Skip to main content
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease logoLink to Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
editorial
. 2014 Jun 25;3(3):e001168. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001168

Priming Mononuclear Cells to Improve Outcomes of Regenerative Therapy

Kashyap Choksi 1, Buddhadeb Dawn 1
PMCID: PMC4309101  PMID: 24965029

Introduction

In a seminal report in 1997, Asahara and colleagues1 first described the existence of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in human peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction. In a subsequent report,2 they described the ability of bone marrow (BM)‐derived circulating EPCs to induce neovascularization. The obvious therapeutic potential of EPCs for ischemic diseases has since driven intense research focused on vasculogenic cells from diverse sources with variable phenotypic attributes and biological functions. Although data from clinical trials have shown a modest positive impact of circulating progenitor therapy in cardiovascular and peripheral arterial diseases,3–7 new and enhanced methods for cell isolation, expansion, and characterization are critically important to improve regenerative outcomes.

Indeed, the rarity of circulating EPCs remains a major hurdle toward successful and wider clinical application using autologous cells. The MNC fraction from PB contains primarily lineage‐committed lymphoid and myeloid cells and a very small percentage of CD34+ or CD133+ stem/progenitor cells. Accordingly, attempts have been made to mobilize EPCs into PB with repeated administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) followed by apheresis, a common practice in the setting of BM transplantation. Although several clinical trials of tissue regeneration have been completed with progenitors harvested from PB following G‐CSF injection, successful expansion of EPCs from PB would be a preferable approach to circumvent the need for G‐CSF therapy. Moreover, although BM harvest is a minimally invasive procedure, phlebotomy for PB is less expensive and tolerated better by patients.

In this issue of JAHA, Masuda and colleagues8 report successful enrichment of EPCs from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) using a quality and quantity culture (QQc) method and salvage of ischemic limbs in mice with injection of expanded cells. Culture of PBMNCs in QQc medium for 7 days resulted in a 19‐fold increase in definitive EPC (dEPC) colony‐forming cells, despite a ≈50% reduction in total number of cells. Moreover, these primed dEPCs showed a 2.7‐fold greater endothelial differentiation potential. The frequency of dEPC colony‐forming cells correlated positively with the primitive EPC (pEPC) colony‐forming cells in PBMNCs, indicating that the QQc method effectively transitioned the pEPC colony‐forming cells into dEPC colony‐forming cells with increased potential for new vessel formation. Quality and quantity cultured mononuclear cells (QQMNCs) also expressed greater levels of mRNA for angiogenic molecules, including insulin‐like growth factor‐1 and interleukin (IL)‐8, supporting the efficacy of QQc in inducing a vasculogenic phenotype in PBMNCs. Consistent with these favorable alterations in MNC phenotype, the injection of QQMNCs improved limb salvage following hindlimb ischemia in mice.8 Multimodality assessments showed increased perfusion, angiogenesis, and myogenesis and reduced fibrosis in QQMNC‐treated mice. Important from a therapeutic standpoint, compared with G‐CSF–mobilized CD34+ cell transplantation, QQMNC injection led to equal or greater improvement in outcomes in the setting of hindlimb ischemia.

With growing clinical need for EPCs in large numbers, various methods of enrichment and expansion have been developed by different laboratories for EPCs with diverse cellular phenotypes. Consistent with an endothelial or angiogenic theme, the culture medium for this purpose usually contains an endothelial medium (eg, endothelial basal medium‐29 and endothelial growth medium‐210–11) with or without serum and angiogenic growth factors. These factors usually include varying combinations and concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor‐B, insulin‐like growth factor‐1, epidermal growth factor, hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and heparin.10,12 Somewhat differently, the QQc medium used in this study by Masuda et al8 contained Stemline® II (Sigma‐Aldrich), a hematopoietic stem cell expansion medium, which did not contain any cytokine or serum. In addition to the angiogenic molecule vascular endothelial growth factor, the supplements in QQc medium included stem cell factor, thrombopoietin, IL‐6, and Flt‐3 ligand, molecules that are known to play important roles in the regulation of hematopoiesis and have been used extensively for expansion of cord blood– or peripheral blood–derived CD34+ cells.13–15 The success of this largely hematopoietic cocktail was documented by a nearly 6‐fold increase in CD34+ cells and a 3.5‐fold increase in CD133+ cells in QQMNCs after 7 days of culture.

Interestingly, careful phenotypic characterization of cultured cells in the current study also revealed that QQc could promote an antiinflammatory phenotype in MNCs. Specifically, gene expression of the proinflammatory cytokine IL‐1β was lower and expression of the antiinflammatory molecule IL‐10 was higher in QQMNCs. Further, QQc increased the proportion of CD206+ alternatively activated M2 macrophages with antiinflammatory properties by 5‐fold and reduced the CCR2+ classical M1 population known to exert proinflammatory effects. Importantly, QQc also induced a decrease in CD19+ lymphoid B cells and CD56+ natural killer cells, while inducing a nearly 6‐fold increase in both CD4+/interferon‐γ–/IL‐4+ T helper 2 (Th2) type T cells and regulatory T cells in response to phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate and ionomycin. Considering the prominent roles played by regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, and other immune cell subsets in transplant tolerance,16–17 these changes in immunological composition of MNCs have profound implications for survival of transplanted EPCs, especially in the context of allogeneic off‐the‐shelf products.

While the molecular regulation of immune cells and inflammation in vivo is extremely complex, the ingredients of this QQc medium may potentially exert antiinflammatory and immune‐tolerant actions by altering the T helper 1 (Th1)/Th2 cell balance. In this regard, IL‐6 has been shown to promote the generation of the Th2 subset,18 and human PBMNCs produce Th2 cytokines in response to vascular endothelial growth factor.19 In humans, Flt‐3 ligand increases both CD11c+ and CD11c– dendritic cells,20 which promote the generation of Th1 and Th2 cytokines, respectively. Moreover, recent evidence indicates that Th1 cytokines induce classical M1 macrophage activation, while Th2 cytokines favor the M2 characteristics. Thus, IL‐6 and stem cell factor, components of the QQc medium, may favorably modulate the activation of macrophages,21–22 which may serve to quench inflammation and promote tissue repair in an ischemic milieu in vivo. Nonetheless, to further improve this culture technology, the precise molecular signaling that produces these phenotypic shifts in QQMNCs should be elucidated in greater detail in future studies. Whether adding other agents known to augment antiinflammatory attributes of EPCs23 to QQc medium would further enhance its efficacy should also be explored. Finally, there remains a possibility that the current in vivo data with human cells in athymic mice that are unable to produce T cells may not faithfully predict the results of QQMNC transplantation in immunocompetent human recipients. Additional in vitro characterization of immunogenicity of QQMNCs and in vivo testing in relevant preclinical models will be prudent before clinical translation.

The formulation of a serum‐free culture process that transforms human PBMNCs into vasculogenic cells has major translational relevance. In conjunction with the authors' previous report with umbilical cord blood–derived CD133+ cells,24 the current observations support the efficacy of the QQc method to produce vasculogenic cells from multiple sources with a significant increase in dEPC colonies and the induction of an antiinflammatory and immune‐tolerant phenotype in expanded cells. These results also indicate that after in vivo transplantation, QQc products are able to improve outcomes in the setting of myocardial infarction24 as well as limb ischemia.8 If replicated successfully in clinical trials, the QQc method may lead to a cellular product that will effectively alleviate ischemic diseases in humans, fulfilling the primary goal of regenerative research.

Sources of Funding

This publication was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant R01 HL‐117730.

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275:964-967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia‐ and cytokine‐induced mobilization of bone marrow‐derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5:434-438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tateishi‐Yuyama E, Matsubara H, Murohara T, Ikeda U, Shintani S, Masaki H, Amano K, Kishimoto Y, Yoshimoto K, Akashi H, Shimada K, Iwasaka T, Imaizumi TTherapeutic Angiogenesis using Cell Transplantation Study I. Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone‐marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360:427-435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, Grunwald F, Aicher A, Urbich C, Martin H, Hoelzer D, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction (TOPCARE‐AMI). Circulation. 2002; 106:3009-3017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lenk K, Adams V, Lurz P, Erbs S, Linke A, Gielen S, Schmidt A, Scheinert D, Biamino G, Emmrich F, Schuler G, Hambrecht R. Therapeutical potential of blood‐derived progenitor cells in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and critical limb ischaemia. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26:1903-1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kawamoto A, Katayama M, Handa N, Kinoshita M, Takano H, Horii M, Sadamoto K, Yokoyama A, Yamanaka T, Onodera R, Kuroda A, Baba R, Kaneko Y, Tsukie T, Kurimoto Y, Okada Y, Kihara Y, Morioka S, Fukushima M, Asahara T. Intramuscular transplantation of G‐CSF‐mobilized CD34(+) cells in patients with critical limb ischemia: a phase I/IIa, multicenter, single‐blinded, dose‐escalation clinical trial. Stem Cells. 2009; 27:2857-2864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Losordo DW, Henry TD, Davidson C, Sup Lee J, Costa MA, Bass T, Mendelsohn F, Fortuin FD, Pepine CJ, Traverse JH, Amrani D, Ewenstein BM, Riedel N, Story K, Barker K, Povsic TJ, Harrington RA, Schatz RAInvestigators AC. Intramyocardial, autologous CD34+ cell therapy for refractory angina. Circ Res. 2011; 109:428-436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Masuda H, Tanaka R, Fujimura S, Ishikawa M, Akimaru H, Shizuno T, Sato A, Okada Y, Iida Y, Itoh J, Itoh Y, Kamiguchi H, Kawamoto A, Asahara T. Vasculogenic conditioning of peripheral blood mononuclear cells promotes endothelial progenitor cell expansion and phenotype transition of anti‐inflammatory macrophage and T lymphocyte to cells with regenerative potential. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3:e00074310.1161/JAHA.113.000743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, Yamaguchi JI, Uchida S, Masuda H, Silver M, Ma H, Kearney M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001; 103:634-637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hur J, Yoon CH, Kim HS, Choi JH, Kang HJ, Hwang KK, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB. Characterization of two types of endothelial progenitor cells and their different contributions to neovasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24:288-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ingram DA, Mead LE, Tanaka H, Meade V, Fenoglio A, Mortell K, Pollok K, Ferkowicz MJ, Gilley D, Yoder MC. Identification of a novel hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells using human peripheral and umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2004; 104:2752-2760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ott I, Keller U, Knoedler M, Gotze KS, Doss K, Fischer P, Urlbauer K, Debus G, von Bubnoff N, Rudelius M, Schomig A, Peschel C, Oostendorp RA. Endothelial‐like cells expanded from CD34+ blood cells improve left ventricular function after experimental myocardial infarction. FASEB J. 2005; 19:992-994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brugger W, Mocklin W, Heimfeld S, Berenson RJ, Mertelsmann R, Kanz L. Ex vivo expansion of enriched peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells by stem cell factor, interleukin‐1 beta (IL‐1 beta), IL‐6, IL‐3, interferon‐gamma, and erythropoietin. Blood. 1993; 81:2579-2584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Piacibello W, Sanavio F, Garetto L, Severino A, Bergandi D, Ferrario J, Fagioli F, Berger M, Aglietta M. Extensive amplification and self‐renewal of human primitive hematopoietic stem cells from cord blood. Blood. 1997; 89:2644-2653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heike T, Nakahata T. Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells by cytokines. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1592:313-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kohrt HE, Pillai AB, Lowsky R, Strober S. NKT cells, treg, and their interactions in bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Immunol. 2010; 40:1862-1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schneidawind D, Pierini A, Negrin RS. Regulatory T cells and natural killer T cells for modulation of GVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2013; 122:3116-3121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rincon M, Anguita J, Nakamura T, Fikrig E, Flavell RA. Interleukin (IL)‐6 directs the differentiation of IL‐4‐producing CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med. 1997; 185:461-469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nevala WK, Vachon CM, Leontovich AA, Scott CG, Thompson MA, Markovic SNMelanoma Study Group of the Mayo Clinic Cancer C. Evidence of systemic Th2‐driven chronic inflammation in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15:1931-1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pulendran B, Banchereau J, Burkeholder S, Kraus E, Guinet E, Chalouni C, Caron D, Maliszewski C, Davoust J, Fay J, Palucka K. Flt3‐ligand and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor mobilize distinct human dendritic cell subsets in vivo. J Immunol. 2000; 165:566-572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chomarat P, Banchereau J, Davoust J, Palucka AK. IL‐6 switches the differentiation of monocytes from dendritic cells to macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2000; 1:510-514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clanchy FI, Hamilton JA. The development of macrophages from human CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells in serum‐free cultures is optimized by IL‐3 and SCF. Cytokine. 2013; 61:33-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fadini GP, Albiero M, Boscaro E, Menegazzo L, Cabrelle A, Piliego T, Federici M, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Rosuvastatin stimulates clonogenic potential and anti‐inflammatory properties of endothelial progenitor cells. Cell Biol Int. 2010; 34:709-715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Masuda H, Iwasaki H, Kawamoto A, Akimaru H, Ishikawa M, Ii M, Shizuno T, Sato A, Ito R, Horii M, Ishida H, Kato S, Asahara T. Development of serum‐free quality and quantity control culture of colony‐forming endothelial progenitor cell for vasculogenesis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012; 1:160-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES