Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1977 May;74(5):2031–2035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2031

Do myoblasts in vivo withdraw from the cell cycle? A reexamination.

P A Buckley, I R Konigsberg
PMCID: PMC431067  PMID: 266722

Abstract

The proliferative fraction of mononucleated cells in differentiating chick embryonic wing muscle (day 11) was measured following continuous infusion of tritiated thymidine into the embryonic circulation. During progressively longer intervals of infusion of the isotopically labeled precursor, the percentage of cells that enter S becomes larger, reaching 92% at the longest time period measured (21 hr). These observations suggest that until they are withdrawn into nonreplicative muscle syncytia, virtually all of the single cells in differentiating embryonic muscle remain in the proliferative pool. Earlier calculations of the size of this pool in developing muscle, based on the percentage of cells in S during a brief pulse, indicated, however, that less than half of the mononucleated cells are still replicating. We therefore compared the size of the proliferative fraction determined by continuous labeling with the calculation of this same parameter using our own pulse-labeling data. We find that the calculation underestimates the size of the proliferative pool and is, in fact, an estimate of only that portion of the cells whose generation times cluster around the average. This underestimate is particularly pronounced in differentiating muscle in which, concomitant with myogenic fusion, the distribution of G1 times (and consequently generation times as well) becomes longer and more highly variable. Our results suggest that the mode of administering the labeled DNA precursor profoundly affects the measurement of cell cycle parameters in vivo when these parameters exhibit considerable variability. The data presented here do not support the notion that any sizeable fraction of the myoblast population is withdrawn from the cell cycle for any significant period of time prior to fusion.

Full text

PDF
2031

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bischoff R., Holtzer H. Mitosis and the processes of differentiation of myogenic cells in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1969 Apr;41(1):188–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckley P. A., Konigsberg I. R. Myogenic fusion and the duration of the post-mitotic gap (G1). Dev Biol. 1974 Mar;37(1):193–212. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(74)90179-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holtzer H., Rubinstein N., Fellini S., Yeoh G., Chi J., Birnbaum J., Okayama M. Lineages, quantal cell cycles, and the generation of cell diversity. Q Rev Biophys. 1975 Nov;8(4):523–557. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500001980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KONIGSBERG I. R. Thyroid regulation of protein and nucleic acid accumulation in developing skeletal muscle of the chick embryo. J Cell Physiol. 1958 Aug;52(1):13–41. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030520103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marchok A. C., Herrmann H. Studies of muscle development. I. Changes in cell proliferation. Dev Biol. 1967 Feb;15(2):129–155. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. O'Neill M. C., Stockdale F. E. Differentiation without cell division in cultured skeletal muscle. Dev Biol. 1972 Dec;29(4):410–418. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90081-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. QUASTLER H., SHERMAN F. G. Cell population kinetics in the intestinal epithelium of the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jun;17(3):420–438. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SINGER M. Apparatus for continuous infusion of microvolumes of solution into organs and tissue. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):378–380. doi: 10.3181/00379727-86-21105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES