Abstract
Fluorescence imaging techniques are becoming essential in preclinical investigations, and the research of suitable tools for in vivo measurements is gaining more and more importance and attention. Nanotechnology entered the field to try to find solutions for many limitation at the state of the art, and luminescent nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the most promising materials proposed for future diagnostic implementation. NPs constitute also a versatile platform that can allow facile multi-functionalization to perform multimodal imaging or theranostic (simultaneous diagnosis and therapy).
In this contribution we have focussed our attention only on dye doped silica or silica-based NPs conjugated with targeting moieties to enable specific cancer cells imaging and differentiation, even if also a few non targeted systems have been cited and discussed for completeness. We have summarized common synthetic approaches to these materials and then surveyed the most recent imaging applications of silica-based nanoparticles in cancer. The field of theranostic is so important and stimulating that, even if it is not the central topic of this paper, we have included some significant examples. We have then concluded with short hints on systems already in clinical trials and examples of specific applications in children tumours.
This review tries to describe and discuss, through focussed examples, the great potentialities of these materials in the medical field, with the aim to encourage further research to implement applications that are still rare.
Keywords: Diagnostics, Drug delivery, Fluorescence, Imaging, Luminescence, PEG, Silica Nanoparticles, Theranostics
1. INTRODUCTION
Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer are essential to minimize morbidity and mortality. Accurate identification of even sub-millimetric masses by imaging has important implications for disease staging, prognosis, and clinical outcome. Over the last decade, more than 1400 protein markers have been proposed as potential cancer diagnostics to the FDA, and the FDA has only approved 14 since 2001. This disappointing result is largely explained by the fact that a single molecule is insufficient to account for the complex events occurring during cancer onset and progression. It is evident that we need much more global, integrated information to develop a really effective innovation in cancer diagnostics. The advent of high-throughput technologies is providing complex cancer signatures rather than just single markers. In turn, these signatures can be exploited for the set up of barcode-targeted approaches, in association with state-of-the art delivery and detection systems.
Nanotechnology is now joining medicine to aid to overcome persisting limitations of current cancer treatments, by offering more effective, safer and more affordable diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Of all the various possibilities, we believe that silica-based luminescent nanoparticles (SNPs) can offer, in this context, very appealing solutions. The choice of dealing with luminescent material is due to the fact that luminescence measurements are usually very sensitive (even single molecule detection is possible), easily performed, and versatile, offering submicron spatial resolution and sub millisecond temporal resolution.1 This allows, in general, low detection limits (and thus, early diagnosis), and could permit the track down of biological events, opening up the comprehension of the origin and growth of different pathologies, including cancer. Compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging, optical imaging is much easier to use and cost-effective, and can be applied to cancer diagnosis with high resolution.2 This could take to direct visualization of tumour tissues in real-time during the surgical process, providing a direct guidance to surgeons for effective and complete tumour resection. 3 Finally, since optical fibres are currently used in the investigation of some specific tumours (as colorectal cancer), NIR imaging can be easily and straight introduced into the clinical practice.4
There are different nanocolloids which may, in many cases, offer a valuable alternative to SNPs, such as dye-doped latex nanoparticles5–7 or intrinsically luminescent nanomaterials, such as the so called quantum dots (QDs).3,8,9 However, to our opinion, silica is the one capable to offer all the required features for diagnostic and theranostic applications in the most effective way. 3,8,10–14 Silica is, in fact, intrinsically not toxic, although more in-depth investigations are under way to completely rule out possible hazards related to the tiny dimensions of nanoparticles. Preliminary experiments point in favour of their benign nature even supporting their use for in vivo imaging and therapy.3,4,8,11 Silica nanoparticles constitute a robust domain also under different external stimuli, providing to the loaded species increased mechanical strength and chemical stability, protection against enzymatic degradation, an enhanced resistance to photobleaching and an almost constant environment in chemical terms. 15,16 Since silica is photophysically inert, it is transparent to visible light and it is not involved in energy- and electron-transfer processes that may quench the luminescence of the dyes linked to the matrix. On the other hand, each silica nanoparticle can contain many active species, and this can induce collective effects to be advantageously used for increasing the brightness and, in general, the signal-to-noise ratio. Moreover, as it will be described below, the great versatility offered by the different synthetic strategies, typically requiring inexpensive reagents and mild conditions, is an extremely valuable characteristic since it opens up the possibility to adapt these materials for a large number of applications.4,11
While some nanomedicine-based drug/dye delivery systems have already been marketed and others are in clinical trial, most still remain in the stage of preclinical development. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles have been highlighted as an interesting drug delivery platform, due to their flexibility and high drug load potential, and have therefore been extensively investigated as delivery systems. In spite of a considerable interest in the biomedical applications of such nanoparticles, the knowledge of their in vivo biocompatibility, toxicity and bio-distribution remains limited, which has delayed the onset of human clinical trials.
2. SYNTHESIS OF LUMINESCENT SILICA NANOPARTICLES
Synthetic methods in solution to obtain luminescent silica nanoparticles are characterized by many common characteristics: simplicity, low costs, versatility, and control over the morphology of the resulting materials. They are variation of sol-gel processes that share the common feature of the silica formation by means of the controlled hydrolysis and condensation of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS). This fundamental process can be driven to nanoparticles formation by a proper choice of parameters, that mainly are acid-base catalytic conditions and the nanoparticle nucleation-growth confinement. These main synthetic approaches are the so called Stöber-Van Blaaderen, reverse microemulsions (also called water in oil)17,18 and direct micelles assisted methods.3,18,19 In most cases they need the use of trialkoxysilane derivatized dyes,20,21 to ensures the covalent incorporation of the fluorophores, to avoid dye leaching in the external environment. Every strategy presents its own strengths and limitations, that contribute in a synergistic way to define the overall efficiency of the synthetic method toward a particular range of applications. In Table 1 the principal features of these synthetic strategies are summarized and qualitatively rated.
Table 1.
Main fluorescent silica nanoparticles synthetic methods: versatility
| Silica NPs Synthetic Method |
Dimensional Range |
Pristine Colloidal Stability |
Dyes Incorporation |
Surface Modification |
Accessibility to Hybrid architectures |
Overall Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stöber | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | ++ | + |
|
Reverse Microemulsion (W/O) |
++ | ++ | + | +++ | +++ | ++ |
| Direct Micelles | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
The overall synthesis efficiency is, in general, evaluated averaging several contributions, that when diagnostic applications are concerned, deal mainly with the brightness of the system (dyes incorporation), the surface modification (targeting, colloidal stability and behaviour in biological environments) and the dimensional range. In complex architectures, in fact, the spatial control over nanoparticle components is often a mandatory prerequisite to perform specific functions.
2.1 STÖBER METHOD
With this method the TEOS hydrolysis and nanoparticles formation is promoted by ammonia in an ethanol-water mixture. The accessible dimensional range is quite large (10 to several hundred of nm, with one pot procedures) and can be controlled varying concentrations and ratios of the components in the reaction mixture (TEOS, water and ammonia). An interesting variation of the Stöber method, especially for the development of very tiny nanoparticles (d ≅ 10 nm), and of multiple-shell monodisperse nanoparticles, employs amino acids as hydrolytic catalyst and a phase transfer approach to modulate the TEOS precursor supply into the nanoparticles growing medium.22 Generally the obtained nanoparticles have very large negative Z-potential values due to deprotonated Si-OH groups on the surface that strongly stabilized the resulting colloidal suspension by electrostatic repulsion. Further functionalization with additional alkoxysilane components is still possible for many applications, even if with very small particles, aggregation problems and incomplete passivation of the surface can make this process quite tricky. Dyes incorporation is usually obtained by introduction of tralkoxysilane derivatizad dyes. The number of molecular dyes usable is quite large, even if few limitations can arise from scarce solubility in the reaction milieu. Purification processes may include precipitation-centrifugation, ultrafiltration, dialysis, and more sophisticated instrumental techniques such as FlFFF (Flow Field Flow Fractionation).23 These last three purification methods stands out for mildness and contribute to preserve the nanoparticles monodispersity.
2.2 REVERSE MICROEMULSION METHOD
The reverse microemulsion (also named water in oil) methods are basically Stöber processes that are carried out in a macroscopically isotropic dispersion of a surfactant and water in an hydrocarbon. The aqueous nuclei of the reverse microemulsion act as nano-vessels were the hydrolysis and condensation processes are confined to form the nanoparticles. Several synthetic protocols are able to give quite simple access to nanoparticles synthesis and surface modification in the dimensional range of about 15–200 nm,18,24 that mainly depend upon surfactant type and by the surfactant to water molar ratio.25 This method is particularly versatile in preparing nanoparticles with a layer by layer structure, to develop hybrid structures incorporating different kinds of nanoparticles (metals, QDs, magnetic, etc.) and also for surface modification with chemical functionalities to impart stabilization or to allow bio-molecules targeting insertion. All these modifications can be in fact obtained by subsequent additions of reactants within the microemulsion, without intermediate purification steps. In general the method has a very good applicability toward positive charged water soluble dyes, that in principle can be incorporated and retained in the nanoparticle silica matrix by strong electrostatic interactions, but it has strong limitations in incorporating poorly water soluble fluorophores or negatively charged ones. Final purifications steps are always needed to separate nanoparticles from the large amount of surfactant and organic solvent that constitute the reverse microemulsion. These work-up procedures are usually constituted by subsequent centrifugations-sonication steps, that can bring to irreversible aggregation if unsuitable surface modifications or work-up conditions are adopted.
2.3 DIRECT MICELLES ASSISTED METHODS
The possibility to use direct aggregates of surfactants in water is the most recently proposed method between the ones described so far. The strategy is to confine the nanoparticle formation within aggregates or co-aggregate, exploiting the accumulation of silica precursors such as TEOS and organo-alkoxysilane that have a lipophilic nature before and during the first hydrolysis and condensation steps. These methods usually provide very mono-disperse nanoparticles in water, with a dimensional range of 10–60 nm, features that make them versatile and reliable strategies for the development of luminescent colloids for in-vivo and in-vitro applications. The use of water as solvent and of far lower surfactant (co-surfactant) quantities in comparison with the ones necessary in the reverse microemulsions strategies represent the major strengths of this approach. Within the direct micelle assisted synthetic routes, the main differences reside on the molecular weight of the surfactant that is involved in the nanoparticles formation.
Following this approach Prasad and co-workers developed many systems in the 20–30 nm dimensional range based on ORMOSIL nanoparticles (Organic - Modified - Silica), obtained using oil in water systems usually made by surfactant / 1-butanol / DMSO / water, mixtures. The low molecular weight surfactants normally used are AOT (Bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate sodium salt) or Tween 80, while the lipophilic silica precursor is VTES (triethoxyvinylsilane), which hydrolysis is promoted by addition of APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane) or ammonia. This kind of nanoparticles have a certain degree of mesoporosity so that covalent condensation of the doping agents is needed to avoid leaching from the particle.26 With this strategy, surface functionalization (−NH2, −COOH, −SH also together with PEG chains)27 is ready accessible and allows for conjugation with bioactive molecules.28–30 The incorporation of dyes,31 PDT agents,32,33 and the possibility to obtain hybrid structures containing QDs and Fe3O4 nanoparticles34 make the ORMOSIL particles as multimodal imaging and therapeutic agents.
Another possibility is to use this general strategy with high molecular weight surfactants to form micellar aggregates. The main consequence is that thanks to entrapment-adsorption phenomena, the surfactant molecules can be irreversibly bound to the silica matrix, becoming part of the whole nanoparticle structure in a one-pot procedure. Suitable surfactants are for example tri-block A-B-A copolymers, such as commercial Pluronic surfactants, bearing a PEG-PPO-PEG (poly(ethyle glycol)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene glycol)) structure. Using micelles of Pluronic F127 (MW 12.6 KDa), triethoxysilane-derivatized dyes and TEOS in an acidic environment we have recently proposed a synthetic strategy35,36 useful to obtain ordered luminescent core-shell silica-PEG nanoparticles with very high monodispersity and colloidal stability in water, bearing a silica core of about 10 nm and an overall hydrodynamic diameter (PEG shell) of about 25 nm. This last feature, deriving from the entrapped Pluronic F127, together with the non-toxic properties of Pluronic F127 are valuable characteristics able to confer stealth properties in biological environments.37 This synthetic method stands out for the vast variety of triealkoxysilane derivatized dyes that can be included in the silica core, independently by their solubility properties. These core-shell silica-PEG nanoparticles can act as labels, thank to the possibility to modify the Pluronic F127 hydroxy end groups. These modifications are carried out in the pristine Pluronic 127 surfactant, then used in the nanoparticles synthesis in the desired amount, so that no post nanoparticle functionalization is needed to introduce chemical functionalities (−COOH, −NH2, −SH, −N3, alkynes, etc.) for targeting and bio-molecules conjugation.38–40
3. IMAGING WITH SILICA-BASED NANOPARTICLES IN CANCER
A plethora of novel silica-based nano-objects for cancer imaging are being developed that combine (i) different detection approaches, e.g. fluorescence, MRI, Raman spectroscopy and, often, (ii) therapeutic agents, with the possibility of achieving a selective targeting of tumors through the functionalization by tumor-specific ligands, e.g. antibodies, proteins, synthetic peptides.
3.1 UNTARGETED IMAGING
The simplest nanoparticles are for diagnostic use only and non-targeted, being particularly designed to improve their optical/magnetic properties while optimizing their geometry. A huge literature about non-targeted NPs is available and only some representative examples will be discussed in this review while targeted systems will be discussed, in the next section, in a more exhaustive way.41–54 In a first example, fluorescent conjugated polymers and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanocrystals have been integrated into silica nanocapsules, to obtain uniform and stable nanosystems with dual-mode (fluorescence and MRI) functionality. Different polymers were investigated, demonstrating the versatility of these materials; the corresponding nanoparticles were investigated in vitro for their capability to identify cultured human liver cancer cells in dual mode imaging. The super-paramagnetic behavior of these particles was further exploited for their magnetic guidance into cancer cells.55 A similar dual modal nanoprobe, combining optical and MR imaging was produced as a 16 nm-silica carbonate nanoparticle simultaneously doped with a rare earth ion (Terbius) and Gadolinium. In vitro, these nanoparticles were efficiently delivered to different cancer cell lines, e.g. SGC7901 gastric cancer cells and NCI-H460 lung cancer cells, without causing any toxic effect at the experimental doses.56,57 The application of such nanomaterials to preclinical models is the successive step toward possible clinical translation. A PET/MRI silica nanoprobe with an enhanced near infrared fluorescence signal was obtained by encapsulating a near infrared dye (NIR797) into magnetic silica nanoparticles labeled with Gallium 68 as a radiotracer. When injected into the forepaw of mice, they demonstrated high fluorescent intensity and stability, providing multimodal in vivo imaging of sentinel lymph node.57
3.2 UNTARGETED THERANOSTIC
Most untargeted systems, however, exhibit a further level of complexity by associating a therapeutic agent (e.g. a chemotherapeutic drug) and/or approach (e.g. a photosensitizer for phototermal therapy) to the imaging probe. Mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods have recently been developed to combine two-photon imaging of cancer cells with the delivery and laser-triggered release of a chemotherapeutic drug, i.e. doxorubicin (by low power density), associated with laser-induced hyperthermia (by high power density) in vitro.58 Other high technology-based approaches associate (i) fluorescence-surface-enhanced Raman scattering of SERS tags obtained by coupling silver nanoparticles (as optical enhancers) with 4-mercaptopyridine (a reporter molecule) in the silica shell, with (ii) a fluorescent dye (flavin mononucleotide) and (iii) doxorubicin both loaded into an external coating made of mesoporous titania. The high performance and low toxicity of the deriving nanoparticles were assayed in vitro on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells.59 Being hydrophilic and therefore easily embeddable in silica-based materials, doxorubicin has been exploited as an exemplary anti-cancer compound for a number of in vivo applications as well. Hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles were multi-functionalized with manganese oxide, a sensor for acidic conditions, to obtain a pH responsive MRI agent that detects and responds to the acidic environment of cancer tissues. The relaxation rate of such a compound was proven to increase 11-fold compared to the neutral condition, and is almost 2-fold higher than commercial Gd(III)-based agents, this was integrated with the ultrasonographic function deriving on the hollow structures of the nanoparticles. The same mesopores and hollows could also include doxorubicin, which was delivered intracellularly, bypassing the multidrug resistance of cancer cells and therefore attaining strong in vitro anti-proliferative efficacy.60
The same research group recently published another multimodal nanostructure based on magnetic core/mesoporous silica shell nanoellipsoids coated by a uniform layer of gold nanorods. The latter allows to superimpose to the MRI detection both photo-thermotherapy and optical imaging; furthermore, doxorubicin was electrostatically associated to the negatively charged surface of the nanoellipsoids, in a reversible way, depending on the redox state of the microenvironment. A synergism between photo-thermal and drug therapy was demonstrated at a moderate power intensity at least in vitro, paving the way for in vivo applications.61 Other core-shell structured silica-based nanomaterials have been recently described that couple MRI and fluorescence/luminescence imaging with PDT. For these purposes, a photosensitizer (hematoporphyrin and silicon phthalocyanine dihydroxide) was covalently grafted onto a silica shell grown on a 10 nm core of rare-earth oxide (Ytterium, Gadolinium, Erbium) nanophosphors. Under excitation at 980 nm, this nanomaterial gave luminescence bands at 550 nm and 660 nm: one peak could be used for fluorescence imaging and the other was suitable for the absorption of the photosensitizer to generate singlet oxygen for killing HeLa cancer cells in vitro. On the other side, because of the presence of Gadolinium(III), the inner core proved to act as a good contrast agent, with efficiency comparable to clinical commercial compounds.62 Photothermal agents have also been employed in the design of nonplasmonic multi-dye silica nanoparticles, in which a modified near infrared fluorescent heptamethine cyanine dye is embedded into a mesoporous silica matrix, and a metallo-naphthalocyanine dye is loaded into the pores of these particles.
The imaging and therapeutic capabilities of these nanoparticles were investigated in vivo in a direct tumor injection model. These near infrared fluorescent nanoprobes were extremely brilliant (300-fold enhancement in quantum yield versus free dye). Further, exposure to laser excitation of the naphthalocyanine dye led to a temperature increase of the surrounding environment. As a consequence, tumours co-injected with the nanoparticles were easily visualized, and significantly elevated levels of tumour necrosis (95 %) could be induced upon photothermal ablation.63
3.3 TARGETED IMAGING
A different level of complexity, and a net improvement in nanoprobe specificity for the diseased tissues is achieved by surface-functionalization of the cognate nanoparticles by specific targeting moieties. We recently translated a similar approach in vivo, in a mouse model of human metastatic colorectal cancer. For this purpose, we designed a high-performance imaging platform based on silica-PEG nanoparticles doped with rhodamine B and cyanine 5, with the possibility of obtaining a dual-color simultaneous detection as a basis for background subtraction and signal amplification, thus providing high-sensitivity imaging. The PEG tails on the external face of the nanoparticles were functionalized with metastasis specific peptides (i.e., H2N-CGIYRLRSC-COOH and H2N-CGVYSLRSC-COOH), identified in our laboratory by phage display screenings on human biopsies of liver metastases.64 The deriving nanoprobes selectively homed to and accumulated at target tissues, resulting in specific visualization even of submillimetric metastatic foci.40 Other examples of silica nanoparticles containing more than one fluorophoric species are present in literature to allow the simultaneous imaging of multiple targets. In particular W. Tan and co-authors65 proposed the use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) NPs conjugated with aptamers to perform multiplexed cancer cell monitoring. Three different dyes (a fluorescein and two rhodamines) where used to prepare single-, dual- and triple-dye doped silica nanoparticles with different doping ratios, allowing the tuning of the FRET dependent emission signature of these materials that consequently present different colors under the same excitation (λex=488 nm). The covalent surface-modification with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker terminating with biotin allowed the decoration of the NPs with an external layer of neutravidin. This decreases the inherent nonspecific adsorption onto the cell surface of these materials, and it allows to conveniently immobilize the aptamers of interest by introducing a biotin group in the aptamer sequence. Three specific aptamers for three different cancer cell lines were selected: sgc8 aptamer for CEM cells (which are human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells); TDO5 aptamer against Ramos cells (which are human Burkitt’s lymphoma cells), and T1 aptamer for Toledo cells (which represent a type of human diffuse large cell lymphoma). The simultaneous and sensitive imaging of multiple cancer cell targets was achieved. The same kind of NPs, but singularly doped with FITC or Ru(bpy)32+, were use to conjugate a series of aptamers specific for CEM, Ramos, HeLa and HL-60 and proved to be able to enhance conventional flow cytometry sensitivity the detection of these cancer cells.66
The same authors have also proposed antibody-conjugated dye doped silica nanoparticles: in this case the derivatization is covalent and directly on the surface of the particles. They have proved to be valuable means to label in vitro cultured cancer cells lines through antigen–antibody recognition. In the case of MGC-803 gastric cancer cells a double-labeling process was followed thanks to FITC doped anti-CEA antibody-conjugated and Ru(bpy)32+ doped anti-CK19 antibody-conjugated fluorescent silica nanoparticles.67 In-vitro and ex-vivo experiments incubating the cells with the mixture of the two NPs were imaged using confocal laser scanning microscopy: the green and red signals were simultaneously obtained without crossreactivity by confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. On the other side improved class of Cy5 doped core-shell NPs were obtained employing positive biomolecules such as IgG or polysine conjugated Cy5 as the core material and silica coating it. After conjugation with C-erb-B2 antibody they has been successfully applied to recognize the breast cancer cells through confocal microscopy with high photostability.68
Other silica NPs obtained with different synthetic methods were proposed for breast cancer cells targeting such as Nile Red doped small (diameter circa 35 nm) ORMOSIL NPs69 (see paragraph 2.3), quite large (diameter circa 100 nm) FITC doped mesoporous ones,70 and very large (diameter more than 400 nm) Stöber like ruthenium phenanthroline doped NPs71 or smaller (diameter ~ 45 nm) Ru(bpy)32+ doped ones.72
All these species were conjugated with bio-molecules such as apo-trasferrin or folic acid, as in the first case, or with the monoclonal antibody anti-HER2/neu or the anti-EGFR antibody, as in the last case, in order to specifically target breast cancer cells. Fluorescence microscopy, immunoassay and flow cytometry data evidenced that all the labeling systems, despite their differences (size, morphology, functionalization) were successfully uptaken by the cells and could selectively target cancer ones. Moreover, ORMOSIL NPs due to their small diameter could in principle be use also for in vivo imaging, and to this aim, the authors also prepared PEG-transferrin conjugated derivatives suitable for future in vivo animal experiments.
Another system based on small (20 nm) ORMOSIL NPs is the one presented by N. Prasad and co-workers to target pancreatic cancer cells (Mia-PaCa cells).28 The particles covalently incorporate rhodamine-B and are externally conjugated with different target molecules such as transferring or monoclonal antibodies (anti-claudin 4 and anti-mesothelin). The surface of the NPs can be easily functionalized with different active moieties (amines, carboxylates, etc.) and the cell uptake was carefully evaluated and compared for all surface variations considered using confocal microscope. It resulted extremely poor in the case of on targeted but generically activated species or for normal healthy cells, while significant for Mia-PaCa cells treated with antibody conjugated NPs, this confirming its receptor-mediated nature. Similar results of specificity were obtained for slightly bigger (diameter 75 nm) still rhodamine-B silica probes but modified with anti-HER2 antibody to target ovarian tumor cells73 or with anti-CEA antibody, a tumor marker now routinely used as part of annual medical checkups,74 and also with Ru(bpy)32+ doped galactose-conjugated silica probes able to specifically identify liver cancer cells from blood cells via confocal microscopy.
In the latter case, cell differentiation was proved also via flow cytometry analysis of a mixed heterogeneous cell system and the identification of even very few target cells was successfully registered.75 Ru(bpy)32+ doped particles and mixed cell systems were also exploited by Tao, L. et al.76 to prove the selective detection of colon cancer cells via fluorescent silica nanoparticles conjugated on surface with anti-human epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) antibody. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that Three kinds of colo205 target colon cancer cells were distinguished from sw480 (EpCAM-deficient human colon cells) and NCM460 (normal human colon cells). This targeting system also allow the visualization of the distribution and abundance of EpCAM in cells membrane, and it provides a possibility to quantify special membrane proteins on different regions of the surface of the cell.Very similar NPs still Ru(bpy)32+ doped but anti-IL-6 conjugated were also reported as labels for sensitive immunoassay of protein biomarkers.77
The protein microarray format with a fluorescence scanner proved to have a detection limit for IL-6, proposed as a model analyte, down to 0.1 ng/mL and a linear response till 10 ng/mL. The absence of cross reactivity with co-existing proteins, the versatility and photostability of the nanoprobes indicate a good potential of these materials also in this technique for clinical diagnosis applications.
Other tumor-targeting functionalizations are instead obtained by a covalent linking of natural molecules on the surface of the nanoparticles. Among these, a number of research groups exploited the high affinity of folate for its receptor, a protein upregulated on the surface of different cancer cells. A simple example is provided by silica nanoparticles doped with fluorescein isothiocyanate, which were PEG-conjugated to folate, thus forming folate receptor-targeted fluorescent nanoprobes.
The quantitative analysis of their cellular internalization in vitro demonstrated that the delivery efficiency in the KB cell line (human oral carcinoma, folate receptor-positive cells) is >6-fold higher than that of A549 cells (human lung carcinoma, folate receptor-negative cells), and that this deliver is highly specific, being competed by the addition of free folate.78
Targeting tumors through the folate/folate receptor pair proved to be efficient also in vivo. in this case, a two-photon absorbing and aggregation-enhanced near-infrared emitting pyran derivative was encapsulated in silica nanoparticles, providing a bioimaging that overcomes the fluorescence quenching associated with high chromophore loading.
The surface of these nanoparticles, again, was functionalized with folic acid. In vitro studies confirmed their uptake by HeLa human cervix cancer cells; most importantly, following intravenous injection they showed specific homing to HeLa tumor xenografts in mice, extravasation from the leaky tumor vessels and internalization by the tumor cells. Two-photon fluorescence microscopy bioimaging provided a 3D tumor imaging up to 350 µm deep.79
3.3.1 TARGETED MULTIMODAL IMAGING
Indeed, a selective targeting of malignant cells promises to mitigate side effects of conventional chemotherapy and to enable delivery of the unique drug combinations needed for personalized medicine. Porous silica nanoparticle-supported lipid bilayers were modified with the targeting peptide H2N-SFSIILTPILPLGGC-COOH (identified via filamentous phage display) that binds to human hepatocellular carcinoma cells with a 10,000-fold greater affinity than for either hepatocytes, endothelial or immune cells. These hybrid liposome-silica nanoparticles were provided as versatile carriers to be loaded with combinations of therapeutic and diagnostic agents and modified to achieve endosomal escape and nuclear accumulation.80 Other targeted MRI contrast agents were designed with a core of Fe3O4 and a fluorescent SiO2 shell, obtaining 47.0 ± 4.0 nm nanoparticles that were grafted with hyperbranched polyglycerol and conjugated with folic acid.
Parallel MRI and fluorescence microscopy analyses showed significant preferential uptake of these targeted nanoparticles by human ovarian carcinoma cells (SKOV-3), in comparison with macrophages and fibroblasts, suggesting a potential use for real-time imaging in ovarian cancer resection.81 Other targeting molecules are presently being explored with various specificity. Mesoporous silica nanospheres for MRI were synthesized by covalently linking Gadolinium(III) chelates via a redox-responsive disulfide moiety. These nanospheres were further functionalized with PEG and an anisamide ligand as a targeting moiety. The effectiveness of the deriving probes was evaluated in vitro in human cell lines from colon adenocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. A 3T scanner was used for preliminary in vivo MRI studies, demonstrating that the Gadolinium(III) chelate is rapidly cleaved by the blood pool thiols and eliminated through the renal excretion pathway. Therefore, for translation into clinical imaging, an improved tuning of the chelate release kinetics will be needed to use the tumor-targeted nanoparticles as new MRI contrast agents.82 Antibodies against transmembrane receptors overexpressed in cancer cells are also proving to be useful targeting moieties. In a first example, magneto-fluorescent silica nanoparticles, based on a ferrite core covered by silica-PEG/rhodamine B, were conjugated with the clinical antibody cetuximab, for the targeting and imaging of colon cancers that overexpress the epidermal growth factor receptor. In vivo, the cetuximab-conjugated magneto-fluorescent nanoparticles specifically targeted HCT-116 human colon carcinoma cell subcutaneous xenografts, allowing a detection of specific fluorescence. In parallel, significant MRI signal changes were observed in the same mouse model.83 In a second example, nanoprobes constituted by a core of Fe3O4 (for MRI) and by multiple silica layers embedding visible-fluorescent quantum dots (600 nm emission) and near infrared-fluorescent quantum dots (780 nm emission), were surface-conjugated with an anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) antibody. In vitro, these multimodal nanoparticles bound with high specificity to KPL-4 human breast cancer cells. In vivo, the near-infrared fluorescence imaging and the T(2)-weighted magnetic resonance of KPL-4 xenografts in mice were explored, demonstrating that breast tumors can be successfully identified by fluorescence.84 For similar applications, Raman-silica-gold-nanoparticles were designed, and the acute toxicity and biodistribution of their cognate PEGylated forms was evaluated following different routes of administration in mice. After intravenous administration, these nanoparticles were removed from the circulation by macrophages in the liver and spleen (that is, the reticulo-endothelial system). At 24 hours, they elicited a mild inflammatory response and an increase in oxidative stress in the liver, which subsided by 2 weeks after administration. No evidence of significant toxicity was observed by measuring clinical, histological, biochemical, or cardiovascular parameters for 2 weeks. With the aim of designing targeted nanoparticles, e.g. labeled with an affibody that binds specifically to the epidermal growth factor receptor, to detect colorectal cancer, their local toxicy was tested as well, confirming no significant bowel or systemic toxicity, and no systemic detection.85 Using a different approach, a smart targeting sensor for the tumor microenvironment was designed to be activatable in the presence of tumor metallopeptidase 2, through a specific enzyme substrate bioconjugated with cyanine 5.5 as the external functionalization of iron oxide nanoparticles with thin silica-PEG coating. In this structure, the surface fluorescence was quenched with an efficiency of 97.2%. The presence of metallopeptidase 2 in the medium caused a specific cleavage of the dye-conjugated peptide, thus switching the fluorescence on. In vivo, tumor xenografts obtained by subcutaneous injection of SCC7 human squamous cell carcinoma cells were successfully imaged by both MRI and near infrared fluorescence, following intravenous injection of the targeted nanoparticles. Both signals gradually increased up to 12 h post injection; at this time, the intensity of tumor fluorescence was 3–4 times higher than that in normal tissue, and the maximum difference in the magnetic resonance was 34% between tumor tissue and healthy muscle. The addition of a metallopeptidase inhibitor caused a significant lowering of the fluorescence signals, demonstrating the specificity of this system.86
H. Y. Tsai et al.87 developed a sandwich immunoassay detection system based on labeled nanoparticles. To demonstrate the validity of their approach this methodology was applied to carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) detection in serum. The immunoassay consists of magnetic NPs (80 nm) and silica rhodamine 6G (R6G) doped NPs (180 nm) both labelled with anti-CEA, to obtain a colloidal assembly mediated by the anti-CEA/CEA/anti-CEA interactions. This methodology was faster respect to related ELISA protocols, and thanks to the huge NPs surface available for the CEA recognition processes together with the enhanced fluorescent signal and the separation-purification capabilities induced by the magnetic NPs allowed a CEA detection limit of 1.8 pg/mL, with an very extended linear range (18 ng/mL to 1.8 pg/mL).
Wan, J. et al.88 developed nanoprobes with a magnetic core and silica shell with fluorescent and optical contrast capabilities. This system was conjugated to the NPs surface with chlorotoxin, a targeting ligand for the specific targeting of human U251-MG glioma cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis. This recognition process was monitored by MRI and also by confocal microscopy. Yang, H. et al.89 synthesized bimodal nano-probes (MRI, fluorescent) made by amino functionalized silica-coated manganese oxide NPs (d = 35 nm), that were then conjugate to rhodamine B isothiocyanate dye and targeted to folate moieties.
Several techniques (flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging) showed that this nanocomposites can specifically target cancer cells over expressing folate receptors.
Hwang, D. W. et al.90 developed a multimodal cancer-targeted imaging system for in vivo fluorescence, radionuclide and MR imaging. This nanocomposite was developed starting from a commercial nanoparticles (Biterials - Seoul, Korea, d = 50 nm) comprising a cobalt–ferrite core surrounded by a rhodamine doped carboxy-functionalized silica shell. Conjugation was carried with AS1411 aptamer (MF-AS1411), having targeting capabilities toward nucleolin (a cellular membrane protein highly expressed in cancer), and finally with 2-(p-isothio-cyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclonane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (p-SCN-bn-NOTA) a chelating agent able to bind 67Ga-citrate. Confocal microscopy analysis showed how these NPs can give specific fluorescence signals in nucleolin-expressing C6 cells. Radionuclide imaging was used for tumor imaging in vivo after systemic injection on mice together with fluorescence confocal microscopy. This last technique however revealed severe nonspecific liver accumulation by the mononuclear phagocytic system, even if these nanoparticles were endowed with PEG moieties on their surface to confer stealth properties and longer circulation times.
A multiply-engineered structure, andowed with magnetic, luminescent and recognition properties was developed by Mi Y. et al.91 for applications related to immunomagnetic methods or microfluidic devices for CTC (circulatin tumor cells) sorting and detection. These mesoporous silica NPs loaded with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) scaffold of hydrophobic conjugated fluorescent oligomers (COs) were then decorated on their surface by Iron oxides (IOs) nanoparticles.
The nanohybrid was finally functionalized through adsorption with the targeting ligand herceptin (Trastuzumab), able to recognize the HER2 receptor (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2) overexpressed in the 25–30% of the invasive breast cancer cells. With an overall diameter of 100 nm and a Z-potential value of 12 mV, this nanosystems showed very low citotoxicity (< 20% mortality) towards SK-BR-3 cancer cells and NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells, with an essential contribute of herceptin toward cellular uptake and selective detection.
Tan and coworkers92 used a novel two-nanoparticle assay to develope a method for the rapid collection and detection of leukemia cells. In order to achieve specific recognition these authors functionalized the NPs with an aptamer sequence selected using a cell-based SELEX strategy. This approach allowed specific recognition of CCRF-CEM acute leukemia cells both from complex mixtures and whole blood samples. Magnetic nanoparticles, modified with the aptamer, were used for target cell extraction, while aptamer-modified fluorescent nanoparticles were simultaneously added for sensitive cell detection. Thanks to this combination rapid, selective, and sensitive detection became possible. As demonstrated by fluorescent imaging and flow cytometry a single aptamer binding event, in fact is amplified thanks to the high brightness of the fluorescent NPs with respect to the labelling with individual dye-labeled probes. Functionalized magnetic NPs, on the other hand, allow for rapid extraction of target cells not possible with other separation methods. The same approach was followed for the detection and separation of multiple cancer cells93 in combinations of CCRF-CEM cells (CCL-119 T-cell, human acute lymphoblastic leukemia), Ramos cells (CRL-1596, B-cell, humanBurkitt’s lymphoma), and Toledo cells (CRL-2631, non-Hodgkin’s B cell lymphoma).
3.4 TARGETED THERANOSTIC
As maximum complexity level, several theranostic nanoparticles have been very recently designed that combine imaging, therapy, and targeting. In another example, mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin hydrochloride were surface-functionalized with hyaluronic acid, a specific ligand for cells overexpressing the tumor biomarker CD44 and tested in vitro. In this setting, specific uptake of CD44-targeted fluorescent nanoparticles by HCT-116 human colorectal cancer cells is coupled to enhanced doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity.94 Similarly, carbon and Si nanocrystals, respectively encapsulated in the mesopores and within the framework of mesoporous silica nanoparticles, were bio-conjugated with a PEGylated phospholipid compound and hyaluronic acid. Such nanoparticles further embed high payload of a typical anti-cancer drug, camptothecin. The formed crystals allow unique near infrared-to-visible luminescence imaging feature, while the chemotherapeutic drug is specifically targeted to MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in vitro.95 A number of reports describe nanotheranostic particles in which the targeting moiety is, again, the folate/folate receptor pair. In a first setting, a mixed layer of PEG-conjugated phospholipids is formed on the silica nanoparticle surface and folic acid is surface-linked for targeting. These nanoparticles are covalently bound to the chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel, and embed quantum dots as fluorescence imaging agents. The in vitro characterization was performed on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, confirming specific fluorescence uptake and drug-mediated toxicity.91 Translation in vivo of such targeted nanotheranostics represents the most important preclinical step toward the clinical application, and has been explored for a number of particle variants. Among the most recent and better characterized, mesoporous-silica-coated upconversion fluorescent nanoparticles were used as a carrier of two photosensitizers (for photodynamic therapy) and of a nanotransducer (to convert deeply penetrating near-infrared light to visible wavelengths). The multicolor-emission properties of such nanoparticles, at a single excitation wavelength for a simultaneous activation of the two photosensitizers, provides an improved photodynamic therapy. In vivo, this system is highly efficient when injected intratumorally in a mouse model of human melanoma, or when a folate acid-functionalized counterpart is administered intravenously into tumor-bearing mice. This is the first demonstration of a validated multimodal, targeted nanoparticle, for innovative combination of phototherapy and optical detection, serving as a platform for future noninvasive deep-cancer therapy.96
An interesting multimodal system with multiple core-shell architecture was developed by Wang, F. et al.97. Following a reverse microemulsion strategy a 6 nm diameter Fe3O4 core was coated with a FITC-APTES doped silica shell of about 17 nm. The deposition of a 9 nm second mesoporous silica layer covalently doped with the PDT agent aluminum phthalocyanine (AlC4Pc), was obtained through a CTAB modified Stöber method. These NPs were addressed as specific PDT using folic acid targeting ligands conjugated to the mesoporous silica shell, this ligand is able to recognize the over-expressed α-folate receptor in many cancer cells.
The system take advantage of the MRI and optical contrast properties endowed by the magnetic core, and of the sensitivity of fluorescence imaging, while folate receptors increase the directing specificity of the system to cancer cells, reducing the effect of PDT processes on normal tissues. The cellular uptake and the contrast effect of these NPs was evaluated on human hepatoma cells (QGY-7703) and the relative cell viabilities was measured on human hepatocyte cells (QSG-7701). The efficiency of the PDT was evaluated finally on QGY-7703 cells, and the obtained results indicated the key role of light in killing tumor cells in vitro.
A preferential uptake of folate targeted NPs compared to untargeted ones was measured on Human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells, and thank to this increased affinity the first system was more efficient in promoting Hela cells death by PDT.
Lu and coworkers prepared multifunctional biocompatible and water-soluble magnetic NPs for the detection of Human hepatoma 7402 and H446 lung cancer cell lines.98 These NPs have a mesoporous core-shell structure and bear a rhodamine containing polymer chain as a labelling segment while folic acid is used as the cancer targeting moiety. Moreover the porous silica oxide structure and long molecular chains of polymethacrylic acid are suitable to efficiently host drug molecules allowing to use the nanocomposites for directional release. The loading, on the other hand, did not affect the magnetic properties of the carrier and the release of the loaded drug was observed over 100 h under in vitro conditions. The authors also reported that, their NPs penetrate into the cell membranes and release the anticancer drug into the cytoplasm and that they effectively target the tumor cells.
A similar multifunctional approach was followed by Lo and coworkers who reported the synthesis and application of tri-functionalized mesoporous silica NPs for use as theranostic compounds able to combine imaging, target and therapy.99 These NPs were functionalized in a first steps with a NIR emitting dye, ATTO647N, that enable optical detection of particle targeting. was chosen in order to exploit.In a second step, an oxygen-sensing, palladium-porphyrin based photosensitizer (Pd-porphyrin; PdTPP) for photodynamic therapy was incorporated into the nanochannels of the mesoporous NPs. Finally cRGDyK peptides, were used for targeting the overexpressed αvβ3 integrins of cancer cells, and to ensure the internalization of the photosensitizer PdTPP. In vitro application of this theranostic platform was demonstrated for MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and U87-MG human glioblastoma cells.
4. SILICA-BASED NANOPARTICLES IN CLINICAL TRIALS
To be clinically successful, the next generation of nanoparticle agents should exhibit favorable targeting and clearance profiles, and be nontoxic. Developing probes that meet these criteria is challenging and requires extensive in vivo evaluations. Only a relatively small percentage of new imaging agents undergoing comprehensive preclinical testing potentially satisfy diagnostic criteria for translation. Indeed, although a number of fluorescent particle platforms have been investigated, only Cornell dots (C dots) have received the first FDA-approved investigational new drug approval for a first-in-human clinical trial (Jan 2011). Bradbury and coworkers100 report that these dye-encapsulating ~7-nm particles, surface functionalized with the αvβ3 integrin-targeting cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (cRGDY) peptides and radioiodine, exhibit high-affinity/avidity binding, favorable tumor-to-blood residence time ratios, and enhanced tumor-selective accumulation in melanoma xenografts in mice. They further exploited the sensitive, real-time imaging of lymphatic drainage and nodal metastases obtained with this multimodal platform for staging metastatic disease in the clinical setting. The feasibility of performing intraoperative image-guided metastatic disease detection, localization, and staging was evaluated in a larger-animal (miniswine) spontaneous melanoma model, that simulates more accurately the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures in humans. Mapping of sentinel lymph nodes was achieved by using portable, real-time optical camera systems in an intra-operative setting for direct visualization of the draining tumor lymphatics and fluorescent nanoparticles. This work demonstrates that C dots combine the benefits of PET (tissue penetration, quantification) with those of IR/NIR optical imaging (sensitivity/contrast, multispectral capabilities) for the development of surgically-based or interventionally-driven therapies.55,101 Discussions have begun with the FDA to start clinical trials using carbon nanotubes to improve colorectal cancer imaging. This imaging agent and associated is being developed by the Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence Focused on Therapy Response (Stanford University CCNE). (Source: NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer)
5. SILICA-BASED NANOPARTICLES IN CHILDREN TUMORS
An extremely small number of reports have been produced describing the application of silica-based nanotheranostics to the diagnosis and therapy of children tumors. There is therefore an urgent medical need for innovative, nanomedicine approaches to be translated into the clinics, especially for the poor-prognosis tumors neuroblastoma and glioblastoma, and for retinoblastoma.
High-risk neuroblastoma is associated with the worst outcome in pediatric oncology, because the initial remission in response to chemotherapy is followed by a recurrence that has become refractory to further treatment. Recently, silica nanoparticle-based targeted delivery of a tumor suppressive, proapoptotic microRNA, miR-34a, to neuroblastoma tumors in a murine orthotopic xenograft model has been described. Nanoparticles were functionalized with an antibody recognizing the cancer-specific cell surface antigen disialoganglioside GD2, providing tumor-specific delivery. The specific targeting of these modular nanoparticles to tumor sites in a mouse model was demonstrated, which paralleled with significantly decreased tumor growth, increased apoptosis and a reduction in vascularisation.102
Another silica-based multimodal nanosystem has been developed that combines imaging with photodynamic therapy of glioblastoma. To promote the vascular effects commonly associated to photodynamic therapy, nanoparticles were functionalized with a specific peptide ligand for the tumor angiogenic marker neuropilin-1. For the MRI imaging, these polysiloxane nanoparticles were further surface-bound with gadolinium chelated by DOTA derivatives, while chlorin was used as photosensitizer. In vivo, i.e. after intravenous injection in rats bearing intracranial U87-derived glioblastoma xenografts, a positive MRI contrast enhancement was specifically observed in tumor tissue.103 Alternative systems for glioblastoma imaging by MRI have been developed that allow for dual-contrast T(1)- and T(2)-weighted targeted MRI. These silica-coated iron oxide core-shell nanoparticles have a diameter of ~21 nm, and exhibit a surface functionalization with amine (for the covalent conjugation of a paramagnetic gadolinium complex with DTPA) and, again, with αvβ3 integrin-targeting RGD peptides. Validation was performed both in vitro and in vivo, in mouse models obtained by subcutaneous implant of U87 human glioblastoma cells, demonstrating a specific visualization of αvβ3 integrin-expressing tumor massed by dual-contrast imaging.104
Photodynamic therapy has been successfully associated to chemotherapy in an in vitro model of retinoblastoma, a rare disease of childhood and a most common intraocular pediatric tumor. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles were designed, conjugating the presence of a therapeutic agent (camptothecin) with either fluorescein (for confocal microscopy evaluation of cell uptake) or a porphyrin-based photosensitizer (for one- or two-photon excited photodynamic therapy).
In this case, a specific targeting of cancer cells was achieved by covering the nanoparticle surfaces with a mannose derivative that binds the lectins overexpressed by cancer cells. This targeted bi-therapy was efficient in inducing retinoblastoma cancer cell death in vitro, as a basis for future preclinical applications.105
6. CONCLUSIONS
Fluorescence imaging techniques are becoming essential in biomedical applications and the research of suitable tools for in vitro and in vivo measurements is gaining more and more importance and attention. Nanotechnology is supplying many solutions for present limitations of the field and, in particular, luminescent nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the most promising materials proposed for future diagnostic implementations.
Bio-conjugated fluorescent silica NPs have been extensively studied in the last decades and literature reports clear advantages of these materials in comparison with single fluorophore labelling in diagnostics, and lately also in theranostic. In this contribution we have focussed our attention only dye doped silica or silica-based NPs conjugated with targeting moiety to enable specific cancer cells imaging. The results presented demonstrate that they are versatile and convenient platforms for targeted labelling presenting higher solubility and lower cytotoxicity in comparison with the majority of dyes in solution. Most interestingly they also offer higher brightness and photostability, two key points in fluorescent imaging. On the other hand, their drawbacks have been mostly addressed and now synthetic reproducibility can be successfully obtained, so as very small dimensions (< 30 nm) to allow facile cellular uptake.
It is important to underline that one of the most valuable characteristics of silica nanoparticles is the possibility to use them to merge different materials, to combine various funtionalities, that is to say to act as a basis to obtain multifunctional medicine dedicated nanoplatforms enabling multimodal imaging and simultaneous diagnosis and therapy.
However, the development of nanostructured targeted labels in general, and for medical applications in particular, already is a very hard and interdisciplinary task, but the translation to clinics is even harder. It also depends, in fact, on safety, costs and conditions of production processes that are stringent and the benefits that the use of fluorescent silica nanoparticles can offer must greatly counterbalance any possible.
The results presented in the examples selected in this review, in our opinion, point out the specific, rare and many advantages that these unique materials may introduce in clinical applications like early diagnosis, functional imaging, guided surgery, theranostic. All this make us envisage new clinical uses of fluorescent multifunctional silica-based medicine dedicated nanoplatforms in the next future since now applications are unfortunately still rare.
Figure 1.
a) Schematic representation of the structures and structure-related theranostic functions of the mesoporous particles; b) TEM image of NPs (inset: the STEM image with scale bar = 100 nm); c-f) Element mapping of Si (c), O (d) and Mn (e) in NPs (f: color merged image of c, d and e). Adapted from ref. [60].
Figure 2.

Reaction scheme for the synthesis of MDT-NPs. (Left) Hexagonal array of C16TAB cylindrical micelles. (Center) NIRF silica nanoparticles formed by co-condensation of modified IR780-APTES dye conjugate with TEOS. (Right) MDT-NPs synthesized by encapsulation of Si-naphthalocyanine dye within the pores of mesoporous NIRF particles. Abbreviations: APTES, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane; C16TAB, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; DMF, N, N-dimethylformamide; IR780, IR780 iodide; MDT-NPs, multi-dye theranostic silica nanoparticles; NIRF, near-infrared fluorescence; TEOS, tetraethyl orthosilicate. Adapted from ref. [63].
Figure 3.

Fluorescent dye-doped silica NPs: scheme illustrating the surface modification of the fluorescent silica NPs with PEG and neutravidin. Adapted from ref. [66].
Figure 4.
Schematic illustration of routes for the bio-conjugation of ORMOSIL nanoparticles. Adapted from ref. [69].
Figure 5.

Scheme of conjugation of Dye@MSNs with Herceptin through multistep modification and MSNs. TEM images: (left) Dye@MSN-SH; (right) Her-Dye@MSN. Adapted from ref. [70].
Figure 6.
Schematic representation of antibody immobilization process onto functionalized fluorescent core-shell nanoparticles and TEM image of TRITC fluorescent nanoparticles. Adapted from ref. [73].
Figure 7.

Schematic illustration of the synthetic procedure and TEM image of Rubpy doped silica (RuDS). Adapted from ref. [77].
Figure 8.
Schematic diagram of the preparation of nanoparticles-(fluorescein isothiocyanate)-polyethylene glycol-Folate (NPs[FITC]-PEG-Folate) particles. (A) The maleimide end of maleimide-FITC (Mal-FITC) reacts with thiol groups of 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPS) to form stable thioester linkages. (B) Folate was activated with ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide and reacted with NH2-PEG-maleimide to form a reactive intermediate (maleimide-PEG-Folate), then the NPs(FITC) particles react with maleimide-PEG-Folate to produce NPs(FITC)-PEG-Folate particles. Abbreviations: C3F8, octafluoropropane; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. Adapted from ref. [78].
Figure 9.

Molecular structure of DFP (left), the florescence emission of DFP (5 × 10−6 mol·L−1) in THF and the THF/water mixture (90% volume fraction of water, ca. 20 nm nanoparticle suspension) under 500 nm laser excitation (middle), and the relative fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) of DFP (5 × 10−6 mol·L−1) vs water fraction in THF (right). Adapted from ref. [79].
Figure 10.
Synthetic route of folic acid-conjugated HPG-grafted Fe3O4@SiO2 fluorescent nanoparticles: (I) overview of the synthetic strategy and (II) chemical synthesis. Adapted from ref. [81].
Figure 11.

Schematic illustration of the formation of MnO@SiO2 (RBITC)-FA nanocomposities. Adapted from ref. [89].
Figure 12.

(left) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) scaffold of hydrophobic conjugated oligomers (COs) loaded into silica nanoparticles; Iron oxides (IOs) nanoparticles conjugated to the silica surface; herceptin coating through adsorption. (A) Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) image and (B) transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of the POSS-COs loaded silica NPs with no IO layered on the nanoparticle surface. (C) and (D) TEM images of the POSS-COs loaded silica NPs of the Fe3O4 IO surface layer. Adapted from ref. [91].
Figure 13.

Synthetic procedure of Fe3O4@SiO2(F)@meso-SiO2(P)-Folate nanoparticles and TEM images of Fe3O4 (left) Fe3O4@SiO2(F) (centre) and Fe3O4@SiO2(F)@meso-SiO2(P) (right). Adapted from ref. [98].
Figure 14.
Structures of MSN-FITC, MSN-PS, MSN-2hν, MSN-FITC-man, MSN-PS-man and MSN-2hν-man nanoparticles. The carbohydrate moiety (ν-d-mannose, man)was covalently anchored on the surface of the MSN. Adapted from ref. [107].
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR, grant PRIN 2009Z9ASCA), by the program NanoSci-E+ (financed project "INOFEO"), by the ERC starting grant “Mosaic”, Italian Association for Cancer Research - My First AIRC Grant (AIRC-MFAG), Banca d’Alba, Piedmont Region (Finalized Health Research Under 40) and Piedmont Foundation for Cancer Research (FPRC) Intramural Grant 5x1000 2008.
REFERENCES
- 1.Prodi L. Luminescent chemosensors: from molecules to nanoparticles. New Journal of Chemistry. 2005;29:20–31. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shi DL. Integrated Multifunctional Nanosystems for Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009;19:3356–3373. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yong KT, Roy I, Swihart MT, Prasad PN. Multifunctional nanoparticles as biocompatible targeted probes for human cancer diagnosis and therapy. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009;19:4655–4672. doi: 10.1039/b817667c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gunasekera UA, Pankhurst QA, Douek M. Imaging applications of nanotechnology in cancer. Targeted Oncology. 2009;4:169–181. doi: 10.1007/s11523-009-0118-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gong YK, Nakashima K. Penetration of pyrene and its derivatives into polystyrene latex particles as studied by fluorescence spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2001:1772–1773. doi: 10.1039/b105959a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Katz LC, Burkhalter A, Dreyer WJ. Fluorescent latex microspheres as a retrograde neuronal marker for in vivo and in vitro studies of visual cortex. Nature. 1984;310:498–500. doi: 10.1038/310498a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prilloff S, Fan JY, Henrich-Noack P, Sabel BA. In vivo confocal neuroimaging (ICON): non-invasive, functional imaging of the mammalian CNS with cellular resolution. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010;31:521–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Burns A, Ow H, Wiesner U. Fluorescent core-shell silica nanoparticles: towards “Lab on a Particle” architectures for nanobiotechnology. Chemical Society Reviews. 2006;35:1028–1042. doi: 10.1039/b600562b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Medintz IL, Uyeda HT, Goldman ER, Mattoussi H. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. Nat. Mater. 2005;4:435–446. doi: 10.1038/nmat1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bae W, Tan W, Hong J-I. Fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles: new tools for bioapplications. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:2270–2282. doi: 10.1039/c2cc16306c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang L, Wang KM, Santra S, Zhao XJ, Hilliard LR, Smith JE, Wu JR, Tan WH. Watching silica nanoparticles glow in the biological world. Analytical Chemistry. 2006;78:646–654. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Benezra M, Penate-Medina O, Zanzonico PB, Schaer D, Ow H, Burns A, DeStanchina E, Longo V, Herz E, Iyer S, Wolchok J, Larson SM, Wiesner U, Bradbury MS. Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:2768–2780. doi: 10.1172/JCI45600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bonacchi S, Genovese D, Juris R, Montalti M, Prodi L, Rampazzo E, Zaccheroni N. Luminescent Silica Nanoparticles: Extending the Frontiers of Brightness. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition. 2011;50:4056–4066. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bonacchi S, Genovese D, Juris R, Montalti M, Prodi L, Rampazzo E, Sgarzi M, Zaccheroni N. Prodi L, Montalti M, Zaccheroni N, editors. Luminescence Applied in Sensor Science. 2011;300:93–138. doi: 10.1007/128_2010_104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ambrogio MW, Thomas CR, Zhao YL, Zink JI, Stoddartt JF. Mechanized Silica Nanoparticles: A New Frontier in Theranostic Nanomedicine. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2011;44:903–913. doi: 10.1021/ar200018x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rosenholm JM, Sahlgren C, Linden M. Towards multifunctional, targeted drug delivery systems using mesoporous silica nanoparticles - opportunities & challenges. Nanoscale. 2010;2:1870–1883. doi: 10.1039/c0nr00156b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zanarini S, Rampazzo E, Ciana LD, Marcaccio M, Marzocchi E, Montalti M, Paolucci F, Prodi L. Ru(bpy)3 Covalently Doped Silica Nanoparticles as Multicenter Tunable Structures for Electrochemiluminescence Amplification. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:2260–2267. doi: 10.1021/ja8077158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bagwe RP, Yang C, Hilliard LR, Tan W. Optimization of Dye-Doped Silica Nanoparticles Prepared Using a Reverse Microemulsion Method. Langmuir. 2004;20:8336–8342. doi: 10.1021/la049137j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zanarini S, Rampazzo E, Bonacchi S, Juris R, Marcaccio M, Montalti M, Paolucci F, Prodi L. Iridium Doped Silica−PEG Nanoparticles: Enabling Electrochemiluminescence of Neutral Complexes in Aqueous Media. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:14208–14209. doi: 10.1021/ja906666e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Van Blaaderen A, Imhof A, Hage W, Vrij A. Three-dimensional imaging of submicrometer colloidal particles in concentrated suspensions using confocal scanning laser microscopy. Langmuir. 1992;8:1514–1517. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Verhaegh NAM, Blaaderen Av. Dispersions of Rhodamine-Labeled Silica Spheres: Synthesis, Characterization, and Fluorescence Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy. Langmuir. 1994;10:1427–1438. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang J, Sugawara-Narutaki A, Fukao M, Yokoi T, Shimojima A, Okubo T. Two-Phase Synthesis of Monodisperse Silica Nanospheres with Amines or Ammonia Catalyst and Their Controlled Self-Assembly. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2011;3:1538–1544. doi: 10.1021/am200104m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Montalti M, Prodi L, Zaccheroni N, Zattoni A, Reschiglian P, Falini G. Energy Transfer in Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2004;20:2989–2991. doi: 10.1021/la0361868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bagwe RP, Hilliard LR, Tan W. Surface Modification of Silica Nanoparticles to Reduce Aggregation and Nonspecific Binding. Langmuir. 2006;22:4357–4362. doi: 10.1021/la052797j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Arriagada FJ, Osseo-Asare K. Synthesis of Nanosize Silica in Aerosol OT Reverse Microemulsions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1995;170:8–17. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ohulchanskyy TY, Roy I, Goswami LN, Chen Y, Bergey EJ, Pandey RK, Oseroff AR, Prasad PN. Organically Modified Silica Nanoparticles with Covalently Incorporated Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Nano Letters. 2007;7:2835–2842. doi: 10.1021/nl0714637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kumar R, Roy I, Ohulchanskky TY, Vathy LA, Bergey EJ, Sajjad M, Prasad PN. In Vivo Biodistribution and Clearance Studies Using Multimodal Organically Modified Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4:699–708. doi: 10.1021/nn901146y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kumar R, Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Goswami LN, Bonoiu AC, Bergey EJ, Tramposch KM, Maitra A, Prasad PN. Covalently Dye-Linked, Surface-Controlled, and Bioconjugated Organically Modified Silica Nanoparticles as Targeted Probes for Optical Imaging. ACS Nano. 2008;2:449–456. doi: 10.1021/nn700370b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Bharali DJ, Pudavar HE, Mistretta RA, Kaur N, Prasad PN. Optical tracking of organically modified silica nanoparticles as DNA carriers: A nonviral, nanomedicine approach for gene delivery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:279–284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408039101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bharali DJ, Klejbor I, Stachowiak EK, Dutta P, Roy I, Kaur N, Bergey EJ, Prasad PN, Stachowiak MK. Organically modified silica nanoparticles: A nonviral vector for in vivo gene delivery and expression in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:11539–11544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504926102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim S, Huang H, Pudavar HE, Cui Y, Prasad PN. Intraparticle Energy Transfer and Fluorescence Photoconversion in Nanoparticles: An Optical Highlighter Nanoprobe for Two-Photon Bioimaging. Chemistry of Materials. 2007;19:5650–5656. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim S, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE, Pandey RK, Prasad PN. Organically Modified Silica Nanoparticles Co-encapsulating Photosensitizing Drug and Aggregation-Enhanced Two-Photon Absorbing Fluorescent Dye Aggregates for Two-Photon Photodynamic Therapy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:2669–2675. doi: 10.1021/ja0680257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE, Bergey EJ, Oseroff AR, Morgan J, Dougherty TJ, Prasad PN. Ceramic-Based Nanoparticles Entrapping Water-Insoluble Photosensitizing Anticancer Drugs: A Novel Drug−Carrier System for Photodynamic Therapy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125:7860–7865. doi: 10.1021/ja0343095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Law W-C, Yong K-T, Roy I, Xu G, Ding H, Bergey EJ, Zeng H, Prasad PN. Optically and Magnetically Doped Organically Modified Silica Nanoparticles as Efficient Magnetically Guided Biomarkers for Two-Photon Imaging of Live Cancer Cells†. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:7972–7977. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rampazzo E, Bonacchi S, Montalti M, Prodi L, Zaccheroni N. Self-Organizing Core−Shell Nanostructures: Spontaneous Accumulation of Dye in the Core of Doped Silica Nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:14251–14256. doi: 10.1021/ja073150j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rampazzo E, Boschi F, Bonacchi S, Juris R, Montalti M, Zaccheroni N, Prodi L, Calderan L, Rossi B, Becchi S, Sbarbati A. Multicolor core/shell silica nanoparticles for in vivo and ex vivo imaging. Nanoscale. 2012;4:824–830. doi: 10.1039/c1nr11401h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Knop K, Hoogenboom R, Fischer D, Schubert US. Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010;49:6288–6308. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang P, Zhao D, Margolese DI, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD. Generalized syntheses of large-pore mesoporous metal oxides with semicrystalline frameworks. Nature. 1998;396:152–155. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Desai PR, Jain NJ, Sharma RK, Bahadur P. Effect of additives on the micellization of PEO/PPO/PEO block copolymer F127 in aqueous solution. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2001;178:57–69. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Soster M, Juris R, Bonacchi S, Genovese D, Montalti M, Rampazzo E, Zaccheroni N, Garagnani P, Bussolino F, Prodi L, Marchio S. Targeted dual-color silica nanoparticles provide univocal identification of micrometastases in preclinical models of colorectal cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:4797–4807. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S33825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Santra S, Dutta D, Walter GA, Moudgil BM. Fluorescent nanoparticle probes for cancer imaging. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 2005;4:593–602. doi: 10.1177/153303460500400603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yan J, Estevez MC, Smith JE, Wang K, He X, Wang L, Tan W. Dye-doped nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Nano Today. 2007;2:44–50. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cheon J, Lee J-H. Synergistically Integrated Nanoparticles as Multimodal Probes for Nanobiotechnology. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:1630–1640. doi: 10.1021/ar800045c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liong M, Lu J, Kovochich M, Xia T, Ruehm SG, Nel AE, Tamanoi F, Zink JI. Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery. Acs Nano. 2008;2:889–896. doi: 10.1021/nn800072t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tallury P, Payton K, Santra S. Silica-based multimodal/multifunctional nanoparticles for bioimaging and biosensing applications. Nanomedicine. 2008;3:579–592. doi: 10.2217/17435889.3.4.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Taylor-Pashow KML, Della Rocca J, Huxford RC, Lin W. Hybrid nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:5832–5849. doi: 10.1039/c002073g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee JE, Lee N, Kim T, Kim J, Hyeon T. Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica Nanocomposite Nanoparticles for Theranostic Applications. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2011;44:893–902. doi: 10.1021/ar2000259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu Y, Lou C, Yang H, Shi M, Miyoshi H. Silica Nanoparticles as Promising Drug/Gene Delivery Carriers and Fluorescent Nano-Probes: Recent Advances. Current Cancer Drug Targets. 2011;11:156–163. doi: 10.2174/156800911794328411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cheng K, Cheng Z. Near Infrared Receptor-Targeted Nanoprobes for Early Diagnosis of Cancers. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;19:4767–4785. doi: 10.2174/092986712803341458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Josefsen LB, Boyle RW. Unique Diagnostic and Therapeutic Roles of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines in Photodynamic Therapy, Imaging and Theranostics. Theranostics. 2012;2:916–966. doi: 10.7150/thno.4571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Merian J, Gravier J, Navarro F, Texier I. Fluorescent Nanoprobes Dedicated to in Vivo Imaging: From Preclinical Validations to Clinical Translation. Molecules. 2012;17:5564–5591. doi: 10.3390/molecules17055564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Probst J, Dembski S, Milde M, Rupp S. Luminescent nanoparticles and their use for in vitro and in vivo diagnostics. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2012;12:49–64. doi: 10.1586/erm.11.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schulz A, McDonagh C. Intracellular sensing and cell diagnostics using fluorescent silica nanoparticles. Soft Matter. 2012;8:2579–2585. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yang F, Jin C, Subedi S, Lee CL, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Li J, Di Y, Fu D. Emerging inorganic nanomaterials for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2012;38:566–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tan H, Wang M, Yang CT, Pant S, Bhakoo KK, Wong SY, Chen ZK, Li X, Wang J. Silica nanocapsules of fluorescent conjugated polymers and superparamagnetic nanocrystals for dual-mode cellular imaging. Chemistry. 2011;17:6696–6706. doi: 10.1002/chem.201003632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yanli W, Xianzhu X, Qun T, Yongxiu L. A new type of silica-coated Gd 2 (CO 3 ) 3 :Tb nanoparticle as a bifunctional agent for magnetic resonance imaging and fluorescent imaging. Nanotechnology. 2012;23:205103. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/20/205103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim JS, Kim YH, Kim JH, Kang KW, Tae EL, Youn H, Kim D, Kim SK, Kwon JT, Cho MH, Lee YS, Jeong JM, Chung JK, Lee DS. Development and in vivo imaging of a PET/MRI nanoprobe with enhanced NIR fluorescence by dye encapsulation. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2012;7:219–229. doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang Z, Wang L, Wang J, Jiang X, Li X, Hu Z, Ji Y, Wu X, Chen C. Mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods as a light-mediated multifunctional theranostic platform for cancer treatment. Adv Mater. 2012;24:1418–1423. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang Y, Chen L, Liu P. Biocompatible triplex Ag@SiO2 @mTiO2 core-shell nanoparticles for simultaneous fluorescence-SERS bimodal imaging and drug delivery. Chemistry. 2012;18:5935–5943. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen Y, Yin Q, Ji X, Zhang S, Chen H, Zheng Y, Sun Y, Qu H, Wang Z, Li Y, Wang X, Zhang K, Zhang L, Shi J. Manganese oxide-based multifunctionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH-responsive MRI, ultrasonography and circumvention of MDR in cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7126–7137. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ma M, Chen H, Chen Y, Wang X, Chen F, Cui X, Shi J. Au capped magnetic core/mesoporous silica shell nanoparticles for combined photothermo-/chemo-therapy and multimodal imaging. Biomaterials. 2012;33:989–998. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Qiao XF, Zhou JC, Xiao JW, Wang YF, Sun LD, Yan CH. Triple-functional core-shell structured upconversion luminescent nanoparticles covalently grafted with photosensitizer for luminescent, magnetic resonance imaging and photodynamic therapy in vitro. Nanoscale. 2012;4:4611–4623. doi: 10.1039/c2nr30938f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Singh AK, Hahn MA, Gutwein LG, Rule MC, Knapik JA, Moudgil BM, Grobmyer SR, Brown SC. Multi-dye theranostic nanoparticle platform for bioimaging and cancer therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2739–2750. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S28357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Marchio S, Soster M, Cardaci S, Muratore A, Bartolini A, Barone V, Ribero D, Monti M, Bovino P, Sun J, Giavazzi R, Asioli S, Cassoni P, Capussotti L, Pucci P, Bugatti A, Rusnati M, Pasqualini R, Arap W, Bussolino F. A complex of alpha(6) integrin and E-cadherin drives liver metastasis of colorectal cancer cells through hepatic angiopoietin-like 6. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4:1156–1175. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201101164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chen X, Estevez MC, Zhu Z, Huang Y-F, Chen Y, Wang L, Tan W. Using Aptamer-Conjugated Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Nanoparticles for Multiplexed Cancer Cell Monitoring. Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2009;81:7009–7014. doi: 10.1021/ac9011073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Estevez MC, O’Donoghue MB, Chen X, Tan W. Highly fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles increase flow cytometry sensitivity for cancer cell monitoring. Nano Res. 2009;2:448–461. [Google Scholar]
- 67.He X, Ge J, Wang K, Tan W, Shi H, He C. FSiNPs mediated improved double immunofluorescence staining for gastric cancer cells imaging. Talanta. 2008;76:1199–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.He X, Chen J, Wang K, Qin D, Tan W. Preparation of luminescent Cy5 doped core-shell SFNPs and its application as a near-infrared fluorescent marker. Talanta. 2007;72:1519–1526. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Qian J, Li X, Wei M, Gao X, Xu Z, He S. Bio-molecule-conjugated fluorescent organically modified silica nanoparticles as optical probes for cancer cell imaging. Opt. Express. 2008;16:19568–19578. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.019568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tsai C-P, Chen C-Y, Hung Y, Chang F-H, Mou C-Y. Monoclonal antibody-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) for selective targeting breast cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:5737–5743. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rossi LM, Shi LF, Rosenzweig N, Rosenzweig Z. Fluorescent silica nanospheres for digital counting bioassay of the breast cancer marker HER2/nue. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2006;21:1900–1906. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hun X, Zhang Z. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody conjugated fluorescent nanoparticles probe for breast cancer imaging. Spectrochimica Acta Part a-Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2009;74:410–414. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Huang S-S, Li R-N, Qu Y-X, Shen J, Liu J. Fluorescent Biological Label for Recognizing Human Ovarian Tumor Cells Based on Fluorescent Nanoparticles. J. Fluoresc. 2009;19:1095–1101. doi: 10.1007/s10895-009-0509-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cao F, Deng R, Liu D, Song S, Wang S, Su S, Zhang H. Fabrication of fluorescent silica-Au hybrid nanostructures for targeted imaging of tumor cells. Dalton Transactions. 2011;40:4800–4802. doi: 10.1039/c1dt10106d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Peng J, Wang K, Tan W, He X, He C, Wu P, Liu F. Identification of live liver cancer cells in a mixed cell system using galactose-conjugated fluorescent nanoparticles. Talanta. 2007;71:833–840. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tao L, Zhang K, Sun Y, Jin B, Zhang Z, Yang K. Anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule monoclonal antibody conjugated fluorescent nanoparticle biosensor for sensitive detection of colon cancer cells. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2012;35:186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wu H, Huo Q, Varnum S, Wang J, Liu G, Nie Z, Liu J, Lin Y. Dye-doped silica nanoparticle labels/protein microarray for detection of protein biomarkers. Analyst. 2008;133:1550–1555. doi: 10.1039/b719810h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yang H, Lou C, Xu M, Wu C, Miyoshi H, Liu Y. Investigation of folate-conjugated fluorescent silica nanoparticles for targeting delivery to folate receptor-positive tumors and their internalization mechanism. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2023–2032. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S24792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wang X, Morales AR, Urakami T, Zhang L, Bondar MV, Komatsu M, Belfield KD. Folate receptor-targeted aggregation-enhanced near-IR emitting silica nanoprobe for one-photon in vivo and two-photon ex vivo fluorescence bioimaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2011;22:1438–1450. doi: 10.1021/bc2002506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ashley CE, Carnes EC, Phillips GK, Padilla D, Durfee PN, Brown PA, Hanna TN, Liu J, Phillips B, Carter MB, Carroll NJ, Jiang X, Dunphy DR, Willman CL, Petsev DN, Evans DG, Parikh AN, Chackerian B, Wharton W, Peabody DS, Brinker CJ. The targeted delivery of multicomponent cargos to cancer cells by nanoporous particle-supported lipid bilayers. Nat Mater. 2011;10:389–397. doi: 10.1038/nmat2992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wang L, Neoh KG, Kang ET, Shuter B. Multifunctional polyglycerol-grafted Fe(3)O(4)@SiO(2) nanoparticles for targeting ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2166–2173. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Vivero-Escoto JL, Taylor-Pashow KM, Huxford RC, Della Rocca J, Okoruwa C, An H, Lin W. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanospheres with cleavable Gd(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: synthesis, characterization, target-specificity, and renal clearance. Small. 2011;7:3519–3528. doi: 10.1002/smll.201100521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Cho Y-S, Yoon T-J, Jang E-S, Soo Hong K, Young Lee S, Ran Kim O, Park C, Kim Y-J, Yi G-C, Chang K. Cetuximab-conjugated magneto-fluorescent silica nanoparticles for in vivo colon cancer targeting and imaging. Cancer Letters. 2010;299:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ma Q, Nakane Y, Mori Y, Hasegawa M, Yoshioka Y, Watanabe TM, Gonda K, Ohuchi N, Jin T. Multilayered, core/shell nanoprobes based on magnetic ferric oxide particles and quantum dots for multimodality imaging of breast cancer tumors. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8486–8494. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Thakor AS, Luong R, Paulmurugan R, Lin FI, Kempen P, Zavaleta C, Chu P, Massoud TF, Sinclair R, Gambhir SS. The fate and toxicity of Raman-active silica-gold nanoparticles in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:79ra33. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Cha EJ, Jang ES, Sun IC, Lee IJ, Ko JH, Kim YI, Kwon IC, Kim K, Ahn CH. Development of MRI/NIRF ‘activatable’ multimodal imaging probe based on iron oxide nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2011;155:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tsai HY, Chang CY, Li YC, Chu WC, Viswanathan K, Bor FC. Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using functional magnetic and fluorescent nanoparticles in magnetic separators. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011;13:2461–2467. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wan J, Meng X, Liu E, Chen K. Incorporation of magnetite nanoparticle clusters in fluorescent silica nanoparticles for high-performance brain tumor delineation. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:235104/235101–235104/235108. S235104/235101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/23/235104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yang H, Zhuang Y, Hu H, Du X, Zhang C, Shi X, Wu H, Yang S. Silica-Coated Manganese Oxide Nanoparticles as a Platform for Targeted Magnetic Resonance and Fluorescence Imaging of Cancer Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010;20:1733–1741. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hwang DW, Ko HY, Lee JH, Kang H, Ryu SH, Song IC, Lee DS, Kim S. A nucleolin-targeted multimodal nanoparticle imaging probe for tracking cancer cells using an aptamer. J. Nucl. Med. 2010;51:98–105. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Liu Y, Mi Y, Zhao J, Feng SS. Multifunctional silica nanoparticles for targeted delivery of hydrophobic imaging and therapeutic agents. Int J Pharm. 2011;421:370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Herr JK, Smith JE, Medley CD, Shangguan D, Tan W. Aptamer-Conjugated Nanoparticles for Selective Collection and Detection of Cancer Cells. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:2918–2924. doi: 10.1021/ac052015r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Smith JE, Medley CD, Tang Z, Shangguan D, Lofton C, Tan W. Aptamer-Conjugated Nanoparticles for the Collection and Detection of Multiple Cancer Cells. Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2007;79:3075–3082. doi: 10.1021/ac062151b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yu M, Jambhrunkar S, Thorn P, Chen J, Gu W, Yu C. Hyaluronic acid modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery to CD44-overexpressing cancer cells. Nanoscale. 2012 doi: 10.1039/c2nr32145a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.He Q, Ma M, Wei C, Shi J. Mesoporous carbon@silicon-silica nanotheranostics for synchronous delivery of insoluble drugs and luminescence imaging. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4392–4402. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Idris NM, Gnanasammandhan MK, Zhang J, Ho PC, Mahendran R, Zhang Y. In vivo photodynamic therapy using upconversion nanoparticles as remote-controlled nanotransducers. Nat Med. 2012;18:1580–1585. doi: 10.1038/nm.2933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wang F, Chen X, Zhao Z, Tang S, Huang X, Lin C, Cai C, Zheng N. Synthesis of magnetic, fluorescent and mesoporous core-shell-structured nanoparticles for imaging, targeting and photodynamic therapy. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011;21:11244–11252. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Chen D-Y, Jiang M-J, Li N-J, Gu H-W, Xu Q-F, Ge J-F, Xia X-W, Lu J-M. Modification of magnetic silica/iron oxide nanocomposites with fluorescent polymethacrylic acid for cancer targeting and drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:6422–6429. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cheng S-H, Lee C-H, Chen M-C, Souris JS, Tseng F-G, Yang C-S, Mou C-Y, Chen C-T, Lo L-W. Tri-functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for comprehensive cancer theranostics-the trio of imaging, targeting and therapy. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:6149–6157. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Burns AA, Vider J, Ow H, Herz E, Penate-Medina O, Baumgart M, Larson SM, Wiesner U, Bradbury M. Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles with Efficient Urinary Excretion for Nanomedicine. Nano Letters. 2008;9:442–448. doi: 10.1021/nl803405h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Benezra M, Penate-Medina O, Zanzonico PB, Schaer D, Ow H, Burns A, DeStanchina E, Longo V, Herz E, Iyer S, Wolchok J, Larson SM, Wiesner U, Bradbury MS. Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:2768–2780. doi: 10.1172/JCI45600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tivnan A, Orr WS, Gubala V, Nooney R, Williams DE, McDonagh C, Prenter S, Harvey H, Domingo-Fernandez R, Bray IM, Piskareva O, Ng CY, Lode HN, Davidoff AM, Stallings RL. Inhibition of neuroblastoma tumor growth by targeted delivery of microRNA-34a using anti-disialoganglioside GD2 coated nanoparticles. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Benachour H, Seve A, Bastogne T, Frochot C, Vanderesse R, Jasniewski J, Miladi I, Billotey C, Tillement O, Lux F, Barberi-Heyob M. Multifunctional Peptide-conjugated hybrid silica nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy and MRI. Theranostics. 2012;2:889–904. doi: 10.7150/thno.4754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Yang H, Zhuang Y, Sun Y, Dai A, Shi X, Wu D, Li F, Hu H, Yang S. Targeted dual-contrast T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of tumors using multifunctional gadolinium-labeled superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4584–4593. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Gary-Bobo M, Mir Y, Rouxel C, Brevet D, Hocine O, Maynadier M, Gallud A, Da Silva A, Mongin O, Blanchard-Desce M, Richeter S, Loock B, Maillard P, Morère A, Garcia M, Raehm L, Durand J-O. Multifunctionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the in vitro treatment of retinoblastoma: Drug delivery, one and two-photon photodynamic therapy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012;432:99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






