Modulation of liver oxidant-antioxidant system by ischemic preconditioning during ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

Abstract

AIM: To investigate effects of ischemic pre-conditioning on the liver endogenous oxidant-antioxidant system during ischemia/reperfusion injury.

METHODS: Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into sham-operated (Sham), ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), ischemic pre-conditioning plus ischemia/reperfusion (IPC) groups. Serum ALT, AST and hyaluronic acid levels were assayed and pathologic alterations observed. Liver malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, endogenous antioxidant enzymes, superoxidase dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), gultathionine peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities, neutrophils accumulation marker, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities were measured respectively.

RESULTS: Compared with I/R group, sinusoidal endothelial cells as well as hepatocytes damages, as assessed biochemically and histochemically, were improved significantly in IPC group; neutrophils infiltration was also markedly reduced. In IPC group, liver peroxidation, as measured by MDA contents, was significantly decreased when compared with I/R group; endogenous antioxidant enzymes, SOD, CAT and GSH-Px activities were markedly higher than that in I/R group.

CONCLUSION: Ischemic pre-conditioning exerts protective effects on both hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes during liver I/R injury. Its mechanisms may involve dimunition of neutrophils infiltration and modulation of the imbalance of endogenous oxidant-antioxidant system in the organism.

INTRODUCTION

Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following liver surgery and transplantation. Ischemic pre-conditioning (IPC) refers to brief episodes of ischemia followed by prolonged ischemia and reperfusion and has been shown to protect organs against ischemia/reperfusion injury[1]. Although, it was studied extensively in a variety of organs, including skeletal muscle, brain, spinal cord, kidney, intestine, heart and liver, the mechanisms of its protective effects remain unknown.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of ischemia/reperfusion injury[2]. Administration of antioxidants such as glutathione, quercetin, could afford protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury[3,4]. It has been shown that ischemic pre-conditioning can prevent the formation of ROS after I/R, thus exerting protection to the liver[5,6]. To control the detrimental effects of ROS, organisms have developed a variety of antioxidant defense systems, especially the endogenous antioxidant enzymes system including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx). However, there is little information available revealing the effects of ischemic pre-conditioning on those antioxidant enzymes. In this study, we investigated the effects of ischemic pre-conditioning on the liver endogenous oxidant-antioxidant system during ischemia/reperfusion injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal model

Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 200-250 g, were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Wuhan University and kept under specific pathogen free conditions. The rats were randomly divided into 3 groups of 8 rats each: sham-operated (Sham) group, ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) group, ischemic preconditioning plus ischemia/reperfusion (IPC) group. Liver I/R injury was induced as follows. Rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally). A midline laparotomy was performed. An atraumatic clip was used to interrupt blood supply to the left lateral and median lobes of the liver. After 90 min of partial hepatic ischemia, the clip was removed to initiate hepatic reperfusion. Sham group rats underwent the same protocol without vascular occlusion. But in IPC group rats, before the procedure of ischemia/reperfusion, the left lateral and median lobes of the liver were subjected to 10 min ischemia followed by 10 min reperfusion. Three hours after liver reperfusion, all rats were sacrificed and blood and liver samples were collected for analysis.

Serum liver function and hyaluronic acid assay

Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were measured using commercial kits by a Hitachi Automatic Biochemical Analyzer. Determination of serum hyaluronic acid was performed by radioimmunology according to the assay kit’s instructions (Shanghai Navy Medical Institute, China).

Detection of liver malondialdehyde levels and antioxidant enzymes activities

Rat livers were homogenized in 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffer. The homogenates were centrifuged at 3500 r/min for 30 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was taken for the assays of MDA and antioxidant enzymes activities (all assay kits purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Co. Ltd, China).

MDA was assayed by the measurement of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) levels at 532 nm. Results were expressed as nmol/mg protein.

SOD activity was measured through the inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction by O₂^- generated by the xanthine/xanthine oxidase system. One SOD activity unit was defined as the enzyme amount causing 50% inhibition in 1 mL reaction solution per milligram tissue protein and the result expressed as U/mg protein.

CAT activity was determined by measuring the intensity of a yellow complex formed by molybdate and H₂O₂ at 405 nm, after ammonium molybdate was added to terminate the H₂O₂ degradation reaction catalyzed by CAT. An enzyme activity unit was defined as the degradation of 1 μmol H₂O₂ per sec per mg tissue protein and the enzyme activity expressed as U/mg protein.

GSH-Px activity was detected by measuring the reduction of glutathione (GSH) per min on the base of its catalysis. GSH reacts with 5,5’dithiobis-p-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), and produces yellow colored compounds which are detected at 412 nm and represents the reduction of GSH. One unit of the enzyme activity was defined as a decrease of 1 μmol/L GSH per min for 1 mg tissue protein after the decrease of GSH of the nonenzymatic reaction is subtracted and the result expressed as U/mg protein.

Detailed procedures for the above measurements were performed according to the kits’ protocol. The protein content was determined by the technique of Lowry et al[7], using bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Myeloperoxidase assay

Liver samples were weighed and homogenized in a solution prepared from the assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Co. Ltd, China), and homogenates of 5% were obtained and used for MPO assay. MPO can catalyze the redox reaction of H₂O₂ and 3, 3, 5, 5-tetramethylbenzidine and produce yellow- colored compounds, through whose absorbance at 460 nm MPO activity was calculated and expressed as U/g wet tissue. One unit of MPO activity was defined as the quantity of enzyme that degraded 1 μmoL H₂O₂ at 37 °C per g wet tissue.

Pathological studies

Liver specimens, with approximate size 1.0 cm×0.5 cm×0.3 cm, were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 12-24 h, dehydrated gradually in a graded series of ethanol, clarified in xylene and embedded in paraffin wax. Paraffin wax sections of 5 μm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for pathologic examination.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean±SD. The statistical significance of differences between groups were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The P values less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Serum ALT, AST and HA levels (Table 1)

Table 1.

Effects of IPC on serum ALT, AST, and HA levels during hepatic I/R injury.

Groups	ALT (U/L)	AST (U/L)	HA (mg/L)
Sham	43.65±4.15	146.90±10.51	41.01±9.02
I/R	250.51±9.96b	308.24±12.61b	397.80±22.92b
IPC	197.13±13.82d	211.71±10.67d	197.80±12.68d

^bP <0.01 vs Sham group;

^dP <0.01 vs I/R group.

After 90 min of hepatic ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion, serum ALT and AST levels were significantly increased in I/R group, as compared with Sham group (P<0.01). However, in IPC group, serum ALT and AST levels were markedly reduced when compared with I/R group (P<0.01).

Liver MDA levels and antioxidant enzymes activities (Table 2)

Table 2.

Effects of IPC on the liver MDA levels as well as the antioxidant enzymes activities during hepatic I/R injury.

Groups	MDA (nmol/mg protein)	SOD (U/mg protein)	CAT (U/mg protein)	GSH-Px (U/mg protein)
Sham	3.46±0.59	234.42±12.27	18.29±0.89	247.67±23.89
I/R	17.56±2.16b	128.08±9.37b	8.09±0.71b	106.40±15.45b
IPC	10.52±1.62d	179.41±9.19d	13.08±0.70d	179.50±24.76d

^bP<0.01 vs Sham group;

^dP <0.01 vs I/R group.

Liver levels of MDA, a marker of oxidative stress[8], were significantly higher in I/R group compared with Sham group (P<0.01). However, the MDA levels in IPC group were markedly decreased as compared with I/R group (P<0.01).

Activities of liver antioxidant enzymes, SOD, CAT and GSH-Px were presented in Table 2. In I/R group, all these enzymes activities were significantly lower compared with Sham group (P<0.01). But in IPC group, the antioxidant enzymes activities were markedly higher when compared with I/R group (P<0.01).

Liver MPO activities (Figure 1)

Figure 1.

Effects of IPC on the liver MPO activities during hepatic I/R injury.

Neutrophil deposition at 3 h of reperfusion in the ischemic lobes, as analyzed by MPO activities[9], increased significantly in I/R group compared with Sham group (P<0.01). In contrast, IPC group had markedly reduced MPO activities as compared with I/R group (P<0.01).

