Skip to main content
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease logoLink to Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
. 2014 Jun 19;3(3):e000976. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000976

DNA Methylation is Developmentally Regulated for Genes Essential for Cardiogenesis

Alyssa A Chamberlain 5, Mingyan Lin 5, Rolanda L Lister 6, Alex A Maslov 5, Yidong Wang 5, Masako Suzuki 5, Bingruo Wu 5, John M Greally 1,2,5, Deyou Zheng 3,4,5, Bin Zhou 7,8
PMCID: PMC4309105  PMID: 24947998

Abstract

Background

DNA methylation is a major epigenetic mechanism altering gene expression in development and disease. However, its role in the regulation of gene expression during heart development is incompletely understood. The aim of this study is to reveal DNA methylation in mouse embryonic hearts and its role in regulating gene expression during heart development.

Methods and Results

We performed the genome‐wide DNA methylation profiling of mouse embryonic hearts using methyl‐sensitive, tiny fragment enrichment/massively parallel sequencing to determine methylation levels at ACGT sites. The results showed that while global methylation of 1.64 million ACGT sites in developing hearts remains stable between embryonic day (E) 11.5 and E14.5, a small fraction (2901) of them exhibit differential methylation. Gene Ontology analysis revealed that these sites are enriched at genes involved in heart development. Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis of 350 genes with differential DNA methylation showed that the expression of 181 genes is developmentally regulated, and 79 genes have correlative changes between methylation and expression, including hyaluronan synthase 2 (Has2). Required for heart valve formation, Has2 expression in the developing heart valves is downregulated at E14.5, accompanied with increased DNA methylation in its enhancer. Genetic knockout further showed that the downregulation of Has2 expression is dependent on DNA methyltransferase 3b, which is co‐expressed with Has2 in the forming heart valve region, indicating that the DNA methylation change may contribute to the Has2 enhancer's regulating function.

Conclusions

DNA methylation is developmentally regulated for genes essential to heart development, and abnormal DNA methylation may contribute to congenital heart disease.

Keywords: DNA methylation, DNA methyltransferase 3b, gene expression, heart development, hyaluronan synthase 2

Introduction

The heart is the first organ to develop during embryogenesis. In the developing mouse heart, between embryonic day (E) 11.5 and E14.5, cardiac cells undergo differentiation, migration, and proliferation driving cardiac tissue morphogenic events including chamber septation, heart valve formation, myocardial compaction, and coronary vessel formation, all essential for proper heart development.14 These processes are directed by cardiac transcriptional programs and endocardial‐myocardial molecular signalings.58 Both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms have been shown to control the expression of cardiac genes in a spatiotemporal manner during heart development.913

Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone modification, regulate gene expression by changing the local chromatin structure, thus altering the interaction of chromatin and DNA‐binding proteins, such as the binding of transcription activators and repressors to gene promoters and enhancers.1416 Different from genetic variation, epigenetic modifications regulate gene expression without altering the nucleotide sequence. In the case of DNA methylation, a methyl group is added to the carbon 5 of cytosine located at a CpG dinucleotide. It has been shown that DNA methylation is essential for gene regulation during development, especially that of tissue‐specific genes, and help to maintain cell and tissue identity.1719 Notably, with the exception of imprinted genes, the mammalian genome is stripped of its epigenetic modifications in early embryogenesis and the epigenome is then re‐established throughout embryonic development.2022

Globally, the patterns of DNA methylation acquired during embryogenesis remain stable throughout development and adulthood.19 However, changes in DNA methylation at individual loci do occur and can alter expression of genes with important biological functions in development and disease.2324 DNA methylation change also occurs in response to developmental perturbations, such as hypoxia. Altered levels of 5‐methylcytosine, either genome wide or at specific gene loci, have been related to increased disease susceptibility, and dysregulation of DNA methylation has been linked to cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes, and cancer.2426

Most studies on DNA methylation have focused on gametogenesis, development, disease, and stem cell function by demonstrating how it regulates gene expression and cell differentiation.23,2730 Few studies, however, have been devoted to understand the roles of DNA methylation in heart development. Determining the landscape of DNA methylation in this process is an essential step for understanding how DNA methylation regulates the cardiac genes essential for heart development.

Towards this end, we have applied a genome‐wide approach in this study to profile developmental changes in DNA methylation in mouse embryonic hearts between E11.5 and E14.5. The morphogenic events occurring during this developmental window are less well studied than early morphogenic events such as the differentiation of cardiac cells. The results show that while the DNA methylome is stable during development, differential methylation occurs at a small subset of genes highly associated with cardiac tissue differentiation and heart development and reveal a regulatory relationship between differential DNA methylation and cardiac essential gene expression. Thus, these results provide new information on the regulation of cardiac gene expression and heart development by DNA methylation.

Methods

Animals (Mice)

ICR wild‐type mice were bred in‐house for timed pregnancies. Noontime on the day of first observing vaginal plugs was designated as embryonic day (E) 0.5. For Dnmt3b knockout studies, endocardial specific Cre mice (Nfatc1Cre)9 were crossed with floxed Dnmt3b (DNA methyltransferase 3b) mice (obtained from The Jackson Laboratory) to delete Dnmt3b in heart valves. Conditional knockout (CKO) and control embryos were identified via PCR genotyping. All mouse experiments were performed according to the protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

Methyl Sensitive Tiny Fragment Enrichment/Massively Parallel Sequencing (MSFE/MPS)

Embryonic hearts from E11.5 or E14.5 were isolated from pregnant mice and non‐cardiac tissues were removed. Genomic DNA was extracted from 4 groups of pooled hearts as described previously.31 A total of 5 μg of extracted DNA from each group was used for a modified HELP‐tagging assay.32 We modified the original assay by replacing HpaII with HpyCH4IV, the restriction enzyme recognizing 5′‐ACGT‐3′ sites and sensitive to methylation at the CG. After HpyCH4IV digestion, the sequencing libraries were generated using the Ligation Mediated PCR Assay (LMPA).33 The generated libraries were submitted to the Epigenomics Shared Facility at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine for massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing was performed on individual libraries prepared from 2 biological replicates for each group. The quality of the sequencing results was determined by the parameters of length and peak value of sequence reads. The raw and processed data have been submitted to GEO (accession number: GSE55141).

Luminometric Methylation Assay to Validate the Global DNA Methylation

Global DNA methylation for each biological replicate, at both E11.5 and E14.5, was confirmed using the Luminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA) as described previously.3435 Genomic DNA was digested for 4 hours with HpyCH4IV and EcoRI, purified and pyrosequenced at the Einstein Genomics Core.

MassArray

Loci with differential methylation, ranging from 0% to 100% determined by the massively parallel sequencing, were randomly selected and validated using Sequenom's MassArray.36 Primers were designed using MethPrimer and T7 tags were added as per the Sequenom MassArray protocol (Table 1). Genomic DNA (0.6 μg) from 3 replicates (for technical validation) and 2 replicates (for experimental validation) was bisulfite converted using the Zymo Research EZ DNA Methylation Kit prior to amplification using the MassArray Primers. Amplified bisulfite‐converted genomic DNA was then subjected to MassArray on a Sequenom machine.

Table 1.

Loci and Primers (With T7 Tags, Lower Cases) for Initial Technical Validation by MassArray

ACGT Location Forward Primer With T7 Balance (Top) Reverse Primer With T7 Tag (Bottom)
Chr4 145913471 aggaagagagAGTTTTTATGTTTTTTGTAAGGTTATTTGA
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctCCAAACTCCTAATCCCAATCTAAC
Chr7 147043670 aggaagagagTTGGGGGTTTTTAATTAAGATAGTTT
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctTTCCCTCTAATATATCCCATTTTACC
Chr12 62103733 aggaagagagAGTATTAGGGTTAAGTATTGAATAAATTTA
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctAATCAAAATAAAAAATCAAAAAAAA
Chr11 4347732 aggaagagagTTTAGGTATATATTATTATATTTGATTTTT
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctAATTACCACAAAACCTAACAC
Chr2 38354047 aggaagagagAGAGTGGTATTTGTGTTAGAGAGGA
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctTTCCAAAAAAAACCAAAAAAAA
Chr6 64724205 aggaagagagTGTTTTTGTAATTTAGATAAGATTATTTTA
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctAATCACATATCACTAACCAAACAATATC
Chr2 165155478 aggaagagagGGGTGATAGGAAGTTGTAGAGATTAGA
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctAAAAAAACACTACCCAAACTTAAATAACA
Chr11 3036940 aggaagagagGGGTATTTGTTTAAGATATTTTTGATTTAT
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctACAATAACCAAATAAAAAACACACCA
Chr12 101338922 aggaagagagTGGTGTTTTAGTTGTTAAAATGTTATAGG
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctCAAAAATATTCCCCAAATATCAAAA
Chr18 55862932 aggaagagagTAGAAAAATAGGGAGAATGTGATATT
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctATATCTAACTTCCCTACACCCACTAAAA
Chr1 25839243 aggaagagagTTTTAGGATTGAATAAAATTTTAAGA
cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctATTTAATTTACTCATTCTCTCTATATAC

Individual sites representing 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% methylation, that were consistent between the 2 assayed samples, were chosen for validation by Sequenom's MassArray to generate a standard by which to make calls on methylation levels. Primers were designed using MethPrimer and T7 tags were added as per the Sequenom guide.

Bioinformatic Analysis to Profile Genome‐Wide DNA Methylation

The sequencing reads were aligned to the mouse genome (mm9) and the number of mapped reads with their 5′ ends starting at each ACGT site was recorded using the automated data analysis pipeline created by the Epigenomics Center and the Computational and Statistical Epigenomics Group at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.32,37 The read counts at individual ACGT sites from E11.5 and E14.5 were compared and sites with significantly different counts were determined by EdgeR, a Bioconductor package designed for analysis of count based genome‐wide sequencing data.38 The resultant sites were associated with genes if they were located to promoters, gene bodies, or within 50 kb of genes.

Gene Expression Analysis

Custom TaqMan Array 96‐Well Fast Plates (Applied Biosystems) were designed for candidate genes prioritized based on degree of differential methylation, function, and presence of multiple‐associated differentially methylated ACGT sites. RNA was extracted from pooled embryonic hearts from E11.5 or E14.5 (n=3 for each stage) and atrioventricular junctions isolated from 3 wild‐type or 3 CKO embryos at E11.5 and E14.5 using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed using the SuperScript II reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen). ΔCt values were calculated, normalizing to an endogenous control, and fold change was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.39

RNA In Situ Hybridization

RNA in situ hybridization for Has2 expression in E11.5 or E14.5 hearts was carried out as described previously.5

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out to determine expression of Dnmt3b in the developing heart using mouse monoclonal Dnmt3b antibody (Abcam 52A1018) (1:250), according to the Vector Labs mouse‐on‐mouse (M.O.M.) basic kit.

Statistical Analysis

Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the overall similarity of MSFE/MPS tag counts between E11.5 and E14.5 samples. A linear regression was used to fit the relationship between tag counts and DNA methylation levels at 14 selected ACGT sites. Differentially methylated (DM) sites were identified by the program EdgeR,38 with <5% FDR. A two‐sided t test was used to evaluate the difference of tag counts at ACGT sites located to different genomic contents, while hypergeometric test was used to evaluate the enrichment of DM sites in promoters and gene bodies. The statistical analysis of differential gene expression was performed using Microsoft Excel and the data were presented as mean±standard error (SE). Student t test was used for comparison between groups and P values <0.05 were considered as significant, Bonferonni's correction was applied to account for multiple testing in gene expression analysis. For the expression analysis of 350 genes, Mann–Whitney test was also performed (data not shown). While the significance observed for the top 15 up‐ and down‐regulated genes in Figure 5B remained, a few other differentially expressed genes included in Figure 5A would lose statistical support.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Expression changes for selected genes with differentially methylated sites. A, Gene expression analysis (n=3) of 350 differentially methylated genes between E11.5 and E14.5 showing that 181 genes are differentially expressed and 79 of those genes show consistent changes in DNA methylation. B, The top 15 upregulated genes (red) and downregulated genes (green) in E14.5. The solid and open triangles mark differentially methylated sites in regulatory regions (promoter proximal or distal) and gene bodies, respectively. The up and down directions of triangles indicate increased and decreased methylation, respectively.

Results

Global DNA Methylation is Stable in the Developing Heart

To study the importance of DNA methylation in heart development, we carried out a genome‐wide cytosine methylation analysis of E11.5 and E14.5 mouse embryonic hearts using MSFE/MPS with HpyCH4IV, a methylation‐sensitive restriction enzyme recognizing ACGT. A total of 75 278 236 and 28 496 681 sequencing reads were obtained from the 2 E11.5 replicates that were mapped to 1 522 872 and 1 447 993 ACGT sites, respectively, while 89 562 687 and 65 198 805 reads were generated from the 2 E14.5 replicates that were mapped to 1 442 766 and 1 490 463 sites, respectively. At both stages, the reads from the 2 replicates covered >83% of the total 1 756 340 ACGT sites in the mouse genome. The Pearson's correlation coefficients were 0.894 and 0.896 between the 2 replicates for E11.5 and E14.5, respectively (data not shown); indicating that the quality of the data was high. The majority of ACGT sites had highly similar and correlated tag counts between E11.5 and E14.5 (Figure 1A), suggesting at the global level no significant methylation changes occurred between the 2 developmental stages. This finding of genome‐wide stable DNA methylation in the developing hearts was supported by the LUMA data (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Limited DNA methylation changes between E11.5 and E14.5 hearts. A, The tag counts for all ACGT sites in E11.5 (x‐axis) and E14.5 (y‐axis) are highly correlated. The depth of the color represents the density of points in a plotting area (n=2). B, Confirmation of stable global methylation by Luminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA) (n=2). Error bars represent standard error.

Differential DNA Methylation Occurs Locally in the Developing Heart

We then catalogued the ACGT sites into genic sites (−50 kb of transcription start sites [TSS] to +0.5 kb of transcription end sites [TES] and intergenic sites) (Figure 2A), with the former further separated into 3 types: promoter proximal sites (−5 kb to +0.5 kb of TSS), gene body sites (+0.5 kb of TSS to TES), and promoter distal or enhancer sites (Figure 2B, top panel), and also determined the distribution of ACGT tag counts across the genome by intersecting the genome‐wide ACGT methylation profiles with several genomic features, including CpG islands, CTCF‐binding sites, RefSeq genes, repetitive elements, and regulatory elements (Figure 2B, bottom panel). The gene annotation, CpG islands, and repeats were downloaded from the UCSC browser. Additionally, lists of regulatory elements for embryonic hearts were obtained from previous studies, including 3596 P300 binding sites identified for E11.5 hearts, 69 073 P300‐marked enhancers, 14 874 CTCF sites, and 45 981 regions with the H3K27ac modification (a histone mark for active enhancer) for E14.5.4042

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of DNA methylation across the mouse genome and various types of genomic elements in the developing heart. A, Cartoon depicting the genic regions (enhancer, promoter and genebody). B, Violin plot (a combination of a box plot and a kernel density plot) showing the distributions of tag counts for all ACGT (top) or differential methylated (bottom) sites in different genomic regions. As number of tag counts is inversely correlated to level of CG methylation, these plots indicate that gene promoters and regulatory regions exhibit significantly lower levels of DNA methylation than genomic background, and repetitive sequences are highly methylated. Plots in orange and yellow are for data from E11.5 and E14.5, respectively. TES indicates transcription end sites; TSS, transcription start sites.

The results showed that gene promoters and regulatory regions, represented by either CpG islands or enhancers (defined by P300 occupancy in E11.5 or H3K27ac enrichment in E14.5) had significantly lower levels of DNA methylation than genomic background, as ACGT sites within these regions had increased numbers of tag counts (P<2.2e‐16, t test). Similarly, CTCF‐binding sites generally have low levels of methylation. This is consistent with previous reports that CTCF is associated with hypomethylated regions.43 In contrast, repetitive regions showed significantly higher levels of DNA methylation, as ACGT sites in these regions had decreased numbers of tag counts (P<2.2e‐16, t test). Unexpectedly, the E14.5 cardiac enhancers exhibited higher DNA methylation than the elements marked by either P300 or H3K27ac at E14.5 (Figure 2B). This is probably due to the fact that those enhancers were identified based largely on H3K4me1 modifications, which is enriched in both active and poised enhancers.4445

Next, we chose up to 14 ACGT sites with a range of different tag counts, representing 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% methylation by massively parallel sequencing, and determined their levels of methylation by MassArray. The results indicated that tag count was inversely correlated with the percentage of cytosine methylation (Figure 3A), thereby confirming the precision of the MSFE/MPS in quantifying methylation level, ie, tag counts measured accurately both the global and regional DNA methylation. We then set out to investigate how much methylation changed in the developing hearts between E11.5 and E14.5. After normalization by sequencing depths, ACGT sites with at least 1 sequencing tag in any of the 4 samples were evaluated for differential methylation using 2 complementary approaches. We used EdgeR, which modeled the tag counts by a negative binomial distribution, to determine ACGT sites that showed differential methylation. The result indicated that the majority of the ACGT sites were not differentially methylated in the developing hearts between the 2 stages, as <1% of sites were found to have different tags (nominal P value <0.05) (Figure 3B). Among the small fraction (2901) of the ≈1.64 million analyzed ACGT sites that were differentially methylated, 1946 (67.1%) and 955 (32.9%) sites exhibited increased and decreased methylation in the late stage hearts, respectively (FDR<0.05) (Figure 3C).38 Of note, for the majority of these sites, the degree of difference was <50%, with no sites switching from a fully methylated to an unmethylated state.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Analysis of the level of DNA methylation and differential methylation in the developing mouse heart. A, Methyl sensitive tiny fragment enrichment/massively parallel sequencing (MSFE/MPS) accurately detects levels of methylation as confirmed by Sequenom's MassArray of analyzed sites representing 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% methylation determined by MSFE/MPS. B, Distribution of all ACGT sites with different numbers of tag counts from MSFE/MPS analysis. C, Violin plots showing the difference in tag counts for the 2901 ACGT sites that were significantly differentially methylated between E11.5 and E14.5. D, The distribution of all and differentially methylated (DM) ACGT sites in relation to gene annotation.

We also compared the percentage of differentially methylated ACGT sites at various genic and intergenic regions with the percentage of the total analyzed ACGT sites located within the same defined regions. We found that the differentially methylated sites were significantly enriched in gene bodies (P<2.2e‐16, hypergeometric test), as 51.6% of the differentially methylated sites versus 42.2% of all assayed sites were located to gene bodies (Figure 3D). On the contrary, differentially methylated ACGT sites were under‐represented in promoter (4.6%) and enhancer sites (13.9%), while 6.4% and 16.7% of all ACGT sites were in promoter‐proximal and enhancer regions, respectively. In total, 2032 (70%) of the 2901 sites were associated with genes, with 65.1% of them showing increased methylation at E14.5.

Differential DNA Methylation in the Developing Heart Links to Heart Development

To investigate the functional importance of the small set of genes exhibiting differential methylation, we used the software GREAT to characterize the 2901 differentially methylated sites for their potential regulatory roles. Of the only 7 significantly associated gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes returned by GREAT, 4 of them were related to heart development and cardiac tissue growth (Figure 4), indicating a significant enrichment of cardiac essential genes that have differential DNA methylation during heart development. These genes include Erbb4, Gata6, Foxp1, Fgf2, Fgf9, Has2, Invs, Mef2c, Robo2, and Wnt2. For example, Foxp1 is important in cardiomyocyte proliferation,42,46 while signaling from Gata6 to Wnt2 plays an important role in early cardiogenesis and inflow tract development,4748 Mef2c plays an essential role in heart development as a regulator of cardiac myogenesis within the right ventricle,4950 and Has2 plays a role in heart valve development.6,51 GREAT also reported that the affected genes were highly expressed in the cardiovascular system (P=5.3e‐5) and they were implicated in vascular disease (P=1.4e‐4) based on an analysis of Disease Ontology.52

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Gene ontology (GO) terms for the genes with differential DNA methylation during heart development. The software GREAT was used to characterize the 2901 differentially methylated sites for function. Four of the only 7 GO terms returned are involved in heart development and cardiac tissue growth.

Differential DNA Methylation Corresponds to Changes in Gene Expression in the Developing Heart

To directly test how the observed differential DNA methylation is related to gene expression changes in the developing heart, we picked 350 genes from the 1697 genes linked to the 2901 differentially methylated sites and performed qPCR to determine their expression levels in E11.5 and E14.5 hearts. These genes were chosen because they contained ACGT sites with a ≥50% change in methylation between the 2 stages, their known function (such as roles in embryonic development preferentially heart development), and/or presence of multiple differentially methylated sites. Change in mRNA level was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method and genes were ranked based on fold change.39 Of the 350 genes assayed in the gene expression analysis, 181 (51.7%) genes, including Erbb4, Has2, Invs, Robo2, and Vegfc, were differentially expressed between E11.5 and E14.5 (>1.2‐fold change and P<0.05; adjusted for multiple testing), and among these, expression of 55 genes was upregulated whereas expression of 126 genes was downregulated (Figure 5A, Table 2).

Table 2.

List of Genes With Differential Expression and Methylation

Gene Name ACGT Chr Location Region % DM Fold Change Function
AI661453 Chr17 47582589 Genebody 74%** −2.02 Cellular component
Acaca Chr11 84088161 Genebody 73%** −2.01 Long chain fatty acid biogenesis
Abi1 Chr2 22839713 Genebody 73%** −2.03 Negative regulation of cell growth and transformation, Ras signaling, Cardiovascular and placental development
Aff2 ChrX 66755393 Genebody 70%* −2.02 RNA‐binding protein
Atf6 Chr1 172773438 Genebody 79%* −2.00 Unfolded protein response during ER stress
Arhgef12 Chr9 42820787 Genebody 74%* −2.02 Acts as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor
Ank Chr15 27482616 Genebody 59%** −2.03 Osteoblast/osteoclast differentiation, hypoxia responsive/regulated by Hif1α
Ank Chr15 27513341 Genebody 78%** −2.03
Ank Chr15 27427229 Genebody 21%* −2.03
Ank Chr15 27430132 Genebody 52% −2.03
Atrnl1 Chr19 58000444 Genebody 84%** −4.06 G‐protein coupled receptor signaling, may regulate energy homeostasis
Atrnl1 Chr19 57683177 Promoter 29% −4.06
Atrnl1 Chr19 58054451 Genebody 35% −4.06
Atxn1 Chr13 45770455 Genebody 67%** −2.02 Chromatin binding factor that represses Notch signaling.
Brdt Chr5 107807029 Genebody 75%** −2.00 Chromocenter organization, Spermatogenesis
Cacna2d3 Chr14 30485237 Genebody 74%** −2.03 Voltage‐gated calcium channel activity, Regulated by promoter methylation, contractility of ventricular myocytes
Cacna2d3 Chr14 30303225 Genebody 22% −2.03
Cd180 Chr13 103491174 Genebody 66%* −2.00 Innate immune response, life/death decision of B‐cells
Cdk14 Chr5 4822015 Genebody 76%** −4.07 Cell cycle regulation
Cdk14 Chr5 5428041 Enhancer 23% −4.07
Casz1 Chr4 148329448 Enhancer 80%** −2.00 Blood vessel development and lumen morphogenesis, differentially methylated in a tissue specific manner
Cdh4 Chr2 179440423 Genebody 75%** −2.01 Calcium dependent cell adhesion, may play a role in retinal development, Regulated by methylation
Cdh4 Chr2 179292446 Genebody 22% −2.01
Cdh4 Chr2 179316146 Genebody 21% −2.01
Cdh4 Chr2 179385054 Genebody 19%* −2.01
Clasp1 Chr1 120296717 Genebody 75% −2.03 Regulation of microtubule dynamics, mitosis
Chrna9 Chr5 66367625 Genebody 71%** −1.94 Ion transport, cochlea hair development
Chrna9 Chr5 66348791 Enhancer 20%** −1.94
Col9a1 Chr1 24203890 Genebody 63%** −2.02 Expressed in developing heart, differentially methylated in cancer
Clasp2 Chr9 113641090 Enhancer 69%** −2.02 Microtubule stabilization, mitosis
Creb1 Chr1 64569233 Enhancer 81%** −2.02 Gene transcription, HIF‐1‐alpha transcription factor network
D6Wsu116e Chr6 116164345 Genebody 76%** −4.05 N/A
Csde1 Chr3 102840451 Genebody 59%** −2.00 RNA binding and transcriptionally coupled mRNA turnover
Disc1 Chr8 127751886 Genebody 78%** −2.02 Multiple roles in embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Associated with schizophrenia
Dach2 ChrX 110423200 Genebody 65%** −2.04 Eye and limb development and sex determination
Dgkb Chr12 38744479 Genebody 73%** −1.88 Brain development
Dnajc11 Chr4 151311759 Genebody 78%** −2.03 Heat shock binding protein
Dlx5 Chr6 6859827 Enhancer 77%* −2.03 Transcriptional activator during bone development, Promotes cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation. Cell type specific expression regulated by methylation
Dnajc2 Chr5 21291210 Promoter 69%** 2.00 DNA replication
Dlg2 Chr7 99358525 Genebody 60%** −2.00 Regulation of synaptic stability, Chronic pain perception
Eif2ak4 Chr2 118271831 Genebody 86%* −2.01 Hypoxia response
Emilin2 Chr17 71603514 Genebody 78%** −4.05 Extracellular matrix component, regulates methylation in breast cancer
Emilin2 Chr17 71606328 Genebody 74%** −4.05
Fam73a Chr3 151956508 Genebody 81%** −2.01 Integral to membrane
Fam111a Chr19 12661528 Genebody 78%** −2.02 Simian virus 40 (SV40) host range restriction factor
Fbxw7 Chr3 84630582 Genebody 77** −2.00 Mediates ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of target proteins including NOTCH1, inactivated by promoter hypermethylation
Fancl Chr11 26311200 Genebody 73%* −2.04 Mediates monoubiquitination, may play a role in primordial germ cell proliferation
Fancl Chr11 26368061 Genebody 96%* −2.04
Fbxw8 Chr5 118558780 Genebody 92%* −2.02 Mediates ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of target proteins, placental development
Ftsjd2 Chr17 29820177 Genebody 67%** −2.01 Methyltransferase that mediates mRNA cap1
Fscn1 Chr5 143721993 Promoter 67%* −2.03 Cell migration, motility, adhesion and cellular interactions
Has2 Chr15 56549727 Enhancer 65%* −16.31 Heart valve development
Grik4 Chr9 42754379 Promoter 79%* −2.04 Glutamate receptor in CNS
Invs Chr4 48429137 Genebody 67%** −4.05 Embryonic heart tube left development and right pattern formation
Invs Chr4 48288832 Promoter 24%* −4.05
Il6st Chr13 113256622 Genebody 77%* −2.01 Signal transduction. Plays a role in embryonic development, vascular endothelial growth
Hipk2 Chr6 38796532 Genebody 61%* −2.00 Angiogenesis, marked for degradation by hif1‐a in cancer
Itgb1 Chr8 131241575 Genebody 78%** −2.03 Promotes endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis, Hif1 regulated in wound healing
Itsn1 Chr16 91786820 Genebody 79%* −2.02 Adaptor protein linking endocytic membrane traffic and actin assembly machinery
Isg20 Chr7 86061520 Genebody 62%** 3.97 Viral response
Itga1 Chr13 115765151 Genebody 66%** −2.04 Integrin and Collagen Binding, rapid methylation leading to initiation of megakaryocyte differentiation
Itga1 Chr13 115800600 Genebody 20%** −2.04
Kcne4 Chr1 78770239 Enhancer 77%** 7.87 Potassium voltage channel, cardiac function (cardiomyopathy)
Kif26b Chr1 180479937 Genebody 81%** −2.00 Embryonic kidney development, plays a role in compact adhesion between mesenchymal cells
Klhl2 Chr8 67366115 Genebody 76%* −2.02 Mediate ubiquitination of target proteins, Plays a role in the reorganization of actin cytoskeleton
Ksr1 Chr11 79001767 Enhancer 82%** −2.04 Promotes MEK and RAF phosphorylation and activity
Ksr1 Chr11 78904857 Genebody 20% −2.04
Limk1 Chr5 135156130 Genebody 80%* −2.04 Regulation of actin filament dynamics, cell motility, cell cycle progression and differentiation
Lmf1 Chr17 25771254 Genebody 82%** −2.04 Maturation and transport of lipoprotein lipase through the secretory pathway
Mkrn2 Chr6 115567892 Genebody 62%* 2.01 Neurogenesis
Ncoa7 Chr10 30373619 Genebody 75%** 2.02 Co‐activation of several nuclear receptors
Ncam1 Chr9 49570879 Genebody 61%* 4.06 Neural adhesion, pathological angiogenesis in oxygen induced retinopathy, ventricular wall thickening in hypertension, cardiac protection
Odz3 Chr8 49397492 Genebody 73%** −2.00 Signal transduction, neuronal growth and tumorigenesis
Odz3 Chr8 49336206 Genebody 47%** −2.00
Odz3 Chr8 49341811 Genebody 21% −2.00
Pam Chr1 99716878 Enhancer 79%** 4.07 Heart development and hypoxia response
Pde5a Chr3 122538715 Genebody 79** 2.02 Signal transduction, cardiac muscle contraction and hypertrophy, hypoxia response
Pde11a Chr2 75840713 Genebody 70%* 1.98 Signal transduction, may play a role in vascular smooth muscle proliferation and contraction, cardiac contractility and immune cell activation
Pcgf5 Chr19 36450106 Promoter 71%* 2.02 Maintenance of transcriptional repressive state in development, including that of Hox genes
Pfkfb3 Chr2 11406131 Genebody 78%** 2.03 Induced by Hif1α
Pet112 l Chr3 85403998 Genebody 70%* 2.03 Glutamyl‐tRNA amidotransferase complex, Functions in mitochondria
Pip5k1b Chr19 24602322 Genebody 72%** 4.06 Phosphorylation
Pnkd Chr1 74336698 Genebody 65%** 2.00 Hydrolase activity, Plays an aggregative role in the development of cardiac hypertrophy via NF‐kappa‐B signaling
Pou2f1 Chr1 167866210 Promoter 70%** −2.01 Regulates gene expression in response to stress and metabolic signals
Ppm1 h Chr10 122245574 Genebody 67% 4.05 Phosphatase activity, drug response in cancer, associated with systemic lupus erythematosus
Ppm1 h Chr10 122144175 Genebody 19%** 4.05
Prdm16 Chr4 153999781 Genebody 68%** 2.02 Transcriptional regulation, Functions as a repressor of TGF‐beta signaling
Ppwd1 Chr13 104995653 Genebody 67%** 2.02 Putative peptidylprolyl isomerase, may be involved in pre‐mRNA splicing
Ptn Chr6 36663240 Enhancer 75%** 4.07 Angiogenesis, tumorigenesis, regulation of hematopoietic stem cell self renewal, mammary gland development
Prmt8 Chr6 127665685 Genebody 79%* −2.07 Arginine methyltransferase, embryonic and neural development, regulated by auto‐methylation
Prkca Chr11 108120704 Genebody 86%** 2.00 Regulation of transcription, cell growth, immune response, negative regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, cardiac hypertrophy and angiogenesis
Ranbp3 Chr17 56833581 Genebody 78%* 2.02 Nuclear export, negative regulator of TGF‐beta signaling through SMAD
Ptpro Chr6 137362114 Genebody 71%** 2.00 Wnt‐protein binding, Candidate tumor suppressor, aberrantly methylated in cancer
Ptpru Chr4 131336827 Genebody 69%** 1.84 Cell proliferation and migration, maintenance of epithelial integrity, neural development and possible megakaryocytopoiesis
Rbfox3 Chr11 118610022 Genebody 65%* 1.97 RNA‐binding, associated with neurocytoma and cerebral artery occlusion
Rhd Chr4 134418089 Promoter 81%** −8.00 Encodes member of Rh blood group proteins
Rbm39 Chr2 155977061 Genebody 75% 4.05 Transcriptional co‐activator for steroid nuclear receptors, involved in pre‐mRNA splicing
Rpia Chr6 70726365 Genebody 67%** 2.02 Carbohydrate metabolism
Robo2 Chr16 74182881 Genebody 72% −2.00 Heart Morphogenesis, linear hear tube formation, neuronal development
Rpn2 Chr2 157147564 Genebody 55%** 2.04 Ribosome binding, Dolichyl‐diphosphooligosaccharide‐protein glycotransferase activity
Rsu1 Chr2 13110936 Genebody 79%** 2.01 Ras signal transduction pathway
Rsu1 Chr2 13153759 Genebody 50%* 2.01
Rufy2 Chr10 62447503 Genebody 65% 2.03 Alzheimer's disease
Sav1 Chr12 71078443 Genebody 76%** 2.03 Transcription, cell proliferation, cell death, cell migration, cell cycle exit, protein degradation and RNA splicing
Slc24a2 Chr4 86672633 Genebody 58%** 2.03 Calcium and potassium transport
Slmap Chr14 27308224 Genebody 79% 4.07 Myoblast fusion
Slco5a1 Chr1 12939917 Genebody 61% −1.97 Transporter activity
Sorbs2 Chr8 46655637 Genebody 79%** 2.02 Cytoskeletal adaptor activity and structural constituent of cytoskeleton
Sorbs2 Chr8 46649975 Genebody 20% 2.02
Stxbp6 Chr12 46076554 Genebody 79%** 1.96 Regulates SNARE complex formation
St8sia5 Chr18 77402859 Enhancer 80%** 2.02 Synthesis of gangliosides
Srsf9 Chr5 115781199 Genebody 73% 2.03 Splicing
Tex9 Chr9 72307706 Genebody 67%** 2.02
Tbc1d16 Chr11 119004863 Genebody 64%** 1.99 Rab GTPase activator activity
Tbc1d16 Chr11 119017735 Genebody 76%** 1.99
Taf4a Chr2 179700219 Genebody 72%** 2.01 Basal transcription
Tet2 Chr3 133187569 Genebody 85%** 2.01 DNA demethylation regulating transcription
Tmem38a Chr8 75105110 Genebody 69%** 4.06 Potassium channel activity
Tnrc6a Chr7 130306203 Genebody 73%** 2.02 Gene silencing by RNA and microRNA
Tmem135 Chr7 96306156 Genebody 82%* 2.02 Peroxisome organization
Tmem135 Chr7 96397839 Genebody 29% 2.02
Tubg2 Chr11 101015396 Promoter 19% −2.01 Major constituent of microtubules, structural molecule activity
Vmn1r73 Chr7 12307910 Enhancer 63%** 2.00
Wnk1 Chr6 119946851 Genebody 86%** −1.98 Heart development, regulations of cell signaling, survival and proliferations, electrolyte homeostasis, cytoskeletal reorganization and sodium and chloride ion transport
Zbtb20 Chr16 43500263 Genebody 89%** −2.01 Transcription factor involved in hematopoiesis, oncogenesis and immune response
Zbtb20 Chr16 43219787 Enhancer 95% −2.01
Zbtb20 Chr16 43343231 Genebody 98% −2.01
Zbtb20 Chr16 43455368 Genebody 97% −2.01
Wnt6 Chr1 74821915 Genebody 65% −4.35 Tissue development
Zdhhc8 Chr16 18231749 Genebody 72% 4.00 Susceptibility to schizophrenia
Zfp385b Chr2 77445243 Genebody 73%* −2.02 Metal ion, nucleic acid, p53, and zinc ion binding, Apoptotic processes
Zfp385b Chr2 77629407 Genebody 21%* −2.02
Enah Chr1 183952945 Promoter 25% −2.01
Pkd2 Chr5 104885245 Promoter 22% 1.99 Tubular morphogenesis, associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Mylk2 Chr2 152734667 Promoter 20% −1.91 Cardiac function and global muscle contraction
Ppp1r1c Chr2 79544612 Promoter 25% −1.93 Promotes cell cycle progression and increases cell susceptibility to TNF‐induced apoptosis
Spns2 Chr11 72304383 Promoter 59%** −4.03 Migration of myocardial precursors; cardiovascular, immunological and neural development
Elf1 Chr14 79879478 Promoter 31% −4.05 Endothelial transcription factor
Ppp1r3c Chr19 36813263 Promoter 44% −2.01 Glycogen synthase, Regulated by Hif1α
Gucy1a3 Chr3 81943306 Genebody 23%** −2.02 Cardiac function, vascular smooth muscle function
Gucy1a3 Chr3 81993497 Enhancer 23%** −2.02
Ank2 Chr3 126729907 Enhancer 97% −2.01 Expression and targeting of SPTBN1 in neonatal cardiomyocytes and regulation of neonatal cardiomyocyte contraction rate
Sfrp2 Chr3 83534574 Enhancer 30% 8.05 Cell growth and differentiation, Wnt signaling, myogenesis and eye retinal development, methylation of gene is a potential marker for colorectal cancer
Erbb4 Chr1 68142043 Genebody 23% −4.04 Heart development, cardiac muscle differentiation and postnatal cardiomyocyte differentiation, CNS development, neural crest cell migration, gene transcription, cell proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis
Erbb4 Chr1 68846422 Genebody 20% −4.04
Erbb4 Chr1 68938673 Genebody 38% −4.04
Erbb4 Chr1 68954441 Genebody 20% −4.04
Erbb4 Chr1 69128731 Genebody 24% −4.04
Mysm1 Chr4 94660067 Enhancer 28%** −2.00 Histone modification and transcriptional co‐activation
Foxp1 Chr6 98892345 Genebody 19% −2.04 Cardiomyocyte proliferation
Foxp1 Chr6 99008217 Genebody 22%* −2.04
Foxp1 Chr6 99018432 Genebody 34% −2.04
Foxp1 Chr6 99163145 Genebody 20% −2.04
Foxp1 Chr6 99197140 Genebody 23% −2.04
Foxp1 Chr6 99357158 Genebody 22% −2.04
Foxp1 Chr6 99391693 Enhancer 43%* −2.04
Unc5c Chr3 141321392 Genebody 19% −8.07 Cell migration in neural development, axon extension and induction of apoptosis
Unc5c Chr3 141342275 Genebody 26% −8.07
Unc5c Chr3 141359065 Genebody 20% −8.07
Sox5 Chr6 143990289 Genebody 20% −4.01 Embryonic development, cell fate determination, transcriptional regulation
Sox5 Chr6 144141969 Genebody 19% −4.01
Psd3 Chr8 70278799 Genebody 19%* −2.03 Guanine nucleotide exchange factor for ARF6
Psd3 Chr8 70338543 Genebody 96% −2.03
Psd3 Chr8 70459139 Genebody 23%* −2.03
Dock1 Chr7 142059905 Genebody 28% −2.01 Cytoskeletal rearrangements necessary for phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and in cell motility Guanine nucleotide exchange factor
Dock1 Chr7 142061686 Genebody 19% −2.01
Dock1 Chr7 142073658 Genebody 30% −2.01
Dock1 Chr7 142115224 Genebody 24% −2.01
Dock1 Chr7 142136783 Genebody 24% −2.01
Dock1 Chr7 142190260 Genebody 53% −2.01
Wwox Chr8 117142250 Genebody 31% −2.03 Apoptosis, TGFB1 signaling and TGFB1‐mediated cell death. Inhibits Wnt signaling
Wwox Chr8 117354691 Genebody 26% −2.03
Wwox Chr8 117632214 Genebody 22% −2.03
Vegfc Chr8 55148115 Enhancer 21% 2.02 Angiogenesis and endothelial cell growth
Vegfc Chr8 55239360 Genebody 18.5%* 2.02
Vegfc Chr8 55247617 Genebody 22% 2.02
Pard3 Chr8 129591554 Genebody 28%* −2.00 Adaptor protein, asymmetrical cell division and cell polarization, plays a role in epithelial tight junctions
Pard3 Chr8 129640346 Genebody 96%** −2.00
Pard3 Chr8 129830952 Genebody 96% −2.00
Pard3 Chr8 129845627 Genebody 21%** −2.00
Pard3 Chr8 129875488 Genebody 22% −2.00
Pard3 Chr8 129914177 Genebody 24% −2.00
Thsd4 Chr9 59846658 Genebody 19%* −2.00 Attenuates TGFB signaling
Thsd4 Chr9 59968525 Genebody 22% −2.00
Thsd4 Chr9 60041974 Genebody 19%* −2.00
Thsd4 Chr9 60098887 Genebody 96%* −2.00
Rora Chr9 68624882 Genebody 19%** −2.01 Regulated genes involved in lipid metabolism
Rora Chr9 68726640 Genebody 24%** −2.01
Rora Chr9 68865723 Genebody 19% −2.01
Utrn Chr10 12126998 Genebody 20%* 2.02 Anchors cytoskeleton to plasma membrane
Utrn Chr10 12213501 Genebody 20% 2.02
Utrn Chr1012395503 Genebody 19% 2.02
Mef2c Chr13 83687636 Genebody 96% −1.99 Transcription activator controls cardiac morphogenesis and myogenesis, plays a role in vascular development
Mef2c Chr13 83755977 Genebody 30%** −1.99
Mef2c Chr13 83797333 Genebody 25% −1.99
Odz2 Chr11 35940645 Genebody 35%* −1.98 Neural development
Odz2 Chr11 36164904 Genebody 20%* −1.98
Odz2 Chr11 36400641 Genebody 32%** −1.98
Odz2 Chr11 36725324 Genebody 27%** −1.98
Ptprk Chr10 27825617 Genebody 20%* −2.01 Regulation of cell contact and adhesions, tumor invasion/metastasis, Negative regulator of EGFR signaling
Ptprk Chr10 28084547 Genebody 24% −2.01
Ptprk Chr10 28226602 Genebody 24%** −2.01
Enox1 Chr14 77538059 Enhancer 97% −2.00 Oxidoreductase activity, nucleotide binding
Enox1 Chr14 77771534 Genebody 23% −2.00
Enox1 Chr14 77876556 Genebody 20%* −2.00
Enox1 Chr14 77977395 Genebody 20%** −2.00
Zfpm2 Chr15 40787554 Genebody 29% −2.01 Transcription regulator important in heart morphogenesis and coronary vessel development from epicardium
Zfpm2 Chr15 40824705 Genebody 95%** −2.01
Zfpm2 Chr15 40848971 Genebody 19% −2.01
Dach1 Chr14 98263585 Genebody 97%* −1.99 Transcription factor important in organogenesis
Dach1 Chr14 98304412 Genebody 26% −1.99
Dach1 Chr14 98510700 Genebody 96% −1.99
Erc2 Chr14 28475844 Genebody 97% −1.99 Cytomatrix organization at nerve terminal active zones regulating release of neurotransmitters
Erc2 Chr14 28668685 Genebody 30% −1.99
Erc2 Chr14 28822634 Genebody 95% −1.99
Erc2 Chr14 28845440 Genebody 24% −1.99
Vps13b Chr15 35600466 Genebody 23%** −1.99 Protein sorting in post Golgi membrane traffic, may play a role in development and function of the eye, hematological system and the CNS
Vps13b Chr15 35777972 Genebody 19% −1.99
Vps13b Chr15 35817931 Genebody 23%* −1.99
2810403A07Rik Chr3 88506464 Genebody 84% −2.01 RNA binding
Tle4 Chr19 14528880 Genebody 20%* −2.01 Transcriptional co‐repressor of members in Wnt signaling
Tle4 Chr19 14621827 Genebody 24% −2.01
Prkg1 Chr19 30823222 Genebody 19%* −2.02 Regulates cardiac function, smooth muscle contraction, platelet activation and adhesion
Prkg1 Chr19 31528132 Genebody 24% −2.02
Prkg1 Chr19 31595749 Genebody 20% −2.02
Hif1a Chr12 75032797 Genebody 25% −2.00 Hypoxia response, Master transcriptional regulator
Malt1 Chr18 65586771 Promoter 19%* −2.00 NF‐kappaB activation
Igf2r Chr17 12965268 Promoter 44% −2.02 Activation of TGF‐β. Intracellular trafficking of lysosomal enzymes and degradation of IGF2, tumorigenesis, Paternally imprinted
Krtap9‐1 Chr11 99731190 Promoter 27% 8.00 Hair shaft formation
Ccdc40 Chr11 119085948 Promoter 20% −4.03 Motile cilia function. Ciliary dyskinesia type 15
Cftr Chr6 18119186 Promoter 20% −2.00 Chloride channel and enzyme binding, associated with cystic fibrosis
Cftr Chr6 18242079 Genebody 42% −2.00
Pdzd2 Chr15 12315935 Genebody 23% 2.02 Prostate tumorigenesis
Pdzd2 Chr15 12342544 Genebody 27% 2.02
Pdzd2 Chr15 12521967 Promoter 19% 2.02
Elovl2 Chr13 41317598 Promoter 23% −4.04 Atherosclerosis, protein binding and fatty acid elongase activity
Gpr18 Chr14 122316980 Promoter 96% 1.98 Regulation of immune system, bipolar disorder
Rpn1 Chr6 88030514 Promoter 24% −2.01 Dolichyl‐diphosphooligosaccharide‐protein glycotransferase activity
Mosc1 Chr1 186637543 Promoter 19% −4.12
Tmem150c Chr5 100589921 Promoter 25% −2.04
Shroom3 Chr5 93236380 Promoter 27% −2.01 Regulation of cell shape in neuroepithelium
Calb1 Chr4 15806105 Promoter 24% −1.95 Functions in purkinje cells
Gpr61 Chr3 107962781 Promoter 22%** 8.01 G‐protein coupled receptor signaling
Cd40 Chr2 164871483 Enhancer 96% −2.02 Immune and inflammatory response
Ephx1 Chr1 182951005 Promoter 23% 2.02 Cis‐stilbene‐oxide hydrolase activity, epoxide hydrolase activity. Plays a role in preeclampsia
Arhgap29 Chr3 121628392 Enhancer 96% −2.00 Rho GTPase activator activity, essential role in blood vessel tubulogenesis
Fbxl4 Chr4 22244260 Enhancer 21% −2.02 Cell cycle control
Fbxl4 Chr4 22264607 Enhancer 21% −2.02
Zmat3 Chr3 32233835 Genebody 96%** −1.96 TP53‐dependent growth regulatory pathway and TP53‐mediate apoptosis, inhibits tumor cell growth
Zmat3 Chr3 32278426 Enhancer 22% −1.96
Fam125b Chr2 33790838 Enhancer 23%** −2.03 Vesicular trafficking
Serpinb2 Chr1 109370955 Enhancer 31% −4.08 Serine‐type endopeptidase inhibitor activity
Rims1 Chr1 22615396 Genebody 97%* −2.02 Exocytosis, maintenance of neurotransmitter release and regulation of release during short‐term synaptic plasticity
Rims1 Chr1 22763512 Genebody 96% −2.02
Dst Chr1 34249899 Genebody 20% −2.01 Cytoskeletal linker protein, Regulation of keratinocyte polarity and mobility
Dst Chr1 34315083 Genebody 20% −2.01
Dst Chr1 34322642 Genebody 26% −2.01
Etl4 Chr2 20373784 Genebody 23% 2.00 Intervertebral disk development
Etl4 Chr2 20576360 Genebody 95%* 2.00
Esrrg Chr1 189527991 Genebody 46% −2.00 Transcriptional activator via estrogen response elements
Esrrg Chr1 189976300 Genebody 21%* −2.00
Dnm3 Chr1 163949959 Genebody 22% −1.99 Megakaryocyte development, likely involved in endocytosis
Dnm3 Chr1 164108264 Genebody 40%** −1.99
Rbms1 Chr2 60615270 Genebody 25% −2.02 Cell cycle progression, apoptosis, DNA replication and gene transcription.
Rbms1 Chr2 60789032 Genebody 19% −2.02
Lrba Chr3 86163560 Genebody 23% −2.01 Signal transduction and vesicle trafficking
Lrba Chr3 86267521 Genebody 21% −2.01
Plcb1 Chr2 134819839 Genebody 23% −1.99 Intracellular transduction of extracellular signals
Plcb1 Chr2 135145732 Genebody 25% −1.99
Meis2 Chr2 115688950 Genebody 96% −2.01 Transcriptional regulation
Meis2 Chr2 115750462 Genebody 96% −2.01
Bach2 Chr4 32560314 Genebody 21%* −2.00 Transcriptional regulation
Bach2 Chr4 32629036 Genebody 21% −2.00
Kcnd3 Chr3 105447527 Genebody 16%* −1.84 Smooth muscle contraction, heart rate, insulin secretion, neuronal excitability and cell volume
Fam19a1 Chr6 96068370 Genebody 31% −1.91 Regulators of immune cells and cells of the nervous system
Fam19a1 Chr6 96235296 Genebody 19%** −1.91
Drosha Chr15 12715566 Enhancer 22% −2.03 Cleaves ds‐RNA in micro RNA processing
Drosha Chr15 12817558 Genebody 27% −2.03
Gsk3b Chr16 38062422 Enhancer 20% −2.01 Negative regulator in hormonal control of glucose homeostasis, Wnt signaling and the regulation of transcription factors and microtubules. Regulates NFatc1 expression. Mediates development of insulin resistance
Gsk3b Chr16 38138300 Genebody 20%** −2.01
Gsk3b Chr16 38218276 Genebody 96% −2.01
Pmm2 Chr16 8627532 Enhancer 33% −2.02 Glycoprotein biosynthesis
Osta Chr16 32515415 Enhancer 31% −2.00 Transporter activity
Krt8 Chr15 101867475 Enhancer 23% −4.02 Signal transduction and cellular differentiation
Slc38a4 Chr15 96905406 Enhancer 96% −2.00 Sodium‐dependent amino acid transporter
Slc38a2 Chr15 96516885 Enhancer 20%* −2.03 Supply of maternal nutrients to fetus through placenta, transport of amino acids at blood‐brain barrier
Adra2a Chr19 54118496 Promoter 26% 1.99 Mediates the catecholamine‐induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase

Table provides differentially expressed genes with corresponding differential methylation (DM) sites. Bolded DM values indicate decreased methylation at E14.5 whilst unbolded DM values indicates increased methylation at E14.5.

*Notes P<0.05 in methylation changes and **notes P<0.01 in methylation changes. Gene functions are summarized.

Recent studies of the correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression have found that increased promoter and enhancer methylation often lead to gene silencing while DNA methylation at gene bodies corresponds with gene activation.53 We therefore examined the functional correlation between differential gene expression and changes in DNA methylation. We found that among the top 15 downregulated genes at E14.5, 4 of them contained an increase in methylation of sites located within promoter or enhancer regions and an additional 4 showed decreased methylation in their gene bodies (Figure 5B). Of the top 15 upregulated genes, 4 had decreased methylation in their enhancers and 3 exhibited increased methylation in their gene bodies. We found that, while 12.7% (23) of the 181 differentially expressed genes contained differentially methylated sites within the promoter region, methylation of only 60.8% (14) of those genes was predictive of their expression difference between E11.5 and E14.5, and overall 43.6% (79) of genes had differentially methylated sites predictive of expression change. The findings suggest that not all DNA methylation is functional; most genes are regulated independent of methylation.54 Nevertheless, the observed correlations between gene expression and DNA methylation during heart development do support that DNA methylation regulates expression of a subset of genes during heart development.

Increased DNA Methylation at Enhancers is Associated With Decreased Expression of the Cardiac‐Essential Gene Has2 in the Developing Heart

These correlations suggest a regulatory relationship between DNA methylation and cardiac‐important genes. Notably, Has2 is essential for endocardial to mesenchymal transformation and heart valve formation.51,5556,6 Gene network analysis using the Genemania open freeware (http://www.genemania.org) further revealed potential genetic and/or physical interactions among genes or pathways involved in heart development. The top 20 genes that were identified to interact (either genetically or physically) with Has2 by the network analysis were significantly enriched with functions involved in heart development. These genes included Cdh2, Epo, Kcna5, Myocd, Tbx20, Hand1, Mef2c, and Nfatc4 (Figure 6).49,5759 Regulation of these genes by DNA methylation to influence their expression will ultimately affect their pathway and downstream functions, which are essential for heart development.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Network analysis for DNA methylation‐regulated Has2. Top: Genemania analysis reveals multiple relationships between Has2 and multiple cardiac genes including Myocd, Kcna5, Mef2c, Hand1, Tbx20 and Nfatc4. Bottom: Top functions of genes in the Has2 network.

Previous knockout studies in mice have shown that Has2 is essential for development of cardiac valves and septa.51,56 Here, our DNA methylation analysis indicated that an ACGT site located within 1 kb of a previously determined enhancer of Has2, marked by enriched H3K27ac at E14.5,44 exhibited an increase in methylation as confirmed by Sequenom's MassArray (Figure 7A). Based on what is known about DNA methylation, we expected to see a decrease in Has2 expression at E14.5, with confirmation by qPCR analysis (Figure 7B). To further characterize its expression in the developing hearts, we carried out RNA in situ hybridization. The results showed that Has2 expression was predominately expressed in the endocardial cells and their mesenchymal progeny cells that form the primitive heart valves at E11.5, but its expression markedly diminished by E14.5 (Figure 7C), consistent with its function in endocardial to mesenchymal transformation around E11.5 for heart valve development.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Has2 expression is regulated by Dnmt3b. A, MassArray showing increased Has2 enhancer methylation at E14.5 (n=2). B, RT‐qPCR showing decreased Has2 expression at E14.5 (n=3). C, RNA in situ hybridization showing that Has2 expression is predominantly in the atrioventricular canal (avc), with less expression in the myocardium (myo) at E11.5; and the expression is diminished by E14.5. mv/tv, mitral/tricuspid valve; ivs, interventricular septum. D, IHC showing Dnmt3b is predominantly expressed in AVC at E11.5. E, X‐gal staining showing the Nfatc1‐Cre mediated LacZ expression in the AVC at E11.5. F, RT‐qPCR showing that deletion of Dnmt3b resulted in increased Has2 expression at E11.5 and E14.5 (n=3). Error bars represent standard error. *Marks statistical significance (P<0.001, 2 factor ANOVA in [F]). ANOVA indicates analysis of variance; CKO, conditional knockout; IHC, immunohistochemistry; RT‐qPCR, quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction; WT, wild type.

Dnmt3b Suppresses Expression of the Cardiac‐Essential Gene Has2 in the Developing Heart

We next chose to determine experimentally the function of DNA methylation in Has2 expression in the developing heart valves. To overcome the difficulty of not being able to directly assay the in vivo role of methylation of the Has2 enhancer on the expression of the gene in the developing heart, we inactivated the activity of DNA methyltransferase 3b (Dnmt3b), which is responsible for de novo methylation during embryonic development.22 First, we showed that, like Has2, Dnmt3b was expressed predominately in the endocardial cells, precursor cells for the heart valves (Figure 7D). The expression pattern of Dnmt3b suggests that it has a role in DNA methylation in the endocardial cell lineages and may therefore regulate Has2 expression in the developing heart valves. Indeed, deletion of Dnmt3b in the endocardial cells and their valve progeny, using the endocardial‐specific Nfatc1Cre mice (Figure 7E),9 resulted in significantly increased Has2 expression in the developing heart valves at E11.5 and E14.5 (Figure 7F). The results support that DNA methylation of the Has2 enhancer plays a role in repressing its expression during heart development.

Discussion

In this study, we generated a developmental profile of DNA methylation using methyl sensitive tiny fragment enrichment coupled with massively parallel sequencing (MSFE/MPS). Greater coverage and increased sensitivity for the detection of methylation are achieved using this method compared with microarray‐based techniques. The method also provides more detailed information specific for ACGT sites and is capable of detecting intermediate levels of methylation, allowing for detection of modest changes in methylation.60

Our technique was adapted from the HpaII tiny fragment enrichment by ligation mediated PCR (HELP)‐tagging assay developed by Suzuki et al3233 In the original HELP‐tagging assay a methylation sensitive restriction enzyme, HpaII, is used to assess methylation of CpG dinucleotides located within its recognition site 5′‐CCGG‐3′. We modified this technique by using a different methylation‐sensitive restriction enzyme, HpyCH4IV, whose recognition site is 5′‐ACGT‐3′ even though it lacks a methylation‐insensitive isoschizomer. Previous studies have confirmed that sequencing reads/tags from a single methylation sensitive restriction enzyme without its isoschizomer are highly correlated with methylation status.32,61 Furthermore, we used independent validation methods, such as LUMA and MassArray to confirm methylation levels determined by the MSFE/MPS.

HpyCH4IV provides comparable genome coverage to HpaII, having 1.7 million recognition sites located throughout the genome. Future studies using both enzymes will not only double the coverage but also examine and compare DNA methylation in both CG rich and non‐CG rich regions. In addition, the use of HpyCH4IV will, in future studies, allow us to directly examine, in a genome‐wide manner, the effect of methylation on transcription factor binding sites such as Hif1α, whose consensus binding sequence is 5′‐ACGTG‐3′ and has been shown to be regulated by DNA methylation.62

The original analytical pipeline was also modified to analyze our MPS data generated by using HpyCH4IV.37 Within the HELP‐tagging protocol an internal experimental control is used in which contaminating fragments are recognized based on the absence of the digested restriction site.60 Additionally, to better identify differentially methylated sites between developmental stages, we generated a threshold to determine levels of methylation at individual loci. We employed these modifications to generate a genome wide developmental profile of methylation at ACGT sites in the developing heart. The results showed no significant global change in methylation over mid‐stage heart development, although our study did not include the repetitive regions of the genome as they could not be aligned and thus discarded in the pipeline. We further confirmed that there is no significant change in global methylation patterns using LUMA.

Although drastic changes in global DNA methylation are not present during heart development, differential methylation was detected at a small subset of individual loci throughout the genome in this study. Furthermore, we detected a number of differentially methylated sites in which the change in methylation between E11.5 and E14.5 corresponds with the observed change in expression of the nearby gene, suggesting that there is a regulatory relationship between DNA methylation and the expression of cardiac‐important genes including Has2.

Has2 has previously been identified to be essential for heart development, playing a role in epicardial cell differentiation, heart valve development, and septation.51,55 A DNA methylation‐regulated cardiac gene program was generated by performing a network analysis for Has2 using Genemania. Network analysis revealed multiple relationships between Has2 and other cardiac‐important gene products, including previously mentioned Tbx20, involved in endocardial cushion formation and heart valve remodeling,57 Hand 1 involved in ventricle morphogenesis,58 and Nfatc4, a member of the nuclear factor of activated T‐cell family that are known to be essential for heart development.59 Additional connections have been identified between Has2 and Gjc1 (Connexin45), known to play an important role in cardiac morphogenesis and conduction,63 and Cdh2, Epo, Kcna5, Mef2c, and Myocd, which are essential for heart development and function.

We further studied methylation of Has2 and its expression in the developing heart in detail, as it has an increase in enhancer methylation that corresponds with a decrease in its expression over mid‐stage heart development in the developing heart valves. We showed by qPCR analysis, RNA in situ hybridization, and genetic knockout that Dnmt3b regulates Has2 expression, possibly through its enhancer methylation.

In this study we were able to assay 1.64 million ACGT sites for potential changes in DNA methylation during mid‐stage cardiac development, identifying 2901 differentially methylated sites, and determined a number of developmentally important cardiac genes that are likely to be regulated by DNA methylation. However, current methods for studying functionality of DNA methylation at specific sites in the developing heart are limited. We circumvented this limitation by revealing the dependence of Has2 expression on Dnmt3b expression in the developing heart valves. Our results are mainly discovery and by necessity preliminary, and will require a much larger sample size to detect more sites with more subtle DNA methylation changes between the 2 developmental stages.

In conclusion, our results support an essential role for DNA methylation in the regulation of cardiac essential genes during heart development and suggest abnormal DNA methylation may contribute to the pathogenesis of congenital heart disease. Using this study as a starting point, we plan to investigate further candidate genes as well as the role of additional epigenetic modifications that may play a role in heart development and disease.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by funds from the National Institute of Health (T32‐Training Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology and Genetics, GM007491) to Chamberlain, and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (HL078881, HL104444, and HL111770).

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Wendy Lui, Pratistha Koirala, Shahina Maqbool, David Reynolds, and Bernice Morrow for helpful discussions or technique support.

References

  • 1.Webb S, Brown NA, Anderson RH. Formation of the atrioventricular septal structures in the normal mouse. Circ Res. 1998; 82:645-656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Savolainen SM, Foley JF, Elmore SA. Histology atlas of the developing mouse heart with emphasis on E11.5 to E18.5. Toxicol Pathol. 2009; 37:395-414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De la Cruz MV, Gimenez‐Ribotta M, Saravalli O, Cayre R. The contribution of the inferior endocardial cushion of the atrioventricular canal to cardiac septation and to the development of the atrioventricular valves: study in the chick embryo. Am J Anat. 1983; 166:63-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lincoln J, Alfieri CM, Yutzey KE. Development of heart valve leaflets and supporting apparatus in chicken and mouse embryos. Dev Dyn. 2004; 230:239-250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Y, Wu B, Chamberlain AA, Lui W, Koirala P, Susztak K, Klein D, Taylor V, Zhou B. Endocardial to myocardial notch‐wnt‐bmp axis regulates early heart valve development. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e60244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Camenisch TD, Schroeder JA, Bradley J, Klewer SE, McDonald JA. Heart‐valve mesenchyme formation is dependent on hyaluronan‐augmented activation of ErbB2‐ErbB3 receptors. Nat Med. 2002; 8:850-855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ramsdell AF, Moreno‐Rodriguez RA, Wienecke MM, Sugi Y, Turner DK, Mjaatvedt CH, Markwald RR. Identification of an autocrine signaling pathway that amplifies induction of endocardial cushion tissue in the avian heart. Acta Anat. 1998; 162:1-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Z, Zhou B. Accelerated coronary angiogenesis by vegfr1‐knockout endocardial cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e70570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu B, Wang Y, Lui W, Langworthy M, Tompkins KL, Hatzopoulos AK, Baldwin HS, Zhou B. Nfatc1 coordinates valve endocardial cell lineage development required for heart valve formation. Circ Res. 2011; 109:183-192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu B, Zhang Z, Lui W, Chen X, Wang Y, Chamberlain AA, Moreno‐Rodriguez RA, Markwald RR, O'Rourke BP, Sharp DJ, Zheng D, Lenz J, Baldwin HS, Chang CP, Zhou B. Endocardial cells form the coronary arteries by angiogenesis through myocardial‐endocardial VEGF signaling. Cell. 2012; 151:1083-1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Montgomery RL, Davis CA, Potthoff MJ, Haberland M, Fielitz J, Qi X, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN. Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 redundantly regulate cardiac morphogenesis, growth, and contractility. Genes Dev. 2007; 21:1790-1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee Y, Song AJ, Baker R, Micales B, Conway SJ, Lyons GE. Jumonji, a nuclear protein that is necessary for normal heart development. Circ Res. 2000; 86:932-938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Naya FJ, Wu C, Richardson JA, Overbeek P, Olson EN. Transcriptional activity of MEF2 during mouse embryogenesis monitored with a MEF2‐dependent transgene. Development. 1999; 126:2045-2052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goldberg AD, Allis CD, Bernstein E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell. 2007; 128:635-638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee DY, Hayes JJ, Pruss D, Wolffe AP. A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell. 1993; 72:73-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prokhortchouk E, Defossez PA. The cell biology of DNA methylation in mammals. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008; 1783:2167-2173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vilkaitis G, Merkiene E, Serva S, Weinhold E, Klimasauskas S. The mechanism of DNA cytosine‐5 methylation. Kinetic and mutational dissection of Hhai methyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:20924-20934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jackson‐Grusby L, Beard C, Possemato R, Tudor M, Fambrough D, Csankovszki G, Dausman J, Lee P, Wilson C, Lander E, Jaenisch R. Loss of genomic methylation causes p53‐dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation. Nat Genet. 2001; 27:31-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007; 447:425-432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Howlett SK, Reik W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development. 1991; 113:119-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Olek A, Walter J. The pre‐implantation ontogeny of the H19 methylation imprint. Nat Genet. 1997; 17:275-276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell. 1999; 99:247-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Movassagh M, Choy MK, Goddard M, Bennett MR, Down TA, Foo RS. Differential DNA methylation correlates with differential expression of angiogenic factors in human heart failure. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e8564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shahrzad S, Bertrand K, Minhas K, Coomber BL. Induction of DNA hypomethylation by tumor hypoxia. Epigenetics. 2007; 2:119-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Watson JA, Watson CJ, McCrohan AM, Woodfine K, Tosetto M, McDaid J, Gallagher E, Betts D, Baugh J, O'Sullivan J, Murrell A, Watson RW, McCann A. Generation of an epigenetic signature by chronic hypoxia in prostate cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2009; 18:3594-3604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Waterland RA, Michels KB. Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007; 27:363-388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007; 131:861-872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006; 126:663-676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jeanpierre M, Turleau C, Aurias A, Prieur M, Ledeist F, Fischer A, Viegas‐Pequignot E. An embryonic‐like methylation pattern of classical satellite DNA is observed in ICF syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1993; 2:731-735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ueda Y, Okano M, Williams C, Chen T, Georgopoulos K, Li E. Roles for Dnmt3b in mammalian development: a mouse model for the ICF syndrome. Development. 2006; 133:1183-1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khulan B, Thompson RF, Ye K, Fazzari MJ, Suzuki M, Stasiek E, Figueroa ME, Glass JL, Chen Q, Montagna C, Hatchwell E, Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Green RD, Melnick A, Greally JM. Comparative isoschizomer profiling of cytosine methylation: the help assay. Genome Res. 2006; 16:1046-1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Suzuki M, Jing Q, Lia D, Pascual M, McLellan A, Greally JM. Optimized design and data analysis of tag‐based cytosine methylation assays. Genome Biol. 2010; 11:R36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Suzuki M, Greally JM. DNA methylation profiling using hpaii tiny fragment enrichment by ligation‐mediated PCR (HELP). Methods. 2010; 52:218-222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Karimi M, Johansson S, Stach D, Corcoran M, Grander D, Schalling M, Bakalkin G, Lyko F, Larsson C, Ekstrom TJ. LUMA (Luminometric Methylation Assay)—a high throughput method to the analysis of genomic DNA methylation. Exp Cell Res. 2006; 312:1989-1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karimi M, Johansson S, Ekstrom TJ. Using LUMA: a luminometric‐based assay for global DNA‐methylation. Epigenetics. 2006; 1:45-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thompson RF, Suzuki M, Lau KW, Greally JM. A pipeline for the quantitative analysis of CG dinucleotide methylation using mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2164-2170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dubin R, Jing Q, O'Broin P, Calder B, Moskowitz D, Suzuki M, McLellan A, Greally J. WASP: wiki‐based automated sequence processor for epigenomics and genomics applications. J Biomol Tech. 2010; 21:S11 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. Edger: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:139-140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real‐time quantitative PCR and the 2(‐Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001; 25:402-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, Ching CW, Hawkins RD, Barrera LO, Van Calcar S, Qu C, Ching KA, Wang W, Weng Z, Green RD, Crawford GE, Ren B. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007; 39:311-318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tie F, Banerjee R, Stratton CA, Prasad‐Sinha J, Stepanik V, Zlobin A, Diaz MO, Scacheri PC, Harte PJ. CBP‐mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing. Development. 2009; 136:3131-3141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Blow MJ, McCulley DJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer‐Frick I, Shoukry M, Wright C, Chen F, Afzal V, Bristow J, Ren B, Black BL, Rubin EM, Visel A, Pennacchio LA. ChIP‐Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers. Nat Genet. 2010; 42:806-810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stadler MB, Murr R, Burger L, Ivanek R, Lienert F, Scholer A, van Nimwegen E, Wirbelauer C, Oakeley EJ, Gaidatzis D, Tiwari VK, Schubeler D. DNA‐binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature. 2011; 480:490-495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shen Y, Yue F, McCleary DF, Ye Z, Edsall L, Kuan S, Wagner U, Dixon J, Lee L, Lobanenkov VV, Ren B. A map of the cis‐regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature. 2012; 488:116-120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rada‐Iglesias A, Bajpai R, Swigut T, Brugmann SA, Flynn RA, Wysocka J. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature. 2011; 470:279-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang Y, Morrisey E. Regulation of cardiomyocyte proliferation by FOXP1. Cell Cycle. 2010; 9:4251-4252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alexandrovich A, Arno M, Patient RK, Shah AM, Pizzey JA, Brewer AC. Wnt2 is a direct downstream target of GATA6 during early cardiogenesis. Mech Dev. 2006; 123:297-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tian Y, Yuan L, Goss AM, Wang T, Yang J, Lepore JJ, Zhou D, Schwartz RJ, Patel V, Cohen ED, Morrisey EE. Characterization and in vivo pharmacological rescue of a Wnt2‐Gata6 pathway required for cardiac inflow tract development. Dev Cell. 2010; 18:275-287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lin Q, Schwarz J, Bucana C, Olson EN. Control of mouse cardiac morphogenesis and myogenesis by transcription factor MEF2C. Science. 1997; 276:1404-1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ghosh TK, Song FF, Packham EA, Buxton S, Robinson TE, Ronksley J, Self T, Bonser AJ, Brook JD. Physical interaction between TBX5 and MEF2C is required for early heart development. Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 29:2205-2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Camenisch TD, Spicer AP, Brehm‐Gibson T, Biesterfeldt J, Augustine ML, Calabro A, Jr, Kubalak S, Klewer SE, McDonald JA. Disruption of hyaluronan synthase‐2 abrogates normal cardiac morphogenesis and hyaluronan‐mediated transformation of epithelium to mesenchyme. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106:349-360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Osborne JD, Flatow J, Holko M, Lin SM, Kibbe WA, Zhu LJ, Danila MI, Feng G, Chisholm RL. Annotating the human genome with disease ontology. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10suppl 1:S6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Aran D, Toperoff G, Rosenberg M, Hellman A. Replication timing‐related and gene body‐specific methylation of active human genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20:670-680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lande‐Diner L, Zhang J, Ben‐Porath I, Amariglio N, Keshet I, Hecht M, Azuara V, Fisher AG, Rechavi G, Cedar H. Role of DNA methylation in stable gene repression. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:12194-12200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Craig EA, Austin AF, Vaillancourt RR, Barnett JV, Camenisch TD. TGFbeta2‐mediated production of hyaluronan is important for the induction of epicardial cell differentiation and invasion. Exp Cell Res. 2010; 316:3397-3405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Camenisch TD, Molin DG, Person A, Runyan RB, Gittenberger‐de Groot AC, McDonald JA, Klewer SE. Temporal and distinct TGFbeta ligand requirements during mouse and avian endocardial cushion morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2002; 248:170-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cai X, Zhang W, Hu J, Zhang L, Sultana N, Wu B, Cai W, Zhou B, Cai CL. Tbx20 acts upstream of Wnt signaling to regulate endocardial cushion formation and valve remodeling during mouse cardiogenesis. Development. 2013; 140:3176-3187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McFadden DG, Barbosa AC, Richardson JA, Schneider MD, Srivastava D, Olson EN. The Hand1 and Hand2 transcription factors regulate expansion of the embryonic cardiac ventricles in a gene dosage‐dependent manner. Development. 2005; 132:189-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen Y, Yuen WH, Fu J, Huang G, Melendez AJ, Ibrahim FB, Lu H, Cao X. The mitochondrial respiratory chain controls intracellular calcium signaling and NFAT activity essential for heart formation in Xenopus laevis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 27:6420-6432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Oda M, Glass JL, Thompson RF, Mo Y, Olivier EN, Figueroa ME, Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Zhang X, Dannenberg L, Green RD, Melnick A, Hatchwell E, Bouhassira EE, Verma A, Suzuki M, Greally JM. High‐resolution genome‐wide cytosine methylation profiling with simultaneous copy number analysis and optimization for limited cell numbers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:3829-3839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ball MP, Li JB, Gao Y, Lee JH, LeProust EM, Park IH, Xie B, Daley GQ, Church GM. Targeted and genome‐scale strategies reveal gene‐body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009; 27:361-368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wenger RH, Kvietikova I, Rolfs A, Camenisch G, Gassmann M. Oxygen‐regulated erythropoietin gene expression is dependent on a CpG methylation‐free hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 DNA‐binding site. Eur J Biochem. 1998; 253:771-777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kruger O, Maxeiner S, Kim JS, van Rijen HV, de Bakker JM, Eckardt D, Tiemann K, Lewalter T, Ghanem A, Luderitz B, Willecke K. Cardiac morphogenetic defects and conduction abnormalities in mice homozygously deficient for connexin40 and heterozygously deficient for connexin45. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006; 41:787-797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES