. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20:1043–1047. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.4.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kildebo S, Nordgaard K, Aronsen O, Breckan R, Burhol PG, Jorde R. The incidence of ulcerative colitis in Northern Norway from 1983 to 1986. The Northern Norwegian Gastroenterology Society. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;25:890–896. doi: 10.3109/00365529008997609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a large, population-based study in Sweden. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:350–358. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90202-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sinclair TS, Brunt PW, Mowat NA. Nonspecific proctocolitis in northeastern Scotland: a community study. Gastroenterology. 1983;85:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Calkins BM, Mendeloff AI. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Epidemiol Rev. 1986;8:60–91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harries AD, Baird A, Rhodes J. Non-smoking: a feature of ulcerative colitis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284:706. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6317.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Franceschi S, Panza E, La Vecchia C, Parazzini F, Decarli A, Bianchi Porro G. Nonspecific inflammatory bowel disease and smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125:445–452. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stonnington CM, Phillips SF, Melton LJ, Zinsmeister AR. Chronic ulcerative colitis: incidence and prevalence in a community. Gut. 1987;28:402–409. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.4.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]