Pathologic changes

The ischemic lobes in I/R group revealed disorderly liver sinusoids, enlarged and congested with many red blood- cells, their lining endothelial cells degenerated, necrotized and sloughed off, exposing parenchymal cells immediately to blood, as well as multiple and extensive ballooning/hepatocellular necrosis and massive infiltration of neutriphils (Figure 2). However, IPC group showed good preservation of lobular architecture, with less sinusoidal lining endothelial cells swelled, necrotized and sloughed off and few hepatocellular necrosis/ballooning and neutrophils infiltration as well (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Liver tissue from I/R group showed disorderly liver sinusoids enlarged and congested with many red blood cells, lining endothelial cells necrotized and sloughed off, and multiple hepatocellular necrosis and massive infiltration of neutriphils as well. HE×200.

Figure 3.

Liver tissue from IPC group showed orderly sinusoids with less lining endothelial cells necrotized and sloughed off, and few hepatocellular degeneration and necrosis and neutrophils infiltration. HE×200.

DISCUSSION

Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion can lead to liver cells (i.e., parenchymal and sinusoidal cells) damage and dysfunction. Ischemic pre-conditioning is extensively documented to reduce I/R injury in a variety of organs including liver[10-12]. In our study, we demonstrated that IPC could attenuate hepatic I/R injury, indicated by reduced serum ALT and AST levels and improved tissue pathologic alteration as compared with I/R group. Neutrophils contribute to the hepatic I/R injury[13]. Intravital video microscopy observed that ischemic pre-conditioning could attenuate the recruitment of leukocytes in terminal hepatic venules after liver I/R[14]. Our study also showed that IPC significantly blunted the increase of liver MPO contents, a marker of neutrophils accumulation, compared with I/R group. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is produced mainly by fibroblast and other specialized connective tissue cells, and removed from circulation by specific receptors present in sinusoidal cells (SEC) of the liver. HA uptake reflects the damage of SEC and serum HA levels were used as a noninvasive indicator of SEC damage[15,16]. Our experiment showed that the increase of serum HA levels was markedly prevented in IPC group as compared with I/R group and sinusoidal endothelial pathological alteration also significantly improved, suggesting that IPC was not limited to parenchymal cells but ameliorated sinusoidal cells dysfunction during I/R injury.

ROS is involved in the I/R injury. Liver contents of MDA, the product of lipid peroxidation, were significantly increased following I/R compared with Sham group. In IPC group, the MDA contents were markedly lowered compared with I/R group. The results are in agreement with the reports of Cavalieri et al[5]. Peralta et al[6], showed that IPC could block the xanthine oxidase pathway of ROS generation, thus providing protection against liver I/R injury. Diminishing ROS production contributes to the mechanism of IPC injury-preventive effects. To reduce the detrimental effects of ROS, besides diminishing its production, organisms have developed their own antioxidant mechanisms including low-molecular-weight antioxidant molecules, i.e., glutathiones, melatonin and various antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, CAT, GPx and glutathione reductase. These enzymes activities are higher in the liver than in other tissues. SOD catalyses the dismutation of the superoxide anion (O₂^-) into H₂O₂; H₂O₂ can be transformed into H₂O and O₂ by CAT; GSH-Px is a selenoprotein, which reduces lipidic or nonlipidic hydroperoxides as well as H₂O₂ while oxidizing GSH[17]. In our study, we found that I/R impaired these enzymes activities, as indicated by the markedly lower activities compared with Sham group. But in IPC group, the decrease of enzymes activities was significantly suppressed during I/R injury. These data indicate that IPC may confer protection to the liver during I/R injury in part by improving activities of the endogenous antioxidant enzymes, which scavenge ROS and reduce their effects. However, the mechanism by which it stimulates these antioxidant enzymes is unknown. Many evidences have shown that the expressions of all these enzymes genes are directly or indirectly regulated by redox-sensitive transcription factors, such as NF-κB and AP-1[18,19]. Hepatic IPC is associated with activation of NF-kappaB[20], which may account for its stimulation of the endogenous antioxidant enzymes.

In summary, the present study showed that IPC could protect sinusoidal endothelial cells as well as hepatocytes during liver I/R injury and its mechanism is partly involved in modulating the imbalance of endogenous oxidant-antioxidant system in the organism. This may suggest a potential role for antioxidant enzymes in the management of I/R injury, but further studies are needed for their injury-preventive effects.