Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Feb 5;3(1):e01435-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01435-14

Complete Genome of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium T5-Like Siphophage Stitch

James M Grover a, Adrian J Luna a, Thammajun L Wood b, Karthik R Chamakura a, Gabriel F Kuty Everett a,
PMCID: PMC4319617  PMID: 25657270

Abstract

Salmonellosis, caused by Salmonella, is a leading cause of food poisoning worldwide. With the continuing rise of bacterial antibiotic resistance, efforts are focused on seeking new approaches for treatment of bacterial infections, namely, bacteriophage therapy. Here, we report the complete genome of S. Typhimurium siphophage Stitch.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Salmonellosis is caused by serovars of the Gram-negative bacterium Salmonella enterica and is a leading cause of food poisoning (1, 2). With reports of antibiotic resistance on the rise, bacteriophage therapy presents an appealing alternative for treatment of bacterial infections (3, 4). Before a phage can be used in a clinical setting, much research is required to define various aspects of the phage’s life cycle (5). To that end, we report here the complete genome of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium T5-like siphophage Stitch.

Stitch was isolated from a sewage sample collected in College Station, TX, USA. Phage DNA was sequenced using 454 pyrosequencing at the Emory GRA Genome Center (Emory University, GA, USA). Trimmed FLX Titanium reads were assembled to a single contig using the Newbler assembler, version 2.0.01.14 (454 Life Sciences), at default settings. Additional sequencing was performed at the Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility at the University of Texas (Austin, TX, USA) to give a single contig at 80.9-fold coverage. Genes were predicted using GeneMarkS (6) and corrected using software tools available on the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) Galaxy instance (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-public/). Transmission electron microscopy was performed at the Microscopy and Imaging Center at Texas A&M University.

Stitch shares 62% sequence identity with Enterobacteria phage T5 (NC_005859), as determined by Emboss Stretcher analysis (7). The differences between the two phages occur largely in hypothetical conserved and novel genes. Stitch has a unit genome of 113,943 bp with 165 predicted coding sequences. A 9,982-bp-long terminal repeat was annotated using the PAUSE method (https://cpt.tamu.edu/pause) on raw sequencing data. Twenty-eight tRNA genes were identified in Stitch compared to the 16 tRNA genes present in T5.

As a T5-like phage, the genome of Stitch can be divided into several gene clusters. Proteins for host shutdown (presumably pre-early genes) were found, including 5′-deoxyribonucleotidase, A1, and A2 (8, 9). The early gene region encodes proteins whose functions relate to DNA metabolism, replication, regulation, and lysis. The late gene cluster consists of morphogenesis genes. As with T5, a tail protein was found present in a noncanonical location among the major capsid protein, the prohead protease, portal, and large terminase (8). Stitch also encodes the lytic conversion lipoprotein (Llp). The Llp binds to host FhuA to prevent the lysed cell from inactivating released progeny (10, 11). Stitch contains no HNH homing endonucleases compared to T5’s 9 homing endonucleases.

Stitch encodes a nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) transporter and an NMN adenylyltransferase that is found in T5-like phage EPS7 (NC_010583) but not in T5 itself. NMN adenylyltransferase catalyzes the biosynthesis of NAD+ and PPi from the condensation of NMN and ATP (12). As a T5-like phage, Stitch presumably has a nicked genome. It encodes A and B subunits of the NAD-dependent DNA ligase that are needed to seal the nicks and support genome replication (8). The NMN transporter and adenylyltransferase probably aids in efficient ligation and replication of the nicked genome.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of phage Stitch was deposited in GenBank under the accession number KM236244.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported primarily by funding from award EF-0949351, “Whole Phage Genomics: A Student-Based Approach,” from the National Science Foundation. Additional support came from the Center for Phage Technology, an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff. This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Bich464 Phage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

Footnotes

Citation Grover JM, Luna AJ, Wood TL, Chamakura KR, Kuty Everett GF. 2015. Complete genome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium T5-like siphophage Stitch. Genome Announc 3(1):e01435-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01435-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gole VC, Chousalkar KK, Roberts JR, Sexton M, May D, Tan J, Kiermeier A. 2014. Effect of egg washing and correlation between eggshell characteristics and egg penetration by various Salmonella Typhimurium strains. PLoS One 9:e90987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hardy A. 2004. Salmonella: a continuing problem. Postgrad Med J 80:541–545. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.016584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barton MD. 2014. Impact of antibiotic use in the swine industry. Curr Opin Microbiol 19:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnson RP, Gyles CL, Huff WE, Ojha S, Huff GR, Rath NC, Donoghue AM. 2008. Bacteriophages for prophylaxis and therapy in cattle, poultry and pigs. Anim Health Res Rev 9:201–215. doi: 10.1017/S1466252308001576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keen EC. 2012. Phage therapy: concept to cure. Front Microbiol 3:238. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes: implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Myers EW, Miller W. 1988. Optimal alignments in linear space. Comput Appl Biosci 4:11–17. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang J, Jiang Y, Vincent M, Sun Y, Yu H, Wang J, Bao Q, Kong H, Hu S. 2005. Complete genome sequence of bacteriophage T5. Virology 332:45–65. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hendrickson HE, McCorquodale DJ. 1972. Genetic and physiological studies of bacteriophage T5: III—patterns of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis induced by mutants of T5 and the identification of genes influencing the appearance of phage-induced dihydrofolate reductase and deoxyribonuclease. J Virol 9:981–989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Braun V, Killmann H, Herrmann C. 1994. Inactivation of FhuA at the cell surface of Escherichia coli K-12 by a phage T5 lipoprotein at the periplasmic face of the outer membrane. J Bacteriol 176:4710–4717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Decker K, Krauel V, Meesmann A, Heller KJ. 1994. Lytic conversion of Escherichia coli by bacteriophage T5: blocking of the FhuA receptor protein by a lipoprotein expressed early during infection. Mol Microbiol 12:321–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raffaelli N, Pisani FM, Lorenzi T, Emanuelli M, Amici A, Ruggieri S, Magni G. 1997. Characterization of nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase from thermophilic archaea. J Bacteriol 179:7718–7723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES