Skip to main content
Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology logoLink to Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
. 2015 Jan 8;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13223-014-0065-6

Allergy to sunflower seed and sunflower butter as proposed vehicle for sensitization

Elana Lavine 1,, Moshe Ben-Shoshan 2
PMCID: PMC4311509  PMID: 25642250

Abstract

Background

It is hypothesized that household exposure to allergenic proteins via an impaired skin barrier, such as atopic dermatitis, may contribute to the development of IgE sensitization. Household presence of peanut is a risk factor for the development of peanut allergy in children. Sunflower seed butter is a peanut-free alternative to peanut butter, and sunflower seed allergy is an uncommon but reported entity.

Case presentation

A 3 year old boy presented with oral discomfort that developed almost immediately after he ate sunflower seeds for the first time. He was given a dose of diphenhydramine. Subsequently he vomited, and his symptoms gradually resolved. A similar episode occurred to a commercial snack made with sunflower seed butter. Skin prick testing demonstrated a large positive (10 mm wheal) wheal-and-flare response to a slurry of fresh sunflower seed within 3–4 minutes associated with severe pruritus.

This child has an older sibling with confirmed peanut allergy (PNA). After the PNA diagnosis was made, the family home became peanut-free. In lieu of peanut butter, sunflower butter was purchased and eaten frequently by family members, but not by the child reported herein.

Subsequent to the episodes above, the child ate a bread roll with visible poppy seeds and developed itchy throat, dyspnea, and urticaria. Epicutaneous skin testing elicited a >10 mm wheal size within 3–4 minutes in response to a slurry of whole poppy seeds and 8 mm to fresh pumpkin seed, which had never been consumed.

Conclusions

A case of sunflower allergy in the context of household consumption of sunflower butter has not yet been reported. We suggest that homes which are intentionally peanut-safe may provide an environment whereby infants with impaired skin barrier are at increased risk of allergy to alternative “butter” products being used, via cutaneous exposure to these products preceding oral introduction to the child.

Keywords: Sunflower seed, Allergy, Risk factors

Background

Given that studies report relatively rapid increase in worldwide prevalence of food allergy in the last decade [1], research has aimed to identify modifiable environmental factors that might contribute to this increase. However, the factors involved have not yet been established. While early ingestion of allergenic foods may promote the development of tolerance [2], one prominent hypothesis suggests that household exposure to allergenic proteins via an impaired skin barrier may contribute to the development of IgE sensitization to those food proteins. Both household presence of peanut [3] and development of atopic dermatitis in infancy [4] are risk factors for development of peanut allergy in children.

Seeds are now recognized as a significant food allergen with potential for anaphylaxis. Sesame and mustard are both priority food allergens on Health Canada’s list; they must be identified on product labels [5]. Although they are the most common seed allergies reported, reactions to other seeds can also be immediate and severe [6,7]. We report a case of sun flower seed allergy in the context of impaired skin barrier and frequent home exposure to sunflower seeds in the form of sunflower “butter”, one available substitute for peanut butter.

Case presentation

A 3 year old boy presented with oral discomfort that developed almost immediately after he ate sunflower seeds for the first time. He was given a dose of diphenhydramine. Subsequently he vomited, and his symptoms gradually resolved.

Some weeks later he was given a snack bar made with sunflower seed “butter”, and after a small bite, vomited, complained of discomfort of his mouth and tongue, and seemed sleepier than usual. Parents monitored him at home and no medication was given. They sought an allergy consultation to assess for possibility of sunflower seed allergy.

This child has an older sibling with confirmed peanut allergy (PNA). After the PNA diagnosis was made, the family home became peanut-free. In lieu of peanut butter, sunflower butter was purchased and eaten frequently by family members, but not by the child reported herein. However, he had been consuming sunflower oil for several years without incident. He had also eaten whole sesame seeds and flaxseed. He had a history of mild infantile atopic dermatitis, which had improved over time.

Subsequent to the episodes above, the child ate a bread roll with visible poppy seeds and developed itchy throat and dyspnea. Parents administered an epinephrine auto-injector and brought him to the emergency department, where he developed facial urticaria. He was monitored and discharged home after an uneventful period of observation.

Epicutaneous skin (prick) testing demonstrated a large positive (10 mm wheal) wheal-and-flare response to a slurry of fresh sunflower seed within 3–4 minutes associated with severe pruritus. A diagnosis was made of sunflower seed allergy and recommendations given for strict avoidance and availability of an epinephrine auto-injector at all times. A similar reaction (>10 mm wheal size within 3–4 minutes) was observed in response to epicutaneous testing with a slurry of whole poppy seeds. A smaller reaction (8 mm wheal size) was observed to fresh pumpkin seed, which had never been consumed. Parents were counseled with regards to avoidance of all seeds, and declined skin testing with mustard seed.

Discussion

Allergenic properties of seeds

Sunflower and other seeds are small embryonic plants encased in seed coats. Common seeds include sesame, poppy, sunflower, mustard, flaxseed and canola (rapeseed). The 2S albumin storage proteins are major allergens found in the seeds of a wide range of mono and di-cotyledonous plants. They function as storage proteins, providing nutrients during germination and to the growing plant. 2S albumins, named as such for their sedimentation coefficient, are found in peanuts, certain tree nuts, and many seeds including that of sunflower (Heliantus annuus) [8].

While they demonstrate a high level of polymorphism, typical characteristics of 2S albumin storage proteins include compact structure, disulfide bonds which confer stability under conditions of heating or pH extremes, and glycosylation, conferring additional stability. These qualities allow for resistance to harsh conditions such as acidic pH and proteolytic digestive enzymes, allowing these allergens to reach the gastrointestinal immune system with intact allergenic epitopes that can elicit IgE responses [8].

Sunflower seed, its products, and allergy

Although uncommon, sunflower seed allergy has been reported as a cause of IgE-mediated food allergic reaction and anaphylaxis [9-12]. One suspected risk factor for this allergy has been the ownership of household pet birds, ie the handling of birdseed containing sunflower seeds [9].

Although sunflower oil rarely may cause allergic reactions, it is more commonly tolerated due to extremely low protein content after processing [13].

Sunflower “butter” is a product made with roasted sunflower seeds and additional ingredients such as sugars, salts and oils. Large-scale production began after joint efforts between the Agricultural Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture and a private sunflower seed processor at the beginning of the 21st century, with efforts focused on making the spread palatable [14]. The product, known as SunButter, was unveiled in 2002, but became more widely carried by large retailers in 2011 [15].

The first report of allergic reaction to sunflower seed butter described a confirmed IgE mediated reaction to similar product in Australia [16]. The 5 year old child in this report had egg and peanut allergies, asthma, atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis and was introduced to sunflower butter as an alternative protein source. It was speculated that lesser exposures to sunflower seed, via muesli or granola bars, may have provided the route of sensitization.

Mechanism of sensitization to food allergens

It is postulated that food processing and introduction of food allergens through an impaired skin barrier play an important role in the development of food allergies. Research has suggested that roasting of peanut and emulsification into a “butter” vehicle may play a role in the documented increase in peanut allergy [17,18]. It has also been suggested that exposure to topical creams containing peanut proteins through an impaired skin barrier may result in IgE mediated peanut allergy, while early oral exposure is able to promote tolerance [17]. The dry-roasting of peanut - a common practice in Western cultures but not Eastern ones - has been demonstrated to augment peanut’s immunogenicity, with cutaneous sensitization provoking further hypersensitivity in the gut on subsequent oral antigen exposure in a mouse model [19]. Consistent with these theories, household peanut consumption is correlated with risk of peanut allergy in children [20].

