Skip to main content
Breast Care logoLink to Breast Care
. 2014 Nov 24;9(6):431–434. doi: 10.1159/000368431

Local Breast Cancer Recurrence after Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery for Paget's Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Yu-Jie Li a,*, Xiao-E Huang b, Xiao-Dong Zhou b
PMCID: PMC4317677  PMID: 25759627

Summary

Background

Paget's disease (PD) of the breast is a rare presentation of breast malignancy. Mastectomy has been considered the standard of care, but several studies have shown that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy is an alternative option. According to the literature, the total recurrence rate is as high as 20–40%. In an effort to enable a rational therapy decision, we compiled and analyzed the available data on PD.

Methods

Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, and China Journal Net were searched for studies concerning treatment for PD between 1990 and 2013. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of different treatments.

Results

7 studies with a total of 685 patients were included. The cumulative local recurrence rate was 7.6%, 5.6% among women undergoing mastectomy and 13.2% among those treated with BCS. Compared to the BCS group, mastectomy showed significant differences in terms of local recurrence (odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.21–0.69; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Since not all currently available diagnostic and therapeutic options (magnetic resonance imaging, radiotherapy, tamoxifen) were systematically used in the studies included in this meta-analysis, it may be presumptuous to suggest that mastectomy is the right choice for all patients with PD in a modern interdisciplinary setting. Rather we can conclude that all efforts should be undertaken to assure local control since BCS is not equivalent to mastectomy in the treatment of PD.

Keywords: Paget's disease of the breast, Mastectomy, Breast-conserving surgery, Meta-analysis

Introduction

Paget's disease (PD) of the breast was first described in 1856 by Velpeau [1] as an uncommon entity. PD is an infrequent presentation of breast malignancy, which is often associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and/or invasive cancer, and accounts for 1–3% of all the breast tumors [2]. The clinical appearance of PD of the breast is often described as a pigmented, erythematous, weeping, or crushed lesion with irregular borders. PD is often mistaken for a benign dermatologic disease involving the nipple. Mammography may depict a mass or calcification representative of invasive cancer or DCIS, but has limited power to detect underlying DCIS with PD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than mammography in detecting multicentric breast cancer [3]. Mastectomy has long been considered as definitive treatment for PD. However, some studies have shown that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a feasible option in selected patients. BCS has demonstrated similar long-term survival rates in follow-up studies, with approximately 5% risk for local recurrence in 5 years [4]. The purpose of this study was to compile and analyze the available data evaluating the outcomes of different surgical treatments in patients with PD, with special emphasis on local recurrence.

Methods

Literature Search

PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and China Journal Net were searched for studies on PD published between January 1990 and December 2013, without language restrictions. The search terms used were ‘Paget's disease of breast’, ‘recurrence’ and ‘treatment’. The reference lists of the relevant studies were checked manually for any additional studies.

Study Selection

Studies which met the following inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis: i) patients diagnosed with PD of the breast without metastasis; ii) controlled trial; iii) patients treated with mastectomy or BCS; and iv) reports available on 1 or more of the following primary or secondary outcomes: overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and local recurrence.

Data Extraction

Data was extracted by 2 of the authors (LYJ and HXE). The following data was gathered for each eligible trial: authors’ names, year of publication, trial design, patient eligibility criteria, baseline patient characteristics, age range, clinical tumor stage, clinical node stage, and end points.

Statistical Analysis

Although the fixed effects and random effects models yielded similar conclusions, many investigators consider the random effects model to be a more natural choice than the fixed effects model in a medical decision-making context [5, 6]. A random effects model was used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for local recurrence. Statistical analyses were carried out using Cochrane Review Manager 5.0 software. Heterogeneity was explored using I2 statistics, a measure of how much the variance between studies, rather than chance, can be attributed to inter-study differences. I2 > 50% was regarded to indicate strong heterogeneity.

Results

We identified 157 potentially relevant articles (fig. 1). After exclusion of duplicate references, non-relevant literature, and those studies that did not satisfy the inclusion criteria, 23 candidate articles were considered for the meta-analysis. After careful review of the full text of these articles, 7 studies were included. The study characteristics are summarized in tables 1 and 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the results of the literature search.

Table 1.

Overview of the reviewed studies

Author, year [ref.] Country Patients, n Mean age, years Study design MRI use, % Median follow-up, months
Dixon et al., 1991 [2] UK 47 62 retrospective review M: 40 / BCS: 56
Sutton et al., 1999 [8] UK 105 M: 57.7 / BCS: 57.1 retrospective review M: 84 / BCS: 60
Dalberg et al., 2007 [9] Sweden 212 70 retrospective review 144
Caliskan et al., 2008 [14] Italy 114 54 retrospective review 73
Joseph et al., 2007 [15] USA 45 retrospective review M: 82.5 / BCS: 90
Kawase et al., 2005 [16] USA 104 57 retrospective review 84
Siponen et al., 2010 [7] Finland 58 64 retrospective review 24.1 52

MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging; M = mastectomy; BCS = breast-conserving surgery.

Table 2.

Overview of the reviewed studies

Author, year [ref.] Study duration Patient source Radiotherapy, % Tamoxifen, % Histological findings of relapses, n
invasive non-invasive
Dixon et al., 1991 [2] 1973–1989 City Hospital, Nottingham M: 2 BCS: 3 BCS: 1
Sutton et al., 1999 [8] 1975–1997 The Royal Marsden Hospital M:4.1 BCS:45.2 M: 14.9 BCS: 19.4 M: 2 BCS: 1 M: 2 BCS: 1
Dalberg et al., 2007 [9] 1976–2001 2 regional Breast Cancer Registries: Stockholm-Gotland, Uppsala-Orebro M:9 BCS:19 12.0
Caliskan et al., 2008 [14] 1996–2003 European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy M:5.6 BCS:81.4 M: 1 BCS: 4 BCS: 2
Joseph et al., 2007 [15] 1990–1997 Columbia University Medical Center
Kawase et al., 2005 [16] 1949–1993 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center M:19.6 BCS:100
Siponen et al., 2010 [7] 1995–2006 Breast Surgery Unit of Helsinki University Central Hospital M:38.5 BCS:26.3 BCS: 1

M = Mastectomy; BCS = breast-conserving surgery.

Patient demographics for the 7 studies are presented in table 1. All papers were retrospective chart reviews. The year of publication ranged from 1999 to 2010. Study sizes ranged from 45 to 212 patients. 1 study [7] investigated the role of MRI in evaluating patients with a diagnosis of PD, and another 2 studies [8, 9] reported the use of tamoxifen. The majority of the studies had local recurrence as the primary outcome.

The total patient population for these 7 studies, was 503 in the mastectomy group and 182 in the BCS group. There were no significant heterogeneities among the 7 retrospective studies (p for Q statistics = 0.31, I2 = 16%). The pooled OR for local recurrence was 0.38 (95% CI 0.21–0.69) (fig. 2). Mastectomy faired significantly better than BCS in terms of the frequency of local recurrence (p = 0.001).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forest plot presenting the pooled odds ratios of systemic recurrence for mastectomy versus breast conserving surgery.

Discussion

PD is often mistaken for a benign dermatologic condition such as dermatitis of the nipple. A skin biopsy of the eczematous area should be obtained to exclude or confirm the diagnosis of PD. Once a patient has a confirmed diagnosis of PD, further imaging should be undertaken to evaluate whether there is an underlying invasive or non-invasive carcinoma. Since ultrasound and mammography are not specific enough to detect multifocal and/or multicentric disease, MRI may be helpful. According to several studies, MRI was highly sensitive in detecting invasive cancer in patients with PD, even if ultrasound and mammography showed negative results [7, 10, 11].

The surgical treatment of PD has been controversial. Historically, mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection has been the standard therapy, and this approach was supported by the observation that there was almost always an underlying invasive or non-invasive carcinoma. With the increasing diagnosis of early breast cancers and the findings from multiple randomized prospective trials, BCS has been demonstrated to be a feasible alternative for patients with disease limited to the central segment of the breast [12, 13]. The reported techniques for BCS in patients with PD vary widely and include nipple excision and central segmentectomy as well as these resections plus radiation. There is a place for BCS in selected patients with PD of the breast, especially those with no mass.

Dixon et al. [2] reported a high recurrence rate of 40% in patients treated with local excision alone, whose mammograms suggested in situ changes confined to the nipple area. Polar et al. [12] reported a local recurrence rate of 33.3% with a median follow-up time of 6 years in 33 patients treated with local excision alone with or without underlying DCIS confined to the nipple areola complex; they concluded that local excision alone was not an appropriate treatment for patients with PD of the nipple. Conversely, Bijker et al. [4] reported that BCS plus radiotherapy can definitely reduce the local recurrence rate (6.6%), and concluded that PD of the nipple cannot be treated successfully with BCS alone; radiotherapy was mandatory after BCS to maintain adequate local control. 2 studies [9, 14] noticed that patients with PD were more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and only a small proportion of ER- and PR-positive patients were treated with tamoxifen after surgery.

Our study was a systematic review of the available literature examining local recurrence in patients with PD undergoing mastectomy or BCS. The local recurrence rate was 5.6% in the mastectomy group (28/503) and 13.2% in the BCS group (24/182). With the limitations inherent in retrospective reviews, case control studies, and case series, our review found that local recurrence rates were higher in patients that underwent BCS with or without radiotherapy (fig. 2). 4 of our 7 studies mentioned histological findings for relapses (n = 13 invasive, n = 7 non-invasive). It appeared that relapsed patients tended to develop invasive breast carcinoma, and invasive recurrence was associated with poor prognosis after BCS in patients with PD of the nipple [2, 14].

There are some limitations to our study. First, most of the included studies were single-center retrospective chart reviews with inherent limitations such as selection bias and inaccurate or missing data reports. Hence, our findings must be interpreted with caution. To date, no randomized controlled trial has been completed to evaluate BCS for PD. The heterogeneity between studies with respect to the type of mastectomy and BCS may have been a source of study bias, as we were unable to analyze these factors independently based on the data reported.

In summary, our meta-analysis reviewed much of the literature published to date, and demonstrated that BCS is not a reasonable option for women. Further research must be performed with adequate reporting of recurrence based on stage and 5-year disease-free survival, which would then allow clinicians to better council patients about BCS for PD.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis illustrates that breast cancer recurrence rates with BCS do not compare to those achieved with mastectomy. Since not all currently available diagnostic and therapeutic options (MRI, radiotherapy, tamoxifen) were systematically used in the studies included in this meta-analysis, it may be presumptuous to suggest that mastectomy is the right choice for all patients with PD in a modern interdisciplinary setting. Rather we can conclude that all efforts should be undertaken to assure local control since BCT is not equivalent to mastectomy in the treatment of PD. Further prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up are required to validate the results of this meta-analysis.

Disclosure Statement

The authors did not provide a disclosure statement.

References

  • 1.Velpeau S. A Treatise on Diseases of the Breast and Mammary Region. London: Sydenham Society; 1856. p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dixon AR, Galea MH, Ellis IO, et al. Paget's disease of the nipple. Br J Surg. 1991;78:722–3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bagley FH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2004;139:380–3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.4.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bijker N, Rutgers EJ, Duchateau L, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for Paget disease of the nipple: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study of 61 patients. Cancer. 2001;91:472–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010201)91:3<472::aid-cncr1024>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:646–54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05282643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siponen E, Hukkinen K, Heikkilä P, et al. Surgical treatment in Paget's disease of the breast. Am J Surg. 2010;200:241–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sutton RJ, Singh A, Baker CB, et al. Is mastectomy overtreatment for Paget's disease of the nipple? Breast. 1999;8:191–4. doi: 10.1054/brst.1999.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dalberg K, Hellborg H, Wärnberg F. Paget's disease of the nipple in a population based cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:313–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9783-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frei KA, Bonel HM, Pelte MF, et al. Paget's disease of the breast: findings at magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:363–7. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000163742.40401.4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Capobianco G, Spaliviero B, Dessole S, et al. Paget's disease of the nipple diagnosed by MRI. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:316–8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0160-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Polgár C, Orosz Z, Kovács T, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for Paget disease of the nipple: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study of 61 patients. Cancer. 2002 Mar. 15;94((6)):1904–5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caliskan M, Gatti G, Sosnovskikh I, et al. Paget's disease of the breast: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112:513–21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9880-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Joseph KA, Ditkoff BA, Estabrook A, et al. Therapeutic options for Paget's disease: a single institution long-term follow-up study. Breast J. 2007;13:110–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2006.00381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kawase K, Dimaio DJ, Tucker SL, et al. Paget's disease of the breast: there is a role for breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:391–7. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Breast Care are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES