Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Carbohydr Res. 2014 Aug 2;405:110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2014.07.020

Heparin Nanoparticles for β Amyloid Binding and Mitigation of β Amyloid Associated Cytotoxicity

Peng Wang a, Hovig Kouyoumdjian a, David C Zhu b, Xuefei Huang a,
PMCID: PMC4314519  NIHMSID: NIHMS619111  PMID: 25498198

Abstract

Accumulation of β amyloid (Aβ) in the brain is believed to play a key role in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Glycosaminoglycans on surface of neuronal cells can serve as nucleation sites to promote plaque formation on cell surface. To mimic this process, magnetic nanoparticles coated with heparin have been synthesized. The heparin nanoparticles were demonstrated to bind with Aβ through a variety of techniques including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, gel electrophoresis and thioflavin T assay. The nanoparticle exhibited little toxicity to neuronal cells and at the same time can effectively protect them from Aβ induced cytotoxicity. These results suggest that heparin nanoparticles can be a very useful tool for Aβ studies.

Keywords: amyloid β, binding study, cytotoxicity, heparin, nanoparticle

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has become the most common form of dementia, which is affecting about 5.2 million Americans.1 The number of AD patients is predicted to increase significantly and expected to triple by 2050.2 One of the main pathological hallmarks of AD is the senile plaques formed by Aβ. Aβ is derived from amyloid precursor protein processing by β- and γ-secretases and proposed to be a causative agent of AD.3 Aβ can aggregate into highly toxic oligomers and deposit as plaques on the cerebral cortex damaging the nervous system.46 Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are believed to play a central role in the amyloidosis pathway with many GAG bearing proteoglycans (PGs) found in both diffuse and neuritic amyloid plaques.78 GAGs on surface of neuronal cells have been suggested to serve as nucleating sites for Aβ aggregation, contribute to the formation of neurotoxic Aβ deposits on cells.914

Heparin is a member of the GAG family, which is known to be able to bind with Aβ.12, 1516 We envision that nanoparticles coated with heparin can be utilized to mimic PG bearing neuronal cells and potentially compete for their interactions with Aβ. Although heparin nanoparticles have been utilized for cancer targeting, anti-coagulation, tissue engineering and drug delivery applications,1722 their interactions with Aβ have not been studied before. Herein we report the synthesis of heparin-functionalized magnetic glyconanoparticles. These nanoparticles can bind with Aβ, induce the formation of fibril, and protect neuronal cells from Aβ induced cell death.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Preparation and Characterization of Hep-SPION

We selected magnetic nanoparticles as the core of our heparin nanoparticles, since magnetic nanoparticles are a powerful platform for biological applications due to their high surface area, biocompatibility and magnetic relaxivity.2325 Two methods were explored to immobilize heparin polysaccharides onto magnetic nanoparticles. In the first approach, we adapted our previous synthesis of colloidal hyaluronan nanoparticles.26 Magnetite nanoparticles were first produced through the thermal decomposition method, resulting in hydrophobic magnetic nanoparticles mainly coated with oleic acid (Scheme 1A). Exchanging the oleic acid ligand with heparin was performed in a water/toluene biphasic system. However, although the resulting nanoparticles could be dispersed in water or phosphate buffered saline (PBS), they quickly precipitated out of aqueous solutions. This was most likely due to the lower efficiency of ligand displacement from the hydrophobic nanoparticles by heparin as compared to hyaluronan, as heparin is more charged and presumably less soluble in the organic solvent for ligand exchange.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of heparin coated magnetic nanoparticles by A) the thermal decomposition and ligand exchange method; and B) the co-precipitation method.

An entirely aqueous solution based synthetic route was tested next. The magnetite core was constructed by the co-precipitation method by mixing ferric chloride and ferrous chloride with ammonium hydroxide in water (Scheme 1B).22 The resulting superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) were collected with a magnet and resuspended in water. Heparin sodium salt was then added, which could chelate with the SPIONs. Removal of excess heparin by ultrafiltration produced the heparin-coated SPIONs (Hep-SPION), which was a stable colloidal suspension in water with no visible precipitates for weeks at the concentration of 2.5 mg/mL.

Hep-SPION was characterized with a series of techniques including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta potential and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). TEM images showed that the magnetite core had an average diameter around 10 nm (Figure 1A), with the hydrodynamic diameters of 68 nm in water and 59 nm in PBS buffer respectively. The successful attachment of heparin was supported by TGA analysis. While the amount of organic compounds only accounted for 3% of the gross weight of SPION by TGA analysis, heating the Hep-SPION to above 700 °C led to 63% weight loss suggesting that about 60% of the Hep-SPION mass was due to heparin attachment (Figure 1B). Furthermore, the zeta potential of the nanoparticles changed from +12.3 mV (SPION) to −53.3 mV (Hep-SPION), consistent with the high negative charge of heparin on Hep-SPION.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) TEM characterization of Hep-SPION; (B) TGA of SPION and Hep-SPION.

2.2. Assessment of Binding between Aβ and Hep-SPION by ELISA

With the Hep-SPION in hand, its interaction with Aβ was investigated first by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Naturally isolated Aβ peptides exist in variable lengths ranging from 36 to 42 amino acid residues. We chose Aβ1–42 for our study, as it is the more amyloidogenic Aβ form.2728 Furthermore, it is prone to aggregation6, 29 and is one the major species found in the senile plaques of AD brains.30

For the ELISA, Aβ1–42 monomers were dissolved in 10 mM NaOH, neutralized with HCl and were incubated at 37°C for 2 days. The resulting fibrils were added to a 96-well plate, which could adhere to the surface of the wells. Upon removal of the unbound peptide, the bound Aβ was detected by an anti-Aβ IgG monoclonal antibody 6E10 (mAb) using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated anti-IgG secondary antibody and 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate. The relative amounts of Aβ bound in each well could be determined from the absorbance at 450 nm.

To test heparin nanoparticle binding, Aβ fibrils were pre-mixed with varying concentrations of Hep-SPION and added to ELISA plate wells. After incubating overnight and washing off unbound material, the amounts of Aβ remaining in the well were semi-quantified by ELISA. A concentration dependent decrease in absorbance at 450 nm with increasing amounts of Hep-SPION was observed (Figure 2). This was interpreted that as Hep-SPION bound Aβ, it should coat the surface of the fibril. As a result, it could shield the Aβ from adhesion to the plate or sterically block the recognition of Aβ by the antibody leading to reduced absorbance from the wells. Hep-SPION did not bind to the surface of wells (data not shown), thus precluding the possibility that the decrease in absorbance was due to Hep-SPION passivating the wells. Incubation of Aβ with uncoated SPION showed no effect on the absorbance, revealing the crucial role of heparin on the surface of nanoparticles (Figure S1). The ability of heparin to inhibit Aβ adhesion to the plate was also measured, which was similar to that of Hep-SPION.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Aβ binding to plate decreased with increasing concentrations of Hep-SPION. The bound Aβ was detected by an anti-Aβ IgG mAb 6E10, followed by addition of HRP-conjugated anti-IgG secondary antibody and the TMB substrate.

2.3. Effect of Hep-SPION on Aβ Aggregation

As Hep-SPION can bind with Aβ, we analyzed its effects on Aβ aggregation by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Aβ monomers (25 μM) were incubated in the presence or absence of Hep-SPION at 37°C for 2 days followed by analysis via native PAGE. Without any Hep-SPION, Aβ existed as a mixture of high molecular weight fibrils and a major oligomer species with molecular weight close to that of a trimer (Figure 3A). The formation of the trimer-like oligomer was consistent with the quiescent condition utilized for fibril formation.3132 With increasing concentrations of Hep-SPION (0.0078, 0.0156, 0.0312, 0.125 mg/mL), the relative amounts of the low-molecular-weight Aβ oligomers decreased (Figure 3A). At the concentration of 0.125 mg/mL Hep-SPION, almost all Aβ (>90%) had formed large fibrils appearing at higher molecular weight region on the gel (Figure 3A,B). This suggested that Hep-SPION can reduce the amount of the oligomers.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) PAGE gel of Aβ only (lane 1) or Aβ (25 μM) incubated with 0.0078 mg/mL (lane 2), 0.0156 mg/mL (lane 3), 0.0312mg/mL (lane 4) and 0.125 mg/mL (lane 5) of Hep-SPION. (B) Percentage of low-molecular-weight Aβ oligomer in total Aβ in presence of various concentrations of Hep-SPION. The percentage was calculated by dividing the intensity of the low molecular weight oligomer band by the sum of the intensities of all bands in the specific lane.

To further confirm the effect of Hep-SPION on Aβ aggregation, a thioflavin T (ThT) binding assay was performed. ThT is a cationic benzothiazole dye33 that displays enhanced fluorescence when interacting with β-sheeted structures (Figure 4, 1st vs 2nd column). While Aβ monomer can undergo spontaneous aggregation towards fibril (Figure 3a, lane 1), Hep-SPION accelerated β-sheeted fibril formation and gave rise to markedly enhanced ThT fluorescence (Figure 4, 3rd – 5th column). Hep-SPION itself did not result in any fluorescence enhancement of ThT even at the highest nanoparticle concentration tested (Figure 4, 6th column), which excluded the direct effect of Hep-SPION on ThT fluorescence. Uncoated SPION without any heparin did not impact the fluorescence of ThT (Figure S2), which further confirmed the imperative role of heparin.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The intensities of ThT fluorescence at 489 nm (λex = 440 nm). From left to right: 1) ThT; 2) ThT + Aβ (25 μM); 3) ThT + Aβ (25 μM) + Hep-SPION (0.0020 mg/mL); 4) ThT + Aβ (25 μM) + Hep-SPION (0.0078 mg/mL); 5) ThT + Aβ (25 μM) + Hep-SPION (0.0312 mg/mL); 6) ThT + Hep-SPION (0.0312 mg/mL). Incubation of Aβ in the presence of Hep-SPION significantly enhanced ThT fluorescence.

The disappearance of oligomer upon Hep-SPION incubation (Figure 3) was attributed to the fact that Aβ peptides exist in a dynamic equilibrium among monomer, oligomers and fibrils.34 Although binding with the monomer and oligomer forms of Aβ has not been well studied, heparin is known bind to the fibrillar form of Aβ.15, 31 It has been proposed that heparin can function as a structural template and facilitate Aβ aggregation and the growth to larger sized fibril.13 Thus, Hep-SPION can possibly perturb the equilibrium favoring the formation of fibril due to strong binding to the fibril.15

2.4. Effect of Hep-SPION on Aβ-Induced Cytotoxicity

Although it remains debatable whether Aβ peptides cause AD, the toxicity of Aβ on neuronal cells is an important contributing factor to the pathology of the disease. Among the various forms of Aβ, the soluble Aβ oligomers are considered to be the most toxic.4, 34 Shifting the equilibrium between the oligomers and fibril towards the more benign fibrils can potentially decrease the adverse effects of Aβ.3536 As Hep-SPION can reduce the proportions of Aβ oligomers (Figure 3A), we hypothesized that Hep-SPION could protect neuronal cells from Aβ induced toxicity.

To test the effects of Aβ and Hep-SPION on cells, cell viability assays were performed with SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, a common model utilized in Aβ toxicity studies.3637 Various concentrations of Aβ were incubated with SH-SY5Y cells in a 96-well cell culture plate. Cells in each well were collected and then mixed with 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD), a fluorescent stain specific to dead cells. The numbers of live and dead cells were counted via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with the percentage of live cells without any treatment set as 100%. Aβ peptide exhibited dose dependent cytotoxicities (Figure S3) with about 75% cell viability when treated with 5 μM Aβ. The SH-SY5Y cells were then incubated with Aβ (5 μM) in the presence of increasing concentrations of Hep-SPION. As shown in Figure 5, Hep-SPION could protect the cells from Aβ induced toxicity with 0.01 mg/mL of Hep-SPION enough to fully mitigate the effect of Aβ on the cells. Hep-SPION by itself did not have a significant impact on viability of the cells, demonstrating the biocompatibility of the nanoparticles. The protective effect of Hep-SPION can potentially be due to two factors: 1) the nanoparticles can induce the transformation of Aβ into the more benign fibril form; and 2) by binding with Aβ, the Hep-SPION can serve as a sink to reduce the amount of Aβ available for interactions with the neuronal cells.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Cell viability assay of SH-SY5Y cells. Addition of Hep-SPION protected SH-SY5Y cells from Aβ induced cytotoxicity. Incubation of cells with Hep-SPION (0.5 mg/mL) did not exhibit any cytotoxicity indicating the high biocompatibility of the nanoparticles.

3. Conclusion

We demonstrated that Hep-SPION could bind Aβ and heparin was essential for the interaction. Furthermore, Hep-SPION promoted the transition of Aβ into the more benign fibrils. This in turn could protect neuronal cells from Aβ induced cytotoxicity. As iron oxide nanoparticles have been widely applied as MRI contrast agents and drug carriers,2325 Hep-SPION can potentially be a useful platform for future imaging and drug delivery studies targeting Aβ.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Preparation of Aβ

Aβ peptide (0.5 mg) was dissolved in spectroscopy grade 99.9% 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (1.5 mL), sonicated for 15 min, and lyophilized for 72 h. The thin film was then dissolved in 0.22 μm filtered solution of 10 mM NaOH solution (0.25 mL). The pH of the solution was adjusted to 6 with 10 mM HCl solution and diluted with deionized water to a total volume of 1.0 mL (the concentration of Aβ stock solution was 100 μM). For experiments that needed Aβ fibrils, the stock solution was incubated at 37°C for 48 h.

4.2. ELISA Assay

Aβ fibrils (100 nM) along with Hep-SPION at different concentrations (0.008, 0.016, 0.031, 0.062, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0 μg/mL) were added into a 96-well plate (100 μL/well) and incubated at 22°C overnight. All wells were washed with 300 μL PBST three times and blocked with 1% BSA (300 μL/well) at 22°C for 1 h. After washing with 300 μL PBST three times, anti Aβ1–16 IgG (6E10) monoclonal antibody (100 μL/well, 0.82 nM, 1 : 4000 in 1% BSA containing PBS) was added and then incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The solutions were then discarded and washed again with 300 μL PBST three times. The goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (100 μL/well, 5.1 nM, 1: 6000 in 1% BSA containing PBS) was added into each well and incubated at 37°C for 1 h followed by washing with 300 μL PBST three times. To a freshly prepared 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solution (5 mg of TMB was dissolved in 2 mL of DMSO and then diluted to 20 mL with citrate phosphate buffer), 20 μL of H2O2 was added. This mixture (150 μL/well) was immediately added to the plate and a blue color was allowed to develop for 20 min. The reaction was then quenched by 0.5 M H2SO4 (50 μL/well) and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm on an iMark microplate reader.

4.3. Cell Viability Assay

Different concentrations of Hep-SPION solutions (0.002, 0.02, 0.2, 1 mg/mL) were pre-incubated with or without Aβ fibrils for 24h and then added into 96-well plate (50 μL/well). In each well, 2*104 cells were added in 4% serum solution. The final solutions in those wells are Aβ (5 μM), Hep-SPION (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 mg/mL) in 2% serum (100 μL/well). The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C. All media were collected in separate eppendorf tubes. Trypsin (50 μL) was then added into each well to digest cells and 4% culture media (200 μL*2) were used to wash wells and combined with original media in the eppendorf tubes. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended with FACS buffer (300 μL) in FACS tubes. 7-AAD (3 μL) was added into each tube, followed by incubation at 0°C for 10 min. All solutions were then analyzed by a flow cytometer to evaluate the cell viability.

Supplementary Material

01

Highlights.

  • Heparin-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have been synthesized.

  • Heparin nanoparticles can bind with β amyloid and accelerate the formation of fibril.

  • Heparin nanoparticles can protect neuronal cells from Aβ induced cytotoxicity.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Institutes of Health (R01GM72667) for partial support of this work.

Footnotes

Supporting Information. Materials, methods and additional experimental procedures can be found, in the online version, at #####.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.2013 http://www.alz.org/downloads/facts_figures_2013.pdf.
  • 2.Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1119–1122. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hardy JA, Higgins GA. Science. 1992;256:184–185. doi: 10.1126/science.1566067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dahlgren KN, Manelli AM, Stine WB, Baker LK, Krafft GA, LaDu MJ. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:32046–32053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201750200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bieschke J, Herbst M, Wiglenda T, Friedrich RP, Boeddrich A, Schiele F, Kleckers D, del Amo JML, Grüning BA, Wang Q, Schmidt MR, Lurz R, Anwyl R, Schnoegl S, Fändrich M, Frank RF, Reif B, Günther S, Walsh DM, Wanker EE. Nature Chem Biol. 2012;8:93–101. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Masters CL, Selkoe DJ. Biochemistry of amyloid β-protein and amyloid deposit in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, New York: 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Snow AD, Mar H, Nochlin D, Kimata K, Kato M, Suzuki S, Hassell J, Wight T. Am J Pathol. 1988;133:456–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Snow AD, Sekiguchi RT, Nochlin D, Fraser P, Kimata K, Mizutani A, Arai M, Schreier WA, Morgan DG. Neuron. 1994;12:219–234. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90165-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gupta-Bansal R, Frederickson RC, Brunden KR. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:18666–18671. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.31.18666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bame KJ, Danda J, Hassall A, Tumova S. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:17005–17011. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.27.17005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castillo G, Lukito W, Wight T, Snow A. J Neurochem. 1999;72:1681–1687. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.721681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Walzer M, Lorens S, Hejna M, Fareed J, Hanin I, Cornelli U, Lee JM. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;445:211–220. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01759-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McLaurin J, Franklin T, Zhang X, Deng J, Fraser PE. Eur J Biochem. 1999;266:1101–1110. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fraser PE, Darabie AA, McLaurin J. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:6412–6419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008128200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watson DJ, Lander AD, Selkoe DJ. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:31617–31624. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.50.31617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lindahl B, Westling C, Giménez-Gallego G, Lindahl U, Salmivirta M. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:30631–30635. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kemp MM, Linhardt RJ. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2010;2:77–87. doi: 10.1002/wnan.68. and references cited therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tan Q, Tang H, Hu J, Hu Y, Zhou X, Tao Y, Wu Z. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:929–942. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S18753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nurunnabi M, Khatun Z, Moon WC, Lee G, Lee YK. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2012;2:219–226. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2012.09.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shahbazi MA, Hamidi M, Mohammadi-Samani S. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65:1118–1133. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang J, Shin MC, David AE, Zhou J, Lee K, He H, Yang VC. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2013;10:3892–3902. doi: 10.1021/mp400360q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee J-h, Jung MJ, Hwang YH, Lee YJ, Lee S, Lee DY, Shin H. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4861–4871. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Corot C, Robert P, Idée JM, Port M. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2006;58:1471–1504. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Colombo M, Carregal-Romero S, Casula MF, Gutiérrez L, Morales MP, Böhm IB, Heverhagen JT, Prosperi D, Parak WJ. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:4306–4334. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15337h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.He H, David A, Chertok B, Cole A, Lee K, Zhang J, Wang J, Huang Y, Yang VC. Pharm Res. 2013;30:2445–2458. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-0982-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.El-Dakdouki MH, El-Boubbou K, Zhu DC, Huang X. RSC Adv. 2011;1:1449–1452. doi: 10.1039/C1RA00737H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.García-Matas S, de Vera N, Aznar AO, Marimon JM, Adell A, Planas AM, Cristòfol R, Sanfeliu C. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20:229–245. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Allaman I, Gavillet M, Bélanger M, Laroche T, Viertl D, Lashuel HA, Magistretti PJ. J Neurosci. 2010;30:3326–3338. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5098-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bitan G, Vollers SS, Teplow DB. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:34882–34889. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300825200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roher AE, Lowenson JD, Clarke S, Woods AS, Cotter RJ, Gowing E, Ball MJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 1993;90:10836–10840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Madine J, Pandya MJ, Hicks MR, Rodger A, Yates EA, Radford SE, Middleton DA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:13140–13143. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmed M, Davis J, Aucoin D, Sato T, Ahuja S, Aimoto S, Elliott JI, Van Nostrand WE, Smith SO. Nature Struc Mol Biol. 2010;17:561–567. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.LeVine H. Meth Enzymol. 1999;309:274–284. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)09020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Glabe CG. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:570–575. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vilasi S, Sarcina R, Maritato R, De Simone A, Irace G, Sirangelo I. PloS one. 2011;6:e22076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kouyoumdjian H, Zhu DC, El-Dakdouki MH, Lorenz K, Chen J, Li W, Huang X. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013;4:575–584. doi: 10.1021/cn3002015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Luo J, Mohammed I, Wärmländer SKTS, Hiruma Y, Gräslund A, Abrahams JP. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:1985–1991. doi: 10.1021/bm401874j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES