Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jan 29;3(1):e01497-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01497-14

Draft Genome Sequences of the Three Pectobacterium-Antagonistic Bacteria Pseudomonas brassicacearum PP1-210F and PA1G7 and Bacillus simplex BA2H3

Slimane Khayi a,b, Yannick Raoul des Essarts a,c, Samuel Mondy a, Mohieddine Moumni b, Valérie Hélias c,e, Amélie Beury-Cirou d, Denis Faure a,
PMCID: PMC4319514  PMID: 25635020

Abstract

Pectobacterium spp. are bacterial pathogens causing soft rot diseases on a wide range of plants and crops. We present in this paper the draft genome sequences of three bacterial strains, Pseudomonas brassicacearum PP1-210F and PA1G7 and Bacillus simplex BA2H3, which exhibit antagonistic activities against the Pectobacterium plant pathogens.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium wasabiae, and Pectobacterium carotovorum, including P. carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis and carotovorum, are worldwide pathogens responsible for blackleg and soft rot diseases on potato plants and tubers (13). Two biocontrol strategies against Pectobacterium phytopathogens have been developed, those of antibiosis and antivirulence (4). The biocontrol strain Rhodococcus erythropolis R138 targets the expression of the virulence functions in Pectobacterium spp. because of its capacity to disrupt the quorum-sensing signals N-acylhomoserine lactones (5). The genome sequence of the R. erythropolis antivirulence agent R138 was published recently (6). This antivirulence agent does not inhibit the growth of Pectobacterium spp. In contrast, we isolated three Pectobacterium-antagonistic bacteria, Pseudomonas brassicacearum PP1-210F and PA1G7 and Bacillus simplex BA2H3, which exhibit an ability to inhibit the growth of Pectobacterium strains in vitro. An assessment of their antagonistic abilities in the greenhouse and field settings is under way. Some other strains belonging to the Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. brassicacearum, and B. simplex species were previously described for their biocontrol activities against different microbial pathogens (710).

The genomic DNA of each bacterium was subjected to the next-generation Illumina HiSeq 2000 version 3 technology. A shotgun long jumping distance mate-pair library was constructed, with an insert size of 8,000 bp. The sequencing of the library was carried out using a 2 by 100-bp paired-end read module by Eurofins Genomics (France). Assembly was performed by CLC Genomics 5.5 (CLC bio). The sequence reads were trimmed on quality (threshold 0.05), and minimal size (>60 nucleotides). Contigs were generated by de novo assembly (CLC parameters, automatic determination of the word and bubble sizes with no scaffolding). Scaffolding of the contigs was performed using SSPACE basic version 2.0 (11). For the finishing, automatic gap closure was processed using GapFiller version 1.11 (12). The remaining gaps were resolved by the mapping of mate pairs, using as a reference the 8 kb from each of the contig ends (read length, 0.9; identity, 0.95). Next, using homemade script and fastq select.tcl from the MIRA3 package, the mapped reads for both orientations (R1 and R2) were retrieved and de novo assembled (using the CLC parameters). The sequences were annotated using the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) pipeline (13). The detailed statistics for the three draft genome sequences are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Statistics for the 3 draft genome sequences

Organism Accession no. Genome size (bp) N50 (bp) No. of contigs No. of scaffolds G+C content (%) No. of CDSsa No. of tRNAs No. of rRNAs
B. simplex BA2H3 AXBR00000000 5,542,531 339,104 34 11 40.2 5,856 75 31
P. brassicacearum PP1-210F AYJR00000000 6,772,045 210,148 51 5 60.4 6,045 67 15
P. brassicacearum PA1G7 JBON00000000 6,789,417 301,959 53 8 60.5 6,052 57 13
a

CDSs, coding DNA sequences.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The whole-genome shotgun projects for these bacteria have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers AYJR00000000 (P. brassicacearum PP1-210F), AXBR00000000 (B. simplex BA2H3), and JBON00000000 (P. brassicacearum PA1G7). The versions described in this paper are versions AYJR01000000 (P. brassicacearum PP1-210F), AXBR01000000 (B. simplex BA2H3), and JBON01000000 (P. brassicacearum PA1G7).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

S.K. received a Ph.D. grant from Paris-Sud University (Paris-Saclay University) and the Ministry of Higher Education of Morocco (no. H011/007); Y.R.D.E. received a Ph.D. grant from FN3PT-RD3PT and the Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (ANRT-CIFRE no. 1282/2011).

This work was supported by cooperative projects between France and Morocco (PRAD 14-02, Campus France no. 30229 ZK), and between CNRS, FN3PT-RD3PT, and CNPPT-SIPRE. This project received a French State grant from LABEX Saclay Plant Sciences (reference ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS) managed by the French National Research Agency under the Investments for the Future program (reference no. ANR-11-IDEX-0003-02).

Footnotes

Citation Khayi S, Raoul des Essarts Y, Mondy S, Moumni M, Hélias V, Beury-Cirou A, Faure D. 2015. Draft genome sequences of the three Pectobacterium-antagonistic bacteria Pseudomonas brassicacearum PP1-210F and PA1G7 and Bacillus simplex BA2H3. Genome Announc. 3(1):e01497-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01497-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pérombelon MCM. 2002. Potato diseases caused by soft rot erwinias: an overview of pathogenesis. Plant Pathol 51:1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Duarte V, De Boer SH, Ward LJ, de Oliveira AMR. 2004. Characterization of atypical Erwinia carotovora strains causing blackleg of potato in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol 96:535–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pitman AR, Harrow SA, Visnovsky SB. 2010. Genetic characterisation of Pectobacterium wasabiae causing soft rot disease of potato in New Zealand. Eur J Plant Pathol 126:423–435. doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9551-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Faure D, Dessaux Y. 2007. Quorum sensing as a target for developing control strategies for the plant pathogen Pectobacterium. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:353–365. doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9149-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cirou A, Mondy S, An S, Charrier A, Sarrazin A, Thoison O, DuBow M, Faure D. 2012. Efficient biostimulation of native and introduced quorum-quenching Rhodococcus erythropolis populations is revealed by a combination of analytical chemistry, microbiology, and pyrosequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:481–492. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06159-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kwasiborski A, Mondy S, Beury-Cirou A, Faure D. 2014. Genome sequence of the quorum-quenching Rhodococcus erythropolis strain R138. Genome Announc 2(2):e00224-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00224-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levenfors JP, Eberhard TH, Levenfors JJ, Gerhardson B, Hökeberg M. 2008. Biological control of snow mould (Microdochium nivale) in winter cereals by Pseudomonas brassicacearum, MA250. BioControl 53:651–665. doi: 10.1007/s10526-007-9102-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ortet P, Barakat M, Lalaouna D, Fochesato S, Barbe V, Vacherie B, Santaella C, Heulin T, Achouak W. 2011. Complete genome sequence of a beneficial plant root-associated bacterium, Pseudomonas brassicacearum. J Bacteriol 193:3146–3146. doi: 10.1128/JB.00411-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou T, Chen D, Li C, Sun Q, Li L, Liu F, Shen Q, Shen B. 2012. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas brassicacearum J12 as an antagonist against Ralstonia solanacearum and identification of its antimicrobial components. Microbiol Res 167:388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schwartz A, Ortiz I, Maymon M, Herbold C, Fujishige N, Vijanderan J, Villella W, Hanamoto K, Diener A, Sanders E, DeMason D, Hirsch A. 2013. Bacillus simplex—a little known PGPB with anti-fungal activity—alters pea legume root architecture and nodule morphology when coinoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae. Agronomy 3:595–620. doi: 10.3390/agronomy3040595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2012. Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol 13:R56. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES