Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2014 Aug 1;67(2):198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.050

Genomic Predictors of Survival in Patients with High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder

Philip H Kim a,#, Eugene K Cha a,#, John P Sfakianos a, Gopa Iyer b,g, Emily C Zabor c, Sasinya N Scott d, Irina Ostrovnaya c, Ricardo Ramirez e, Arony Sun a, Ronak Shah d, Alyssa M Yee a, Victor E Reuter d,g, Dean F Bajorin b,g, Jonathan E Rosenberg b,g, Nikolaus Schultz f, Michael F Berger d,e, Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie d, David B Solit b,e,g, Bernard H Bochner a,g
PMCID: PMC4312739  NIHMSID: NIHMS618645  PMID: 25092538

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is genomically heterogeneous, with frequent alterations in genes regulating chromatin state, cell cycle control, and receptor kinase signaling. To identify prognostic genomic markers in high-grade UCB, we utilized capture-based massively-parallel sequencing to analyze 109 tumors.

Mutations were detected in 240 genes, with 23 genes mutated in ≥5% of cases. The presence of a recurrent PIK3CA mutation was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR=0.35, p=0.014) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR=0.35, p=0.040) in patients treated with radical cystectomy. In multivariable analyses controlling for pT and pN stages, PIK3CA mutation remained associated with RFS (HR=0.39, p=0.032). The most frequent alteration, TP53 mutation (57%), was more common in extravesical (69% vs. 32%, p=0.005) and lymph node-positive (77% vs. 56%, p=0.025) disease. Patients with CDKN2A altered tumors experienced worse RFS (HR=5.76, p<0.001) and CSS (HR=2.94, p=0.029) in multivariable analyses. Mutations in chromatin modifying genes were highly prevalent but not associated with outcomes.

In UCB patients treated with radical cystectomy, PIK3CA mutations are associated with favorable outcomes whereas TP53 and CDKN2A alterations are associated with poor outcomes. Genomic profiling may aid in the identification of UCB patients at highest risk following radical cystectomy.

Keywords: bladder cancer, genomics, clinical outcomes, PIK3CA, mutation


Despite multimodality treatment, patients with bladder cancer who undergo radical cystectomy (RC) remain at high risk for recurrence. We hypothesized that the significant variability in outcomes of UCB patients partly results from differences in the genetic changes mediating UCB development and progression [1-4]. With the goal of identifying prognostic genomic alterations, we utilized capture-based next-generation sequencing to analyze high-grade UCB tumors for somatic mutations in cancer-associated genes.

Tissue samples and matched germline blood from 109 patients with high-grade UCB were sequenced using MSK-IMPACT as previously described (details in Supplementary Methods) [5]. Cohort characteristics are listed in Table S1. Average sequence coverage was 579x across all targeted exons. An average of 10 mutations was detected per tumor (range 0-46). Overall, mutations were detected in 240 genes, with 23 genes mutated in ≥5% of cases (Figure 1). As validation, we re-analyzed all samples using an orthogonal sequencing platform including all coding exons of STAG2, KDM6A, ARID1A, and KMT2D (MLL2). Using this method, the vast majority of mutations in these genes identified by MSK-IMPACT were confirmed (99.3%).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Most commonly altered genes in 109 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder tumors analyzed by MSK-IMPACT. The number of patients with alterations is depicted on the right. Alterations were categorized by type, as recurrent missense mutations, novel missense mutations, truncating mutations (frameshift, nonsense and splice site), and copy number amplifications or deletions. The oncoprint shows the distribution of alterations across the sequenced samples. The top bar graph illustrates the number of MSK-IMPACT gene alterations per sample.

We analyzed mutations and copy number alterations independently and in the context of cancer-related pathways. The most common alteration was TP53 mutation, identified in 62 patients (57%) (Figure S1A). Alterations in genes that regulate entry into S phase of the cell cycle were also prevalent (46%) (Figure S1B). Consistent with previous reports, mutations in chromatin modifying genes (CMGs) were highly prevalent, occurring in 83% of patients (Figure S1C) [1-3]. KDM6A was mutated in 45 patients (41%), with 41/45 truncating mutations. ARID1A alterations (28%), similarly enriched for truncating mutations (30/31), were mutually exclusive with SMARCA4 alterations, suggesting potential overlapping functionality. The histone acetyltransferase genes CREBBP (13%) and EP300 (15%) also exhibited a pattern of mutually exclusive truncating mutations.

Alterations in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, mutationally activated in many cancers, are potential therapeutic targets in UCB [4]. We identified PI3K/AKT pathway alterations in 38 patients (35%) (Figure S2A). Recurrent missense mutations in PIK3CA, which encodes the alpha subunit of PI3-kinase, were detected in 23 patients (21%), the vast majority of which were functionally-validated activating helical domain mutations (Figure S2B). Additional recurrently mutated PI3K/AKT pathway genes included PTEN (6%), AKT1 (2%) and TSC1 (6%).

To identify prognostic genomic markers, we analyzed associations between alteration status, clinicopathologic characteristics, and outcomes in 89 patients whose tumors were obtained at RC. For these analyses, we included 22 alterations (Table S2) with putative functional significance (oncogenes: recurrent missense mutations and amplifications; tumor suppressors: nonsense mutations, frameshift indels, and deletions). TP53 mutations were more associated common in extravesical than organ-confined disease (69% vs. 32%, p=0.005) and p53 pathway alterations were more common in node-positive disease (77% vs. 56%, p=0.025) (Table S2).

The presence of a recurrent missense mutation in PIK3CA was associated with significantly improved RFS and CSS (p=0.014 and 0.040, respectively) (Figure 2A). A similar improvement was observed upon analyzing PI3K/AKT pathway genes as a functionally related group (HR=0.34, p=0.006 and HR=0.29, p=0.01; Figure 2B). Furthermore, after controlling for pT stage and nodal involvement, PIK3CA mutation and PI3K/AKT pathway alteration remained significant predictors of improved RFS (HR=0.39, p=0.032 and HR=0.37, p=0.017, respectively; Table S3). Notably, PIK3CA alterations have been associated with favorable disease-specific outcomes in other malignancies [6, 7]. Although relatively favorable, UCB patients with PIK3CA mutant tumors still experienced a significant rate of disease recurrence (44% at 5 years). Adjuvant trials of selective PI3-kinase inhibitors in this genetically defined subset of patients would thus be rational.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Associations with PI3K/AKT pathway alterations and clinical outcomes in 89 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder patients treated with radical cystectomy. Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival stratified by (A) PIK3CA mutation status and (B) PI3K/AKT pathway alteration status. P values reflect log-rank test.

Patients with p53 pathway alterations had worse RFS (HR=1.92, p=0.048) and CSS (HR=2.94, p=0.013), but these did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for pT and pN stages (Table S3). Patients with CDKN2A alterations experienced worse RFS and CSS in multivariable analyses (HR=5.76, p<0.001 and HR=2.94, p=0.029, respectively). The significantly poor outcome of patients with CDKN2A altered tumors provides rationale for the study of selective cdk4 inhibitors in this genomic subgroup.

We identified higher CMG mutation rates than previously reported [1]. Methodological differences may account for this, as our deep sequencing approach (mean coverage 579x) likely provided greater sensitivity. However, we did not find an association between CMG mutations and outcomes. Given their presence in nearly all UCB tumors (83% in this series), we speculate that epigenetic alterations may be necessary events in UCB pathogenesis and thus CMG mutations are not associated with outcomes.

Studies investigating the prognostic significance of alterations in the cohesin subunit STAG2, which regulates sister chromatid cohesion and segregation, in UCB have reported contradictory findings. In one study, STAG2 alterations were associated with worse survival [2], while another found that loss of STAG2 expression was associated with worse disease characteristics and outcomes following RC [8]. In contrast, a third study reported that loss of STAG2 expression was associated with improved outcomes [9]. In our study, we observed no association between STAG2 mutations and outcomes.

Given the genomic heterogeneity of bladder cancer, one limitation of the current study is its sample size. We may have also underestimated the genetic variation present within individual tumors by sampling a single site. Further, although our assay included all highly mutated genes identified by recent whole exome studies, less frequently mutated genes and structural alterations were not detectable with our capture-based approach. Finally, our targeted DNA sequencing approach does not address epigenetic differences and/or differences in gene expression [10]. Given these limitations of the current study, a larger and more comprehensive analysis may identify co-mutation patterns that are more predictive of disease outcome.

In summary, we performed capture-based, next-generation sequencing on a large cohort of high-grade UCB patients with the goal of identifying prognostic genomic alterations. Patients with TP53 mutant tumors experienced worse outcomes, but TP53 mutations were not significantly associated with outcome in multivariable analyses given their association with locally advanced and/or node-positive disease. In contrast, PIK3CA and/or PI3K/AKT pathway alterations were associated with improved disease-specific outcomes independent of tumor and lymph node stage whereas CDKN2A alterations were independently associated with worse outcomes. These findings, pending validation, may inform patient selection for novel combined modality approaches.

Supplementary Material

01
02
03
04
05
06
07

Take Home Message.

Using next-generation sequencing, we identified genomic subsets of high-grade urothelial bladder cancer associated with favorable (PIK3CA mutant) and unfavorable (CDKN2A altered) outcomes. These findings may aid in the selection of patients most likely to benefit from novel combined modality approaches.

Acknowledgments

Financial support: This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Michael and Zena Wiener for Therapeutics Program in Bladder Cancer, Cycle for Survival, and Pin Down Bladder Cancer.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Gui Y, Guo G, Huang Y, Hu X, Tang A, Gao S, et al. Frequent mutations of chromatin remodeling genes in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Nat Genet. 2011;43:875–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Guo G, Sun X, Chen C, Wu S, Huang P, Li Z, et al. Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing of bladder cancer identifies frequent alterations in genes involved in sister chromatid cohesion and segregation. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1459–63. doi: 10.1038/ng.2798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507:315–22. doi: 10.1038/nature12965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Iyer G, Al-Ahmadie H, Schultz N, Hanrahan AJ, Ostrovnaya I, Balar AV, et al. Prevalence and co-occurrence of actionable genomic alterations in high-grade bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3133–40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.5740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Wagle N, Berger MF, Davis MJ, Blumenstiel B, Defelice M, Pochanard P, et al. High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:82–93. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Kalinsky K, Jacks LM, Heguy A, Patil S, Drobnjak M, Bhanot UK, et al. PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5049–59. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Shigaki H, Baba Y, Watanabe M, Murata A, Ishimoto T, Iwatsuki M, et al. PIK3CA mutation is associated with a favorable prognosis among patients with curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2451–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Solomon DA, Kim JS, Bondaruk J, Shariat SF, Wang ZF, Elkahloun AG, et al. Frequent truncating mutations of STAG2 in bladder cancer. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1428–30. doi: 10.1038/ng.2800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Balbas-Martinez C, Sagrera A, Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau E, Earl J, Marquez M, Vazquez M, et al. Recurrent inactivation of STAG2 in bladder cancer is not associated with aneuploidy. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1464–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.2799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Sjodahl G, Lauss M, Lovgren K, Chebil G, Gudjonsson S, Veerla S, et al. A molecular taxonomy for urothelial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3377–86. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0077-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02
03
04
05
06
07

RESOURCES