Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014 Nov 8;39(0):92–104. doi: 10.1159/000366411

Pathological Correlates of White Matter Hyperintensities on MRI

Yong S Shim a,*, Dong-Won Yang a, Catherine M Roe b, Mary A Coats b, Tammie L Benzinger b, Chengjie Xiong b, James E Galvin c, Nigel J Cairns b, John C Morris b,*
PMCID: PMC4312498  NIHMSID: NIHMS626124  PMID: 25401390

Abstract

Background/Aims

We investigated the histopathological correlates of White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD), cerebrovascular disease, and aged controls.

Methods

We reviewed 57 participants who had both neuroimaging and neuropathology. In addition to AD pathology, cortical microinfarcts, lacunes, and cerebral hemorrhages were assessed. Small vessel disease included arteriolosclerosis and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Postmortem brain tissue corresponding to regions of WMHs were investigated in 14 participants; variables included: demyelination of the deep and periventricular WM, atrophy of the ventricular ependyma, and thickness of blood vessels. Partial Spearman rank test and linear regression analysis, adjusted for age at the clinical evaluation and the duration to death, were performed.

Results

The severity of arteriosclerosis was correlated with the MRI-estimated volume of periventricular hyperintensity (PVH). Deep white matter hyperintensity (DWMH) volume was correlated with the presence of cortical microinfarcts and cerebral hemorrhages. The severity of the breakdown of the ventricular lining was correlated with PVHs and DWMHs correlated with the severity of deep WM demyelination. The diameter of small blood vessels was not associated with WMHs.

Conclusion

WMHs are consistent with small vessel disease and increased tissue water content. We found no association between WMHs and thickness of small blood vessels.

Keywords: small vessel disease, dementia, neuropathology, leukoaraiosis

Introduction

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) appear as lesions of increased signal intensity on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences [1]. They are frequently observed in healthy older adults as well as patients with dementia including those with Alzheimer's disease (AD). In healthy older adults, WMHs are mostly regarded as a normal aging phenomenon, but severe WMHs have been associated with loss of specific cognitive functions such as psychomotor speed [2], although the association is weak and inconsistent [3-5]. In patients with AD, some studies have indicated that WMHs have an additive effect on cognitive decline, whereas others could not confirm this association [6-8]. A possible explanation for the inconsistent and weak associations between WMHs and clinical symptoms is heterogeneity in the neuropathology [9, 10].

WMHs have been correlated with cerebrovascular risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular disease [11-13], and are generally considered to be of vascular origin. They have been associated with arterial disease including intimal hyperplasia, atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, and lipohyalinosis [14]. Arterioles penetrating from the pial surface arteries have limited collateral supply and may contribute to white matter ischemia [14]. When severe, these ischemic areas may become necrotic and cystic lesions resulting from complete infarcts. However, the etiology of most WMHs, which are non-necrotic, is less clear. Underlying neuropathologic findings including myelin pallor (axon loss), reduced oligodendroglia numbers, astrocytosis, and microvacuolation may suggest other mechanisms [15-19]. Candidates include focal loss of ependymal lining with demyelination and gliosis, allowing leakage of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid [16, 17]; accumulation of interstitial fluid in the perivascular spaces [18], edema related to blood-brain barrier disruption [19], and inflammatory processes involving microglial cells [20, 21]. Some studies have failed to find any correlation between WMHs and neuropathology [22, 23]. The reasons for such disparate findings are unclear, but the difficulty of performing neuropathologic studies of areas identified by imaging may have contributed to the variable data together with variation in the selection criteria of cases and the selection of neuropathologic variables.

To address these diverse findings, we investigated the histopathological correlates of WMHs in longitudinally assessed participants with well-defined advanced risk factors for cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), and aged controls.

Methods

From December 1995 to November 2000 a total of 165 participants was enrolled in a longitudinal study at the Washington University School of Medicine Memory and Aging Project [24] called the ‘Cognitive Change in Cerebrovascular Disease’ (CCCVD, 1430653611A1) project, which included clinical assessments, brain MRI, and autopsies. The sample consisted of three cohorts: participants with advanced risk for CVD (n=65), participants with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) (n=48), and healthy, cognitively normal volunteers (n=52). Participants with advanced risk for CVD were recruited from subjects who had angiographic evidence of at least 50% stenosis of one or both common carotid or internal carotid arteries (carotid stenosis: CS), who did not undergo carotid endarterectomy, and local, St. Louis metropolitan area participants who were enrolled in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) [25], with isolated systolic hypertension (systolic blood pressure between 160-219 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg). Participants with DAT and healthy volunteers were also recruited from the Washington University Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). Diagnostic criteria for DAT was comparable with ‘probable AD’ according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) [26]. With all participants, experienced clinicians conducted semistructured interviews with each participant and with a collateral source who was knowledgeable about the participant. A comprehensive health history was obtained from the collateral source and included: the presence or history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stroke, or a transient ischemic attack. Trained registered nurses measured blood pressure at each annual visit using a manual cuff on the right arm or the left arm. Exclusion criteria were the presence of any of the following: 1) other neurological disorders, including parkinsonism, Huntington's disease, communicating hydrocephalus, infection, brain tumor, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorder, and cerebral trauma; 2) psychiatric disorders including major affective disorder, schizophrenia, alcoholism, or other substance abuse; and 3) reversible dementias and other medical disorders that may impair cognition, including overmedication; impaired pulmonary, cardiac, renal or hepatic function; anemia, hypothyroidism, vitamin B12 deficiency, malignancy, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Within 3 months of clinical assessment, brain MRI was performed using a 1.5 Tesla image scanner (Siemens, Erlanger, Germany).

Both during and after the study ended, participants were followed up annually at the Knight ADRC. After death, brain autopsies were performed on 60 participants (18 with a CVD risk factor, 27 with DAT, and 15 healthy aged volunteers) as of December 2009. Of the 60 participants who had an autopsy, FLAIR MRI was available for review in 57 participants (Figure 1).

Fig. 1. Participants enrolled in the present study and their pathological findings.

Fig. 1

At autopsy, numbers in parentheses represent cases with pathologic features of cerebrovascular disease contributing to their cognitive status.

*Among 23 subjects with pathologic evidence of cerebrovascular disease, vascular disease was considered primarily responsible for the cognitive status in 3 subjects (Two had AD and 1 was a CS at clinical enrollment).

CVD, cerebrovascular disease; DAT, dementia of the Alzheimer type; SHEP, Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program; CS, Carotid stenosis; AD, Alzheimer's disease.

Using the FLAIR images, a 3D-Slicer version 3.6 (3D-slicer, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) was used to measure the volume of WMH semi-automatically. WMHs were further distinguished by location into periventricular WMHs (PVHs), which were directly adjacent to the lateral ventricles, and deep WMHs (DWMHs), which were located in the subcortical white matter. To correct for differences in head size, WMH volumes, including PVH and DWMH, were normalized by the total intracranial volume. For comparison, as a proxy for brain atrophy on FLAIR MRI, the ventricular volume, a global measure of the entire ventricular system, was also measured and classified as the ventricular index (VI).

Histology and immunohistochemistry were undertaken using a standard protocol [27]. Briefly, histological stains included: hematoxylin and eosin, Luxol-fast blue Nissl, and a modified Bielschowsky silver impregnation. Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-beta-amyloid (10D5), phosphorylated tau (PHF1), and alpha-synuclein (LB509) antibodies. We used Braak and Braak's neurofibrillary tangle stage [28], and the presence of plaques was assessed according to the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) guidelines [29]. The neuropathological diagnosis of AD was determined using the criteria of the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Ronal Reagan Institute [30]. Vascular pathology was rated according to the criteria of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) [31] Neuropathology Manual Version 9.1 (available at https://www.alz.washington.edu/WEB/forms-np.html). Large vessel disease (atherosclerosis of the arteries of the Circle of Willis, basilar, vertebral and carotid arteries) and small vessel disease (arteriolosclerosis and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)) were each rated on a 4-point scale (0-3 scale). Additionally, the presence of large artery cerebral infarcts, cortical microinfarcts, lacunes, cerebral hemorrhages, and subcortical arteriosclerotic leukoencephalopathy [32, 33] was recorded.

In addition, we studied areas of tissue corresponding to WMH regions in 14 participants. The severity of their WMHs was relevant to DWMHs ≥2 or PVHs =3, according to the Fazekas’ visual rating scale [34]. Microscopic features included: demyelination of the deep and periventricular white matter (WM), atrophy of the ventricular ependyma, and number and diameter of the blood vessels in the WM. Demyelination of the WM was scored subjectively, ranging from normal to severe demyelination (0-3). Atrophy of the ventricular ependyma was assessed semi-quantitatively (scale: 0-3) (Figure 2). The number of blood vessels was categorized as 1 (below 10), 2 (11-20), or 3 (over 20) per × 10 microscope field.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Demonstration of visual rating scores for demyelination and atrophy of the ventricular ependyma. Tissue was assessed by: 1) estimating the percentage loss of myelinated axons; and 2) estimating the loss of ventricular ependyma; left to right: grade 0 (0 to 25%) to grade 3 (75 to 100%).

Demyelination (x40, Modified Bielschowsky silver impregnation & Hematoxylin and eosin)

Atrophy of ventricular ependyma (x10, Hematoxylin and eosin)

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Subject demographics, neuropathology, and quantitative MRI measurements were compared between three groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Quantitative MRI measurements were also compared using the Mann-Whitney U test between groups with and without the presence of specific pathologic features. The relationships between clinical characteristics including MRI data and neuropathological measures were assessed using partial Spearman rank test and linear regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for age at the clinical evaluation as well as the duration to death. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

1. Demographic data

Data from 57 participants (31 males and 26 females) were reviewed in this study. At clinical evaluation, there were 14 controls, 17 at advanced risk for CVD (11 SHEP and 6 CS), and 26 had DAT. At the last visit with available FLAIR MRI, the mean age of the clinical enrollment groups was different (p<0.001): control (84.14±5.99 (mean±s.d.)); advanced risk for CVD (80.35±8.93); SHEP (84.73±3.29) and CS (72.33±10.69); and DAT (74.88±9.18). Duration from clinical evaluation to autopsy was 6.12±3.26 years, and this did not differ between the clinical groups. After adjusting for age, the clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SB), Hachinski ischemic scale (HIS), and history of hypertension were different among the groups (all, p<0.001). Other characteristics including gender, years of education, and diabetes history were not significantly different between the groups. MRI parameters of WMHs including PVHs and DWMHs, and VI were not significantly different across the three groups (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and MRI findings of participants

Control (n=14) Advanced risk for CVD
DAT (n=26) p value*
(n=17) SHEP (n=11) CS (n=6)
Age upon clinical evaluation (years) 84.14±5.99 80.35±8.93 84.73±3.29 72.33±10.69 74.88±9.18 <0.001
Age on autopsy (years) 90.93±5.95 86.47±8.94 90.82±5.47 78.50±8.83 80.65±9.15 <0.001
Duration to autopsy (years) 6.79±2.52 6.12±4.09 6.09±4.04 6.17±4.58 5.77±3.06 0.694
Gender (M:F) 5:9 10:7 6:5 4:2 16:10 0.421
Education (years) 15.07±3.20 13.18±2.77 13.36±2.38 12.83±3.60 13.04±2.88 0.362
Hypertension history 6 (42.86%) 15 (88.24%) 11 (100.00%) 4 (66.67%) 6 (23.08%) <0.001
DM history 2 (14.29%) 2 (11.76%) 2 (18.18%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (3.85%) 0.383
HIS 0.64±0.93 (0~3) 3.53±3.54 (0~10) 1.91±2.70 (0~9) 6.50±3.02 (2~10) 0.50±1.07 (0~5) <0.001
CDR-SB 0.07±0.18 (0~0.5) 1.26±2.50 (0~9) 1.14±2.66 (0~9) 1.50±2.41 (0~6) 5.15±2.92 (0.5~11) <0.001
MRI findings
    WMHs (mm3) 9.39±10.56 13.66±14.49 10.08±7.32 20.20±22.03 8.21±10.68 0.329
    PVHs (mm3) 8.30±8.74 11.67±13.25 8.43±5.63 17.60±20.81 7.48±9.58 0.465
    DWMHs (mm3) 1.09±2.09 1.99±1.90 1.66±1.84 2.60±2.03 0.73±2.71 0.304
    VI (mm3) 64.43±25.75 67.15±41.18 73.22±49.45 56.03±17.56 61.41±32.57 0.879
    TICV (mm3) 1441.40±118.68 1504.65±143.60 1492.81±158.75 1526.34±121.28 1456.68±169.75 0.657

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range) or number and percentage.

*

Comparisons among the groups on clinical enrollment by using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Age upon clinical evaluation and the duration to death were adjusted for the analyses.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; SHEP, Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program; CS, Carotid stenosis; DAT, dementia of the Alzheimer type; DM; diabetes mellitus; HIS, Hachinski ischemic score; CDR-SB; , clinical dementia ratingsum of boxes; WMHs; white matter hyperintensities; PVHs; periventricular hyperintensities; DWMHs; deep white matter hyperintensities; VI; ventricular index; TICV; total intracranial volume.

Volume of WMH, PVH, and DWMH, and VI increased with the advancing age of participants. The age of participants correlated with WMHs (r=0.36, p=0.005), PVHs (r=0.38, p=0.004), DWMHs (r=0.25, p=0.058), and VI (r=0.32, p=0.014). After adjusting for variables, volumes of WMH and VI were not significantly different across 3 groups and were not associated with sex, education years, CDR-SB, HIS, or the presence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus.

We further divided participants into three groups according to their pathologic findings. Participants who met the ‘high likelihood’ and ‘intermediate likelihood’ of dementia being due to Alzheimer's disease according to the NIA/Reagan Institute criteria were designated as having “AD pathology” (n=30). The reminder were sub-classified into ‘low likelihood’ (n=12) and ‘criteria not met’ (n=15). After adjusting for age and the duration to death, HIS (0.47±0.78 [0~3] in AD pathology, 2.25±3.22 [0~8] in ‘low likelihood’, and 2.73±3.31 [0~10] in ‘criteria not met’, p=0.001) and history of hypertension (8 [26.67%], 9 [75.00%], and 10 [66.67%], p=0.008) at the clinical evaluation were different among the three groups, and the presence of cortical microinfarcts (3 [10.00%], 3 [25.00%], and 9 [60.00%], p=0.002) was also different at autopsy. Participants with cortical microinfarcts at autopsy included five controls, three CS, two SHEP, and five AD at clinical enrollment. Volume of WMH was 6.64±7.20 mm3 in those with AD pathology, 9.36±11.35 mm3 in ‘low likelihood’, and 16.80±16.23 mm3 in the ‘criteria not met’ group (p=0.06).

The neuropathology of the 57 participants who were enrolled in this study and their pathology are shown in Figure 1. There were 23 participants with CVD (5 controls, 5 SHEP, 4 CS, and 9 DAT). Of these 23 participants, vascular disease was considered as the primary etiology of cognitive impairment in only 3 participants.

2. Neuropathology of WMHs

All 57 participants showed pathological evidence of vasculopathy. Arteriosclerosis of small parenchymal or leptomeningeal vessels was the most common finding (n=56, 98.25%), followed by atherosclerosis (n=52, 91.23%), CAA (n=42, 73.68%), lacunes (n=19, 33.33%), cortical microinfarcts (n=15, 26.32%), cerebral hemorrhages (n=8, 14.04%), large artery cerebral infarcts (n=6, 10.63%), and subcortical arteriosclerotic leukoencephalopathy (n=2, 3.51%). These vascular pathologies were not different across the 3 groups according to the clinical presentation at enrollment. The presence of CAA was more frequent in participants with DAT (n=22, 84.62%), although this did not reach significance (p=0.071) (Table 2). The distribution of vascular pathologies was not different between the 14 participants with WMHs and those without.

Table 2.

Findings of ischemic, hemorrhagic and vascular pathology, according to the groups at the clinical enrollment

Control (n=14) CVD risk (n=17)
DAT (n=26) p value*
SHEP (n=11) CS (n=6)
Vascular pathology
    Large artery cerebralinfarcts 1 (7.14%) 3 (17.65%) 1 (9.09%) 2 (33.33%) 2 (7.69%) 0.5 44
    Cortical microinfarcts 5 (35.71%) 5 (29.41%) 2 (18.18%) 3 (50.00%) 5 (19.23%) 0.550
    Lacunes 5 (35.71%) 6 (35.29%) 3 (27.27%) 3 (50.00%) 8 (30.77%) 0.933
    Cerebral hemorrhages 1 (7.14%) 2 (11.76%) 1 (9.09%) 1 (16.67%) 5 (19.23%) 0.627
    Subcortical arteriosclerotic leukoencephalopathy 0 (0.00%) 1 (5.88%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (16.67%) 1 (3.85%) 0.675
    Atherosclerosis (of the circle of Willis) 14 (100.00%) 16 (94.12%) 10 (90.91%) 6 (100.00%) 22 (84.62%) 0.307
    Arteriosclerosis 14 (100.00%) 17 (100.00%) 11 (100.00%) 6 (100.00%) 25 (96.15%) 0.551
    Cerebral amyloid angiopathy 11 (78.57%) 9 (52.94%) 7 (63.64%) 2 (33.33%) 22 (84.62%) 0.071
AD pathology 6 (42.867%) 3 (17.65%) 2 (18.18%) 1 (16.67%) 21 (80.77%)

Values are presented as number (percentage).

*

Comparisons among the groups on clinical enrollment by using the Fisher's exact test.

Age upon clinical evaluation and the duration to death were adjusted for the analyses.

CVD, cerebrovascular disease; SHEP, Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program; CS, Carotid stenosis; DAT, dementia of the Alzheimer type; AD, Alzheimer's disease.

After adjusting for age and the duration to death, the Braak and Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage was inversely correlated with the volume of WMH (r=-0.268, p=0.023) and PVH (r=-0.276, p=0.020). The burden of neuritic and diffuse plaques, according to the CERAD stages, showed a borderline association with WMH (r=-0.180, p=0.092 and r=-0.175, p=0.098). As the volume of DWMH increased, the score of diffuse plaques (r=-0.234, p=0.041), and to some extent the score of neuritic plaques (r=-0.177, p=0.096), decreased. In linear regression analysis, neurofibrillary tangles stage was associated with WMHs (p=0.026) and PVHs (p=0.022) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Linear regression models evaluating the association between neuropathological variables and MRI parameters

Dependent variables Independent variables Regression coefficient Constant R-Square p value
WMHs Neurofibrillary tangles −0.001 0.012 0.070 0.026
Breakdown of ventricular lining 0.006 0.004 0.263 0.035
PVHs Neurofibrillary tangles −0.001 0.011 0.075 0.022
Breakdown of ventricular lining 0.005 0.004 0.234 0.046
Arteriosclerosis 0.002 −0.001 0.078 0.020
DWMHs Microinfarcts 0.001 0.001 0.054 0.045
Cerebral hemorrhages 0.002 0.001 0.095 0.011
Deep WM demyelination 0.002 −0.001 0.427 0.007

Adjusted for age at clinical evaluation and the duration to death.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; WMHs; white matter hyperintensities; PVHs; periventricular hyperintensities; DWMHs; deep white matter hyperintensities; WM, white matter.

The DWMH volume was correlated with cortical microinfarcts (r=0.259, p=0.027) and cerebral hemorrhages (r=0.344, p=0.004). The DWMH volume was 0.84±1.61 mm3 (TICV 1469.98±162.45 mm3) in participants without cortical microinfarct (n=42) and 2.19±3.65 mm3 (TICV 1459.53±115.37 mm3) in those with cortical microinfarcts (n=15; p=0.038), and 0.90±1.65 mm3 (TICV 1477.19±136.94 mm3) in participants without cerebral hemorrhage (n=49) and 3.02±4.65 mm3 (TICV 1406.25±218.68 mm3) in those with cerebral hemorrhages (n=8; p=0.005). The severity of arteriosclerosis was correlated with volume of PVH (r=0.260, p=0.027) and WMH (r=0.213, p=0.058).

In linear regression analysis, DWMH was associated with microinfarcts (p=0.045) and cerebral hemorrhages (p=0.011). PVH was associated with arteriosclerosis (p=0.02) (Table 3).

3. Further evaluation

For further evaluation of the change in small vessel disease, we reviewed the microscopy of tissues corresponding to the WMH regions in 14 participants who had at least some WMHs. The severity of the breakdown of the ventricular lining was correlated with the volume of the WMH and PVH (all, r=0.559, p=0.019) and the volume of DWMH was correlated with deep WM demyelination (r=0.571, p=0.016). Decreased vessel density was observed in the periventricular WM in particular. The number of vessels in the periventricular WM was correlated with volume of WMH (r=-0.400, p=0.078) and PVH (r=-0.401, p=0.078). VI was correlated with deep WM demyelination (r=-0.509, p=0.032). The thickness of blood vessels was not correlated with WMHs.

In regression analysis, loss of ventricular lining was related to WMHs (p=0.035) and PVHs (p=0.046), and deep WM demyelination was related to DWMHs (p=0.007) (Table 3).

Discussion

The present study examined pathological correlates of WMHs in patients with DAT and cognitively normal older adults. We measured the volume of WMH quantitatively, especially PVHs and DWMHs, separately as well as total WMHs. Also we investigated areas of tissue corresponding to WMH regions in subjects with at least some WMHs. We found that DWMHs are associated with deep WM demyelination and the breakdown of the ventricular lining was associated with PVHs and WMHs. In the sample comprising all participants, WMHs inversely correlated with neurofibrillary tangles supporting the concept of synergistic pathologies. Interestingly, neurofibrillary tangles were associated with the volume of PVH and diffuse plaques were associated with the volume of DWMH indicating that AD pathology may contribute to the vascular or white matter pathology. The reasons for these findings are difficult to explain and require further investigation. Our results are, however, similar to previously reported patterns of severe comorbid cerebrovascular lesions in AD patients [35, 36]. In line with these results, our findings could be interpreted to indicate that cerebrovascular lesions lower the threshold for developing clinical symptoms. As the pathological burden of small vessel disease such as arteriosclerosis increased the volume of PVH also increased and there was a correlation between DWMHs and cortical microinfarcts and cerebral hemorrhages.

Previous studies indicate that WMHs may reflect partial loss of myelin and axons, astrogliosis, dilatation of perivascular spaces, and fibrohyalinotic vessel changes [22, 37-39]. This range of tissue changes was thought to reflect incomplete infarction; also, complete infarcts were found to be associated with WMHs with arteriolosclerotic vessel changes in some studies [37, 39, 40]. Regarding the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying WMHs, the role of hypoxia is supported in a number of studies [41-43]. Human cerebral white matter is particularly vulnerable to hypoperfusion due to the impaired perfusion and reduced cerebral blood flow through the terminal long penetrating arterioles [14, 44]. These arteries do not anastomose or form collaterals. The altered blood flow, thereby, results in a watershed phenomenon within the deep white matter. The compensated chronic ischemia may turn into acute hypoxia due to reduced blood pressure. These changes lead to focal neuronal atrophy and the loss of myelin [43]. The resultant hypoxia may not be severe enough to cause cerebral necrosis or damage to the gray matter, but is sufficient to result in white matter changes. Other studies showed arteriolar tortuosity and decreased vessel densities in WMHs [45, 46], which also support an ischemic pathogenesis of WMHs.

In the present study, WMHs were associated with demyelination, loss of ependymal cells, arteriosclerosis, microinfarcts, and cerebral hemorrhages, although not all cases exhibited these characteristics. Loss of myelinated axons and breakdown of the ventricular lining were correlated with DMWHs and PVHs, respectively, as has been demonstrated by previous studies [16, 38, 47]. Breakdown of the ventricular lining and loss of myelinated axons may cause leakage of CSF into the white matter, leading to white matter pallor and higher signal intensity due to ventricular widening and white matter atrophy, which could be caused by subcortical “incomplete infarcts” [48]. However, the term “incomplete infarcts” is controversial and not clearly defined, although it was suggested as being characteristic of leukoaraiosis [49]. Moreover, other studies have suggested that these pathologic findings provide evidence of alternate mechanisms to ischemia because they involve no direct vascular changes [15, 50, 51]. Although we could not observe the correlation directly with vessel thickness, PVHs showed a correlation with arteriolosclerosis, as has been shown in previous studies [39, 47], which could cause hypoperfusion of white matter and somewhat reduced vessel densities. Microinfarcts and cerebral hemorrhages, which correlated with DWMHs in this study, may also be caused by small vessel disease. In contrast to previous studies [42, 43], we could not find any association with vessel thickness. Previous studies classified only severe cases (a Wahlund scale score [52] of 2.5 to 3) as being leukoaraiosis, but our study included only mild WMHs, compared to those two studies.

In clinical studies using MRI, an attempt to improve specificity for WMHs was made by distinguishing between PVHs and DWMHs [34], and histopathology has demonstrated that each type of WMH reflects a distinct pathological change [19, 47, 53-55]. Van Swieten et al. [39] suggested that arteriolosclerosis was the primary causative factor for DWMHs in cognitively normal older adults with cerebrovascular risk factors. PVHs are often considered to be related to normal aging [16, 56], representing the demyelination associated with subependymal gliosis and discontinuity of the ependymal lining [47]. Our study revealed an association between PVHs and neurofibrillary tangles stages and DWMHs with diffuse plaques. Volume of WMH including PVH and DWMH increased with advancing age, and PVHs were associated with loss of ventricular lining. DWMHs were associated with deep WM demyelination. However, microinfarcts and cerebral hemorrhages in DWMHs and arteriosclerosis in PVHs are the likely consequences of small vessel disease [38, 57-59]; thus, our findings of loss of myelin and ventricular lining, might also be considered to result from ischemia or small vessel disease [38, 56]. Previous studies have suggested that mild forms of WMH may not be clinically relevant or even detectable [60], but irregular PVHs and confluent DWMHs correspond to more severe tissue changes, probably of ischemic origin, and are more likely to produce clinical symptoms [40, 47, 54, 60]. The variability in the data may reflect the heterogeneity in the different cohorts studied. For example, in the relatively healthy NUN study cohort, evidence of ischemia was not found in severe DWMHs [61]. Moreover, the significance of WMHs will be different according to the clinical stage of the disease. Individuals with early stage AD may be more vulnerable to the cognitive effect of WMHs than cognitively normal older adults with similar WMHs burden [62]. WMHs have been related to the different etiologies according to severity [63], and WMHs on MRI could be used in addition to complement neuropathological post mortem assessment of subcortical vascular pathology of the WM [64].

The present study has some limitations. First, cerebrovascular risk factors did not correlate significantly with the volume of WMH after adjusting for age, although subjects with advanced risk factors generally displayed higher volumes of WMH. Also, we could not find any associations between WMHs and clinical or pathological variables. This may be due to the small sample size. With a larger sample size, further evaluation classifying the subjects’ cognitive and pathological findings as well as cerebrovascular risk factors could provide more conclusive results. It should be mentioned that the relationship between cerebrovascular lesions and AD pathologies is still controversial, with some studies indicating positive associations [65-68], others indicating negative associations [35, 36, 69], and still others failed to detect any associations [70, 71]. However, the inverse relationship between WMHs and neurofibrillary tangles in this study may support a synergy between white matter pathology and AD. In this study, we did not measure the number of lacunes in contrast to a previous study [59]. Although we did not find an association between WMH and lacunes, we observed that many cases (33.33%) had lacunes which were associated with small vessel disease [38, 57-59]. Lastly, and most importantly, our study does not necessarily prove whether WMHs develop as a result of ischemia or whether they are the consequence of impaired cell metabolism secondary to many other possible processes. Disrupted ependymal lining of the ventricles could result from cerebral atrophy and ventricular dilatation which may be the consequence of neurodegenerative processes rather than small vessel disease [51]. Other proposed mechanisms include blood-brain barrier dysfunction [34, 40, 44, 46, 72, 73], inflammatory processes involving microglial cells [20, 21, 74], altered cerebral blood flow autoregulation, axonal depletion from Wallerian degeneration [75], and intraparenchymal venular disease [76, 77]. All of these potential causes warrant further investigation [14, 49].

Our data indicate that WMHs increase with age, and we can suggest cautiously that WMHs might progress from periventricular WM to deep WM. PVHs increase with arteriosclerosis and DWMHs increase with microinfarcts and cerebral hemorrhages. WMHs correlated with WM pathology including the breakdown of the ventricular lining and deep WM demyelination. These observations are suggestive of a potential increase in water content and possibly, a consequence of small vessel disease, although we could find no association between WMHs and thickness of small vessels.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a grant (No. HI10C2020) from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea and by NIA Grants P50AG005681, P01AG003991, and the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Initiative. We thank tha staff of the Neuropathology Core of the Knight ADRC for their histological expertise and assistance.

Footnotes

We have no disclosure conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Murray AD, Staff RT, Shenkin SD, Deary IJ, Starr JM, Whalley LJ. Brain white matter hyperintensities: relative importance of vascular risk factors in nondemented elderly people. Radiology. 2005;237:251–257. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, van Gijn J, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:145–151. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200002)47:2<145::aid-ana3>3.3.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O'Brien JT, Wiseman R, Burton EJ, Barber B, Wesnes K, Saxby B, Ford GA. Cognitive associations of subcortical white matter lesions in older people. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;977:436–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schmidt R, Ropele S, Enzinger C, Petrovic K, Smith S, Schmidt H, Matthews PM, Fazekas F. White matter lesion progression, brain atrophy, and cognitive decline: the Austrian stroke prevention study. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:610–616. doi: 10.1002/ana.20630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van der Flier WM, van Straaten EC, Barkhof F, Verdelho A, Madureira S, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Erkinjuntti T, Crisby M, Waldemar G, Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Scheltens P. Small vessel disease and general cognitive function in nondisabled elderly: the LADIS study. Stroke. 2005;36:2116–2120. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000179092.59909.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stout JC, Jernigan TL, Archibald SL, Salmon DP. Association of dementia severity with cortical gray matter and abnormal white matter volumes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:742–749. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550080056013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hirono N, Kitagaki H, Kazui H, Hashimoto M, Mori E. Impact of white matter changes on clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease: a quantitative study. Stroke. 2000;31:2182–2188. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.9.2182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mungas D, Jagust WJ, Reed BR, Kramer JH, Weiner MW, Schuff N, Norman D, Mack WJ, Willis L, Chui HC. MRI predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 2001;57:2229–2235. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.12.2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Valk J, Algra PR, van der Hoop RG, Nauta J, Wolters EC. White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease. Evidence for heterogeneity. Brain. 1992;115:735–748. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.3.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Haybaeck J, Loitfelder M, Weis S, Cavalieri M, Seiler S, Enzinger C, Ropele S, Erkinjuntti T, Pantoni L, Scheltens P, Fazekas F, Jellinger K. Heterogeneity in age-related white matter changes. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122:171–185. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0851-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fazekas F, Niederkorn K, Schmidt R, Offenbacher H, Horner S, Bertha G, Lechner H. White matter abnormalities in normal individuals: Correlation with carotid ultrasonography, cerebral blood flow measurements, and cerebrovascular risk factors. Stroke. 1988;19:1285–1288. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.10.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lazarus R, Prettyman R, Cherryman G. White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and their relationship with vascular risk factors in memory clinic attenders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20:274–279. doi: 10.1002/gps.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lechner H, Schmidt R, Bertha G, Justich E, Offenbacher H, Schneider G. Nuclear magnetic resonance image white matter lesions and risk factors for stroke in normal individuals. Stroke. 1988;19:263–265. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.2.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pantoni L, Garcia JH. Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis. Stroke. 1997;28:652–659. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.3.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Simpson JE, Fernando MS, Clark L, Ince PG, Matthews F, Forster G, O'Brien JT, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Brayne C, Shaw PJ, Lewis CE, Wharton SB. MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group: White matter lesions in an unselected cohort of the elderly: astrocytic, microglial and oligodendrocyte precursor cell responses. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007;33:410–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sze G, DeArmond S, Brant-Zawadski M, Davis RL, Norman D, Newton TH. Foci of MRI signal (pseudo lesions) anterior to the frontal horns: histologic correlations of a normal finding. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986;7:381–387. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.2.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Leys D, Wolters EC, Ravid R, Kamphorst W. Histopathologic correlates of white matter changes on MRI in Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. Neurology. 1995;45:883–888. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.5.883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rennels ML, Blaumanis OR, Grady PA. Rapid solute transport throughout the brain via paravascular fluid pathways. Adv Neurol. 1990;52:431–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Munoz DG, Hastak SM, Harper B, Lee D, Hachinski VC. Pathologic correlates of increased signals of the centrum ovale on magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:492–497. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050044013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simpson JE, Ince PG, Higham CE, Gelsthorpe CH, Fernando MS, Matthews F, Forster G, O'Brien JT, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Brayne C, Shaw PJ, Stoeber K, Williams GH, Lewis CE, Wharton SB. MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group: Microglial activation in white matter lesions and nonlesional white matter of ageing brains. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007;33:670–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simpson JE, Fernando MS, Clark L, Ince PG, Matthews F, Forster G, O'Brien JT, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Brayne C, Shaw PJ, Lewis CE, Wharton SB. MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group: White matter lesions in an unselected cohort of the elderly: astrocytic, microglial and oligodendrocyte precursor cell responses. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007;33:410–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Awad IA, Johnson PC, Spetzler RF, Hodak JA. Incidental subcortical lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. II. Postmortem pathological correlations. Stroke. 1986;17:1090–1097. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.6.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Braffman BH, Zimmerman RA, Trojanowski JQ, Gonatas NK, Hickey WF, Schlaepfer WW. Brain MR: pathologic correlation with gross and histopathology. 2. Hyperintense white-matter foci in the elderly. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:559–566. doi: 10.2214/ajr.151.3.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berg L, McKeel DW, Jr, Miller JP, Storandt M, Rubin EH, Morris JC, Baty J, Coats M, Norton J, Goate AM, Price JL, Gearing M, Mirra SS, Saunders AM. Clinicopathologic studies in cognitively healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: relation of histologic markers to dementia severity, age, sex, and apolipoprotein E genotype. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:326–335. doi: 10.1001/archneur.55.3.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Probstfield JL, Applegate WB, Borhani NO, Curb JD, Cutler JA, Davis BR, Furberg CD, Hawkins CM, Lakatos E, Page LB, Perry HM, Schron E, Smith WM. The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP): an intervention trial on isolated systolic hypertension. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1989;11:973–989. doi: 10.3109/10641968909035386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–944. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.7.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Price JL, McKeel DW, Jr, Buckles VD, Roe CM, Xiong C, Grundman M, Hansen LA, Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Dickson DW, Smith CD, Davis DG, Schmitt FA, Markesbery WR, Kaye J, Kurlan R, Hulette C, Kurland BF, Higdon R, Kukull W, Morris JC. Neuropathology of nondemented aging: presumptive evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:1026–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathologica. 1991;82:239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mirra SS, Hart MN, Terry RD. Making the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a primer for practicing pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993;117:132–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hyman BT, Trojanowski JQ. Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:1095–1097. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199710000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Beekly DL, Ramos EM, van Belle G, Deitrich W, Clark AD, Jacka ME, Kukull WA. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;NIA-Alzheimer's Disease Centers: The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Database: an Alzheimer disease database.18:270–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Roman GC. Senile dementia of the Binswanger type, a vascular form of dementia in the elderly. JAMA. 1987;258:1782–1788. doi: 10.1001/jama.1987.03400130096040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Caplan LR. Binswanger's disease-revisited. Neurology. 1995;45:626–633. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.4.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:351–356. doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.2.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goulding JM, Signorini DF, Chatterjee S, Nicoll JA, Stewart J, Morris R, Lammie GA. Inverse relation between Braak NFT stage and cerebrovascular pathology in Alzheimer predominant dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67:654–657. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.5.654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nagy Z, Esiri MM, Jobst KA, Morris JH, King EM, McDonald B, Joachim C, Litchfield S, Barnetson L, Smith AD. The effects of additional pathology on the cognitive deficit in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:165–170. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199702000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Englund E, Brun A, Persson B. Correlations between histopathologic white matter changes and proton MR relaxation times in dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1987;1:156–170. doi: 10.1097/00002093-198701030-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Révész T, Hawkins CP, du Boulay EP, Barnard RO, McDonald WI. Pathological findings correlated with magnetic resonance imaging in subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy (Binswanger's disease). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:1337–1344. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.12.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van Swieten JC, van den Hout JH, van Ketel BA, Hijdra A, Wokke JH, van Gijn J. Periventricular lesions in the white matter on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. A morphometric correlation with arteriolosclerosis and dilated perivascular spaces. Brain. 1991;114:761–774. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.2.761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Marshall VG, Bradley WG, Jr, Marshall CE, Bhoopat T, Rhodes RH. Deep white matter infarction: correlation of MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 1988;167:517–522. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.2.3357964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fernando MS, Simpson JE, Matthews F, Brayne C, Lewis CE, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Forster G, Esteves F, Wharton SB, Shaw PJ, O'Brien JT, Ince PG. MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group: White matter lesions in an unselected cohort of the elderly: molecular pathology suggests origin from chronic hypoperfusion injury. Stroke. 2006;37:1391–1398. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221308.94473.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Auriel E, Bornstein NM, Berenyi E, Varkonyi I, Gabor M, Majtenyi K, Szepesi R, Goldberg I, Lampe R, Csiba L. Clinical, radiological and pathological correlates of leukoaraiosis. Acta Neurolo Scand. 2011;123:41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Auriel E, Csiba L, Berenyi E, Varkonyi I, Mehes G, Kardos L, Karni A, Bornstein NM. Leukoaraiosis is associated with arterial wall thickness: A quantative analysis. Neuropathology. 2012;32:227–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01262.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Young VG, Halliday GM, Kril JJ. Neuropathologic correlates of white matter hyperintensities. Neurology. 2008;71:804–811. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000319691.50117.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moody DM, Thore CR, Anstrom JA, Challa VR, Langefeld CD, Brown WR. Quantification of afferent vessels shows reduced brain vascular density in subjects with leukoaraiosis. Radiology. 2004;233:883–890. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333020981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brown WR, Moody DM, Challa VR, Thore CR, Anstrom JA. Venous collagenosis and arteriolar tortuosity in leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Sci. 2002;203-204:159–163. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00283-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Payer F, Radner H, Lechner H. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993;43:1683–1639. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.9.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brun A, Englund E. A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study. Ann Neurol. 1986;19:253–262. doi: 10.1002/ana.410190306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Munoz DG. Leukoaraiosis and ischemia: beyond the myth. Stroke. 2006;37:1348–1349. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221205.52404.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Black S, Gao FQ, Bilbao J. Understanding white matter disease. Imaging-pathological correlation in vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2009;40:48–52. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.537704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Morris JC, Gado M, Torack RM, McKeel DW., Jr. Binswanger's disease or artifact: A clinical, neuroimaging, and pathological study of periventricular white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease. Advances in Neurology. 1990;51:47–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wahlund LO, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, Bronge L, Augustin M, Sjögren M, Wallin A, Ader H, Leys D, Pantoni L, Pasquier F, Erkinjuntti T, Scheltens P. European Task Force on Age-Related White Matter Changes: A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT. Stroke. 2001;32:1318–1322. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Payer F, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Radner H, Lechner H. The morphologic correlate of incidental punctate white matter hyperintensities on MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:915–921. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chimowitz MI, Estes ML, Furlan AJ, Awad IA. Further observations on the pathology of subcortical lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:747–752. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530310095018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Udaka F, Sawada H, Kameyama M. White matter lesions and dementia: MRI pathological correlation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;977:411–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Leifer D, Buonanno FS, Richardson EP., Jr Clinicopathologic correlations of cranial magnetic resonance imaging of periventricular white matter. Neurology. 1990;40:911–918. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.6.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rossi R, Joachim C, Geroldi C, Combrinck M, Esiri MM, Smith AD, Frisoni GB. Association between subcortical vascular disease on CT and neuropathological findings. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19:690–695. doi: 10.1002/gps.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gouw AA, Seewann A, van der Flier WM, Barkhof F, Rozemuller AM, Scheltens P, Geurts JJG. Heterogeneity of small vessel disease: a systematic review of MRI and histopathology correlations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:126–135. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.204685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jagust WJ, Zheng L, Harvey DJ, Mack WJ, Vinters HV, Weiner MW, Ellis WG, Zarow C, Mungas D, Reed BR, Kramer JH, Schuff N, DeCarli C, Chui HC. Neuropathological Basis of Magnetic Resonance Images in Aging and Dementia. Ann Neurol. 2008;63:72–80. doi: 10.1002/ana.21296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Scarpelli M, Salvolini U, Diamanti L, Montironi R, Chiaromoni L, Maricotti M. MRI and pathological examination of post-mortem brains: the problem of white matter high signal areas. Neuroradiology. 1994;36:393–398. doi: 10.1007/BF00612126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Smith CD, Snowdon D, Markesbery WR. Periventricular white matter hyperintensities on MRI: correlation with neuropathologic findings. J Neuroimaging. 2000;10:13–16. doi: 10.1111/jon200010113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Burns JM, Church JA, Johnson DK, Xiong CX, Marcus D, Fotenos AF, Snyder AZ, Morris JC, Buckner RL. White matter lesions are prevalent but differently related with cognition an aging and early Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1870–1876. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.12.1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Payer F, Radner H, Lechner H. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993;43:1683–1689. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.9.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.McAleese KE, Firbank M, Hunter D, Sun L, Hall R, Neal JW, Mann DM, Esiri M, Jellinger KA, O'Brien JT, Attems J. Magnetic resonance imaging of fixed post mortem brains reliably reflects subcortical vascular pathology of frontal, parietal and occipital white matter. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013;39:485–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2012.01310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Orantes M, Wiestler OD. Vascular pathology in Alzheimer disease: Correlation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and arteriosclerosis/lipohyalinosis with cognitive decline. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:1287–1301. doi: 10.1093/jnen/62.12.1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Beach TG, Wilson JR, Sue LI, Newell A, Poston M, Cisneros R, Pandya Y, Esh C, Connor DJ, Sabbagh M, Walker DG, Roher AE. Circle of Willis atherosclerosis: Association with Alzheimer's disease, neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;113:13–21. doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0136-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Honig LS, Kukull W, Mayeux R. Atherosclerosis and AD: Analysis of data from the US National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Neurology. 2005;64:494–500. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150886.50187.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Roher AE, Esh C, Rahman A, Kokjohn TA, Beach TG. Atherosclerosis of cerebral arteries in Alzheimer disease. Stroke. 2004;35:2623–2627. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143317.70478.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zekry D, Duyckaerts C, Moulias R, Belmin J, Geoffre C, Herrmann F, Hauw JJ. Degenerative and vascular lesions of the brain have synergistic effects in dementia of the elderly. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103:481–487. doi: 10.1007/s00401-001-0493-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Aho L, Jolkkonen J, Alafuzoff I. Beta-amyloid aggregation in human brains with cerebrovascular lesions. Stroke. 2006;37:2940–2945. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000248777.44128.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Luoto TM, Haikonen S, Haapasalo H, Goebeler S, Huhtala H, Erkinjuntti T, Karhunen PJ. Large vessel cerebral atherosclerosis is not in direct association with neuropathological lesions of Alzheimer's disease. Eur Neurol. 2009;62:93–98. doi: 10.1159/000222779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tomimoto H, Akiguchi I, Suenaga T, Nishimura M, Wakita H, Nakamura S, Kimura J. Alterations of the blood-brain barrier and glial cells in white-matter lesions in cerebrovascular and Alzheimer's disease patients. Stroke. 1996;27:2069–2074. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.11.2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Haller S, Kövari E, Herrmann FR, Cuvinciuc V, Tomm AM, Zulian GB, Lovblad KO, Giannakopoulos P, Bouras C. Do brain T2/FLAIR white matter hyperintensities correspond to myelin loss in normal aging? A radiologic-neuropathologic correlation study. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1:14. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Simpson JE, Ince PG, Higham CE, Gelsthorpe CH, Fernando MS, Matthews F, Forster G, O'Brien JT, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Brayne C, Shaw PJ, Stoeber K, Williams GH, Lewis CE, Wharton SB. MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group: Microglial activation in white matter lesions and nonlesional white matter of ageing brains. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007;33:670–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.O'Sullivan M, Summers PE, Jones DK, Jarosz JM, Williams SC, Markus HS. Normal-appearing white matter in ischemic leukoaraiosis: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Neurology. 2001;57:2307–2310. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.12.2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, Anderson RL. Periventricular venous collagenosis: association with leukoaraiosis. Radiology. 1995;194:469–476. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, Ghazi-Birry HS, Reboussin DM. Cerebral microvascular alterations in aging, leukoaraiosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;826:103–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES