Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jan 29;3(1):e01503-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01503-14

Draft Genome Sequences of Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains PA4C2 and PA3G8 and Pseudomonas putida PA14H7, Three Biocontrol Bacteria against Dickeya Phytopathogens

Jérémy Cigna a,b, Yannick Raoul des Essarts a,c, Samuel Mondy a, Valérie Hélias c,d, Amélie Beury-Cirou b, Denis Faure a,
PMCID: PMC4319517  PMID: 25635023

Abstract

Pseudomonas fluorescens strains PA4C2 and PA3G8 and Pseudomonas putida strain PA14H7 were isolated from potato rhizosphere and show an ability to inhibit the growth of Dickeya phytopathogens. Here, we report their draft genome sequences, which provide a basis for understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in antibiosis against Dickeya.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Pectinolytic enterobacteria of the Pectobacterium and Dickeya genera are causative agents of the blackleg and soft rot diseases on potato crops (1). Dickeya populations have mostly been described in tropical environments but were recently considered an emerging pathogen in Europe (2). Until now, Dickeya dianthicola and the new species Dickeya solani (3) are the two Dickeya species associated with blackleg on potato plants in Europe (4). Currently, there is no treatment against blackleg disease; hence, biocontrol strategies are developed in order to reduce symptoms in crops (5, 6). Many Pseudomonas strains are plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (7) and may produce antibiotic compounds, such as phenazine (8) and lipopeptides (9, 10), which inhibit the growth of other microorganisms. Consequently, Pseudomonas spp. are often used as biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens worldwide (11). Here, we report the genome sequences of three Pseudomonas strains, Pseudomonas fluorescens PA4C2, P. fluorescens PA3G8, and Pseudomonas putida PA14H7, which were isolated from potato environments and are able to inhibit the growth of Dickeya potato pathogens.

The genome sequence of each strain was established using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 v3 technology. Following a whole-genome shotgun, an 8-kb mate-pair library was designed and used to generate paired-end sequencing reads of 2 × 100 bp. The sequence reads were trimmed based on their quality scores, and ambiguous nucleotides were eliminated. The reads were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.5 (length fraction, 0.5; similarity fraction, 0.8), and contigs >2,000 bp were collected. Scaffolding was performed using SSPACE basic V2.0 (12), and GapFiller 1.1 was used in order to close the gaps caused by repeat regions (13). Finally, the last step was performed, which consisted of mapping the sequenced reads with each contig end. The mapped reads were assembled and blasted on the contig ends in order to fill the last gaps. The annotation of each genome was accomplished with the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (14). The genomic features of each Pseudomonas strain are presented in Table 1. The genome sequences of these three antagonistic bacterial strains against Dickeya phytopathogens provide a good basis for further biomolecular analyses in order to study the mechanisms involved in antibiosis.

Table 1 .

Genome features of P. fluorescens strains PA3G8 and PA4C2 and P. putida PA14H7

Strain Genome size (bp) Accession no. N50 (bp) No. of contigs No. of scaffolds G+C content (%) No. of CDSsa No. of tRNAs No. of rRNAs
P. fluorescens PA3G8 6,391,599 JBOO00000000 233,515 53 9 58.9 5690 67 16
P. fluorescens PA4C2 6,210,847 AXDA00000000 120,136 88 5 60.2 5442 61 15
P. putida PA14H7 5,878,755 JBOP00000000 173,633 64 7 62.4 5318 63 7
a

CDSs, coding DNA sequences.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers AXDA00000000 (P. fluorescens PA4C2), JBOO00000000 (P. fluorescens PA3G8), and JBOP00000000 (P. putida PA14H7).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

J.C. received a grant from CNPPT and LABEX Saclay Plant Sciences and Y.R.D.E. received a Ph.D. grant from FN3PT-RD3PT and the Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (ANRT-CIFRE no. 1282/2011).

This work was supported by a collaborative project between CNRS, FN3PT-RD3PT, and CNPPT-SIPRE, as well as a French State grant from LABEX Saclay Plant Sciences (reference ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS) managed by the French National Research Agency under the Investments for the Future program (reference no. ANR-11-IDEX-0003-02).

Footnotes

Citation Cigna J, Raoul des Essarts Y, Mondy S, Hélias V, Beury-Cirou A, Faure D. 2015. Draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains PA4C2 and PA3G8 and Pseudomonas putida PA14H7, three biocontrol bacteria against Dickeya phytopathogens. Genome Announc 3(1):e01503-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01503-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pérombelon MCM, Kelman A. 1980. Ecology of the soft rot erwinias. Annu Rev Phytopathol 18:361–387. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.002045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Samson R, Legendre JB, Christen R, Fischer-Le saux M, Achouak W, Gardan L. 2005. Transfer of Pectobacterium chrysanthemi (Burkholder et al. 1953) Brenner et al. 1973 and Brenneria paradisiaca to the genus Dickeya gen. nov. as Dickeya chrysanthemi comb. nov. and Dickeya paradisiaca comb. nov. and delineation of four novel species, Dickeya dadantii sp. nov., Dickeya dianthicola sp. nov., Dickeya dieffenbachiae sp. nov. and Dickeya zeae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1415–1427. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02791-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van der Wolf JM, Nijhuis EH, Kowalewska MJ, Saddler GS, Parkinson N, Elphinstone JG, Pritchard L, Troth IK, Lojkowska E, Potrykus M, Waleron M, de Vos P, Cleenwerck I, Pirhonen M, Garlant L, Hélias V, Pothier JF, Pflüger V, Duffy B, Tsror L, Manulis S. 2014. Dickeya solani sp. nov., a pectinolytic plant pathogenic bacterium isolated from potato (Solanumtuberosum). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:768–774. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.052944-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Toth IK, van der Wolf JM, Saddler G, Lojkowska E, Hélias V, Pirhonen M, Tsror Lahkim L, Elphinstone JG. 2011. Dickeya species: an emerging problem for potato production in Europe. Plant Pathol 60:385–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02427.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adriaenssens EM, Van Vaerenbergh J, Vandenheuvel D, Dunon V, Ceyssens PJ, De Proft M, Kropinski AM, Noben JP, Maes M, Lavigne R. 2012. T4-related bacteriophage limestone isolates for the control of soft rot on potato caused by Dickeya solani. PLoS One 7:e33227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Faure D, Dessaux Y. 2007. Quorum sensing as a target for developing control strategies for the plant pathogen Pectobacterium. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:353–365. doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9149-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alsohim AS, Taylor TB, Barrett GA, Gallie J, Zhang XX, Altamirano-Junqueira AE, Johnson LJ, Rainey PB, Jackson RW. 2014. The biosurfactant viscosin produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 aids spreading motility and plant growth promotion. Environ Microbiol 16:2267–2281. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mavrodi DV, Mavrodi OV, Parejko JA, Weller DM, Thomashow LS. 2011. The role of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol- and phenazine-1-carboxylic acid-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natural protection of wheat from soilborne pathogens, p 267–283. In Maheshwari DK (ed), Bacteria in agrobiology: plant nutrient management. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Bruijn I, de Kock MJD, Yang M, de Waard P, van Beek TA, Raaijmakers JM. 2007. Genome-based discovery, structure prediction and functional analysis of cyclic lipopeptide antibiotics in Pseudomonas species. Mol Microbiol 63:417–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tran H, Ficke A, Asiimwe T, Höfte M, Raaijmakers JM. 2007. Role of the cyclic lipopeptide massetolide A in biological control of Phytophthora infestans and in colonization of tomato plants by Pseudomonas fluorescens. New Phytol 175:731–742. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Weller DM. 2007. Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 97:250–256. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-2-0250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigsusing SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2012. Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol 13:R56. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES