A recent study by Martens et al. found that children residing in social housing tend to display poorer health and educational outcomes than children who live outside of social housing. In addition, it was found that better outcomes in adolescence were associated with residing in social housing within wealthier neighborhoods.1 Although the results of this study provide clear implications for government policies and programs for social housing, crowding must also be considered as a factor. The authors note that many applicants for Manitoba Housing do not obtain a residence in their preferred location due to the size of the dwelling required.1 However, the study does not address the rates at which crowding occurs in this social housing program, whether as a result of limited availability or the socioeconomic status of the neighborhood in which families must live.
The effects of household crowding have been previously demonstrated and include: poor mental health status,2 reduction of coping strategies,3 increased risk of childhood injuries,4 exposure to respiratory issues and infectious diseases,5 and poor school performance.6 As a result, it is necessary to determine whether social housing in poorer neighborhoods features higher rates of crowding than is experienced in wealthier areas and whether this leads to an increase in the adverse health effects and poorer educational outcomes experienced by individuals living in these areas.
The study conducted by Martens et al. noted that individuals living in social housing in poorer neighborhoods typically experienced more adverse education and health outcomes.1 Perhaps if the authors had considered crowding within their study, they may have found that crowding accounts for at least some of the differences observed in health and education outcomes in social housing in lower socioeconomic neighborhoods.
Because previous studies have indicated that household crowding causes many adverse health and education outcomes independently of social housing programs or neighborhood socioeconomic status, it is possible that the effects of any one of these factors might exacerbate the effects of the others. Studies highlighting the differences in health and education outcomes based on socioeconomic status of neighborhoods are a step in the right direction; however, further conclusions are needed regarding the impact of crowding. Until each of these factors is considered together, significant changes made to social housing programs will have only limited impact on negative health and education outcomes experienced by children and families living in social housing.
References
- 1.Martens PJ, Chateau DG, Burland EMJ et al. The effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status on education and health outcomes for children living in social housing. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(11):2103–2113. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gove WR, Hughes M, Galle OR. Overcrowding in the home: an empirical investigation of its possible pathological consequences. Am Sociol Rev. 1979;44(1):59–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fuller TD, Edwards JN, Vorakitphokatorn S, Sermsri S. Stress and psychological well-being: evidence from Thailand on household crowding. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(2):265–280. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00089-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Delgado J, Ramirez-Cardich ME, Gilman RH et al. Risk factors of burns in children: crowding, poverty, and poor maternal education. Inj Prev. 2002;8(1):38–41. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.1.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cardoso MR, de Goes Siqueira LF, Alves FM, D’Angelo LA. Crowding: risk factor or protective factor for lower respiratory disease in young children? BMC Public Health. 2004;4(19):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roy AL, Raver CC. Are all risks equal? Early experiences of poverty-related risk and children’s functioning. J Fam Psychol. 2014;28(3):391–400. doi: 10.1037/a0036683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]