Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1977 Dec;74(12):5749–5753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5749

Neurophysiological and behavioral evidence for selective reinnervation in skin-grafted Rana pipiens

Merle Knudson Heidemann 1,*
PMCID: PMC431871  PMID: 341165

Abstract

Rana pipiens with skin dorosoventrally reversed can respond to stimulation of the back with forelimb wipes to the belly and to stimulation of the belly with hindlimb wipes to the back. These “misdirected wiping responses” have been explained in terms of two alternative hypotheses of nerve regeneration: nerve respecification or selective reinnervation. Experimental behavioral and neurophysiological experiments reported here support the selective reinnervation hypothesis. Severing ventral nerves, which normally innervate the belly, greatly reduced the percentage of misdirected responses on stimulation of belly skin grafted to the back, while severing dorsal nerves, which normally innervate the back, increased the percentage of misdirected responses elicited under the same circumstances. Moreover, neurophysiological recordings of grafted animals showed three effects of skin grafting on nerve distributions: (i) termination of dorsal and ventral nerve receptive field at graft edges; (ii) overlap of nonadjacent ventral nerve receptive fields; and (iii) dorsal coursing of ventral nerves to reinnervate target belly skin displaced to the back. These neurophysiological observations, and particularly the third effect, also support selective reinnervation as the mechanism of nerve regeneration in skin-grafted Rana pipiens.

Keywords: nerve reintegration, skin grafts, tadpoles, cutaneous nerves, wiping responses

Full text

PDF
5749

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R. E., Jacobson M. Development of reflexes from skin grafts in Rana pipiens: influence of size and position of grafts. Dev Biol. 1970 Jul;22(3):476–494. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(70)90164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom E. M., Tompkins R. Selective reinnervation in skin rotation grafts in Rana pipiens. J Exp Zool. 1976 Feb;195(2):237–246. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401950208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacobson M., Baker R. E. Development of neuronal connections with skin grafts in frogs: behavioral and electrophysiological studies. J Comp Neurol. 1969 Oct;137(2):121–141. doi: 10.1002/cne.901370202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacobson M., Baker R. E. Neuronal specification of cutaneous nerves through connections with skin grafts in the frog. Science. 1968 May 3;160(3827):543–545. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3827.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MINER N. Integumental specification of sensory fibers in the development of cutaneous local sign. J Comp Neurol. 1956 Aug;105(1):161–170. doi: 10.1002/cne.901050109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Scott M. Y., Sperry R. W. Test for left-right chemospecificity in frog cutaneous nerves. Brain Behav Evol. 1975;11(1):60–72. doi: 10.1159/000123625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sklar J. H., Hunt R. K. The acquisition of specificity in cutaneous sensory neurons: a reconsideration of the integumental specification hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3684–3688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES