Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Dec 12;107:207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.012

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(A) Conventional HRFs and (B) frequency responses; (C) Simulated RS-HRFs and (D) frequency responses; (E, F) BOLD signal amplitudes (fitted slopes, BOLD-like contrast only) vs. frequency estimated from experimental data for DMN and ECN, respectively, normalized by the maximum amplitude of subject mean. As predicted, BOLD signal amplitudes dropped dramatically with frequency, but were still nonzero at the highest frequency (0.5 Hz).