Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2014 Dec;52(12):4202–4209. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01105-14

Whole-Genome Comparison of Aspergillus fumigatus Strains Serially Isolated from Patients with Aspergillosis

Daisuke Hagiwara a,, Hiroki Takahashi a, Akira Watanabe a,b, Azusa Takahashi-Nakaguchi a, Susumu Kawamoto a, Katsuhiko Kamei a,b, Tohru Gonoi a
Editor: G A Land
PMCID: PMC4313286  PMID: 25232160

Abstract

The emergence of azole-resistant strains of Aspergillus fumigatus during treatment for aspergillosis occurs by a mutation selection process. Understanding how antifungal resistance mechanisms evolve in the host environment during infection is of great clinical importance and biological interest. Here, we used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify mutations that arose during infection by A. fumigatus strains sequentially isolated from two patients, one with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) (five isolations) and the other with aspergilloma (three isolations). The serial isolates had identical microsatellite types, but their growth rates and conidia production levels were dissimilar. A whole-genome comparison showed that three of the five isolates from the IPA patient carried a mutation, while 22 mutations, including six nonsynonymous ones, were found among three isolates from the aspergilloma patient. One aspergilloma isolate carried the cyp51A mutation P216L, which is reported to confer azole resistance, and it displayed an MIC indicating resistance to itraconazole. This isolate harbored five other nonsynonymous mutations, some of which were found in the afyap1 and aldA genes. We further identified a large deletion in the aspergilloma isolate in a region containing 11 genes. This finding suggested the possibility that genomic deletions can occur during chronic infection with A. fumigatus. Overall, our results revealed dynamic alterations that occur in the A. fumigatus genome within its host during infection and treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Aspergillus fumigatus is a major pathogen responsible for aspergillosis, a disease that causes invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), pulmonary aspergilloma, and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. This fungus usually infects only immunocompromised patients, in whom it has a relatively high mortality rate when causing IPA (1, 2). The treatment of aspergillosis has proven difficult because of limited antifungal therapy possibilities and the prevalence of antifungal-resistant strains worldwide. Consequently, the number of cases for which treatment has failed is increasing (3, 4). Recent studies from several research groups show that prolonged azole therapy tends to promote the occurrence of azole-resistant strains (5, 6). However, long-term antifungal therapy is indispensable for the treatment of chronic aspergillosis. A further understanding of how antifungal-resistant mechanisms evolve in the host environment during infection or colonization is therefore of great clinical importance and biological interest.

Azole drugs are often used as a first-line therapy for aspergillosis (7). Itraconazole (ITCZ) can treat chronic aspergillosis infections, such as aspergilloma, whereas voriconazole (VRCZ) is used to treat invasive aspergillosis. Since first being reported in 1997, a number of azole-resistant strains have been isolated primarily from aspergilloma patients on prolonged azole therapy (4, 810). Fungal tolerance is frequently caused by mutations in the gene encoding the target protein of azoles (cyp51A). Several mutations in cyp51A have been found in azole-resistant strains, and amino acid substitutions in the Cyp51A protein, including G54A, G54W, P216L, M220V/K/T, and G448S, have been shown to cause azole tolerance in genetic reconstitution experiments (5, 11, 12).

Generally, most mutations causing azole resistance are thought to have been generated during infection in an azole-treated host (3, 5, 6). In some cases in which the strains are serially isolated from a single patient undergoing azole treatment, the first cultured isolates show azole sensitivity and carry no cyp51A mutations, whereas subsequent isolates are azole resistant and possess cyp51A mutations (3, 5, 6, 13). Although it is not clear whether the host environment itself promotes genetic mutations, azole treatment appears to be a selective factor for cyp51A mutants.

In recent years, several genotyping methods, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and microsatellite analysis of short tandem repeats (STRs), have been developed for the genetic discrimination of clinical and environmental A. fumigatus strains (14, 15). Intensive genotyping studies have shown that clinical isolates recovered from a single patient with aspergilloma sometimes contain different genotypes (6, 16, 17). In a recent study by Howard et al. (18), strains recovered from surgically removed fungal balls that consisted of masses of mycelia and resided in the lungs of aspergilloma patients were used for genetic typing. Microsatellite variation, the coexistence of strains with different genotypes, and different azole susceptibilities were found among the strains from the same fungal ball. This clearly shows that a mature fungal ball consists of genotypically and/or phenotypically distinct strains, which have evolved during persistence in the host lung.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming increasingly affordable. It enables a whole-genome sequence (WGS)-based comparison to be performed between clinical isolates, thus providing high-resolution typing. Using this method, Camps et al. (19) uncovered that a novel mutation in the hapE gene encoding a CCAAT-binding transcription factor complex subunit had occurred during infection and was responsible for azole resistance. This study highlighted the potential for NGS to reveal unknown mechanisms for azole resistance.

In the present study, sequential isolations of A. fumigatus from one patient with IPA and another with aspergilloma were subjected to WGS analysis in order to better understand the genomic dynamics of this pathogen during infection and treatment. The WGS comparison revealed several punctual mutations and a large-segment deletion among different strains. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of genomic rearrangement during infection in pathogens responsible for causing aspergillosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains.

The A. fumigatus clinical strains analyzed here were isolated at Chiba University Hospital, Japan. Five isolates were collected from patient I, who had IPA, on different days (21 and 24 July 2009). From patient II with aspergilloma, three isolates were collected on different days (9 November 2009 and 10 March 2011) (Table 1). The isolates were morphologically, physiologically, and genetically identified as A. fumigatus and were maintained by the Medical Mycology Research Center (MMRC) of Chiba University. For distinction, the isolates obtained on the same day were named as follows: IFM 59355-1 and IFM 59355-2; IFM 59356-1, IFM 59356-2, and IFM 59356-3; and IFM59361-1 and IFM 59361-2. After the present study, we renamed the strains IFM 62541 (for IFM 59355-1), IFM 62542 (for IFM 59355-2), IFM 62543 (for IFM 59356-1), IFM 62544 (for IFM 59356-2), IFM 62545 (for IFM 59356-3), IFM 62546 (for IFM 59361-1), and IFM 62547 (for IFM 59361-2). All isolates were preserved at the MMRC.

TABLE 1.

Isolates used in this study

Isolate by patient Date of isolation (day/mo/yr) No. of tandem repeats at microsatellite site
2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C
I (IPA)
    IFM 59355-1 21/07/2009 20 16 14 8 17 23 5 11 10
    IFM 59355-2 21/07/2009 20 16 14 8 17 23 5 11 10
    IFM 59356-1 24/07/2009 20 16 14 8 17 23 5 11 10
    IFM 59356-2 24/07/2009 20 16 14 8 17 23 5 11 10
    IFM 59356-3 24/07/2009 20 16 14 8 17 23 5 11 10
II (aspergilloma)
    IFM 59361-1 09/11/2009 24 19 14 50 14 29 10 7 9
    IFM 59361-2 09/11/2009 24 19 14 50 14 29 10 7 9
    IFM 60237 10/03/2011 24 19 14 51 14 29 10 7 9

IFM 59355-1, IFM 59355-2, IFM 59356-1, IFM 59356-2, and IFM 59356-3 were isolated from a patient with IPA, as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria (patient I) (20). IFM 59361-1, IFM 59361-2, and IFM 60237 were isolated from a patient radiologically diagnosed with aspergilloma in 2007 (patient II), as defined by the criteria suggested by Denning (21) (Table 1). IFM 60237 was isolated 16 months after the other two strains. All isolates were obtained by culturing patient sputum samples.

Patient I was treated with voriconazole after the isolation of the strains studied here (around 24 July 2009); therefore, the isolates from this patient were not exposed to azole drugs preisolation. Patient II was treated with voriconazole (VRCZ) (400 mg daily) in December 2009 (1 month after the first isolation of A. fumigatus), but the treatment was discontinued after 5 days because of a side effect. Three days later, itraconazole (ITCZ) treatment was started (200 mg daily) and lasted for 20 months.

Microsatellite genotyping.

Nine microsatellite regions of approximately 400 bp were PCR amplified using appropriately designed primer pairs (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) and sequenced using Sanger sequencing (14). The sequences of the primers are shown in Table S1. The repeat numbers of each locus were counted from the sequences.

Growth and conidiation tests.

First, conidia from each isolate were obtained from the MMRC stock center (as lyophilized conidia). To prepare fresh conidial suspensions, well-segregated conidia were inoculated onto a potato dextrose agar (PDA) slant and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. An appropriate volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) was added and vortexed gently to obtain conidial suspensions. To eliminate hyphae, the conidial suspension was passed through a cell strainer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). To test for colony growth, 104 conidia of each strain were point inoculated onto glucose minimal medium (GMM) (22) or PDA plates, which were incubated at 37°C for 66 h or 48 h, respectively.

A calculation of the number of conidia obtained was performed as described previously (23). Briefly, conidia on PDA (104 conidia/ml, 3 ml per well) were incubated at 37°C in 6-well plates. After 48 h of incubation, the agar from each well containing the conidia (including mycelia) was vortexed in 10 ml of PBST. The numbers of conidia in the suspensions were counted using a hemocytometer. The data were obtained in triplicate, and the mean values ± standard deviations (SD) were reported.

Whole-genome sequencing.

Genomic DNA was prepared from overnight cultured mycelia using the DNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The preparation of a fragmented genomic DNA library was performed using a Nextera DNA sample preparation kit, according to the manufacturer's protocols (Illumina, San Diego, CA). We prepared the DNA libraries for each strain in our laboratory. The mean length of the libraries ranged from 400 to 1,500 bp (see Tables S2 and S3 in the supplemental material). Sequencing was conducted in a paired-end 2 × 150 bp mode on a MiSeq system, according to the manufacturer's protocols (Illumina).

Sequence analysis.

The Illumina data sets were trimmed using fastq-mcf in ea-utils (version 1.1.2-484), i.e., sequencing adapters and sequences with low quality scores (Phred score [Q], <30) were removed (24). The data sets were mapped to the genome sequence of the A. fumigatus genome reference strain Af293 (29,420,142 bp, genome version s03-m04-r03) (25, 26) using Bowtie 2 (version 2.0.0-beta7) with the very sensitive option in end-to-end mode (27). Duplicated reads were removed using Picard (version 1.112) (http://picard.sourceforge.net). The programs mpileup and bcftools from SAMtools (version 0.1.19-44428cd) were used to perform further quality controls. In mpileup, the -q20 argument was used to trim reads with low-quality mapping, whereas the argument -q30 was used to trim low-quality bases at the 3′ end (28). The bcftools setting was set to -c in order to call variants using Bayesian inference. Consensus and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were excluded if they did not meet a minimum coverage of 5× or if the variant was present in <90% of the base calls (29, 30). The genotype field in the variant call format (VCF) files indicates homozygote and heterozygote probabilities as Phred-scaled likelihoods. SNPs were excluded if they were called as heterozygous genotypes using SAMtools. The mapping results were visualized in the Integrative Genomics Viewer (version 2.3.3) (31, 32). The reference genome data included information on open reading frames and annotations, from which the SNPs were designated nonsynonymous or synonymous.

Single nucleotide mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Regions of approximately 400 bp that contained a mutation were amplified with appropriately designed primer pairs and then sequenced. The primer sequences are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material, which were named as follows. For verification of the SNPs in strains from patient I or patient II, PaI or PaII was added to the primer name, respectively. For nonsynonymous SNPs, synonymous SNPs, or SNPs in a noncoding region, “(NS),” “(Syno),” or “(NonC)” was added to the primer name, respectively.

Analysis of unmapped reads.

De novo assembly of the unmapped reads was conducted using the Newbler assembler 2.9 (Roche), with default parameters. The contigs were selected based on size/depth criteria: those of <500 bp and/or with a depth of <30× coverage were removed. To investigate whether unique genome sequences were present in strains isolated from the same patient, the unmapped reads of each strain were mapped to the contigs generated from all the strains in the same patient by the Bowtie 2 software. The coverage of the mapped regions was then evaluated. Gene predictions were performed using the gene prediction tool AUGUSTUS (version 2.5.5), with a training set of A. fumigatus (33). The parameters of AUGUSTUS were -species = aspergillus_fumigatus, -strand = both, -genemodel = partial, -singlestrand = false, -protein = on, -introns = on, -start = on, -stop = on, -cds = on, and -gff3 = on. To compare all the predicted genes with Aspergillus genes, consisting of 244,811 genes available on AspGD (34), a reciprocal BLAST best hit approach was performed by BLASTp (35), with an E value of 1.0e−4. All BLASTp results were filtered based on a BLASTp identity of ≥80% and an aligned length coverage of ≥80%.

Antifungal susceptibility testing.

Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed as described previously (36). Briefly, tests were performed in triplicate using amphotericin B (AMPH-B), 5-flucytosine (5-FC), fluconazole (FLCZ), ITCZ, VRCZ, miconazole (MCZ), and micafungin (MCFG) in RPMI 1640 medium (pH 7.0) at 35°C, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method, document M38-A2 (37), with partial modifications using the dried plate for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts method (Eiken Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan).

Accession number.

The sequenced genome data were deposited with the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive under accession no. DRA002475.

RESULTS

Microsatellite analysis of the isolates from patients I and II.

To determine whether the isolates from each patient were genotypically identical, we calculated the number of STRs in the microsatellites, as described in a report by de Valk et al. (14). The five isolates from patient I showed identical repeat numbers at all loci, indicating an identical genotype. In the three isolates from patient II, however, IFM 60237 had a different repeat number for locus 3A, whereas the other loci were the same as those of IFM 59361-1 and IFM 59361-2. Because the locus 3A difference amounted to only one repeat, we concluded that the strains were originally identical.

Phenotypic analysis of the isolates.

Of the five isolates from patient I, IFM 59355-2 and IFM 59356-3 had retarded growth on GMM and relatively white colonies on GMM and PDA plates. Furthermore, the surface patterns of the isolates on GMM differed from each other (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the growth of the isolates from patient II on GMM was almost completely impaired. On PDA, IFM 59361-2 produced a white colony, whereas the other two strains each produced a greenish colony (Fig. 1B).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Comparison of colonial growth among the isolates. The conidia (104) of the isolates from patient I (A) or patient II (B) were point inoculated onto glucose minimal medium (GMM) or potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and then incubated at 37°C for 66 h or 48 h, respectively.

Of the isolates from patient I, IFM 59355-2 and IFM 59356-3 showed a 70 to 80% reduction in conidia production compared with that of the other isolates (Fig. 2A). Of the isolates from patient II, conidia production in IFM 59361-2 decreased to 1% of that in IFM 59361-1, whereas IFM 60237 showed a 27% decrease compared with that of IFM 59361-1 (Fig. 2B). Collectively, these strains exhibited different phenotypes from each other despite originally being from an identical set from each patient.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Comparison of conidia numbers among the isolates. Three milliliters of PDA containing 3 × 104 conidia was incubated at 37°C in each well of a 6-well plate. After 48 h, the agar was vigorously vortexed in 10 ml of PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. The conidia numbers were counted using a hemocytometer. The data were obtained in triplicate, and mean values ± SD are shown.

Whole-genome sequence comparisons.

