Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2014 Oct 5;69:214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.019

Effectiveness of a 12-month randomized clinical trial to increase physical activity in multiethnic postpartum women: Results from Hawaii’s Nā Mikimiki Project

Cheryl L Albright 1,2,3, Alana D Steffen 1,4, Lynne R Wilkens 5, Kami K White 5, Rachel Novotny 6, Claudio R Nigg 3, Kara Saiki 1,2, Wendy J Brown 7
PMCID: PMC4312232  NIHMSID: NIHMS655524  PMID: 25285751

Abstract

Objective

Few postpartum ethnic minority women perform leisure-time moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The study tested the effectiveness of a 12-month tailored intervention to increase MVPA in women with infants 2–12 months old.

Methods

From 2008–2011, women (n=311) with infants (average age = 5.7 months) from Honolulu, Hawaii were randomly assigned to receive tailored telephone calls and access to a mom-centric website (n=154) or access to a standard PA website (n=157). MVPA was measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months using self-report and acclerometers.

Results

Controlling for covariates, the tailored condition significantly increased self-reported MVPA from an average of 44 to 246 minutes/week compared with 46 to 156 minutes/week for the standard condition (p=0.027). Mothers with ≥ 2 children had significantly greater increases in MVPA in response to the tailored intervention than those with one child (p=0.016). Accelerometer-measured MVPA significantly increased over time (p=0.0001), with no condition differences. There was evidence of reactivity to initially wearing accelerometers; the tailored intervention significantly increased MVPA among women with low baseline accelerometer MVPA minutes, but not among those with high minutes (pinteraction=0.053).

Conclusion

A tailored intervention effectively increased MVPA over 12 months in multiethnic women with infants, particularly those with more than one child.

Keywords: exercise, postnatal, randomized controlled trial, technology

1. Introduction

Previous studies have shown that women with children are less active than their same aged female peers without children(Albright, Maddock, & Nigg, 2005; Allender, Hutchinson, & Foster, 2008; Bellows-Riecken & Rhodes, 2008; W. J. Brown, Heesch, & Miller, 2009; W. J. Brown & Trost, 2003; Engberg et al., 2012), and that there are significant changes in health behaviors, including reductions in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), during the postpartum period.(Borodulin, Evenson, & Herring, 2009; Durham et al., 2011; Evenson, Herring, & Wen, 2012; Haas et al., 2005; Olson, Strawderman, Hinton, & Pearson, 2003) These changes place this vulnerable population at risk for weight gain and development of chronic health conditions such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes.(W. J. Brown & Trost, 2003; Gould Rothberg, Magriples, Kershaw, Rising, & Ickovics, 2011; Metzger, 2007; Olson et al., 2003; Retnakaran et al., 2010; Walker, Fowles, & Sterling, 2011)

Recent studies have tested the effectiveness of leisure-time physical activity (PA) interventions, alone or in combination with dietary change/weight loss in postpartum women.(Chang, Nitzke, & Brown, 2010; Cramp & Brawley, 2006; Da Costa et al., 2009; Davenport, Giroux, Sopper, & Mottola, 2011; Fahrenwald, Atwood, Walker, Johnson, & Berg, 2004; Fjeldsoe, Miller, & Marshall, 2010; H. D. McIntyre, Peacock, Miller, Koh, & Marshall, 2012; Taveras et al., 2011) However, few PA interventions have intervened only on PA,(Fahrenwald et al., 2004; Fjeldsoe et al., 2010; Miller, Trost, & Brown, 2002) with just three studies focusing primarily on ethnic minority postpartum women, most of whom were African-Americans or Hispanics.(Chang et al., 2010; Clarke et al., 2007; Ostbye et al., 2009) Several studies were short-term (< 6 months) leaving longer term (12-month) interventions untested. (Fahrenwald et al., 2004; Fjeldsoe et al., 2010; Miller et al., 2002; J. F. Norman, Pozehl, Duncan, Hertzog, & Krueger, 2012) Therefore, little is known about the effectiveness of PA interventions with ethnic minorities including Asian-Americans, Native Hawaiians, and other Pacific Islanders (AA and NHOPI). This is important because the number of AA and N HOPI living in Hawaii is 981,129 (72.1% of the population) and, across the U.S., is over 16 million.(United States Census Bureau, 2010, 2011) This is estimated to increase to 47 million by 2060.(United States Census Bureau, 2012a, 2012b)

Since new mothers are high-end users of technology(Hogue & Benezra, 2009), PA interventions are needed that can effectively combine technology and tailored counseling to promote the initiation of MVPA during a time when substantial developmental changes occur in an infant. Telephone and internet interventions have effectively increased PA in a range of populations.(Cavallo et al., 2012; Eakin, Lawler, Vandelanotte, & Owen, 2007; Fanning, Mullen, & McAuley, 2012; Fjeldsoe et al., 2010; Fjeldsoe, Miller, O'Brien, & Marshall, 2012; Marshall, Miller, Graves, Barnett, & Fjeldsoe, 2013) Building on previous research, a PA intervention tailored to meet the needs of multiethnic mothers of infants less than 12 months of age was designed.(Albright, Maddock, et al., 2005; Albright, Maddock, & Nigg, 2009; Chang et al., 2010; Fahrenwald et al., 2004; Fjeldsoe et al., 2010; Miller et al., 2002; Ostbye et al., 2009)

This study compared the effectiveness of two, 12-month technology-based PA interventions designed to increase MVPA in postpartum women. One was a theoretically-derived multi-component PA intervention using constructs previously proven to be effective in PA interventions.(Albright, Pruitt, et al., 2005; Chen, Sallis, Castro, Hickman, & Lee, 1998; Collins, Lee, Albright, & King, 2004; Marcus, Ciccolo, & Sciamanna, 2009; Marcus et al., 2000; Marshall et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2002) The other intervention used a ‘standard’ PA website as a comparison. We hypothesized that the tailored intervention would significantly increase MVPA more than the standard intervention, as measured by surveys and accelerometers.

2. Methods

Study Design

The Nā Mikimiki (Hawaiian for “the active ones”) Project was a 12-month parallel randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of a tailored telephone counseling plus website (TTCW) PA intervention to a standard website-only (SWO) PA intervention.(Albright et al., 2012) Using pilot data,(Albright et al., 2009) a sample size of 100 per condition by study end was needed to detect a medium effect size of Cohen’s d=0.4 (reflecting a difference of 30 minutes/week), with α=0.05 and 80% power. More details on the study are reported elsewhere; briefly, the study recruited healthy women who were not regularly active (i.e., < 30 minutes MVPA/wk), were 18–45 years of age, had BMIs from 18.5 to 40 kg/m2 and had an infant between 2–12 months of age.(Albright et al., 2012)

Recruitment

From 2008 through 2010, 311 postpartum women were recruited using: (1) community-wide promotions and (2) a health care organization (Kaiser Permanente, KP). Recruitment strategies are summarized in a CONSORT flow diagram (Figure 1). All study protocols and assessments were approved by the University of Hawaii’s Human Studies Program and the KP Institutional Review Board. Participants signed an informed consent prior to enrollment. A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) monitored severe adverse events and other study outcomes over the course of the study.

Figure 1. Accrual and Retention of Participants – CONSORT* Flow Diagram: Honolulu, Hi: 2008–2011.

Figure 1

*Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; see: http://www.consort-statement.org/home/

aParenting magazines (readership): Island Family/Island Baby (45,000), Hawaii Parent (45,000), Hawaii Baby & Toddler (20,000).

bNewspapers (readership): The University of Hawaii student newspaper (10,000), Honolulu Weekly (38,000), Star Bulletin (63,000), Star Bulletin: Progress (177,000), Midweek (268,000), Hawaii People (189,000), and Honolulu Advertiser (158,155).

cKaiser Permanente staff sent a maximum of 3 postcards to mothers who met the basic eligibility criteria as determined by electronic medical records. For each recruitment attempt, eligible mothers were mailed a returnable postcard, followed by a phone call to non-responders.

dDid not meet inclusion criteria because they were already exercising (n = 66), pregnant/planning to become pregnant (n = 13), using insulin (n = 1), planning to leave Oahu (n = 7), unwilling to complete assessments or office visits (n = 4), or BMI<18.5 (n = 8) or BMI>40 (n = 9), no health insurance (n = 8), cancer (n = 5), heart disease/attack (n = 1), stroke (n = 1), infant < 2 mo (n = 1), infant > 12 mo (n = 7), twins (n = 2), did not have GDM in last pregnancy (n = 3).

eActive Decline = Declined to be scheduled for a baseline visit; Passive Decline = Failed to attend scheduled baseline visit or failed to attend baseline visit after being rescheduled 3 times

f Received at least 1 telephone call

g Discontinued participation – reason unknown.

Randomization

Randomization was implemented within four strata defined by recruitment source and parity, and within blocks of size 4, 6, or 8, which were used to ensure balance in assignment over the course of the study. (Friedman, Furberg, & Demets, 1998) Assessment staff were blinded to the participant’s assigned condition and intervention staff were blinded to primary outcomes.

Study Conditions

Participants in the SWO condition were referred to a condition-specific website that included links to “standard” (i.e., for males/females of any age) PA credible websites and resources on how to increase PA.(Albright et al., 2012) Of the 157 women in this condition, 20% did not visit the website, 17% visited once, 55% visited 2–10 times, and 8% visited ≥ 11 times, for a total of 533 page views over the 12 months.

The TTCW condition addressed key psychosocial factors including: self-efficacy to overcome barriers to leisure-time MVPA(Fahrenwald & Walker, 2003; Hinton & Olson, 2001a, 2001b; Lombard, Deeks, Ball, Jolley, & Teede, 2009), enlisting support for PA (C. A. McIntyre & Rhodes, 2009; Miller et al., 2002), and navigating environmental factors (e.g., finding “stroller friendly” parks). Participants in this condition were referred to a condition-specific tailored website, and received 17 telephone calls with a counselor who used motivational interviewing techniques to problem-solve barriers and set future PA goals (incrementally building up to 150 minutes/week of MVPA). They were issued a pedometer (New Lifestyles NL-1000)(Gilson et al., 2013; Samuels, Raedeke, Mahar, Karvinen, & DuBose, 2011) to track and set goals using steps (with goal of 10,000 steps a day). Tailored mom-centric PA “resource directories” and newsletters were key components of the website. Both the written information (website/newsletters) and the telephone counseling calls were developed/delivered using Resnicow’s framework for creating culturally sensitive interventions which revolves around two dimensions: surface structure and deep structure.(Resnicow, Baranowski, Ahluwalia, & Braithwaite, 1999) The intervention’s use of surface structure included external representations of AA and NHOPI in Hawaii (e.g., artwork/photos depicting Asian/NHOPI women and infants), and for deep structure the ethnically matched counselors were knowledgeable and respectful of the Native Hawaiian’s cultural values of family (or ‘ohana) and Japanese cultural values of social harmony and interdependence within the family.(Ka'opua, Park, Ward, & Braun, 2011; Mau et al., 2001; Maxwell et al., 2014; McLaughlin & Braun, 1998)

A majority (70%) of TTCW women received 13 or more calls, and the average duration of the calls was 12.7 (SD= 6.4) minutes. Of the 154 women in the TTCW condition, 23% did not visit its website, 6% visited once, 31% visited 2–10 times, 18% visited 11–20 times, and 22% visited ≥ 21 times, for a total of 2,092 page views over the 12 months.

Fidelity to the Intervention Protocol

Five percent of the 1,586 recorded telephone counseling calls were randomly selected for assessment of fidelity. Fidelity to the key intervention components (e.g., goal setting, barrier resolution, resources) was 88%.(Albright et al., 2012) Setting the woman’s next MVPA goal was discussed in 100% of the evaluated calls.

Study Measurement Procedures

A detailed description of the study measures is available elsewhere (Albright et al., 2012); briefly, self-administered surveys were completed at baseline, and 1, 6, and 12 months post-baseline, with accelerometer data collected at baseline 3, 6, and 12 months. Participants in both conditions were given a total of $60 in gift cards for participation.

Physical Activity Survey

The Active Australia Survey instrument (AAS(W. J. Brown, Burton, Marshall, & Miller, 2008)) assessed frequency and duration of the following activities performed for at least 10 minutes in the last week: walking (“for recreation, exercise, or to get from place to place”), moderate intensity PA (e.g., leisure swimming) and vigorous PA (e.g., jogging). The AAS has been shown to have good test-retest reliability,(W. J. Brown, Trost, Bauman, Mummery, & Owen, 2004) validity via objective accelerometer-measured PA,(W. J. Brown et al., 2008; Fjeldsoe, Winkler, Marshall, Eakin, & Reeves, 2013) and to be sensitive to change.(Reeves, Marshall, Owen, Winkler, & Eakin, 2010) A MVPA summary score was created as the sum of minutes of walking and moderate-to-vigorous PA, with vigorous activity time weighted by two.(Albright et al., 2012; W. J. Brown & Bauman, 2000)

Psychosocial Measures

Detailed descriptions, including psychometric properties, of all the psychosocial measures are available elsewhere.(Albright et al., 2012) Validated instruments included self-efficacy to overcome barriers to PA (e.g., sick infant) (Albright, Maddock, et al., 2005; Albright et al., 2009; Albright et al., 2012; Garcia & King, 1991; Miller et al., 2002), perceived barriers and benefits of regular PA(Albright et al., 2012; Heesch, Masse, & Dunn, 2006; J. F. Sallis, Calfas, Alcaraz, Gehrman, & Johnson, 1999), and social support for exercise.(J.F. Sallis, Grossman, Pinski, Patterson, & Nader, 1987) Finally, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale assessed depressive symptoms.(Cox, Holden, & Sagovsky, 1987) After the 12-month active intervention period participants in both conditions completed anonymous evaluations of how satisfied they were with their intervention and how helpful specific intervention components were to their efforts to increase MVPA.

Accelerometer Data for MVPA

A sealed Lifecorder EX downloadable accelerometer (New Lifestyles NL-2200, Inc, MO) was used to collect objective MVPA minutes at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Participants wore the device for 7 days (during waking hours) at each time point. The Lifecorder EX device recorded time spent at proprietary intensity levels (microactivity and levels 1–9) in 4 second and 2 minute epochs. Lifecorder’s level 4 was previously estimated to have a MET equivalence of 2.9(Kumahara et al., 2004), and was selected as our cutoff for MVPA that is generally defined as MET≥3.0.(Ainsworth et al., 2000) Thus, MVPA was computed as time spent at Lifecorder levels 4–9, averaged across valid days. Valid days were defined as 10 hours per day of wear, excluding bouts of zero activity that were 20 minutes or longer, which were considered periods when the device was not worn. The minimum number of valid days for inclusion in the analysis was three or more, where at least one was a weekend day.

Statistical Analysis

The primary analyses (conducted 2011- 2013) compared change in minutes of MVPA from baseline to 12 months in the two conditions using an intention to treat strategy. Outcome measures were transformed based on the Box-Cox method to better meet model assumptions.(Snedecor & Cochran, 1989) Self-reported MVPA weighted for intensity was transformed as (y+1) to the 0.25 power. The accelerometer MVPAdata were not transformed. Mixed linear growth models,(Singer & Willett, 2003) were used to estimate and compare differences in MVPA over time between conditions. These models, also called random coefficient models, include random linear trends (intercept and slope terms) for each individual and fixed terms for intercept and slope for each condition (via main effect and interaction terms) estimating the overall expected value, as well as fixed effects for covariates. The treatment effect was assessed by the F test of the fixed interaction parameter for time and intervention group. Models were run with and without adjustment for covariates selected a priori. Adjustment variables included: age, race, BMI, number of children, education level, full-time employment, Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, baby's age, history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), source of recruitment, and number of years lived in Hawaii. The effect size was calculated by taking the differences between the means at month 12 predicted from the adjusted model, divided by the standard deviation for the difference computed from the within and between subject variance components. Additionally, moderation was tested in the mixed growth model by the F-test for three-way interaction terms between time, study condition, and potential moderators (including the adjustment variables and baseline PA level); the model included all two-way interaction terms.

About one-quarter of women who were randomized did not provide information by survey on MVPA at 12 months, and this differed by condition (18% for SWO and 32% for TTCW). Thirty-seven percent of women did not provide accelerometer data at 12 months, which was not different by condition. Model results are presented using all available data (includes women with at least one MVPA measurement and all covariates at baseline) However, analyses were conducted to address attrition and missing outcome data. Correlates of attrition, identified using a stepwise logistic model, were the TTCW treatment condition, younger age and higher BMI for the survey data, and younger age, higher BMI, Hawaiian race and lower education for the accelerometry data. The impact of missing MVPA data on the validity of study results was assessed for the survey data, but not for the accelerometer data due to the greater extent and non-differential nature of the missing data. First, a pattern mixture model(Hedeker & Gibbons, 1997) was used to compare the treatment effect between those who completed assessments and those who did not. Multiple imputation (MI)(Little & Rubin, 2002; Muthén & Muthén, 1998–2010) was then performed separately by experimental condition, accounting for all adjustment variables and variables related to attrition. Results were aggregated using standard MI techniques across 10 data sets.

Analyses were primarily conducted using SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary NC), and Mplus, version 6.(Muthén & Muthén, 1998–2010) P-values were two-sided, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant and 0.05 ≤ p< 0.10 suggestive for interaction effects.

3. Results

Of the 311 participants randomized into the study, 154 were randomized to TTCW and 157 to SWO (see Figure 1 for recruitment sources). Table 1 lists the number of women who provided surveys or accelerometer data at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-baseline. Approximately 75% (233) of the 311 participants completed the 12 month intervention and survey. This differed by treatment group (TTCW: 68%; SWO: 82%, p< 0.05 by chi-square test). Twelve month accelerometer data were available for 63% of women, with no condition differences (60% for TTCW and 66% for SWO, p=0.28). The number of valid days an accelerometer was worn at each timepoint (Table 1) was also not significantly different by condition (p=0.53).

Table 1.

Completion of Surveys and Accelerometers over time by study condition. Honolulu, Hawaii: 2008–2011

Tailored Telephone Counseling plus Website
(n=154)
Standard Website Only
(n=157)
Survey
Accelerometer
Survey
Accelerometer
Retained Completed Returned Valida Retained Completed Returned Valid
Baseline N 154 154 142 120 157 157 152 122
% of Retained 100 92.2 77.9 100 96.8 77.7
% of Randomized 100 92.2 77.9 100 96.8 77.7
Month 1b N 149 132 - - 155 139 - -
% of Retained 88.6 89.7
% of Randomized 85.7 88.5
Month 3c N 147 - 126 70 155 - 139 81
% of Retained 85.7 47.6 89.7 52.3
% of Randomized 81.8 45.5 88.5 51.6
Month 6 N 125 110 101 52 147 133 127 70
% of Retained 88.0 80.8 41.6 90.5 86.4 47.6
% of Randomized 71.4 65.6 33.8 84.7 80.9 44.6
Month 12 N 113 104 93 50 136 129 104 66
% of Retained 92.0 82.3 44.2 94.9 76.5 48.5
% of Randomized 67.5 60.4 32.5 82.2 66.2 42.0
a

Defined as having three or more days with at least 10 hours per day of wear, excluding bouts of zero activity that were 20 minutes or longer, which were considered periods when the device was not worn, with at least one weekend day.

b

Accelerometer not distributed to participants

c

Survey not distributed to participants

Baseline socio-demographic characteristics of women in both conditions are shown in Table 2; there were no significant differences between conditions. In addition, there were no significant baseline differences between TTCW and SWO in: self-reported MVPA (median 40 min/wk for both, p=0.95); accelerometer MVPA minutes (median: 132 and 151 min/wk, respectively, p=0.15), or in the psychosocial variables. A majority of the sample (85%) were ethnic minorities, most of whom were AA or NHOPI.

Table 2.

Baseline socio-demographic characteristics by study condition (N =311) Honolulu, Hawaii: 2008–2011

Tailored Telephone
Counseling plus
Website
(N = 154)
Standard
Website Only
(N = 157)
Characteristic, % (n) pa
Woman’s Mage (SD) 31.6 (5.5) 32.1 (5.9) 0.46

Baby’s Mage in months (SD) 5.3 (2.8) 5.8 (2.9) 0.14

Mean number of children (SD) 2.0 (1.0) 1.9 (0.9) 0.66

Mean BMI, kg/m2 (SD) 28.4 (5.5) 27.4 (5.0) 0.25

BMI categories 0.64
  < 18.5 0.6 (1) 0
  18.5–24.9 30.5 (47) 35.7 (56)
  25–29.9 33.1 (51) 32.5 (51)
  30–34.9 22.7 (35) 22.9 (36)
  ≥ 35 13.0 (20) 8.9 (14)

Raceb 0.39
  Asian 34.6 (53) 33.3 (52)
    Japanese 5.9 (9) 10.9 (17)
    Filipino 15.7 (24) 9.0 (14)
    Mixed/Other Asian 13.1 (20) 13.5 (21)
  Native Hawaiian / other Pacific Islander 32 (49) 31.4 (49)
  White 13.1 (20) 17.3 (27)
  Other Mixed Race 17.6 (27) 15.4 (24)
  Other (Black, Native American) 2.6 (4) 2.6 (4)

Ethnicity
  Hispanicc 15.8 (24) 19.5 (30) 0.45

Number of Children 0.33
  Primiparous 37.7 (58) 35.7 (56)
  Two children 35.1 (54) 42.7 (67)
  Three or more children 27.3 (42) 21.7 (34)

Employment 0.49
  No paid employment/family leave 39.0 (60) 33.1 (52)
  Paid part-time 18.2 (28) 22.3 (35)
  Paid full-time 42.9 (66) 44.6 (70)

Born in U.S. 85.1 (131) 84.7 (133) 1.00

History of Gestational Diabetesd 16.9 (26) 15.3 (24) 0.70

Education Level 0.55
  Less than High School 3.9 (6) 3.2 (5)
  High School graduate 19.0 (29) 17.8 (28)
  Some College 24.8 (38) 17.8 (28)
  Bachelor’s degree 20.9 (32) 23.6 (37)
  Post graduate 31.4 (48) 37.6 (59)

Marital Status 0.31
  Never Married 18.8 (29) 15.9 (25)
  Married/ Living as married 76.6 (118) 82.2 (129)
  Separated/Divorced 4.5 (7) 1.9 (3)

Smoking 0.47
  Never Smokers 73.0 (111) 75.3 (116)
  Former smoker 24.3 (37) 20.1 (31)
  Current smoker (4–20 cigarettes/day) 2.6 (4) 4.6 (7)

Currently Breast Feeding 96.8 (149) 97.5 (153) 0.75

Regular childcare for infant 43.5 (67) 47.1 (74) 0.57

Type of Delivery 0.18
  Vaginal 76.6 (118) 69.4 (109)
  Cesarean 23.4 (36) 29.9 (47)
  Adoption 0 0.6 (1)

Baby is mobile 25.3 (39) 28.7 (45) 0.53
a

Chi square test for differences in proportions; t test for differences in means

b

For 2 women (1 per group) race/ethnicity was missing/not reported

c

Of the women who reported being Hispanic, 81% were represented in the above listed race categories, for example in the Filipino, Native Hawaiian, or mixed race categories

d

Diagnosed with gestational diabetes in most recent pregnancy

Over the 12 month period, 31 women (10%) ended their participation in the trial prior to completion because they were “too busy”, the intervention was “too much”, etc. (Figure 1).(Albright et al., 2012) Twenty –eight women’s participation was ended due to a pregnancy, and three women were removed due to medical problems, judged by the DSMB and the IRB, to be unrelated to PA or the interventions.

Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity Results

For the change in self-reported minutes of MVPA/wk, there was a significant interaction between time and condition (p=0.027), with the TTCW condition showing greater improvement from baseline to 12 months (202 min/week) than in the SWO condition (110 min/week) (see Table 3 and Figure 2). The effect size for the difference at 12 months was 0.36. The findings were not markedly biased by differential attrition. The pattern mixture model found that the treatment effect did not differ among those who completed assessments compared to those who did not (p=0.75). Models using multiple imputation (n=311) and complete cases (n=231, with baseline and 12 month MVPA data and all covariates) yielded similar results. (Table S5).

Table 3.

Minutes of MVPA/week via survey by time point, study condition and participant characteristics. Honolulu, Hawaii: 2008–2011

TTCW SWO
Mean (95% CI)a Minutes MVPA Mean (95% CI)a Minutes MVPA

Baseline Month 12 Baseline Month 12 pb
Overall MVPA via Survey (n=306) 44
(41, 47)
246
(222, 272)
46
(42, 49)
156
(140, 173)
0.027

Median split of minutes of MVPA (40min) via Survey at Baseline 0.13
< Median 9
(8, 11)
185
(153, 221)
9
(8, 11)
159
(130, 194)
≥ Median 127
(119, 135)
318
(272, 368)
128
(119, 137)
153
(126, 184)

Age, years 0.27
  < 25 61
(54, 69)
163
(101, 249)
30
(24, 38)
172
(115, 246)
  25–29 51
(45, 58)
315
(257, 381)
44
(38, 52)
166
(132, 207)
  30–34 38
(32, 44)
211
(168, 262)
53
(46, 60)
137
(111, 167)
  35–39 33
(29, 37)
254
(221, 290)
60
(51, 69)
148
(118, 182)
  ≥ 40 94
(72, 121)
292
(226, 371)
26
(18, 36)
179
(126, 246)

Racec 0.99
  Japanese 36
(27, 46)
182
(119, 266)
42
(33, 52)
105
(76, 141)
  Filipino 35
(29, 41)
153
(108, 211)
37
(28, 48)
89
(59, 129)
  Mixed/Other Asian 66
(56, 78)
223
(171, 285)
64
(53, 76)
181
(139, 231)
  Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander 41
(37, 45)
237
(202, 275)
48
(42, 55)
164
(134, 199)
  White 64
(54, 75)
412
(328, 511)
38
(32, 43)
191
(157, 230)
  Other Mixed Race 38
(33, 43)
248
(210, 291)
47
(40, 56)
148
(114, 189)

BMI, kg/m2 0.93
  < 25 39
(35, 44)
265
(229, 305)
50
(43, 58)
196
(165, 232)
  25–29 52
(46, 58)
227
(189, 270)
45
(39, 50)
133
(110, 160)
  ≥ 30 42
(37, 48)
247
(196, 308)
42
(37, 48)
139
(113, 169)

Education 0.61
  < College graduate 40
(36, 44)
277
(237, 322)
46
(41, 51)
167
(137, 202)
  ≥ College graduate 48
(44, 53)
227
(197, 260)
46
(41, 50)
150 (132, 169)

Employment 0.56
  Not paid 47
(43, 52)
305
(267, 347)
53
(46, 60)
187
(155, 223)
  Paid part-time 36
(29, 44)
231
(168, 310)
56
(49, 64)
134
(105, 168)
  Paid full-time 45
(40, 50)
210
(176, 247)
37
(32, 41)
147
(126, 172)

Number of children 0.016
  1 child 50
(45, 56)
175
(145, 209)
49
(43, 55)
207
(177, 242)
  2 or more 41
(37, 44)
302
(268, 339)
44
(40, 49)
133
(116, 152)

History of gestational diabetes 0.20
  Yes 36
(28, 46)
225
(166, 299)
48
(41, 55)
90
(69, 116)
  No/missing 46
(43, 49)
252
(227, 280)
45
(42, 49)
173
(154, 195)

Baby’s age, months 0.22
  < 3 48
(41, 56)
351
(293, 416)
55
(46, 66)
110
(80, 147)
  3–5 38
(34, 43)
235
(196, 280)
42
(37, 47)
179
(152, 208)
  6–8 48
(41, 55)
178
(141, 222)
47
(37, 58)
171
(135, 213)
  ≥ 9 49
(39, 60)
202
(147, 271)
46
(39, 55)
136
(104, 174)

Source of recruitment 0.93
  Community 42
(38, 46)
234
(202, 270)
49
(44, 54)
159
(138, 182)
  Kaiser Permanente 47
(43, 52)
265
(229, 304)
42
(37, 47)
153
(129, 181)
a

Adjusted for age, race, BMI, education, number of children, employment, depression, baby's age, gestational diabetes, recruitment site, years lived in HI. Means and 95% CIs were computed as (X4-1), where X represented the means and 95% CIs of the predicted values obtained from the models.

b

Treatment effect was assessed by a mixed growth model and the F test of the fixed 2-way interaction parameter for time and study condition for overall and of the 3-way interaction parameter for characteristic level, time, and study condition. The relevant main and interaction parameters (in units of MVPA minutes + 1, to the 0.25 power) for the overall model are as follows: 0.077 (SE=0.011, p<0.0001) for time in months, 0.025 (SE=0.120, p=0.84) for condition and 0.036 (SE=0.016, p=0.027) for the time and condition interaction.

c

Other group excluded in comparison

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Self-reported Minutes of MVPA/week by study condition over time. Honolulu, Hawaii: 2008–2011

The analysis of possible moderators of the change in self-reported MVPA found that number of children was significant (p=0.016, Table 3). Among women with 2 or more children, MVPA increased by 261 min/week in the TTCW condition, and by 89 min/week in the SWO condition. Conversely, among women with only one child, the SWO condition had a similar increase (158 min/wk) to the TTCW condition (125 min/wk). No other moderator was found for self-reported MVPA.

For physicalactivity measured via accelerometry, the sample size was 259 which includes women with valid accelerometry data at any time point. MVPA increased over time in both TTCW and SWO conditions (p’s<0.0001 for the trends). However, there was no significant interaction between condition and time (Table 4). The effect size at 12 months was 0.10. To understand the difference between accelerometer and self-report for change in MVPA by condition, we conducted moderator analyses and found a significant effect of baseline accelerometer PA level. Women in the TTCW condition exhibited a greater increase in MVPA than the SWO condition, among women whose baseline levels were below the median, but not among those above the median (pinteraction=0.053). It is also possible that the intervention effect was influenced by baseline BMI (p=0.09, Table 4). Women with a baseline BMI < 25 kg/m2 in TTCW had a greater increase in MVPA than overweight or obese women in this condition, while this pattern was not found for the SWO condition. No other moderator was found for accelerometer-based MVPA.

Table 4.

Minutes of MVPA/week via accelerometer by time, study condition and participant characteristics Honolulu, Hawaii: 2008–2011

TTCW SWO
Mean (95% CI)a Minutes MVPA Mean (95% CI)a Minutes
MVPA
Baseline Month 12 Baseline Month 12 pb
Overall MVPA at 2.9+ METs
via Accelerometer (n=259)
163
(153, 174)
215
(200, 229)
162
(154, 170)
203
(189, 217)
0.61

Median split of minutes of MVPA at 2.9+ METs (147 min) via Accelerometer at Baseline 0.053
< Median 111
(105, 117)
209
(190, 227)
108
(102, 113)
172
(153, 189)
≥ Median 222
(213, 2231)
218
(195, 242)
212
(207, 217)
248
(232, 264)

Age, years 0.61
  < 30 163
(139, 186)
264
(219, 309)
147
(135, 160)
196
(172, 219)
  30–34 183
(165, 201)
200
(175, 224)
167
(152, 182)
191
(158, 224)
  35–39 143
(130, 157)
212
(188, 235)
182
(166, 199)
235
(211, 258)
  ≥ 40 146
(110, 181)
202
(157, 248)
148
(122, 173)
172
(132, 212)

Racec 0.17
  Japanese 147
(122, 172)
196
(159, 233)
164
(146, 182)
177
(146, 208)
  Filipino 194
(175, 214)
210
(176, 245)
170
(139, 201)
232
(130, 186)
  Mixed/Other Asian 174
(158, 190)
202
(181, 223)
172
(145, 198)
215
(166, 264)
  Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 158
(130, 186)
177
(117, 236)
152
(135, 170)
202
(178, 226)
  White 171
(138, 204)
228
(188, 269)
167
(149, 185)
239
(199, 279)
  Other Mixed Race 144
(124, 164)
270
(215, 325)
155
(136, 174)
171
(134, 208)

BMI, kg/m2 0.091
  < 25 168
(149, 187)
234
(213, 256)
169
(155, 183)
189
(167, 211)
  25–29 156
(142, 170)
207
(183, 232)
155
(140, 171)
232
(206, 258)
  ≥ 30 168
(145, 190)
193
(159, 227)
161
(149, 173)
176
(154, 198)

Education 0.92
  < College graduate 167
(148, 187)
190
(162, 217)
150
(135, 164)
173
(138, 209)
  ≥ College graduate 161
(150, 172)
224
(207, 241)
168
(158, 178)
212
(196, 228)

Employment 0.63
  No paid 130
(116, 144)
208
(180, 236)
153
(139, 167)
171
(147, 195)
  Paid part-time 200
(161. 238)
191
(140, 241)
176
(154, 198)
215
(180, 249)
  Paid full-time 179
(168, 190)
226
(209, 244)
162
(152, 172)
215
(196, 235)

Number of children 0.46
  1 child 160
(145, 176)
217
(194, 240)
165
(151, 179)
221
(194, 249)
  2 or more 165
(151, 179)
214
(195, 233)
160
(150, 170)
195
(179, 212)

History of gestational diabetes 0.72
  Yes 163
(143, 184)
200
(179, 222)
155
(137, 172)
200
(165, 235)
  No/missing 163
(151, 175)
219
(201, 237)
163
(154, 172)
203
(187, 219)

Baby’s age, months 0.45
  < 3 147
(130, 164)
238
(210, 267)
145
(128, 162)
236
(197, 276)
  3–5 180
(160, 200)
221
(199, 244)
169
(156, 182)
199
(173, 224)
  6–8 150
(127, 172)
200
(165, 235)
172
(152, 162)
198
(162, 233)
  ≥ 9 165
(144, 186)
166
(115, 217)
151
(134, 167)
189
(169, 210)

Source of recruitment 0.85
  Community 156
(141, 171)
216
(198, 233)
165
(155, 175)
218
(202, 234)
  Kaiser Permanente 174
(159, 181)
214
(188, 239)
158
(144, 171)
181
(155, 207)
a

Adjusted for age, race, BMI, education, number of children, employment, depression, baby's age, gestational diabetes, recruitment site, years lived in HI.

b

Treatment effect was assessed by a mixed growth model and the F test of the fixed 2-way interaction parameter for time and study condition for overall and of the 3-way interaction parameter for characteristic level, time, and study condition. The relevant main and interaction parameters (in units of MVPA minutes) for the overall model are as follows: 3.562 (SE=0.849, p<0.0001) for time in months, 0.388 (SE=9.522, p=0.97) for condition and 0.648 (SE=1.258, p=0.61) for the time and condition interaction.

c

Other group excluded in comparison

4. Discussion

The Nā Mikimiki Project compared the effectiveness of two 12-month PA interventions, both of which had online components. The tailored intervention included 17 telephone counseling calls when MVPA goals were set and barriers were resolved. As hypothesized, the 12-month increase in self-reported MVPA was significantly greater in the tailored telephone counseling intervention (202 min/week) over the 12 month intervention, than in the website only condition (110 min/wk). Conversely, the accelerometry MVPA showed increases over the 12 month period (from 163 to 215 min/wk for TTCW and 162 to 203 min/wk for SWO), but condition differences were not statistically significant.

Due to differences in study samples (e.g., race/ethnicity, BMI, and age of infant), length of the PA intervention, intervention methods (e.g., group-based versus home-based PA), study outcomes (weight loss versus PA alone) and methods for assessing MPVA, it is difficult to directly compare this study’s findings with those of previous studies with postpartum women. However, two previous PA interventions with postpartum ethnic minority women, over a comparable time period, reported non-significant increases in PA.(Ostbye et al., 2009; Taveras et al., 2011) Thus, this study’s significant differential increase in self-reported MVPA for a 12-month tailored MVPA telephone plus website intervention represents a unique finding for postpartum women with infants. Several other studies with postpartum women have reported similar between-group differences in minutes/week of MVPA following a PA intervention, but their interventions were shorter (i.e., 8–12 weeks) or used supervised PA classes.(Clarke et al., 2007; Cramp & Brawley, 2006; Fahrenwald et al., 2004; Fjeldsoe et al., 2010; Maturi, Afshary, & Abedi, 2011; H. D. McIntyre et al., 2012; Monteiro et al., 2014)

This study successfully recruited 311 postpartum women but had difficulty with retention and completion of study assessments, largely due to participants becoming pregnant. Seventy percent of women in the TTCW condition received most (76%) of the planned telephone contacts over 12 months. Although most participants in both conditions visited their condition-specific website at least once and anonymous 12-month evaluations of TTCW’s helpfulness and satisfaction with its components were very high (see Appendix), the number of repeat visits to the website were suboptimal, particularly among the TTCW participants after the first 2–3 months of the intervention. The TTCW website was updated regularly with a list of local events appropriate for new mothers with infants or other children, so new information was available over time. However, the two condition-specific websites were not formatted for a Smartphone, so participants may have found accessing them via a desktop/laptop inconvenient as their infants became mobile. Future online interventions’ text/photos/videos should be formatted so they are easily viewed on a Smartphone.

Although the Nā Mikimiki Project’s sample was similar to postpartum samples reported in previous PA intervention studies with respect to age of mother, marital status, percent primiparous, and average number of children(Albright et al., 2012; Chang et al., 2010; Fjeldsoe et al., 2010; E. Norman, Sherburn, Osborne, & Galea, 2010; Ostbye et al., 2009), the proportion of ethnic minority women (85%) was higher than in two studies that included African American postpartum women (Mothers in Motion (MIM=52%) and Active Mothers Postpartum (AMP=45%).(Chang et al., 2010; Ostbye et al., 2009) Other socio-demographic factors that differed across these studies were lactation rates, women’s employment status, BMI and infant’s age.(Albright et al., 2012) Some of these socio-demographic characteristics were controlled for in these studies’ analyses; however, the adjustment was not consistent across studies and moderator analyses were not consistently reported. Although our sample consisted of several culturally distinct races in sufficient numbers (white, Japanese, Filipino, Asian mixed, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders, and more than one ethnicity/race), race was not a significant moderator of the increase in MVPA. None of the three previous PA intervention studies with postpartum women that included African-American or Hispanic women reported differences by race/ethnicity in their PA outcomes.(Chang et al., 2010; Clarke et al., 2007; Ostbye et al., 2009) Therefore, it appears that when a MVPA intervention is culturally sensitive and carefully tailored to meet the needs of its population, participants respond equally well across race/ethnic groups.

In any long-term study, retention is a key component in the interpretation of a study’s results. The proportion of the Na Mikimiki sample that completed multiple follow-up surveys over 12 months was comparable to the rates reported by Ostbye and colleagues(Ostbye et al., 2009), with pregnancy being a primary reason for loss-to-follow up in both studies.

An interesting finding was that women with 2 or more children responded better to the TTCW intervention than those with one child; however, there were no differences between these two groups in the time spent on the telephone with the counselor (p=0.83). The ability of women with two or more children to increase their MVPA, more than those with one child, could reflect better time management skills, or being more secure in their role as a mother and not “feeling guilty” if they spent time on themselves for PA.

The results from the self-reported data and accelerometer data differed for MVPA; the subjective measure confirmed the hypothesis, while the objective measure did not. The difference could be due to several factors, including recall bias for the surveys and reactivity caused by the accelerometer.(Clemes & Deans, 2012; Motl, McAuley, & Dlugonski, 2012) The latter is more likely as the women in this study reported performing little MVPA on the survey. Yet, the levels registered by the accelerometer at baseline suggested that they were physically active. Also, the mean MVPA min/week was very similar for the two methodologies at 12 months when the novelty of the accelerometer would have subsided. This was confirmed by the fact that among women below the median for PA accelerometer level at baseline, the TTCW condition exhibited a greater change in PA than the SWO condition, while this was not true for the women above the median (p=0.053). Comparing results that used different types of evidence calls to attention the important differences between measurement methods. For example, women would likely perceive walking while pushing a stroller or walking with the baby in a shoulder-strap carrier as moderate-vigorous activity. Objective measures of energy expenditure confirm the accuracy of this perception. (W.J. Brown, Ringuet, Trost, & Jenkins, 2001) However, the accelerometer would count this activity as ‘light’ because of the lower velocity/acceleration, without accounting for added effort when the user is pushing or carrying a heavy object. This illustrates the importance of multiple indicators of PA when assessing intervention effectiveness to capture the complexity of PA. Conclusions on the effectiveness of an intervention using a single methodology may miss important related outcomes.(Nigg, Jordon, & Atkins, 2012)

Limitations

Since the Nā Mikimiki sample included a high proportion of married women with relatively high educational achievement (78% college educated), the results may not be generalizable to women from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Also, given that the sample consisted of women who were interested in becoming more active, they may have been more receptive to the intervention than other postpartum women. Another limitation was that, by 12 months, loss-to follow-up was 25% for the surveys and 37% for the accelerometers. Also, attrition tended to be differential; perhaps because of the commitment involved; this could have led to biased results. However, results from several types of sensitivity analyses verified that patterns of missing data did not bias the results. Also the correlates of attrition in our study are similar to those found in other exercise interventions and weight loss interventions involving physical activity, which include age, education, and a higher BMI.(Linke, Gallo, & Norman, 2011; Moroshko, Brennan, & O'Brien, 2011; Neve, Collins, & Morgan, 2010; Peels et al., 2012) Nonetheless, future physical activity interventions should make every effort to retain participants with, for example, a higher BMI at baseline, by including strategies/messages that directly address issues important to this subgroup (i.e., being physically active is important regardless of how much you weigh or whether you are trying to lose weight or not). Also, lower retention rates for ethnic minorities in randomized clinical trials are a concern;(Arikawa, O'Dougherty, Kaufman, Schmitz, & Kurzer, 2012; Moroshko et al., 2011; Murphy & Williams, 2013; Osann et al., 2011) however, we used several strategies that have been shown to maximize retention in clinical trials (i.e., establishing rapport, participants’ perception of the study as informative, etc.)(Barnett, Aquilar, Brittner, & Bonuck, 2012; D. R. Brown, Fouad, Basen-Engquist, & Tortolero-Luna, 2000; Butler et al., 2013) Further studies are needed on the sustainability of the behavior changes achieved. A further limitation is that the separate treatment effects attributable to the mom-tailored website and the attention due to the tailored telephone counseling calls cannot be distinguished because the TTCW intervention was designed to include both the online and telephone elements.

5. Conclusion

This was the first study to compare the effectiveness of two online PA interventions using a sample composed largely of postpartum women with Asian American and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander heritage. Over 12 months both interventions effectively increased MVPA as measured via self report and accelerometer. However, the tailored intervention yielded significantly greater improvements in self-reported MVPA than the standard condition. The positive results over a time period that was demonstrably longer than most previous studies (12 months versus 2–6 months) and the finding that the tailored intervention was more effective in women with two or more children, than in women with one child, represent unique and noteworthy contributions to the literature. These results are also in contrast to other weight loss or PA interventions that failed to show any significant change in MVPA in postpartum women.

Supplementary Material

Highlights.

  • Compared effectiveness of 2 moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) conditions

  • Randomized controlled trial recruited 311 postnatal women, followed for 12-months

  • Telephone/website intervention was tailored to ethnic minority women with infants

  • Tailored condition increased MVPA minutes/week more than standard (p = 0.027)

  • Mothers with ≥ 2 children increased MVPA more than those with one child (p=0.016).

Acknowledgements

The project described was supported by NIH Award Numbers CA115614 and CA115614–03S1 from the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the NIH.

The authors would like to thank and show sincere appreciation to the following individuals who contributed to the implementation and completion of this study’s intervention and assessments: Andrea Dunn, PhD, Lillian McCollum,MPH, Trina Orimoto, PhD, Leslie Welsh, Regina Suyderhoud, Peter Hinely, Yeehwa G. Daida, and Jennifer L Elia, MPH.

The study sponsor, NIH-NCI, had no role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Registration number: NCT00810342

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Contributor Information

Cheryl L. Albright, Email: cherylal@hawaii.edu.

Alana D. Steffen, Email: steffena@uic.edu.

Lynne R. Wilkens, Email: lynne@cc.hawaii.edu.

Kami K. White, Email: kwhite@cc.hawaii.edu.

Rachel Novotny, Email: novotny@hawaii.edu.

Claudio R. Nigg, Email: cnigg@hawaii.edu.

Kara Saiki, Email: knsaiki@hawaii.edu.

Wendy J. Brown, Email: wbrown@hms.uq.edu.au.

References

  1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and met intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498–S516. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albright CL, Maddock JE, Nigg CR. Physical activity before pregnancy and following childbirth in a multiethnic sample of healthy women. Women and Health. 2005;42(3):95–110. doi: 10.1300/j013v42n03_06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albright CL, Pruitt L, Castro C, Gonzalez A, Woo S, King AC. Modifying physical activity in a multiethnic sample of low-income women: One-year results from the impact (increasing motivation for physical activity) project. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005;30(3):191–200. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3003_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albright CL, Maddock JE, Nigg CR. Increasing physical activity in postpartum multiethnic women in hawaii: Results from a pilot study. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Albright CL, Steffen AD, Novotny R, Nigg CR, Wilkens LR, Saiki K, Brown WJ. Baseline results from hawaii's na mikimiki project: A physical activity intervention tailored to multiethnic postpartum women. Women Health. 2012;52(3):265–291. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2012.662935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Allender S, Hutchinson L, Foster C. Life-change events and participation in physical activity: A systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(2):160–172. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arikawa AY, O’Dougherty M, Kaufman BC, Schmitz KH, Kurzer MS. Attrition and adherence of young women to aerobic exercise: Lessons from the wiser study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(2):298–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnett J, Aquilar S, Brittner M, Bonuck K. Recruiting and retaining low-income, multi-ethnic women into randomized controlled trials: Successful strategies and staffing. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(5):925–932. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellows-Riecken KH, Rhodes RE. A birth of inactivity? A review of physical activity and parenthood. Prev Med. 2008;46(2):99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borodulin K, Evenson KR, Herring AH. Physical activity patterns during pregnancy through postpartum. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown DR, Fouad MN, Basen-Engquist K, Tortolero-Luna G. Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials. Annals of Epidemiology. 2000;10(8 Suppl):S13–S21. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00197-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown WJ, Bauman AE. Comparison of estimates of population levels of physical activity using two measures. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(5):520–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown WJ, Burton NW, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Reliability and validity of a modified self-administered version of the active australia physical activity survey in a sample of mid-age women. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008;32(6):535–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown WJ, Heesch KC, Miller YD. Life events and changing physical activity patterns in women at different life stages. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(3):294–305. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9099-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown WJ, Trost SG. Life transitions and changing physical activity patterns in young women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;25(2):140–143. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown WJ, Trost SG, Bauman A, Mummery K, Owen N. Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(2):205–215. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(04)80010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown WJ, Ringuet C, Trost SG, Jenkins DJ. Measurement of energy expenditure of daily tasks among mothers of young children. J Sci Med Sport. 2001;4(4):379–385. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80047-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Butler A, QUinn SC, Fryer CS, Garza MA, Kim KH, Thomas SB. Characterizing researchers by strategies used for retaining minority participants: Results of a national survey. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;36(1):61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cavallo DN, Tate DF, Ries AV, Brown JD, DeVellis RF, Ammerman AS. A social media-based physical activity intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):527–532. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang MW, Nitzke S, Brown R. Design and outcomes of a mothers in motion behavioral intervention pilot study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(3 Suppl):S11–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen AH, Sallis JF, Castro CM, Hickman SA, Lee RE. A home-based behavioral intervention to promote walking in sedentary ethnic minority women: Project walk. Women’s Health: Research in Gender, Behavior and Policy. 1998;4:19–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Clarke KK, Freeland-Graves J, Klohe-Lehman DM, Milani TJ, Nuss HJ, Laffrey S. Promotion of physical activity in low-income mothers using pedometers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(6):962–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Clemes SA, Deans NK. Presence and duration of reactivity to pedometers in adults. Medicine and Sciences in Sports and Exercise. 2012;44(6):1097–1101. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318242a377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Collins R, Lee RE, Albright CL, King AC. Ready to be physically active? The effects of a course preparing low income multiethnic women to be more physically active. Health Education & Behavior. 2004;11:1–18. doi: 10.1177/1090198103255529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cramp AG, Brawley LR. Moms in motion: A group-mediated cognitive-behavioral physical activity intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:23. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Da Costa D, Lowensteyn I, Abrahamowicz M, Ionescu-Ittu R, Dritsa M, Rippen N, Khalife S. A randomized clinical trial of exercise to alleviate postpartum depressed mood. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(3):191–200. doi: 10.1080/01674820903212136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Davenport MH, Giroux I, Sopper MM, Mottola MF. Postpartum exercise regardless of intensity improves chronic disease risk factors. Medicine and Sciences in Sports and Exercise. 2011;43(6):951–958. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182051155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Durham HA, Morey MC, Lovelady CA, Namenek Brouwer RJ, Krause KM, Ostbye T. Postpartum physical activity in overweight and obese women. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(7):988–993. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.7.988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Eakin EG, Lawler SP, Vandelanotte C, Owen N. Telephone interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5):419–434. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Engberg E, Alen M, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Peltonen JE, Tikkanen HO, Pekkarinen H. Life events and change in leisure time physical activity: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42(5):433–447. doi: 10.2165/11597610-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Evenson KR, Herring AH, Wen F. Self-reported and objectively measured physical activity among a cohort of postpartum women: The pin postpartum study. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(1):5–20. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fahrenwald NL, Atwood JR, Walker SN, Johnson DR, Berg K. A randomized pilot test of "moms on the move": A physical activity intervention for wic mothers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004;27(2):82–90. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fahrenwald NL, Walker SN. Application of the transtheoretical model of behavior change to the physical activity behavior of wic mothers. Public Health Nursing. 2003;20(4):307–317. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fanning J, Mullen SP, McAuley E. Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: A meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fjeldsoe BS, Miller YD, Marshall AL. Mobilemums: A randomized controlled trial of an sms-based physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med. 2010;39(2):101–111. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9170-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fjeldsoe BS, Miller YD, O’Brien JL, Marshall AL. Iterative development of mobilemums: A physical activity intervention for women with young children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:151. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fjeldsoe BS, Winkler EA, Marshall AL, Eakin EG, Reeves MM. Active adults recall their physical activity differently to less active adults: Test-retest reliability and validity of a physical activity survey. Health Promot J Austr. 2013;24(1):26–31. doi: 10.1071/HE12912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Friedman LS, Furberg CD, Demets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Spring Science-Business Media, LLC; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  40. Garcia AW, King AC. Predicting long-term adherence to aerobic exercise: A comparison of two models. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1991;13:394–410. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gilson Nicholas D, Faulkner Guy, Murphy Marie H, Meyer M, Renee Umstattd, Washington Tracy, Ryde Gemma C, Dillon Kimber A. Walk@work: An automated intervention to increase walking in university employees not achieving 10,000 daily steps. Preventive Medicine. 2013;56(5):283–287. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.022. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gould Rothberg BE, Magriples U, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, Ickovics JR. Gestational weight gain and subsequent postpartum weight loss among young, low-income, ethnic minority women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011;204(1):52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.028. e51-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Haas JS, Jackson RA, Fuentes-Afflick E, Stewart AL, Dean ML, Brawarsky P, Escobar GJ. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(1):45–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40097.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Application of random-effects of pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods. 1997;2(1):64–78. [Google Scholar]
  45. Heesch KC, Masse LC, Dunn AL. Using rasch modeling to re-evaluate three scales related to physical activity: Enjoyment, perceived benefits and perceived barriers. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(Suppl 1):i58–i72. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hinton PS, Olson CM. Postpartum exercise and food intake: The importance of behavior-specific self-efficacy. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001a;101(12):1430–1437. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00345-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hinton PS, Olson CM. Predictors of pregnancy-associated change in physical activity in a rural white population. Matern Child Health J. 2001b;5(1):7–14. doi: 10.1023/a:1011315616694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hogue J, Benezra K. The digital lives of power moms. 2009 Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/newswire/uploads/2009/06/powermoms_webinar.pdf.
  49. Ka’opua LS, Park SH, Ward ME, Braun KL. Testing the feasibility of a culturally tailored breast cancer screening intervention with native hawaiian women in rural churches. Health Soc Work. 2011;36(1):55–65. doi: 10.1093/hsw/36.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Ayabe M, Yoshioka M, Yoshitake Y, Shindo M, Tanaka H. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: A validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Br J Nutrition. 2004;91:235–243. doi: 10.1079/BJN20031033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Linke SE, Gallo LC, Norman GJ. Attrition and adherence rates of sustained vs. Intermittent exercise interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(2):197–209. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9279-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley-Interscience, Inc; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lombard CB, Deeks AA, Ball K, Jolley D, Teede HJ. Weight, physical activity and dietary behavior change in young mothers: Short term results of the help-her cluster randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2009;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Marcus BH, Ciccolo JT, Sciamanna CN. Using electronic/computer interventions to promote physical activity. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(2):102–105. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.053744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Marcus BH, Dubbert PM, Forsyth LH, McKenzie TL, Stone EJ, Dunn AL, Blair SN. Physical activity behavior change: Issues in adoption and maintenance. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1 Suppl):32–41. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Marshall AL, Bauman AE, Owen N, Booth ML, Crawford D, Marcus BH. Population-based randomized controlled trial of a stage-targeted physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(3):194–202. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2503_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Marshall AL, Miller YD, Graves N, Barnett AG, Fjeldsoe BS. Moving mobilemums forward: Protocol for a larger randomized controlled trial of an improved physical activity program for women with young children. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):593. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Maturi MS, Afshary P, Abedi P. Effect of physical activity intervention based on a pedometer on physical activity level and anthropometric measures after childbirth: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mau MK, Glanz K, Severino R, Grove JS, Johnson B, Curb JD. Mediators of lifestyle behavior change in native hawaiians: Initial findings from the native hawaiian diabetes intervention program. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(10):1770–1775. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Glenn BA, Taylor VM, Nguyen TT, Stewart SL, Chen MS., Jr Developing theoretically based and culturally appropriate interventions to promote hepatitis b testing in 4 asian american populations, 2006–2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E72. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. McIntyre CA, Rhodes RE. Correlates of leisure-time physical activity during transitions to motherhood. Women Health. 2009;49(1):66–83. doi: 10.1080/03630240802690853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. McIntyre HD, Peacock A, Miller YD, Koh D, Marshall AL. Pilot study of an individualised early postpartum intervention to increase physical activity in women with previous gestational diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2012:892019. doi: 10.1155/2012/892019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. McLaughlin LA, Braun KL. Asian and pacific islander cultural values: Considerations for health care decision making. Health Soc Work. 1998;23(2):116–126. doi: 10.1093/hsw/23.2.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Metzger BE. Long-term outcomes in mothers diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(4):972–979. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31815a61d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Miller YD, Trost SG, Brown WJ. Mediators of physical activity behavior change among women with young children. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(2 Suppl):98–103. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00484-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Monteiro SM, Jancey J, Dhaliwal SS, Howat PA, Burns S, Hills AP, Anderson AS. Results of a randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity behaviours in mothers with young children. Prev Medicine. 2014;59:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P. Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2011;12(11):912–934. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Motl RW, McAuley E, Dlugonski D. Reactivity in baseline accelerometer data from a physical activity behavioral intervention. Health Psychol. 2012;31(2):172–175. doi: 10.1037/a0025965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Murphy PJ, Williams RL. Weight-loss study in african-american women: Lessons learned from project take heed and future, technologically enhanced directions. Perm J. 2013;17(2):55–59. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus, statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Sixth ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2010. [Google Scholar]
  71. Neve MJ, Collins CE, Morgan PJ. Dropout, nonusage attrition, and pretreatment predictors of nonusage attrition in a commercial web-based weight loss program. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(4):e69. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nigg CR, Jordon PJ, Atkins A. Behavioral measurement in exercise psychology. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, Kamata A, editors. Measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2012. pp. 455–464. [Google Scholar]
  73. Norman E, Sherburn M, Osborne RH, Galea MP. An exercise and education program improves well-being of new mothers: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2010;90(3):348–355. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Norman JF, Pozehl BJ, Duncan KA, Hertzog MA, Krueger SK. Effects of exercise training versus attention on plasma b-type natriuretic peptide, 6-minute walk test and quality of life in individuals with heart failure. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012;23(4):19–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Olson CM, Strawderman MS, Hinton PS, Pearson TA. Gestational weight gain and postpartum behaviors associated with weight change from early pregnancy to 1 y postpartum. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 2003;27(1):117–127. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Osann K, Wenzel L, Dogan A, Hsieh S, Chase DM, Sappington S, Nelson EL. Recruitment and retention results for a population-based cervical cancer biobehavioral clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(3):558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ostbye T, Krause KM, Lovelady CA, Morey MC, Bastian LA, Peterson BL, McBride CM. Active mothers postpartum: A randomized controlled weight-loss intervention trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;37(3):173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Peels DA, Bolman C, Golsteijn RH, De Vries H, Mudde AN, van Stralen MM, Lechner L. Differences in reach and attrition between web-based and print-delivered tailored interventions among adults over 50 years of age: Clustered randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e179. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Reeves MM, Marshall AL, Owen N, Winkler EA, Eakin EG. Measuring physical activity change in broad-reach intervention trials. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(2):194–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Resnicow K, Baranowski T, Ahluwalia JS, Braithwaite RL. Cultural sensitivity in public health: Defined and demystified. Ethn Dis. 1999;9(1):10–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Zinman B, Hanley AJ. Gestational diabetes and postpartum physical activity: Evidence of lifestyle change 1 year after delivery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18(7):1323–1329. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Alcaraz JE, Gehrman C, Johnson MF. Potential mediators of change in a physical activity promotion course for university students: Project grad. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(2):149–158. doi: 10.1007/BF02908296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Preventive Medicine. 1987;16:825–836. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Samuels Tiana Y, Raedeke Thomas D, Mahar Matthew T, Karvinen Kristina H, DuBose Katrina D. A randomized controlled trial of continuous activity, short bouts, and a 10,000 step guideline in inactive adults. Preventive Medicine. 2011;52(2):120–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  86. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods, eighth edition. Ames, Iowa State: University Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  87. Taveras EM, Blackburn K, Gillman MW, Haines J, McDonald J, Price S, Oken E. First steps for mommy and me: A pilot intervention to improve nutrition and physical activity behaviors of postpartum mothers and their infants. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(8):1217–1227. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0696-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. United States Census Bureau. 2010 demographic profile data. DP-1- Geogrpahy- Hawaii: Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010. 2010 Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk.
  89. United States Census Bureau. Hawaii quick facts 2011 population. State and County Quick Facts. 2011 Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/15000.html.
  90. United States Census Bureau. The asian population, 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. 2012a Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-11.pdf.
  91. United States Census Bureau. The native hawaiian and other pacific islander population: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. 2012b Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-12.pdf.
  92. Walker LO, Fowles ER, Sterling BS. The distribution of weight-related risks among low-income women during the first postpartum year. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40(2):198–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES