Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1976 Aug;73(8):2881–2884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2881

Lymphocyte stimulation: a rapid multiparameter analysis.

Z Darzynkiewicz, F Traganos, T Sharpless, M R Melamed
PMCID: PMC430788  PMID: 822422

Abstract

Several parameters of stimulation of individual lymphocytes are measured simultaneously by flow-cytofluorometry after differential staining of cellular DNA and RNA with the metachromatic fluorescent dye acridine orange. The method provides a means of analyzing the progression of stimulated cells through the cell cycle (G1, S and G2 + M), in addition to measuring the accumulation of RNA per cell; the RNA parameter is useful in distinguishing G1 from G0 cells. The multiparameter analysis may be of unique value in discriminating cases where the transcriptional and proliferative responses of lymphocytes to stimulants are not correlated.

Full text

PDF
2881

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bleyman M., Woese C. "Transcriptional mapping". I. Introduction to the method and the use of actinomycin D as a transcriptional mapping agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Jun;63(2):532–539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.2.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley D. F., Wolf M. K. AGGREGATION OF DYES BOUND TO POLYANIONS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1959 Jul;45(7):944–952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.7.944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braunstein J. D., Melamed M. R., Darzynkiewicz, Traganos F., Sharpless T., Good R. A. Quantitation of transformed lymphocytes by flow cytofluorimetry. 1. Phytohemagglutinin response. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1975 Jul;4(2):209–215. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(75)90056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Darzynkiewicz Z., Arnason B. G. Suppression of RNA synthesis in lymphocytes by inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Mar 30;85(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90217-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darzynkiewicz Z., Traganos F., Sharpless T., Melamed M. R. Conformation of RNA in situ as studied by acridine orange staining and automated cytofluorometry. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Oct 1;95(1):143–153. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90619-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Douglas S. D., Fudenberg H. H. In vitro development of plasma cells from lymphocytes following pokeweed mitogen stimulation: a fine structural study. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Feb;54(2):277–279. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90252-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dukes C. D., Parsons J. L., Stephens C. A., Jr Use of acridine orange in lymphocyte transformation test. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Sep;131(4):1168–1170. doi: 10.3181/00379727-131-34062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Durkin H. G., Bash J. A., Waksman B. H. Separation of T cell subpopulations capable of DNA synthesis, lymphotoxin release, and regulation of antigen and phytohemagglutinin responses on the basis of density and adherence properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):5090–5094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.5090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haskill J. S. Discussion paper: studies on the differentiation within the immune system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1973 May 31;207:57–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb47476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kay J. E., Leventhal B. G., Cooper H. L. Effects of inhibition of ribosomal RNA synthesis on the stimulation of lymphocytes by phytohaemagglutinin. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Jan;54(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90297-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LERMAN L. S. The structure of the DNA-acridine complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Jan 15;49:94–102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.49.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Le Pecq J. B. Use of ethidium bromide for separation and determination of nucleic acids of various conformational forms and measurement of their associated enzymes. Methods Biochem Anal. 1971;20:41–86. doi: 10.1002/9780470110393.ch2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Melamed M. R., Kamentsky L. A. Automated cytology. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1975;14:205–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. NOWELL P. C. Phytohemagglutinin: an initiator of mitosis in cultures of normal human leukocytes. Cancer Res. 1960 May;20:462–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parkhouse R. M., Janossy G., Greaves M. F. Selective stimulation of IgM synthesis in mouse B lymphocytes by pokeweed mitogen. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jan 5;235(53):21–23. doi: 10.1038/newbio235021a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rigler R., Jr Microfluorometric characterization of intracellular nucleic acids and nucleoproteins by acridine orange. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1966;267:1–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sörén L. Variability of the time at which PHA-stimulated lymphocytes initiate DNA synthesis. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Mar 30;78(1):201–208. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90055-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tal M. Metal ions and ribosomal conformation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Nov 19;195(1):76–86. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(69)90604-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES