Summary
Acetylcholine critically influences hippocampal-dependent learning. Cholinergic fibers innervate hippocampal neuron axons, dendrites, and somata. The effects of acetylcholine on axonal information processing, though, remain unknown. By stimulating cholinergic fibers and making electrophysiological recordings from hippocampal dentate gyrus granule cells, we show that synaptically released acetylcholine preferentially lowered the action potential threshold, enhancing intrinsic excitability and synaptic potential-spike coupling. These effects persisted for at least 30 min after the stimulation paradigm and were due to muscarinic receptor activation. This caused sustained elevation of axonal intracellular Ca2+ via T-type Ca2+ channels, as indicated by two-photon imaging. The enhanced Ca2+ levels inhibited an axonal KV7/M current, decreasing the spike threshold. In support, immunohistochemistry revealed muscarinic M1 receptor, CaV3.2, and KV7.2/7.3 subunit localization in granule cell axons. Since alterations in axonal signaling affect neuronal firing patterns and neurotransmitter release, this is an unreported cellular mechanism by which acetylcholine might, at least partly, enhance cognitive processing.
Highlights
-
•
Cholinergic fiber stimulation caused a persistent reduction in the spike threshold
-
•
Post-synaptic muscarinic receptor activation enhanced axonal CaV3.2 channel activity
-
•
The sustained Ca2+ entry inhibited axonal KV7 channels, lowering the spike threshold
-
•
The lower spike threshold increased the propensity for action potential generation
Acetylcholine is thought to influence cognitive processing by affecting somato-dendritic excitability and neurotransmitter release. Here, Martinello et al. show that endogenous acetylcholine acts on axonal muscarinic receptors to significantly influence action potential initiation and information processing in hippocampal granule cells.
Introduction
Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator in the CNS that has a salient role in cognition (Hasselmo and Sarter, 2011; Picciotto et al., 2012). Cholinergic afferents widely innervate the CNS. The medial septum projections to the hippocampus have been associated with cognitive processing. These are likely to be instrumental in mediating hippocampal neural network activity, such as theta-rhythm oscillations that are necessary for memory acquisition (Buzsáki, 2002). Moreover, altered acetylcholine receptor activity and cholinergic fiber lesions lower the threshold for hippocampal long-term potentiation, the cellular correlate of learning and memory (Hasselmo and Sarter, 2011; Picciotto et al., 2012). Hence, ascertaining how acetylcholine affects hippocampal neuronal excitability is vital for understanding cognitive processing.
The hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) plays a fundamental role in processes such as memory encoding and storage (Acsády and Káli, 2007; Pelkey and McBain, 2008). Granule cells, the DG principal neurons, receive the primary input to the hippocampus from the cortex, which is relayed to hippocampal CA3 neurons via their axons (mossy fibers) (Acsády and Káli, 2007; Pelkey and McBain, 2008). The DG contains many inhibitory neurons (Coulter and Carlson, 2007). This, coupled with the unique granule cell somato-dendritic membrane properties (Krueppel et al., 2011; Lübke et al., 1998; Pernía-Andrade and Jonas, 2014), results in them having a very low mean action potential firing frequency rate in vivo (Henze et al., 2002; Pernía-Andrade and Jonas, 2014). Thus, only granule cells that receive a strong glutamatergic drive will participate in information transfer to the CA3 region (Acsády and Káli, 2007). A high density of cholinergic fibers, though, also innervates the DG (Aznavour et al., 2005). Interestingly, granule cells display action potential bursts during exploration-associated theta rhythms (Skaggs et al., 1996) when cholinergic neurons discharge maximally (Jones, 2004). However, relatively little is known about how cholinergic activity impacts DG cell function (Hasselmo and Sarter, 2011; Picciotto et al., 2012).
The cellular mechanisms by which acetylcholine exerts its effects are complex and are likely to depend on the timing of the release of acetylcholine as well as the state of neurons (Picciotto et al., 2012). Cholinergic receptor modulation of hippocampal pyramidal cell somato-dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity has been extensively explored (Hasselmo and Sarter, 2011; Picciotto et al., 2012). Cholinergic fibers, however, innervate hippocampal cell axons too (Aznavour et al., 2005). The effects of acetylcholine on axonal signal processing remain to be elucidated. Understanding this is crucial as altered axonal information processing will impact neural firing patterns and synaptic release and, thereby, neural network excitability (Bean, 2007; Debanne et al., 2011; Kole and Stuart, 2012).
Here, we show that cholinergic fiber stimulation results in a persistent reduction of the granule cell action potential threshold and increased propensity to elicit action potentials. These effects are due to muscarinic receptor-induced sustained axonal Ca2+ influx via T-type Ca2+ channels, which then causes an enduring decrease in axonal KV7 K+ channel function, reducing the spike threshold. Hence, our results show that cholinergic afferent discharge primes granule cell axons to more readily elicit action potentials. This represents a unique means by which cholinergic afferent input enhances neuronal information processing and possibly influences memory formation.
Results
Persistent Spike Threshold Reduction and Enhanced Excitability by Synaptically Released Acetylcholine
To investigate how endogenous acetylcholine affects granule cell intrinsic activity, we made patch-clamp recordings from mature cells in brain slices before and after extracellular stimulation of afferents in the stratum moleculare (Figure 1A). These cells had input resistances (RN) of 297.94 ± 23.9 MΩ (n = 117) and complex dendritic trees (Figure 1A) as revealed by post hoc morphological analysis. Experiments were performed in the presence of glutamatergic and GABAergic ionotropic and metabotropic receptor inhibitors, unless otherwise stated.
Cholinergic fibers are most active during paradoxical sleep in vivo, firing in high-frequency bursts (average frequency of 16–29 spikes/s) (Brazhnik and Fox, 1999; Lee et al., 2005). We stimulated cholinergic fibers eight to ten times at an intra-burst frequency of 40 Hz and inter-burst interval of 125 ms (∼3 Hz; near theta frequency; average frequency = 27.8 Hz; Figure 1A). The stimulus strength was adjusted to yield single slow cholinergic synaptic potentials with amplitudes of 0.56 ± 0.1 mV (n = 15) and summation ratios of 2.49 ± 0.4 (n = 15; Figure 1A). This “high-frequency” (HF) stimulation paradigm was repeated ten times at 0.1 Hz. HF stimulation significantly lowered the action potential (spike) threshold, without affecting other intrinsic membrane properties (Figure 1B, Tables S1 and S2). This did not recover for up to 30 min after the stimulation. Consequently, granule cells generated more action potentials with depolarization (Figure 1B). Similar results were also obtained if the superfusate contained 1.3 mM Ca2+ concentrations (spike threshold decrease immediately and 30 min post-stimulation = 4.16 ± 0.6 mV and 5.00 ± 0.6 mV [n = 5]; Tables S1 and S2) instead of 2 mM Ca2+ (Figure 1B).
Cholinergic neurons, though, fire at lower frequencies in vivo during slow-wave sleep (average frequency of 0.8–1.9 spikes/s) (Lee et al., 2005; Simon et al., 2006). To mimic this, eight stimuli were delivered at 325 ms intervals (3.08 Hz) during 10 s (average frequency = 0.8 Hz; Figure S1A) and repeated ten times at 0.1 Hz. The initial synaptic potential amplitude (0.88 ± 0.2 mV, n = 6) and summation ratio (2.39 ± 0.3, n = 6) were similar to that with HF stimulation. This LF stimulation also reduced the action potential threshold and enhanced granule cell firing for at least 30 min, with other spike parameters or intrinsic membrane properties not affected (Figure S1 and Tables S1 and S2). Similar effects were observed if cholinergic fibers expressing channelrhodopsin and the fluorescent marker, eYFP, were optically stimulated at 0.8 Hz (protocol similar to LF electrical stimulation) with or without glutamate and GABA receptor blockers (Figure S2). Since LF optical or electrical stimulation effects were comparable to those produced by HF electrical stimulation, it implies that activation of a small population of acetylcholine receptors is sufficient to cause action potential threshold changes.
The granule cell action potential is initiated at the axon initial segment (AIS) (Schmidt-Hieber and Bischofberger, 2010), implying that cholinergic fiber stimulation caused axonal changes. This differed from previous reports indicating that cholinergic fibers affect somato-dendritic excitability in other hippocampal neurons (Buchanan et al., 2010; Cole and Nicoll, 1983; Gu and Yakel, 2011). One explanation might be that the released acetylcholine was degraded rapidly. To test this, we performed HF stimulation in the presence of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, neostigmine (3 μM). The cholinergic synaptic potential summation ratio (10.3 ± 3.6, n = 10) and the spike threshold decrease were significantly greater with neostigmine than in its absence (Figure S3). Additionally, neostigmine caused neuronal depolarization immediately after cholinergic afferent stimulation, which recovered within 10 min (Figure S3). Notwithstanding this, the primary effect of cholinergic afferent stimulation was to induce a long-term spike threshold reduction.
Enhanced Synaptic Potential-Spike Coupling and Spontaneous Action Potential Firing following Cholinergic Afferent Stimulation
We next asked whether the cholinergic afferent stimulation-induced spike threshold decrease might enhance excitatory synaptic potential-spike (E-S) coupling and spontaneous action potential firing. To elicit 50 Hz glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) trains, we stimulated afferents onto granule cell dendrites before and after HF cholinergic fiber stimulation (Figure 1B) in the presence of GABA receptor inhibitors only. The stimulation strength was adjusted so that the EPSP summation was subthreshold (average first EPSP amplitude = 5.01 ± 1.4 mV, n = 6; Figure 1B). Following HF cholinergic afferent stimulation, the initial EPSP amplitude was comparable (5.24 ± 1.5 mV, n = 6) but 50 Hz EPSP trains now resulted in spikes (Figure 1B). This was not due to alterations in pre-synaptic function as subthreshold EPSPs generated using an injected α-waveform yielded spikes following HF cholinergic afferent stimulation (Figure 1B). Further, spontaneous action potential frequency recorded in a “loose” cell-attached mode was significantly enhanced for at least 25 min following HF cholinergic fiber stimulation (Figure 1B). Hence, cholinergic afferent stimulation enhances information processing in hippocampal granule cells by persistently reducing the spike threshold.
Cholinergic Afferent-Induced Long-Term Spike Threshold Plasticity Is Muscarinic Receptor Dependent
Next, we investigated whether muscarinic or nicotinic cholinergic receptors might cause the spike threshold changes. The slow synaptic potentials induced by HF and LF stimulation paradigms as well as the associated spike threshold reductions were inhibited by the muscarinic receptor antagonist, atropine (3 μM, Figure 1, Figure S1) but not by co-application of methyllycaconitine (an α7 receptor antagonist, 10 nM) (Alkondon et al., 1992) and hexamethonium (200 μM, a nicotinic receptor antagonist) (Papke et al., 2010) (spike threshold change with nicotinic receptor inhibitors = 5.58 ± 0.5 mV [n = 6]; Table S2). If atropine was applied following HF cholinergic fiber stimulation (initial EPSP amplitude = 0.54 ± 0.2 mV [n = 6]; summation ratio = 5.87 ± 0.7), the long-lasting spike threshold decrease and increased granule cell firing still occurred (spike threshold decrease immediately and 25 min post-stimulation = 4.28 ± 0.4 mV and 4.78 ± 0.4 mV [n = 6]; Tables S1 and S2). Thus, muscarinic receptor activation was required for the initiation but not the maintenance of the acetylcholine-mediated spike threshold plasticity.
Further, the muscarinic receptor agonist, oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M; 1 μM) replicated the effects of cholinergic fiber stimulation. Oxo-M enhanced action potential firing and decreased spike threshold, which persisted for up to 40 min following Oxo-M washout (Figures 2A and 2F). However, since Oxo-M was bath applied, it had added global effects on granule cell excitability. Thus, Oxo-M, like neostigmine, produced several epiphenomena: RMP depolarization, enhanced RN, and an afterdepolarization (ADP) after the action potentials (Figure 2A, Table S2). These ancillary effects fully reversed upon washout and so did not contribute to the persistent increase in spiking induced by Oxo-M.
Muscarinic Receptor-Induced Intrinsic Plasticity Is Axon Dependent
Is the acetylcholine-induced long-lasting spike threshold decrease axonal? To test this, we patched onto neurons situated near the slice surface whose axons were severed, as shown by post hoc morphological analysis (residual axon length = 6.11 ± 1.2 μm, n = 18; referred to as “axonless” neurons; Figure S4). Sholl analysis showed that the dendritic trees of neurons with intact axons and axonless cells were comparable (Sholl, 1953) (Figure S4). The intrinsic membrane properties of neurons with and without an axon were also similar, indicating that the somato-dendritic conductance properties were unchanged by axon cutting (Table S3). Unlike in long axon neurons (Figure 2A), 1 μM Oxo-M application onto axonless neurons did not alter the spike threshold or granule cell firing (Figures 2B and 2F). Oxo-M, though, still depolarized the RMP, enhanced RN, and induced an ADP following action potential firing in a reversible manner, to an extent comparable to that observed in neurons with axons (Figure 2B, Table S2). This supports the concept that these auxiliary effects are due to changes in somato-dendritic conductances.
To further test whether the effects of acetylcholine were axonal, we focally applied 1 μM Oxo-M for 20 ms onto axons 25–30 μm from the soma or stimulated cholinergic afferents in the CA3a region (i.e., those targeting distal mossy fibers). Both stimuli lowered the spike threshold and enhanced granule cell firing for at least 30 min but did not alter other intrinsic membrane properties (Figures 2C, 2E, and 2F). Synaptic potential-like events, which occurred if the stimulation electrode was placed near proximal dendrites (Figure 1), were not observed either. In contrast, a local puff of 1 μM Oxo-M onto proximal granule cell dendrites 25–30 μm from the soma resulted in a robust excitatory synaptic potential-like event (amplitude = 5.88 ± 2.2 mV, n = 5), greater than that with proximal dendrite cholinergic fiber stimulation (Figure 1A), but had little effect on action potential threshold (Figures 2D and 2F). Instead, the RMP depolarized, RN was enhanced, and a small ADP was induced, effects that reversed fully within 10 min of washout (Figure 2D, Table S2). Hence, axonal and somato-dendritic muscarinic receptors have differential effects: somato-dendritic receptor activation leads to synaptic potential-like events, RMP and RN alterations, and an ADP, while axonal muscarinic receptor stimulation solely causes sustained action potential threshold changes. Since cholinergic fiber stimulation results in a long-lasting spike threshold change only, these data strongly suggest that synaptically released acetylcholine alters granule cell axonal function by preferentially activating axonal muscarinic receptors.
Muscarinic Receptors Are Located on Mossy Fibers, which Cholinergic Axons Contact
To test whether muscarinic receptors are axonal, we performed immunogold labeling using selective M1 and M3 receptor antibodies (Yamasaki et al., 2010). No discernible labeling was observed with the M3 receptor antibody. However, under experimental conditions that did not yield immunolabelling in M1 receptor null tissue (Yamasaki et al., 2010), M1 receptor antibody labeling was detected in granule cell processes, most strongly in dendrites and spines but also along the entire length of mossy fibers (Figure 2G).
To ascertain whether cholinergic fibers innervate granule cell axons, we performed choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) labeling. This confirmed previous indications (Aznavour et al., 2005) that cholinergic axons are interwoven with mossy fibers (Figure S5). Interestingly, ChAT-immunoreactive fibers and boutons were abundant in close proximity of AISs (identified by β1V spectrin labeling; Figure S5, Movie S1). Thus, local acetylcholine release is likely to activate axonal M1 receptors to induce persistent spike threshold reductions.
Muscarinic Receptor Activation Does Not Alter AIS Localization or Length
Since action potentials in granule cells initiate at the AIS (Schmidt-Hieber and Bischofberger, 2010), this suggests that AIS properties are altered following muscarinic receptor activation. The effects that we observed could be due to (1) altered AIS position or (2) modified AIS ion channel expression and/or biophysical properties (Grubb and Burrone, 2010).
We first determined whether AIS localization was altered by performing immunohistochemical analysis in control and Oxo-M-treated slices. Electrophysiological recordings before fixation confirmed that Oxo-M caused spike threshold plasticity (Figure 2A). There was no difference in βIV spectrin, NaV subunits, and ankyrin G labeling between control and Oxo-M-treated slices. The labeling intensity of these peaked ∼10 μm from the soma (Figure S6). The average AIS lengths in control and Oxo-M-treated slices were 28.84 ± 1.05 μm (n = 57, 3 slices) and 26.58 ± 3.14 μm (n = 59, 3 slices, p = 0.54), respectively. This indicates that acute muscarinic receptor activation does not alter the AIS localization or length.
Suppressed Axonal KV7 Channel Function Underlies Muscarinic Receptor-Induced Spike Threshold Long-Term Plasticity
Action potential initiation and upstroke in granule cells are dependent upon Na+ channels (Schmidt-Hieber and Bischofberger, 2010). As the action potential amplitude and width were not altered by endogenous acetylcholine or external application of Oxo-M (Table S1), Na+ channel properties were unlikely to have been affected. In support, the AIS NaV subunit antibody labeling distribution and intensity in control and Oxo-M-treated slices was similar (Figure S6).
Mossy fibers express KV7, KV7.2 and KV7.3 subunits too (Cooper et al., 2001). KV7 channels underlie a non-inactivating K+ current, the M current (Brown and Passmore, 2009), that is inhibited by muscarinic receptors and regulates the action potential threshold in many central neurons (Battefeld et al., 2014; Shah et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2005). Immunohistochemistry showed that KV7.2 and KV7.3 subunits were located in granule cell distal AIS (approximately 20 μm from the soma; Figure S6). Oxo-M treatment did not affect their expression and distribution (Figure S6).
Do KV7 channels modulate the granule cell spike threshold? Application of the specific KV7 channel inhibitor, XE991 (3 μM; Brown and Passmore, 2009), enhanced action potential firing in granule cells with intact axons but not in axonless cells (Figure 3). This effect was predominantly due to reduced action potential threshold, RMP and RN being unaffected (Figure 3, Table S4). Similar results were obtained if axonal KV7 channel function was selectively disrupted by intracellular ankyrin G binding peptide (ABP, YIAEGESDTD; 8 mM) (Shah et al., 2008), but not scrambled ABP (TSEYDAEDIG; 8 mM; Figure 3). Additional XE991 application onto neurons dialysed with ABP, but not those containing sABP, had no further effect (Figure 3). These findings together with KV7.2/7.3 antibody labeling (Figure S6) strongly suggest that KV7 channels are present only in granule cell axons and that their axonal location serves to regulate the action potential threshold. In agreement, we found that the KV7 current measured using voltage clamp could be recorded solely from neurons with long axons but not from axonless neurons (Figure S7).
To discern whether altered KV7 channel function underlies the muscarinic receptor activation-induced persistent action potential threshold reduction, we pretreated granule cells with XE991 (3 μM) and applied either HF cholinergic afferent stimulation or Oxo-M. Neurons treated with XE991 had a lower spike threshold and enhanced excitability than non-treated neurons (Figure 4). For HF stimulation, the initial EPSP amplitude (0.44 ± 0.1 mV, n = 5) and summation ratio (3.04 ± 1.3 mV, n = 5) were comparable to that in non-XE991-treated neurons. However, neither HF cholinergic afferent stimulation nor Oxo-M application in the presence of XE991 altered the spike threshold or granule cell firing (Figure 4A). Oxo-M subsidiary effects (RMP and RN changes and ADP induction) still occurred and recovered within 25 min of washout (Figure 4A, Table S2), further supporting the notion that KV7 channels do not underlie these somato-dendritic effects in granule cells.
The above results suggest that axonal KV7 channels are inhibited in a long-lasting manner by brief muscarinic receptor activation. Indeed, a 10 min Oxo-M application abolished the KV7 current, an effect that did not reverse with washout for at least 20 min (Figure 4B). Subsequent application of XE991 had no further effect (Figure 4B). Hence, muscarinic receptor activation induces long-lasting spike threshold plasticity by persistently inhibiting the axonal KV7 current.
The Spike Threshold Plasticity Is Ca2+ Dependent
The persistent effect of muscarinic receptor activation on axonal KV7 currents (Figure 4B) was unexpected as cholinergic suppression of the somatic KV7 current in other neurons is fully reversible. It is typically due to membrane phosphatidylinositol-4.5-bisphosphate (PIP2) level depletion (Brown and Passmore, 2009; Gamper and Shapiro, 2007; Shen et al., 2005). Upon cholinergic agonist washout, PIP2 levels are replenished, leading to KV7 current recovery (Brown and Passmore, 2009; Gamper and Shapiro, 2007). Our results imply that PIP2 levels may not recover rapidly at the AIS, leading to prolonged axonal KV7 channel inhibition. To test this, we incorporated the water-soluble analog dioctanoyl (diC8)-PIP2 (125 μM [Lukacs et al., 2013]) in the patch pipette to boost PIP2 levels. Interestingly, Oxo-M still persistently lowered the spike threshold (Figure 5A). The Oxo-M-induced ADP, though, was reduced considerably with diC8-PIP2 (Figure 5A, Table S2), suggesting that somato-dendritic PIP2 levels were increased. It should be noted, though, that the AIS is effectively a surface diffusion barrier (Leterrier and Dargent, 2014) and, therefore, artificially altering PIP2 levels might not affect intrinsic AIS lipid levels. Nonetheless, it suggests that the signaling mechanisms underlying muscarinic-receptor suppression of axonal KV7 currents may differ from that described at neuronal somata.
Intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) can also suppress the KV7 current (Gamper and Shapiro, 2007; Selyanko and Brown, 1996). Muscarinic receptor stimulation in hippocampal neurons might raise [Ca2+]i by Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (Gamper and Shapiro, 2007) or augmenting voltage-gated Ca2+ channel (VGCC) opening (Park and Spruston, 2012). We tested these possibilities by incorporating 20 mM BAPTA into the patch pipette or applying the VGCC inhibitor, cadmium chloride (CdCl2; 200 μM). Oxo-M treatment then no longer persistently altered the action potential firing or threshold (Figure 5B). Secondary alterations in RMP and RN still occurred (Figure 5B, Table S2), though the Oxo-M-induced ADP was abolished (Table S2). Hence, muscarinic receptor stimulation elevates [Ca2+]I, via VGCCs to cause spike threshold changes.
Ca2+ Entry via T-Type Ca2+ Channels Is Required for the Muscarinic Receptor-Induced Effects
Since the spike threshold effects occur at rest (Figure 1B), the VGCCs involved are likely to be low-threshold channels such as T-, R-, and L-type Ca2+ channels (Catterall, 2011). Interestingly, in CA1 neurons, muscarinic receptor stimulation enhances R-type Ca2+ channel activity (Park and Spruston, 2012). In granule cells, though, the T-type Ca2+ channel inhibitors, NiCl2 (50 μM) and TTA-P2 (500 nM) (Dreyfus et al., 2010), but not the R-and L-type Ca2+ channel inhibitors, SNX482 (500 nM) and nifedipine (10 μM), prevented the Oxo-M-induced sustained action potential firing and threshold change (Figure 6). All auxiliary effects of Oxo-M (depolarized RMP, enhanced RN, and ADP generation) still occurred, leading to a reversible increase in action potential firing (Figure 6A, Table S2). TTA-P2 also prevented the effects of HF cholinergic afferent stimulation on granule cell excitability (Figure 6, Table S2) but had little effect on cholinergic EPSP amplitude or summation (summation ratio = 2.50 ± 0.36, n = 5).
The above results suggest that the persistent effects of muscarinic activation on granule cell axons required Ca2+ entry via T-type Ca2+ channels. Accordingly, Oxo-M effects on the KV7 current recorded from long axon granule cells were prevented by TTA-P2 (500 nM; Figure 6D). TTA-P2 itself did not affect the KV7 current and the current was still blocked by 3 μM XE991.
The Spike Threshold Plasticity Is due to Sustained Elevated Axonal Basal Ca2+ Entry via T-Type Ca2+ Channels
We next asked whether T-type Ca2+ channels are present in mossy fibers. Three subunits, CaV3.1–3.3, encode for T-type Ca2+ channels (Catterall, 2011). CaV3.2 antibody immunogold particles were detected on wild-type axons, dendrites, and somata spines (Figure 7A). The granule cell axon CaV3.2 labeling, although less than in dendrites and spines, was significantly greater than that in CaV3.2 null granule cell axons (Figure 7A), indicating that CaV3.2 subunits are located in mossy fibers.
Do muscarinic receptors activate axonal T-type Ca2+ channels? To test this, we imaged Ca2+ in granule cell axons using two-photon microscopy. Oxo-M application depolarized somata by 6.29 ± 0.7 mV (n = 8). Simultaneously, the axonal basal [Ca2+]i was increased significantly (Figure 7B). Interestingly, the axonal basal [Ca2+]I augmentation only partly recovered following washout of Oxo-M for up to 40 min and reached a new baseline level significantly above the control, despite the RMP fully recovering (Figure 7B). The axonal [Ca2+]i increase was not due to a somatic RMP change because a 6 mV somatic depolarization caused a substantially smaller axonal [Ca2+]i rise than that observed with Oxo-M and fully reversed on RMP restoration (data not shown). The Oxo-M-induced basal axonal [Ca2+]i escalation was abolished by TTA-P2 (500 nM; Figure 7B). Hence, muscarinic receptor activation increases basal T-type Ca2+ channel function in granule cells resulting in a long-term rise in basal axonal [Ca2+]I.
Previous studies have indicated that axonal T-type Ca2+ currents can regulate the action potential threshold (Bender et al., 2010; Ohkuma et al., 2013). T-type Ca2+ channel inhibitors, though, did not affect the granule cell spike threshold (Figure 6B). In support, we found the action potential-associated [Ca2+]i rise was similar under control conditions, following 10 min Oxo-M treatment and after 25 min washout (Figure 7C). This reinforces the notion that Oxo-M-augmented T-type Ca2+ channel activity predominantly enhances basal axonal [Ca2+]i levels.
One reason might be that the biophysical properties of axonal T-type Ca2+ channels are altered. We thus recorded the T-type Ca2+ current from long axon and axonless neuronal somata. T-type Ca2+ currents were stable for up to 40 min, activated above −80 mV (Figure S8), and were inhibited by TTA-P2 (500 nM, n = 16) and CdCl2 (200 μM, n = 3) but not XE991 (3 μM, n = 6; data not shown). Although the half-activation potentials in long axon (V1/2 = −61.2 ± 1.3 mV, n = 8) and axonless (V1/2 = −59.6 ± 1.4 mV, n = 6) neurons were comparable, the current amplitudes were significantly smaller in axonless neurons than long axon neurons (maximal amplitude at −40 mV in long axon and axonless neurons = 112.5 ± 11.0 pA [n = 8] and 70.7 ± 18.8 pA [n = 6], p < 0.05). Oxo-M shifted the T-type Ca2+ current activation curve in long axon neurons, but not axonless neurons, to the left without affecting the slope of the curve (Figure S8). The currents at −80 mV and −70 mV were substantially enhanced by Oxo-M in long axon neurons but the peak current amplitudes were no different (Figure S8). These Oxo-M effects on T-type Ca2+ currents in long axon neurons were maintained for at least 25 min following washout (Figure S8). Hence, these results strongly support the idea that muscarinic receptor activation leads to a persistent rise in axonal basal [Ca2+]i by enhancing T-type Ca2+ channel function.
T-Type Ca2+ Channel Inhibition Fully Reverses the Spike Threshold Plasticity
If the persistent increase in T-type Ca2+ channel activity at rest is the cause of the muscarinic receptor-induced action potential threshold plasticity, then applying TTA-P2 after Oxo-M should rescue this. Indeed, we found that inclusion of TTA-P2 (500 nM) during washout after Oxo-M treatment of granule cells restored the spike firing and threshold to that observed under control conditions (Figure 8).
Moreover, since T-type Ca2+ channels are not active at −90 mV (Figure S8), muscarinic receptor activation at this potential would not be predicted to induce action potential threshold or firing alterations. In support, 1 μM Oxo-M application and washout had little effect on spike threshold or firing at −90 mV (control and Oxo-M spike threshold difference = 0.55 ± 0.4 mV [n = 6]). Hence, our findings strongly suggest that muscarinic receptor activation in granule cells leads to a long-term enhanced T-type Ca2+ channel openings at rest, which results in sustained elevated [Ca2+]i and persistently reduced axonal KV7 channel function.
Discussion
We found that synaptically released acetylcholine preferentially lowered the action potential threshold in granule cells, an effect that persisted at least 30 min (Figure 1, Figures S1–S3). Consequently, there was a greater propensity for granule cells to elicit action potentials with depolarizing stimuli and E-S coupling and spontaneous spike frequency were enhanced (Figure 1). These effects were due to axonal muscarinic receptor-induced sustained enhancement of axonal T-type Ca2+ channel function at rest (Figures 2, 6, and 7, Figure S8) such that axonal basal [Ca2+]i was elevated (Figure 7). This inhibited KV7 channel function (Figure 5), and as KV7 channels regulate the spike threshold in granule cells (Figure 3), there was a prolonged reduction in this. Indeed, the long-lasting decrease in spike threshold could be reversed if T-type Ca2+ channel activity was inhibited following the muscarinic receptor stimulation (Figure 8). Given that increased granule cell spike frequency will result in more effective discharge of post-synaptic hippocampal CA3 neurons (Henze et al., 2002), our results suggest that acetylcholine is likely to boost granule cell information processing by augmenting axonal signaling. As granule cell activity is normally sparse in vivo (Henze et al., 2002; Pernía-Andrade and Jonas, 2014), this is likely to be a critical mechanism for enhancing their excitability to allow efficient information transfer to post-synaptic neurons.
Cholinergic Afferent Stimulation Preferentially Modulates Axonal Excitability in Granule Cells
ChAT labeling showed that cholinergic fibers project to DG molecular, granular, and hilus regions where granule cell dendrites, somata, and axons are located (Figure S5) (Aznavour et al., 2005). Remarkably, in these neurons electrical or optical stimulation paradigms, with or without glutamate and GABA receptor inhibitors, resulted in endogenous acetylcholine release that affected the action potential threshold only (Figure 1, Figures S1 and S2). Other spike characteristics or intrinsic membrane properties were unaltered. This suggested that the acetylcholine effects were axonal. In support, Oxo-M local axonal application or cholinergic afferent stimulation to axons replicated these findings (Figure 2). Muscarinic receptors were located on mossy fibers but their density was lower than in dendrites and spines (Figure 2G). These findings suggest that the effects of endogenous acetylcholine release are highly specific and constrained to defined targets and cholinergic fiber stimulation preferentially activates axonal muscarinic receptors, even though they are present at a lower density in axons. This is in line with previous studies using cell lines that show that a small fraction of receptors adequately causes the appropriate downstream effects (Falkenburger et al., 2013).
One reason for the preferential axonal response might be that granule cell dendritic intrinsic properties are such that signals received by these are strongly attenuated (Krueppel et al., 2011). Synaptically released acetylcholine may have also stimulated dendritic muscarinic receptors because this, like focal application of Oxo-M to dendrites, produced synaptic potential-like events (Figure 1). This dendritic muscarinic receptor activation, though, was not sufficient to cause intrinsic membrane property alterations that are associated with somato-dendritic receptor activation (Figure 2). Nonetheless, under some conditions, cholinergic afferent inputs might robustly activate dendritic muscarinic receptors, leading to altered somato-dendritic membrane properties, as in hippocampal pyramidal neurons (Buchanan et al., 2010; Cole and Nicoll, 1983; Gu and Yakel, 2011). Indeed, in the presence of neostigmine, a significantly greater reduction in spike threshold together with a transient somatic RMP depolarization occurred (Figure S3). The RMP depolarization is likely to be due to increased somato-dendritic muscarinic receptor recruitment from enhanced volume transmission of synaptically released acetylcholine. This indicates that the cholinergic fiber stimulation strength coupled, perhaps, with the pattern of stimulation in vivo might dictate axonal versus dendritic effects of acetylcholine.
The preferential axonal function alteration by cholinergic afferent stimulation is of considerable significance for granule cells. Most glutamatergic synaptic inputs are onto granule cell dendrites but, as dendritic signals in granule cells are significantly attenuated, only strong inputs will impact their excitability (Krueppel et al., 2011). Our results suggest that the cholinergic fiber stimulation dynamically boosts granule cell activity so that even weak synaptic information received by their dendrites can be efficiently transferred to post-synaptic neurons. Indeed, E-S potentiation and spontaneous action potential frequency were enhanced following cholinergic afferent stimulation (Figure 1B). Consequently, mossy fiber transmission may be enhanced, leading to enhanced synaptic potentiation at these synapses.
Enhanced T-Type Ca2+ Channel Activity Underlies the Axonal Muscarinic Receptor-Induced Effects
We show that that muscarinic receptor stimulation led to a persistent axonal basal [Ca2+]i enhancement by increasing T- (CaV3.2) type Ca2+ channel activity at rest (Figures 6 and 7). This was due to a shift in the axonal T-type Ca2+ activation curve by muscarinic receptors (Figure S8). As CaV3.2 subunits are expressed globally in granule cells (Figure 7), this suggests that the coupling of muscarinic receptors to CaV3.2 channels might be weaker in somata and dendrites compared with axons. Accordingly, Oxo-M did not alter somato-dendritic T-type currents in axonless neurons (Figure S8). Although this was unexpected, a selective axonal, but not dendritic, T-type Ca2+ channel inhibition by dopamine occurs in cochlear interneurons (Bender et al., 2010). Hence, axonal signaling microdomains might differ from those in other neuronal compartments.
Cholinergic receptor-induced T-type Ca2+ channel activation is both necessary and sufficient for the enhanced excitability as T-type Ca2+ channel antagonists prevented and reversed the spike threshold long-lasting plasticity (Figures 6 and 8). Unlike in some other neurons (Bender et al., 2010; Ohkuma et al., 2013), the T-type Ca2+ channels per se did not affect the action potential threshold (Figure 6). Further, though T-type Ca2+ channel activity at potentials near the granule cell RMP were enhanced by Oxo-M, the current at voltages near the spike threshold were similar (Figure S8). In support, the spike-associated [Ca2+]i rise was similar before and after Oxo-M treatment (Figure 7). The axonal basal [Ca2+]i rise by Oxo-M then suppressed axonal KV7 current, which regulates the spike threshold (Figures 3 and 5) While it is known that [Ca2+]i ≤ 100 nM inhibits KV7/M channels (Selyanko and Brown, 1996), the muscarinic receptor-induced sustained Ca2+ entry via T-type Ca2+ channels causing KV7 channel plasticity is a novel, distinct phenomenon.
How might brief muscarinic receptor activation lead to a persistent shift in T-type Ca2+ activation curve (Figure S8)? Native and expressed CaV3.2 currents (including those in some interneuron AISs [Bender et al., 2010]) are modified by kinases such as protein kinase C (Bender et al., 2010; Park et al., 2006). Since muscarinic receptor stimulation alters the activity of multiple kinases, there is a strong possibility that the muscarinic receptor-induced axonal T-type Ca2+ channel long-term plasticity is kinase mediated too.
In summary, our findings show that cholinergic fiber activation reduces the action potential threshold persistently such that granule cells will respond with greater fidelity to additional excitatory inputs (Figure 1). This is, as yet, an unreported action of acetylcholine that might influence cognitive function. While, we conducted our study in the dentate gyrus, the findings may also be applicable to other hippocampal regions. In fact, cholinergic fibers innervate the stratum oriens where hippocampal CA1 and CA3 neuron axons reside (Aznavour et al., 2005). In these neurons, KV7 subunits are axonal (Devaux et al., 2004) and also play a significant role in setting the action potential threshold (Shah et al., 2008). Hence, the acetylcholine-induced action potential threshold long-lasting plasticity might be a common cellular mechanism that plays a fundamental role in neuronal information processing and storage.
Experimental Procedures
Acute Slice Preparation
The UK Home Office approved all procedures. 22- to 27-day-old male Sprague Dawley rat pups and 5- to 6-week-old B6 mice expressing channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2) and eYFP in cholinergic fibers (kind gift from Prof. D. Kullman, UCL Institute of Neurology) were decapitated and the brain removed and submerged in ice-cold solution containing the following: 87 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, 75 mM sucrose, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 7 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.3), 325 mOsm/l. The brain was hemi-sected and a cut parallel to the dorsal part of the brain made. The ventral side brain halves were glued onto a slice holder and 350 μm slices made (Leica VT1200S, Leica). Slices were incubated in the cutting solution for 10 min at 35°C and then stored at room temperature.
Electrophysiological Whole-Cell Recordings
Slices were transferred to a submerged chamber containing external solution containing the following: 125 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 25 mM glucose, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.05 mM CNQX, 0.05 mM DL-AP5, 0.01 mM bicuculline, 0.001 mM CGP 55845 (pH 7.3), 32°C–36°C. The internal pipette solution contained the following: 120 mM KMeSO4, 15 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EGTA, 2 mM Na2ATP, 0.3 mM Tris-GTP, and 14 mM Tris-phosphocreatinine (pH 7.3) with KOH, 295–300 mOsm/l. In some experiments, 8 mM ABP or sABP was added to the internal solution. When 20 mM K4BAPTA was added to the pipette solution, KMeSO4 was reduced to 60 mM and osmolarity adjusted by adding N-methyl-d-glucamine (NMDG). Pipettes had resistances of 5–8 MΩ. In all experiments, Neurobiotin (0.2% w/v) was included in the intracellular pipette solution. Slices were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with streptavidin Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate 24 hr later (Huang et al., 2012)
Electrophysiological recordings were made using a Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Recordings were filtered at 10 kHz and sampled at 50 kHz. Data were acquired using pClamp 10.0 (Molecular Devices). Series resistance was in the order of 10–20 MΩ. Recordings were discarded if the series resistance increased by more than 20%.
All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich apart from tetrodotoxin, bicuculline, CGP 55845, DL-AP5, and XE991, which were obtained from Abcam. Neurobiotin was acquired from Vector Laboratories and streptavidin Alexa Fluor 488 was procured from Life Technologies.
Cholinergic Afferent Stimulation Experiments
Unless otherwise stated, the following was added to the whole-cell external recording solution: 0.1 mM (RS)-α-Methylserine-O-phosphate (MSOP) and 1 mM (RS)-α-Methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG) disodium salt. Cholinergic afferents were electrically stimulated using tungsten electrodes (A-M systems) or by activating channelrhodpsin with a 488 nm laser (Cairn Research). 8–10, 0.1 ms, 50–200 μA pulses or 8, 10 ms, 9 mW light pulses were delivered.
E-S Coupling Experiments
CNQX and APV were omitted from the external solution. Glutamatergic EPSPs were evoked using tungsten electrodes placed in stratum moleculare 100–150 μm from granule cell bodies. 10, 0.1 ms pulses were applied at 50 Hz. Simulated EPSPs were generated by injecting the waveform:
where A is the injected current amplitude and τ is the rise time constant.
Spontaneous Action Potential Recordings
“Loose” seals of 236.8 ± 52 MΩ were made with 3–5 MΩ patch pipettes filled with 150 mM NaCl. The external solution lacked glutamate receptor blockers. 15 min continuous recordings were made before and after cholinergic afferent stimulation.
Oxo-M Local Application
2–3 MΩ patch pipettes filled with Oxo-M were placed in close proximity to identified axons or dendrites 25–30 μm from the somata. 20 ms, 10 psi pressure was applied using a Picospritzer III (Intracel). The puff encompassed an area of approximately 30 μm, indicating that somatic muscarinic receptors were unlikely to be affected.
KV7 Current Recordings
The external solution was supplemented with 0.001 mM tetrodotoxin (TTx) and 0.1 mM 4-aminopyridine (4-AP). Amphotericin (0.1 mg/ml) was included in the internal solution. Series resistance was between 20 and 40 MΩ and was ∼70% compensated. A de-activation protocol (Shah et al., 2008) was applied in the absence and presence of the KV7 channel blocker, XE991 (3 μM). Recordings were filtered at 1 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz.
T-Type Ca2+ Current Measurements
The external solution was supplemented with 0.001 mM TTx, 2 mM CsCl2, 10 mM TEA, 0.1 mM 4-AP, 0.005 mM nifedipine, 0.0001 mM ω-agatoxin IVA, 0.0001 mM ω-conotoxin GVIA, and 0.0002 mM SNX482. The internal pipette solution was 120 mM CsCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM Na2ATP, 0.3 mM Tris-GTP, and 14 mM Tris-phosphocreatinine (pH 7.3) with KOH, 295–300 mOsm/l. Whole-cell somatic voltage-clamp recordings were made. A 1 s pre-pulse to −100 mV followed by 1 s pulses ranging from −90 mV to −30 mV in 10 mV increments were applied. Leak currents were obtained with 1 s, 10 mV hyperpolarizing steps from −100 mV. All recordings were leak subtracted and TTA-P2 (500 nM) applied at the end. Recordings were filtered at 10 KHz and sampled at 50 kHz.
Electrophysiological Data Analysis
Clampfit (v10.0) was used. The threshold of single action potentials elicited by 30 ms current steps from −70 mV was measured by differentiating the spike voltage with respect to time (dV/dt). This was plotted against the voltage to create a phase plane plot. The threshold was defined as the voltage at the point of deflection for dV/dt to be greater than zero. Action potential height was measured from threshold to the peak, whereas action potential width was the breadth at half the height.
To calculate RN, we divided the difference in steady-state voltage in the last 25 ms elicited by a 100 pA 400 ms hyperpolarizing step at −70 mV by the applied current. Action potentials elicited by 400 ms depolarizing steps were counted. The peak and area under ADP, if evoked, were also measured.
Cholinergic EPSP summation ratios were calculated as the amplitude of the last EPSP in the train divided by the amplitude of the first EPSP.
The numbers of spontaneous action potentials generated in 15 min during loose cell-attached recordings were counted and the frequency calculated.
For KV7/M-current voltage-clamp data, the traces obtained in the presence of the XE991 (3 μM) were subtracted from those in the absence. The subtracted traces were fitted with the following to obtain the decay time constants:
where τ1 and τ2 represent time constants of the initial and late phase of the KV7 current.
The KV7 conductance values were generated from the normalized amplitudes of the subtracted currents (Shah et al., 2008) and were plotted against the voltage. The curves were fitted using the Boltzmann equation:
where A1 and A2 are the initial and maximum values, x0 is the half-activation voltage and dx is the slope of the curve.
Ca2+ currents obtained in the presence of TTA-P2 (500 nM) were subtracted from those in the absence of the current to obtain the T-type Ca2+ current. The peak current amplitude was plotted against the voltage to obtain the activation curves (Dreyfus et al., 2010). Curves were fitted using the above Boltzmann equation.
Sholl Analysis
A similar method to that described by Huang et al. (2012) was used. Briefly, Confocal (Zeiss LSM 710) images of stained neurons were acquired. In Image J (NIH), 10 μm concentric circles were generated around the somata (Sholl, 1953), the number of dendrites crossing each circle counted.
Two-Photon Ca2+ Imaging Experiments
A Prairie Ultima multi-photon microscopy system (Prairie Technologies) was used. The Mai Tai laser (Spectra-Physics) was tuned to 820 nm. Experiments were done at 32°C–34°C. The internal solution was supplemented with a red fluorophore (50 μM Alexa Fluor 594; Invitrogen) and the Ca2+-sensitive green fluorophore, Oregon green BAPTA-1 (200 μM; Invitrogen) for basal [Ca2+]i measurements. When measuring [Ca2+]i during action potential waveforms, the Ca2+-sensitive green fluorophore, Fluo-5F (250 μM; Invitrogen) together with Alexa Fluor 594 were utilized (Bender et al., 2010). Cells were filled with dyes for at least 20 min before images were acquired. The granule cell axon was identified as the process that lacked spines. At least three cross-sectional line scans were made at 667 Hz in the distal axon initial segment (25–30 μm from soma; Figure 7B) and averaged to obtain the signal. Background currents were recorded at the end of experiments. The fluorescence was quantified as:
Fgreen and Fred are the green and red fluorescence signals and Fdark green and Idark, red are the background currents in the green and red channels, respectively.
Electron Microscopy Experiments
Three adult rats and CaV3.2 null mice were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine-xylazine 1:1 (0.1 ml/kg) and transcardially perfused with ice-cold fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.05% glutaraldehyde, and 15% saturated picric acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4). After perfusion, brains were removed and immersed in the fixative for 2 hr or overnight at 4°C. Tissue blocks were washed in 0.1 M PB. 60 μm coronal sections were cut with a Vibratome (Leica V1000). Free-floating sections were incubated in 10% NGS diluted in TBS, then with the primary antibodies (2–5 μg/ml), followed by goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG coupled to 1.4 nm gold (Nanoprobes). Sections were post-fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and washed in double-distilled water, followed by silver enhancement of the gold particles with an HQ Silver kit (Nanoprobes). Sections were then treated with osmium tetraoxide (1% in 0.1 M PB), block stained with uranyl acetate, dehydrated in graded series of ethanol, and flat embedded on glass slides in Durcupan (Fluka) resin. Regions of interest (ROIs) were cut at 70–90 nm on an ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut E, Leica) and collected on 200-mesh copper grids. Staining was performed on drops of 1% aqueous uranyl acetate followed by Reynolds’s lead citrate. Ultrastructural analyses were performed with a Jeol-1010 electron microscope (Japan).
Affinity-purified rabbit anti-M1 was characterized previously (Yamasaki et al., 2010). The monoclonal antibody against CaV3.2 (Clone N55/10) was obtained from the NeuroMab Facility (University of California, Davis). No labeling was observed if the primary antibody was either omitted or replaced with 5% (v/v) normal serum.
Light Microscopy Experiments
All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Baylor College of Medicine.
Colocalization of AISs and Cholinergic Fibers
Three postnatal days 22–29 Sprague-Dawley rats were deeply anesthetized and perfused with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde. Brains were removed, kept at 4°C overnight in the fixative, and then stored in PBS. 40 μm floating sections were cut (VT1200S, Leica), rinsed in PBS, blocked, and permeabilized for 1 hr at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight (mouse α-ChAT, Chemicon; rabbit α-βIV-Spectrin [Ogawa et al., 2006]). Sections were washed extensively, incubated with secondary antibodies (goat α-mouse IgG1 γ1 555, Invitrogen; donkey α-rabbit DyLight 488, Jackson), washed again, and coverslipped (Prolong Gold with DAPI, Invitrogen). Image stacks were acquired using a C2 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Nikon). Maximal intensity projections of z stacks 3D views, and movies were created using NIS-Elements.
Quantification of KCNQ2 and KCNQ2 Immunolabeling
Hippocampal slices were treated with either vehicle (control) or Oxo-M (1 μM), irradiated in sodium citrate-EDTA buffer (pH 8.5) using a microwave oven (Sears), then washed in PBS, blocked for 1 hr at room temperature, and incubated with primary antibodies for 48 hr (mouse α-PanNaV IgG1, Sigma; rabbit α-KCNQ2n; guinea pig α-KCNQ3n) followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (donkey α-mouse-Cy3, Jackson; donkey α-rabbit-DyLight 488, Jackson; donkey α-guinea pig-Cy5, Jackson). Image stacks were acquired using a Nikon C2 laser-scanning confocal microscope. Four regions of interest (ROIs) spanning the dentate granule cell layer were analyzed. ROI dimensions were 92.3 μm × 46.1 μm × 20.3 μm deep. Five AISs in each ROI were analyzed for length and labeling intensity. Using maximal projection and 3D views in NIS-Elements, we drew a 3D polyline along the axon, from soma to beyond the AIS. This was converted to a 2D (xy versus z) plot and labeling at each pixel along the trajectory for each fluorophore was read. Pixel intensities normalized to the max intensity for each fluorophore. For each group, AIS lengths were estimated from NaV staining and normalized to an average AIS length. Raw pixel intensities, without background subtraction, were binned in 2 μm lengths and averaged per bin for each group.
Statistical Methods
Group data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using either paired or unpaired Student’s t tests as appropriate. Statistical significance of differences at p < 0.05 is indicated as asterisks (∗) in all figures.
Author Contributions
K.M., Z.H., R.L., B.T., E.C., and M.M.S. performed experiments and analyzed data. M.W. contributed valuable re-agents. M.M.S., R.L., E.C., and D.A.B. designed experiments. M.M.S. and D.A.B. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all authors.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the BBSRC (BB/L000679/1; M.M.S.), Wellcome Trust (WT087363MA, M.M.S., D.A.B.), an ERC Starter Independent Grant (GA 260725 IRPHRCSTP, M.M.S.), the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (BFU-2012-38348; R.L.), the CONSOLIDER programme (CSD2008-00005, R.L.), and NIH RO1 NS49119 (B.T., E.C.C.). B.T. is an Epilepsy Foundation predoctoral fellow supported by the American Epilepsy Society and the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation. We thank Professor M. Rasband (Baylor College of Medicine, USA) for the gift of anti-β4 spectrin antibodies, Merck Research Laboratories (Pennsylvania, USA) for providing TTA-P2, Dr. A. Mercer (UCL School of Pharmacy, UK) for the Cairn OptoLED light source (Cairn Research, UK) and Dr. C. Schmidt-Heiber (UCL Wolfson Institute of Biomedical Research, UK), and Professor M. Walker (UCL Institute of Neurology, UK) for comments.
Footnotes
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Supplemental Information
References
- Acsády L., Káli S. Models, structure, function: the transformation of cortical signals in the dentate gyrus. Prog. Brain Res. 2007;163:577–599. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)63031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alkondon M., Pereira E.F., Wonnacott S., Albuquerque E.X. Blockade of nicotinic currents in hippocampal neurons defines methyllycaconitine as a potent and specific receptor antagonist. Mol. Pharmacol. 1992;41:802–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aznavour N., Watkins K.C., Descarries L. Postnatal development of the cholinergic innervation in the dorsal hippocampus of rat: Quantitative light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical study. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005;486:61–75. doi: 10.1002/cne.20501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Battefeld A., Tran B.T., Gavrilis J., Cooper E.C., Kole M.H. Heteromeric Kv7.2/7.3 channels differentially regulate action potential initiation and conduction in neocortical myelinated axons. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:3719–3732. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4206-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bean B.P. The action potential in mammalian central neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:451–465. doi: 10.1038/nrn2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bender K.J., Ford C.P., Trussell L.O. Dopaminergic modulation of axon initial segment calcium channels regulates action potential initiation. Neuron. 2010;68:500–511. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brazhnik E.S., Fox S.E. Action potentials and relations to the theta rhythm of medial septal neurons in vivo. Exp. Brain Res. 1999;127:244–258. doi: 10.1007/s002210050794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown D.A., Passmore G.M. Neural KCNQ (Kv7) channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;156:1185–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchanan K.A., Petrovic M.M., Chamberlain S.E., Marrion N.V., Mellor J.R. Facilitation of long-term potentiation by muscarinic M(1) receptors is mediated by inhibition of SK channels. Neuron. 2010;68:948–963. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buzsáki G. Theta oscillations in the hippocampus. Neuron. 2002;33:325–340. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00586-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catterall W.A. Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011;3:a003947. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole A.E., Nicoll R.A. Acetylcholine mediates a slow synaptic potential in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Science. 1983;221:1299–1301. doi: 10.1126/science.6612345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper E.C., Harrington E., Jan Y.N., Jan L.Y. M channel KCNQ2 subunits are localized to key sites for control of neuronal network oscillations and synchronization in mouse brain. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:9529–9540. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09529.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulter D.A., Carlson G.C. Functional regulation of the dentate gyrus by GABA-mediated inhibition. Prog. Brain Res. 2007;163:235–243. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)63014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Debanne D., Campanac E., Bialowas A., Carlier E., Alcaraz G. Axon physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91:555–602. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devaux J.J., Kleopa K.A., Cooper E.C., Scherer S.S. KCNQ2 is a nodal K+ channel. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:1236–1244. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4512-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dreyfus F.M., Tscherter A., Errington A.C., Renger J.J., Shin H.S., Uebele V.N., Crunelli V., Lambert R.C., Leresche N. Selective T-type calcium channel block in thalamic neurons reveals channel redundancy and physiological impact of I(T)window. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:99–109. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4305-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falkenburger B.H., Dickson E.J., Hille B. Quantitative properties and receptor reserve of the DAG and PKC branch of G(q)-coupled receptor signaling. J. Gen. Physiol. 2013;141:537–555. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201210887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamper N., Shapiro M.S. Regulation of ion transport proteins by membrane phosphoinositides. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:921–934. doi: 10.1038/nrn2257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grubb M.S., Burrone J. Building and maintaining the axon initial segment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010;20:481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu Z., Yakel J.L. Timing-dependent septal cholinergic induction of dynamic hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2011;71:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasselmo M.E., Sarter M. Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:52–73. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henze D.A., Wittner L., Buzsáki G. Single granule cells reliably discharge targets in the hippocampal CA3 network in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:790–795. doi: 10.1038/nn887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Z., Lujan R., Martinez-Hernandez J., Lewis A.S., Chetkovich D.M., Shah M.M. TRIP8b-independent trafficking and plasticity of adult cortical presynaptic HCN1 channels. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:14835–14848. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1544-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones B.E. Activity, modulation and role of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons innervating the cerebral cortex. Prog. Brain Res. 2004;145:157–169. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)45011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kole M.H., Stuart G.J. Signal processing in the axon initial segment. Neuron. 2012;73:235–247. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krueppel R., Remy S., Beck H. Dendritic integration in hippocampal dentate granule cells. Neuron. 2011;71:512–528. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M.G., Hassani O.K., Alonso A., Jones B.E. Cholinergic basal forebrain neurons burst with theta during waking and paradoxical sleep. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:4365–4369. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0178-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leterrier C., Dargent B. No Pasaran! Role of the axon initial segment in the regulation of protein transport and the maintenance of axonal identity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;27:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lübke J., Frotscher M., Spruston N. Specialized electrophysiological properties of anatomically identified neurons in the hilar region of the rat fascia dentata. J. Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1518–1534. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.3.1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lukacs V., Yudin Y., Hammond G.R., Sharma E., Fukami K., Rohacs T. Distinctive changes in plasma membrane phosphoinositides underlie differential regulation of TRPV1 in nociceptive neurons. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:11451–11463. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5637-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogawa Y., Schafer D.P., Horresh I., Bar V., Hales K., Yang Y., Susuki K., Peles E., Stankewich M.C., Rasband M.N. Spectrins and ankyrinB constitute a specialized paranodal cytoskeleton. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:5230–5239. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohkuma M., Kawai F., Miyachi E. Acetylcholine enhances excitability by lowering the threshold of spike generation in olfactory receptor cells. J. Neurophysiol. 2013;110:2082–2089. doi: 10.1152/jn.01077.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papke R.L., Wecker L., Stitzel J.A. Activation and inhibition of mouse muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010;333:501–518. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.164566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park J.Y., Spruston N. Synergistic actions of metabotropic acetylcholine and glutamate receptors on the excitability of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:6081–6091. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6519-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park J.Y., Kang H.W., Moon H.J., Huh S.U., Jeong S.W., Soldatov N.M., Lee J.H. Activation of protein kinase C augments T-type Ca2+ channel activity without changing channel surface density. J. Physiol. 2006;577:513–523. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pelkey K.A., McBain C.J. Target-cell-dependent plasticity within the mossy fibre-CA3 circuit reveals compartmentalized regulation of presynaptic function at divergent release sites. J. Physiol. 2008;586:1495–1502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.148635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pernía-Andrade A.J., Jonas P. Theta-gamma-modulated synaptic currents in hippocampal granule cells in vivo define a mechanism for network oscillations. Neuron. 2014;81:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Picciotto M.R., Higley M.J., Mineur Y.S. Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron. 2012;76:116–129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Hieber C., Bischofberger J. Fast sodium channel gating supports localized and efficient axonal action potential initiation. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:10233–10242. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6335-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selyanko A.A., Brown D.A. Intracellular calcium directly inhibits potassium M channels in excised membrane patches from rat sympathetic neurons. Neuron. 1996;16:151–162. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80032-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah M.M., Migliore M., Valencia I., Cooper E.C., Brown D.A. Functional significance of axonal Kv7 channels in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:7869–7874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802805105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen W., Hamilton S.E., Nathanson N.M., Surmeier D.J. Cholinergic suppression of KCNQ channel currents enhances excitability of striatal medium spiny neurons. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:7449–7458. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1381-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sholl D.A. Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. J. Anat. 1953;87:387–406. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon A.P., Poindessous-Jazat F., Dutar P., Epelbaum J., Bassant M.H. Firing properties of anatomically identified neurons in the medial septum of anesthetized and unanesthetized restrained rats. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:9038–9046. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1401-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skaggs W.E., McNaughton B.L., Wilson M.A., Barnes C.A. Theta phase precession in hippocampal neuronal populations and the compression of temporal sequences. Hippocampus. 1996;6:149–172. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1996)6:2<149::AID-HIPO6>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamasaki M., Matsui M., Watanabe M. Preferential localization of muscarinic M1 receptor on dendritic shaft and spine of cortical pyramidal cells and its anatomical evidence for volume transmission. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:4408–4418. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5719-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.