Conclusions

A case of sunflower allergy in the context of household consumption of sunflower butter has not yet been reported. We suggest that consumption of sunflower seed and possibly other “butters”, as peanut alternatives, may lead to sensitization with less common allergens in those with impaired skin barrier, if cutaneous exposure precedes oral introduction and development of tolerance. Homes that are intentionally peanut-safe may provide the environment whereby infants with impaired skin barrier are at increased risk when alternative “butter” products are being used. By virtue of roasting and emulsification, the allergenicity of sunflower seeds may be optimized in the creation of a “butter” product, but further research is required in this regard.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parent for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

EL: 1) identification of subject for case report 2) drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content and; 3) final approval of the version to be published. MBS: 1) identification of subject for case report 2) drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content and; 3) final approval of the version to be published.

Contributor Information

Elana Lavine, Email: e.lavine@utoronto.ca.

Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Email: moshebenshoshan@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Ben-Shoshan M, Turnbull E, Clarke A. Food allergy: temporal trends and determinants. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012;12(4):346–372. doi: 10.1007/s11882-012-0274-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(2):291–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fox AT, Sasieni P, du Toit G, Syed H, Lack G. Household peanut consumption as a risk factor for the development of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(2):417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown SJ, Asai Y, Cordell HJ, Campbell LE, Zhao Y, Liao H, Northstone K, Henderson J, Alizadehfar R, Ben-Shoshan M, Morgan K, Roberts G, Masthoff LJ, Pasmans SG, van den Akker PC, Wijmenga C, Hourihane JO, Palmer CN, Lack G, Clarke A, Hull PR, Irvine AD, McLean WH. Loss-of-function variants in the filaggrin gene are a significant risk factor for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):661–667. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Government of Canada [http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/securit/allerg/fa-aa/index-eng.php]
  • 6.Frantzen B, Broecker E-B, Trautmann A. Immediate-type allergy caused by poppy seed. Allergy. 2000;55(1):97–98. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00456.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alvarez-Perea A, Alzate-Pérez D, Doleo Maldonado A, Baeza ML. Anaphylaxis caused by flaxseed. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2013;23(6):446–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morena FJ, Clemente A. Albumin storage proteins: what makes them food allergens? Open Biochem J. 2008;2:16–28. doi: 10.2174/1874091X00802010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yagami A. Anaphylaxis to lipid transfer protein from sunflower seeds. Allergy. 2010;65:1340–1341. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Axelsson IG, Ihre E, Zetterstrom O. Anaphylactic reactions to sunflower seed. Allergy. 1994;49:517–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb01122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noyes JH, Boyd GK, Settipane GA. Anaphylaxis to sunflower seed. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1979;63:242–244. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(79)90107-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Palma-Carlos AG, Palma-Carlos ML, Tengarrinha F. Allergy to sunflower seeds. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;37:183–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zitouni N, Errahali Y, Metche M, Kanny G, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Nicolas JP, Fremont S. Influence of refining steps on trace allergenic protein content in sunflower oil. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:962–967. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.110229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.United States Department of Agriculture [http://www.ars.usda.gov/IS/pr/2005/050517.htm]
  • 15.United States Department of Agriculture [http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/br/sunbutter]
  • 16.Hsu DC, Katelaris CH. Is “nut-free” sunflower seed butter safe for children with peanut allergy? Med J Aust. 2007;187(9):542–543. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Petersen A, Rennert S, Kull S, Becker WM, Notbohm H, Goldmann T, Jappe U. Roasting and lipid binding provide allergenic and proteolytic stability to the peanut allergen Ara h 8. Biol Chem. 2014;395(2):239–250. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beyer K, Morrow E, Li XM, Bardina L, Bannon GA, Burks AW, Sampson HA. Effects of cooking methods on peanut allergenicity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107:1077–1081. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.115480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moghaddam AE Hillson WR, Noti M, Gartlan KH, Johnson S, Thomas B, Artis D, Sattentau QJ. Dry roasting enhances peanut-induced allergic sensitization across mucosal and cutaneous routes in mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; epub Sept 21, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Lack G, Fox D, Northstone K, Golding J, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Study Team Factors associated with the development of peanut allergy in childhood. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(11):977–985. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES