LETTER
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) demonstrate a wide range of carbapenem susceptibility, and while most isolates are nonsusceptible to carbapenems, some isolates, especially Escherichia coli, may test susceptible to them (1, 2). Day et al. recently reported the utility of using disks of faropenem, an oral penem, in the screening of CPE (3). The authors demonstrated that disks containing up to 10 μg faropenem had 99% sensitivity and 94% specificity when tested against 166 CPE isolates producing various carbapenemases and 82 isolates producing other β-lactamases.
In the United States and several other countries, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) is by far the most common carbapenemase found in Enterobacteriaceae (4). In this study, we tested the ability of faropenem disks as well as carbapenem disks to predict KPC production using 62 unique KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates, including K. pneumoniae (n = 31), Escherichia coli (n = 20), and Enterobacter spp. (n = 11). The presence of the KPC gene was confirmed by PCR. Seventy-three isolates producing extended-spectrum or AmpC β-lactamases were used as controls (5, 6). Only one isolate was included from a given patient. The disk diffusion testing was performed with ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem (disks obtained from BD, Sparks, MD), tebipenem, and faropenem (disks obtained from Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan) using the standard methodology endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Tebipenem is an oral carbapenem which is approved for clinical use in Japan. All disks contained 10 μg of the agent, except the faropenem disks, which contained 5 μg of the agent.
The ranges of zone diameters for faropenem and the four carbapenems against KPC-positive or -negative Enterobacteriaceae are shown in Table 1. All 62 KPC-positive Enterobacteriaceae showed confluent growth up to the edge of the 5-μg faropenem disk, to generate a zone diameter of 6 mm. In contrast, none of the KPC-negative isolates showed growth up to the edge of faropenem disks, with all zone diameters of faropenem being greater than or equal to 10 mm. The data show that a zone diameter of 6 mm (i.e., no inhibition) for faropenem predicted a KPC producer with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the set of isolates studied. The other four carbapenems generated zone diameters of 6 to 22 mm and 14 to 32 mm for KPC-positive and KPC-negative Enterobacteriaceae, respectively.
TABLE 1.
Isolate type and organism(s) (no. of isolates [n = 135]) | Median (range of) inhibition zone diam (mm) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imipenem | Meropenem | Ertapenem | Tebipenem | Faropenem | |
KPC positive | |||||
E. coli (20) | 16 (12–20) | 15 (10–21) | 13 (6–20) | 16 (8–22) | 6 (6) |
K. pneumoniae (31) | 11 (6–22) | 9 (6–20) | 8 (6–16) | 10 (6–21) | 6 (6) |
Enterobacter spp. (11) | 15 (7–23) | 14 (7–20) | 12 (6–17) | 16 (7–22) | 6 (6) |
KPC negative | |||||
E. coli (23) | 26 (22–30) | 26 (25–30) | 26 (22–30) | 28 (26–32) | 19 (10–24) |
K. pneumoniae (36) | 26 (23–30) | 26 (19–30) | 26 (13–28) | 28 (20–30) | 19 (12–23) |
Enterobacter spp. (14) | 23 (19–25) | 25.5 (16–28) | 24.5 (14–28) | 27 (19–29) | 16.5 (10–22) |
Our data confirm the potential utility of faropenem disks in predicting the KPC production reported by Day et al. and extend their findings to a large set of KPC-producing isolates, including K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and Enterobacter spp. Unlike in the aforementioned study, we did not observe any false-positive tests among either extended-spectrum β-lactamase- or AmpC β-lactamase-producing isolates, though this may be due to the overall smaller number of isolates investigated in our study. Faropenem is not currently approved for clinical use in the United States, but it may have a diagnostic role in sensitive prediction of KPC production among Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported in part by a research grant from the National Institutes of Health (R21AI107302).
Footnotes
Ed. Note: The author of the published article did not feel that a response was necessary.
REFERENCES
- 1.Nordmann P, Gniadkowski M, Giske CG, Poirel L, Woodford N, Miriagou V, European Network on Carbapenemases 2012. Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18:432–438. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03815.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim YA, Qureshi ZA, Adams-Haduch JM, Park YS, Shutt KA, Doi Y. 2012. Features of infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli: emergence of sequence type 131. Clin. Infect. Dis. 55:224-231. 10.1093/cid/cis387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Day KM, Pike R, Winstanley TG, Lanyon C, Cummings SP, Raza MW, Woodford N, Perry JD. 2013. Use of faropenem as an indicator of carbapenemase activity in the Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:1881–1886. 10.1128/JCM.00720-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Queenan AM, Bush K. 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20:440–458. 10.1128/CMR.00001-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Park YS, Adams-Haduch JM, Shutt KA, Yarabinec DM, III, Johnson LE, Hingwe A, Lewis JS, II, Jorgensen JH, Doi Y. 2012. Clinical and microbiologic characteristics of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli at three centers in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:1870-1876. 10.1128/AAC.05650-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qureshi ZA, Paterson DL, Peleg AY, Adams-Haduch JM, Shutt KA, Pakstis DL, Sordillo E, Polsky B, Sandkovsky G, Bhussar MK, Doi Y. 2012. Clinical characteristics of bacteraemia caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the era of CTX-M-type and KPC-type β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18:887–893. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03658.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]