To gain insight into the phenotypic differences among the strains isolated from patients I and II, a WGS-based comparison was conducted using NGS. For five strains from patient I, the mapped sequences of IFM 59355-1, IFM 59355-2, IFM 59356-1, IFM 59356-2, and IFM 59356-3 were 27,086,733, 27,086,107, 27,106,829, 26,501,391, and 26,925,829 bp, respectively. Similarly, for three strains from patient II, the mapped sequences of IFM 59361-1, IFM 59361-2, and IFM 60237 were 27,206,287, 27,205,914, and 26,803,686 bp, respectively. The rates of the mapped region in the reference genome (Af293, 29.4 Mb) ranged from 90.1 to 92.5%, and the total coverages of the mapping ranged from 15.0 to 45.8× (see Tables S2 and S3 in the supplemental material).

Among the regions mapped by all five strains from patient I or all three strains from patient II, four or 22 loci were estimated to be an SNP, respectively. These candidate loci were confirmed by Sanger sequencing, although one of the loci found in the patient I strain set was a false call. The other three SNPs from the patient I strains were valid and identified as nonsynonymous (Table 2). IFM 59355-2 has a nonsense mutation in the veA gene at Q400, while IFM 59355-1 and IFM 59356-2 have a substitution in Afu2g08040 (Y958C) and Afu8g06170 (T260N), respectively. No SNPs were detected in the IFM 59356-1 or IFM 59356-3 genomes.

TABLE 2.

Mutations detected in isolates from patient I

Gene Amino acid length Description Amino acid substitution
IFM 59355-1 IFM 59355-2 IFM 59356-1 IFM 59356-2 IFM 59356-3
Afu1g12490 570 Sexual development regulator (veA) Gln 400a
Afu2g08040 1,148 C6 finger domain protein, putative Tyr 958 Cys
Afu8g06170 270 Hypothetical protein Thr 260 Asn
a

Nonsense substitution.

Among the strains from patient II, 22 SNPs were identified, of which six were nonsynonymous (Table 3, E478K in Afu2g15890, P216L in cyp51A, F487L in afyap1, G357S in aldA, Q1047 in Afu7g04400, and T397N in Afu8g07080). Notably, all of these SNPs were found in IFM 60237, which was isolated 16 months after the other two strains. Moreover, one synonymous SNP was identified in the Afu7g05660 locus of IFM 60237 (Table 3). The other 15 SNPs were located in noncoding regions, such as untranslated regions, introns, and intergenic regions (Table 4). The locations of these SNPs were not limited in IFM 60237, which was in contrast to the case of the nonsynonymous SNPs, and it suggested that the noncoding regions may be more variable.

TABLE 3.

Nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations detected in isolates from patient II

Gene Amino acid length Description Amino acid substitution
IFM 59361-1 IFM 59361-2 IFM 60237
Afu2g15890 772 RING finger protein, putative Glu 478 Lys
Afu4g06890 515 14-Alpha sterol demethylase (cyp51A) Pro 216 Leu
Afu6g09930 615 bZip family transcription factor (afyap1) Phe 487 Leu
Afu6g11430 559 Putative aldehyde dehydrogenase (aldA) Gly 357 Ser
Afu7g04400 1,220 Hypothetical protein Gln 1047a
Afu7g05660 1,065 Hypothetical protein Thr 1018 Thr
Afu8g07080 634 Putative secreted metalloprotease Thr 397 Asn
a

Nonsense substitution.

TABLE 4.

Mutations detected in noncoding regions of isolates from patient II

Chromosome Position Region Related gene or proximal gene Nucleotide substitution in isolate:
Reference nucleotide
IFM 59361-1 IFM 59361-2 IFM 60237
1 3052529 5′ UTRa Afu1g11560 G G b A
3288510 5′ UTR Afu1g12480 T G
2 4499618 3′ UTR Afu2g16840 T G
3 545649 Intergenic C G
1446159 Intron Afu3g05900 T G
4 1137864 5′ UTR Afu4g04060 T C
1682647 Intergenic T T T
2221124 Intergenic C G
2625031 Intergenic A G
5 489586 3′ UTR Afu5g01920 T C
1779941 Intergenic A A C
3582922 Intergenic T T C
6 1473248 5′ UTR Afu6g06740 C C T
2286061 Intergenic A A C
8 928033 Intergenic T C
a

UTR, untranslated region.

b

—, nucleotide identical to the reference.

Because we used the Af293 genome sequence as a reference for mapping analysis, it is conceivable that we missed genomic regions unique to the strains. Therefore, to explore these unique regions from each patient, we assembled the unmapped reads to construct contigs for the strains from each patient. A total of 205 and 474 contigs were generated, with total lengths of 767,194 and 1,552,135 bp for patients I and II, respectively (Table 5). We next used the gene prediction tool AUGUSTUS to identify the coding sequences from each contig. A total of 163 and 396 genes were predicted from each of the strains from patients I or II, respectively (Table 5). We then compared the gene contents of the unique regions between strains from the same patient, revealing no differences in the unmapped regions. Although we could not determine differences at the SNP level in the unique regions because of technical difficulties, these results suggest that those genomic regions absent from the Af293 strain might possess a similar structure in strains isolated from the same patient.

TABLE 5.

Summary of de novo assembly of unmapped reads

Assembly parameter Patient I (5 strains) Patient II (3 strains)
No. of contigs (length ≥ 500, depth ≥ 30) 205 474
Total length (bp) 767,194 1,552,135
N50 (bp) 11,069 7,531
Avg length (bp) 3,742 3,274
No. of predicted genes 163 396

To compare the gene contents in regions common to the Af293 strain, we explored draft genome sequences. By searching for the loss of coding regions among the strains from each patient, we found that a region of approximately 38.5 kb containing 11 genes was missing in the IFM 60237 genome compared with the IFM 59361-1 and IFM 59361-2 genomes from patient II (Table 6); no large-scale deletion was found among the strains from patient I. Collectively, we identified several genetic differences (SNPs and a large-scale deletion) among the serially isolated strains using a WGS comparison, although no mutations that might affect phenotypes were identified in the IFM 59356-1 and IFM 59356-3 genomes.

TABLE 6.

List of genes absent in the IFM 60237 genome

Gene Description Presence/absence in isolate:
IFM 59361-1 IFM 59361-2 IFM 60237
Afu7g06780 Hypothetical protein Present Present a
Afu7g06790 Putative allantoate permease of the major facilitator superfamily Present Present
Afu7g06800 Glutamyl-tRNA (Gln) amidotransferase, subunit A Present Present
Afu7g06810 l-Amino acid oxidase LaoA, putative Present Present
Afu7g06820 Hypothetical protein Present Present
Afu7g06825 rRNA Present Present
Afu7g06830 Hypothetical protein Present Present
Afu7g06840 Putative class III aminotransferase Present Present
Afu7g06850 Phosphoserine phosphatase, putative Present Present
Afu7g06890 Peroxidase, putative Present Present
Afu7g06900 Putative branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase protein Present Present
a

−, absent.

Acquired tolerance to ITCZ in a strain from an aspergilloma patient.

WGS comparisons revealed that IFM 60237 carried a cyp51A mutation compared with the genomes of the other two strains. This substitution (P216L) was previously shown to confer ITCZ resistance; therefore, we assumed that IFM 60237 was resistant to some azole drugs (5). The antimicrobial susceptibilities of the strains from both patients were determined by testing with MCFG, AMPH-B, and 5-FC, as well as the azole drugs FLCZ, ITCZ, VRCZ, and MCZ (Table 7). As expected, IFM 60237 had an MIC indicative of an ITCZ-resistant phenotype (4 mg/liter). The ITCZ MICs of the other strains showed an ITCZ-susceptible phenotype, which is consistent with the absence of the cyp51A P216L substitution. The susceptibilities to other drugs were similar between each set of strains.

TABLE 7.

MICs for the A. fumigatus isolates used in this study

Isolate by patient MEC for MCFG (mg/liter)b MIC for (mg/liter)c:
AMPH-B 5-FC FLCZ ITCZ VRCZ MCZ
I (IPA)a
    IFM 59355-1 0.03 2 16 >64 0.5 1 2
    IFM 59355-2 0.03 2 32 >64 0.5 0.5 2
    IFM 59356-1 0.03 2 2 16 0.5 0.5 1
    IFM 59356-2 0.03 1 32 >64 0.5 0.5 2
    IFM 59356-3 0.03 2 4 >64 1 0.5 1
II (aspergilloma)
    IFM 59361-1 0.03 1 4 8 1 1 1
    IFM 59361-2 0.03 1 8 >64 1 2 2
    IFM 60237 ≤0.015 2 8 64 4 1 0.5
a

IPA, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

b

MCFG, micafungin; MEC, minimum effective concentration.

c

AMPH-B, amphotericin B; 5-FC, 5-flucytosine; FLCZ, fluconazole; ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; MCZ, miconazole.

VRCZ and ITCZ had been used to treat patient II for aspergilloma (Fig. 3). Before isolation, IFM 60237 had been exposed to 5 days of VRCZ and 449 days of ITCZ. This duration of drug exposure might have led to the development of drug resistance, namely, that conferred by cyp51A P216L. Patient I had never been treated with azoles before the strains were isolated.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Treatment schedule for patient II. The drug treatments are indicated by bars. The corresponding fungal isolation dates are shown. In this patient, a fungal ball was observed radiologically in 2007; therefore, the causal infection supposedly occurred before this date. The dates are shown in day/month/year format. d, days.

DISCUSSION

We analyzed three strains serially isolated from an aspergilloma patient (patient II) to compare their draft genome sequences and phenotypes. While the strains originally contained identical microsatellites (although IFM 60237 exhibited microevolution), their conidia production levels on PDA plates differed markedly from each other (Fig. 1 and 2). Because genetic differences, such as nonsynonymous mutations and deletions among these strains, were only found in the IFM 60237 genome, the reason for the marked decrease in conidiation in IFM 59361-2 is unknown.

One possible explanation is that we investigated only SNPs in regions that mapped with at least five reads. For example, a 26.8- to 27.2-Mb region corresponded to 91.1 to 92.5% of the reference genome (29.4 Mb); therefore, if the strains have genomes comparable in size to that of Af293, this would leave a 2.2- to 2.6-Mb region uninvestigated. In fact, compared with Af293, another sequenced A. fumigatus strain, A1163, has up to 2% unique genes in its genome (38), which might explain the phenotypic differences. To test this possibility, we constructed and explored the unique regions absent from the Af293 genome in patients I and II, predicting 163 and 396 genes corresponding to 1.7% and 4.0% of the Af293 genome, respectively. Nonetheless, the gene contents in these regions were identical among the strains of each patient. Another possible explanation is that mutations in noncoding regions might be responsible for the phenotypic differences. Although such mutations will not affect a protein sequence directly, the rates of transcription, mRNA processing, and translation might be influenced. We identified 15 SNPs in noncoding regions in IFM 59361-1, IFM 59361-2, and IFM 60237 (Table 4). However, the specific effects of these SNPs on the phenotypes are yet to be investigated.

IFM 60237 was recovered 16 months after the isolation of IFM 59361-1 and IFM 59361-2 from patient II and was shown to carry a mutation in cyp51A known to be involved in azole resistance (5). This isolate subsequently showed a high ITCZ MIC, revealing its resistance to ITCZ. This is likely to have been caused by the 16-month exposure to azole treatment inside the host, which is consistent with previous reports that showed that resistance mutations were generated during azole treatment (3, 5, 6).

Besides the cyp51A mutation, the WGS comparison provided evidence for several SNPs in other genes and noncoding regions in the strains from the aspergilloma patient (Tables 3 and 4). Because most aspergillosis studies comparing serial isolates have focused on cyp51A mutations involved in azole resistance, genome-wide information about mutations occurring during infection is limited (5). Thus, the finding in this study offers a genome-wide view that genomic alterations at the SNP level are a dynamic process occurring during aspergilloma persistence. For pathogenic bacteria, several WGS-based studies have been published that uncovered mutations that arose during persistence within the host (3941). The WGS comparison approach has been increasingly applied to advance our understanding of bacterial genomic diversification during infection. In contrast, few WGS-based studies have been carried out for pathogenic fungi. The only such study recently published identified five loci that showed genetic variation between the genomes of two Cryptococcus neoformans strains serially isolated 77 days apart (42). One of these five mutations was associated with phenotypic differences in virulence factors, indicating that the WGS comparison is a powerful tool to investigate intraclonal isolates of pathogenic fungi.

The WGS comparison in this study uncovered not only genetic mutations but also a large-scale deletion (38.5 kb) in chromosome 7 of IFM 60237 (Table 6). We found 11 missing genes compared to the genomes of other strains, although the effects of the deletion on the fungal phenotype remain to be determined. Pathogenic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia pseudomallei, have been shown to acquire large deletions in their genomes during chronic infection (39, 41). Indeed, some bacterial pathogens appear to establish relatively long-term infections that may contribute to such genomic deletions. In the case of aspergilloma, fungal balls can reside asymptomatically in host lung cavities for years. The present study suggests that genomic deletions can also occur during chronic infection in pathogenic fungi, as observed in bacteria. Together, these findings prompt us to speculate that a mature fungal ball consists of genotypically identical strains that randomly accumulate mutations and genomic deletions. To verify this hypothesis, WGS comparisons should be made using larger numbers of strains recovered from one patient with aspergilloma. Although our collection of aspergilloma clinical isolates was insufficient for this purpose at the time this study was conducted, a further study is planned.

Three nonsynonymous mutations were identified from IPA isolates (Table 2). One of these in IFM 59355-2 veA was a nonsense mutation at position 400. Although it has been reported that an A. fumigatus veA-null mutant showed hyperactivation of conidiation, it is unclear if the truncated protein retained full functionality and, therefore, if decreased conidiation in this strain was associated with this mutation (43). No information is currently available about the proteins encoded by Afu2g08040 and Afu8g06170.

Six nonsynonymous mutations were found in IFM 60237 (Table 3). As stated above, the mutation in cyp51A is most likely responsible for azole resistance. The afyap1 gene encodes an oxidative stress-responsive transcriptional regulator highly conserved among fungi (44, 45). The AfYap1 protein has been reported to play a crucial role in oxidative stress tolerance but not in virulence (46). We observed an amino acid substitution (F487L) of Afyap1 in the IFM 60237 genome, which appears to be located outside the functional domains, based on conserved motif analysis. Investigations into the oxidative stress sensitivities of these strains found that they were indistinguishable in their responses to hydrogen peroxide, suggesting that the mutation in afyap1 is not related to an oxidative stress function (data not shown). During infection, pathogens are exposed to several types of stress from the host environment, including high temperature, low nutrition, hypoxia, iron deficiency, and immune responses; such stresses may promote spontaneous mutations in A. fumigatus during infection.

In conclusion, the WGS comparisons in the present study identified several genetic alterations in a set of serially isolated clinical A. fumigatus strains. The NGS analysis proved useful in discovering genomic differences between intraclonal strains that would not have been detectable using existing methods, such as MLST and microsatellite detection. In fact, our NGS analysis presented the possibility that genomic deletions occur during chronic infection in pathogenic fungi. This successful resolution paves the way for understanding dynamic alterations that occur in a fungal pathogen genome within its host, as well as how the host environment can alter phenotypic properties.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Misako Ohkusu and Yumiko Nakano for technical assistance.

This study was supported by the MEXT Special Budget for Research Projects, The Project on Controlling Aspergillosis and the Related Emerging Mycoses, in part by the National BioResource Project for Pathogenic Microbes funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (http://www.nbrp.jp/), and in part by a Cooperative Research Grant of NEKKEN (2013).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 17 September 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01105-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Denning DW. 1998. Invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:781–803. 10.1086/513943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Latgé JP. 1999. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:310–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Howard SJ, Cerar D, Anderson MJ, Albarrag A, Fisher MC, Pasqualotto AC, Laverdiere M, Arendrup MC, Perlin DS, Denning DW. 2009. Frequency and evolution of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:1068–1076. 10.3201/eid1507.090043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lelièvre L, Groh M, Angebault C, Maherault AC, Didier E, Bougnoux ME. 2013. Azole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus: an emerging problem. Med. Mal. Infect. 43:139–145. 10.1016/j.medmal.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Camps SM, van der Linden JW, Li Y, Kuijper EJ, van Dissel JT, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2012. Rapid induction of multiple resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus fumigatus during azole therapy: a case study and review of the literature. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:10–16. 10.1128/AAC.05088-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tashiro M, Izumikawa K, Hirano K, Ide S, Mihara T, Hosogaya N, Takazono T, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, Kurihara S, Imamura Y, Miyazaki T, Nishino T, Tsukamoto M, Kakeya H, Yamamoto Y, Yanagihara K, Yasuoka A, Tashiro T, Kohno S. 2012. Correlation between triazole treatment history and susceptibility in clinically isolated Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:4870–4875. 10.1128/AAC.00514-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA, Wingard JR, Patterson TF, Infectious Diseases Society of America 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:327–360. 10.1086/525258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Denning DW, Venkateswarlu K, Oakley KL, Anderson MJ, Manning NJ, Stevens DA, Warnock DW, Kelly SL. 1997. Itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1364–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Howard SJ, Arendrup MC. 2011. Acquired antifungal drug resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: epidemiology and detection. Med. Mycol. 49(Suppl 1):S90–S95. 10.3109/13693786.2010.508469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vermeulen E, Lagrou K, Verweij PE. 2013. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a growing public health concern. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 26:493–500. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krishnan Natesan S, Wu W, Cutright JL, Chandrasekar PH. 2012. In vitro-in vivo correlation of voriconazole resistance due to G448S mutation (cyp51A gene) in Aspergillus fumigatus. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 74:272–277. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mann PA, Parmegiani RM, Wei SQ, Mendrick CA, Li X, Loebenberg D, DiDomenico B, Hare RS, Walker SS, McNicholas PM. 2003. Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus resulting in reduced susceptibility to posaconazole appear to be restricted to a single amino acid in the cytochrome P450 14alpha-demethylase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:577–581. 10.1128/AAC.47.2.577-581.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen J, Li H, Li R, Bu D, Wan Z. 2005. Mutations in the cyp51A gene and susceptibility to itraconazole in Aspergillus fumigatus serially isolated from a patient with lung aspergilloma. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:31–37. 10.1093/jac/dkh507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Valk HA, Meis JF, Curfs IM, Muehlethaler K, Mouton JW, Klaassen CH. 2005. Use of a novel panel of nine short tandem repeats for exact and high-resolution fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4112–4120. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.4112-4120.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klaassen CH. 2009. MLST versus microsatellites for typing Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Med. Mycol. 47(Suppl l):S27–S33. 10.1080/13693780802382244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Denning DW, Shankland GS, Stevens DA. 1991. DNA fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from patients with aspergilloma. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 29:339–342. 10.1080/02681219180000521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Loudon KW, Burnie JP, Coke AP, Matthews RC. 1993. Application of polymerase chain reaction to fingerprinting Aspergillus fumigatus by random amplification of polymorphic DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1117–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Howard SJ, Pasqualotto AC, Anderson MJ, Leatherbarrow H, Albarrag AM, Harrison E, Gregson L, Bowyer P, Denning DW. 2013. Major variations in Aspergillus fumigatus arising within aspergillomas in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 56:434–441. 10.1111/myc.12047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Camps SM, Dutilh BE, Arendrup MC, Rijs AJ, Snelders E, Huynen MA, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2012. Discovery of a hapE mutation that causes azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus through whole genome sequencing and sexual crossing. PLoS One 7:e50034. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Muñoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1813–1821. 10.1086/588660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Denning DW. 2001. Chronic forms of pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7(Suppl 2):S25–S31. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2001.tb00006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shimizu K, Keller NP. 2001. Genetic involvement of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase in a G protein signaling pathway regulating morphological and chemical transitions in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 157:591–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hagiwara D, Takahashi-Nakaguchi A, Toyotome T, Yoshimi A, Abe K, Kamei K, Gonoi T, Kawamoto S. 2013. NikA/TcsC histidine kinase is involved in conidiation, hyphal morphology, and responses to osmotic stress and antifungal chemicals in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS One 8:e80881. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aronesty E. 2013. Comparison of sequencing utility programs. Open Bioinform. J. 7:1–8. 10.2174/1875036201307010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arnaud MB, Cerqueira GC, Inglis DO, Skrzypek MS, Binkley J, Chibucos MC, Crabtree J, Howarth C, Orvis J, Shah P, Wymore F, Binkley G, Miyasato SR, Simison M, Sherlock G, Wortman JR. 2012. The Aspergillus Genome Database (AspGD): recent developments in comprehensive multispecies curation, comparative genomics and community resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:653–659. 10.1093/nar/gkr875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Arroyo J, Berriman M, Abe K, Archer DB, Bermejo C, Bennett J, Bowyer P, Chen D, Collins M, Coulsen R, Davies R, Dyer PS, Farman M, Fedorova N, Fedorova N, Feldblyum TV, Fischer R, Fosker N, Fraser A, García JL, García MJ, Goble A, Goldman GH, Gomi K, Griffith-Jones S, Gwilliam R, Haas B, Haas H, Harris D, Horiuchi H, Huang J, Humphray S, Jiménez J, Keller N, Khouri H, Kitamoto K, Kobayashi T, Konzack S, Kulkarni R, Kumagai T, Lafton A, Latgé JP, Li W, Lord A, Lu C, et al. 2005. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 438:1151–1156. 10.1038/nature04332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9:357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gillece JD, Schupp JM, Balajee SA, Harris J, Pearson T, Yan Y, Keim P, DeBess E, Marsden-Haug N, Wohrle R, Engelthaler DM, Lockhart SR. 2011. Whole genome sequence analysis of Cryptococcus gattii from the Pacific Northwest reveals unexpected diversity. PLoS One 6:e28550. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holt KE, Teo YY, Li H, Nair S, Dougan G, Wain J, Parkhill J. 2009. Detecting SNPs and estimating allele frequencies in clonal bacterial populations by sequencing pooled DNA. Bioinformatics 25:2074–2075. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. 2011. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29:24–26. 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. 2013. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 14:178–192. 10.1093/bib/bbs017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stanke M, Waack S. 2003. Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics 19(Suppl 2):ii215–ii225. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cerqueira GC, Arnaud MB, Inglis DO, Skrzypek MS, Binkley G, Simison M, Miyasato SR, Binkley J, Orvis J, Shah P, Wymore F, Sherlock G, Wortman JR. 2014. The Aspergillus Genome Database: multispecies curation and incorporation of RNA-Seq data to improve structural gene annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:D705–D710. 10.1093/nar/gkt1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389–3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kikuchi K, Watanabe A, Ito J, Oku Y, Wuren T, Taguchi H, Yarita K, Muraosa Y, Yahiro M, Yaguchi T, Kamei K. 2014. Antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates collected from various areas in Japan. J. Infect. Chemother. 20:336–338. 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. CLSI document M38-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fedorova ND, Khaldi N, Joardar VS, Maiti R, Amedeo P, Anderson MJ, Crabtree J, Silva JC, Badger JH, Albarraq A, Angiuoli S, Bussey H, Bowyer P, Cotty PJ, Dyer PS, Egan A, Galens K, Fraser-Liggett CM, Haas BJ, Inman JM, Kent R, Lemieux S, Malavazi I, Orvis J, Roemer T, Ronning CM, Sundaram JP, Sutton G, Turner G, Venter JC, White OR, Whitty BR, Youngman P, Wolfe KH, Goldman GH, Wortman JR, Jiang B, Denning DW, Nierman WC. 2008. Genomic islands in the pathogenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000046. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cramer N, Klockgether J, Wrasman K, Schmidt M, Davenport CF, Tümmler B. 2011. Microevolution of the major common Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones C and PA14 in cystic fibrosis lungs. Environ. Microbiol. 13:1690–1704. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hornsey M, Loman N, Wareham DW, Ellington MJ, Pallen MJ, Turton JF, Underwood A, Gaulton T, Thomas CP, Doumith M, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2011. Whole-genome comparison of two Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a single patient, where resistance developed during tigecycline therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66:1499–1503. 10.1093/jac/dkr168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Price EP, Sarovich DS, Mayo M, Tuanyok A, Drees KP, Kaestli M, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, Babic-Sternberg JS, Kidd TJ, Bell SC, Keim P, Pearson T, Currie BJ. 2013. Within-host evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei over a twelve-year chronic carriage infection. mBio 4(4):e00388-13. 10.1128/mBio.00388-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ormerod KL, Morrow CA, Chow EW, Lee IR, Arras SD, Schirra HJ, Cox GM, Fries BC, Fraser JA. 2013. Comparative genomics of serial isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans reveals gene associated with carbon utilization and virulence. G3 (Bethesda) 3:675–686. 10.1534/g3.113.005660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Park HS, Bayram O, Braus GH, Kim SC, Yu JH. 2012. Characterization of the velvet regulators in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol. Microbiol. 86:937–953. 10.1111/mmi.12032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Asano Y, Hagiwara D, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. 2007. Characterization of the bZip-type transcription factor NapA with reference to oxidative stress response in Aspergillus nidulans. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71:1800–1803. 10.1271/bbb.70133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodrigues-Pousada CA, Nevitt T, Menezes R, Azevedo D, Pereira J, Amaral C. 2004. Yeast activator proteins and stress response: an overview. FEBS Lett. 567:80–85. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qiao J, Kontoyiannis DP, Calderone R, Li D, Ma Y, Wan Z, Li R, Liu W. 2008. Afyap1, encoding a bZip transcriptional factor of Aspergillus fumigatus, contributes to oxidative stress response but is not essential to the virulence of this pathogen in mice immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide and triamcinolone. Med. Mycol. 46:773–782. 10.1080/13693780802054215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES