Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Nov 13;54(2):532–535. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409454

Low Temperature N2 Binding to 2-coordinate L2Fe0 Enables Reductive Trapping of L2FeN2 and NH3 Generation.**

Gatël Ung 1, Jonas C Peters 1,
PMCID: PMC4314396  NIHMSID: NIHMS642891  PMID: 25394570

Abstract

The 2-coordinate (CAAC)2Fe complex [CAAC = cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene] binds dinitrogen at low temperature (T < −80 °C). The resulting putative 3-coordinate N2-complex, (CAAC)2Fe(N2), was trapped by one electron reduction to its corresponding anion [(CAAC)2FeN2] at low temperature. This complex was structurally characterized and features an activated dinitrogen unit that can be silylated at the β-nitrogen. The redox linked complexes (CAAC)2FeIBArF24, (CAAC)2Fe0 and [(CAAC)2Fe−IN2] were all found to be active for the reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia upon treatment with reductant (KC8) and acid (HBArF24·2Et2O) at −95 °C (up to 3.4 ±1.0 equivalent of ammonia per Fe center). The N2 reduction activity is highly temperature dependent, with significant N2 reduction to NH3 only occurring below −78 °C. This reactivity profile tracks with the low temperatures needed for N2 binding and an otherwise unavailable electron transfer step to generate reactive [(CAAC)2FeN2].

Keywords: Iron, Nitrogen fixation, Low-coordinate, Carbenes


While hundreds of transition-metal-N2 complexes have been prepared and studied,[1] comparatively few systems afford access to productive N2 functionalization.[2] This is particularly true for the case of N2 functionalization by protons and electrons to produce NH3 (or N2H4). Building on extensive early Mo and W model work,[3] Schrock[4] and Nishibayashi[5] have reported Mo-containing coordination complexes (A and B in Figure 1, respectively) that facilitate catalytic N2 reduction to NH3 in the presence of suitable acids and reductants. Because Fe is (i) the only transition metal known to be essential to enzymatic nitrogenase function,[6] and (ii) the predominant transition metal catalyst used in the Haber-Bosch ammonia synthesis,[7] studying N2 reduction chemistry at well-defined Fe model complexes is of interest.[8,9] Recently, our lab demonstrated that Fe coordination complexes (C in Figure 1) are capable of modest catalytic N2 reduction to NH3.[10]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative Mo and Fe complexes studied for catalytic N2 reduction to NH3. R = tBu; R’ = H, OMe; HIPT = hexaisopropylterphenyl; E = B, C; M = K, Na.

The functional Fe-N2 reduction systems we have studied to date are phosphine supported 5-coordinate XL3Fe-N2 adducts. It is of interest to explore whether other donor ligands and geometries might expose similar reactivity patterns for Fe-N2 species.[11,12] For example, Holland and co-workers recently reported a solution characterization of a 3-coordinate Fe complex with an N2 ligand linearly bridged between Fe and a solvated Mg cation (D in Figure 1).[13,14] The N2 ligand in this complex is highly activated. However, only trace NH3 (< 2% per Fe) could be detected upon attempts to mediate its reductive protonation. Related low-coordinate Fe-N2 species can undergo reductive N2 cleavage which, when followed by a separate acidic work-up, can achieve higher ammonia yields (ca. 35% overall).[8c] Understanding subtle factors that lead to productive reactivity at N2 is essential to improving molecular nitrogen fixation catalysts.

We recently reported the utilization of a π-accepting cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC)[15] to synthesize a structurally unusual 2-coordinate, formally L2Fe0 complex by reduction of its corresponding 2-coordinate FeI cation.[16] We reasoned that the polarizability of the CAAC ligand, by comparison to typical NHCs,[17] might better facilitate N2 binding and productive functionalization. Note that low-valent Fe-carbene complexes[18] have to date been surprisingly resistant to N2 binding, with the tripodal, N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) containing, systems of Meyer[19] and Smith[20] underscoring this point. To our knowledge, a bis(imidazol-2-ylidene)pyridine scaffold is the only Fe-carbene derivative where N2 binding has been established.[21] Here we show that the 2-coordinate (CAAC)2Fe complex binds N2, but only at low temperature, and that this binding event exposes an otherwise unavailable 1-electron reduction step to form 3-coordinate (CAAC)2Fe(N2) and desirable reactivity at the coordinated N2.

Under an atmosphere of N2, a solution of (CAAC)2Fe in pentane exhibited drastic changes in the absorption spectrum upon cooling at temperatures below −80 °C (Figure 2A). This temperature dependent change in the optical profile of (CAAC)2Fe under N2 was reversible over several cooling-warming cycles. To confirm that the change in the optical spectrum was indeed related to the presence of N2, the solution was thoroughly degassed by five freeze-pump-thaw cycles and variable temperature UV-vis spectra were re-collected (See SI Figure S7, right). In this case, the standard spectrum of (CAAC)2Fe was recovered. Re-exposing the solution to N2 resulted in the previously observed temperature dependent profile. Thermodynamic parameters were extracted from a van’t Hoff plot of the experimental data (See SI). As expected, binding of dinitrogen is exothermic (ΔH = −22.1 kcal mol−1) and is associated with negative entropy (ΔS = −8.1 cal K−1 mol−1). These parameters are similar to those recently reported for N2 coordination at Co.[21] The N2 binding constant at room temperature is very low (Keq = 0.2), consistent with our initial report of a 2-coordinate (CAAC)2Fe complex.[16]

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A. Variable temperature UV-vis spectra of (CAAC)2Fe in a pentane solution. a) under N2 atmosphere; b) under vacuum. B. X-Band EPR spectra at 10 K: a) [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] in a frozen Et2O glass; b) (CAAC)2Fe(N2SiEt3) in a frozen methylcyclohexane glass. C.57Fe Mössbauer spectra for microcrystalline samples obtained at 80 K in boron nitride pellets. a) [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)]; b) (CAAC)2Fe(N2SiEt3). Solid red lines correspond to the simulated data. Solid blue line in a) correspond to a minor species (~ 9% of Fe) parameters of δ = 0.74 mm s−1 and ΔEQ = 3.79 mm s−1. D. Structure of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] in the solid state. Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.[23] Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): C1–Fe1 = 1.924(2), C2–Fe1 = 1.919(2), C1–N1 = 1.386(3), C2–N2 = 1.411(3), Fe1–N3 = 1.778(3), N3–N4 = 1.035(4), N4–K1 = 2.726(4); C1–Fe1–C2 = 140.81(10), C1–Fe1–N3 = 101.91(11), C2–Fe1–N3 = 117.08(11), Fe1–N3–N4 = 175.5(3).

To structurally confirm the binding of dinitrogen at low temperature, we sought to trap the putative complex (CAAC)2Fe(N2) (Scheme 1). The presence of an additional π-accepting ligand (N2) facilitates the further reduction of (CAAC)2Fe0 to a formal Fe−I. Hence, reduction of (CAAC)2Fe with KC8 at −95 °C in diethyl ether in the presence of 18-crown-6 yielded, after work-up, dark brown crystals of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)] [K(18-crown-6)] in moderate yield (42%) (Scheme 1). Temperature control was crucial: reduction at room temperature resulted instead in decomposition of the starting material to intractable products, and at −78 °C, only traces of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)] could be detected by IR spectroscopy. An XRD study of crystals of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)] [K(18-crown-6)] confirmed the binding of N2 to a 3-coordinate Fe center in an end-on fashion with an additional ion-pair of the β-N-atom to the K(18-crown-6) cation (Figure 2D).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Reduction of (CAAC)2Fe and subsequent trapping with silylating reagents. Dipp = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl; R = Me, Et.

The structure of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)] [K(18-crown-6)] reveals a distorted trigonal planar Fe center (Σangle = 359.8°), with a very wide C-Fe-C angle (140.81(10)°). The C-N distances of the CAAC ligand are substantially elongated: they are 1.386(3) and 1.411(3) Å, compared with 1.315(3) Å for the free ligand.[15c] This C-N lengthening is indicative of a substantial amount of spin leakage from the highly reduced Fe center to the supporting CAAC ligand.[16] Complex [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)] [K(18-crown-6)] represents a rare example of a structurally characterized pseudo-terminally bonded, 3-coordinate Fe-N2 complex.[13,14]

A sharp band was observed in the IR spectrum of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] at 1850 cm−1 (ATR-IR; thin film), attributed to the νNN stretch. This value is higher in energy than the transiently observed [β-diketimidatoFe(N2)]2Mg(thf)4 species reported by Holland and co-workers (1818 cm−1),[13] but lower than other anionic terminal Fe-N2 complexes where the Fe center resides in higher coordination numbers (1905 – 1927 cm−1).[9,10a] As expected for a formal Fe−I species, a room temperature solution magnetic moment for [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] of 1.9µB in C6D6 was measured, consistent with its frozen glass (Et2O) EPR spectrum (Figure 2B, a) and indicative of an S = 1/2 ground state.

Exposure of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] to trimethylsilylchloride in diethyl ether resulted in a rapid color change from dark brown-red to dark green. A diagnostic broad band at 1675 cm−1 was observed in the IR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture, reminiscent of previously observed νNN stretches for Fe-silyldiazenido complexes.[9,10a] The presumed diazenido product (CAAC)2Fe(N2SiMe3) rapidly decomposed upon attempted work-up to the (CAAC)2Fe complex. A bulkier silylating reagent led to a more stable product. Hence, a similar change of color from dark brown-red to dark green was observed when triethylsilylchloride was added to the [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] complex (Scheme 1). The diazenido product, (CAAC)2Fe(N2SiEt3) was isolated as an analytically pure, dark green solid in moderate yield (52%). Its IR spectrum exhibits a broad band at 1690 cm−1. Complex (CAAC)2Fe(N2SiEt3) is high spin S = 3/2 (room temperature solution magnetic moment of 3.9µB), consistent with its frozen glass EPR spectrum at 10 K showing broad signals at low field (Figure 2B, b). Its electronic structure is therefore distinct from previously characterized 5-coordinate XL3Fe(N2SiR3) species that are low spin. For instance, (TPiPrB)Fe(N2SiMe3) is an S = 1/2 species.[9b]

The57Fe Mössbauer spectra of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] and (CAAC)2Fe(N2SiEt3) were recorded at 80 K in the solid state (Figure 2C). Fits to the data provided isomer shifts at δ = 0.56 and δ = 0.59 mm s−1, respectively, with quadrupole splitting of ΔEQ = 1.67 and ΔEQ = 1.60 mm s−1. The isomer shift value is in line with previously reported 3-coordinate bis-carbene Fe complexes.[16,24] For example, (CAAC)2FeCl has an isomer shift of 0.52 mm s−1. The spectrum of [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)][K(18-crown-6)] displays an asymmetrical doublet presumably caused by anisotropy in the polycrystalline sample.[25] A minor component (~9% of the total Fe content), whose parameters fit the oxidation product [(CAAC)2Fe]+,[16] was also detected (Figure 2C, a).

In previous studies of 5-coordinate Fe-N2 species, we have empirically determined that the ability to successfully silylate the β-N-atom of an Fe-N2 derivative can translate to efficacy of the system towards reductive protonation.[9c,10] Attempts to fix N2 to NH3 at room temperature using (CAAC)2Fe in the presence of excess KC8 and HBArF24·2Et2O in diethyl ether, regardless of the order of addition, proved largely ineffective (Table 1; See SI Figure S12). This observation is consistent with a very limited degree of N2 binding to (CAAC)2Fe at room temperature, and the requirement that a (CAAC)2Fe(N2) species be present to facilitate N2 fixation. Indeed, when (CAAC)2Fe was treated at −95 °C with an excess of KC8 (50 eq), followed by an excess of HBArF24∙2Et2O (50 eq), the formation of 3.3 ±1.1 equivalents of NH3 per Fe center was observed. Similar yields (3.4 ±1.0 eq) were obtained employing the 2-coordinate Fe(I) cation [(CAAC)2Fe][BArF24] under the same conditions at −95 °C. The enhancement of the N2-to-NH3 reduction yield at very low temperature correlates with the variable temperature optical data for (CAAC)2Fe, which shows that N2 binding to (CAAC)2Fe becomes favorable only at low temperature. Indeed, the yield of NH3 is negligible at −50 °C (0.3 eq) and is still quite low at −78 °C (0.9 eq). Note that significantly lower temperature (−113 °C) was examined but did not improve the NH3 yield beyond that obtained at −95 °C.

Table 1.

Catalytic reduction of N2 to NH3[a]

graphic file with name nihms642891t1.jpg
Run Catalyst T Eq NH3 per Fe
1 (CAAC)2Fe −113 °C 3.0 ±0.7
2 (CAAC)2Fe −95 °C 3.3 ±1.1
3 (CAAC)2Fe −78 °C 0.9 ±0.3[b]
4 (CAAC)2Fe −50 °C 0.3 ±0.2[b]
5 (CAAC)2Fe 23 °C 0.4 ±0.2[b]
6 (CAAC)2FeBArF24 −95 °C 3.4 ±1.0
7 (CAAC)2FeN2K(18-c-6) −95 °C 2.6 ±0.6
8 CAAC[c] −95 °C < 0.1
9 None −95 °C < 0.1
[a]

Catalytic conditions: catalyst: 0.002 mmol, KC8: 0.1 mmol, HBArF24·2Et2O: 0.1 mmol, Et2O, 45 min; yields are an average of 8 independent runs.

[b]

Average of 4 runs.

[c]

0.004 mmol of CAAC used.

Although these NH3 yields are low compared with our two previously reported Fe catalysts[10] Schrock’s original Mo system,[4] and especially Nishibayashi’s recently improved Mo system,[5a] (CAAC)2Fe is nevertheless a very modest catalyst for nitrogen fixation to ammonia and the yields of NH3 per Fe equivalent reported here are far greater than those that have been observed for previously studied 3-coordinate Fe-N2 complexes (< 0.2 eq per Fe), including [β-diketimidatoFe(N2)]2Mg(thf)4 species (Figure 1).[13] We speculate that the ability of (CAAC)2Fe/(CAAC)2Fe(N2) to perform nitrogen fixation may arise from the relative flexibility of the system, capable of switching between 2- and 3-coordinate geometries, and allowing for the formation of highly covalent Fe-Nx multiple-bond interactions. The recent isolation of a 3-coordinate Fe-bis(imide) complex supported by CAAC by Deng and co-workers is noted in the latter context.[26]

For comparison, we also explored (CAAC)2Fe in the context of catalytic N2 silylation. Catalytic silylation reactions of N2 under strongly reducing conditions have been known for many years using metals such as Cr,[27] Ti[28] and Mo,[29] and recently, such silylations were extended to systems using Fe pre-catalysts including Fe(CO)5 and Cp2Fe.[30] For example, Fe(CO)5 was shown to produce up to 25 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3 per Fe in the presence of a vast excess sodium metal and TMSCl at room temperature.[30] These silylation reactions remain mechanistically ill-defined. Only trace yield of N(SiMe3)3 could be detected using Nishibayashi’s conditions (Na as reductant, in THF)[30] with (CAAC)2Fe as pre-catalyst. However, when a catalytic amount of (CAAC)2Fe was instead treated with a large excess of KC8 (600 eq) and trimethylsilylchloride (600 eq), the formation of 24.4 ± 2.7 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3 was observed (See Table S1 in the SI for details). Slightly lower TONs (19.4 ±3.0) were obtained using (CAAC)2FeBArF24 as a pre-catalyst instead. The catalytic activity was significantly reduced (7.0 ±1.0) when the reaction was performed at −78 °C. The attenuation in N(SiMe3)3 product is presumably related to slower generation of trimethylsilyl radical at low temperature.

Although it is presently unclear what the mechanistic requirements are for the N2-to-N(SiMe3)3 catalysis mediated by various Fe precursors including (CAAC)2Fe, the N2-to-NH3 chemistry described herein appears to require a well-defined molecular Fe-N2 species. Indeed, significant N2-to-NH3 conversion is observed only at the low temperatures where N2 binds (CAAC)2Fe sufficiently favorably. The low-temperature N2 binding event facilitates subsequent electron-transfer, evidenced by the very low temperature required to synthetically reduce (CAAC)2Fe(N2) and isolate highly reactive [(CAAC)2Fe(N2)].

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Footnotes

**

This work was supported by the N.I.H. (GM 070757) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We thank Larry Henling and Michael K. Takase for crystallographic assistance.

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201xxxxxx.

References

  • 1.a) MacKay BA, Fryzuk MD. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:358. doi: 10.1021/cr020610c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Fryzuk MD, Johnson SA. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000;200:379. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Crossland JL, Tyler DR. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010;254:1883. [Google Scholar]; b) Hidai M, Mizobe Y. Chem. Rev. 1995;95:1115. [Google Scholar]; c) Chatt J, Dilworth JR, Richards RL. Chem. Rev. 1978;78:589. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Hidai M, Mizobe Y. Can. J. Chem. 2005;83:358. [Google Scholar]; b) Shilov AE. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2003;52:2555. [Google Scholar]; c) Bazhenova TA, Shilov AE. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995;144:69. [Google Scholar]; d) Pickett CJ, Talarmin J. Nature. 1985;317:652. [Google Scholar]; e) Chatt J, Pearman AJ, Richards RL. Nature. 1975;253:39. doi: 10.1038/259204a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Chatt J, Heath GA, Richards RL. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1974:2074. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yandulov DV, Schrock RR. Science. 2003;301:76. doi: 10.1126/science.1085326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Kuriyama S, Arashiba K, Nakajima K, Tanaka H, Kamaru N, Yoshizawa K, Nishibayashi Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:9719. doi: 10.1021/ja5044243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Arashiba K, Miyake Y, Nishibayashi Y. Nat. Chem. 2011;3:120. doi: 10.1038/nchem.906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang J, Xie X, Wang X, Dixon R, Wang Y-P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014;111:E3718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411185111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu H. Ammonia Synthesis Catalysts: Innovation and Practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd; Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Leigh GJ, Jimenez-Tenorio M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:5862. [Google Scholar]; b) Gilbertson JD, Szymczak NK, Tyler DR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:10184. doi: 10.1021/ja053030g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Rodriguez MM, Bill E, Brennessel WW, Holland PL. Science. 2011;334:780. doi: 10.1126/science.1211906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Rittle J, Peters JC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:15898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310153110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Moret M-E, Peters JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:18118. doi: 10.1021/ja208675p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Moret M-E, Peters JC. Angew. Chem. 2011;123:2111. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006918. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2063; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Lee Y, Mankad NP, Peters JC. Nat. Chem. 2010;2:558. doi: 10.1038/nchem.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Creutz SE, Peters JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:1105. doi: 10.1021/ja4114962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Anderson JS, Rittle J, Peters JC. Nature. 2013;501:84. doi: 10.1038/nature12435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Betley TA, Peters JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:6252. doi: 10.1021/ja048713v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Betley TA, Peters JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:10782. doi: 10.1021/ja036687f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.MacLeod KC, Holland PL. Nat. Chem. 2013;5:559. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dugan TR, MacLeod KC, Brennessel WW, Holland PL. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013:3891. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201300187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.a) Smith JM, Sadique AR, Cundari TR, Rodgers KR, Lukat-Rodgers G, Lachicotte RJ, Flaschenriem CJ, Vela J, Holland PL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;128:756. doi: 10.1021/ja052707x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Smith JM, Lachicotte RJ, Pittard KA, Cundari TR, Lukat-Rodgers G, Rodgers KR, Holland PL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:222. doi: 10.1021/ja016094+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lavallo V, Canac Y, Prasang C, Donnadieu B, Bertrand G. Angew. Chem. 2005;117:5851. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501841. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ung G, Rittle J, Soleilhavoup M, Bertrand G, Peters JC. Angew. Chem. 2014;126:8567. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404078. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Back O, Henry-Ellinger M, Martin CD, Martin D, Bertrand G. Angew. Chem. 2013;125:3011. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209109. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.For reviews on low-valent Fe-carbene complexes, see: Riener K, Haslinger S, Raba A, Högerl MP, Cokoja M, Herrmann WA, Kühn FE. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:5215. doi: 10.1021/cr4006439. Bézier D, Sortais J-B, Darcel C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013;355:19. Ingleson MJ, Layfield RA. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:3579. doi: 10.1039/c2cc18021a.
  • 19.Vogel CS, Heinemann FW, Khusniyarov MM, Meyer K. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2010;364:226. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nieto I, Cervantes-Lee F, Smith JM. Chem. Commun. 2005:3811. doi: 10.1039/b505985b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Danopoulos AA, Wright JA, Motherwell WB. Chem. Commun. 2005:784. doi: 10.1039/b415562a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suess DLM, Tsay C, Peters JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:14158. doi: 10.1021/ja305248f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.CCDC 1025565 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
  • 24.Mo Z, Ouyang Z, Wang L, Fillman KL, Neidig ML, Deng L. Org. Chem. Front. 2014;1:1040. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.a) Gütlich P, Link R, Trautwein A. Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Transition Metal Chemistry. Berlin Heidelberg New-York: Springer-Verlag; 1978. [Google Scholar]; b) Goldanskii VI, Herber R. Chemical Applications of Mössbauer Spectroscopy. New York: Academic Press; 1964. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang H, Ouyang Z, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Wang L, Deng L. Angew. Chem. 2014;126:8572. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404677. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shiina K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972;94:9266. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mori M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004;689:4210. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.a) Nishibayashi Y. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:7447. doi: 10.1039/c2dt30105a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Tanaka H, Sasada A, Kouno T, Yuki M, Miyake Y, Nakanishi H, Nishibayashi Y, Yoshizawa K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:3498. doi: 10.1021/ja109181n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Komori K, Oshita H, Mizobe Y, Hidai M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:1939. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yuki M, Tanaka H, Sasaki K, Miyake Y, Yoshizawa K, Nishibayashi Y. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1254. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES